<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; running</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/running/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>QOTD: Do You Prefer Running With or Without Gadgets?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qotd-do-you-prefer-running-with-or-without-gadgets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qotd-do-you-prefer-running-with-or-without-gadgets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing wth balls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this interview on The Daily Show a few weeks ago, where Jon Stewart interviews Christopher McDougall, author of Born to Run a book about the Tarahumara Indians and their ability to run hundreds of kilometres using nothing but a pair of sandals. It&#8217;s a fascinating interview—you should definitely watch it—but it does lead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this interview on<em> The Daily Show</em> a few weeks ago, where Jon Stewart interviews Christopher McDougall, author of <em>Born to Run</em> a book about the Tarahumara Indians and their ability to run hundreds of kilometres using nothing but a pair of sandals. It&#8217;s a fascinating interview—you should definitely watch it—but it does lead to a very interesting question. Are all the gadgets we use for running—from the expensive shoes to the Nike+iPod system, pedometers and GPS trackers—really necessary? <span id="more-353841"></span></p>
<table style='font:11px arial; color:#333; background-color:#f5f5f5' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='360' height='353'>
<tbody>
<tr style='background-color:#e5e5e5' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;'><a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com'>The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a></td>
<td style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align:right; font-weight:bold;'>Mon &#8211; Thurs 11p / 10c</td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:14px;' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'><a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-august-18-2009/christopher-mcdougall'>Christopher McDougall</a></td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:14px; background-color:#353535' valign='middle'>
<td colspan='2' style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; width:360px; overflow:hidden; text-align:right'><a target='_blank' style='color:#96deff; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/'>www.thedailyshow.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><embed style='display:block' src='http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:246911' width='360' height='301' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='window' allowFullscreen='true' flashvars='autoPlay=false' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='all' bgcolor='#000000'></embed></td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:18px;' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'>
<table style='margin:0px; text-align:center' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='100%' height='100%'>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes'>Daily Show<br/> Full Episodes</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.indecisionforever.com'>Political Humor</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-17-2009/heal-or-no-heal---medicine-brawl'>Healthcare Protests</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Or to put it more succinctly, do you use gadgets when running? Or are you old school Tarahumara style? If you <em>do</em> use gadgets, let us know what you run with in comments.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/playing-with-balls">Playing with balls</a> is Gizmodo AU’s week-long look at the technology behind the sports we love, from the jerseys to the balls and everything in between. Go the Swifts!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qotd-do-you-prefer-running-with-or-without-gadgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Running Shoes Are Probably Bad For You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/running-shoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/running-shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elly Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shoes weren&#8217;t allowed in the house when I was a kid, so I didn&#8217;t bother wearing them much — it was an unacceptable waste of my play time to put them on, only to take them off again if I needed to go inside.
But I always wore joggers for sprinting and cross-country races. They were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/3414064391_b18b99d7b5_b.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Shoes weren&#8217;t allowed in the house when I was a kid, so I didn&#8217;t bother wearing them much — it was an unacceptable waste of my play time to put them on, only to take them off again if I needed to go inside.<span id="more-356085"></span></p>
<p>But I <em>always</em> wore joggers for sprinting and cross-country races. They were just cheap things, but I didn&#8217;t run as well without them. I was frightened of <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bindies">bindies</a>, and without the shock absorption the shoes provided, my feet got sore very quickly. But according to Chris McDougall, author of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Born-Run-Hidden-Superathletes-Greatest/dp/0307266303/ref=nosim/gizmodo-20">Born to Run</a></em> and Dr Daniel Lieberman of Harvard University, this is false logic.</p>
<p>McDougall and Lieberman believe that running shoes can do more harm than good, and say that the human body was designed to run barefooted. Lieberman reckons that the foot and knee injuries we see today were virtually non-existent before Nike came along and invented the modern running shoe in the 1970s. He says that the thick-soled ones, in particular, are making our feet weak and forcing our ankles to rotate too much. And with more injuries, we&#8217;re running less and becoming unhealthier, suggesting that preventable diseases like obesity and diabetes would be less of a problem for the Western world if it weren&#8217;t for the modern running shoe.</p>
