<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; silverlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rumour: Full Flash, Silverlight Coming To BlackBerry Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/rumour-full-flash-silverlight-coming-to-blackberry-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/rumour-full-flash-silverlight-coming-to-blackberry-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=347440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s pretty much a given that every major smartphone OS has Flash support in its sights, but BlackBerry and Adobe have been alarmingly mum on the subject. Today, Boy Genius, a certifiable BlackBerry nut, has news: It&#8217;s coming.
Unfortunately, he can&#8217;t get us a usefully specific release window beyond &#8220;by next summer&#8221; by which time Android, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/skyfire_blackberry.jpg" alt="" class="center" />It&#8217;s pretty much a given that every major smartphone OS has Flash support in its sights, but BlackBerry and Adobe have been <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/flash-for-android-webos-landing-in-october/">alarmingly mum</a> on the subject. Today, Boy Genius, a certifiable BlackBerry nut, has news: <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/08/19/rim-planning-on-including-full-flash-and-silverlight-support-in-browser/">It&#8217;s coming</a>.<span id="more-347440"></span></p>
<p>Unfortunately, he can&#8217;t get us a usefully specific release window beyond &#8220;by next summer&#8221; by which time Android, Windows Mobile and heck, maybe even the iPhone, will have been ridin&#8217; high on a wave of banner ads of choppy YouTube videos <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/flash-for-android-webos-landing-in-october/">for months</a>. But still, full Flash on BlackBerry!</p>
<p>Silverlight support is said to be in the cards too, though I&#8217;m pretty sure every suit with a BlackBerry would be a little happier if RIM just dropped that little project until Flash is done. Also, let&#8217;s put this into a little perpsective: BGR is just claiming that BlackBerry will have Flash within the next <em>year</em>. <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/skyfire/">Skyfire</a> can already play back almost all Flash content on BlackBerry handsets, so it&#8217;d be kind of pathetic if RIM <em>couldn&#8217;t</em> pull that off. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/08/19/rim-planning-on-including-full-flash-and-silverlight-support-in-browser/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/rumour-full-flash-silverlight-coming-to-blackberry-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Silverlight Now Supports GPU Video Acceleration</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/microsoft-silverlight-now-supports-gpu-video-acceleration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/microsoft-silverlight-now-supports-gpu-video-acceleration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download links are live for the latest version of Microsoft&#8217;s softly maligned not-Flash plugin, and they come bearing gifts. Ars breaks the new features down:
• Media: GPU hardware acceleration, new codec support (H.264, AAC, MPEG-4), raw bitstream Audio/Video API, and improved logging for media analytics
• Graphics: GPU Acceleration and hardware compositing, perspective 3D, bitmap and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Download links <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/07/silverlight-3-arrives-early.ars">are live </a>for the latest version of Microsoft&#8217;s softly maligned not-Flash plugin, and they come bearing gifts. Ars breaks the new features down:<span id="more-341078"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>• Media: GPU hardware acceleration, new codec support (H.264, AAC, MPEG-4), raw bitstream Audio/Video API, and improved logging for media analytics<br />
• Graphics: GPU Acceleration and hardware compositing, perspective 3D, bitmap and pixel API, pixel shader effects, and Deep Zoom improvements<br />
• Application development: Deep linking, navigation and SEO, improved text quality, multi-touch support, 60+ controls available, and library caching support<br />
• Data: Data-binding improvements, validation error templates, server data push improvements, binary XML networking support, and multi-tier REST data support </p>
</blockquote>
<p> That first one is far and away the most important, since high-bitrate HD streaming is well on its way to becoming the de facto standard for online video, and Flash kinda sucks at it. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/07/silverlight-3-arrives-early.ars">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/microsoft-silverlight-now-supports-gpu-video-acceleration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix Lays Off 50 Tech Support Workers Because Microsoft Silverlight Is So Easy To Use</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_lays_off_50_tech_support_workers_because_microsoft_silverlight_is_so_easy_to_use-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_lays_off_50_tech_support_workers_because_microsoft_silverlight_is_so_easy_to_use-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_lays_off_50_tech_support_workers_because_microsoft_silverlight_is_so_easy_to_use-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s entry of &#8220;WTF Really?&#8221;, we have a Netflix spokesperson saying that they have to lay off 50 of their &#8220;technical specialists&#8221; because Silverlight, Microsoft&#8217;s Flash-esque video player tech, is so damn easy to use.


