<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; soldiers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/soldiers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mini Radar Will Give Soldiers Eyes In The Back Of Their Helmets</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mini-radar-will-give-soldiers-eyes-in-the-back-of-their-helmets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mini-radar-will-give-soldiers-eyes-in-the-back-of-their-helmets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helmets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hmrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The military is developing a miniature helmet-mounted radar system (HMRS) that will alert soldiers to any threats that might be sneaking up on them within a 25-metre radius. Although, brain tumours are sneakier than ninjas flying in stealth bombers.
Supposedly, the radar will be able to see through fog and dust &#8212; even walls. It&#8217;s also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/army-man-radar-helmet.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_army-man-radar-helmet.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The military is developing a miniature helmet-mounted radar system (HMRS) that will alert soldiers to any threats that might be sneaking up on them within a 25-metre radius. Although, brain tumours are sneakier than ninjas flying in stealth bombers.<span id="more-363272"></span></p>
<p>Supposedly, the radar will be able to see through fog and dust &mdash; even walls. It&#8217;s also compact enough to be practical &mdash; no more than 1kg with less than 0.5kg of hardware actually mounted to the helmet. Sounds like an awesome tool to keep our soldiers safe, but there are a few problems that would need to be addressed. Outside of possible health issues, the radar helmet would need to be able to distinguish enemies from friends and woodland creatures. Plus, the power supply feeding the device would need to be compact and powerful. That&#8217;s easier said than done of course, so I wouldn&#8217;t expect this technology to see action anytime soon. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/10/army-develops-helmet-mounted-radar-to-watch-soldiers-backs/">Danger Room</a> Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kylemay/1800643707/">Flickr</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mini-radar-will-give-soldiers-eyes-in-the-back-of-their-helmets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AR Goggles Give Real-Life +50% Speed Boost To Marine Mechanics</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ar-goggles-give-real-life-50-speed-boost-to-marine-mechanics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ar-goggles-give-real-life-50-speed-boost-to-marine-mechanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s like a real-life Starcraft perk for mechanics repairing armoured vehicles: Marine mechanics, assisted by augmented-reality goggles with a heads-up display, repaired light armoured vehicles up to 46 per cent faster.
The HUD replaces technical manuals on a bulky laptop with floating instructions, labels and oh yes, 3D models of tools right in front of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/armechanics.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_armechanics.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It&#8217;s like a real-life Starcraft perk for mechanics repairing armoured vehicles: Marine mechanics, assisted by augmented-reality goggles with a heads-up display, repaired light armoured vehicles up to 46 per cent faster.<span id="more-363020"></span></p>
<p>The HUD replaces technical manuals on a bulky laptop with floating instructions, labels and oh yes, 3D models of tools right in front of the mechanic. The wrist-mounted interface is run off an Android-powered G1 (which looks much cooler as gauntlet). Apparently Android&#8217;s seeing a lot of <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/android-gets-drafted/">use as a tool of war</a>. You can check out a <a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid42529855001?bctid=46069656001">video of it here</a>. [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23800/?a=f">Technology Review</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-10/augmented-reality-goggles-make-marine-mechanics-twice-efficient">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ar-goggles-give-real-life-50-speed-boost-to-marine-mechanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remainders &#8211; Things We Didn&#8217;t Post</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/remainders-things-we-didnt-post-51/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/remainders-things-we-didnt-post-51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of jediism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed-209]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infantry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jedi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obi wan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[se]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swedish chef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[username password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Robots Killed People, Soldiers Wouldn&#8217;t Have To&#8230;Sweden Disappears from the Internet For a Day&#8230;Over 95% of People Screw Up Username and Password&#8230;Founder of Jedi Religion &#8220;Intimidated&#8221; By Shopkeepers

Oh ED, you&#8217;re a lifesaver! A general who lead an infantry division in Iraq recently said that of the 155 men killed in combat, 122 could have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Robots Killed People, Soldiers Wouldn&#8217;t Have To&#8230;Sweden Disappears from the Internet For a Day&#8230;Over 95% of People Screw Up Username and Password&#8230;Founder of Jedi Religion &#8220;Intimidated&#8221; By Shopkeepers<span id="more-360166"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ED-209.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