<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/article-1170253-047717BD000005DC-925_634x326.jpg"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/article-1170253-047717BD000005DC-925_634x326.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/article-1170253-04771859000005DC-28_634x352.jpg"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/article-1170253-04771859000005DC-28_634x352.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>A study by Switzerland&#8217;s University of Bern found that shoes costing over $95 were <em>more than twice as likely</em> to cause injury compared to shoes costing less than $40. Double the price for double the pain. Mind you, this research was done 20 years ago, but it supports McDougall and Lieberman&#8217;s core argument. Similarly, Dr Craig Richards of the University of Newcastle revealed last year in the <em>British Journal Of Sports Medicine</em> that there is no evidence running shoes make you less prone to injury. He then contacted shoe manufacturers and offered them an opportunity to prove the validity of their products:</p>
<blockquote><p>Is any running-shoe company prepared to claim that wearing their distance running shoes will decrease your risk of suffering musculoskeletal running injuries? Is any shoe manufacturer prepared to claim that wearing their running shoes will improve your distance running performance? If you are prepared to make these claims, where is your peer-reviewed data to back it up?</p></blockquote>
<p>Surprisingly (at least to me), the shoe manufacturers didn&#8217;t jump at the chance to get some publicity. Richards got no response to his challenge. In this case, no news was <em>not</em> good news. In their vow of silence, running-shoe manufacturers were basically admitting their $20 billion industry is based on nothing more than false promises.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a compelling argument, but so long as they continue dangling shoes with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/verb_for_shoe_autoadjusts_comfort_with_builtin_computer-2/">built-in computers</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/pioneer_sneakers_light_your_way_with_builtin_headlights-2/">built-in headlights</a> in our faces, the running-shoe manufacturers have us bedazzled.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1170253/The-painful-truth-trainers-Are-expensive-running-shoes-waste-money.html">Daily Mail</a> via <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/expensive-running-shoes-arent-a-necessity/">Lifehacker</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/josiahmackenzie/3414064391/">top image credit</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/playing-with-balls">Playing With Balls</a> is Gizmodo AU’s week-long look at the technology behind the sports we love, from the jerseys to the balls and everything in between. Go the runners up! </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/running-shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re No Invisible Pedestrian While Wearing This Headgear</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/youre-no-invisible-pedestrian-while-wearing-black-diamond-sprinter-headgear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/youre-no-invisible-pedestrian-while-wearing-black-diamond-sprinter-headgear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black diamond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black diamond sprinter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cave running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headgear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprinter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=351715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Black Diamond Sprinter is designed with the adventurous night runner in mind, but I can just as easily see this headgear transitioning into a lightweight spelunking role&#8230;and, yes, there it is &#8212; I think I just invented cave running.
However, as has been noted, this rechargeable $US80 gadget may have been designed with the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Sprinter_White_1_.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Sprinter_White_1_.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The Black Diamond Sprinter is designed with the adventurous night runner in mind, but I can just as easily see this headgear transitioning into a lightweight spelunking role&#8230;and, yes, there it is &mdash; I think I just invented cave running.<span id="more-351715"></span></p>
<p>However, as has been noted, this rechargeable $US80 gadget may have been designed with the best intentions in mind (i.e. protect you from becoming a bug on someone&#8217;s windshield), but it looks a bit big and unwieldy for running. Perhaps the LED, which casts light a respectable 16 metres ahead, is more suited to the slightly more leisurely pace of the ambitious cave running circuit I&#8217;m currently selling incredibly hard right now?</p>
<p>In any event, it&#8217;s due out in October. The headgear, I mean. [<a href="http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/">Black Diamond</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/09/04/bde-sprinter-new-hea.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/youre-no-invisible-pedestrian-while-wearing-black-diamond-sprinter-headgear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota Humanoid Robot Gives Asimo A Run For Its Money</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/toyota-humanoid-robot-gives-asimo-a-run-for-its-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/toyota-humanoid-robot-gives-asimo-a-run-for-its-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asimo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=343619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Shown here is Toyota&#8217;s running robot. At 7 km/h it&#8217;s not going to win any wind sprints in the Olympics, but nevertheless this thing is airborne for 100ms between strides as it skirts across the floor (i.e. genuine running).
