<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; solid state</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/solid-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Samsung Working With Apple To Optimise Solid State Drive Performance In Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/samsung_working_with_apple_to_optimise_solid_state_drive_performance_in_snow_leopard-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/samsung_working_with_apple_to_optimise_solid_state_drive_performance_in_snow_leopard-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hickey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/samsung_working_with_apple_to_optimise_solid_state_drive_performance_in_snow_leopard-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung has been pioneering efforts to improve performance of SSDs in operating systems, working with Apple to integrate ZFS reading and writing to the next version of OSX Server. This means a 128-bit file system with faster data throughput and lots of other fun things that make servers run better. This also means Apple is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/Samsung_2_5_SATA_II_SSD.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />Samsung has been pioneering efforts to improve performance of SSDs in operating systems, working with Apple to integrate ZFS reading and writing to the next version of OSX Server. This means a 128-bit file system with faster data throughput and lots of other fun things that make servers run better. This also means Apple is taking SSD technology seriously, as it has already dropped the price of the SSD upgrade for the MacBook Air&mdash;the only current MacBook to ship with an SSD option&mdash;to US$599 from US$999. We likely won&#8217;t see SSDs across the MacBook lines yet, but this means it could be in the cards. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/08/08/zfs-and-snow-leopard-to-speed-up-solid-state-drive-performance/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: ssd, apple, macbook, macbook air, os x, samsung, snow leopard, solid state drives --><br />
<span id="more-301168"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/samsung_working_with_apple_to_optimise_solid_state_drive_performance_in_snow_leopard-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffalo&#8217;s 32GB and 64GB SSDs For Eee PC Get Launch Date, Price</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/buffalos_32gb_and_64gb_ssds_for_eee_pc_get_launch_date_price-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/buffalos_32gb_and_64gb_ssds_for_eee_pc_get_launch_date_price-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kit Eaton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eee pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/buffalos_32gb_and_64gb_ssds_for_eee_pc_get_launch_date_price-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asus&#8217;s EeePC 901 has already proved itself very hackable but Buffalo&#8217;s newest product won&#8217;t require much modding: 32GB or 64GB replacement SSD&#8217;s. Not much more to say, apart from the obvious: more storage, more impact resilient, longer battery life. The best bit? The 32GB SHD-EP9M32G is a mere US$156, and the 64GB SHD-EP9M64G an equally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/buffalo1.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />Asus&#8217;s EeePC 901 has already proved itself very <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/modder_discovers_eee_pc_901_is_most_hackable_yet-2.html">hackable</a> but Buffalo&#8217;s newest product won&#8217;t require much modding: 32GB or 64GB replacement SSD&#8217;s. Not much more to say, apart from the obvious: more storage, more impact resilient, longer battery life. The best bit? The 32GB SHD-EP9M32G is a mere US$156, and the 64GB SHD-EP9M64G an equally neat US$316. Available in Japan at first, mid-September.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: storage, 901, asus, buffalo, eee, eee pc, flash drive, gadgets, shd-ep9m32g, shd-ep9m64g, solid state drive, ssd --><br />
<span id="more-299488"></span>