It&#8217;s just a weird post on Netflix&#8217;s outward-facing blog. On the one hand, it&#8217;s bragging that their new player is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/macflix.jpg" class="center"/>In today&#8217;s entry of &#8220;WTF Really?&#8221;, we have a Netflix spokesperson saying that they have to lay off 50 of their &#8220;technical specialists&#8221; because Silverlight, Microsoft&#8217;s Flash-esque video player tech, is so damn easy to use.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: wtf really, layoffs, netflix, really, weird, wtf --><br />
<span id="more-318432"></span>
<p>It&#8217;s just a weird post on Netflix&#8217;s outward-facing blog. On the one hand, it&#8217;s bragging that their new player is so simple that fewer people need help setting it up. On the other hand, they&#8217;re talking about people being let go, which is strange, since they follow up with a line that says &#8220;&#8230;Netflix as a whole as we continue to add engineers and other positions throughout the company.&#8221;</p>
<p>That just leaves our reaction to Netflix&#8217;s announcement. WTF Really? [<a href="http://blog.netflix.com/2008/12/changes-in-customer-service.html">Netflix</a> via <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/gigaom/big-tech/2008_12_08_netflix_to_lay_off_50_blames_silverlight.html">CNN Gigaom</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_lays_off_50_tech_support_workers_because_microsoft_silverlight_is_so_easy_to_use-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix Watch Instantly For Mac Now Available For All Subscribers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_available_for_all_subscribers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_available_for_all_subscribers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_available_for_all_subscribers-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netflix&#8217;s Silverlight-based Watch Instantly feature for Macs is out of beta, and activated for all subscribers. The catalog still isn&#8217;t complete and the six machine limit stands, but good news is good news. [Netflix &#8212;Thanks, Ben!]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/macflix.jpg" />Netflix&#8217;s Silverlight-based <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_live_for_beta_users-2.html">Watch Instantly</a> feature for Macs is out of beta, and activated for all subscribers. The catalog still isn&#8217;t complete and the six machine limit stands, but good news is good news. [<a href="http://www.netflix.com/HowItWorks?lnkctr=ma08Thiw2">Netflix</a> <em>&mdash;Thanks, Ben!</em>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: netflix, mac, netflix watch instantly, netflix watch instantly for macs, silverlight, streaming --><br />
<span id="more-317694"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_available_for_all_subscribers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix Watch Instantly for Mac Now Live (for Beta Users)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_live_for_beta_users-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_live_for_beta_users-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_live_for_beta_users-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we reported last Sunday, Netflix Watch Instantly was &#8220;coming soon&#8221; for Mac users. Well, coming soon is today, dear readers. If you&#8217;re into being a beta user, head over to Netflix to opt in at the sign in page, and give her a try. Of course, there are a few things to understand before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/netflixmac_01.jpg" class="CENTER" style="display:block;float:none;" />As we reported last Sunday, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/netflix_streaming_video_finally_on_macs-2.html">Netflix Watch Instantly</a> was &#8220;coming soon&#8221; for Mac users. Well, coming soon is today, dear readers. If you&#8217;re into being a beta user, head over to Netflix to <a href="http://www.netflix.com/silverlightoptin.">opt in at the sign in page</a>, and give her a try. Of course, there are a few things to understand before you start streaming. You&#8217;ll need to download Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight; and Netflix is imposing a six machine limit (PC, set top, whatever). Additionally, not all movies are available for viewing through the Silverlight player. Still cool though. Bye-bye DVDs?