<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Denies Programming Backdoors For NSA In Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-denies-programming-backdoors-for-nsa-in-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-denies-programming-backdoors-for-nsa-in-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey now! Just because the NSA helped Microsoft hone the security of Windows 7 doesn&#8217;t mean Microsoft designed special backdoors for the organisation to spy on us&#8230; right?
In a response to Computerworld&#8217;s article on NSA involvement in Windows 7 development, Microsoft stated: &#8220;Microsoft has not and will not put &#8216;backdoors&#8217; into Windows.&#8221;
Not to nitpick here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/nsa_seal.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Hey now! Just because the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-helped-microsoft-improve-windows-7-security/">NSA helped Microsoft hone</a> the security of Windows 7 doesn&#8217;t mean Microsoft designed special backdoors for the organisation to spy on us&#8230; right?<span id="more-368410"></span></p>
<p>In a response to <em>Computerworld</em>&#8217;s article on NSA involvement in Windows 7 development, Microsoft stated: &#8220;Microsoft has not and will not put &#8216;backdoors&#8217; into Windows.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not to nitpick here, but doesn&#8217;t this denial leave another &#8220;door&#8221; open? As in, couldn&#8217;t the NSA have stuck their own backdoor into Windows 7 while official Microsoft employees turned a blind eye? Or &mdash; and this may come as really shocking &mdash; could Microsoft have simply lied to us in the interest of national security??</p>
<p>Of course, but if you freak out over this potential lack of digital autonomy, you&#8217;re clearly a terrorist. [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141182/Microsoft_denies_it_built_backdoor_in_Windows_7">Computerworld</a> via <a href="http://feeds.digg.com/~r/digg/popular/~3/0X-_YdG9Ox4/Microsoft_denies_it_built_backdoor_in_Windows_7">Digg</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-denies-programming-backdoors-for-nsa-in-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weapons, Robots And Spy Gear From The Paris Military-Police Expo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Apoorva Prasad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Milipol exhibition in Paris is where all the pros play with the military-industrial complex&#8217;s hottest toys. I used special commando skills (and a press badge) to infiltrate the premises and show you the world&#8217;s freshest, most mind-blowing security tech.
OSA PB2 &#8220;Less-Lethal&#8221; Multipurpose Pistol
Ever since I watched Rosa Klebb trying to kill Bond with her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://public-prod.milipol.timfair.com/Paris2009/welcome.php?page=home&#038;divers">Milipol exhibition in Paris</a> is where all the pros play with the military-industrial complex&#8217;s hottest toys. I used special commando skills (and a press badge) to infiltrate the premises and show you the world&#8217;s freshest, most mind-blowing security tech.<span id="more-368370"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lesslethalgun.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lesslethalgun.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><b>OSA PB2 &#8220;Less-Lethal&#8221; Multipurpose Pistol</b><br />
Ever since I watched Rosa Klebb trying to kill Bond with her shoe-dagger, I considered the Russians the world experts in tiny hideaway weapons. The PB2 is an eeency-weeency little double-barrelled &#8220;less-lethal&#8221; pistol weighing less than 200g, firing anything from rubber bullets to flares to flashbangs. It&#8217;s also got a safety and integral laser sights, which can be upgraded to near&ndash;Scott Summers strength on order. Just don&#8217;t practice on some poor country bumpkin like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaGDtXgN0Eo">they did here</a>. [<a href="http://www.tnwt.ru/">OSA</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/drugtest.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drugtest.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><b>DrugWipe by Securetec</b><br />
The DrugWipe is what makes the customs guys all-knowing. It&#8217;s a tiny drug test in a pocket. These plastic sticks can test up to four classes of illegal drugs in a single go. According to Securetec&#8217;s PR guy, your saliva can give you away 12 hours after doing &mdash; or even just being near &mdash; cocaine, weed, opium, meth or whathaveyou. All the government grunts have to do is wipe your tongue. Won&#8217;t open your mouth? They can also swipe your sweat and random stuff you&#8217;re carrying. [<a href="http://www.securetec.net/cms/front_content.php">Securetec</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/spywatch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_spywatch.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Spy Watch</strong><br />
When I approached the director of a small security/protection company to ask about this normal-looking watch, he wouldn&#8217;t tell me a whole lot. What I managed to squeeze out of him is that although it&#8217;s normal size, it also records audio and video. Near the two o&#8217;clock mark you can see a tiny lens, activated by buttons on the side. He wasn&#8217;t the only cagey guy on the show floor &mdash; the guys in a nearby booth forbade me from taking pictures of their micro surveillance gear.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/trikke.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_trikke.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Trikke uPT</strong><br />
