<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; red</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/red/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The RED Digital Film Cameras: Big Spec Lists, Big Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-red-digital-film-cameras-big-specs-and-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-red-digital-film-cameras-big-specs-and-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red dsmc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve drooled over accessories for RED&#8217;s line of digital still and motion cameras, but now we&#8217;ve got some specs for the actual DSMCs. No release dates yet, but looks like the EPIC-X with its $US28,000 price will come first.
The first of the two models we&#8217;re being teased with is the incredibly high-end EPIC-X which will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/red1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_red1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>We&#8217;ve drooled over <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-accessories-coming-to-destroy-the-galaxy/">accessories</a> for RED&#8217;s line of digital still and motion cameras, but now we&#8217;ve got some specs for the actual DSMCs. No release dates yet, but looks like the EPIC-X with its $US28,000 price will come first.<span id="more-364033"></span></p>
<p>The first of the two models we&#8217;re being teased with is the incredibly high-end EPIC-X which will be released in four stages, beginning with a pre-production model dubbed TATTOO and ending with the wide-spread final release model. The details explain the $US28,000 price tag:</p>
<blockquote><p> * New MYSTERIUM-X 5K sensor<br />
* 5K (2:1) at 1-100fps<br />
* 4K (2:1) at 1-125fps<br />
* Quad HD at 1-120fps<br />
* 3K (2:1) at 1-160fps<br />
* 2K (2:1) at 1-250fps<br />
* 1080P (scaled from full frame) at 1-60fps<br />
* Increased Dynamic Range, reduced noise<br />
* Time Lapse, Frame Ramping<br />
* REDCODE 250<br />
* ISO 200-8000<br />
* New FLUT colour Science<br />
* Completely Modular System, each Module individually upgradeable<br />
* Independent Stills and Motion Modes (both record full resolution REDCODE RAW)<br />
* 5 Axis Adjustable Sensor Plate<br />
* Multiple Recording Media Options (Compact Flash, 1.8&#8243; SSD, RED Drives, RED RAM)<br />
* Wireless REDMOTE control<br />
* Touchscreen LCD control option<br />
* Bomb-EVF, RED-EVF and RED-LCD compatible<br />
* Multiple User Control Buttons<br />
* Interchangeable Lens mounts including focus and iris control of electronic RED, Canon and Nikon lenses (along with Zoom data)<br />
* &#8220;Touch Focus Tracking&#8221; with electronic lens mounts and RED Touchscreen LCDs<br />
* LDS and /i Data enabled PL Mount<br />
* Rollover Battery Power<br />
* Independent LUTs on Monitor Outputs<br />
* Independent Frame Guides and Menu overlays on Monitor Outputs<br />
* Monitor Ports support both LCD and EVF<br />
* True Shutter Sync In/Out and Strobe Sync Out<br />
* 720P, 1080P and 2K monitoring support<br />
* Gigagbit Network interface and 802.11 Wireless interface<br />
* 3 Axis internal motion sensor, built in GPS receiver<br />
* Enhanced Metadata<br />
* Full size connectors on Pro I/O Module. AES Digital Audio input, single and dual link HD-SDI<br />
* Support for RED, most Arri 19mm, Studio 15mm, 15mm Lite, Panavision and NATO accessories<br />
* Dimensions- Approx. 4&#8243;x4&#8243;x5.5&#8243;<br />
* Weight (Brain only)- Approx. 6 lbs (2.72kg)</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The other temptress is the Scarlet 2/3-inch, which is &#8220;more akin to current video-shooting DSLRs, though it doesn&#8217;t have a full frame sensor&#8221;. As with the EPIC-X, there&#8217;s no release date given. There are some great specs though:</p>
<blockquote><p> * Increased REDCODE data rates<br />
* New FLUT colour, Gamma and Sensitivity Science. Now same as EPIC.<br />
* More extensive modular system integration.<br />
* Interchangeable Lens mounts including focus and iris control of electronic RED, Canon and Nikon lenses, along with Zoom data (Scarlet 2/3&#8243; Interchangeable)<br />
* &#8220;Touch Focus Tracking&#8221; with electronic lens mounts and RED touchscreen LCD&#8217;s (Scarlet 2/3&#8243; Interchangeable and 8x Fixed)<br />
* Two independent microphone level channels, balanced input circuits, 48V Phantom Power, digitized at 24-bit 48KHz.<br />
* GigaBit Ethernet port<br />
* Scaled 1080P at 60fps</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here are a bunch of pictures of the gadgets to drool over (or mock):</p>
<p><strong>Actual RED Pre-Production Unit, Parts, and Details</strong><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/5c/gallery_red01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red08.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/42/gallery_red08.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a></a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red09.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/a4/gallery_red09.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red10.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/ad/gallery_red10.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red11.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/23/gallery_red11.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red12.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/09/gallery_red12.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red13.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/db/gallery_red13.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red15.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/8c/gallery_red15.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><strong>Accessory and Camera Renders</strong><br />
<A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/f7/gallery_red02.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red03.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/4c/gallery_red03.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red04.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/3b/gallery_red04.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red05.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/ed/gallery_red05.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red07.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/38/gallery_red07.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red14.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/25/gallery_red14.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/red16.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/ec/gallery_red16.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>[<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=37011">Red User</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/red-dsmc-specs-detailed-prices-start-at-28-000-for-epix-x-low/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-red-digital-film-cameras-big-specs-and-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Accessories Coming To Destroy The Galaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-accessories-coming-to-destroy-the-galaxy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-accessories-coming-to-destroy-the-galaxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red accessories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red has just unveiled eight accessories for the cameras, to be released this month. No prices have announced, but these things look so amazingly sleek and menacing that they could be parts stolen from alien spaceships in Area 51.
