<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pocket Radar Is &#8220;World&#8217;s Only Pocket-Sized Personal Speed Radar&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/pocket-radar-is-the-worlds-only-pocket-sized-personal-speed-radar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/pocket-radar-is-the-worlds-only-pocket-sized-personal-speed-radar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catching speeders and clocking pitches just got a whole lot easier now that a radar gun has been developed that&#8217;s about the same size as an average mobile phone.

The Doppler-based Pocket Radar has the same degree of accuracy as traditional, bulky radar guns (within 1.6km/h) in a unit that&#8217;s small enough to fit in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/pocket-radar.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pocket-radar.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Catching speeders and clocking pitches just got a whole lot easier now that a radar gun has been developed that&#8217;s about the same size as an average mobile phone.<span id="more-367245"></span></p>
<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sRIiA3deU-A&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sRIiA3deU-A&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>The Doppler-based Pocket Radar has the same degree of accuracy as traditional, bulky radar guns (within 1.6km/h) in a unit that&#8217;s small enough to fit in a shirt pocket. It can also take up to 10,000 speed measurements on one set of AAA batteries. Of course, it&#8217;s probably going to be a lot more expensive for makers to tinker with when it arrives early 2010. [<a href="http://pocketradar.com/video/">Pocket Radar</a> via <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&#038;newsId=20091110006685&#038;newsLang=en">BusinessWire</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/pocket-radar-measures-speed-fits-in-pocket/">Gadget Lab</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/pocket-radar-is-the-worlds-only-pocket-sized-personal-speed-radar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sperm-Shaped Snowmobile Concept Would No Doubt Finish Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sperm-shaped-snowmobile-concept-would-no-doubt-finish-fast-even-in-the-cold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sperm-shaped-snowmobile-concept-would-no-doubt-finish-fast-even-in-the-cold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelos gicas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowmobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently British designer Evangelos Gicas took one look at those old, bulky snowmobiles we&#8217;re riding around on today and said to himself, let&#8217;s go faster, shall we?
Now, bear in mind this is a concept, but the goal behind it is pretty much laid bare for all to see in the design. Fast. Low to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/snowmobile-_04_7WlJA_17621.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_snowmobile-_04_7WlJA_17621.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Apparently British designer Evangelos Gicas took one look at those old, bulky snowmobiles we&#8217;re riding around on today and said to himself, let&#8217;s go faster, shall we?<span id="more-359610"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/snowmobile-_03_M39fY_17621.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_snowmobile-_03_M39fY_17621.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Now, bear in mind this is a concept, but the goal behind it is pretty much laid bare for all to see in the design. Fast. Low to the ground. Crotch rocket for the Arctic scene.</p>
<p>It also kind of looks like you&#8217;re riding a big green sperm, but I assume that was a design choice meant to convey a sense of masculinity or something. [<a href="http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/snowmobile-dreams-to-be-a-racing-motorbike/">Design Blog</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sperm-shaped-snowmobile-concept-would-no-doubt-finish-fast-even-in-the-cold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed Limit Sign Displays Days In Hospital Based On Your Car Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/speed-limit-sign-displays-days-in-hospital-based-on-your-car-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/speed-limit-sign-displays-days-in-hospital-based-on-your-car-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=351391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These 40km/h speed limit signs are equipped with a speed radar and a number display. Nothing strange about that, really. Until you notice that the billboard displays horrible figures&#8212;like days in hospital or crash bills&#8212;based on your speed.

I don&#8217;t know how it calculates the numbers. Maybe it&#8217;s just a speed display, maybe it uses some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/hospital_0.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_hospital_0.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>These 40km/h speed limit signs are equipped with a speed radar and a number display. Nothing strange about that, really. Until you notice that the billboard displays horrible figures&mdash;like days in hospital or crash bills&mdash;based on your speed.<span id="more-351391"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/accidentbills.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_accidentbills.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how it calculates the numbers. Maybe it&#8217;s just a speed display, maybe it uses some logic to come up with the accident bills costs or the chance of a crash. I do know, however, that people respond to fear more than to fines. 46 days in the hospital won&#8217;t be fun at all, so grab your steering wheel with <i>both hands</i>, and please drive safely. [<a href="http://directdaily.blogspot.com/2009/09/elm-grove-police-department-slower-is.html">Direct Daily</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/speed-limit-sign-displays-days-in-hospital-based-on-your-car-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Smallest Laser Paves Way For 100 Terahertz CPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/worlds-smallest-laser-paves-way-for-100-terahertz-cpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/worlds-smallest-laser-paves-way-for-100-terahertz-cpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasmons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=346841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically, it&#8217;s not a laser, but something called spaser. Instead of photons, it uses plasmons, a particle only 44 nanometres across. It could push CPUs&#8217; speeds to hundreds of terahertz, according to Mark Stockman, professor of physics at Georgia State.
