<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; remote controls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/remote-controls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NEC&#8217;s New TV Remote Uses No Batteries</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/necs-new-tv-remote-uses-no-batteries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/necs-new-tv-remote-uses-no-batteries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be some time before it reaches couch potatoes&#8217; hands, but NEC&#8217;s new TV remote prototype promises eternal power and no battery changes. Ever. How so? It doesn&#8217;t use any. How is this sorcery possible?
According to the witches and wizards at NEC Electronics and Onryoku Hatsuden, their new remote generates electricity when the users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/nec_remote_control.jpg" alt="" class="right" />It will be some time before it reaches couch potatoes&#8217; hands, but NEC&#8217;s new TV remote prototype promises eternal power and no battery changes. Ever. How so? It doesn&#8217;t use any. How is this sorcery possible?<span id="more-367785"></span></p>
<p>According to the witches and wizards at NEC Electronics and Onryoku Hatsuden, their new remote generates electricity when the users clicks on any button. They are planning to see the first production remotes in 2011. [<a href="http://asiajin.com/blog/2009/11/18/self-generating-battery-less-remote-control-for-tv/">Aiajin</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/18/nec-prototypes-battery-less-remote-control/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/necs-new-tv-remote-uses-no-batteries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Did We Ever Cope Before The Remote Control?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-did-we-ever-cope-before-the-remote-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-did-we-ever-cope-before-the-remote-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History of TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flashmatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy bones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zenith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it&#8217;s quite fun to look back at the history of television this month, it also helps to point out just how good we&#8217;ve got it today. Could you imagine flicking through all of Foxtel&#8217;s hundred-odd channels manually by getting up to the TV? That&#8217;s what it was like (except without the &#8220;hundred-odd&#8221;) before the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/Zenith_Space_Commander_600.jpg"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/Zenith_Space_Commander_600.jpg" alt="Zenith_Space_Commander_600" title="Zenith_Space_Commander_600" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-365508" /></a>While it&#8217;s quite fun to look back at the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/history-of-tv">history of television</a> this month, it also helps to point out just how good we&#8217;ve got it today. Could you imagine flicking through all of Foxtel&#8217;s hundred-odd channels manually by getting up to the TV? That&#8217;s what it was like (except without the &#8220;hundred-odd&#8221;) before the remote control was invented in 1950.<span id="more-365507"></span></p>
<p>The first remote, developed by Zenith Radio Corporation, and dubbed &#8220;Lazy Bones&#8221; wasn&#8217;t anything like the remotes of today. For a start, it was wired into the TV, which was one of the reasons it didn&#8217;t <em>really</em> take off. It was also a simple device that consisted of few buttons, only capable of cycling through stations by triggering a motorised knob. I can&#8217;t imagine calling a product &#8220;Lazy Bones&#8221; is exactly an effective marketing message either&#8230;</p>
<p>Fortunately, Zenith backed up the &#8220;Lazy Bones&#8221; with the &#8220;Flashmatic&#8221; in 1955. It was wireless, using a beam of light pointed at one of four sensors on the TV to turn the TV on or off, change channels or adjust volume. Unfortunately, the sensor on the TV wasn&#8217;t able to differentiate between the Flashmatic light source and any other light, making its performance unpredictable.</p>
<p>In 1956, Zenith introduced the &#8220;Space Commander&#8221; which used ultrasound frequencies to change the channel wirelessly. It was a huge improvement over previous remotes, and was able to adjust volume and change channels. It was so successful that it was the predominate form of remote control until the late 1970s. It did, however, seem to annoy dogs&#8230;</p>
<p>In the late &#8217;70s, the remote went through a design revolution to the more complex systems we have today thanks to the introduction of Teletext services on the BBC. It was also the late &#8217;70s that saw infrared remotes introduced.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/history-of-tv">History of TV</a> is Giz AU’s month-long look back at the development of the world-changing medium and its influence on our daily lives. </em></p>
<p>[Pic credit: Jim Rees, source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zenith_Space_Commander_600.jpg">Wikipedia</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-did-we-ever-cope-before-the-remote-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Remote Control Is Impossible To Lose</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-remote-control-is-impossible-to-lose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-remote-control-is-impossible-to-lose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Always misplacing the remote control? You probably don&#8217;t need to go this far to ensure it doesn&#8217;t get lost again, but hey, nice work anyways. [Thereifixedit via Make]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/10/kurtr-overkill.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Always misplacing the remote control? You probably don&#8217;t need to go this far to ensure it doesn&#8217;t get lost again, but hey, nice work anyways. [<a href="http://thereifixedit.com/2009/10/22/dads-lost-the-remote-for-the-last-time/">Thereifixedit</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/10/loss-proof_remote_control.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/this-remote-control-is-impossible-to-lose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This No-Name HTPC Remote Can Work With Game Consoles?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/this-no-name-htpc-remote-can-work-with-game-consoles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/this-no-name-htpc-remote-can-work-with-game-consoles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htpc remote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this $US40 remote actually does what it says it does, then it might be one of the most useful HTPC remotes out there. It looks like a Motorola Q, but communicates over RF to its USB receiver.