Oh ED, you&#8217;re a lifesaver! A general who lead an infantry division in Iraq recently said that of the 155 men killed in combat, 122 could have lived if autonomous robots were doing the shooting instead. (Strangely, the other 33 would have died whether robots were around or not.) Replacing infantrymen with robots is a no brainer if you want to save your own boys, but Smokey from <em>The Big Lebowski</em> would probably say if nothing did the killing, even more lives would be spared. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/10/general-iraqs-robot-lack-killed-122-gis/">Wired</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Swedish_Chef_Disappears.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
Am I reading this right? Slashdot says the entire domain .se&mdash;a million souls, I mean sites&mdash;up and vanished from the internet. Some didn&#8217;t deliver successful replies for more than a day. Maybe I need to call Tim Berners-Lee for interpretation, but I don&#8217;t get why more people aren&#8217;t freaked out that an entire country up and disappeared, even if it was just for a moment. [<a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/10/13/1537207/Entirenobr-wbrnobrSE-TLD-Drops-Off-the-Internet">Slashdot</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Password_login_thing.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
Someone did a comprehensive study of 836 people to see how people managed to keep username/password logins straight in their head. The test noted that only 4.4% of people showed no &#8220;deviations&#8221; from the ideal password rules, deviations including jotting down the password, reusing it time and again, using a deliberately short password or&mdash;and here&#8217;s probably where most people failed-having no mix of characters and <em>symbols</em>. Having &#8220;best practices&#8221; that insanely rigid probably upped the failure rate substantially, but I think the important thing here&mdash;as Ars points out&mdash;is that the username/password system is a joke to begin with. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2009/10/30-years-of-failure-the-user-namepassword-combination.ars">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Obi_wan_ashamed.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
The 23-year-old guy who founded the International Church of Jediism obviously needs to watch Star Wars a few more times. The other day, he wore his hood into a supermarket and got yelled at something fierce. His very Jedi response? To run to the press and cry like a little bitch:</p>
<blockquote><p> They said: &#8216;Take it off&#8217;, and I said: &#8216;No, its part of my religion. It&#8217;s part of my religious right.&#8217; I gave them a Jedi church business card.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> No lightsabers, no waving of the hand in the air, not even <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_ekugPKqFw">&#8220;Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!&#8221;</a> Just a business card? He continues:</p>
<blockquote><p> They weren&#8217;t listening to me and were rude. They had three people around me. It was intimidating.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> &#8220;Inimidating&#8221;? For a Jedi? Just remember, intimidation leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. Don&#8217;t look now, but I think someone&#8217;s headed for the Dark Side. [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/18/jedi-religion-tesco-hood-jones">Guardian UK</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/remainders-things-we-didnt-post-51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNICEF&#8217;s Toy Soldiers To Help Real Kids</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/unicefs-toy-soldiers-to-help-real-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/unicefs-toy-soldiers-to-help-real-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unicef]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UNICEF&#8217;s direct mail campaign has put a teary smile on my face. They&#8217;re sending out baggies of what appear to be lil&#8217; plastic toy soldiers, but are in actually playing children, reminders of young&#8217;uns forced into battle in Africa.
This direct mail campaign is incredibly effective in how it brings forth childhood memories for many while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Toy_Soldiers3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Toy_Soldiers3.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>UNICEF&#8217;s direct mail campaign has put a teary smile on my face. They&#8217;re sending out baggies of what appear to be lil&#8217; plastic toy soldiers, but are in actually playing children, reminders of young&#8217;uns forced into battle in Africa.<span id="more-359251"></span></p>
<p>This direct mail campaign is incredibly effective in how it brings forth childhood memories for many while emphasising the reality of those who may never have one: Child soldiers in countries such as Africa. The campaign may be aiming to find corporate sponsorships, but they&#8217;ve earned a cheque from me, too. [<a href="http://directdaily.blogspot.com/2009/10/unicef-toy-soldiers.html">Direct Daily</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/Toy_Soldiers2_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/Toy_Soldiers2_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/Toy_Soldiers1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/Toy_Soldiers1.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/unicefs-toy-soldiers-to-help-real-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMU&#8217;s Robotic Arm Helps Medics Assist Wounded Soldiers Without Being in the Line of Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/cmus_robotic_arm_helps_medics_assist_wounded_soldiers_without_being_in_the_line_of_fire-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/cmus_robotic_arm_helps_medics_assist_wounded_soldiers_without_being_in_the_line_of_fire-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/cmus_robotic_arm_helps_medics_assist_wounded_soldiers_without_being_in_the_line_of_fire-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have developed a robotic arm that can be controlled remotely and help medics assist wounded soldiers that can&#8217;t be carried off the battlefield.


