<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; red one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/red-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gifts For People Who Think They&#8217;re The Next Scorsese</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/gifts-for-people-who-think-theyre-the-next-scorsese/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/gifts-for-people-who-think-theyre-the-next-scorsese/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift guide 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you know someone in film school, or just some guy who really likes going to the movies and cutting YouTube mashups? Here&#8217;s what you can buy them &#8212; and also what you shouldn&#8217;t:
Flip Mino HD: We tested basically every pocket camcorder in existence, and this was one of the best. It shoots 720p HD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you know someone in film school, or just some guy who really likes going to the movies and cutting YouTube mashups? Here&#8217;s what you can buy them &mdash; and also what you shouldn&#8217;t:<span id="more-367791"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_ultra_glam.jpg" alt="" class="right" /><strong>Flip Mino HD:</strong> We <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison/">tested basically every pocket camcorder in existence</a>, and this was one of the best. It shoots 720p HD and is easy enough for your grandma to use. If you&#8217;re buying a gift for someone looking to experiment on a budget or simply shoot vacation videos, this is a great little cam. <strong>$AU298</strong> [<a href="http://www.theflip.com/en-au/">Flip</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_clapboard__reup.jpg" alt="" class="right" /><strong>Clapboard:</strong> No, I&#8217;m serious. Though this might just look like a cheesy prom prop (and that&#8217;s what it is), little has changed about the most recognised icon of the film industry. And for filmmakers, it&#8217;s still extremely handy in tracking good takes, and syncing sound, if needed. The novelty ones are cheap (and many are probably more for show); but splurge on a fancy dry erase version if you really love the recipient. <strong>$US2 to $US30</strong> [<a href="http://www.promwishescatalog.com/prom/Directors-Clapboard-with-Chalk.cfm">Prom Wishes</a> ; <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/573959-REG/Pearstone_SADC_7562_SADC_7562_Acrylic_Dry_Erase.html">B&#038;H</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/50376967.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_50376967.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Vintage Hollywood Photographs from <em>Life</em> Magazine:</strong> Vintage posters are neat, but I&#8217;d contend that these <em>Life</em> prints feel a tad more heart-felt. From Kubrick working on <em>2001</em> to Marilyn Monroe doing her thing, there are many gems to be found in Life&#8217;s archives. <b>About $US100</b> [<a href="http://www.life.com/image/50377029/in-gallery/24631/2001-a-space-odyssey"><i>2001</i> Series</a>; <a href="http://www.life.com/service/shop">More Life Photos</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_tonynewnew.jpg" alt="" class="right" /><strong>Iron Man Arc Reactor:</strong> Most people&#8217;s latent super powers are still off in hiding, but you never know when a nemesis will rip out your power core, forcing you to crawl across your home for a spare. Don&#8217;t look at the Iron Man Arc Reactor as a superfluous purchase; see it as an investment your loved one&#8217;s health. <strong>$US150</strong> [<a href="http://www.museumreplicas.com/p-1008-iron-man-arc-reactor-tony-starks-heart.aspx">Museum Replicas</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sonysnewnew.jpg" alt="" class="right" /><strong>Sony UWP-V1 Wireless Lavalier Mic:</strong> During my tenure in broadcast and commercial production, I found a good, wireless lavalier mic to be the most versatile tool in my bag. It can be hidden anywhere on a body/prop, and the pickup frequencies are surprisingly decent for foleying. Sony&#8217;s entry level mic, the UWP-V1, should serve any young filmmaker well. <strong>$US485</strong> [<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/553681-REG/Sony_UWP_V1_3032_UWP_V1_Wireless_Lavalier_ENG.html">B&#038;H</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/504x_img_8014.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_img_8014.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Kodak Five-Day Cinematography Workshop:</strong> Few of us will ever have the chance to shoot on real 35mm film. But Kodak&#8217;s boot camp will teach you the basics of 35mm cinematography and give you a chance to burn some 35mm stock while experts hold your hand. The tuition is by no means a non-factor, but come on, it&#8217;s pretty much the coolest fantasy camp without Michael Jordan or spaceships. The workshop is only offered in LA&#8230; <strong>$US2000</strong> [<a href="http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Education/Workshops/cineWkshp.htm">Kodak</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_backnobuy.jpg" alt="" class="right" /><strong>DON&#8217;T BUY <em>Back to the Future 2</em> Hat:</strong> I know, it&#8217;s neat you can buy this hat. But it looked dumb on Marty McFly and it will look even worse on whoever you give it to. [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001RJ1U6G">Amazon</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_redonenew.jpg" alt="" class="right" /><strong>4K Red One Camera:</strong> Yes, the body itself starts at nor far under $US20,000 &mdash; without lenses, mounts, CF modules or pretty much anything you&#8217;ll need to use it. Yes, this camera is just as hard to shoot with as any full-fledged film camera (if not even harder). But it&#8217;s also the cheapest 4K camera you can acquire, and for the price of one extended 35mm camera rental, you&#8217;ll have a system that&#8217;s &#8220;free to use&#8221; again and again. Just make sure to gift those cinematography classes first. <strong>From $US17,500</strong> [<a href="http://static.red.com/store">Red</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><i>Don&#8217;t forget to recommend your own favourite gift ideas for movie buffs in the comments.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/gift-guide-2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favourite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We&#8217;ll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/gifts-for-people-who-think-theyre-the-next-scorsese/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Turbo (That Video Game Movie Shot On A Red One) Now</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/watch-turbo-that-video-game-movie-shot-on-a-red-one-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/watch-turbo-that-video-game-movie-shot-on-a-red-one-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A few months back, I wrote about Turbo, a USC graduate thesis shot for under $US100K on a Red One camera that used some well-designed effects to capture one potential future of gaming. Now it&#8217;s online for free.
My favourite guilty pleasure moments? The opening fight scene (the best one, IMHO) and a moment when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="375"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6932347&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6932347&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375"></object></p>
<p>A few months back, I wrote about <em>Turbo</em>, a USC graduate thesis shot for under $US100K on a <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/red-one">Red One</a> camera that used some well-designed effects to capture one potential future of gaming. Now it&#8217;s online for free.<span id="more-358770"></span></p>
<p>My favourite guilty pleasure moments? The opening fight scene (the best one, IMHO) and a moment when the protagonist&#8217;s head goes through a crane game.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, <em>Turbo</em> manages to cram all of Hollywood&#8217;s cheesiest motifs into one 20-minute flick. But everything from the visual effects to the cinematography to the fight choreography look pretty freaking good for such a low budget action short. And hey, the plot is still better than any <em>Mortal Kombat</em> and/or <em>Street Fighter movie</em> yet produced.</p>
<p>And if you really dig it, Wonder Woman screenwriter Brent Strickland is shopping around a feature-length screenplay now. [<a href="http://www.turbothemovie.com/">Turbo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/watch-turbo-that-video-game-movie-shot-on-a-red-one-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using The Red One And 5d Mark II To Create Living Magazines</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/using-the-red-one-and-5d-mark-ii-to-create-living-magazines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/using-the-red-one-and-5d-mark-ii-to-create-living-magazines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5d mark ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex henry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Magazines are going down the crapper as a medium, but the crew at Alexx Henry photography envisions a world where OLED and eInk screens put motion into mags and makes them cutting-edge.
Is this what the future of publishing looks like? Well, I&#8217;d be pretty surprised if these techs became anywhere close to disposable anytime soon. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="308"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3WeaC5QDUpg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3WeaC5QDUpg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308"></object></p>
<p>Magazines are going down the crapper as a medium, but the crew at Alexx Henry photography envisions a world where OLED and eInk screens put motion into mags and makes them cutting-edge.<span id="more-358397"></span></p>
<p>Is this what the future of publishing looks like? Well, I&#8217;d be pretty surprised if these techs became anywhere close to disposable anytime soon. Instead, we&#8217;ll be seeing things like the Apple Tablet and Microsoft Courier coming along to load up stuff like this. But despite the packaging differences, the finished product loaded on these next-gen displays could be pretty similar to this. And it looks pretty badass. [<a href="http://livingartmedia.com/outside/">Living Art Media</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/using-the-red-one-and-5d-mark-ii-to-create-living-magazines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Epic Used To Shoot Sexiest Woman Alive At 5K Resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-at-5k-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-at-5k-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate beckinsale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megan Fox may have been sexy enough to use the 3K resolution Red Epic video camera to shoot with, but the sexiest woman alive needs 5K. Kate Beckinsale is an extra 2K sexier than Megan Fox.