Red Mini LCD will show you what the camera is framing in real time.
Red Pro I/O has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/redbombevf_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_redbombevf_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Red has just unveiled eight accessories for the cameras, to be released this month. No prices have announced, but these things look so amazingly sleek and menacing that they could be parts stolen from alien spaceships in Area 51.<span id="more-358879"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1254027355.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1254027355.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Mini LCD will show you what the camera is framing in real time.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253950012.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253950012.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Pro I/O has HD-SDI out and HDMI out, two channels of Balanced Mic Audio in, one headphone out, 48v Phantom power, RS-242 and a Genlock/GPIO.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253992538.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253992538.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Gunner will allow the user to aim their custom Red like a rifle.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253946240.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253946240.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Volt — a hot swappable battery.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1254011482.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1254011482.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Bomb Electronic View Finder connects to the Red bodies.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/1253972295.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/1253972295.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Scarlet r— the final look for the <a href=-"http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/red_scarlet_3k_hd_pocket_pro_camera_under_3000-2/">3K HD pocket pro camera</a>.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/1254042665.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/1254042665.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>REDmote — this remote will allow for remote control of both Epic and Scarlet.<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253977007.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1253977007.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Red Epic — the body of <A href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/red_launches_5k_red_epic_flagship_camera-2/">Red&#8217;s highest end 5K camera</a>.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>Parts of alien spaceships, or Darth Vader&#8217;s sexual toys. I can go both ways. Check each accessory name and description in the gallery, along with the Epic and Scarlet camera bodies. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=35497">Red User Forums</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-accessories-coming-to-destroy-the-galaxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Epic Used To Shoot Sexiest Woman Alive At 5K Resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-at-5k-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-at-5k-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate beckinsale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megan Fox may have been sexy enough to use the 3K resolution Red Epic video camera to shoot with, but the sexiest woman alive needs 5K. Kate Beckinsale is an extra 2K sexier than Megan Fox.

It&#8217;s technologically interesting since, with both the 3K and the 5K Red cameras, they&#8217;re able to take video and strategically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Megan Fox may have been sexy enough to use the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/">3K resolution Red Epic video camera</a> to shoot with, but the <em>sexiest woman alive</em> needs 5K. Kate Beckinsale is an extra 2K sexier than Megan Fox.<span id="more-357955"></span></p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="500" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=4249779001" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=42085298001&#038;playerID=4250084001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=42085298001&#038;playerID=4250084001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="500" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
<p>It&#8217;s technologically interesting since, with both the 3K and the 5K Red cameras, they&#8217;re able to take video and strategically take out frames to use as stills. This makes it a lot easier on the photographer since he doesn&#8217;t need to know, intuitively, when the best few seconds are to snap a stream of shots &mdash; he can just point the thing and tell Kate to be sexy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad for Kate though, because in order to crown a new Sexiest Woman Alive next year, Esquire will have to have her put down. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/sexy-kate-beckinsale-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-at-5k-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using The Red One Camera To Make A &#8216;Living Movie Poster&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dlsrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We&#8217;ve seen the Red One blur the line between DSLRs and HD cameras with Esquire&#8217;s video-still Megan Fox cover, but this video shows how a photography studio that shoots movie posters has used it to blend photography and video even more.