The Trikke uPT (ultralight personal transporter) was the funnest (and funniest) thing at the entire expo, and that&#8217;s saying a lot when you&#8217;re surrounded by a pirateload of guns. It&#8217;s an idea so simple its inventor, the dark-suited Dutchman whizzing around on it, couldn&#8217;t figure why his potential buyers would spend any money at all on the wayyyy more expensive Segways parked in the next booth. The uPT is a trike tricked out with a 250W electric motor and a 35km range lithium-ion battery; it weighs just over 16kg. And like that blasted Segway, there are plenty of models to choose from. [<a href="http://www.trikkeme.net/">Trikke</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/riotbot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_riotbot.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>RiotBot by Technorobot</strong><br />
The RiotBot is billed by its makers as &#8220;the first robot for riot control&#8221;. It uses a PS3-looking remote controller to zip this PepperBall-equipped metal beast at 20km/h into all kinds of riots. The carbine fires at 700 rounds per minute and can be operated for two hours. [<a href="http://technorobot.eu/temp/en/">Technorobot</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/maxfitglove.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_maxfitglove.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>MaxFit Gloves</strong><br />
It&#8217;s usually next to impossible to do precise tasks with gloves on. Most of the time, your hands move around in the gloves, you can&#8217;t feel what you&#8217;re holding and you end up feeling as useless as a eunuch in a whorehouse. But the MaxFit workgloves are fanfriggintastic. They were the thinnest, grippiest workgloves I had ever worn. Their try-out test was having me grip an Armor-All lubed PVC tube, then try to twist it out of my hand &mdash; it didn&#8217;t budge. Unfortunately, though the site advertises that it&#8217;s good for construction, DIYers and backyard work, I couldn&#8217;t help but wonder what ulterior activities they were promoting it for at a security show. [<a href="http://www.maxfitcomfort.com/">MaxFit</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/pepperblaster.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pepperblaster.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Piexon Guardian Angel</strong><br />
The Guardian Angel is a tiny plastic toy that looks like your niece&#8217;s water pistol, but it&#8217;s actually a lightweight, disposable two-shot explosive-propelled pepper-spray gun. The cartridges give it way more range than a spray can. Just don&#8217;t carry it around in Scandinavia or other places where it&#8217;s banned, or they&#8217;ll arrest you for it (like they nearly did with me two months ago). Buy the way, it&#8217;s interesting to note that the Piexon website names &#8220;liberal politics&#8221; as a chief reason for needing more protection these days. [<a href="http://www.piexon.com/">Piexon</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/amphibibot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_amphibibot.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Rimmex 288 Prototype Amphibot</strong><br />
The Rimmex 288 is a prototype amphibious robot that can roll straight into water &mdash; streams, rivers and lakes mostly, or just very muddy terrain &mdash; and then roll right back out again. Its single arm with six degrees of freedom can be swapped with whatever you like &mdash; from a gun to an X-ray, apparently, depending on your, uh, objectives. [<a href="http://www.rovdeveloppement.com/">ROV Developpement</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.apoorvaprasad.com/joomla/index.php/articles">Apoorva Prasad</a> is a freelance writer and photographer based in Paris, France, who recently covered the Milipol 2009 military-police expo for us. He has a thing for holo-scoped assault rifles and sounds disappointed when admitting he&#8217;s never been Tased.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NSA Helped Microsoft Improve Windows 7 Security</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-helped-microsoft-improve-windows-7-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-helped-microsoft-improve-windows-7-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While some of us are likely to associate the US National Security Agency (NSA) with daydreams of espionage, the organisation is also highly involved in improving security standards in software. They&#8217;ve even consulted with Microsoft during the development of Windows 7.
According to the NSA&#8217;s Information Assurance Director, Richard Schaeffer, it&#8217;s important for the agency to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/nsa_seal.jpeg" alt="" class="right" />While some of us are likely to associate the US National Security Agency (NSA) with daydreams of espionage, the organisation is also highly involved in improving security standards in software. They&#8217;ve even consulted with Microsoft during the development of Windows 7.<span id="more-368284"></span></p>
<p>According to the NSA&#8217;s Information Assurance Director, Richard Schaeffer, it&#8217;s important for the agency to work with Microsoft and other software makers because otherwise the increasing reliance on &#8220;private-sector computing products&#8221; could put national security at risk. By creating and maintaining high security standards, the agency hopes to reduce the danger of the &#8220;rising threat of cyberattacks&#8221;. Whew. That actually sounds quite reasonable and like a good thing, rather than cause to panic after seeing &#8220;NSA&#8221; and &#8220;Microsoft&#8221; in the same sentence. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html">NPR</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/19/shocking-the-nsa-helped-make-windows-7/">Crunch Gear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-helped-microsoft-improve-windows-7-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fridge Locker Secures Your Snacks From Roommates And Co-Workers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/fridge-locker-secures-your-snacks-from-crappy-roommates-and-co-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/fridge-locker-secures-your-snacks-from-crappy-roommates-and-co-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refrigerators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of your lunch being stolen by your roommates and co-workers? Instead of hiding your snacks, get serious about security with the fridge locker.
