<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; satellites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/satellites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Earth&#8217;s Weather Like You Have Never Seen It Before</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/earths-weather-like-you-have-never-seen-it-before/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/earths-weather-like-you-have-never-seen-it-before/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geos-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ newVideoPlayer("/gizmodo-clouds.flv", 500, 375,""); 
This video shows Earth&#8217;s weather from August 17-26, 2009. It also shows how beautiful this planet is and how insignificant we are. It was created at a 7km resolution with NASA&#8217;s GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model.
The GEOS-5 atmospheric model was developed by NASA Goddard&#8217;s scientists. It&#8217;s based on the Earth System [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/gizmodo-clouds.flv", 500, 375,""); </script></p>
<p>This video shows Earth&#8217;s weather from August 17-26, 2009. It also shows how beautiful this planet is and how insignificant we are. It was created at a 7km resolution with NASA&#8217;s GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model.<span id="more-368544"></span></p>
<p>The GEOS-5 atmospheric model was developed by NASA Goddard&#8217;s scientists. It&#8217;s based on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESMF">Earth System Modelling Framework</a>, an open-source project &#8220;for building climate, numerical weather prediction, data assimilation and other Earth science software applications&#8221;.</p>
<p>To really appreciate its beauty, you can watch the 1080p high definition video at NASA. [<a href="http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003600/a003657/comp_geos5_7km.mp4">NASA</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/NASAGoddard">@NASAGoddard</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/earths-weather-like-you-have-never-seen-it-before/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003600/a003657/comp_geos5_7km.mp4" length="23905531" type="video/mp4" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bird&#8217;s Eye View Of Some Fast Birds</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/birds-eye-view-of-some-fast-birds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/birds-eye-view-of-some-fast-birds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GeoEye-1 satellite snapped a picture of the Dubai Airshow and we can see all the pilots&#8217; pretty planes, lined up and waiting to zip-zip-zoom through the sky. Anyone wanna play Guess the Aircraft? [PopSci]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dubai1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dubai1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The GeoEye-1 satellite snapped a picture of the Dubai Airshow and we can see all the pilots&#8217; pretty planes, lined up and waiting to zip-zip-zoom through the sky. Anyone wanna play Guess the Aircraft? [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/dubai-airshow-seen-orbit">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/birds-eye-view-of-some-fast-birds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Not So Different, Earth And Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/were-not-so-different-earth-and-mars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/were-not-so-different-earth-and-mars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are two galleries for you, both taken from space. One is of islands here on Earth, the other of landscapes on Mars. It&#8217;s amazing, the similarities between the two places when you look from a certain distance.
Islands From Space

Martian Landscapes

[Wired Science and Big Picture]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/earthmarstop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_earthmarstop.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Here are two galleries for you, both taken from space. One is of islands here on Earth, the other of landscapes on Mars. It&#8217;s amazing, the similarities between the two places when you look from a certain distance.<span id="more-365256"></span></p>
<p><strong>Islands From Space</strong><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/3b/gallery_islands1.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/ba/gallery_islands2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/d7/gallery_islands3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/1b/gallery_islands4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/73/gallery_islands5.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands6.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/67/gallery_islands6.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands7.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/ec/gallery_islands7.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/islands8.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/9f/gallery_islands8.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><strong>Martian Landscapes</strong><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/fa/gallery_mars1.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/0a/gallery_mars2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/6c/gallery_mars3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/51/gallery_mars4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/fa/gallery_mars5.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars6.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/0f/gallery_mars6.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars7.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/35/gallery_mars7.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_mars8.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/df/gallery_mars8.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/islands-space/">Wired Science</a> and <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/martian_landscapes.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/were-not-so-different-earth-and-mars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA Moon Bombing Mission May Have Worked Out After All</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nasa-moon-bombing-mission-may-have-worked-out-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nasa-moon-bombing-mission-may-have-worked-out-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So that anticlimactic moon bombing NASA attempted the other day may have kicked up a little dust after all.
Indeed, Earth and space-based telescopes couldn&#8217;t see it at the time, but there was, in fact, a dusty plume that got kicked up by the kamikaze LCROSS probe. Success!