It&#8217;s technologically interesting since, with both the 3K and the 5K Red cameras, they&#8217;re able to take video and strategically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Megan Fox may have been sexy enough to use the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/">3K resolution Red Epic video camera</a> to shoot with, but the <em>sexiest woman alive</em> needs 5K. Kate Beckinsale is an extra 2K sexier than Megan Fox.<span id="more-357955"></span></p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="500" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=4249779001" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=42085298001&#038;playerID=4250084001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=42085298001&#038;playerID=4250084001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="500" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
<p>It&#8217;s technologically interesting since, with both the 3K and the 5K Red cameras, they&#8217;re able to take video and strategically take out frames to use as stills. This makes it a lot easier on the photographer since he doesn&#8217;t need to know, intuitively, when the best few seconds are to snap a stream of shots &mdash; he can just point the thing and tell Kate to be sexy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad for Kate though, because in order to crown a new Sexiest Woman Alive next year, Esquire will have to have her put down. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/sexy-kate-beckinsale-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-at-5k-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sexiest Woman Alive, Filmed At Delicious 5K Super High Res</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-sexiest-woman-alive-filmed-at-delicious-5k-super-high-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-sexiest-woman-alive-filmed-at-delicious-5k-super-high-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Esquire shot Megan Fox in 3K resolution using the Red One. This year, they&#8217;re going to 5K (yes, 5K, meaning you can see her pores) for the Sexiest Woman Alive, using Red&#8217;s Epic. Here&#8217;s a (low res) taste.