Howie Choset, an associate professor at CMU, engineered the robotic arm with various sensors so it can monitor and assess a soldier&#8217;s condition. The are detectors on it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/snakebot_x220.jpg" />Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have developed a robotic arm that can be controlled remotely and help medics assist wounded soldiers that can&#8217;t be carried off the battlefield.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: biotechnology, battlefield, carnegie mellon, choset, cmu, cmu snake bot, howie choset, lstat, robotic arm, snake bot, soldiers, war --><br />
<span id="more-325573"></span>
<p>Howie Choset, an associate professor at CMU, engineered the robotic arm with various sensors so it can monitor and assess a soldier&#8217;s condition. The are detectors on it can determine if a person is breathing. Eventually Choset hopes to attach an ultrasound that would allow the arm to detect internal bleeding. An oxygen mask can also be attached the robotic arm. Controlled wirelessly though a joystick, the arm has multiple joints allowing it to flex, retract and twist, allowing it the flexibility to do different tasks. </p>
<p>The team is collaborating with the U.S. Army&#8217;s Life Support for Trauma and Transport system (LSTAT), a stretcher that is a basically a portable intensive-care unit that is being used in Iraq and Afghanistan. The problem with the LSTAT is that it&#8217;s sensors need to be moved by hand and assisting medics on the battlefield would be easy targets, something that the snake bot could help solve. Still the uses of the snake bot aren&#8217;t limited to just biotechnology: Choset hopes to apply it to search and rescues, surgical procedures, bridge inspections, bomb disarming and more. [<a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~biorobotics/serpentine/serpentine.html">CMU</a> via <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22045/page2/">Technology Review</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/cmus_robotic_arm_helps_medics_assist_wounded_soldiers_without_being_in_the_line_of_fire-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Military Wants Virtual Parents For Children of Deployed Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_military_wants_virtual_parents_for_children_of_deployed_soldiers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_military_wants_virtual_parents_for_children_of_deployed_soldiers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creepy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_military_wants_virtual_parents_for_children_of_deployed_soldiers-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would think that a webcam would be sufficient, but basic teleconferencing solutions to the problem of deployed mums and dads is not enough for the military. They want to go virtual. 


Specifically, the Pentagon is soliciting proposals to &#8220;develop a highly interactive PC or Web-based application to allow family members to verbally interact with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/laptopkkid.jpg" />You would think that a webcam would be sufficient, but basic teleconferencing solutions to the problem of deployed mums and dads is not enough for the military. They want to go virtual. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: creepy, computers, deployed soldiers, interactive, military, software, virtual parents --><br />
<span id="more-321776"></span>
<p>Specifically, the Pentagon is soliciting proposals to &#8220;develop a highly interactive PC or Web-based application to allow family members to verbally interact with &#8216;virtual&#8217; renditions of deployed Service Members.&#8221; </p>
<p>Parameters include:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The child should be able to have a simulated conversation with a parent about generic, everyday topics,&#8221; the solicitation says. &#8220;For instance, a child may get a response from saying, &#8216;I love you,&#8217; or &#8216;I miss you,&#8217; or &#8216;Good night mommy/daddy.&#8217; This is a technologically challenging application because it relies on the ability to have convincing voice-recognition, artificial intelligence, and the ability to easily and inexpensively develop a customised application tailored to a specific parent.&#8221; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Like other <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/darpa/">DARPA</a>-esque endeavours, this task is much easier said than done. And, to be honest, I don&#8217;t know what to make of it. I understand that deployed parents might not have internet access at all times, but this solution seems preposterous and costly when compared to, say Skype. On the other hand, its kind of touching&mdash;like the military&#8217;s awkward cloak-wearing, bony-fingered way of expressing compassion. [<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=D2JLUYUP4E5GWQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=212700457&#038;_requestid=651196">Information Week</a> via <a href="http://www.medgadget.com/archives/2009/01/military_aims_to_design_virtual_moms_and_dads.html">Medgadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_military_wants_virtual_parents_for_children_of_deployed_soldiers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. Army&#8217;s Secret Weapon: The iPod Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/us_army_uses_ipod_touch_for_translation_on_the_field-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/us_army_uses_ipod_touch_for_translation_on_the_field-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/us_army_uses_ipod_touch_for_translation_on_the_field-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[newVideoPlayer("/ipodmilitary_giz.flv", 506, 423,"");This week on the Pentagon Channel (?), a soldier demonstrates the Army&#8217;s cutting-edge new translation tool: an iPod touch.