 The spaser works about a thousand times faster than the fastest transistor, while having the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_spaser_x220_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Technically, it&#8217;s not a laser, but something called <i>spaser</i>. Instead of photons, it uses plasmons, a particle only 44 nanometres across. It could push CPUs&#8217; speeds to hundreds of terahertz, according to Mark Stockman, professor of physics at Georgia State.<div class="clear-fix"></div><span id="more-346841"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> The spaser works about a thousand times faster than the fastest transistor, while having the same nanoscale size. This opens up the possibility to build ultrafast amplifiers, logic elements, and microprocessors working about a thousand times faster than conventional silicon-based microprocessors.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> This new method treats light in a different way than traditional optical CPUs, which are &#8220;difficult to miniaturise because you can&#8217;t contain photons in areas smaller than half their wavelength&#8221;. In other words: Optical CPUs won&#8217;t fit in current electronics. Plasmonic devices, on the other side, can concentrate these nanoparticles in spaces similar to current processors. [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23249/">Technology Review</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/worlds-smallest-laser-paves-way-for-100-terahertz-cpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lexar Media Crucial SSDs Will Force Some Speed Into Your Netbook</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/lexar-media-crucial-ssds-will-force-some-speed-into-your-netbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/lexar-media-crucial-ssds-will-force-some-speed-into-your-netbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crucial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crucial ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexar media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, we were impressed by Corsair&#8217;s 240/170MB/s read/write speeds, but the new Crucial line tops it with a 250MB/s read and 200MB/s write. Even better, the Crucial SSDs are available right now.
The Crucial SSDs are available in the current standard of 64GB, 128GB and 256GB capacities at price points of $US170, $US330 and $US600, respectively. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_M225internal2.5-inchSSD_256.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Well, we were impressed by Corsair&#8217;s 240/170MB/s read/write speeds, but the new Crucial line tops it with a 250MB/s read and 200MB/s write. Even better, the Crucial SSDs are available right now.<span id="more-342194"></span></p>
<p>The Crucial SSDs are available in the current standard of 64GB, 128GB and 256GB capacities at price points of $US170, $US330 and $US600, respectively. Those prices may seem outlandish if you&#8217;ve never browsed SSDs before, but they&#8217;re actually pretty fair; Crucial is a respectable company and those prices are even a little below average prices at each capacity, regardless of the fact that they&#8217;re among the fastest on the market. If you&#8217;re looking to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/upgrading-the-ssd-in-a-netbook-makes-a-difference/">pump some speed into your netbook</a>, and you&#8217;ve got enough money to do something silly like spend twice the price of your computer on one component, they&#8217;re probably worth a look. [<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090720005199&amp;newsLang=en">Press Release</a>, <a href="http://www.crucial.com/store/ssd.aspx">Crucial Store</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/lexar-media-crucial-ssds-will-force-some-speed-into-your-netbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xbox 360 DVD Vs. Hard Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/xbox_360_dvd_vs_hard_drive-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/xbox_360_dvd_vs_hard_drive-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/xbox_360_dvd_vs_hard_drive-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The New Xbox Experience will provide 360 gamers with the option to preload entire games onto the system&#8217;s hard drive. Because of its faster data transfer rate, this should translate to faster load times, especially for earlier generation titles. In this clip, we see a side-by-side of GTAIV loaded on DVD vs. the hard drive. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" id="gtembed" width="494" height="405"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?umid=275585"/><param name="quality" value="high" /><embed src="http://www.gametrailers.com/remote_wrap.php?umid=275585" swLiveConnect="true" name="gtembed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="true" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="494" height="405"></embed></object>