<p>[<a href="http://66.102.9.104/translate_c?hl=en&#038;sl=ja&#038;u=http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0729/buffalo.htm">PC Watch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/buffalos_32gb_and_64gb_ssds_for_eee_pc_get_launch_date_price-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom&#8217;s Hardware Corrects Study, Says Solid State Drives Do Improve Battery Life</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/toms_hardware_corrects_study_says_solid_state_drives_do_improve_battery_life-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/toms_hardware_corrects_study_says_solid_state_drives_do_improve_battery_life-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benny Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/toms_hardware_corrects_study_says_solid_state_drives_do_improve_battery_life-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom&#8217;s Hardware tested battery life in laptops with SSDs yet again and found that they aren&#8217;t such a power suck, correcting a previous study. SSDs didn&#8217;t outperform their HDD counterparts in all tests, but combined with Laptop Mag&#8217;s study I think we can safely put the issue to rest for now. [Tom's Hardware]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/workstation-io-power.png" class="center" style="display:block;" />Tom&#8217;s Hardware tested battery life in laptops with SSDs yet again and found that they aren&#8217;t such a power suck, correcting a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/swindled_solid_state_drives_dont_extend_battery_life_they_shorten_it-2.html">previous study</a>. SSDs didn&#8217;t outperform their HDD counterparts in all tests, but combined with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/new_study_says_solid_state_drives_iarei_better_for_battery_life_not_worse-2.html">Laptop Mag&#8217;s</a> study I think we can safely put the issue to rest for now. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hard-drive,1968.html">Tom's Hardware</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: tests, hard drives, harddrives, hdd, hdds, solid state drives, ssd, tom's hardware --><br />
<span id="more-297625"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/toms_hardware_corrects_study_says_solid_state_drives_do_improve_battery_life-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Starts Mass Production of Cheap 128GB MLC Solid State Drives</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/samsung_starts_mass_production_of_cheap_128gb_mlc_solid_state_drives-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/samsung_starts_mass_production_of_cheap_128gb_mlc_solid_state_drives-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kit Eaton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/samsung_starts_mass_production_of_cheap_128gb_mlc_solid_state_drives-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We mentioned it back in February, and Samsung has now come good with its promise, announcing today that it&#8217;s started mass-production of 128GB SSDs. They&#8217;re of the slightly slower but cheaper multi-level cell technology, with a read speed of 90MBps and write speed of 70MBps. And Samsung claims they&#8217;ll have a life span around &#8220;20 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/Samsung_SSD_1.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />We mentioned it back in <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/samsung_planning_on_256gb_ssds_huge_price_drops_by_end_of_the_year-2.html">February</a>, and Samsung has now come good with its promise, announcing today that it&#8217;s started mass-production of 128GB SSDs. They&#8217;re of the slightly slower but cheaper multi-level cell technology, with a read speed of 90MBps and write speed of 70MBps. And Samsung claims they&#8217;ll have a life span around &#8220;20 times longer than the generally accepted 4-5 year life span of a notebook PC hard drive.&#8221; It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what this move does to the price of SSDs, particularly now that we <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/new_study_says_solid_state_drives_iarei_better_for_battery_life_not_worse-2.html">like them again</a>. Press release below.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: ssds, 128 gb ssd, flash, gadgets, mass production, mlc, news, samsung, solid state drive, storage --><br />
<span id="more-296777"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p>Seoul, Korea &#8211; July 9, 2008: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., the world leader in advanced semiconductor technology, announced today that it has begun mass producing 1.8- and 2.5-inch multi-level cell (MLC)-based solid state drives (SSD) with a 128 Gigabyte (GB) storage capacity. Mass production of the Samsung MLC-based 64GB SSD also began this month.</p>
<p>&#8220;With the 64 GB and 128 GB MLC SSDs, we are satisfying the density requirements of most business users and many PC enthusiasts, who will appreciate not only the performance gains and added reliability, but also the more attractive pricing,&#8221; said Jim Elliott, vice president, memory marketing, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.</p>
<p>Samsung SSDs feature far greater reliability, faster boot times and faster application start-up times than hard disk drives. Power consumption for the Samsung SSD is exceptionally low in standby mode at approximately 0.2 watts and in active mode at 0.5 watts.</p>