For comparison&#8217;s sake, Honda&#8217;s Asimo robot can only manage a meager 6 km/h. We assume Toyota was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="309"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sv35ItWLBBk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sv35ItWLBBk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309"></object><span id="more-343619"></span></p>
<p>Shown here is Toyota&#8217;s running robot. At 7 km/h it&#8217;s not going to win any wind sprints in the Olympics, but nevertheless this thing is airborne for 100ms between strides as it skirts across the floor (i.e. genuine running).</p>
<p>For comparison&#8217;s sake, Honda&#8217;s <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/asimo">Asimo</a> robot can only manage a meager 6 km/h. We assume Toyota was able to squeeze the extra kilometer per hour out of their robot with a strict training regimen and what can only be described as a mild dose of physical abuse&mdash;their robot can re-balance itself when pushed lightly, as you can see in the video.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t get too pushy, young lady. Word on the street is these robot things are about ready to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/specter-of-deadly-ai-looms-in-wake-of-invite-only-asilomar-conference/">rise up and kill us all.</a> [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sv35ItWLBBk">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://smart-machines.blogspot.com/2009/07/toyotas-running-humanoid-robot.html">Smart Machines</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/toyota-humanoid-robot-gives-asimo-a-run-for-its-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike+ Sportband Reviewed (Verdict: Saves Money On An IPod)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/nike-sportband-reviewed-verdict-saves-money-on-an-ipod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/nike-sportband-reviewed-verdict-saves-money-on-an-ipod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike+ sportband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sportband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sportsband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lisa @ BBG took the long delayed Nike+ sportband (it was announced in April 2008 for an April 2008 release!) for a run. The short of it is that it does what you think it does.
The upside is that it&#8217;s only $US59 and functions as a wristwatch when you&#8217;re not running. It doesn&#8217;t have all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_nike.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/07/13/review-three-miles-w.html">Lisa @ BBG</a> took the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/official_59_nike_sportband_works_without_ipod-2/">long delayed Nike+ sportband</a> (it was announced in April 2008 for an April 2008 release!) for a run. The short of it is that it does what you think it does.<span id="more-341359"></span></p>
<p>The upside is that it&#8217;s only $US59 and functions as a wristwatch when you&#8217;re not running. It doesn&#8217;t have all the features that an iPod and Nike+ combination does, and you obviously can&#8217;t listen to music, but it lets you run without all that extra <em>stuff</em> on you.</p>
<p>BoingBoingGadgets doesn&#8217;t say whether or not you can actually calibrate your runs, but you can use Gmaps to map out your path and use that as calibration. Not an optimal solution if you&#8217;re only going to be running on treadmills.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s $US59, and if all you want to do is run, this is it. Launches Wednesday. [<a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/07/13/review-three-miles-w.html">BBG</a> via <a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/07/13/nike.sportband.and.iphone/">iPodNN</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/nike-sportband-reviewed-verdict-saves-money-on-an-ipod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double-Amputee on Cheetah Blades Fails to Qualify For the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/doubleamputee_on_cheetah_blades_fails_to_qualify_for_the_olympics-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/doubleamputee_on_cheetah_blades_fails_to_qualify_for_the_olympics-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hickey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyborgs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/doubleamputee_on_cheetah_blades_fails_to_qualify_for_the_olympics-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar Pistorius, double-amputee with carbon-fibre &#8220;cheetah&#8221; blades failed to qualify for the Olympics. He just missed the needed time in the 400 meter of 45.55 seconds, though it should be noted he posted a new personal best of 46.25. [New Scientist Tech, via Engadget]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/pistorius.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />Oscar Pistorius, double-amputee with carbon-fibre &#8220;cheetah&#8221; blades failed to qualify for the Olympics. He just missed the needed time in the 400 meter of 45.55 seconds, though it should be noted he posted a new personal best of 46.25. [<a href="http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/dn14359-blade-runner-fails-to-make-the-olympic-cut-.html?feedId=online-news_rss20">New Scientist Tech</a>, via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/18/oscar-pitorius-fails-to-qualify-for-the-olympics/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: oscar pistorius, cool, cyborgs, olympics, running --><br />
