<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; rumour smashed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/rumour-smashed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>That Awesome Lenovo Pocket Yoga Netbook From Earlier This Morning? Not a Product</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/that_awesome_lenovo_pocket_yoga_netbook_from_earlier_this_morning_not_a_product-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/that_awesome_lenovo_pocket_yoga_netbook_from_earlier_this_morning_not_a_product-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/that_awesome_lenovo_pocket_yoga_netbook_from_earlier_this_morning_not_a_product-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly, the folks at Lenovo&#8217;s design department have outed the Pocket Yoga as a two-year-old concept. Why photos of it showed up on a Lenovo Flickr stream earlier today is anyone&#8217;s guess, but as of now, they&#8217;re denying that this is an actual upcoming product. Boo. [Lenovo Design Matters]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/03/custom_1237232694485_lenovo_pocketyoga_01.jpg" alt="" />Sadly, the folks at Lenovo&#8217;s design department have outed the Pocket Yoga as a two-year-old concept. Why photos of it <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/shots_leak_of_lenovo_pocket_yoga_delnetbookdel_concept_looks_like_it_actually_fits_in_a_pocket-2.html">showed up on a Lenovo Flickr stream earlier today</a> is anyone&#8217;s guess, but as of now, they&#8217;re denying that this is an actual upcoming product. Boo. [<a href="http://lenovoblogs.com/designmatters/?p=1030">Lenovo Design Matters</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor smashed, concepts, laptops, lenovo, lenovo pocket yoga, netbooks, pocket yoga, sony vaio p, vaio p --><br />
<span id="more-330898"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/that_awesome_lenovo_pocket_yoga_netbook_from_earlier_this_morning_not_a_product-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Denies Mini 9 Undersized Battery Claims, Testing Concurs with Dell</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/dell_denies_mini_9_undersized_battery_claims_testing_concurs_with_dell-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/dell_denies_mini_9_undersized_battery_claims_testing_concurs_with_dell-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/dell_denies_mini_9_undersized_battery_claims_testing_concurs_with_dell-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports hit yesterday that Dell had shipped Mini 9 reviewers a 32Wh battery while shorting consumers with an undersized 24Wh battery. Dell has since denied the claims, and further testing sides with Dell, too.


According to a spokesperson, 
Mini 9 is configured with and has never shipped with anything but 32WH batteries. A third party test [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/dell-e-is-the-inspiron-910.jpg" />Reports hit <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/dell_shipping_inspiron_mini_9_with_super_mini_batteries-2.html">yesterday</a> that Dell had shipped Mini 9 reviewers a 32Wh battery while shorting consumers with an undersized 24Wh battery. Dell has since denied the claims, and further testing sides with Dell, too.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor smash, 24wh, 32wh, batteries, dell mini 9, dell mini 9 battery, mini 9 --><br />
<span id="more-319838"></span>
<p>According to a spokesperson,<br /> <br />
<blockquote>Mini 9 is configured with and has never shipped with anything but 32WH batteries. A third party test program being used in the field doesn&#8217;t properly program every vendor&#8217;s battery to report power (versus current) capabilities, and so the utility is not properly reporting the actual battery capacity. We have confirmed this and all packs are 4-cell 32Whr, and will deliver more than 4 hours of battery life in typical usage.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Indeed, the original forum poster even admitted that the &#8220;24Wh&#8221; battery actually <a href="http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/battery-capacity-24-wh,-not-32-wh-t1723s110.html#p13788">had a longer life span </a>than their &#8220;32Wh&#8221; version. And both batteries exceeded four hours of usage. </p>
<p>So between Dell&#8217;s outright denial and further testing by forum members, it looks like this rumour was smashed. Whether or not we have a real explanation as to the odd discrepancies in testing software, as long as it&#8217;s not screwing with battery life, I really couldn&#8217;t care less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/dell_denies_mini_9_undersized_battery_claims_testing_concurs_with_dell-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile Probably Did Not Sell 1.5 Million G1 Pre-Orders</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tmobile_probably_did_not_sell_15_million_g1_preorders-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tmobile_probably_did_not_sell_15_million_g1_preorders-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whoops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tmobile_probably_did_not_sell_15_million_g1_preorders-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Did the announcement that T-Mobile sold 1.5 million G1 pre-orders sound a little too fantastic to be true? Information Week thought so and talked to the guy behind the astronomical number&#8211;a mathematician at The Motley Fool. Turns out that some iffy multiplication may have been involved and the number of pre-orders sold is probably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/t-mobile-g1_01.