<p>The Samsung MLC-based SSD has a write speed of 70MB/s and a read speed of 90MB/s &#8211; performance levels that approach those of single-level-cell (SLC)-based SSDs now in mass production. Moreover, the new 128GB SSD will last approximately 20 times longer than the generally accepted 4-5 year life span of a notebook PC hard drive.</p>
<p>Featuring a 3.0 gigabit-per-second interface, the 128GB MLC-based SSD consists of 64 MLC NAND flash memory chips of 16 gigabits each, optimised single-chip controller technology and advanced flash-management firmware technology. Enclosed in a brushed metallic casing, it measures 100mm x 69.8mm and is only 9.5mm thick.</p>
<p>Samsung is aggressively expanding its SSD market offerings. It introduced a 64GB SSD in the second half of 2007, and plans to begin producing a 256GB at the end of this year. Samsung&#8217;s mass production of 128GB SSDs helps it to maintain its position as the leading producer of SSDs in the world, with capacities ranging from 32GB to the highest available today.</p>
<p>Samsung expects sales of SSD units to increase 800 percent between now and 2010, keeping SSDs on pace to be the largest growth segment in the NAND flash market over the next few years.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/samsung_starts_mass_production_of_cheap_128gb_mlc_solid_state_drives-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study Says Solid State Drives Are Better for Battery Life, Not Worse</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/new_study_says_solid_state_drives_iarei_better_for_battery_life_not_worse-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/new_study_says_solid_state_drives_iarei_better_for_battery_life_not_worse-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/new_study_says_solid_state_drives_iarei_better_for_battery_life_not_worse-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope this SSD good/bad theme doesn&#8217;t turn into one of those long-running &#8220;good for you/bad for you&#8221; food fiascoes (is coffee on the good list again, by the way? Blogging is thirsty work.) A new bit of investigation by Laptopmag seems to challenge the Tom&#8217;s Hardware study that put SSD&#8217;s battery performance in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/SSDbattery.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />I hope this SSD good/bad theme doesn&#8217;t turn into one of those long-running &#8220;good for you/bad for you&#8221; food fiascoes (is coffee on the good list again, by the way? Blogging is thirsty work.) A new bit of investigation by Laptopmag seems to challenge the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/swindled_solid_state_drives_dont_extend_battery_life_they_shorten_it-2.html">Tom&#8217;s Hardware</a> study that put SSD&#8217;s battery performance in the shade. Citing flaws in the original method, the new study tried the drives under a more &#8220;real world use&#8221; test regime: cycling through webpages over and over.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: ssd, battery, gadgets, hard drives, hdd, solid state drives, swindled --><br />
<span id="more-296350"></span>
<p>They took a Gateway T-6828 with Vista Home Premium SP1 and tried it with it&#8217;s native Western Digital Scorpio WD2500BEVS and two SSDs: a Samsung SATA II 64GB, and a SanDisk SATA 5000 32GB.</p>
<p>And guess what? Both SSD&#8217;s resulted in an extra 10 minutes of battery life, versus the native hard drive. That&#8217;s not a huge difference, sure, but it&#8217;s a completely different story to the Toms hardware study which showed <i>worse</i> battery performance.</p>
<p>Laptopmag admit that the absolute hardware choices both studies make may have a large impact, but they conclude &#8220;in real-world use, SSDs offer a small improvement in battery life.&#8221; And of course there&#8217;s the potentially faster loading times you get from SSD&#8217;s, meaning your laptop&#8217;s uptime may be more productive. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/web-surfing-test-shows-ssds-better-for-battery-life">Laptopmag</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/new_study_says_solid_state_drives_iarei_better_for_battery_life_not_worse-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swindled: Solid State Drives Don&#8217;t Extend Battery Life, They Shorten It</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/swindled_solid_state_drives_dont_extend_battery_life_they_shorten_it-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/swindled_solid_state_drives_dont_extend_battery_life_they_shorten_it-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/swindled_solid_state_drives_dont_extend_battery_life_they_shorten_it-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solid state