Essentially, it&#8217;s a polyurethane cage full of goodies that you store in the fridge and secure with a combination lock (included). Of course, there&#8217;s nothing preventing thieves from stealing the entire cage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/fridge_locker.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_fridge_locker.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Tired of your lunch being stolen by your roommates and co-workers? Instead of hiding your snacks, get serious about security with the fridge locker.<span id="more-365629"></span></p>
<p>Essentially, it&#8217;s a polyurethane cage full of goodies that you store in the fridge and secure with a combination lock (included). Of course, there&#8217;s nothing preventing thieves from stealing the entire cage and working on it later with a hacksaw, but that&#8217;s a lot of trouble to go through for last night&#8217;s leftovers. [<a href="http://www.perpetualkid.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&amp;ProdID=4219">Perpetual Kid</a> via <a href="http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/11/04/fridge-locker/">RGS</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/09/fridge-locker-keeps-your-food-safe/">OhGizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/fridge-locker-secures-your-snacks-from-crappy-roommates-and-co-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jailbroken iPhone? Watch For The Ikee Virus</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/jailbroken-iphone-watch-for-the-ikee-virus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/jailbroken-iphone-watch-for-the-ikee-virus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick astley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rickroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Whirlpool forum has been overwhelmed these past few days with jailbroken iPhone users waking to discover they&#8217;ve been rickrolled – a photo of Rick Astley seemingly permanently attached to their iPhone&#8217;s screen and the words &#8220;ikee is never going to give you up&#8221; emblazoned across the top. It seems jailbreaking may not be as safe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/iphone-rickroll-virus.png"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/iphone-rickroll-virus.png" alt="iphone rickroll virus" title="iphone rickroll virus" width="320" height="480" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-365495" /></a>The <a href="http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1315624">Whirlpool</a> forum has been overwhelmed these past few days with jailbroken iPhone users waking to discover they&#8217;ve been rickrolled – a photo of Rick Astley seemingly permanently attached to their iPhone&#8217;s screen and the words &#8220;ikee is never going to give you up&#8221; emblazoned across the top. It seems jailbreaking may not be as safe as it seems.<span id="more-365494"></span></p>
<p>Fortunately the virus is little more than a prank and not actually malicious. It only affects jailbroken iPhones with an SSH daemon installed. It preys on the fact that many users haven&#8217;t actually changed their SSH password from the default Alpine.</p>
<p>Whirlpool user JD managed to <a href="http://blog.jeltel.com.au/2009/11/truth-about-ikee-iphone-virus.html">track down the guy</a> behind the virus and <a href="http://blog.jeltel.com.au/2009/11/interview-with-ikee-iphone-virus.html">interviewed him</a> on his blog. There are instructions on how to undo the rickroll if you&#8217;ve been victim to this virus, as well as a post dedicated to how to <a href="http://blog.jeltel.com.au/2009/11/ikee-virus-preventing-future-attacks.html">prevent future viruses</a> hitting you through the same security hole.</p>
<p>Despite the somewhat questionable method of doing it, ikee has at least done one good thing in reminding us all of the importance of changing default passwords. If you&#8217;ve got a jailbroken iPhone, you should probably change all your passwords now. In fact, today&#8217;s probably a good day to change all your passwords for everything, just in case &#8211; because next time, it might not just be a picture of Rick Astley on your home screen&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1315624">Whirlpool</a> and <a href="http://blog.jeltel.com.au/">JD's Blog</a> –<em> Thanks Craig!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/jailbroken-iphone-watch-for-the-ikee-virus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another iPhone Developer Gets Busted Stealing Phone Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/another-iphone-developer-gets-busted-stealing-phone-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/another-iphone-developer-gets-busted-stealing-phone-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storm8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhone game developer Storm8, creator of games such as World War, iMobsters and Vampires Live, has just been hit with a suit for secretly gathering the phone numbers of everyone who purchases its games.
