<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; sd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/sd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hahahaha! Blockbuster Renting Movies On SD Cards From Kiosks!</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hahahaha-blockbuster-renting-movies-on-sd-cards-from-kiosks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hahahaha-blockbuster-renting-movies-on-sd-cards-from-kiosks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kiosks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I hope whatever exec came up with this idea scores a huge bonus. Blockbuster is piloting a new program in the US that will load DRM&#8217;d movie rentals onto an SD card from a kiosk. The future!
So say you&#8217;re at the airport. You want to rent, I dunno, some movie that wasn&#8217;t good enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/4089981785_1c067328a5-1.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Oh, I hope whatever exec came up with this idea scores a huge bonus. Blockbuster is piloting a new program in the US that will load DRM&#8217;d movie rentals onto an SD card from a kiosk. The future!<span id="more-365883"></span></p>
<p>So say you&#8217;re at the airport. You want to rent, I dunno, some movie that wasn&#8217;t good enough to see in the cinemas. You just format a spare SD card filled with holiday photos you&#8217;d forgotten to back up (it doesn&#8217;t appear they give you a card, but I could be mistaken), pop it in the machine, select a movie, pay $US4 or so and then have the film loaded on your card, a la ticking time bomb, with DRM.</p>
<p>And what can&#8217;t you do with an SD card? I mean, it plays in my iPhone&#8230;wait&#8230;I mean my Blackberry&#8230;wait&#8230;</p>
<p>MiniSD and MicroSD &mdash; those are the cards that most of our mobile devices will take (if they take any at all)! In case no-one told you, Blockbuster, we can&#8217;t play this shit back on our digital cameras.</p>
<p>(Granted, netbook owners and some laptop owners will be able to utilise the standard.)</p>
<p>Ah Blockbuster, you&#8217;ve arrived just in time to ignore the growing popularity of iTunes/Zune Marketplace syncing, 3G streaming and in-flight Wi-Fi all while offering your service on a medium less convenient than DVD. But don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m not angry. You&#8217;re just hurting yourself. [<a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/blockbuster-rent-movies-sd-cards-why">Fast Company</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hahahaha-blockbuster-renting-movies-on-sd-cards-from-kiosks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi-Fi MicroSD Card Makes Eye-Fi Look Obese</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/wi-fi-microsd-card-makes-eye-fi-look-obese/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/wi-fi-microsd-card-makes-eye-fi-look-obese/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsd wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi sd cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japanese phone king KDDI is showing off a MicroSD card with built-in Wi-Fi, sorta like those photo-uploading Eye-Fi cards everyone loves so much. Actually, they&#8217;re just like that, except, well, micro.
There&#8217;s not much of a space for a product like this now, since mobile phones account for most of the devices with MicroSD, and they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_eye-fi.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Japanese phone king KDDI is showing off a MicroSD card with built-in Wi-Fi, sorta like those photo-uploading Eye-Fi cards everyone <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/eye-fi-pro-wireless-sd-card-review/">loves so much</a>. Actually, they&#8217;re <em>just</em> like that, except, well, micro.<span id="more-342580"></span></p>
<p>There&#8217;s not much of a space for a product like this now, since mobile phones account for most of the devices with MicroSD, and they generally have some kind of data connection anyway. But it&#8217;s easy to <em>imagine</em> a (near) future where traditional SD cards are considered bulky, and a wireless MicroSD card would make sense. [<a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090723/173346/">Tech-on</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/wi-fi-microsd-card-makes-eye-fi-look-obese/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photofast CR-7200 CompactFlash Adapter Runs Four MicroSDs In RAID</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/photofast-cr-7200-compactflash-adapter-runs-four-microsds-in-raid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/photofast-cr-7200-compactflash-adapter-runs-four-microsds-in-raid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Tzeng</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compactflash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compactflash adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cr-7200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cr7200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photofast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photofast cr-7200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new CompactFlash adaptor from Photofast can hold four 16GB microSD cards running in RAID. This makes the slower microSD format as fast as CompactFlash by striping data across all four microSD cards at once.