drives (SSDs) are the inevitable future of mobile computing, but a new experiment by Tom&#8217;s Hardware is extremely disappointing. It ends up that the touted power savings of SSDs over their moving-parts-laden cousins are nonexistent. In fact, SSDs are sucking more power than conventional hard drives. How is this possible? Tom&#8217;s Hardware thinks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/mobilmark07-performance-runtime.png" class="left" style="display:block;"/>Solid state drives (SSDs) are the inevitable future of mobile computing, but a new experiment by Tom&#8217;s Hardware is extremely disappointing. It ends up that the touted power savings of SSDs over their moving-parts-laden cousins are nonexistent. In fact, SSDs are sucking <em>more</em> power than conventional hard drives. How is this possible? Tom&#8217;s Hardware thinks they know.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: debunked, hard drives, solid state drives, ssd --><br />
<span id="more-295820"></span>
<p>While moving hard drives have higher power requirements on paper, in reality, those peaks are only reached when random data is being searched out. On average, these drives have become very power efficient and rarely peak even when data is being accessed.</p>
<p>SSDs, on the other hand, pretty much have an &#8220;on&#8221; mode and an &#8220;off&#8221; mode. That&#8217;s it. So while you are using your hard drive, that mode is pretty much always going to be the &#8220;on&#8221; one. SSD manufacturers haven&#8217;t focused on other power saving principles at this time. And until they do, don&#8217;t expect things to get any better.</p>
<p><em>Note: the benchmarks were all completed on the same Dell laptop. A 5400 RPM hard drive would have even lower power consumption than the 7200 RPM model tested.<br /></em><br /> As for buying that new SSD for your notebook&#8230;I&#8217;d suggest you wait a bit longer, even if you have the cash. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955.html#">Tom's Hardware</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/01/shock-horror-apparently-ssds-dont-save-you-any-power/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/swindled_solid_state_drives_dont_extend_battery_life_they_shorten_it-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sub-US$500 128GB Drive from OCZ May be the SSD You&#8217;ve Been Saving For</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/sub500_128gb_drive_from_ocz_may_be_the_ssd_youve_been_saving_for-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/sub500_128gb_drive_from_ocz_may_be_the_ssd_youve_been_saving_for-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/sub500_128gb_drive_from_ocz_may_be_the_ssd_youve_been_saving_for-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OCZ&#8217;s new Core Series SSD&#8217;s are designed to be large and affordable. So the new 2.5-inch SATA II flash drives are coming in 128GB, 64GB and 32GB sizes at US$479, US$259 and US$169 respectively. They don&#8217;t match up to the 200Mbps read speeds Samsung has promised&#8211;managing 135Mbs&#8211; but that price point is pretty low. And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/oczssd.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;"/>OCZ&#8217;s new Core Series SSD&#8217;s are designed to be large and affordable. So the new 2.5-inch SATA II flash drives are coming in 128GB, 64GB and 32GB sizes at US$479, US$259 and US$169 respectively. They don&#8217;t match up to the 200Mbps read speeds <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/blazing_samsung_256gb_ssd_is_the_one_weve_been_waiting_for-2.html">Samsung</a> has promised&#8211;managing 135Mbs&#8211; but that price point is pretty low. And while they&#8217;re too big to drop into the smallest laptops (MacBook Air owners will weep), they might be just the ticket for people looking to cheaply upgrade to SSD&#8211;OCZ claim ten times faster than their HDDs and half the power. Available &#8220;soon.&#8221; Press release below.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: ssd, 128gb, core series, gadgets, hard drive, memory, ocz, solid state, storage --><br />
<span id="more-295748"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p>Jul 01, 2008 04:00</p>
<p>OCZ Technology Announces Core Series SATA II 2.5 Solid State Drive Delivering the World&#8217;s First Truly Affordable High-Performance SSD for Consumers at Price Points Less Than 50% of Comparable High Performance SSDs</p>
<p>SUNNYVALE, Calif. &#8211;(Business Wire)&#8211; Jul. 1, 2008 OCZ Technology Group, Inc. (LSE:OCZ), a worldwide leader in innovative, ultra-high performance and high reliability memory and computer components, today unveiled the OCZ Core Series SATA II 2.5&#8243; Solid State Drives (SSDs). OCZ has gained momentum in this pioneering technology, which uses NAND flash instead of rotating platters as the storage medium, and is a high-performance, highly reliable and energy-efficient alternative to conventional hard disc drives.</p>
