<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Here Are Some PPC-1 Pipe Statistics For Your Enjoyment</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/here-are-some-ppc-1-pipe-statistics-for-your-enjoyment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/here-are-some-ppc-1-pipe-statistics-for-your-enjoyment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipe international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipe networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Pipe International PPC-1 was switched on, providing Australia with its first &#8220;carrier neutral&#8221; submarine cable. But while we wait for all the ISPs to start selling us huge data caps at bargain basement prices, let&#8217;s take a gander at some of the stats of the cable.
*The cable spans over 6,900km between Guam and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/10/PPC1-pipe.png"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/10/PPC1-pipe.png" alt="PPC1 pipe" title="PPC1 pipe" width="550" height="301" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-359012" /></a>Today the Pipe International PPC-1 was <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/does-anyone-have-a-really-freakin-large-pipe-cleaner/">switched on</a>, providing Australia with its first &#8220;carrier neutral&#8221; submarine cable. But while we wait for all the ISPs to start selling us huge data caps at bargain basement prices, let&#8217;s take a gander at some of the stats of the cable.<span id="more-358924"></span></p>
<p>*The cable spans over 6,900km between Guam and Collaroy<br />
*There are 78 Tyco Telecom repeaters on the system, spaced 92km apart (on average)<br />
*The pipe has a 1.92TB capacity<br />
*Pipe networks guarantees 99.999% uptime<br />
*Every metre of the cable had to be manually placed into the ships that were laying it.<br />
*Internode were the first customer to trial the connection prior to today&#8217;s launch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/here-are-some-ppc-1-pipe-statistics-for-your-enjoyment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>70% of Kindle Owners Are over 40?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/70_of_kindle_owners_are_over_40-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/70_of_kindle_owners_are_over_40-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/70_of_kindle_owners_are_over_40-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Official Amazon Kindle Forum has a thread called the &#8220;Average Kindle Owner&#8217;s Age.&#8221; Someone counted up all 1,387 responses and found that 70% of respondents were over 40.


Keep in mind, the data is by no means scientific. There were no controls in the polling process, meaning that it&#8217;s quite possible for the average Kindle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/kc-chart1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The Official Amazon Kindle Forum has a thread called the &#8220;Average Kindle Owner&#8217;s Age.&#8221; Someone counted up all 1,387 responses and found that 70% of respondents were over 40.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: factoid, amazon, books, e ink, e-ink, ebooks, kindle, kindle 2, kindle owner average age, statistics, stats --><br />
<span id="more-335258"></span>
<p>Keep in mind, the data is by no means scientific. There were no controls in the polling process, meaning that it&#8217;s quite possible for the average Kindle Forum <em>reader</em> to be over 40 (or something exactly the opposite), while the average Kindle <em>buyer</em> is of a complately different age group.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s a staggering number that&#8217;s tough to completely write off as fictional. Kindles are obviously successful in their niche, but for most gadgets to take over the mainstream, they need to have a level of universal appeal that, sadly, supports tweens, mid-20s jerks such as myself and all those 40-year-olds who just CLAIM to be in their 30s during anonymous online polling. [<a href="http://kindleculture.blogspot.com/2009/04/kindle-demographics.html">Kindle Culture</a> via <a href="http://www.geardiary.com/2009/05/01/70-of-kindle-owners-are-over-40-how-about-you/">Gear Diary</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/70_of_kindle_owners_are_over_40-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cannondale Bicycles May Get iPod Dock Upgrade + Stat Tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/cannondale_bicycles_may_get_ipod_dock_upgrade__stat_tracking-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/cannondale_bicycles_may_get_ipod_dock_upgrade__stat_tracking-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannondale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod docks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike+ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/cannondale_bicycles_may_get_ipod_dock_upgrade__stat_tracking-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cannondale bikes hired a design firm to render up some possible future features on their rides, one of which is a very interesting one called MetroPolite that has an iPod connector. An iPod seems like the last thing you want to be shoving into your ears when you&#8217;re riding in a Metro area, seeing as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/picture4.jpg" class="left"   style="display:block;"/>Cannondale bikes hired a design firm to render up some possible future features on their rides, one of which is a very interesting one called MetroPolite that has an iPod connector. An iPod seems like the last thing you want to be shoving into your ears when you&#8217;re riding in a Metro area, seeing as bikes lose to cars when the latter accidentally hit the former, but the connector isn&#8217;t just for that.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: , bicycles, bike, bikes, cannondale, ipod, ipod dock, nike, nike+, stats --><br />