For those that don&#8217;t need 64GB of storage, the CR-7100 will hold one 16GB microSD, while the
CR-7000 holds one 32GB SD. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/a8a8a51d97abb9961ad454e1c3d02306.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The new CompactFlash adaptor from Photofast can hold four 16GB microSD cards running in RAID. This makes the slower microSD format as fast as CompactFlash by striping data across all four microSD cards at once.<span id="more-339554"></span></p>
<p>For those that don&#8217;t need 64GB of storage, the CR-7100 will hold one 16GB microSD, while the<br />
CR-7000 holds one 32GB SD. The 7200 will be available for $US30 and the 7100 and 7000 for $US25, all in July. [<a href="http://www.photofast.co.jp/index_adapter.html">Photofast</a> via <a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news_details.php?id=18372">Akihabara</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/06/custom_1245975501766_PhotoFast_CR-7100_01_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/06/custom_1245975610413_080524cr7000_2_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/photofast-cr-7200-compactflash-adapter-runs-four-microsds-in-raid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SanDisk Claims Title Of World&#8217;s Fastest 32GB SDHC Card</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/sandisk-claims-title-of-worlds-fastest-32gb-sdhc-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/sandisk-claims-title-of-worlds-fastest-32gb-sdhc-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk extreme sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk extreme sdhc card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdhc card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Extreme SDHC card from SanDisk comes in 4/8/16/32GB capacities and boasts speeds of up to 30MB/s, which SanDisk claims as the world&#8217;s fastest.
These cards are designed for HD video and are marketed with the new MacBook Pros in mind, since Apple&#8217;s new laptops finally (finally!) have SD card slots. 30MB/s is easily fast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/32GB_Card_Low-Res.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The new Extreme SDHC card from SanDisk comes in 4/8/16/32GB capacities and boasts speeds of up to 30MB/s, which SanDisk claims as the world&#8217;s fastest.<span id="more-339309"></span></p>
<p>These cards are designed for HD video and are marketed with the new MacBook Pros in mind, since Apple&#8217;s new laptops finally (finally!) have SD card slots. 30MB/s is easily fast enough to comfortably boot an OS from the card slot, which <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/new-macbook-pros-can-boot-from-internal-sd-slot/">we already know</a> is possible. Plus, with all the new DSLRs capable of taking HD video, more space and faster speeds might be of considerable use to photographers and videographers. The cards will be available this August for an undisclosed price. Press release follows. [<a href="http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Item(2687)-SDSDX3-016G-A31-SanDisk_Extreme_III_SDHC_16GB.aspx">SanDisk</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p> SANDISK UNVEILS WORLD&#8217;S FASTEST 32GB SDHC CARD</p>
<p>30MB/s Read &amp; Write Speeds and 32GB Storage Capacity Help<br />
Photography and Video Enthusiasts Do More With Their DSLRs</p>
<p>32GB CardPMA, Sydney, June 25, 2009 – SanDisk Corporation (NASDAQ:SNDK), the global leader in flash memory cards, today introduced the fastest 32-gigabyte (GB)1 SDHC™ card on the market. The 32GB SanDisk Extreme® SDHC™ card at up to 30 megabytes per second (MB/s)2 read and write speeds combines industry-leading performance with massive storage capacity, helping digital photography enthusiasts utilise the advanced features of today&#8217;s DSLR cameras.</p>
<p>&#8220;The market for entry to mid-level DSLR cameras is growing, and SDHC is becoming the de-facto card format for these devices,&#8221; said Susan Park, director, retail product marketing, SanDisk. &#8220;Our card&#8217;s 32GB of storage and up to 30MB/s read &amp; write speeds enable DSLR users to shoot without worrying about storage or speed limitations. SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards provide consumers with a more enjoyable user experience, letting them focus on what is really important – the images that they are capturing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lightning-Fast Write Speed Captures Images Quickly<br />
