<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; raid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/raid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photofast CR-7200 CompactFlash Adapter Runs Four MicroSDs In RAID</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/photofast-cr-7200-compactflash-adapter-runs-four-microsds-in-raid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/photofast-cr-7200-compactflash-adapter-runs-four-microsds-in-raid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Tzeng</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compactflash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compactflash adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cr-7200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cr7200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photofast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photofast cr-7200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new CompactFlash adaptor from Photofast can hold four 16GB microSD cards running in RAID. This makes the slower microSD format as fast as CompactFlash by striping data across all four microSD cards at once.
For those that don&#8217;t need 64GB of storage, the CR-7100 will hold one 16GB microSD, while the
CR-7000 holds one 32GB SD. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/a8a8a51d97abb9961ad454e1c3d02306.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The new CompactFlash adaptor from Photofast can hold four 16GB microSD cards running in RAID. This makes the slower microSD format as fast as CompactFlash by striping data across all four microSD cards at once.<span id="more-339554"></span></p>
<p>For those that don&#8217;t need 64GB of storage, the CR-7100 will hold one 16GB microSD, while the<br />
CR-7000 holds one 32GB SD. The 7200 will be available for $US30 and the 7100 and 7000 for $US25, all in July. [<a href="http://www.photofast.co.jp/index_adapter.html">Photofast</a> via <a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news_details.php?id=18372">Akihabara</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/06/custom_1245975501766_PhotoFast_CR-7100_01_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/06/custom_1245975610413_080524cr7000_2_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/photofast-cr-7200-compactflash-adapter-runs-four-microsds-in-raid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WD&#8217;s My Book World Edition II Offers 4TB Of RAID Network Storage</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/western-digitals-my-book-world-edition-ii-offers-4tb-of-raid-network-storage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/western-digitals-my-book-world-edition-ii-offers-4tb-of-raid-network-storage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my book world edition ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western digital my book world edition ii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WD&#8217;s new NAS drives, the My Book World Edition II, packs either 2 or 4TB of storage in a dual-drive RAID array. It seems like a pretty solid system for those dangerously paranoid about the safety of their data.
The My Books can connect either as an NAS through ethernet or simply as an external drive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/wdfMyBook_World_H1N.jpg" alt="" class="left" />WD&#8217;s new NAS drives, the My Book World Edition II, packs either 2 or 4TB of storage in a dual-drive RAID array. It seems like a pretty solid system for those dangerously paranoid about the safety of their data.<span id="more-339310"></span></p>
<p>The My Books can connect either as an NAS through ethernet or simply as an external drive through USB, and both the 2TB and 4TB versions contain two drives to watch each other&#8217;s backs in case one fails. So really, you&#8217;re getting either 1TB or 2TB of space, respectively, since one drive is used as backup. They&#8217;re available now and retail for either $US400 (2TB) or $US700 (4TB). Press release to follow. [<a href="http://www.shopwd.com/">Western Digital</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p>WD&#8217;S NEW DUAL-DRIVE MY BOOK® WORLD EDITION™ II NETWORK STORAGE SYSTEM ADDS EXTRA LEVEL OF PROTECTION<br />
FOR A FAMILY&#8217;S VALUABLE DATA </p>
<p>Offers an Easy, Double-Safe Way to Backup Computers and Share Media<br />
Throughout the Home </p>
<p>LAKE FOREST, Calif. &#8211; June 24, 2009 &#8211; WD® (NYSE: WDC), the world&#8217;s leader in external storage solutions, today introduced its newly redesigned My Book® World Edition™ II dual- drive network storage system in capacities of up to 4 TB. With the double protection of two Mirrored (RAID 1) drives and continuous backup software, the My Book World Edition II network storage system provides an extra-safe place for users to back up and store the data and digital media from all the computers on their network in one central location. Available now at select retailers and the WD online store, the new dual-drive systems join the recently introduced (Feb. 2009) My Book World Edition and are compatible with PC and Mac® computers. </p>
<p> According to a July 2008 report by research firm Parks Associates, the number of households worldwide with data networks will grow from around 170 million in 2008 to 240 million by year-end 2012. The firm also reports that the average broadband household will see its digital media storage needs grow to nearly 900 GB by year-end 2012. In addition, consumers indicate that the most important feature for a network-attached storage (NAS) device is the amount of available storage. With its massive 4 TB capacity, the My Book World Edition II network storage system will serve this rapidly growing need for home data storage.</p>