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" /> Did the announcement that T-Mobile sold 1.5 million G1 pre-orders sound a little too fantastic to be true? <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/10/dont_buy_the_g1.html">Information Week</a> thought so and talked to the guy behind the astronomical number&#8211;a mathematician at <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2008/10/09/google-were-fresh-out-of-androids.aspx">The Motley Fool</a>. Turns out that some iffy multiplication may have been involved and the number of pre-orders sold is probably closer to 200,000 to 300,000. Big, but not <i>crazy big</i>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor control, android, cellphones, g1, google, google android, google g1, htc, htc dream, iphone killer, smartphones, t-mobile --><span id="more-310727"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p>I contacted Anders Bylund, the author of the original Motley Fool article that hundreds of stories are citing. I was curious as to how he got these figures and he gave me his rationale.<br /> He cited a Cens.com article that said, &#8220;according to industry insiders, T-Mobile is planning to order a total of between 1.5 million and 2 million units of G1 with HTC in the near future, including 400,000 to 500,000 to be sold in the fourth quarter of this year.&#8221;<br /> Then, Bylund cited T-Mobile selling out of pre-order units, and tripling the number of phones initially available. He then tripled the 500,000 number to get 1.5 million.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Considering the iPhone, which launched in 20 different countries, only hit a million during its first weekend, we all probably should have been a little more suspicious of one phone in one country on one carrier surpassing that. The G1 looks to be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tmobile_g1_google_android_phone_review-2.html">a spectacular competitor</a>, but we ought not to lose our heads rooting for its success. [<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/10/dont_buy_the_g1.html">Infoweek</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tmobile_probably_did_not_sell_15_million_g1_preorders-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Ads Featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld Not Cancelled</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/microsoft_ads_featuring_bill_gates_and_jerry_seinfeld_not_canceled-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/microsoft_ads_featuring_bill_gates_and_jerry_seinfeld_not_canceled-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerry seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrasound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/microsoft_ads_featuring_bill_gates_and_jerry_seinfeld_not_canceled-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Gates_and_Seinfeld_Ads_NOT_Canceled';  
From a trusted Crispin Porter source, we&#8217;ve learned that the internet has jumped the gun and that the Microsoft Gates/Seinfeld ads have not been axed. It&#8217;s true, Microsoft apparently asked the agency to focus on the new &#8220;I&#8217;m a PC&#8221; spots. And it&#8217;s true, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/seinfeld-and-gates.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" /></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript"> digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Gates_and_Seinfeld_Ads_NOT_Canceled'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></div>
<p>From a trusted Crispin Porter source, we&#8217;ve learned that the internet has jumped the gun and that the Microsoft Gates/Seinfeld ads have not been axed. It&#8217;s true, Microsoft apparently asked the agency to focus on the new &#8220;<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/first_screenshot_of_the_new_microsoft_ads_im_a_pc_and_i_shark_dive-2.html">I&#8217;m a PC</a>&#8221; spots. And it&#8217;s true, the agency has gotten plenty of &#8220;<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/the_first_bill_gates__jerry_seinfeld_microsoft_ad_makes_no_sense.html">I don&#8217;t know what this means</a>&#8221; response in their measured statistics of the Gates/Seinfeld ads. But no one has <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/seinfeld_and_gates_are_out_im_a_mac_counterattack_ads_are_in.html">pulled the plug</a> on the dynamic duo just yet.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor smashed, bill gates, gates and seinfeld, jerry seinfeld, microsoft, top --><br />
<span id="more-306757"></span>
<p>In fact, Crispin Porter has another completed spot featuring the lovable, affluent couple in the can, ready to air (even though it won&#8217;t quite yet). And while the agency has prioritised development to the anti-Mac ads, there are still full plans to go ahead and produce more Seinfeld/Gates spots unless Microsoft were to pull the plug first (which, once again, they have not at this time).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to know that in a time of economic uncertainty, Gates and Seinfeld haven&#8217;t been laid off just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/microsoft_ads_featuring_bill_gates_and_jerry_seinfeld_not_canceled-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour Smash: Dell Inspiron Mini 9 Doesn&#8217;t Have Hidden 3G Powers (Yet)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/rumour_smash_dell_inspiron_mini_9_doesnt_have_hidden_3g_powers_yet-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/rumour_smash_dell_inspiron_mini_9_doesnt_have_hidden_3g_powers_yet-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsdpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultraportables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/rumour_smash_dell_inspiron_mini_9_doesnt_have_hidden_3g_powers_yet-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though Vodafone is gleefully selling Dell&#8217;s Inspiron Mini 9 with built-in 3G, it turns out that Mini 9s sold in the US actually don&#8217;t possess latent 3G powers like that annoying kid on Heroes. A solid source close to the matter told us that while every Mini 9 uses the same motherboard with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/inspironminisad.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Even though Vodafone is gleefully selling <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/dell_inspiron_mini_9_available_now_windows_xp_399_ubuntu_349-2.html">Dell&#8217;s Inspiron Mini 9</a> with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/dell_inspiron_mini_9_has_hidden_builtin_3g-2.html">built-in 3G</a>, it turns out that Mini 9s sold in the US actually don&#8217;t possess latent 3G powers like that annoying kid on <em>Heroes</em>. A solid source close to the matter told us that while every Mini 9 uses the same motherboard with a port for integrated mobile broadband (&#8217;cause it&#8217;s cheaper than using two versions), the mini 9s sold so far in the US don&#8217;t have the antenna or radio for 3G. However, they will by the end of the year, with Dell&#8217;s usual range of <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/dell_studio_15_laptops_packing_evdo_like_their_little_brother-2.html">mobile broadband options</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: inspiron mini 9, 3g, dell, inspiron mini, inspiron mini 9 3g, laptops, mini, notebooks, rumor smash, rumor smashed --><br />