A memory card&#8217;s write speed plays a crucial role in the overall system of the camera when taking pictures in rapid succession. If a card cannot process data quickly enough then the burst mode shooting may pause unexpectedly as the card catches up to the camera. Burst mode bottlenecks can lead to missing &#8220;the&#8221; shot, especially at sporting or other fast-motion events. The SanDisk Extreme SDHC card offers maximum data-transfer rates, giving consumers a memory card fast enough to unlock the full capabilities of their DSLRs.</p>
<p>The 32GB SanDisk Extreme SDHC card adheres to the SD Association&#8217;s new Class 10 specification, which exceeds requirement for today&#8217;s high definition (AVCHD) video recording. The card offers a sustained write speed fast enough to ensure high-definition video recording and capacity capable of storing 160 minutes of full HD 1920&#215;1080 pixels at 24Mb/s data transfer rate.</p>
<p>Big Files Require Big Storage<br />
Recently-released DSLR camera models like the Nikon D90 and D5000 offer consumers the ability to record HD videos, producing large files that can fill lesser-capacity cards quickly. Today&#8217;s high-megapixel DSLRs also can generate massive still images like those produced in the RAW format used by professional photographers who want to take advantage of the enhanced picture quality and flexibility that RAW allows during post production.</p>
<p>RAW images demand up to ten times as much storage space as regular JPEG images, and when taken in rapid succession during burst mode can quickly fill smaller storage cards. The 32GB SanDisk Extreme SDHC card can store up to 2500 RAW3 images, providing photographers with piece of mind and confidence that they will not run out of space for their images.</p>
<p>Renowned for their world-class durability, SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards guarantee operation at extended temperatures ranging from minus 13 F (minus 25 C) to 185 F (85 C). SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards are fully compatible with any camera, card reader or other device that supports SDHC cards.</p>
<p>When placed in SanDisk&#8217;s new ImageMate® Multi-Card USB 2.0 reader/writer, the SanDisk Extreme SDHC card transfers images and video to a computer at rates of up to 30MB/s. The card&#8217;s fast data transfer rates enable photographers operating under tight deadlines to maximize critical workflow and enter post production as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>Class 10 Performance Sets a New Standard<br />
An SD™ card&#8217;s speed Class is based on its minimum data-transfer rate, and is used to ensure high-quality video recording standards. The SD Association added Class 10 as part of the SD 3.0 specification released earlier this year. The SanDisk Extreme SDHC card&#8217;s performance exceeds the requirements of even the highest-quality AVCHD video recording device, and is currently the fastest Class 10 card in the world.</p>
<p>Availability:<br />
The SanDisk Extreme SDHC 32GB cards will be shipping worldwide to major retailers in August. Also in August, the current 4, 8 and 16GB capacity SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards will be upgraded from Class 6 to Class 104.</p>
<p>About SanDisk:<br />
SanDisk Corporation is the global leader in flash memory cards – from research, manufacturing and product design to consumer branding and retail distribution. SanDisk&#8217;s product portfolio includes flash memory cards for mobile phones, digital cameras and camcorders; digital audio/video players; USB flash drives for consumers and the enterprise; embedded memory for mobile devices; and solid state drives for computers. SanDisk (www.sandisk.com/corporate) is a Silicon Valley-based S&amp;P 500 company with more than half its sales outside of the United States.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/sandisk-claims-title-of-worlds-fastest-32gb-sdhc-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Pro 2009 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/macbook-pro-2009-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/macbook-pro-2009-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know those Microsoft laptop hunter spots? Apple may already have responded with TV spots of their own, but these MacBook Pros strike back at Microsoft better than any ad can: by doing.