Once your signals hit the receiver, you can support Windows, Linux, Mac or Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/htpc_remote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_htpc_remote.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>If this $US40 remote actually does what it says it does, then it might be one of the most useful HTPC remotes out there. It looks like a Motorola Q, but communicates over RF to its USB receiver.<span id="more-357346"></span></p>
<p>Once your signals hit the receiver, you can support Windows, Linux, Mac or Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii (supposedly). Hard to tell whether or not it can actually <i>do</i> all of these things, since the website looks like one a kid would make for his dad&#8217;s business over the summer between Primary and High School, so we&#8217;ll have to see for ourselves to be sure. [<a href="http://efo.buy-lowest.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&amp;products_id=180">EFO</a> via <a href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/09/25/control-your-pc-or-mac-with-this-wireless-handheld-keyboard-with-touchpad/">The Gadgeteer</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/09/29/compact-wireless-keyboard-with-touchpad/">Oh Gizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/this-no-name-htpc-remote-can-work-with-game-consoles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Philips Aurea Remote Dreams To Be A Mobile Phone One Day</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-philips-aurea-remote-dreams-to-be-a-mobile-phone-one-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-philips-aurea-remote-dreams-to-be-a-mobile-phone-one-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aurea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philips aurea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=351235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The glowing Philips Aurea has been out for a few years (in Europe), but the luminescent display (worthy of Jesus&#8217; teeth) is finally receiving a remote worthy of its famed eccentricity.
Each new Aurea will be bundled with this pod-style slider that we&#8217;re only telling you about because it&#8217;s a bit different than most. When closed, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/aurearemote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_aurearemote.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The glowing Philips Aurea has been out for a few years (in Europe), but the luminescent display (<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/handson_with_the_philips_aurea/">worthy of Jesus&#8217; teeth</a>) is finally receiving a remote worthy of its famed eccentricity.<span id="more-351235"></span></p>
<p>Each new Aurea will be bundled with this pod-style slider that we&#8217;re only telling you about because it&#8217;s a bit different than most. When closed, it&#8217;s reminiscent of a first-gen iPod. When open, it feels like a mobile phone aimed at tweens. And that ball at the top? No, that&#8217;s not a speaker intended for your ear. It&#8217;s the power button.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re gonna need a modder to dig into this thing with some Skype hardware or at least our MP3 collection from 2001&mdash;shouldn&#8217;t be hard, it&#8217;s basically a 4-hour loop of Lady Marmalade. [<a href="http://www.ifa.philips.com/products/pp_aurea.html">Philips</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-philips-aurea-remote-dreams-to-be-a-mobile-phone-one-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech Harmony 700 Universal Remote Gives You More Buttons</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/logitech-harmony-700-universal-remote-gives-you-more-physical-buttons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/logitech-harmony-700-universal-remote-gives-you-more-physical-buttons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmony 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech harmony 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=351210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The $US150 Logitech Harmony 700 is much like their other non-touchscreen universal remotes in that you have a load of physical buttons to push. However, the 700 is difference since it gives you four physically labelled activity keys.
