<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; recession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/recession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft May Lay Off 5,000 More Employees</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/microsoft_may_lay_off_5000_more_employees-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/microsoft_may_lay_off_5000_more_employees-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financiapocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/microsoft_may_lay_off_5000_more_employees-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This follows up their 1,400 count layoff in January, which were its first ever. Maybe it can use some of that $US11 million in stimulus money to build a bridge so the poor people who got laid off can live under it. [Seattle Times]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This follows up their 1,400 count layoff in January, which were its first ever. Maybe it can use some of that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/microsoft_uses_11_million_in_stimulus_money_to_build_bridge_to_itself-2.html">$US11 million</a> in stimulus money to build a bridge so the poor people who got laid off can live under it. [<a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/soundeconomywithjontalton/2009176778_microsoft_layoffs_send_mixed_m.html">Seattle Times</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: microsoft, business, economy, layoffs, microsoft layoffs --><br />
<span id="more-335436"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/microsoft_may_lay_off_5000_more_employees-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Save Money by Getting Product Ideas From Users, Not Paying Them</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/google_to_save_money_by_getting_product_ideas_from_users_not_paying_them-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/google_to_save_money_by_getting_product_ideas_from_users_not_paying_them-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/google_to_save_money_by_getting_product_ideas_from_users_not_paying_them-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has figured out that it can save money by getting product ideas from users rather than engineers. After all, you can&#8217;t pay engineers in &#8220;shout outs&#8221; on their blogs like their offering for users.


Yes, the tanking economy is hitting the mighty Google just as hard as every other company out there, and they&#8217;re having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/ProductIdeas.jpg" />Google has figured out that it can save money by getting product ideas from users rather than engineers. After all, you can&#8217;t pay engineers in &#8220;shout outs&#8221; on their blogs like their offering for users.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: google, depression, engineers, recession, software --><br />
<span id="more-321128"></span>
<p>Yes, the tanking economy is hitting the mighty Google just as hard as every other company out there, and they&#8217;re having to cut costs as a result. Gone is the 20% time that allowed engineers to dedicate one day a week to pet projects. And hell, why pay those engineers at all? Users can come up with ideas just as well as they can, and they don&#8217;t even have to pay them.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the idea behind the new Google Product Ideas blog, a place for people to submit and vote on ideas for new Google products. And what if you come up with a genius idea that makes Google millions of dollars? &#8220;If you post an idea or suggestion and we put it into action, we may give you a shout out on our Product Ideas blog, but we won&#8217;t be compensating users for their ideas.&#8221; Don&#8217;t be evil, indeed. [<a href="http://googleproductideas.blogspot.com/">Google Product Ideas</a> via <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F02%2F0037254&#038;from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/google_to_save_money_by_getting_product_ideas_from_users_not_paying_them-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financiapocalypse Kneecaps Christmas Gadget Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/financiapocalypse_kneecaps_christmas_gadget_sales-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/financiapocalypse_kneecaps_christmas_gadget_sales-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/financiapocalypse_kneecaps_christmas_gadget_sales-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analysts knew it would be bad, but not this bad. Retail sales this year are down 5.5% in November and 8% in December overall, but electronics specifically fell by an astounding 27%.


Consumer electronics are always hit harder than average in tight times, but massive drop confirms what my various visits at barely-busy big box retailers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/oopsithewholeeconomy.jpg" style="display:block;" />Analysts knew it would be bad, but not <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123025036865134309.html"><em>this</em> bad</a>. Retail sales this year are down 5.5% in November and 8% in December overall, but electronics specifically fell by an astounding 27%.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: the economy, christmas, christmas gadget sales, consumers electronics sales, recession, retail, retail sales --><br />
<span id="more-320501"></span>
<p>Consumer electronics are always hit harder than average in tight times, but massive drop confirms what my various visits at barely-busy big box retailers led me to suspect. But what else can we find in this data? And is it really as bad as it looks?</p>
<p>First of all, the category that fell by 27% is titled &#8220;Electronics/Appliances&#8221;, so it&#8217;s <em>possible</em> that things are OK in Gadgetland, and pure carnage in Whirlpoolville. But probably not. Second, the data shows a inverse correlation between a drop in sales and utility. This isn&#8217;t to say that gadgets are superfluous luxury items&mdash;you won&#8217;t hear that here&mdash;but rather that the other categories like, you know, <em>shoes</em>, contain products that probably take priority over USB humping dogs and Monster cables.</p>
<p>Oh well. Expect to hear plenty more about these numbers when Q4 earnings reports start trickling out, like tears of disappointment onto so many plimsolls. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123025036865134309.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/financiapocalypse_kneecaps_christmas_gadget_sales-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caption Contest: Recession Laptop</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/caption_contest_recession_laptop-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/caption_contest_recession_laptop-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caption contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/caption_contest_recession_laptop-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;All set. Now, only 23 more payments and this beauty will be all mine.&#8221; [Midget Quest -- Thanks B.B.]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/84_20Redneck_20Laptop.jpg" style="display:block;" />&#8220;All set. Now, only 23 more payments and this beauty will be all mine.&#8221; [<a href="http://midgetquest.blogspot.com/2008/12/recession-laptop.html">Midget Quest</a> -- Thanks B.B.]