<p> The OCZ Core Series delivers the performance and reliability of the latest SSDs at a 50% less price per gigabyte than other high speed offerings currently on the market. For the first time, OCZ is putting SSD technology within reach of the average consumer, and delivering on the promise of SSDs as an alternative to traditional hard drives in consumer targeted mobile applications.</p>
<p>&#8220;SSDs offer higher performance, reliability, and energy efficiency than conventional HDDs but the cost variance has limited adoption of vastly superior SSD technology, until now,&#8221; said Ryan Petersen, CEO of OCZ Technology. &#8220;It is our mission to deliver the highest performance products to consumers at reasonable prices, and with the release of the Core Series SSDs we have done exactly that.&#8221;</p>
<p>OCZ Core Series Solid State Drives enable enhanced productivity in everyday computing and intensive multi-tasking applications. Perfect for notebooks, the Core Series is ideal for energy-efficient mobile computing to extend battery life, increase access time, and provide a durable alternative to conventional hard disc drives with superior shock resistance. High capacities and low power consuming NAND flash technology provide the necessary performance and battery life boosts generated by the proliferation of mobile gaming and new ultra-thin laptops. With fast access and seek times combined with excellent reliability, the OCZ Core Series SSDs are the answer for consumers demanding this latest storage technology.</p>
<p>The drives feature a durable yet lightweight alloy housing, and because OCZ SSDs have no moving parts, the drives are not prone to damage from common mishandling. Designed for ultimate reliability, these SSDs have an excellent 1.5 million hour mean time before failure (MTBF) ensuring peace of mind over the long term. All Core Series SSD drives come backed a two year warranty and OCZ&#8217;s legendary service and support.</p>
<p>Core series SSD drives are available in capacities of 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB and deliver incredible 120-143Mbs/ 80-93Mbs read/write speeds and seek times of less than 0.35ms, making the Core series up to 10x as fast on a seek-time basis and up to 40% faster on a R/W basis that the best performing 2.5&#8243; HDDs on the market, all while consuming 50% less power. MSRPs at time of launch are USD $169, $259 and $479 for 32GB, 64GB and 128GB models respectively.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/sub500_128gb_drive_from_ocz_may_be_the_ssd_youve_been_saving_for-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic HPX-170 P2 Camera is Solid State, HD, Handheld</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/panasonic_hpx170_p2_camera_is_solid_state_hd_handheld-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/panasonic_hpx170_p2_camera_is_solid_state_hd_handheld-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Addy Dugdale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/panasonic_hpx170_p2_camera_is_solid_state_hd_handheld-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NAB in Las Vegas saw the unveiling of Panasonic&#8217;s HPX-170 P2 solid-state camera. The 1080p camcorder has the widest zoom lens in its class, a 13x Leica Dicomar with 28mm wide-angle setting, and an SDI interface, all in a 1.2kg body. Full press release of the HPX-170 P2 after the jump.



LAS VEGAS, NV (April 13, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/PANASONIC_HPX_170_1.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none"/>NAB in Las Vegas saw the unveiling of Panasonic&#8217;s HPX-170 P2 solid-state camera. The 1080p camcorder has the widest zoom lens in its class, a 13x Leica Dicomar with 28mm wide-angle setting, and an SDI interface, all in a 1.2kg body. Full press release of the HPX-170 P2 after the jump.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital cameras, gadgets, hpx-170, nab 2008, p2, panasonic, panasonic hpx-170 p2, solid state, solid-state, vegas --><br />
<span id="more-285261"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/PANASONIC_HPX_170_003.jpg" class="centre image800" width="800" /></p>
<blockquote><p>LAS VEGAS, NV (April 13, 2008 ) &#8211; Panasonic unveiled here at NAB the AG-HPX170, a fully solid-state P2 HD handheld camcorder. A full production quality tool, the solid-state handheld camcorder enables high definition and standard definition recording, the widest zoom lens in its class, and a HD-SDI interface for connection to baseband production and distribution infrastructure, all in a lightweight 4.2-pound body.
