<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; soviet union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/soviet-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Beautiful Children&#8217;s Books Make Me Wish I Was Born In Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/beautiful-childrens-books-make-me-wish-i-was-born-in-soviet-russia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/beautiful-childrens-books-make-me-wish-i-was-born-in-soviet-russia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=373411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean, not really, but still! These wonderfully idiosyncratic illustrations, from 1989&#8217;s Hello, I&#8217;m Robot! by Stanislav Zigunenko, render our robot future in a way that conveys big ideas to children and pure poetry to the rest of us.
Perhaps what makes these illustrations work is that they trust their young audience with difficult questions: Are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/robotmom.jpg" alt="" class="right" />I mean, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/">not really</a>, but still! These <a href="http://ajourneyroundmyskull.blogspot.com/2009/12/mummy-was-robot-daddy-was-small-non.html">wonderfully idiosyncratic illustrations</a>, from 1989&#8217;s <em>Hello, I&#8217;m Robot!</em> by Stanislav Zigunenko, render our robot future in a way that conveys big ideas to children and pure poetry to the rest of us.<span id="more-373411"></span></p>
<p>Perhaps what makes these illustrations work is that they trust their young audience with difficult questions: Are our brains simply computers? Are our bodies mere machines? What is work, without agency? What is pleasure, without feeling? These are not things I was thinking about in 1989.</p>
<p>Or, you know, it could be the fact that they&#8217;re <em>utterly stunning</em>, and look like something you&#8217;d find in an art gallery, not a rotting children&#8217;s book. </p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_robotdrag.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_roboteye.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_robotwork.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
<p>More at [<a href="http://ajourneyroundmyskull.blogspot.com/2009/12/mummy-was-robot-daddy-was-small-non.html">AJourneyAroundMySkull</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/12/21/soviet-kids-book-rob.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:+boingboing/iBag+(Boing+Boing)">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/beautiful-childrens-books-make-me-wish-i-was-born-in-soviet-russia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The True, Heartbreaking Faces Of The Nuclear Era</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I write about high-tech weapons. There&#8217;s something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to obliterate each other for centuries, so it&#8217;s easy to forget about the real consequences of this mad race. Warning: graphic images.
A few years after the United States unleashed the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Soviet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s05_00009473.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s05_00009473.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Sometimes I write about <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/weapons/">high-tech weapons</a>. There&#8217;s something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/">obliterate each other</a> for centuries, so it&#8217;s easy to forget about the real consequences of this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/how_each_nuclearcapable_country_got_its_bombs_visualized-2/">mad race</a>. <strong>Warning: graphic images.</strong><span id="more-365713"></span></p>
<p>A few years after the United States unleashed <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/what-is-this-12/">the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki</a>, the Soviet Union tested their first nuclear warhead ever. They appropriately called it &#8220;First Lightning&#8221;, the opening of a series of 456 atomic tests that brought hell to Earth 60 years ago. For all of us, that summons terrifying but beautiful images like this into our brains:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_licorne-atomic-blast.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Sadly, to more than one million innocent people living near the Semipalatinsk Polygon &mdash; the Soviet nuclear testing site in the northeast of Kazakhstan &mdash; it means this:<br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s01_00009823.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/74/gallery_s01_00009823.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s03_00001340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/81/gallery_s03_00001340.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_s10_00000267.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/8b/gallery_s10_00000267.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_s22_00004607.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/dc/gallery_s22_00004607.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>For three generations, and more to come, those tests mean deformed babies. They mean premature aging and countless diseases caused by radiation poisoning. The bombs&#8217; ghosts still live in the dead steppe, their invisible fangs ready to suck seven years off the life of every person living around that place. That&#8217;s the difference in life-expectancy with the rest of Kazakhstan.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s not the only horror inflicted by weapons in the Soviet Union &mdash; or in the rest of the world. I recently read all about them in a fascinating book by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Kapu%C3%85%C2%9Bci%C3%85%C2%84ski">Ryszard Kapuściński</a>, one of the best journalists and writers of our time. The book, called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium_(Polish_book)"><em>Imperium</em></a>, talks about the Soviet Union through a series of adventures and trips that reach all the corners of the Red Empire. The mosaic is a frightening view of the deadliest, most insensitive killing machine that has ever existed, all through the eyes of the people who suffered it. Not even Hitler matched the horrors of Stalin and his cohorts.</p>
<p>But while Kapuściński&#8217;s raw prose have moved me to tears many times, these images by <a href="http://www.adventureswithlight.net/">Ed Ou</a> are a perfect summary of the horrors inflicted upon hundreds of millions that Kapuściński describes in his book.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s12_00004707.jpg" alt="" class="center" />However, as I watch through glassy eyes how Mayra Zhumageldina massages her daughter Zhannoor, or how 29-year-old Berik Syzdykov sings and plays piano despite being deformed and blind after being exposed to a nuclear blast while he was inside his mum&#8217;s womb, I try to smile a bit. I try to be a bit optimistic because, no matter how monstrous some men and women can be, the human spirit always seems to find a way to survive. [<a href="http://www.adventureswithlight.net/">Adventures With Light</a> and <a href="http://www.reportage-bygettyimages.com/">Getty Images</a> via <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/kazakhstans_radioactive_legacy.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Nervous: Rusty Soviet Doomsday System Still Turned On</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icbms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mertvaya ruka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perimeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ussr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired Magazine has a fascinating article on the doomsday system that was built by the Soviets 25 years ago. It was designed to obliterate the US no matter what happened to the USSR&#8212;and it still works today. Shiver.
 The point of the system, he explains, was to guarantee an automatic Soviet response to an American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/war_games.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_war_games.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Wired Magazine has a <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand?currentPage=all">fascinating article</a> on the doomsday system that was built by the Soviets 25 years ago. It was designed to obliterate the US no matter what happened to the USSR&mdash;and it still works today. Shiver.<span id="more-355583"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> The point of the system, he explains, was to guarantee an automatic Soviet response to an American nuclear strike. Even if the US crippled the USSR with a surprise attack, the Soviets could still hit back. It wouldn&#8217;t matter if the US blew up the Kremlin, took out the defence ministry, severed the communications network, and killed everyone with stars on their shoulders. Ground-based sensors would detect that a devastating blow had been struck and a counterattack would be launched.</p>
<p>The technical name was Perimeter, but some called it Mertvaya Ruka, or Dead Hand. It was built 25 years ago and remained a closely guarded secret.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The scary thing is that Perimeter still works today. At least according to Valery Yarynich, a former Soviet colonel now 72 years old. Yarynich should know, though: He worked 30 years at the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces and Soviet General Staff helping to build it.</p>
<p>US Officials won&#8217;t even like to mention it, but with the Cold War over and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/russian-akula-class-attack-submarines-patrolling-us-east-coast/">Russia being more or less a friend</a>, why risk having such a system in place? I really don&#8217;t like the idea of something going wrong in a rusty 25-year-old piece of Soviet-era technology.</p>
<p>Not when it can automatically launch a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/">nuclear attack capable of taking out Humanity out of the map</a>. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand?currentPage=all">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