<p>The New Xbox Experience will provide 360 gamers with the option to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/installing_xbox_360_games_is_easy_peasy-2.html">preload entire games</a> onto the system&#8217;s hard drive. Because of its faster data transfer rate, this should translate to faster load times, especially for <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/installed_xbox_360_games_old_titles_load_much_faster_new_ones_not_so_much-2.html">earlier generation titles</a>. In this clip, we see a side-by-side of GTAIV loaded on DVD vs. the hard drive. The result? The game loads, according to our unscientific counting, about 12 seconds faster from the hard drive. If you&#8217;ve got the space, we&#8217;re guessing it&#8217;s worthwhile. But our 20GB model only has about 3GB free at a time. [via <a href="http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&#038;newsid=32433">Maxconsole</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: speed test, 360, the new xbox experience, xbox 360, xbox 360 hard drive --><span id="more-309586"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/xbox_360_dvd_vs_hard_drive-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Safari vs. Opera Mobile vs. Skyfire: Who&#8217;s the Fastest?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/mobile_safari_vs_opera_mobile_vs_skyfire_whos_the_fastest-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/mobile_safari_vs_opera_mobile_vs_skyfire_whos_the_fastest-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/mobile_safari_vs_opera_mobile_vs_skyfire_whos_the_fastest-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three of the best mobile browsers that act like grown up ones are Mobile Safari, Skyfire and Opera Mobile 9.5. Even though the latter two (both for Windows Mobile) are still betas, Laptop Mag decided to toss them all into a race anyway, seeing which could deliver piping hot content the fastest. They ran Opera [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/browserwar.jpg" style="display:block;" />Three of the best mobile browsers that act like grown up ones are Mobile Safari, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/handson_with_windows_mobile_skyfire_browser_beta_06-2.html">Skyfire</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/opera_mobile_95_beta_1_available_now-2.html">Opera Mobile 9.5</a>. Even though the latter two (both for Windows Mobile) are still betas, Laptop Mag decided to toss them all into a race anyway, seeing which could deliver piping hot content the fastest. They ran Opera and Skyfire on an AT&#038;T HTC Tilt, so everyone was surfing on the same 3G network with beefy hardware. Spoiler: Skyfire delivered pages in one third of the time it took Safari or Opera. It&#8217;s because Skyfire cheats.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: cellphones, 3g, browsers, iphone, iphone 3g, mobile safari, opera, opera mobile, opera mobile 9.5, skyfire --><br />
<span id="more-298826"></span>
<p>Unmentioned in Laptop&#8217;s piece is that the Skyfire browser actually shows you a page that has been pre-crunched by Skyfire&#8217;s servers, so it&#8217;s essentially showing you an image. And yeah, since the browser itself isn&#8217;t doing any heavy lifting, it&#8217;s going to fly. But stuff like text entry is annoying, since you have to input text, send that back to Skyfire, and then it comes back to you. Flash works the same way, but hey, at least it does flash. We&#8217;re not really sure what&#8217;s up with Opera Mobile 9.5 taking twice as long as Safari to render a page, but maybe that&#8217;s &#8217;cause it&#8217;s <strike>big boned</strike> <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/opera_mobile_95_reviewed_verdict_even_better_than_safari_mobile-2.html">feature packed</a>. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/mobile-browser-showdown-iphone-3g-vs-opera-mobile-and-skyfire">Laptop Mag</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/mobile_safari_vs_opera_mobile_vs_skyfire_whos_the_fastest-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Vauxhall Cars Have New Camera That Scans Signs, Displays Current Speed Limit</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/british_vauxhall_cars_have_new_camera_that_scans_signs_displays_current_speed_limit-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/british_vauxhall_cars_have_new_camera_that_scans_signs_displays_current_speed_limit-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/british_vauxhall_cars_have_new_camera_that_scans_signs_displays_current_speed_limit-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although various GPS units already have the ability to display the current speed limit (they&#8217;re pre-programmed in) of the road you&#8217;re on, this Vauxhall Motors invention seems even better. There&#8217;s a camera on-board that takes 30 snaps per second, then recognising speed limit signs and translating that to a number to display on your dash.