[<a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/01/try-netflix-watch-instantly-on-your-mac-right-now/">Venture Beat</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: netflix watch instantly, apple, flash, mac, microsoft, movies, netflix, silverlight, streaming --><span id="more-313302"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/netflix_watch_instantly_for_mac_now_live_for_beta_users-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympics Watching: Ultimate PC/HDTV Strategy Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/olympics_watching_ultimate_pchdtv_strategy_guide-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/olympics_watching_ultimate_pchdtv_strategy_guide-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benny Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/olympics_watching_ultimate_pchdtv_strategy_guide-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Olympics have begun, and now that we&#8217;ve had a few days to digest the coverage, we&#8217;ve found the best (and worst) things about watching the games online and on your TV. Those of us stuck here in America and not lucky enough to own Vista must deal with NBC&#8217;s often delayed event broadcasts. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/Water_Polo_Olympic_Online_HDTV.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />The 2008 Olympics have <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/when_technology_becomes_art_photography_of_the_beijing_olympics_opening_ceremonies-2.html">begun</a>, and now that we&#8217;ve had a few days to digest the coverage, we&#8217;ve found the best (and worst) things about watching the games online and on your TV. Those of us stuck here in America and not <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/windows_media_centre_offers_olympics_on_the_go-2.html">lucky enough to own Vista</a> must deal with NBC&#8217;s often delayed event broadcasts. Sure, if it&#8217;s American basketball or track you&#8217;re looking for, you can find everything you need without stepping away from your HDTV set. But if you&#8217;ve waited four years to watch table tennis or want to see how that Latvia-Angola rivalry plays out, you&#8217;ll definitely have to use NBC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/player.html">streaming online player</a>. Here&#8217;s a rundown of the tradeoffs between HDTV and NBC&#8217;s online viewer, and some helpful tips to keep you from getting too mired in the programming.<br />
<blockquote>AU: Nice to know what the US is bitching about, when all we have is Yahoo!7&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('olympicplayer', 4, ''); </script></p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: olympics, feature, hdtv, microsoft, nbc, silverlight, streaming, television, top --><br />
<span id="more-301390"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/NBC_Olympics_Online_Vs_HD.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /><strong>Viewing Experience</strong><br /> The Silverlight-based player runs well&#8211;even on a Mac&#8211;but its interface has a few rough spots. When it comes to content, there is no comparison&#8211;the web player will stream <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/blogBurst/technology?type=technologyNews&#038;w1=B7ovpm21IaDoL40ZFnNfGe&#038;w2=B82x9Ksc5UNVzDjpITcIrRbi&#038;src=blogBurst_technologyNews&#038;bbPostId=B7oEosCc5gQ5BzJASogoqhN9B3aNjH29kqrVB80RfI0oXkf2&#038;bbParentWidgetId=B82x9Ksc5UNVzDjpITcIrRbi">2,200 hours of live video</a>, where for most sports, only glorified clip roundups will appear on the actual TV. Quality is a different story, as you&#8217;d expect. The streamed video is blurry no matter what size you watch it in, even though its at 720&#215;480&#8211;a far cry from full HD your TV can get. Also, while it&#8217;s understandable that NBC wouldn&#8217;t provide announcers on their streaming player for a North Korea vs. Nigeria soccer game, they <i>don&#8217;t have announcers for any USA sports online</i>, even big ones like basketball. Watching games without commentary can be painful, believe me. One more complaint: PowerPC Mac users are left out of the experience altogether, as Silverlight only supports Intel machines. [Thanks, downbythetracks!]<strong>Advantage: HDTV &#8211; Watch as much as you can on TV itself, but be aware of the delays.</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/olympictop494.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /></p>