<span id="more-305257"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/rumour_smash_dell_inspiron_mini_9_doesnt_have_hidden_3g_powers_yet-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour Smashed: No New Kindle This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/rumour_smashed_no_new_kindle_this_year-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/rumour_smashed_no_new_kindle_this_year-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/rumour_smashed_no_new_kindle_this_year-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the rumours, it looks like there will be no sunny retirement for the current Kindle. From Amazon&#8217;s chief spokesperson to the New York Times:


One thing I can tell you for sure is that there will be no new version of the Kindle this year. A new version is possible sometime next year at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/kindleworker.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />Despite <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/kindle_rumours_say_next_version_coming_fall_will_be_thinner_cheaper_much_more_stylish-2.html">the rumours</a>, it looks like there will be no sunny retirement for the current <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/review_addendum_using_amazon_kindle_on_vacation-2.html">Kindle</a>. From Amazon&#8217;s chief spokesperson to the New York Times:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor smashed, amazon, e-ink, e-paper, e-reader, epaper, ereader, kindle, new kindle --><br />
<span id="more-303974"></span><br />
<blockquote>One thing I can tell you for sure is that there will be no new version of the Kindle this year. A new version is possible sometime next year at the earliest.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh well, maybe next Christmas. Sorry Timmy, don&#8217;t cry. Santa still loves you&mdash;it&#8217;s Jeff Bezos who doesn&#8217;t. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/extinguish-the-rumors-no-new-kindle-this-year/index.html?partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/rumour_smashed_no_new_kindle_this_year-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 Shots Revealed as Fake</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/nikon_d700_shots_revealed_as_fake-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/nikon_d700_shots_revealed_as_fake-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyshots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/nikon_d700_shots_revealed_as_fake-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darnit darnit&#8211;that&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll be saying if you&#8217;re an eager Nikon fan, waiting for the new mid-range D700 DSLR. Those shots we showed you in our previous rumour post? Yep: faked. Over on NikonD700.com they&#8217;ve got a link to the original pre-Photoshopped image on Flickr. It&#8217;s of a D300, and is clearly of a higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/d700smash.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;display:block;float:none;"/>Darnit darnit&#8211;that&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll be saying if you&#8217;re an eager Nikon fan, waiting for the new mid-range <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/nikon_d700_midrange_fullframe_dslr_leaked_has_d3s_image_sensor_and_autofocus-2.html">D700 DSLR</a>. Those shots we showed you in our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/possible_nikon_d700_dslr_shots_leaked-2.html">previous rumour post</a>? Yep: faked. Over on <a href="http://www.nikond700.com">NikonD700.com</a> they&#8217;ve got a link to the original pre-Photoshopped image on Flickr. It&#8217;s of a D300, and is clearly of a higher quality and resolution than the D700 fake. See below for the full pic.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor smashed, cameras, d300, d700, digital cameras, dslr, faked, fakes, gadgets, nikon, nikon d700, photography, photoshopping, rumor, spy shot --><br />
<span id="more-295306"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/d300orig.jpg" height="373" width="494" class="center"></p>
<p> [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dominic_kamp/2613106469/">Flickr</a> via <a href="http://www.nikond700.com/2008/06/nikon-d700-spy-shot-confirmed-fake/">NikonD700.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/nikon_d700_shots_revealed_as_fake-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour Smashed: Activating iPhone 3G Will NOT Brick Your Old iPhone (And Your Mum Can Activate It From Home)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_rumour_smashed_activating_iphone_3g_will_not_brick_your_old_iphone_and_your_mum_can_activate_it_from_home_-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_rumour_smashed_activating_iphone_3g_will_not_brick_your_old_iphone_and_your_mum_can_activate_it_from_home_-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_rumour_smashed_activating_iphone_3g_will_not_brick_your_old_iphone_and_your_mum_can_activate_it_from_home_-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a scary rumour more than a few readers have asked us about, that activating an iPhone 3G would brick your old iPhone. So here&#8217;s the deal, straight from AT&#038;T. If you activate a new iPhone 3G, your wireless number is obviously ported to it. But can totally give it to your cousin