That said, there&#8217;s still no word on whether or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/dn17996-1_500.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_dn17996-1_500.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>So that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/first-image-of-actual-moon-bombing-impact/">anticlimactic moon bombing</a> NASA attempted the other day may have kicked up a little dust after all.<span id="more-361021"></span></p>
<p>Indeed, Earth and space-based telescopes couldn&#8217;t see it at the time, but there was, in fact, a dusty plume that got kicked up by the kamikaze LCROSS probe. Success!</p>
<p>That said, there&#8217;s still no word on whether or not water or aliens or cheese were present in the plume. Perhaps it was a combination of all three, and that&#8217;s the reason for NASA&#8217;s silence thus far (more seriously, NASA says results by &#8220;mid-November&#8221;).</p>
<p>Next time, just to be sure, I think NASA should shoot something a bit bigger into the Moon for better results. Something like, say, <a href="http://gawker.com/5383858/exclusive-i-helped-richard-heene-plan-a-balloon-hoax">Richard Heene&#8217;s ego.</a> [<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17996-elusive-lunar-plume-caught-on-camera-after-all.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=tech">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nasa-moon-bombing-mission-may-have-worked-out-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Didn&#8217;t Think Those New Foxtel Channels Would Be Free, Did You?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/you-didnt-think-those-new-foxtel-channels-would-be-free-did-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/you-didnt-think-those-new-foxtel-channels-would-be-free-did-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iq2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Foxtel announced that they were launching 30 new channels on the back of the Optus D3 satellite. What they didn&#8217;t mention was price. Now they have, and if you were crossing your fingers that they were going to just give you those bonus channels for free, you&#8217;re going to be a bit disappointed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Foxtelplay.jpg"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Foxtelplay.jpg" alt="Foxtelplay" title="Foxtelplay" width="369" height="391" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-357332" /></a>Last month, Foxtel announced that they were <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/foxtel-now-its-about-downloads/">launching 30 new channels</a> on the back of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/optus-d3-satellite-is-in-orbit/">Optus D3</a> satellite. What they didn&#8217;t mention was price. Now they have, and if you were crossing your fingers that they were going to just give you those bonus channels for free, you&#8217;re going to be a bit disappointed. Although it&#8217;s not all bad&#8230;<span id="more-359644"></span></p>
<p>At a bare minimum, you&#8217;re looking at an increase of $2, because the starter package has gone up to $42 (from $40). Platinum subscriptions have added $4 from $106 to $110, while Platinum HD have gone from $131 to $135. The HD add-ons ($10 for HD Sport, $10 for HD Explore and $15 for both) have been consolidated into one package called HD, which is $16. </p>
<p>Aside from that though, all that&#8217;s really happened is all the packages have been renamed.</p>
<p>The HD package though, is slightly different for your $16, you get the HD channels that correlate with the other packages you subscribe to. So if you&#8217;re on basic, you&#8217;ll just get Discovery HD, Fox8 HD and National Geographic HD. If you also subscribe to the Sports channels, you&#8217;ll get the HD sports channels as well. Although it would reach a point fairly quickly when you&#8217;d just be better off with the Platinum HD package, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
<p>Finally, Foxtel have added some new iQ and iQ2 packages. Starting at $72 with an iQ (not iQ2) and ranging up to the $135 HD Platinum pack with an iQ2, each package offers a selection of channel packages and a DVR. </p>
<p>You can check out all the new package details <a href="http://www.foxtel.com.au/discover/packages/default.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/you-didnt-think-those-new-foxtel-channels-would-be-free-did-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Launch Your Own Satellite Into Orbit For Only $US8000</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/launch-your-own-satellite-into-orbit-for-only-us8000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/launch-your-own-satellite-into-orbit-for-only-us8000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interorbital systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking to start your own satellite TV station? Perhaps you want to take your stalking of your ex to the next level. Well, if you have $US8000, Interorbital Systems can help make that happen.
The Mojave, California based company is planning to start sending NEPTUNE 30 rockets into low-earth orbit, and they&#8217;ll sell you a spot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/personalsatellite.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_personalsatellite.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Looking to start your own satellite TV station? Perhaps you want to take your stalking of your ex to the next level. Well, if you have $US8000, Interorbital Systems can help make that happen.<span id="more-356658"></span></p>
<p>The Mojave, California based company is planning to start sending NEPTUNE 30 rockets into low-earth orbit, and they&#8217;ll sell you a spot on board for a relatively cheap price. Here&#8217;s CEO Randa Milliron on how this works:</p>
<blockquote><p> The scenario goes like this: the builder pays IOS $US8000 for the kit/launch combo, builds the kit, sends IOS the completed satellite for testing, inspection, and integration into the NEPTUNE 30 rocket. It is then launched. Lift off is not via your very colorful description of candles or hot air, but with four pillars of fire generating 40,000 pounds of thrust. It launches into a circular 310km polar low-earth-orbit (LEO) from the South Pacific Kingdom of Tonga.</p>
