<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; sonic impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/sonic-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sonic Impact T-Amp 2 Now Available</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/sonic_impact_tamp_2_now_availa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/sonic_impact_tamp_2_now_availa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonic impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/sonic_impact_tamp_2_now_availa.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the Sonic Impact T-Amp? It was that tiny $US30 amplifier that, according to audiophiles, beat the crap out of $US300 gear. Now the second generation is finally here at more than double the previous price. Fortunately, according to the &#8220;experts&#8221;, it also packs double the oomph and now it&#8217;s comparable to $US800 gear:
&#8220;[Reviewing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="t_amp_gen2.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/t_amp_gen2.jpg" width="400" height="222" />Remember the <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/09/30/the-sonic-impact-t-amp/">Sonic Impact T-Amp</a>? It was that tiny $US30 amplifier that, according to audiophiles, beat the crap out of $US300 gear. Now the second generation is finally here at more than double the previous price. Fortunately, according to the &#8220;experts&#8221;, it also packs double the oomph <i>and</i> now it&#8217;s comparable to $US800 gear:<span id="more-257278"></span><img alt="t_amp_gen2_back.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/t_amp_gen2_back.jpg" width="400" height="207" /></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;[Reviewing the T-Amp] has been the most thrilling and incredible experience I&#8217;ve had with a component in, say, 25 years of HiFi listening. This website has existed since 1995, I&#8217;ve reviewed hundreds of HiFi components, inexpensive and ridiculously overpriced ones. I never &#8211; repeat &#8211; NEVER came across such a stunning piece of gear in all of these years.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>And while that may just be a little bit of quote whoring by the folks of TNT audio and we usually are skeptical about audiophile expert claims, at $US69.99 this seems worth a try.</p>
<blockquote><p>Product Specifications</p>
<p>Class-T architecture</p>
<p>Single Supply Operation</p>
<p>Audiophile Quality Sound</p>
<p>0.04% THD+N @ 9W,4 Ohm</p>
<p>0.18% IHF-IM @ 1W,4 Ohm</p>
<p>11W @ 4 Ohm,0.1% THD+N</p>
<p>6W @ 8 Ohm,0.1% THD+N</p>
<p>High Power</p>
<p>15W @4 Ohm,10% THD+N</p>
<p>10W @ 8 Ohm,10% THD+N</p>
<p>High Efficiency</p>
<p>81% @ 5W,4 Ohm 88% @ 10W,8</p>
<p>Dynamic Range = 102 dB</p>
<p>Runs off of eight AA batteries (not included) or the Included AC wall adapter</p>
<p>Input: 100V &#8211; 240V AC 50/60Hz</p>
<p>Output: 12V DC 3.0A</p></blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/electronics/audio/9c60/">Think Geek</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/11/sonic_impact_tamp_2_now_availa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod Dock Bracket, Sonic Impact T24 Vs. Eton Sound 100 iPod</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/ipod_dock_bracket_sonic_impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/ipod_dock_bracket_sonic_impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battlemodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonic impact]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/ipod_dock_bracket_sonic_impact.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For today&#8217;s match in our iPod Bracket Battle, the Sonic Impact T24 ($179.99) faces off against the Eton Sound 100 iPod ($199). And let me tell you, these docks hate each other, Montagues and Capulets-style.
Who will win the battle? Design/Functionality 
Sonic Impact

The T24&#8217;s design is stereotypical, so we&#8217;ll save you clichÃ©d descriptions of symmetry and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BATTLEMODOeton.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/BATTLEMODOeton.jpg" /><br />
For today&#8217;s match in our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/ipod_docks_the_sweet_16ish_bra.html">iPod Bracket Battle</a>, the Sonic Impact T24 ($179.99) faces off against the Eton Sound 100 iPod ($199). And let me tell you, these docks hate each other, Montagues and Capulets-style.</p>
<p>Who will win the battle? <span id="more-248238"></span><strong>Design/Functionality </strong></p>
<p><em>Sonic Impact</em><br />
<img alt="IMG_2783.JPG" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/IMG_2783.JPG" width="520" height="346" class="center" /><br />
The T24&#8217;s design is stereotypical, so we&#8217;ll save you clichÃ©d descriptions of symmetry and my takes on the finer distinctions of silver and gunmetal. The T24 has video out and is generally streamlined for ease of use.</p>
<p><em>Eton</em><br />
<img alt="IMG_2774.JPG" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/IMG_2774.JPG" width="520" height="346" class="center" /><br />
Internet shots of Eton&#8217;s Sound 100 iPod (essentially their Sound 100 with iPod dock) never impressed me much, but the in-person effect is much less retro-wannabe and far more small and indiscrete. Plus, you get a radio, alarm with sleep timer and an LCD that has plenty of room for the song titles but doesn&#8217;t display them. Oh, well.</p>
<p><strong>Sound</strong><br />
We just haven&#8217;t been able to shake Journey&#8217;s <em>Don&#8217;t Stop Believing</em> after watching the incredible Sopranos finale. So we looped that for a while.</p>
<p><em>Sonic Impact </em><br />
<img alt="IMG_2787.JPG" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/IMG_2787.JPG" width="520" height="346" class="center" /><br />
The entire sound has a bit of an echo, but not obnoxiously so. On the contrary, it rounds out the sound. The vocals are very strong and, once again I&#8217;m left with that car stereo effect: strong mids with highs that that blend into an indefinable but palatable mixture. But there&#8217;s not much of going on the lowest ranges.</p>
<p><em>Eton</em><br />
<img alt="IMG_2793.JPG" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/IMG_2793.JPG" width="520" height="346" class="center" /><br />
The sound feels more contained, but the highest ranges feel truer&#8230;if occasionally metallic. And believe it or not, this little machine performs better at the lowest ranges. It&#8217;s weird, the Eton&#8217;s downfall is its lackluster midrange playback.<br />
<strong><br />
WINNER: Eton Sound 100 iPod </strong><br />
<img alt="S100iPod.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/S100iPod.jpg" width="355" height="162" class="center" /><br />
We choose the Eton, not because of the sound (which is admittedly a half step better on the Sonic Impact), but for the small stature that still manages to keep up that is packed with practical features. Neither of these units should be chosen based upon their fidelity alone, so with a width of roughly half its competitor&#8217;s size, Eton&#8217;s Sound 100 iPod takes this round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/ipod_dock_bracket_sonic_impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