<p>Fully solid-state, the two-slot HPX170 is a 1080p capable camcorder that offers the compelling advantages of P2 technology including: no moving parts unlike tape, hard disk drive, or disc-based systems; instant random access to recorded HD or SD content; a faster IT compatible file-based workflow; and the ability to operate in harsh environments with resistance to temperature extremes, shock and vibration.</p>
<p>Building on the success of the AG-HVX200, the HPX170 is equipped with new advanced 1/3-inch 16:9 3-CCDs and a high-performance digital signal processor with 14-bit A/D conversion and 19-bit processing to deliver broadcast-quality, independent frame recordings. The HPX170 offers a 13X Leica Dicomar zoom lens with a 28mm wide-angle setting (the widest in its class) and a cam-driven manual zoom for smooth, easy and precise operation. For added flexibility, the camera provides auto or manual focus and iris.</p>
<p>The multi-format camera records in 20 HD and SD formats; in a variety of 1080i and 720p formats in DVCPRO HD, in 480i in DVCPRO50 and DVCPRO, and in 480i in DV. It&#8217;s switchable between 16:9/4:3 aspect ratios. The HPX170 offers a 20-step frame rate selection in 720p mode for variable-speed shooting in the 12fps to 60fps range to acquire fast- or slow-motion in-camera effects. For added creative flexibility, professionals can select from a variety of advanced gamma functions and settings including a CineGammaTM mode.</p>
<p>With its two P2 card slots, users can record up to 64 continuous minutes of the highest quality DVCPRO HD recording using currently available 32GB P2 cards. Record times will double with the release of Panasonic&#8217;s 64GB P2 card in the fall. Other user-friendly recording modes include hot swapping for non-stop recording, loop record, pre-record, interval and one-shot recording. A time/date stamp function makes it ideal for use in law enforcement environments.</p>
<p>The HPX170 is equipped with an HD/SD-SDI output standard for live feed productions as well as for editing and monitoring. It also has IEEE 1394 and USB 2.0 interfaces for fast P2 content transfer into NLE systems, and offers a composite output, component output (mini D-terminal) and a time-code setting via IEEE 1394. The camera also features a built-in stereo microphone and two-channel XLR audio input terminals supporting 48V phantom power supply with a selectable mic/line; and manual audio level volume (two-channel). Other convenient operational features include clip preview on the camera&#8217;s 3.5&#8243; colour LCD monitor; instant recording startup, scene files, assignable user buttons, focus assist and a camera remote function.</p>
<p>The AG-HPX170 will be available in fall 2008. It will be covered by Panasonic&#8217;s five-year limited P2 HD warranty*.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com//en/news-15826-Panasonic+Announces+the+New+HPX-170+P2+Video+Camera.html">Akihabara News</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/panasonic_hpx170_p2_camera_is_solid_state_hd_handheld-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alienware Puts 64GB of SSD in Their Desktop PCs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/alienware_puts_64gb_of_ssd_in_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/alienware_puts_64gb_of_ssd_in_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/alienware_puts_64gb_of_ssd_in_.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#8217;re not the first&#8212;Falcon NW had the blazing fast MTron SSD in their Mach V a month ago, says buddy Gordon from Max PC&#8212;but Alienware has just started offering 64GB of SSD in their Aurora ALX and Area-51 ALX desktops. [Alienware]
AU: Of course, Alienware is still MIA here in Australia &#8211; we&#8217;ve made repeated attempts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="aurora_alx.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/aurora_alx.jpeg" width="249" height="218" class="left"/>They&#8217;re not the first&mdash;Falcon NW had the blazing fast MTron SSD in their <a href="http://www.falcon-nw.com/config/machv.asp">Mach V</a> a month ago, says buddy Gordon from <a href="http://maximumpc.com">Max PC</a>&mdash;but Alienware has just started offering 64GB of SSD in their Aurora ALX and Area-51 ALX desktops. [<a href="http://www.alienware.com/ALX_pages/choose_alx.aspx">Alienware</a>]</p>
<blockquote class="au"><p>AU: Of course, Alienware is still MIA here in Australia &#8211; we&#8217;ve made repeated attempts to contact, and even local reps for Dell have indicated things are very thin here for that brand (it is still very much a separate entity). Considering the site still says &#8216;coming soon&#8217; for P2 chassis desktops (as it has for many, many months) and it also &#8216;recommends Vista Home Premium&#8217;&#8230; lets just look on at the US and look forward to Dell whipping things into shape in future. <span class="byline">-SB</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-253212"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/alienware_puts_64gb_of_ssd_in_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Among Many Fast SDHC Cards,  Only One Is King of Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/among_many_fast_sdhc_cards_onl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/among_many_fast_sdhc_cards_onl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/among_many_fast_sdhc_cards_onl.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review by Gizmodo contributor Curtis Walker