Apple did two things simultaneously that are usually contradictory; they lowered the price of their entire MacBook Pro line while at the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros.jpg" alt="" class="left" />You know those Microsoft <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tag/laptop+hunters">laptop hunter spots</a>? Apple may already have responded with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/new_apple_ad_mocks_microsoft_laptop_hunters_in_usual_smarmy_way/">TV spots of their own</a>, but these MacBook Pros strike back at Microsoft better than any ad can: by doing.<span id="more-337462"></span></p>
<p>Apple did two things simultaneously that are usually contradictory; they lowered the price of their entire MacBook Pro line while at the same time bumping up the specs. The 15-inch version now starts at $US1699 and caps out at $US2299, down from $US1999 and $US2499. What&#8217;s even nicer is that the 13-inch MacBook&mdash;which previously didn&#8217;t have a backlit keyboard or a Firewire slot or a &#8220;nicer&#8221; screen&mdash;got absorbed into the MacBook Pro family and is now <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/when-pro-doesnt-mean-pro-anymore/">virtually indistinguishable</a> from the rest of the Pro line.</p>
<p><script> galleryPost('macbook2009gallery', 8, ''); </script></p>
<p>Two other things changed on the build that make the Pros more appealing to regular consumers. The replaceable battery has been swapped for the same type of lithium-polymer internal battery previously found in the 17-inch MacBook Pro, which boosts battery life at the expense of not being able to be changed out in the field. This, for the large majority of people, is a good thing. The batteries last 1000 charge cycles, which at 200/cycles a year, would last you five years. Even if you go through one charge cycle every day, you&#8217;ll still make it about three years before you need to take Apple up on the $US129 replacement. (The $US129 includes shipping, labour and disposal of the old battery.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/battery.jpg" alt="" class="left" />In our test, the 13-inch MacBook Pro got <b>3:31</b> of battery compared to the <b>3:46</b> of the 15-inch MacBook Pro. We used the same metrics as the previous MacBook Pro test&mdash;medium brightness, Wi-Fi on, keyboard backlight on low, H.264 movie&mdash;and got <b>about an hour more on each machine</b>. That&#8217;s a pretty incredible jump just from a change (non-user replaceable battery) that most people won&#8217;t notice.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/sdcard.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The other interesting swap is the removal of the ExpressCard slot in favour of an SD card slot. According to Apple, there was only a &#8220;single digit&#8221; amount of customers that used the ExpressCard, whereas tons of people have digital cameras or other devices that use SD. Again, for the vast majority of mainstream customers, this decision was a smart one. And if you really do need ExpressCard, you can still find it on the 17-inch MacBook Pro&mdash;which doesn&#8217;t have an SD card slot.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/screenside2.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Then we have the improved LED-backlit display, which has a 60% greater colour gamut than previous version. What this means to you is that even the 13-inch MacBook Pro will have a quality display even though it&#8217;s a few hundred dollars cheaper than the 15-inch. The previous 13-inch MacBook, as you saw in our review, had a screen that was obviously inferior to the Pros, and distorted very noticeably as you stepped away or viewed the screen at an angle. Not anymore. From our tests, the 13 and 15 MacBook Pros looked just about identical, and both had superior colour performance compared to older machines we had around.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/geekbench.jpg" alt="" class="left" />An even nicer picture is painted by the benchmarks. This is the first time the 15-inch has gone up over 3GHz (the CTO version), and the entire line has the ability to handle 8GB of RAM. We didn&#8217;t test this 8GB configuration, but we&#8217;re pretty eager to see how much faster it makes us in our daily work.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/xbench.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Both sets of scores are on par with the changes in specs on the new machines. Since the CPUs have been bumped up, the scores have risen to match. It also makes sense that the 2.53GHz 15-inch just about ties the 2.53GHz 13-inch from this year. The only weird drop is in the Integer section of Geekbench, where both machines this year have dropped. A change in Geekbench? A change in 10.5.7? We&#8217;re not sure. But these are some good numbers nonetheless.</p>
<p>Although the removable latch has been exchanged for a screwed in panel, you can still get to the hard drive and RAM by removing ten screws and gently lifting off the back. The entire process should take you less than 10 minutes.</p>
<p>The 13-inch MacBook also has one fewer audio port, instead opting for a single audio port that supports digital in and out. If you need simultaneous in and out and don&#8217;t want to go up to a 15-inch MacBook Pro, you can use a $US29 USB audio adaptor instead.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbooks.jpg" alt="" class="left" />So is there anything bad to say about the new MacBook Pro line? No, not really. It&#8217;s cheaper, faster, has more consumer-friendly features and now even has a 13-inch option for people who need slightly more portability. Those people who were waiting for the second-iteration version of a new hardware design (a pretty smart rule to follow with Apple products in general) before upgrading can safely do so now&mdash;and get a better deal in the process. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">MacBook Pros</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />It&#8217;s cheaper, faster and has a nicer screen</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />SD card slot more useful than ExpressCard for vast majority of customers</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />MacBook Pro line now has a 13-inch option</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Built-in battery means increased battery size, and that means about an hour longer battery life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/macbook-pro-2009-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New MacBook Pros Can Boot From Internal SD Slot</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/new-macbook-pros-can-boot-from-internal-sd-slot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/new-macbook-pros-can-boot-from-internal-sd-slot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootable sd card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootable sd slot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdxc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from photo transfers and straight up storage expansion, the SD card slot in the new MacBook Pros has a single, extremely cool trick up its sleeve slot: it&#8217;s bootable.