<p> The My Book World Edition II network storage system uses RAID 1 (Mirrored1) technology to automatically and continuously maintain a second copy of user&#8217;s data. If one drive in the two-drive system ever fails, the system continues to run and the data is safe. In addition, the new<br />
My Book World Edition II network hard drive includes software that simplifies the task of setting up automatic and continuous data backup for all the PCs in the home. The My Book World Edition II storage systems ship in Mirrored mode and use half the capacity for file redundancy.</p>
<p> With its media server capabilities and fast transfer speeds, this high-capacity system makes it simple to build a centralized digital media library that everyone can easily share. Music, photos and videos can be streamed directly from the My Book World Edition II storage system to any PC, Mac or connected DLNA® media player (such as TVs, Microsoft® Xbox 360 and Sony® PlayStation®3 game consoles or wireless digital pictures frames) using the integrated UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) media server and iTunes® Music server software. Users can also securely access their files from anywhere in the world through the Internet using the free MioNet® remote access service included with every My Book World Edition II storage system.</p>
<p> &#8220;Families have more and more digital media like movies, photos and music to store, share and protect. Having two drives inside the My Book World Edition II network storage system, instantaneously and automatically duplicating data, offers consumers the peace of mind of double safe, real-time protection of their valuable content,&#8221; said Dale Pistilli, vice president of marketing for WD&#8217;s branded products group. &#8220;Families can relax knowing their valuable media is backed up while enjoying the ability to stream their content to a plethora of different devices from PCs and Macs to PS3s, Xbox 360s and the latest connected TVs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Price and Availability</p>
<p> The new My Book World Edition II network storage systems are available now in 2 TB and 4 TB capacities at select retailers and WD&#8217;s online store (www.shopwd.com). MSRP for the My Book World Edition II dual-drive storage system with 4 TB is $US699.99 USD and 2 TB is $US399.99 USD.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/western-digitals-my-book-world-edition-ii-offers-4tb-of-raid-network-storage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QNAP SS-839 Pro Turbo NAS Shrinks Mega RAID To Notebook Sizes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/qnap-ss-839-pro-turbo-nas-shrinks-mega-raid-to-notebook-sizes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/qnap-ss-839-pro-turbo-nas-shrinks-mega-raid-to-notebook-sizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qnap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qnap ss-839 pro turbo nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ss-839]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The QNAP SS-839 Pro Turbo NAS is the smallest 8-bay networked attached storage solution on the market. In fact, it&#8217;s just a hair larger than a 7-inch cube.
How is it so tiny? The SS-839 uses 2.5-inch SATA drives instead of the clunky 3.5s you find in desktops (and most NAS systems). 
But beyond its compact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/SS-839Pro_05.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The QNAP SS-839 Pro Turbo NAS is the smallest 8-bay networked attached storage solution on the market. In fact, it&#8217;s just a hair larger than a 7-inch cube.<span id="more-339009"></span></p>
<p>How is it so tiny? The SS-839 uses 2.5-inch SATA drives instead of the clunky 3.5s you find in desktops (and most NAS systems). </p>
<p>But beyond its compact 4TB capacity, the SS-839 features plenty of performance enhancers, like a low-voltage Atom N270 1.6GHz processor, 2GB of RAM and 2 eSATA ports along with 5 USBs. Fully loaded with 8 hot-swappable hard drives, the system sips on just 34W&mdash;a handy side effect of its netbook/notebook components. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no word on pricing yet, but QNAP has more networking specifics over at their site. [<a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_photo.asp?p_id=124">QNAP </a>and <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090622005768&amp;newsLang=en">BW</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/qnap-ss-839-pro-turbo-nas-shrinks-mega-raid-to-notebook-sizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3.5&#8242; Floppy Disk RAID Array Provides Nearly 4MB of Usable Space</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/35_floppy_disk_raid_array_provides_nearly_4mb_of_usable_space-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/35_floppy_disk_raid_array_provides_nearly_4mb_of_usable_space-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floppy disks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/35_floppy_disk_raid_array_provides_nearly_4mb_of_usable_space-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What to do with a mess of floppy disk drives, an iMac straight out of 1995, and some free time? Daniel Blade Olson whipped up what&#8217;s almost certainly the world&#8217;s first (and only) RAID array using floppies.