<p><strong>Finding Content</strong><br /> When it comes to searching for live broadcasts, neither the streaming player nor HDTV are helpful at all. The TiVo guide says which sports will be shown, but doesn&#8217;t say if they are tape-delayed. To find that out, you&#8217;ll have to sort through NBC&#8217;s schedule, which displays &#8220;(LIVE ET/CT)&#8221; next to anything broadcast in real time. And sorry west-coasters; you&#8217;re totally SOL when it comes to live HDTV&mdash;everything is shown for you on a 3-hour tape delay.<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/enhancedplayer.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" />Then again, seeing the streaming player for the first time may tempt you to bust out the Rosetta Stone. It&#8217;s actually three players in one, starting with the standard player which is stuffed with ads, tabs, lists, menus and more. For this one, you&#8217;re best off browsing by channel (#1 in the pic up top), clicking the sport you&#8217;re interested in and seeing what videos are offered. A button in the corner of the video section (#2) directs you to the enhanced player, which is the best way to watch&#8211;it&#8217;s got a bigger video screen and is so frill and distraction-free even Frank Costanza <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festivus#The_Festivus_Pole">would approve</a>.</p>
<p>In the enhanced player, you can watch highlights (#3) and live content with picture-in-picture (#4), and swap between the two seamlessly. You can&#8217;t search for content in the enhanced player, so you must find it elsewhere and switch over. Finally, a button on the left (#5) takes you to the &#8220;Live Video Control Room&#8221; which offers the most hyped way to watch the sports you crave&#8211;four-channel multicasting. <strong>Advantage: Streaming player &#8211; It&#8217;s very convoluted, but you can&#8217;t argue with the amount of content on demand.</strong><br /> <img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/multicast.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /><strong>The Multi-Cast Experience</strong><br /> Gambling junkies and cubicle drones alike will love the streaming player&#8217;s multi-cast, which allows you to watch up to four events at once. For people trying to actually enjoy sports, the largest video is still too small to see a score, and the other three are barely the size of postage stamps. Swapping between games is easy, but if you expand one to the full-sized player, you lose your other streams, and have to to add them all over again when you return to the multi-cast. Also, sifting through content is unbearable; you can scroll through six videos at a time, but there are almost 200 up there right now, and there&#8217;s almost two weeks of competition left. Furthermore, you really need to make sure what you&#8217;re watching is actually live&mdash;even though the player looks like it is telling you what&#8217;s live, the schedule sometimes contradicts this.</p>
<p>HDTV has a multi-cast of its own, and it&#8217;s called &#8220;jumping from event to event&#8221;. Kudos to NBC&#8217;s Olympic editors&mdash;they seem to have an uncanny idea of when I get sick of gymnastics and want to switch over to volleyball. It&#8217;s not perfect, but it&#8217;s effortless and they do a good job with it. <strong>Advantage: Even &#8211; The streaming multi-cast is great in theory, but execution is pretty weak, though the ability to pick what you want to watch trumps HDTV.</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/listings494.jpg" style="display:block;" /><strong>Live Action</strong><br /> Figuring out what is live on TV is harder than figuring out what is live online. You generally have to read the fine print of NBC&#8217;s listings to find out what TV programs will be aired live. Helpful hint: If it doesn&#8217;t say live, then it&#8217;s probably not live. However, one advantage to HDTV is that you may have access to dedicated <a href="http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2008/nbc-olympic-basketball-soccer-channel/">live basketball and soccer</a> channels, depending on where you live. I just saw it for myself, and it&#8217;s not airing anything right now, but I have 12 hours of basketball to wake up to tomorrow and I haven&#8217;t been this excited in weeks.</p>