According to a fresh Knowledge Base article, a properly formatted SD card can be used to boot OS X from the internal slot. As (vaguely) described, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/wwdc2009-102_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Aside from photo transfers and straight up storage expansion, the SD card slot in the new <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337000">MacBook Pros has</a> a single, extremely cool trick up its sleeve slot: it&#8217;s bootable.<span id="more-337309"></span></p>
<p>According to a fresh <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3553">Knowledge Base</a> article, a properly formatted SD card can be used to boot OS X from the internal slot. As (vaguely) described, this could be a valuable backup and restoration tool, or a convenient way to maintain a semi-portable install of your OS. In proper <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/snow-leopard-on-older-hardware-a-mixed-bag/">giveth/taketh</a> fashion, Apple states in the same posting that, despite being the clear, inevitable replacement for the SDHC standard, SDXC card&#8217;s won&#8217;t be supported, meaning storage will effectively be capped at 32GB.</p>
<p>If Apple really wanted to make this useful, they&#8217;d extend Boot Camp to support external storage devices; a feat which is currently only manageable through complex and unwieldy hacks. On this, the article is tellingly silent. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/06/boot-from-the-sd-card-slot-in-new-macbook-pros.ars?utm_source=microblogging&amp;utm_medium=arstch&amp;utm_term=Main%20Account&amp;utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars</a><em>&mdash;SDXC tip from Richard L</em>.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/new-macbook-pros-can-boot-from-internal-sd-slot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LaCie Data/Share SD Reader Callously Mocks the Sacred Taoist Concepts and Yin and Yang</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lacie_datashare_sd_reader_callously_mocks_the_sacred_taoist_concepts_and_yin_and_yang-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lacie_datashare_sd_reader_callously_mocks_the_sacred_taoist_concepts_and_yin_and_yang-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lacie_datashare_sd_reader_callously_mocks_the_sacred_taoist_concepts_and_yin_and_yang-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
USB flash media readers aren&#8217;t exactly ripe for innovation, so it&#8217;s rare that they surprise us in a way that doesn&#8217;t inspire laughter. But 69ing two readers into one compact, featureless lump? That&#8217;s kinda genius.


Designed by the same folks who brought us those wiseass USB &#8220;Keys&#8221;, the LaCie Data/Share is proudly simple, which is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/lacie_datashare.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>USB flash media readers aren&#8217;t exactly ripe for innovation, so it&#8217;s rare that they surprise us in a way that doesn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/brando_rotarota_hub_addresses_your_usb_thermometric_needs-2.html">inspire laughter</a>. But 69ing two readers into one compact, featureless lump? That&#8217;s kinda genius.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: usb, accessories, data/share, lacie, lacie data/share, lacie datashare, microsd, sd, sdhc, usb card reader, usb sd reader --><br />
<span id="more-335053"></span>
<p>Designed by the same folks who brought us those <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/lacie_microsdreading_usb_keys_are_more_than_just_metaphors-2.html">wiseass USB &#8220;Keys&#8221;</a>, the LaCie Data/Share is proudly simple, which is the source of both its strengths and its weaknesses. Along with plain card-reading capabilities, it offers a great way to store an extra SD or MicroSD card on the go, consolidating case and reader into one unit and eliminating dust and fragility concerns for both. That said, it could stand to <em>do</em> a little more; SD cards are well and good, and I know LaCie is aiming to keep things small, but nowadays it&#8217;s taken for granted that SD readers can handle <em>at least</em> a handful of other flash media as well.</p>
<p>The Data/Share isn&#8217;t yet listed on <a href="http://lacie.com">LaCie&#8217;s website</a>, but it&#8217;s expected to ship at around $US15. [<a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/04/27/lacie-datashare-converts-sd-to-usb-without-fuss/">Electric Pig</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lacie_datashare_sd_reader_callously_mocks_the_sacred_taoist_concepts_and_yin_and_yang-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola Sends Teeny Ear Clips In Huge Cardboard Box</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/motorola_sends_teeny_ear_clips_in_huge_cardboard_box-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/motorola_sends_teeny_ear_clips_in_huge_cardboard_box-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping hall of shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/motorola_sends_teeny_ear_clips_in_huge_cardboard_box-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giz reader Thomas just received two 2-inch Bluetooth earhooks from Motorola&#8212;in a 320-cubic-inch box. As he puts it, &#8220;the package was filled with about 99% air.&#8221; Haven&#8217;t they heard of envelopes? More pics:


 