This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/carsignreader.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;" />Although various GPS units already have the ability to display the current speed limit (they&#8217;re pre-programmed in) of the road you&#8217;re on, this Vauxhall Motors invention seems even better. There&#8217;s a camera on-board that takes 30 snaps per second, then recognising speed limit signs and translating that to a number to display on your dash.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: speed limit, camera, cars, digital cameras, gps, scanning, uk, vauxhall --><br />
<span id="more-296173"></span>
<p>This way you can know exactly what the speed limit is at all times, even when you&#8217;ve just transitioned from a high speed area to a low speed one that cops like to ticket in. In fact, if this system is good enough, it could be a decent excuse to tell the popos that their speed limit signs were too obscured that even a 30FPS camera couldn&#8217;t make it out. [<a href="http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2008/06/finally-a-car-t.html">Kicking Tires</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/07/03/honestly-officer-i-didnt-know-what-the-speed-limit-was/">Oh Gizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/british_vauxhall_cars_have_new_camera_that_scans_signs_displays_current_speed_limit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast Increasing Upload Caps By 2x/3x Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_comcast_increasing_upload_caps_by_2x3x_tomorrow_-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_comcast_increasing_upload_caps_by_2x3x_tomorrow_-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uploads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_comcast_increasing_upload_caps_by_2x3x_tomorrow_-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to leaked docs, Comcast is officially bumping up their previously tiny upload caps on two of their plans tomorrow. Their 6Mbps/384Kbps plan is becoming 6Mbps/1Mbps, and the 8Mbps/768Kbps plan is becoming 8Mbps/2Mbps. Some people might think they have this rate already because of Comcast&#8217;s recently rolled out PowerBoost feature, which eliminates bandwidth caps on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/downloading.jpg" class="left">According to leaked docs, Comcast is officially bumping up their previously tiny upload caps on two of their plans tomorrow. Their 6Mbps/384Kbps plan is becoming 6Mbps/1Mbps, and the 8Mbps/768Kbps plan is becoming 8Mbps/2Mbps. Some people might <i>think</i> they have this rate already because of Comcast&#8217;s recently rolled out <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Comcast_Boosts_Cable_Upload_Speeds/1178653787">PowerBoost</a> feature, which eliminates bandwidth caps on files of 10MB or less, and gives you a peak speed of about 2Mbps. This explains any extraordinarily high results you&#8217;ve been getting when using a bandwidth test site&#8211;which usually test uploads with files less than 10MB. Look out for this to hit tomorrow. See the official release after the jump.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  comcast speeds ,  cable ,  cable internet ,  comcast ,  comcast speed boost ,  powerboost ,  speed ,  speeds ,  upload cap ,  upload cap boost  --><br />
<span id="more-293094"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/comcastspeedrelease.png" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;"/></p>
<p><i>Thanks tipster!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_comcast_increasing_upload_caps_by_2x3x_tomorrow_-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast Rolls Out Japan-Fast Cable Internet, But Can You Afford It?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/comcast_rolls_out_japanfast_cable_internet_but_can_you_afford_it-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/comcast_rolls_out_japanfast_cable_internet_but_can_you_afford_it-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibre optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/comcast_rolls_out_japanfast_cable_internet_but_can_you_afford_it-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOCSIS 3.0 is the next-gen cable internet standard that allows crazy fast bandwidth of up to 160Mbps downstream and 120 up. The lucky first city to get a piece of that action from Comcast&#8212;which plans to cover 20 percent of its market with the awesome by the end of this year&#8212;is St. Paul, Minnesota. Denizens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/thumb463x_fastfiber.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none"/>DOCSIS 3.0 is the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/100mbps_cable_modem_certificat.html">next-gen cable internet standard</a> that allows crazy fast bandwidth of up to 160Mbps downstream and 120 up. The lucky first city to get a piece of that action from Comcast&mdash;which <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/100mbps_cable_modem_certificat.html">plans to cover 20 percent of its market</a> with the awesome by the end of this year&mdash;is St. Paul, Minnesota. Denizens can sign up for the Godzilla pipes starting this week, though the 50Mbps line will cost a whopping US$150 a month. And no, it won&#8217;t blow you. But, that is some sick bandwidth. So, is it worth it? How much would you pay?<br />
<blockquote>AU: I only put this up to remind you just how bad we have here in Oz. The shame&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/comcast-to-bring-speedier-internet-to-st-paul/index.html?ref=technology">Bits</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: cable, comcast, docsis, docsis 3.0, fiber, fiber optics, gadgets, internet --><br />
<span id="more-283860"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/comcast_rolls_out_japanfast_cable_internet_but_can_you_afford_it-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