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: caption contest, desktop laptop, laptop, recession laptop --><span id="more-317596"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/caption_contest_recession_laptop-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dash To Can Its Hardware Biz, Licence Its Web-Connected Nav OS To Other Devices</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dash_to_can_its_hardware_biz_licence_its_webconnected_nav_os_to_other_devices-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dash_to_can_its_hardware_biz_licence_its_webconnected_nav_os_to_other_devices-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dash express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satnavs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dash_to_can_its_hardware_biz_licence_its_webconnected_nav_os_to_other_devices-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve always been fans of the Dash Express, with its real-time web-delivered traffic monitoring and its constantly evolving app platform. Somewhat sad news today is that Dash Navigation will be pulling out of the consumer hardware business entirely and cutting 50 jobs (two-thirds of its work force)&#8211;enabling them to move toward licensing their innovative software [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gallery/4/2008/03/thumb800x800_2365143684_6942c32974_o.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />We&#8217;ve always been fans of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/dash_express_nextgen_gps_navig.html">Dash Express</a>, with its real-time web-delivered traffic monitoring and its constantly evolving app platform. Somewhat sad news today is that Dash Navigation will be pulling out of the consumer hardware business entirely and cutting 50 jobs (two-thirds of its work force)&#8211;enabling them to move toward licensing their innovative software platform to other GPS nav makers, as well as to mobile phones and MID platforms in the future. But in a lot of ways, the move makes perfect sense.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: dash, dash express, economy, gps, nav, recession --><br />
<span id="more-313403"></span>
<p>The nav market is a tough one, and with the added economic difficulties, Dash feels it can do better work by focussing on their open-source OS, which they will then sell business-to-business. More important than the OS, which is fine but not fantastic, is the back end traffic mesh system. A Dash-powered mid-range Garmin nav sounds like a pretty appealing prospect, and will help bring a Dash-like system to more people for less dough. New CEO Rob Currie also notes that the Dash&#8217;s GPRS chip and 400MHz ARM processor are quickly being outpaced by even low-end mobiles, so a move toward adding Dash functionality to GPS-equipped smartphones sounds like a plan to me.</p>
<p>Dash is going to keep the Express back end running for existing owners, but no word on for how long; because these devices hold almost zero local data, once the service goes you will have yourself a nav that can&#8217;t do much more than direct address routing. Dash friends, care to let us know how long we have? [<a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/11/03/dash-charts-a-new-course-cutting-50-jobs/">GigaOM</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dash_to_can_its_hardware_biz_licence_its_webconnected_nav_os_to_other_devices-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla Motors Gets a $US40m Cash Recharge, Probably Won&#8217;t Disappear</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/tesla_motors_gets_a_40m_cash_recharge_probably_wont_disappear-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/tesla_motors_gets_a_40m_cash_recharge_probably_wont_disappear-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla roadster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/tesla_motors_gets_a_40m_cash_recharge_probably_wont_disappear-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fresh off a pretty huge round of layoffs, their Detroit office closure and a flurry of rumours about their solvency, Tesla Motors has been promised $US40m in financing. Considering the fact that Elon Musk, mildly successful space invader and the owner of the company, had admitted just a few weeks ago that the company only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/2008_Tesla_Roadster.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Fresh off a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tesla_lays_off_90_of_detroit_staff_in_douchey_way-2.html">pretty huge round of layoffs</a>, their Detroit office closure and a <a href="http://valleywag.com/5072392/tesla-ceo-admits-his-carmakers-running-out-of-cash">flurry of rumours</a> about their solvency, Tesla Motors has been promised $US40m in financing. Considering the fact that Elon Musk, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/spacex_falcon_1_finally_gets_into_orbit_makes_history-2.html">mildly successful space invader</a> and the owner of the company, had <a href="http://valleywag.com/5072392/tesla-ceo-admits-his-carmakers-running-out-of-cash">admitted</a> just a few weeks ago that the company only had about $US9m in bank, this new investment probably means the difference between customers getting their cars on time and Tesla, well, dissolving. So, Tesla, you&#8217;ve got your money &mdash; can we have <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/tesla_teases_us_with_model_s_4door_sedans_butt-2.html">our sedan</a>, please? [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/tesla-promised-another-40-million/">NYT</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: electric car, electric cars, elon musk, recession, telsa roadster, tesla, tesla motors --><br />
<span id="more-313340"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/tesla_motors_gets_a_40m_cash_recharge_probably_wont_disappear-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computers Screw Stock Market Even More Than It&#8217;s Already Screwed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/computers_screw_stock_market_even_more_than_its_already_screwed-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/computers_screw_stock_market_even_more_than_its_already_screwed-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/computers_screw_stock_market_even_more_than_its_already_screwed-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if we didn&#8217;t have enough with the stock market going down in flames on its own, computers have decided to screw them a little bit more and make everyone go &#8220;WTF&#8221; for a few minutes this morning. After dropping around two hundred gazillion points yesterday, today the Dow Jones industrials saw another drop of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/tradingplaces.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />As if we didn&#8217;t have enough with the stock market going down in flames on its own, computers have decided to screw them a little bit more and make everyone go &#8220;WTF&#8221; for a few minutes this morning. After dropping around two hundred gazillion points yesterday, today the Dow Jones industrials saw another drop of 700 points, which was suddenly reduced to 125 and then went down again. Everyone thought &#8220;rebound&#8221; for a second there, until they realised what was really happening.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: recession, computers, crisis, market, stock --><br />
<span id="more-309924"></span>
<p>The reason of the sudden swing was artificial, caused by a large chunk of computer-driven orders that pushed the values up, only to drop down again after these were processed. At least according to the Associated Press, which says that this early roller coaster was &#8220;likely caused&#8221; by these orders, which &#8220;kicked-in when prices had fallen far enough to make some stocks look like an attractive bet. But that buying reflected no lifting of the market&#8217;s deep despair, and selling continued.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh noes. Maybe we should all cheer up and let computers run the whole thing for a while then. Or just send stocks to hell altogether. [<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFbWfgPT08MAD93NLU480">AP</a> -- Thanks OMGponies]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/computers_screw_stock_market_even_more_than_its_already_screwed-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