<p>You can sign up for alerts of both online and TV events via text message or e-mail. Those alerts don&#8217;t tell you which TV event is live. (On the flipside, alerts for online broadcast are mostly live, because otherwise they would already be available on demand.) The system sadly won&#8217;t allow you to set a repeating event by team or sport, but if there are games you MUST see&mdash;like USA and Spain basketball for me&mdash;this is the safest way to make sure you catch it all.</p>
<p>As seen with the <a href="http://nba.fanhouse.com/2008/08/10/nbcs-western-tape-delays-makes-no-sense/">USA-China basketball debacle</a>, NBC has no business delaying broadcasts for Pacific time. Thanks to the internet, this old broadcasting habit looks increasingly lame. After all, even those of us without the dedicated HD channels have TiVos and alarm clocks, right? Those who were shut out are not totally out of luck though&mdash;if you tell the online service that you have an East Coast cable carrier, it will stream broadcasts in real time to you at the appropriate Eastern Time. (If you are confused, just remember to say your zipcode is 10001, and your carrier is Time Warner Cable.) <b>Advantage: Streaming player &#8211; In some cases, the only way half the country can see things live is through the online system.</b></p>
<p><strong>The Final Word</strong><br /> NBC&#8217;s done a fair job with their streaming player and satisfied years of pent-up frustration by serving such an unprecedented amount of Olympic coverage. But by trying to make things easier, the network seems to have made our lives harder. Diehards of weird sports like fencing or those who need their content more live than Bill O&#8217;Reilly can get something from online that they could never get from the tube. But the quality isn&#8217;t great and using it feels obtuse.</p>
<p>On the other hand, HDTV looks great and has announcers, which is crucial despite its lack of coverage and antiquated tape delay. While the streaming player is a revolutionary leap forward in terms of content, I can&#8217;t help feeling that it isn&#8217;t 100% ready for these Olympics, and that the games are still built around your TV set. To get the most complete experience you need to use both, but if you have a DVR and don&#8217;t mind delay then stick to your HDTV as much as possible. [<a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/">NBC Olympics</a>]</p>
<p><i>By now you may already be an O<br />
lympic-level Olympics home viewer yourself. If you have any tips, tricks or usage scenarios that make watching the Olympics more easy or fun, by all means share them with us in comments.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/olympics_watching_ultimate_pchdtv_strategy_guide-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC&#8217;s Olympics Online Player Reviewed (Verdict: A Necessary Evil)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nbcs_olympics_online_player_reviewed_verdict_a_necessary_evil-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nbcs_olympics_online_player_reviewed_verdict_a_necessary_evil-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benny Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nbcs_olympics_online_player_reviewed_verdict_a_necessary_evil-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Olympics have already started, but those of us stuck here in America and not lucky enough to own Vista must deal with NBC&#8217;s often delayed event broadcasts. Sure, if it&#8217;s American basketball or track you&#8217;re looking for, you can find everything you need without stepping away from your HDTV set. But if you&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/olympictop494.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />The 2008 Olympics have already started, but those of us stuck here in America and <a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2008/08/windows_media_centre_offers_olympics_on_the_go-2.html">not lucky enough</a> to own Vista must deal with NBC&#8217;s often delayed event broadcasts. Sure, if it&#8217;s American basketball or track you&#8217;re looking for, you can find everything you need without stepping away from your HDTV set. But if you&#8217;ve waited four years to watch table tennis or want to see how that Latvia-Angola rivalry plays out, you&#8217;ll definitely have to use NBC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/player.html">streaming online player</a>. The Silverlight-based player runs well&mdash;even on a Mac&mdash;but it has a few rough spots when it comes to interface. If you want to make the best of your Olympic experience, here are the things you need to know.