<span id="more-291842"></span>
<p><a name="galleryplaceholder" /></p>
<p>Based on the renderings, you can display a rear view camera on the screen (technically impossible) or use the iPod like a Nike+ device to track your bike workout (might also be impossible). Still, very cool if you&#8217;re using this on rides that aren&#8217;t through traffic. [<a href="http://www.cannondalecommunity.com/sketchbook/default.asp?item=309455">Cannondale Community</a> via <a href="http://www.cannondale.com/">Cannondale</a> via <a href="http://www.trendhunter.com/trends/ipedal-cannondale-ipod-option">Trend Hunter</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/cannondale_bicycles_may_get_ipod_dock_upgrade__stat_tracking-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu-ray Awareness Hits 60%&#8230;Hooray?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/bluray_awareness_hits_60hooray-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/bluray_awareness_hits_60hooray-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/bluray_awareness_hits_60hooray-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a recent poll by research firm Interpret, 60% of the U.S. is &#8220;aware&#8221; of Blu-ray. So does this actually mean anything? We&#8217;re not so sure. While brand recognition is important, it doesn&#8217;t appear that Interpret asked those polled to interpret what the hell Blu-ray really meant. Our guess is that if you asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/60.jpg" class="left"   style="display:block;float:none"/>According to a recent poll by research firm Interpret, 60% of the U.S. is &#8220;aware&#8221; of Blu-ray. So does this actually mean anything? We&#8217;re not so sure. While brand recognition is important, it doesn&#8217;t appear that Interpret asked those polled to interpret what the hell Blu-ray really meant. Our guess is that if you asked the public some basic questions (Can Blu-ray players play normal DVDs? Will Blu-ray play on a standard def TV? What new features does Blu-ray bring?) that the 60% statistic would drop abruptly. Why doesn&#8217;t Sony just run a simple commercial Q&#038;A? We don&#8217;t need hip marketing. We just need a clear explanation. [<a href="http://www.cepro.com/article/blu_ray_awareness_tops_60_but_hardware_penetration_low/#When:13:06:00Z">cepro</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: blu-ray, gadgets, home entertainment, playstation 3, portable media, ps3, sony, stats --><br />
<span id="more-283930"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/bluray_awareness_hits_60hooray-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like WoW, The Pirate Bay Has Reached 10 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/like_wow_the_pirate_bay_has_reached_10_million-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/like_wow_the_pirate_bay_has_reached_10_million-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the pirate bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/like_wow_the_pirate_bay_has_reached_10_million-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Torrent sharing group The Pirate Bay has asserted itself as &#8220;World&#8217;s Largest Tracker,&#8221; now claiming over 10 million peers sharing 1 million files. Not only is 10 million more than the population of New York City, it&#8217;s just about equal to the user numbers of the most successful MMO on the planet, World of Warcraft, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="piratewow.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/piratewow.jpg" class="center"/>Torrent sharing group The Pirate Bay has asserted itself as &#8220;World&#8217;s Largest Tracker,&#8221; now claiming over 10 million peers sharing 1 million files. Not only is 10 million more than the population of New York City, it&#8217;s just about equal to the user numbers of the most successful MMO on the planet, World of Warcraft, which not so long ago announced the same user milestone&#8230;and may have a thing or two to say about The Pirate Bay&#8217;s title. 
</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: bittorrent, p2p, stats, the pirate bay, wow --><br />
<span id="more-275150"></span>
<p>Blizzard, like The Pirate Bay, implements a P2P system. Instead of avoiding issues of copyright, the developer utilises P2P as an inexpensive way to distribute WoW updates and patches. And the last time we played WoW, which was admittedly some time ago, Blizzard&#8217;s P2P updater was pretty much mandatory to play the game. So if you&#8217;re thinking what we&#8217;re thinking, The Pirate Bay may have jumped the gun with their announcement. And Blizzard may actually be the sleeper king of P2P. [<a href="http://www.slyck.com/story1643_The_Pirate_Bay_Breaks_10_Million_Users">slycknews</a> via <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/27/0110227&#038;from=rss">slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/like_wow_the_pirate_bay_has_reached_10_million-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu-ray Outsells HD DVD Nearly 2-to-1 in US</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/bluray_outsells_hd_dvd_nearly_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/bluray_outsells_hd_dvd_nearly_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd dvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/bluray_outsells_hd_dvd_nearly_.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Home Media Research reports that from January 1 through September 30, Blu-ray sold 2.6 million discs in the US, while only 1.4 million HD DVD discs were sold.