When using Logitech remotes, the point is to let the remote know every single appliance in your setup [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/h7001.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_h7001.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The $US150 Logitech Harmony 700 is much like their other non-touchscreen universal remotes in that you have a load of physical buttons to push. However, the 700 is difference since it gives you four physically labelled activity keys.<span id="more-351210"></span></p>
<p>When using Logitech remotes, the point is to let the remote know every single appliance in your setup so you can focus on &#8220;activities&#8221;, such as watching TV, or playing your Xbox, or watching a Blu-ray on your PS3. That way your remote knows exactly which thing needs to be on&mdash;and which boxes don&#8217;t&mdash;for what you want to do. Since these activities are now tied to a separate physical button, you can just hit that button instead of scrolling through a list in order to get where you&#8217;re going. It saves a few seconds each time, but adds up over years of TV watching.</p>
<p><script> gawkerGallery(5351385,3,''); </script></p>
<p>Other features on the 700 include a colour LCD screen, rechargeable AAs and compatibility with the standard Logitech remote setup program. It will be available in September. [<a href="http://blog.logitech.com/2009/09/03/ready-to-entertain-new-logitech-harmony-700-remote/">Logitech</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/logitech-harmony-700-universal-remote-gives-you-more-physical-buttons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu-Link Universal Remote Handles PS3 With Other Devices</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/blu-link-universal-remote-handles-ps3-with-other-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/blu-link-universal-remote-handles-ps3-with-other-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smk-link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=350687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SMK-Link claims that their new Bluetooth/infrared Blu-Link universal remote is the first to allow users control over their PlayStation 3 and their other home entertainment devices from a single unit.
 Additional Features:
&#8226; Blu-Link offers advanced PS3 button shape and colours and dedicated buttons for Triangle, Circle, Square, X, Select, Home and Start, Blu-Ray DVD controls [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/blu-link_remote_-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_blu-link_remote_-2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>SMK-Link claims that their new Bluetooth/infrared Blu-Link universal remote is the first to allow users control over their PlayStation 3 and their other home entertainment devices from a single unit.<span id="more-350687"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Additional Features:</p>
<p>&bull; Blu-Link offers advanced PS3 button shape and colours and dedicated buttons for Triangle, Circle, Square, X, Select, Home and Start, Blu-Ray DVD controls for Top Menu, Popup Menu, Angle, Audio Channel and Subtitle movie features<br />
&bull; Blu-Link is an &#8220;advanced learning&#8221; remote: learning button assignments from existing remotes; and user-configurable.<br />
&bull; Blu-Link&#8217;s non-volatile memory retains button assignments even when it&#8217;s 2 AA batteries have been removed<br />
&bull; Blu-Link supports more than 400 brands of standard and HDTV television and flatscreens, 150 VCR brands, 200 Satellite Receiver models, 100 Cable TV Receiver brands, 50 DVR models and 200 home theatre surround sound systems</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The Blu-Link is available starting today with a price tag of $US50. Not a bad deal if you have like 20 remotes sitting on your coffee table. Consolidate! [<a href="http://www.smklink.com/index.php?id=NzY0">SMK-Link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/blu-link-universal-remote-handles-ps3-with-other-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Files Patent For Tweeting TV Remote</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ibm-files-patent-for-tweeting-tv-remote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ibm-files-patent-for-tweeting-tv-remote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter remote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good lord, this is all we need. A TV remote that allows users to easily ramble on about the shows they watch via their blog or twitter account. For better or worse, IBM appears to be working on this technology.