<span id="more-298224"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/doubleamputee_on_cheetah_blades_fails_to_qualify_for_the_olympics-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike&#8217;s High Tech Team USA Olympic Track Suits Shave Fractions Off Races</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/nikes_high_tech_team_usa_olympic_track_suits_shave_fractions_off_races-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/nikes_high_tech_team_usa_olympic_track_suits_shave_fractions_off_races-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spandex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/nikes_high_tech_team_usa_olympic_track_suits_shave_fractions_off_races-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a leaked American Gladiators uniform. It&#8217;s Nike&#8217;s design for the US Olympic Track and Field suits. They&#8217;re made from Nike&#8217;s proprietarily named (but possibly a poly-nylon blend synthetic) swift materials. Nike claims the socks and arm coverings, with their dimpled surfaces, break up drag to the tune of 12 to 19% in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/9577_3070852438_01.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;" />This is not a leaked American Gladiators uniform. It&#8217;s Nike&#8217;s design for the US Olympic Track and Field suits. They&#8217;re made from Nike&#8217;s proprietarily named (but possibly a poly-nylon blend synthetic) swift materials. Nike claims the socks and arm coverings, with their dimpled surfaces, break up drag to the tune of 12 to 19% in those areas. The suits, Nike claims, can bring a typically sub-10 second run in the 100-meter dash down by .02 seconds. [<a href="http://www.gizmag.com/nikes-usa-track-and-field-uniforms-unveiled/9577/">Gizmag</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: future spandex, nike, nike olympic suit, olympics, running, spandex, track --><br />
<span id="more-296262"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/nikes_high_tech_team_usa_olympic_track_suits_shave_fractions_off_races-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprinter With Two Carbon-Fiber Feet Gets Olympics Thumbs-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/sprinter_with_two_carbonfiber_feet_gets_olympics_thumbsup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/sprinter_with_two_carbonfiber_feet_gets_olympics_thumbsup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial limbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/sprinter_with_two_carbonfiber_feet_gets_olympics_thumbsup-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar Pistorius is a sprinter with a difference: he runs on two artificial lower legs and feet fast enough that he may qualify for the Olympics. And that&#8217;s something he can now attempt, given that the Court of Arbitration for Sport has just overturned a ruling by the International Association of Athletics that had banned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/Ossur_Oscar_Take_Off.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/>Oscar Pistorius is a sprinter with a difference: he runs on two artificial lower legs and feet fast enough that he may qualify for the Olympics. And that&#8217;s something he can now attempt, given that the Court of Arbitration for Sport has just overturned a ruling by the International Association of Athletics that had banned him from competing against able-bodied runners. All because of the specialised carbon-fibre Cheetah Flex-Foot prosthetic feet he uses, which represented an unfair mechanical advantage maintained the IAAF. So the advanced artificial limbs, designed after the shape of a Cheetah&#8217;s hind leg, were put to the test in the lab.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: artificial limb, cheetah flex-foot, double amputee, gadgets, olympics, oscar pistorius, race, running --><br />
<span id="more-289821"></span> </div>
<p> </body> <body>
<div>
<p><img alt="Cheetah_HR.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/Cheetah_HR.jpg" width="170" height="320" class="left">A study led by MIT professor Hugh M. Herr revealed that the high-tech feet didn&#8217;t give Oscar an advantage over able-bodied runners, conflicting with a January study at the German Sport University which stated they were 30% more efficient than a human ankle. The German study also suggested that the springy feet meant that a user would need 25% less energy expenditure than an able-bodied runner to achieve the same sprinting speed: this is the study the IAAF based the ban on.</p>
<p>A panel at the Court of Arbitration looked at both studies and eventually ruled in favour of Oscar, overturning the IAAF&#8217;s ban and opening the gates for him to try to qualify for the 400m.</p>