Since it ended in September, the count doesn&#8217;t include Michael Bay&#8217;s reluctantly sold 190,000 Transformers HD DVDs, a figure which will probably continue to rise, adding to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Catfight_BD_HDD.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/Catfight_BD_HDD.jpg" width="463" height="346" class="center"/>Home Media Research reports that from January 1 through September 30, Blu-ray sold 2.6 million discs in the US, while only 1.4 million HD DVD discs were sold.</p>
<p>Since it ended in September, the count doesn&#8217;t include <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/michael_bay_still_loves_bluray.html">Michael Bay&#8217;s reluctantly sold 190,000 <cite>Transformers</cite> HD DVDs</a>, a figure which will probably continue to rise, adding to the HD DVD camp&#8217;s overall numbers. And the numbers may shift more favourably towards HD DVD as Paramount and Dreamworks maintain exclusivity for at least 17 more months.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it does suggest that, still without serious pushes from Fox and Disney, the Blu-ray posse is maintaining its lead, and even growing it: Since the advent of high-definition discs back in spring 2006, just over 3 million Blu-ray discs have been purchased stateside, while only around 2 million HD DVD discs have sold. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN2352882020071024">Reuters</a>]<span id="more-254059"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/bluray_outsells_hd_dvd_nearly_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>According to ComScore, web video watchers &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/according_to_comscore_web_vide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/according_to_comscore_web_vide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tbrief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/according_to_comscore_web_vide.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to ComScore, web video watchers have short attention spans: 2.7 minutes worth, to be exact, though we watch about 3 hours of online video a month. [NYT]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to ComScore, web video watchers have short attention spans: 2.7 minutes worth, to be exact, though we watch about 3 hours of online video a month. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/12/web-videos-audience-likes-27-minutes-at-a-time/">NYT</a>]<span id="more-252012"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/according_to_comscore_web_vide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A study carried out between September 2006 &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/a_study_carried_out_between_se/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/a_study_carried_out_between_se/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tbrief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/a_study_carried_out_between_se.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study carried out between September 2006 and April 2007 shows there are more Americans who only have a mobile than those who only have a landline. [NYT]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A study carried out between September 2006 and April 2007 shows there are more Americans who only have a mobile than those who only have a landline. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/27/technology/27drill.html?_r=1&#038;ref=technology&#038;oref=slogin">NYT</a>]<span id="more-251364"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/a_study_carried_out_between_se/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Our Tech Dollars Go: Landlines and Cable TV, Mostly</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/facts_and_figures_where_our_te/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/facts_and_figures_where_our_te/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/facts_and_figures_where_our_te.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Wired had this really cool chart that shows where we spend our tech dollars last week that we somehow missed, but better late than never, eh? The chart breaks down the average household spending on tech goods and services annually, and it shows that we spend way too much money on landline phones: 26% of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="techdollarchart-sm.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2007/08/07/techdollarchart-sm.jpg" width="520" height="248" class="center" /></p>
<p>Wired had this really cool chart that shows where we spend our tech dollars last week that we somehow missed, but better late than never, eh? The chart breaks down the average household spending on tech goods and services annually, and it shows that we spend way too much money on landline phones: 26% of all tech spending, to be exact. Who out there is still paying for a landline phone these days? Come on, fess up.</p>
<p>Full version of the chart after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-250101"></span><img alt="techdollarchart.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/techdollarchart.jpg" width="630" height="767" class="center" /></p>
<p>We also look to be spending way too much money on cable TV as well. In fact, it looks like if we were to drop our cable and phone services, we&#8217;d cut nearly half our tech spending out. Speaking as someone who has neither cable nor a landline, I can tell you that not paying $2,000 a year for those services is a pretty awesome feeling. What do you think, could you live without cable TV? It&#8217;s not that bad, really. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/15-08/st_infoporn">Wired</a> via <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/08/lose_the_tvland.php">Treehugger</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/facts_and_figures_where_our_te/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Is Ending: More Girls Than Guys Online</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/world_is_ending_more_girls_tha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/world_is_ending_more_girls_tha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/world_is_ending_more_girls_tha.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The internet is now officially a place to pick up girls, since they outnumber guys on the internets in the US by over 6 million users. Of course, most of them look nothing like Scarlet Johansson, but we can&#8217;t all be picky. Apparently, only 66 percent of them have heard of YouTube, however. Of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="scarlett%20intertubes.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/scarlett%20intertubes.jpg" width="250" height="334" class="right" />
<p>The internet is now officially a place to pick up girls, since they outnumber guys on the internets in the US by over 6 million users. Of course, most of them look nothing like Scarlet Johansson, but we can&#8217;t all be picky. Apparently, only <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/04/13/tech-women-online.html">66 percent</a> of them have heard of YouTube, however. Of course, the more pertinent question is, &#8220;are any of you reading Giz?&#8221; <span class="byline">â€“Matt Buchanan</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?1004775">More Women Online</a> [eMarketer via <a href="http://www.slashdot.org">Slashdot</a>]</p>
<p><span id="more-245358"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/world_is_ending_more_girls_tha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