It&#8217;s not the first time we&#8217;ve seen this; Swiss developerMogo got busted gathering numbers and then calling people to harass them to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/worldwar.jpg" alt="" class="left" />iPhone game developer Storm8, creator of games such as World War, iMobsters and Vampires Live, has just been hit with a suit for secretly gathering the phone numbers of everyone who purchases its games.<span id="more-365160"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the first time we&#8217;ve seen this; Swiss developer<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/iphone-app-dev-jacks-your-number-to-pitch-you-more-apps/">Mogo</a> got busted gathering numbers and then calling people to harass them to buy more apps, which is certainly a more brazen move. Storm8 claims that this was a bug, but they&#8217;re getting sued anyways. It doesn&#8217;t pay to be shady, devs! [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/05/iphone-game-dev-accu.html">Boing Boing</a> via <a href="http://www.kotaku.com.au/2009/11/iphone-games-caught-stealing-phone-numbers/">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/another-iphone-developer-gets-busted-stealing-phone-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out-Of-The-Box Windows 7 Is Vulnerable To 8 Out Of 10 Viruses</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/out-of-the-box-windows-7-is-vulnerable-to-8-out-of-10-viruses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/out-of-the-box-windows-7-is-vulnerable-to-8-out-of-10-viruses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophoslabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at SophosLabs didn&#8217;t believe claims that Windows 7 and its User Account Controls were any more secure than previous versions of the OS, so they tested a clean install. Result? A reminder that you should always use protection.
The way the test was conducted is that 10 viruses were introduced into a clean install [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/windowsmalware.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_windowsmalware.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The folks at SophosLabs didn&#8217;t believe claims that Windows 7 and its User Account Controls were any more secure than previous versions of the OS, so they tested a clean install. Result? A reminder that you should always use protection.<span id="more-364917"></span></p>
<p>The way the test was conducted is that 10 viruses were introduced into a clean install of Windows 7 with the UAC settings on system defaults. While only one virus was blocked, two technically did not function properly for whatever reason. Still, this doesn&#8217;t leave much hope for those who decide to skip automatic patching, firewalls and antivirus applications. Let&#8217;s do the whole &#8220;Safer Computing&#8221; thing, shall we? [<a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable-8-10-viruses/">Sophos</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/out-of-the-box-windows-7-is-vulnerable-to-8-out-of-10-viruses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NSA To Store A YOTTABYTE Of Your Personal Data</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-to-store-a-yottabyte-of-your-personal-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-to-store-a-yottabyte-of-your-personal-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yottabyte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Utah, the National Security Agency is building a $US2 billion storage facility that will house and analyse all forms of electronic communication&#8230;a potential yottabyte of everyone&#8217;s (formerly) personal data. So how big is a yottabyte? CrunchGear puts it well&#8230;+
There are a thousand gigabytes in a terabyte, a thousand terabytes in a petabyte, a thousand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bytefun.jpg" alt="" class="center" />In Utah, the National Security Agency is building a $US2 billion storage facility that will house and analyse all forms of electronic communication&#8230;a potential yottabyte of everyone&#8217;s (formerly) personal data. So how big is a yottabyte? <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/01/nsa-to-store-yottabytes-of-surveillance-data-in-utah-megarepository/">CrunchGear</a> puts it well&#8230;+<span id="more-364218"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>There are a thousand gigabytes in a terabyte, a thousand terabytes in a petabyte, a thousand petabytes in an exabyte, a thousand exabytes in a zettabyte, and a thousand zettabytes in a yottabyte. In other words, a yottabyte is 1,000,000,000,000,000GB.</p></blockquote>
<p> In terms of data on current human scales, a yottabyte is nearly infinite (though I&#8217;m sure the NSA will manage to fill the thing in like two weeks, and iPods will come with yottabytes in just a few months).</p>
<p>To be fair, the yottabyte figure is just one estimate generated by a Pentagon think tank. The facility could hold <em>a mere</em> hundreds of petabytes. But either way, the prospect is as unsustainable as it is frightening. This one facility will burn through as much electricity as the entirety of Salt Lake City.</p>
<p>All of this data comes from the book <em>The Secret Sentry: The Untold History of the National Security Agency</em> by Matthew M. Aid. And while the paranoid among you may read it, <strong>I, MARK WILSON, HAVE NO REASON TO FEAR THE NSA&#8217;S INVOLVEMENT IN MY LIFE OR INFORMATION AT ALL.</strong> [<a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/23231">NYBooks</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/01/nsa-to-store-yottabytes-of-surveillance-data-in-utah-megarepository/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-nsa-to-store-a-yottabyte-of-your-personal-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Astak Mole Webcam Shares Your Shameful Secrets Online</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/astak-mole-webcam-shares-your-shameful-secrets-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/astak-mole-webcam-shares-your-shameful-secrets-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asktak mole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mole webcam infiltrates your inner sanctum, records the goings on and automatically sends the footage to YouTube. It can also notify you via email or Twitter.