We&#8217;ll have to wait another month for another teaser as they pull the slow reveal. Still, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sexiestwoman.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Last year, Esquire <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/">shot Megan Fox</a> in 3K resolution using the Red One. This year, <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/who-is-the-sexiest-woman-alive-2009">they&#8217;re going to 5K</a> (<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/reds_5k_4k_and_3k_pro_cameras_what_the_resolution_really_means-2/">yes, 5K</a>, meaning you can see her pores) for the Sexiest Woman Alive, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/red_launches_5k_red_epic_flagship_camera-2/">using Red&#8217;s Epic</a>. Here&#8217;s a (low res) taste.<span id="more-353518"></span></p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=4249779001" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=40054316001&#038;playerID=4250084001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&#038;publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=40054316001&#038;playerID=4250084001&#038;domain=embed&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to wait another month for another teaser as they pull the slow reveal. Still, not a bad way to show off the Epic&#8217;s Mysterium-X sensor. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/who-is-the-sexiest-woman-alive-2009">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-sexiest-woman-alive-filmed-at-delicious-5k-super-high-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using The Red One Camera To Make A &#8216;Living Movie Poster&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dlsrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We&#8217;ve seen the Red One blur the line between DSLRs and HD cameras with Esquire&#8217;s video-still Megan Fox cover, but this video shows how a photography studio that shoots movie posters has used it to blend photography and video even more.
And here&#8217;s one of the finished products:

[Alexx Henry]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="377"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377"></embed></object></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen the Red One blur the line between DSLRs and HD cameras with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/">Esquire&#8217;s video-still Megan Fox cover</a>, but this video shows how a photography studio that shoots movie posters has used it to blend photography and video even more.<span id="more-337441"></span></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one of the finished products:<br />
<object width="502" height="377"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377"></embed></object></p>
<p>[<a href="http://alexxhenry.com/blog/?p=475">Alexx Henry</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The First Foxy Magazine Cover to Be Shot In Video</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we told you that Esquire had shot their June magazine cover in video. This week, we see that Megan Fox photo in all its&#8230;wait, there is no way &#8220;Fox&#8221; is her real name.


Captured on the 4K RedOne (that&#8217;s a frame resolution of 4096&#215;2304, or 9.4 megapixels), the video-sourced cover image is thought to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/megan-fox-esquire-cover.jpg" alt="" />Last week we told you that Esquire had <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2.html">shot their June magazine cover</a> in <em>video</em>. This week, we see that Megan Fox photo in all its&#8230;wait, there is <em>no way</em> &#8220;Fox&#8221; is her real name.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: photography, 4k, digital cameras, june esquire, magazines, megan fox, megan fox esquire, red one, redone --><br />
<span id="more-335333"></span>
<p>Captured on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/red+one">4K RedOne</a> (that&#8217;s a frame resolution of 4096&#215;2304, or 9.4 megapixels), the video-sourced cover image is thought to be a first in the magazine industry, challenging traditional SLR photography and the distinctions of photo vs video.</p>
<p>In other good news, there&#8217;s a pile of leftover Megan Fox footage that&#8217;s up at Esquire now. But in one of humanity&#8217;s great travesties, the clips have been downrezzed for web streaming. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_first_foxy_magazine_cover_to_be_shot_in_video-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megan Fox Esquire Cover Shot In Video, Not Stills</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If the fusion of video cameras and dSLRs hadn&#8217;t blurred enough before, Esquire shot their June issue cover of Megan Fox in video&#8212;a purported first in the magazine world.