The demo iPod looks to have the stock Apple OS, running a custom translation application. It allows the user to select a language, then a situation, and finally a command or question, like &#8220;Get down!&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript">newVideoPlayer("/ipodmilitary_giz.flv", 506, 423,"");</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/ipodmilitary_giz.flv.jpg" style="display: none;" />This week on the Pentagon Channel (?), a soldier demonstrates the Army&#8217;s cutting-edge new translation tool: an iPod touch.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: military distraction, apple, army, iphone, ipod, ipod touch, military, soldier, touch --><br />
<span id="more-320616"></span>
<p>The demo iPod looks to have the stock Apple OS, running a custom translation application. It allows the user to select a language, then a situation, and finally a command or question, like &#8220;Get down!&#8221; in Arabic, which I&#8217;m sure comes in handy. The app will also show a video of a CGI soldier saying the selection, in case your platoon is made up of visual learners. It&#8217;s a pretty cool little program, but I hope the soldiers actually use it instead of playing <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/list_of_most_downloaded_iphone_apps_is_full_of_frivolous_crap-2.html">Tap Tap Revenge</a> like I&#8217;m sure they want to. [<a href="http://pentagontv.feedroom.com/index.jsp?auto_band=x&#038;rf=sv&#038;fr_story=34e7fb6a548637a3279647620e74e81dab8426d7">The Pentagon Channel</a>, <em>thanks Paul!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/us_army_uses_ipod_touch_for_translation_on_the_field-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army Using TiVo Tech for the Most Un-TiVo of Purposes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/army_using_tivo_tech_for_the_most_untivo_of_purposes-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/army_using_tivo_tech_for_the_most_untivo_of_purposes-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/army_using_tivo_tech_for_the_most_untivo_of_purposes-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US troops in Japan are getting a massive server array to improve their TV. But instead of delivering what-you-want/when-you-want programming like TiVo, the servers will simply bump all shows 9 hours ahead. See any problems?


Part of me is happy for the Army and Air Force troops at the Yokota Air Base in Japan. I am [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/Uncle_Sam_TiVo.jpg" />US troops in Japan are getting a massive server array to improve their TV. But instead of delivering what-you-want/when-you-want programming like TiVo, the servers will simply bump all shows 9 hours ahead. See any problems?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: time shifting, japan, military, servers, tivo, us air force, us army, us troops --><br />
<span id="more-317935"></span>
<p>Part of me is happy for the Army and Air Force troops at the Yokota Air Base in Japan. I am all for taxpayer dollars going to improve our overseas troops&#8217; American TV watching experience (even if <i>Heroes</i> has crashed and burned, at least <i>Fringe</i> is there to take its place). But this seems like a form of suppression: The channels playback in realtime, 9 hours later. As far as I can tell, you can&#8217;t even fast-forward through commercials, let alone the hours of crap TV in between the good bits.</p>
<p>Each of the 33 channels gets its own dedicated server, so why can&#8217;t each channel timeshift at the whim of whoever&#8217;s watching that particular channel? Give our boys (and girls) in uniform a damned remote, Uncle Sam! I&#8217;m pretty sure they&#8217;ve earned it.</p>
<p>If this was a true rant, I&#8217;d get more into this &#8220;9 hours ahead&#8221; business. Sure, it&#8217;s showing American TV at the Japanese prime time, but if my calculations are correct, it&#8217;s a day off. Which means they get Thursday&#8217;s Must See TV on <i>Friday night</i>? I&#8217;ll take Liz Lemon any day of the week, but making people wait till Monday to see <i>Amazing Race</i>, that&#8217;s just cruel and unusual. That said, at least sports and news will be broadcast in realtime. [<a href="http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&#038;article=59211&#038;source=rss">Stars and Stripes</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13846_3-10114175-62.html">CNet</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/army_using_tivo_tech_for_the_most_untivo_of_purposes-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PISCES Exoskeletons Turn Every Solider Into Aquaman</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/pisces_exoskeletons_turn_every_solider_into_aquaman-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/pisces_exoskeletons_turn_every_solider_into_aquaman-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoskeletons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pisces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/pisces_exoskeletons_turn_every_solider_into_aquaman-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently the military has been working with West Florida&#8217;s Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) for several years trying to develop an underwater exoskeleton that would improve a soldier&#8217;s speed and endurance underwater. Much like early pioneers of flight, IHMC has looked to nature to provide answers. So far, the project known as Performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/pisces-exoskeletons.