 A viewer selects a media program to view by use of a remote controller with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ibm_twitter_remote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ibm_twitter_remote.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Good lord, this is all we need. A TV remote that allows users to easily ramble on about the shows they watch via their blog or twitter account. For better or worse, IBM appears to be working on this technology.<span id="more-349836"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ibm_twitter_remote_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ibm_twitter_remote_2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p> A viewer selects a media program to view by use of a remote controller with networking capability.</p>
<p>Upon the viewer wishing to send a blog posting to a blog, the viewer determines whether a tag to be included in the blog posting is to be a pre-existing tag or a custom tag, wherein the blog posting comprises program information about the media program useful to identify the media program. If the tag is to be a pre-existing tag, the viewer selects the pre-existing tag from a plurality of pre-existing tags using the remote controller and if the tag is to be a custom tag, the viewer generates the custom tag using the remote controller.</p>
<p>If a protocol provided by the remote controller to send the blog posting to the blog allows a snapshot of the media program to be included in the blog posting, the remote controller takes the snapshot of the media program and includes it in the blog posting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> So, the device would let you blog or tweet and communicate with your followers about what you are watching via a networked remote control. Again, it&#8217;s only a patent at this point, but is this remote something you could see yourself using? [<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&amp;r=5&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;co1=AND&amp;d=PTXT&amp;s1=Facebook&amp;OS=Facebook&amp;RS=Facebook">Patent</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/28/ibm-files-patent-for-geek-couch-potato-dream-a-tv-remote-that-tweets/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ibm-files-patent-for-tweeting-tv-remote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remotes On The List Of Things Man Never Needed To Waterproof</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/add-sony-remotes-to-the-list-of-things-man-never-needed-to-waterproof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/add-sony-remotes-to-the-list-of-things-man-never-needed-to-waterproof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one electronic device that I use on a daily basis yet has never let me down through a lack of durability, it&#8217;s the standard television remote. Pretty much every brand on the market is built like a tank.
Yet Sony is marketing a RM-PZ3SD waterproof remote in spite of this fact, and putting it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/RM-PZ3SD.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_RM-PZ3SD.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>If there&#8217;s one electronic device that I use on a daily basis yet has never let me down through a lack of durability, it&#8217;s the standard television remote. Pretty much every brand on the market is built like a tank.<span id="more-349748"></span></p>
<p>Yet Sony is marketing a RM-PZ3SD waterproof remote in spite of this fact, and putting it on sale in Japan next month for $US29.</p>
<p>Am I missing some key piece of market research? Does a large segment of the population, unbeknownst to me, have a pool in their living room? Are scuba divers sporting 52-inch Bravias on their backs, cursing at their inability to change the channel to Discovery HD while deep sea diving?</p>
<p>You know what would be great, Sony? If you just came out and said, &#8220;We have no unique ideas pertaining to a new line of remotes. So stick with what you&#8217;ve been using and things will probably be alright, barring an aquatic act of God that will probably destroy your TV and every other possession you hold dear anyway.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.ecat.sony.co.jp/avacc/avacc/acc/index.cfm?PD=35088&amp;KM=RM-PZ3SD">Sony</a> via <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/sony_waterproof_universal_remote_controls.php">New Launches</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/add-sony-remotes-to-the-list-of-things-man-never-needed-to-waterproof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borders Don&#8217;t Understand The Concept Of A Universal Remote</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/borders-dont-understand-the-concept-of-a-universal-remote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/borders-dont-understand-the-concept-of-a-universal-remote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal remotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the cover of the latest Borders catalogue. Obviously Borders don&#8217;t actually understand that once you invest in a universal remote, you don&#8217;t actually need to keep your five other remotes on the couch next to you while you watch TV. 
The catalog did get one thing right though: A universal remote would make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/08/borders-catalog.png" alt="borders-catalog" title="borders-catalog" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-349381" />This is the cover of the latest Borders catalogue. Obviously Borders don&#8217;t actually understand that once you invest in a universal remote, you don&#8217;t actually need to keep your <em>five other remotes</em> on the couch next to you while you watch TV. <span id="more-349380"></span></p>
<p>The catalog did get one thing right though: A universal remote would make a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/win-your-dad-a-logitech-harmony-1100i-universal-remote/">great father&#8217;s day present</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/borders-dont-understand-the-concept-of-a-universal-remote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