Thanks Thomas! And thanks to Rob, who also sent in an example ridiculous packaging today: 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ear_hooks_in_box.jpg" alt="" />Giz reader Thomas just received two 2-inch Bluetooth earhooks from Motorola&mdash;in a 320-cubic-inch box. As he puts it, &#8220;the package was filled with about 99% air.&#8221; Haven&#8217;t they heard of envelopes? More pics:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: more ridiculous packaging, motorola, packaging, ridiculous packaging, ridiculous shipping, sandisk, sd, shipping --><br />
<span id="more-331539"></span>
<p><br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/Earhook_packaging_2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><i>Thanks Thomas! And thanks to Rob, who also sent in an example <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/packaging/">ridiculous packaging</a> today:</i><br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/SD_ridiculous_packaging" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/motorola_sends_teeny_ear_clips_in_huge_cardboard_box-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channel 7&#8217;s HD Channel Playing The Australian Open In SD</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/channel_7s_hd_channel_playing_the_australian_open_in_sd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/channel_7s_hd_channel_playing_the_australian_open_in_sd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/channel_7s_hd_channel_playing_the_australian_open_in_sd.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but if I were a TV network executive with a whole HD channel at my disposal, I&#8217;d make sure to fill it with HD content. After all, that &#8216;HD&#8217; in the channel&#8217;s name does mean &#8216;High Definition&#8217;, not standard definition.
What I would not do is broadcast the exact same SD content [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Seven HD Oz Open.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/Seven%20HD%20Oz%20Open.jpg" width="425" height="282" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span>Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but if I were a TV network executive with a whole HD channel at my disposal, I&#8217;d make sure to fill it with HD content. After all, that &#8216;HD&#8217; in the channel&#8217;s name does mean &#8216;High Definition&#8217;, not standard definition.</p>
<p>What I would not do is broadcast the exact same SD content on the HD channel, even if it was the Australian Open. But that&#8217;s exactly what Channel 7 are doing, starting today. Why? Because they hate you.<span id="more-323304"></span>Well, that and the fact that they don&#8217;t actually make any money off their HD channel with advertising, nor does it improve their ratings.</p>
<p>Considering how hard the FTA channels are pushing the upcoming FreeView service and its 15 channels (including the three HD channels), this is just another reason I&#8217;ll be sticking with Foxtel.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/01/low-definition-tennis-for-seven.html">TV Tonight</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/channel_7s_hd_channel_playing_the_australian_open_in_sd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCZ CrossOver Flash Drive Features microSD Expansion</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ocz_crossover_flash_drive_features_microsd_expansion-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ocz_crossover_flash_drive_features_microsd_expansion-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ocz_crossover_flash_drive_features_microsd_expansion-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we looked between the couch cushions, we could probably find 20GB or so in various roaming flash media. Yet it all goes unused whenever we pull out the trusty USB stick.


The CrossOver by OCZ is a simple but clever design for a flash dongle. Coming in 2GB, 4GB, or 8GB sizes, the aluminum-constructed CrossOver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/CrossOver_b.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;" />If we looked between the couch cushions, we could probably find 20GB or so in various roaming flash media. Yet it all goes unused whenever we pull out the trusty USB stick.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: storage, crossover, flash drives, microsd, microsdhc, ocz, ocz crossover, sd, usb --><br />
<span id="more-317892"></span>
<p>The CrossOver by OCZ is a simple but clever design for a flash dongle. Coming in 2GB, 4GB, or 8GB sizes, the aluminum-constructed CrossOver works fine as a standard USB drive, but it&#8217;s also expandable with a built-in microSD/SDHC card reader should you need the extra storage (or just want a convenient way to load your microSD with music and stuff).</p>
<p>No info on the CrossOver&#8217;s price or availability. [<a href="http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/flash_drives/ocz_crossover_usb_2_0_flash_drive">OCZ</a> via <a href="http://www.techfresh.net/ocz-crossover-usb-flash-drive-with-integrated-microsd-adapter/">TechFresh</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ocz_crossover_flash_drive_features_microsd_expansion-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