<div class="photoGallery"><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/gallery/olympicplayer/olympicplayer0_medium.jpg" title="highlights.jpg" rel="lightbox[1657]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="highlights.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/olympicplayer/olympicplayer0_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/olympicplayer/olympicplayer1_medium.jpg" title="342342.jpg" rel="lightbox[1657]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="342342.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/olympicplayer/olympicplayer1_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/olympicplayer/olympicplayer2_medium.jpg" title="234023423.jpg" rel="lightbox[1657]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="234023423.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/olympicplayer/olympicplayer2_small.jpg" /></a></div>
</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: olympics, feature, microsoft, nbc, reviews, silverlight, streaming, top, video --><br />
<span id="more-301144"></span>
<p><strong>Streaming Player vs. HDTV</strong><br /> When it comes to content, there is no comparison&mdash;the web player will stream <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/blogBurst/technology?type=technologyNews&#038;w1=B7ovpm21IaDoL40ZFnNfGe&#038;w2=B82x9Ksc5UNVzDjpITcIrRbi&#038;src=blogBurst_technologyNews&#038;bbPostId=B7oEosCc5gQ5BzJASogoqhN9B3aNjH29kqrVB80RfI0oXkf2&#038;bbParentWidgetId=B82x9Ksc5UNVzDjpITcIrRbi">2,200 hours of live video</a>, where most of the stuff on TV will be glorified clip roundups of assorted events. But quality is a much different story. The streamed video is blurry no matter what size you watch it in, and even the full-size player is only about 720&#215;480, so standard def at best. Also, while it&#8217;s understandable that NBC wouldn&#8217;t provide announcers for a North Korea vs. Nigeria soccer game, there wasn&#8217;t any commentary for a match between USA and Norway either. We find it almost impossible to believe that major sports like US men&#8217;s basketball would go without someone calling the games, but based on what we&#8217;ve seen so far this may be the case.</p>
<p><strong>Finding Content</strong><br /> <img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/enhancedplayer.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" />Seeing the player for the first time may tempt you to bust out the Rosetta Stone. It&#8217;s actually three players in one, starting with the standard player which is stuffed with ads, tabs, lists, menus and more. For this one, you&#8217;re best off browsing by channel (#1 in the pic above), clicking the sport you&#8217;re interested in and seeing what videos are offered. A button in the corner of the video section (#2) directs you to the enhanced player, which is the best way to watch&mdash;it&#8217;s got a bigger video screen and is so frill and distraction-free even Frank Costanza <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festivus#The_Festivus_Pole">would approve</a>. In the enhanced player, you can watch highlights (#3) and live content with picture-in-picture (#4), and swap between the two seamlessly. Searching for content is hard to do in the enhanced player, so you&#8217;re better off finding it elsewhere and switching over. Finally, a button on the left (#5) takes you to the &#8220;Live Video Control Room&#8221; which offers the most hyped way to watch the sports you crave&mdash;four-channel multicasting.<br /> <strong><br /> The Multi-Cast Experience</strong><br /> <img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/multicast.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" />Gambling junkies and cubicle drones alike will love the multi-cast, which allows you to watch up to four events at once. For people trying to actually enjoy the sports, the largest video is still too small to see a score, and the other three are barely the size of postage stamps. Swapping between games is easy, but if you expand one to the full-sized player, you lose your other streams, and have to to add them all over again when you return to the multi-cast. Also, sifting through content is shaping up to be unbearable; you can scroll through about five games at a time, which is fine when there are only 16 available, but what will we do when there are hundreds of videos to sift through, by early next week?</p>
<p><strong>The Final Word</strong><br /> NBC&#8217;s done a fair job so far with their streaming player and by offering up an unprecedented amount of Olympic coverage. But by trying to make things easier, the network seems to have made them harder. It&#8217;s decent for diehards of weird sports like fencing or those who need their content more live than Bill O&#8217;Reilly. But using it feels obtuse, like it&#8217;s the bastard love child of Windows Vista and Symbian. However, Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight is not to blame&mdash;you can&#8217;t even detect the difference from Flash. It&#8217;s all about content management: At this point there are increasingly vast amounts of material, some live, some taped and mostly impossible to tell the difference, which may even be shockingly announcer-free. Maybe NBC will figure this stuff out when the games really get rolling, but for now it&#8217;ll have to settle for a Bronze. [<a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/">NBC Olympics</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nbcs_olympics_online_player_reviewed_verdict_a_necessary_evil-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>19th Century Blogs Now Available Online</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/19th_century_blogs_now_available_online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/19th_century_blogs_now_available_online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/19th_century_blogs_now_available_online.