<p>Oscar was born without fibulas, and had the lower part of both legs amputated when he was 11. He runs on the J-shaped Cheetah feet now, and does so remarkably well: his PB is 46.56 seconds, which is just shy of the 45.55 second qualifying time for Beijing. He plans to train hard, but may be invited to join the South African relay team even if he doesn&#8217;t beat the individual race qualifying time. And that sounds much more in the spirit of good sportsmanship than banning the guy in the first place. [<a href="http://www.flexfoot.com/pages/6738">Flexfoot</a> and <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/news?slug=ap-run-cas-pistorius&#038;prov=ap&#038;type=lgns">Yahoo</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/score/article/2008-05/double-amputee-sprinter-cleared-olympic-competition">Popsci</a>] (Images courtesy of www.ossur.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/sprinter_with_two_carbonfiber_feet_gets_olympics_thumbsup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike+iPod Patent Shows Heart Rate, Temperature and Hydration Monitors</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/nikeipod_patent_shows_heart_rate_temperature_and_hydration_monitors-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/nikeipod_patent_shows_heart_rate_temperature_and_hydration_monitors-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nike+ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/nikeipod_patent_shows_heart_rate_temperature_and_hydration_monitors-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main complaints about the current Nike+ Gear aren&#8217;t that it doesn&#8217;t do a good job keeping track of how far you run, it&#8217;s that it doesn&#8217;t measure stuff like heart rate, body temperature and other factors runners care about. Nike hears you. Their latest patent for upcoming Nike+ gear expands on the current concept [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/nikepatent.gif" class="left"/>The main complaints about the current Nike+ Gear aren&#8217;t that it doesn&#8217;t do a good job keeping track of how far you run, it&#8217;s that it doesn&#8217;t measure stuff like heart rate, body temperature and other factors runners care about. Nike hears you. Their latest patent for upcoming Nike+ gear expands on the current concept and features all kinds of sensors over a person&#8217;s body, even possibly adding a GPS receiver so you can automatically map out the path you took on your run. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: apple, exercise, gps, heart rate, hydration, nike, nike sensor, nike+, nike+ipod, running, sensors, temperature --><br />
<span id="more-287046"></span>
<p>What&#8217;s even better for people who live in cold places or don&#8217;t like to run out side (me) is that there are sensors for talking to exercise machines to fetch data. The only downside? Nike&#8217;s slow arse development cycle means you&#8217;re not going to see this for another year or two. Seriously. Some of these <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/nike-ipod-watch-details-leaked-230120.php">leaked Nike products</a> back from January 2007 still haven&#8217;t been released. [<a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/08/04/25/nikeipod.gear.patent/">iPodNN</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/nikeipod_patent_shows_heart_rate_temperature_and_hydration_monitors-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Running-Powered Bike is Pure Ludicrousness</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/the_runningpowered_bike_is_pure_ludicrousness-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/the_runningpowered_bike_is_pure_ludicrousness-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/the_runningpowered_bike_is_pure_ludicrousness-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh&#8230; oh my. This is a running-powered bicycle (although technically, it&#8217;s a tricycle, which gives it even less dignity). There are no pedals; instead, you run with the seat jammed up in your crotch and hop on the foot holds when you get enough speed going to coast. It is amazingly ridiculous, and it only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/runningbike.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none"/>Oh&#8230; oh my. This is a running-powered bicycle (although technically, it&#8217;s a tricycle, which gives it even less dignity). There are no pedals; instead, you run with the seat jammed up in your crotch and hop on the foot holds when you get enough speed going to coast. It is amazingly ridiculous, and it only gets funnier when you see the video of some dude running on it with, as I said, the seat jammed up in his crotch.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: bikes, gadgets, jump, lolz, running bike --><br />
<span id="more-284111"></span>
<p><object width="494" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/O-1xm8415UQ&#038;hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/O-1xm8415UQ&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="494" height="400"></object><br /> [<a href="http://www.designboom.com/weblog/read.php?CATEGORY_PK=&#038;TOPIC_PK=2686">DesignBoom</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/the_runningpowered_bike_is_pure_ludicrousness-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