In other words, this would be a great, inexpensive home surveillance cam. It&#8217;s supposed to be a snap to set up. You can access the feed, and control the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/astak_mole.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_astak_mole.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The Mole webcam infiltrates your inner sanctum, records the goings on and automatically sends the footage to YouTube. It can also notify you via email or Twitter.<span id="more-363370"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_astak_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/3e/gallery_astak_2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_astak_3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/2f/gallery_astak_3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_astak_4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/85/gallery_astak_4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>In other words, this would be a great, inexpensive home surveillance cam. It&#8217;s supposed to be a snap to set up. You can access the feed, and control the pan and tilt of the camera from any PC or internet capable mobile phone. For $US300, Astak also throws in motion detection, night vision, two-way audio and a built-in DVR. I have to believe this is as good a feature set as you will find on a webcam at this price point.</p>
<blockquote><p> ASTAK INTRODUCES WORLD&#8217;S FIRST SELF-CONFIGURING, STANDALONE INTERNET CAMERA IDEAL FOR KEEPING AN EYE ON HAPPENINGS AT HOME</p>
<p>YouTube, Twitter and iPhone ready, the affordable and easy-to-use Mole is the first &#8220;do it yourself, view from anywhere&#8221; solution for remote viewing and sharing</p>
<p>SAN JOSE, Calif.–October 28, 2009–The lowly mole is a victim of poor PR, but that&#8217;s about to change with Astak Inc.&#8217;s innovative new product, the Mole &mdash; a standalone Internet camera for consumers who need an easy and affordable way to capture, view and share unattended video over the Internet. Featuring automatic network configuration, the Mole makes it simple for home or business users to remotely view and share video in real-time from any web browser, social networking site, or Internet-capable cell phone, including the iPhone.</p>
<p>Unlike current webcams that require a PC for use, or IP cameras that are complicated to set up and often require customer software to view, the Mole is the first &#8220;do it yourself, view from anywhere&#8221; solution for home or business surveillance, health and family care (elder or children), social network sharing, pet or , bird watching, and other unfolding events such as social gatherings. The Mole is also an ideal way to keep an eye on business or home while travelling.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Mole will redefine home and business surveillance, and it also opens the door to using a remote camera for sharing unattended video, since it&#8217;s Web 2.0 ready,&#8221; said Jason Hsia, CEO of ASTAK. &#8220;Internet citizens are already uploading over 20 hours of video to YouTube every minute. When interesting or important events are underway, you can&#8217;t always be there to see or record them in person. That all changes with the Mole, where motion-detected events can be auto-uploaded to YouTube and a tweet auto-sent to your Twitter feed.&#8221;</p>
<p>A standalone Internet camera with advanced built-in software, the Mole provides auto-configuration so that the user can set up the camera in just a few easy steps and access their video privately without any network knowledge. Once set up, the Mole allows users to adjust the pan remotely to change the view instantly. While easy-to-use and affordable, the Mole camera includes high-end features such as motion detection activation, night vision, two-way audio, and a built-in DVR. The Mole also features both Ethernet or Wi-Fi connectivity.</p>
<p>The Mole is designed for direct access from any web browser, which lets users watch their video instantly, from anywhere, including the iPhone. The onboard software is specifically tailored for seamless Internet sharing including auto-uploads to YouTube. Users can also choose to receive real-time alerts via email or Twitter sent to their mobile phone or any IP-enabled device.</p>
<p>Available in early November 2009, the Mole will be distributed through Astak&#8217;s network of retail and distribution partners, including Fry&#8217;s, Costco, Amazon.com, Walmart.com and Astak.com, with an MSRP of $US299.00.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> [<a href="http://www.astak.com/">Astak</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/astak-mole-webcam-shares-your-shameful-secrets-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>65,000 Time Warner Customers Exposed To Remote Hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/65000-time-warner-customers-exposed-to-remote-hacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/65000-time-warner-customers-exposed-to-remote-hacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner exposed routers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability in their modems and routers has left 65,000 Time Warner customers vulnerable to having their admin menus remotely accessed by evil-doers. Time Warner says they&#8217;re aware of, and working on the issue as we type. [Wired]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/thumb160x_routers.jpg" alt="" class="left" />A vulnerability in their modems and routers has left 65,000 Time Warner customers vulnerable to having their admin menus remotely accessed by evil-doers. Time Warner says they&#8217;re aware of, and working on the issue as we type. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/time-warner-cable/">Wired</a>]<span id="more-361555"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/65000-time-warner-customers-exposed-to-remote-hacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