Daniel took five USB floppy disk drives and through the magic of RAID managed to create one drive with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/floppy-raid-1-thumb-520x390-18415.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>What to do with a mess of floppy disk drives, an iMac straight out of 1995, and some free time? Daniel Blade Olson whipped up what&#8217;s almost certainly the world&#8217;s first (and only) RAID array using floppies.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: wtf, apple, floppy, floppy disks, floppy drive raid array, imac, raid, retromodo, usb --><br />
<span id="more-336321"></span>
<p>Daniel took five USB floppy disk drives and through the magic of RAID managed to create one drive with 4.22MB of space (3.9MB usable space). Testing revealed pretty laughable speed as well, with a 3.6MB song taking about 36 seconds to transfer, but this kind of project clearly isn&#8217;t about performance. He plans to construct an even bigger array with, he claims, 150 FDDs, which can&#8217;t possibly be a good use of his energy. [<a href="http://ohlssonvox.8k.com/fdd_raid.htm">Site</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/05/35-inch-floppy.php">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/35_floppy_disk_raid_array_provides_nearly_4mb_of_usable_space-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giz Explains: What a RAID Hard Drive Array Is (and Why You Want One)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/giz_explains_what_a_raid_hard_drive_array_is_and_why_you_want_one-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/giz_explains_what_a_raid_hard_drive_array_is_and_why_you_want_one-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/giz_explains_what_a_raid_hard_drive_array_is_and_why_you_want_one-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RAID: It&#8217;s not just for Warcraft nerds anymore. If you&#8217;ve got a ton of music, photos and video and you don&#8217;t know about RAID hard-drive arrays yet, read this&#8212;or wave your precious media files buh-bye.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/raidyo.jpg" alt="" />RAID: It&#8217;s not just for Warcraft nerds anymore. If you&#8217;ve got a ton of music, photos and video and you don&#8217;t know about RAID hard-drive arrays yet, read this&mdash;or wave your precious media files buh-bye.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: giz explains, feature, raid, redundant array of independent disks, top --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/giz_explains_what_a_raid_hard_drive_array_is_and_why_you_want_one-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Western Digital&#8217;s 8TB ShareSpace NAS is One Beast of a Storage Hub</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/western_digitals_8tb_sharespace_nas_is_one_beast_of_a_storage_hub-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/western_digitals_8tb_sharespace_nas_is_one_beast_of_a_storage_hub-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/western_digitals_8tb_sharespace_nas_is_one_beast_of_a_storage_hub-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Western Digital&#8217;s new 8TB ShareSpace NAS is a monster of a storage system for you media hoarders who want to share your good between multiple computers.


The new 8TB model is available as of this week for $US1,700, which is a lot of money for a networked storage device until you do the math: 12 cents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/wdsharespace8tb.jpg" alt="" />Western Digital&#8217;s new 8TB ShareSpace NAS is a monster of a storage system for you media hoarders who want to share your good between multiple computers.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: storage, hdds, nas, raid, sharespace, western digital --><br />
<span id="more-329529"></span>
<p>The new 8TB model is available as of this week for $US1,700, which is a lot of money for a networked storage device until you do the math: 12 cents per GB. That ain&#8217;t too shabby.</p>
<p>The ShareSpace is DLNA Certified for media streaming to devices like the Xbox 360 and PS3, and features improved read/write speeds of up to 30% for large media files. Current ShareSpace owners can download a <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=584">firmware patch</a> to get these improvements for themselves.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pricey, yes, but if you get this thing configured as a RAID array and load it up with all of your music and video, it&#8217;d be the ultimate centralised streaming storage box for your home. I want one. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=584">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/western_digitals_8tb_sharespace_nas_is_one_beast_of_a_storage_hub-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insane Hardware Driving the World&#8217;s Biggest LED Billboard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/the_insane_hardware_driving_the_worlds_biggest_led_billboard-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/the_insane_hardware_driving_the_worlds_biggest_led_billboard-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benny Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/the_insane_hardware_driving_the_worlds_biggest_led_billboard-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a dusty supply closet at 1 Times Square, a computer terminal hooked up to hordes of ethernet servers, RAID arrays and monitors humbly runs the largest LED sign in the world. The sign, a 3-sided, 17,000-square-foot Goliath, debuted last night at the opening of a Walgreens in New York City. Today, I got to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/walgreenssign.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />In a dusty supply closet at 1 Times Square, a computer terminal hooked up to hordes of ethernet servers, RAID arrays and monitors humbly runs the largest LED sign in the world. The sign, a 3-sided, 17,000-square-foot Goliath, debuted last night at the opening of a Walgreens in New York City. Today, I got to see what makes it tick. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('walgreenssign', 3, ''); </script></p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: walgreens, architecture, billboard, gadgets, led, raid, top --><br />