SDHC, or Secure Digital High Capacity, finally lets SD break the 2GB barrier and compete with Compact Flash for capacity. Only a handful of new devices are compatible with SDHC, and there&#8217;s really no support for legacy gear. This means you can&#8217;t even put them into your computer&#8217;s SD card [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="SDHC_cards2.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/SDHC_cards2.jpg" width="478" height="80" class="center" /><i>Review by Gizmodo contributor Curtis Walker</i><br />
SDHC, or Secure Digital High Capacity, finally lets SD break the 2GB barrier and compete with Compact Flash for capacity. Only a handful of new devices are compatible with SDHC, and there&#8217;s really no support for legacy gear. This means you can&#8217;t even put them into your computer&#8217;s SD card slot. You need a special reader which, most cards come with. As grim as that sounds, SDHC is a welcome step-up for people who have newer DSLR&#8217;s like Nikon&#8217;s D80 or video recorders like Canon&#8217;s high-def TX1. I entered nine of them into my own personal laptop-and-camera Battlemodo arena to determine compatibility and raw blistering speed.<span id="more-249001"></span>Capacity is important, but so is speed. That&#8217;s where the SDHC Class system comes into play. Previously, customers were presented with cards ranging from 66x to 150x, without any real guarantee of performance because there was no standard way of determining what 1x actually was. Currently, there are three classes: 2, 4 and 6, which relate directly to the minimum write speed of the card: 2 MB/s, 4 MB/s and 6 MB/s. Finally, there&#8217;s an official industry standard. Unfortunately, this system only defines minimum speeds, which is good and all, but we&#8217;re kinda more interested in <i>maximum speeds</i>. The faster the write speed of card, the quicker the shooting and transfer of images/videos off the card for editing.</p>
<p><b>The contenders:</b><br />
Class 4<br />
Delkin eFilm Pro 4GB C4 card they claim 150x speed &#8211; $60<br />
PNY 8GB C4 card &#8211; $85<br />
RiData Lightning Series 4GB C4 card &#8211; $50<br />
SanDisk Ultra II 4GB C4 card with reader &#8211; $70</p>
<p>Class 6<br />
ATP ProMax 4GB C6 card with included reader &#8211; $75<br />
Dane-Elec 133 Xs 4GB C6 card &#8211; $35<br />
Kingston 8GB C6 card with optional 15-in-1 reader &#8211; $100 and $15 respectively<br />
Lexar Professional 133x 4GB C6 card with included reader &#8211; $100<br />
Patriot 8GB C6 card &#8211; $75</p>
<p>I skipped Class 2, but as a basis for comparison, I threw in an old beater Lexar 1GB SD.</p>
<p>Even price turned out to be an unreliable measure of performance when put through my testing gauntlet. My street price searching found the Dane-Elec card to be the cheapest card of all, and it&#8217;s a fast Class 6.</p>
<p><b>Benchmark testing:</b><br />
I ran tests using each card in each of the four included SDHC readers both on a generic PC desktop and a MacBook. On the PC side, I created a 188MB folder containing 20 Nikon Raw images and timed how long it took to write the files to the card. On the MacBook, I used the benchmarking software XBench to see who had the fastest writes. (Longer is better, since we&#8217;re talking bandwidth, MB/s, here. You can see how all Class 6 cards have 6 MB/s transfer speeds, but you can also see how some have maximums in the teens.)<br />
<img alt="Mac-and-PC-results.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/Mac-and-PC-results.jpg" width="478" height="256" class="center" /><br />
<b>Real world testing:</b><br />
Finally, I wanted to see what difference all of this actually meant in the real world, so I loaded each card into a Nikon D80 and shot 20 raw images while timing it. The D80 can only shoot 6 raw images at full resolution before the buffer fills up, therefore the fastest card should allow for a faster 7th image, and that&#8217;s exactly what I found. The RiData card took over twice as long as the fastest card, the Lexar Pro. I was especially disappointed to see that old 1GB card beat all but three of the newer hotter cards in real-world usage!<br />
<img alt="D80.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/D80.jpg" width="478" height="384" class="center" /><br />
<b>Conclusion:</b><br />
The clear winner in Class 4 is the SanDisk Ultra II, which managed to perform on par with the Class 6 offerings from Kingston and PNY. That should tell you that, if you&#8217;re going SDHC, go Class 6. The winner there is a close call with Lexar and ATP fighting for top spot. But when all is said and done, Lexar is King of Speed, and even though the price is a little high, the included memory card reader is a better product. If you&#8217;re strapped for cash, you might look at the ATP or better still, go with the Dane-Elec card. It has no reader, so you&#8217;ll have to figure that out on your own, but it does have a sweet price to performance ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/among_many_fast_sdhc_cards_onl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