Rather than click and endless series of stills, photographer Greg Williams shot the cover with the 4K Red ONE video camera. Fox essentially acted out a scene [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/meganfoxesquire.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>If the fusion of video cameras and dSLRs hadn&#8217;t blurred enough before, Esquire shot their June issue cover of Megan Fox in <em>video</em>&mdash;a purported first in the magazine world.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: photography, dslrs, esquire, magazines, megan fox, megan fox esquire cover, red, red one, redone --><br />
<span id="more-335021"></span>
<p>Rather than click and endless series of stills, photographer <a href="http://www.gregfoto.com/">Greg Williams </a>shot the cover with the 4K <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/red+one">Red ONE</a> video camera. Fox essentially acted out a scene for 10 minutes, the best moment of which will appear on the June 2009 cover. (Not to be wasteful of Megan Fox footage, the video will also be uploaded to Esquire&#8217;s site, of course.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fascinating that as digital cameras evolve, so will the roles of photographers, models and publications. I can&#8217;t see traditional photography ever dying, but whether photos will always be captured in photographs is another question. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-images-0609">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/megan_fox_esquire_cover_shot_in_video_not_stills-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dream HD Camcorder Showdown: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Red One</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ newVideoPlayer("/canon5dredone_gizmodo.flv", 475, 286,""); I don&#8217;t understand Norwegian, so the only info I heard was that the Red One has a greater dynamic range than the 5D Mark II. But the pictures and video tell the story vividly, wordlessly.


Norwegian news outfit NRKbeta conducted this little showdown at the film studio the Jar, with the first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/canon5dredone_gizmodo.flv", 475, 286,""); </script>I don&#8217;t understand Norwegian, so the only info I heard was that the Red One has a greater dynamic range than the 5D Mark II. But the pictures and video <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;langpair=no|en&#038;u=http://nrkbeta.no/red-vs-canon-5d-mark-ii-del-2/&#038;prev=/language_tools">tell the story vividly, wordlessly</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital cameras, 5d, 5d mark ii, camcorder, camcorders, cameras, canon, dslr, dslrs, hd, red, red one --><br />
<span id="more-322606"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/canonredone1.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Norwegian news outfit NRKbeta conducted this little showdown at the film studio the Jar, with the first two scenes shot with controlled lighting. Here, the Red One is way more detailed, with a superior dynamic range compared to the 5D Mark II (which is plagued some nasty washouts in the second scene). That said, the super-saturated (if unrealistic) colour from the 5D looks way more delicious and it still has less noise than Red in the first scene. <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/canonredone2.jpg" width="804" height="228" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/canonredone3.jpg" width="804" height="275" style="display:block;float:none;" />Outside, at night, however, it&#8217;s completely the 5D&#8217;s game (which <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/canon_5d_mark_iis_full_hd_video_is_so_stunning_our_eyes_explode-2.html">we kinda already knew</a>). You can barely see anything with the Red ONE footage, but the video from the 5D Mark II looks fantastic.</p>
<p>Not bad for a $US2700 camera up against a $US17,500 one. NRK stresses that this whole setup is an informal, non-scientific showdown, but it&#8217;s close enough for me. [<a href="http://nrkbeta.no/en/red-vs-canon-5d-mkii-del-1/">NRK Beta</a>, <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;langpair=no|en&#038;u=http://nrkbeta.no/red-vs-canon-5d-mark-ii-del-2/&#038;prev=/language_tools">NRK Beta</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/dream_hd_camcorder_showdown_canon_5d_mark_ii_vs_red_one-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sanctuary Crew Sure Does Like Their RED Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santuary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanctuary isn&#8217;t a terribly popular (or interesting) show, but it does look nice. It&#8217;s no coincidence, then, that they&#8217;re the first North American production to exclusively use RED cameras .


As a production, Sanctuary has taken a lot of risks&#8212;they were also the first TV show to go almost completely green-screened, depending on rendered backgrounds for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/Picture_5.jpg" style="display:block;" /></a><em>Sanctuary</em> isn&#8217;t a terribly popular (or interesting) show, but it does <em>look</em> nice. It&#8217;s no coincidence, then, that they&#8217;re the first North American production to exclusively use RED cameras .</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: red, cameras, red cameras sanctuary, red one, sanctuary, sci-fi, sci-fi channel, tv, video --><br />
<span id="more-322490"></span>
<p>As a production, <em>Sanctuary</em> has taken a lot of risks&mdash;they were also the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/first_entirely_green_screen_show_coming_to_tv-2.html">first TV show to go almost completely green-screened</a>, depending on rendered backgrounds for many of their shots. Oddly enough, this technique allowed the RED to really shine.</p>
<p>The crew gushes over the RED One, speaking mostly about its ease of use and versatility, and hinting that its reasonable price allowed the cameramen to spend a bit more on cinema-grade lenses. The most important ability of the RED, as far as <em>Sanctuary</em> is concerned, is resolution. With digital chopping an manipulation the name of the game, it&#8217;s vital that individual components of the video can be cut and integrated into a composite scene without losing clarity, something which the One&#8217;s massive 4k sensor makes possible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to note how using a camera like this changes the production dynamics of a show; reviewing and editing footage occurs almost instantly, rather than hours later as in a traditional film production. So interesting is the production scheme, in fact, that it&#8217;s the most interesting thing about this entire show. Oh well! [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php">Dvice</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_emsanctuaryem_crew_sure_does_like_their_red_cameras-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