<p>When a person buys a kit, ideally he or she has an experiment, task, performance, or other use in mind for the satellite. It&#8217;s really for people with a good set of electronics and programming skills, or for those who want to learn and prove their skills in the field. It can be used as a team building exercise or a solitary triumph. It&#8217;s the ultimate educational tool that allows the user to do real space-based orbital science at what are (comparatively) dollar store prices. Somehow, the bragging rights of being able to say, &#8220;I just sent my first satellite to space and it said hello to me!&#8221; are a far better return on investment than most other purchase options.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Sounds interesting! Whether or not this will all actually, you know, happen, remains to be seen. [<a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/air-space/8k-personal-satellite-and-other-space-adventures">H+ Magazine</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/09/24/put-a-satellite-into.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/launch-your-own-satellite-into-orbit-for-only-us8000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA Smouldering From Space</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/la-smoldering-from-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/la-smoldering-from-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la fires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildfires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=350929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LA fires have actually exploded to double the 245 kilometres they cover in this photo taken Sunday morning by NASA&#8217;s Terra satellite. I imagine this is sort of what LA will look like from space mid-apocalypse. [NASA via BoingBoing]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/lafiresspace.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_lafiresspace.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The LA fires have actually exploded to double the 245 kilometres they cover in this photo taken Sunday morning by NASA&#8217;s Terra satellite. I imagine this is sort of what LA will look like from space mid-apocalypse. [<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/fires/main/usa/cafires_20090901.html">NASA</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/09/01/the-los-angeles-fire-1.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/la-smoldering-from-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optus D3 Satellite Is In Orbit</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/optus-d3-satellite-is-in-orbit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/optus-d3-satellite-is-in-orbit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That Optus D3 satellite launched without a hitch over the weekend. Fingers are crossed everywhere (at Giz HQ, at least) that it won&#8217;t be too long before we get bonus Foxtel channels.
[Img: Optus]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/08/v190_dec_ss_txt.jpg" alt="v190_dec_ss_txt" title="v190_dec_ss_txt" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-348385" />That <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/10-days-until-optus-d3-satellite-launches/">Optus D3</a> satellite launched without a hitch over the weekend. Fingers are crossed everywhere (at Giz HQ, at least) that it won&#8217;t be too long before we get bonus Foxtel channels.<br />
[<em>Img: Optus</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/optus-d3-satellite-is-in-orbit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fastest Data Connection In Space Comes From The Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/fastest-data-connection-in-space-comes-from-the-moon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/fastest-data-connection-in-space-comes-from-the-moon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now, data is arriving across 384,300 kilometres at 100MBps (as in megabytes per second, not megabits), dwarfing every home internet connections out there. That&#8217;s a total of 461GB of data transmitted per day, thanks to this moon-orbiting device.
The 33 centimetre Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier is the first high data rate K-band transmitter on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/tubeampli.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_tubeampli.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Right now, data is arriving across 384,300 kilometres at 100MBps (as in megabytes per second, not megabits), dwarfing every home internet connections out there. That&#8217;s a total of 461GB of data transmitted per day, thanks to this moon-orbiting device.<span id="more-348183"></span></p>
<p>The 33 centimetre Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier is the first high data rate K-band transmitter on a NASA spacecraft. It&#8217;s on board the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which is sending massive amounts of data, from images of its surface&mdash;like <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/images-of-the-apollo-landing-sites-from-the-lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter/">the first photos of the Apollo sites in 40 years</a>&mdash;to 3D data points which are being processed into the most detailed topographical map of our satellite. [<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/LRO_twta.html">NASA</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/fastest-data-connection-in-space-comes-from-the-moon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foxtel Launching 30 New Channels This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/foxtel-launching-new-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/foxtel-launching-new-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catchup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=345721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So when that Optus D3 Satellite goes up this month, Foxtel will get a chunk of the extra bandwidth to launch some new channels. How many channels you ask? 30 new channels, according to the Courier Mail.
Jennifer Dudley-Nicholson managed to track down Foxtel&#8217;s Patrick Delany, and he confessed that the Pay TV company would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/foxtel%20iq2%20review.jpg" title="foxtel iq2" class="aligncenter" width="535" height="357" />So when that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/10-days-until-optus-d3-satellite-launches/">Optus D3 Satellite</a> goes up this month, Foxtel will get a chunk of the extra bandwidth to launch some new channels. How many channels you ask? 30 new channels, according to the <a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25920732-5012980,00.html">Courier Mail</a>.<span id="more-345721"></span></p>
<p>Jennifer Dudley-Nicholson managed to track down Foxtel&#8217;s Patrick Delany, and he confessed that the Pay TV company would be adding 20 SD and 10 HD channels to their service by the end of the year.</p>
<p>The launch of the channels will coincide with an overhaul of their EPG, while the company is also planning on offering over 400 hours of catch-up TV that you can download and watch on a PC as part of your package.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no announcement on what the new channels will actually be yet, but I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll find out soon enough. Things are looking pretty exciting for Foxtel customers over the last half of this year though&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25920732-5012980,00.html">Courier Mail</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/foxtel-launching-new-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