And here&#8217;s one of the finished products:

[Alexx Henry]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="377"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377"></embed></object></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen the Red One blur the line between DSLRs and HD cameras with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/">Esquire&#8217;s video-still Megan Fox cover</a>, but this video shows how a photography studio that shoots movie posters has used it to blend photography and video even more.<span id="more-337441"></span></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one of the finished products:<br />
<object width="502" height="377"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377"></embed></object></p>
<p>[<a href="http://alexxhenry.com/blog/?p=475">Alexx Henry</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The First Foxy Magazine Cover to Be Shot In Video</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we told you that Esquire had shot their June magazine cover in video. This week, we see that Megan Fox photo in all its&#8230;wait, there is no way &#8220;Fox&#8221; is her real name.


Captured on the 4K RedOne (that&#8217;s a frame resolution of 4096&#215;2304, or 9.4 megapixels), the video-sourced cover image is thought to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/megan-fox-esquire-cover.jpg" alt="" />Last week we told you that Esquire had <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2.html">shot their June magazine cover</a> in <em>video</em>. This week, we see that Megan Fox photo in all its&#8230;wait, there is <em>no way</em> &#8220;Fox&#8221; is her real name.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: photography, 4k, digital cameras, june esquire, magazines, megan fox, megan fox esquire, red one, redone --><br />
<span id="more-335333"></span>
<p>Captured on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/red+one">4K RedOne</a> (that&#8217;s a frame resolution of 4096&#215;2304, or 9.4 megapixels), the video-sourced cover image is thought to be a first in the magazine industry, challenging traditional SLR photography and the distinctions of photo vs video.</p>
<p>In other good news, there&#8217;s a pile of leftover Megan Fox footage that&#8217;s up at Esquire now. But in one of humanity&#8217;s great travesties, the clips have been downrezzed for web streaming. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RED Scarlet Test Footage Hits the &#8216;Nets Looking Like a Gift From the Gods</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/red_scarlet_test_footage_hits_the_nets_looking_like_a_gift_from_the_gods-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/red_scarlet_test_footage_hits_the_nets_looking_like_a_gift_from_the_gods-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/red_scarlet_test_footage_hits_the_nets_looking_like_a_gift_from_the_gods-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love that RED&#8217;s upcoming Scarlet camera will cost around $US2500 and can produce beautiful footage like this. Paired with a 100mm RED PRIME PRO lens here, the 2/3&#8243; Scarlet captures footage at 3K resolution.


Jarred Land from RED says this is the first footage from the 2/3&#8243; Scarlet prototypes and that the frame above was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/03/custom_1236984418725_1_izzy2.jpg" alt="" />I love that RED&#8217;s upcoming <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/red_unloads_modular_cameras_a_dslr_3d_and_em28kem-2.html">Scarlet camera</a> will cost around $US2500 and can produce beautiful footage <a href="http://redgrabs.com/izzy/">like this</a>. Paired with a 100mm RED PRIME PRO lens here, the 2/3&#8243; Scarlet captures footage at 3K resolution.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: video cameras, cameras, red, red one, red scarlet, scarlet, scarlet 2/3, video --><br />
<span id="more-330707"></span>
<p>Jarred Land from RED says this is the first footage from the 2/3&#8243; Scarlet prototypes and that the frame above was pulled straight from the <a href="http://redgrabs.com/izzy/">video</a>. He also says this &#8220;heavily compressed&#8221; and &#8220;quick and dirty.&#8221; We should all aspire to assemble things as quickly and dirtily as this. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27537">RED Forums</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/red_scarlet_test_footage_hits_the_nets_looking_like_a_gift_from_the_gods-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Xbox Coming</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/red_xbox_coming-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/red_xbox_coming-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/red_xbox_coming-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kotaku notes that a NZ Halo Wars press release makes mention of an EB exclusive Red Xbox 360 Elite. [Kotaku]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kotaku notes that a NZ Halo Wars press release makes mention of an EB exclusive Red Xbox 360 Elite. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5156170/red-xbox-360-mentioned-officially-by-microsoft">Kotaku</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: microsoft, elite, red, red xbox, xbox --><br />
<span id="more-327905"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/red_xbox_coming-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resident Evil 5 Xbox 360 Is Red Like Dead Zombie Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/resident_evil_5_xbox_360_is_red_like_dead_zombie_blood-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/resident_evil_5_xbox_360_is_red_like_dead_zombie_blood-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resident evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/resident_evil_5_xbox_360_is_red_like_dead_zombie_blood-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ars has the scoop on Microsoft&#8217;s sick Resident Evil 5 Xbox 360 bundle: Red Xbox 360 and controller, Resident Evil 5, theme AND free download of Super Street Fighter II Turbo HD Remix. Hot. [Ars]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/re5bundle.jpg" style="display:block;" />Ars has the scoop on Microsoft&#8217;s sick Resident Evil 5 Xbox 360 bundle: Red Xbox 360 and controller, Resident Evil 5, theme AND free download of Super Street Fighter II Turbo HD Remix. Hot. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2009/01/23/exclusive-microsoft-to-get-resident-evil-5-bundle-red-360s">Ars</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: xbox 360, capcom, microsoft, red xbox 360, resident evil, resident evil 5, street fighter, xbox --><br />
<span id="more-324148"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/resident_evil_5_xbox_360_is_red_like_dead_zombie_blood-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dream HD Camcorder Showdown: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Red One</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ newVideoPlayer("/canon5dredone_gizmodo.flv", 475, 286,""); I don&#8217;t understand Norwegian, so the only info I heard was that the Red One has a greater dynamic range than the 5D Mark II. But the pictures and video tell the story vividly, wordlessly.