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />Apparently the military has been working with West Florida&#8217;s Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) for several years trying to develop an underwater <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/exoskeletons/">exoskeleton</a> that would improve a soldier&#8217;s speed and endurance underwater. Much like early pioneers of flight, IHMC has looked to nature to provide answers. So far, the project known as Performance Improving Self Contained Exoskeleton for Swimming (&#8221;PISCES&#8221;) has investigated how dolphins, sea turtles and penguins move through the water. Not surprisingly, the results have been&#8230;a little odd.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: exoskeletons, fin, fins, ihmc, military, performance improving self contained exoskeleton for swimming, pisces, robots, swim, swimming, water --><br />
<span id="more-306771"></span>
<p>The images above illustrate two design concepts: the first is focused on amplifying a swimmer&#8217;s lower body movements in the water&mdash;like a motorised version of swim fins. The second concept goes a little further by attempting to mimic how a penguin uses its upper body to swim. Apparently the project is still in development, and since the image illustrates that the motorised lower body fin has actually been tested, I am going to assume that is the direction they have decided to pursue. That&#8217;s probably for the best. [<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;source=web&#038;ct=res&#038;cd=1&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ihmc.us%2F&#038;ei=43DSSLqdIJXovQWUl7nZCA&#038;usg=AFQjCNHqJBpMODrTL84yfUA7cyckFvK1nA&#038;sig2=-EQVYZoronVvTNRuW9IJPA">IHMC</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/09/attack-of-the-u.html">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/pisces_exoskeletons_turn_every_solider_into_aquaman-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futuristic Dinosaur Eel Fish Armour Would Protect Soldiers With Scales, Sans Smelly Odours</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/futuristic_dinosaur_eel_fish_armour_would_protect_soldiers_with_scales_sans_smelly_odors-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/futuristic_dinosaur_eel_fish_armour_would_protect_soldiers_with_scales_sans_smelly_odors-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/futuristic_dinosaur_eel_fish_armour_would_protect_soldiers_with_scales_sans_smelly_odors-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team of MIT engineers is hoping to develop tomorrow&#8217;s body armour today with a fish whose family tree stretches back 96 million years. Called the Polypterus senegalus, or &#8220;dinosaur eel&#8221; to layman schlubs like me, this primitive fish still thrives in the muddy rivers of Africa, and has retained a full-body suit of armoured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/fish-2-enlarged.jpg" class="left">A team of MIT engineers is hoping to develop tomorrow&#8217;s body armour today with a fish whose family tree stretches back 96 million years. Called the Polypterus senegalus, or &#8220;dinosaur eel&#8221; to layman schlubs like me, this primitive fish still thrives in the muddy rivers of Africa, and has retained a full-body suit of armoured scales that was common on species of fish millions of years ago. For years scientists have known that the eel&#8217;s interlocking, millimeters-thick scales were capable of stopping penetrating attacks, but couldn&#8217;t figure out why. Now, thanks to nanotechnology and a grant from the U.S. Army (go Joe!), they&#8217;ve figured it out.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: fish armor, armor, army, body armor, dinosaur eel, mit, p. snegalus, soldiers, us army --><br />
<span id="more-300225"></span>
<p>The MIT engineers used nanotech to measure the thickness of a single scale (about 500 millionths of a meter thick), and decipher the makeup of its four different layer materials. They discovered that the materials, in tandem with the geometry and thickness of each layer, all contributed to a pretty amazing suit of armour.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/fish-armor-enlarged.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />They even tested the armour plating by &#8220;biting&#8221; scales that had been surgically removed from a living fish. What they discovered then was that P. senegalus armour will probably replace the bulky ceramic plates that adorn our fighting men and women in warzones today.</p>
<blockquote><p>The P. senegalus armour kept the crack localised by forcing it to run in a circle around the penetration site, rather than spreading through the entire scale and leading to catastrophic failure, like many ceramic materials.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lighter, thinner, <em>and</em> better? I think with those kinds of results soldiers and law enforcement officials alike could probably turn a blind eye to the fishy smell. Either that, or baking soda just became the next indispensable item in their arsenal next to bulletproof vests. [<a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/fish-armor-0727.html">MIT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/futuristic_dinosaur_eel_fish_armour_would_protect_soldiers_with_scales_sans_smelly_odors-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