in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/iphoneold.jpg" style="display:block;"/>There&#8217;s a scary rumour more than a few readers have asked us about, that activating an iPhone 3G would <a href="http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9717097-1.html?tag=cnetfd.mt">brick your old iPhone</a>. So here&#8217;s the deal, straight from AT&#038;T. If you activate a new iPhone 3G, your wireless number is obviously ported to it. But can totally give it to your cousin in the boonies where&#8217;s the no 3G to use as a phone&#8211;they just hook it up to their computer, sync it and setup a plan through iTunes just like you did when you brought it home for the very first time. No trips to the AT&#038;T store required. Sweet, eh? If you&#8217;re greedy and want to hang on to it, then it&#8217;ll basically become an iPod touch&#8211;it&#8217;ll do everything it used to, sans go on AT&#038;T&#8217;s network. [<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/giz-explains/iphone-3g">Giz Explains iPhone 3G</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  rumor smashed ,  3g ,  apple ,  at&#038;t ,  cellphones ,  iphone ,  iphone 3g  --><br />
<span id="more-293236"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_rumour_smashed_activating_iphone_3g_will_not_brick_your_old_iphone_and_your_mum_can_activate_it_from_home_-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Optus iPhone Pricing Details &#8216;Wrong&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/exclusive_optus_iphone_pricing_details/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/exclusive_optus_iphone_pricing_details/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/exclusive_optus_iphone_pricing_details.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Update: About half an hour ago I received an angry phonecall from Optus about this story. I was told, in no uncertain terms, that the pricing tip I received was &#8220;wrong&#8221;. No more information was given, other than the fact that the story was incorrect.
looks like we still have a little wait before we know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="iphone optus.png" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/images/2008/05/iphone%20optus.png" class="center" height="874" width="500" />
<div>
<blockquote><b>Update:</b> About half an hour ago I received an angry phonecall from Optus about this story. I was told, in no uncertain terms, that the pricing tip I received was &#8220;wrong&#8221;. No more information was given, other than the fact that the story was incorrect.
<p>looks like we still have a little wait before we know what we&#8217;ll be paying for the iPhone&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The biggest question on everyone&#8217;s lips now that the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/3g_iphone_to_launch_in_australia_july_11.html">iPhone has been announced in Australia</a> is how much it&#8217;s going to cost you. Well, a friendly tipster has stealthily procured those details and sent them through to Giz AU. Thanks Tipster!</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re an Optus customer, here&#8217;s what <strike>you can expect</strike> we were told: </div>
<div></div>
<p><span id="more-292953"></span><img alt="scancrop2.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/images/2008/06/scancrop2.jpg" class="center" height="295" width="455" />
<div>
<ul>
<li>*The iPhone is only available on a 24 month contract &#8211; you can&#8217;t purchase it outright</li>
<li>*The 8GB model will cost $220, the 16GB $330</li>
<li>*Only the 16GB is available in white </li>
<li>*Optus won&#8217;t be selling accessories &#8211; they will be sold through the Apple store</li>
<li>*There will be two plans available: a $79 cap with 1GB data and $300 worth of calls; and a $99 cap with 3GB of data and $400 worth of calls</li>
<li>*Both plans include Visual Voicemail</li>
<li>*30c flagfall; 35c per 30 seconds talk, 25c SMS messages</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, as with any tip, this isn&#8217;t 100 percent confirmed yet &#8211; I&#8217;ll be chasing up with Optus in the morning to get confirmation. But the source seems legit from my end, and the pricing all sounds about what I was expecting.</p>
<p>What do you guys think? Is $79 for 1GB worth of data good enough value for money for a portable internet device?</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/iphone">iPhone 3G on Giz</a>]</div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/exclusive_optus_iphone_pricing_details/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>154</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 3G Rumour Accuracy Check: We Were Right(ish)!</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/iphone_3g_rumour_accuracy_check_we_were_rightish-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/iphone_3g_rumour_accuracy_check_we_were_rightish-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour smashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/iphone_3g_rumour_accuracy_check_we_were_rightish-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, we rounded up and judged the most colorful iPhone 3G rumours floating around the tubes. Now that Steve has spilled the beans, I bet you&#8217;re curious as to how accurate our thinking was. Turns out we were pretty much on target with our verdicts.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/rumorboom3.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/>Last Friday, we <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/iphone_2_rumour_roundup_verdict_dont_believe_everything_you_read-2.html">rounded up and judged</a> the most colorful iPhone 3G rumours floating around the tubes. Now that Steve has spilled the beans, I bet you&#8217;re curious as to how accurate our thinking was. Turns out we were pretty much on target with our verdicts.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: , apple, cellphones, gadgets, iphone, keynote, rumor round-up, rumors, smartphone, wwdc, wwdc 2008, wwdc08 --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/iphone_3g_rumour_accuracy_check_we_were_rightish-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