Norwegian news outfit NRKbeta conducted this little showdown at the film studio the Jar, with the first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/canon5dredone_gizmodo.flv", 475, 286,""); </script>I don&#8217;t understand Norwegian, so the only info I heard was that the Red One has a greater dynamic range than the 5D Mark II. But the pictures and video <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;langpair=no|en&#038;u=http://nrkbeta.no/red-vs-canon-5d-mark-ii-del-2/&#038;prev=/language_tools">tell the story vividly, wordlessly</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital cameras, 5d, 5d mark ii, camcorder, camcorders, cameras, canon, dslr, dslrs, hd, red, red one --><br />
<span id="more-322606"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/canonredone1.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Norwegian news outfit NRKbeta conducted this little showdown at the film studio the Jar, with the first two scenes shot with controlled lighting. Here, the Red One is way more detailed, with a superior dynamic range compared to the 5D Mark II (which is plagued some nasty washouts in the second scene). That said, the super-saturated (if unrealistic) colour from the 5D looks way more delicious and it still has less noise than Red in the first scene. <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/canonredone2.jpg" width="804" height="228" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/canonredone3.jpg" width="804" height="275" style="display:block;float:none;" />Outside, at night, however, it&#8217;s completely the 5D&#8217;s game (which <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/canon_5d_mark_iis_full_hd_video_is_so_stunning_our_eyes_explode-2.html">we kinda already knew</a>). You can barely see anything with the Red ONE footage, but the video from the 5D Mark II looks fantastic.</p>
<p>Not bad for a $US2700 camera up against a $US17,500 one. NRK stresses that this whole setup is an informal, non-scientific showdown, but it&#8217;s close enough for me. [<a href="http://nrkbeta.no/en/red-vs-canon-5d-mkii-del-1/">NRK Beta</a>, <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;langpair=no|en&#038;u=http://nrkbeta.no/red-vs-canon-5d-mark-ii-del-2/&#038;prev=/language_tools">NRK Beta</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sanctuary Crew Sure Does Like Their RED Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santuary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanctuary isn&#8217;t a terribly popular (or interesting) show, but it does look nice. It&#8217;s no coincidence, then, that they&#8217;re the first North American production to exclusively use RED cameras .


As a production, Sanctuary has taken a lot of risks&#8212;they were also the first TV show to go almost completely green-screened, depending on rendered backgrounds for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/Picture_5.jpg" style="display:block;" /></a><em>Sanctuary</em> isn&#8217;t a terribly popular (or interesting) show, but it does <em>look</em> nice. It&#8217;s no coincidence, then, that they&#8217;re the first North American production to exclusively use RED cameras .</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: red, cameras, red cameras sanctuary, red one, sanctuary, sci-fi, sci-fi channel, tv, video --><br />
<span id="more-322490"></span>
<p>As a production, <em>Sanctuary</em> has taken a lot of risks&mdash;they were also the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/first_entirely_green_screen_show_coming_to_tv-2.html">first TV show to go almost completely green-screened</a>, depending on rendered backgrounds for many of their shots. Oddly enough, this technique allowed the RED to really shine.</p>
<p>The crew gushes over the RED One, speaking mostly about its ease of use and versatility, and hinting that its reasonable price allowed the cameramen to spend a bit more on cinema-grade lenses. The most important ability of the RED, as far as <em>Sanctuary</em> is concerned, is resolution. With digital chopping an manipulation the name of the game, it&#8217;s vital that individual components of the video can be cut and integrated into a composite scene without losing clarity, something which the One&#8217;s massive 4k sensor makes possible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to note how using a camera like this changes the production dynamics of a show; reviewing and editing footage occurs almost instantly, rather than hours later as in a traditional film production. So interesting is the production scheme, in fact, that it&#8217;s the most interesting thing about this entire show. Oh well! [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php">Dvice</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