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have noticed that we&#8217;ve got a bit of a Windows Vista takeover happening at the moment on Gizmodo. Part of that is having a hub dedicated to Vista, where Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Professional Geek&#8221; Nick Hodge is blogging about helpful Vista features. One of the things he&#8217;s mentioned &#8211; Turning the Pages 2.0 &#8211; is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.flickr.com/3117/2564112264_27e0b32c65.jpg" class="center" /><br />You may have noticed that we&#8217;ve got a bit of a Windows Vista takeover happening at the moment on Gizmodo. Part of that is having a hub dedicated to Vista, where Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Professional Geek&#8221; Nick Hodge is blogging about helpful Vista features. One of the things he&#8217;s mentioned &#8211; <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/vista/2008/06/step_back_in_time_with_turning.html">Turning the Pages 2.0</a> &#8211; is actually pretty awesome. </p>
<p>Essentially, it&#8217;s digitised versions of 19th century (and older) diaries, books and records that you can read and flick through using Silverlight (there&#8217;s also a plain Vista version as well). It&#8217;s been done in conjunction with the British Library, and offers 15 of the library&#8217;s most precious books up for you to read.</p>
<p>I hope that one day, in 150 years time, whatever technology has replaced blogs will come up with some awesome method of rediscovering everything you&#8217;re reading today on Giz AU. </p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.bl.uk/ttp2/hiddentreasures.html">Turning The Pages 2.0</a> via <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/vista">Giz AU's Vista Hub</a>]<br /><span id="more-293303"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/19th_century_blogs_now_available_online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times Reader for Mac Beta: Free for Now</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/ny_times_reader_for_mac_beta_free_for_now-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/ny_times_reader_for_mac_beta_free_for_now-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/ny_times_reader_for_mac_beta_free_for_now-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not so hot on the heels of its Microsoft-built Windows-based counterpart, the Times Reader beta has been made available for all members of NYTimes.com. Although a Silverlight install is required, it&#8217;s relatively painless and a small price to pay for Reader&#8217;s efficient news presentation and olde timey typefaces. There are no subscription fees for now, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/Times_Reader_Mac_Beta.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/>Not so hot on the heels of its Microsoft-built Windows-based counterpart, the Times Reader beta has been made available for all members of NYTimes.com. Although a Silverlight install is required, it&#8217;s relatively painless and a small price to pay for Reader&#8217;s efficient news presentation and olde timey typefaces. There are no subscription fees for now, but Mac users can expect to join the US$14.95 a month party when the software goes final. [<a href="http://firstlook.nytimes.com/?p=49">NY Times</a> via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/05/22/times-reader-beta-now-available/">TUAW</a>] <i>&ndash;by John Herrman</i></p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: microsoft, new york times, ny times, reader, silverlight, software, times reader --><span id="more-290503"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/ny_times_reader_for_mac_beta_free_for_now-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia to Support Microsoft Silverlight Web Video</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/nokia_to_support_microsoft_silverlight_web_video-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/nokia_to_support_microsoft_silverlight_web_video-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haroon Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/nokia_to_support_microsoft_silverlight_web_video-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia has committed to bring Microsoft Silverlight video services to its S60 devices. Further, Nokia will also add support for the video content to its S40-based handsets at later stages. Given the immense market penetration of Nokia&#8217;s Symbian- based mobiles, this partnering will have a large effect on mobile content support, and you can bet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Nokia%20Silverlight%20GI.jpg" class="left" />Nokia has committed to bring Microsoft Silverlight video services to its S60 devices. Further, Nokia will also add support for the video content to its S40-based handsets at later stages. Given the immense market penetration of Nokia&#8217;s Symbian- based mobiles, this partnering will have a large effect on mobile content support, and you can bet your bottom dollar that Adobe is feeling a little sick right now. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL0488272820080304?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews">Reuters</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: cellphones, content, handsets, industry, microsoft, microsoft silverlight, nokia, partnership, silverlight, symbian --><br />
<span id="more-279929"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/nokia_to_support_microsoft_silverlight_web_video-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