<span id="more-316253"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/raidarray.jpg" width="800" height="600" style="display:block;float:none;" />Each side of the sign, designed by D3 LED, requires a 48-drive RAID pumping data at a rate of 3.2GB/second to a custom-built PC. From there, the data is fed through graphics cards to multiple DVI pipes, which lead to six DVI pixel splitters (known as a Spyders). The splitters take video data of a specific resolution and upscale it to the size needed for the display. Once the data is crunched and formatted for the sign, it&#8217;s sent out via 4Gbps ethernet to one of more than 12,000 display modules that make up the ginormous billboard.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/module.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="800" height="600" style="display:block;float:none;" />Each module is a mini-computer, complete with MAC address, redundant 4-gigabit ethernet ports, power supply and a fan. Each panel can report all kinds of vital statistics, including its temperature. If there&#8217;s a problem, the panel reports itself to the main computer for easy troubleshooting. (Like a good communist, it can report problems with its neighbours, too.) The majority of the electronics are accessible from inside, so dangerous repair jobs on scaffolding suspended over Times Square are a thing of the past.</p>
<p>The sign&#8217;s modules are split into three sections, low-, medium- and high-resolution grids based on their distance from the street. (Why waste pixels for objects way high up?) The top, as you probably guessed, has the largest pixels, at 24mm, while the middle has 12mm and the bottom has 10mm.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/buildingslash.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="647" height="530" style="display:block;float:none;" />The animators are faced with a tough challenge when creating content for the signs, as they must keep the different display sizes in mind so the animation appears cohesive throughout the sections. To help out the animators, sign creator D3 LED made a virtual copy of it that is 10,000 pixels high by 4,000 pixels wide, the equivalent of 43 megapixels. (It&#8217;s 20 times the resolution of HD, too.) They use an Adobe After Effects template to help coordinate placement of the animations on the slash-shaped sign.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/17000_square_foot_led_billboard_flipped_on_at_1_times_square_wraps_around_entire_building-2.html">As previously reported,</a> a single 30-second spot on the billboard requires a staggering 150GB of data transferred through the system. But before you accuse D3 and Walgreens of hogging all of the power in New York, they attest that they are not. With the Con Ed bill in mind, their design reduced unnecessary copper wiring by over 300,000 feet and increased the voltage for more efficient power. They also set up an auto-dimmer (like you might have on your laptop) that adjusts the luminosity of the LEDs based on the ambient light outside. All of this makes it not necessarily cheap but at least cheaper than you&#8217;d think to operate.</p>
<p>The Walgreens sign is a complex, fascinating testament to the sheer power of LED displays. While most people living in New York avoid Times Square exactly because of things like this, tourists will undoubtedly flock to the centre to observe the sign up close, even though it can be seen from as far away as Bryant Park and the Port Authority. For now, it&#8217;s something that even this semi-jaded NYC resident can appreciate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/the_insane_hardware_driving_the_worlds_biggest_led_billboard-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Choose the Best Network Storage for a Mac/PC Home</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/how_to_choose_the_best_network_storage_for_a_macpc_home-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/how_to_choose_the_best_network_storage_for_a_macpc_home-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/how_to_choose_the_best_network_storage_for_a_macpc_home-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/hardware/How_To_Choose_the_Best_Network_Storage_for_a_Mac_PC_Home_2';  
Network-attached storage options are more abundant than ever, but jumping into the copious bush of NAS can be quite a task, especially if you want a system that plays nice with both PC and Mac. Macs have historically been an unreasonably complex challenge for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/freenas_howto_top2.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript"> digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/hardware/How_To_Choose_the_Best_Network_Storage_for_a_Mac_PC_Home_2'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"> </script></div>
<p>Network-attached storage options are more abundant than ever, but jumping into the copious bush of NAS can be quite a task, especially if you want a system that plays nice with both PC and Mac. Macs have historically been an unreasonably complex challenge for many networking products, and NAS was no exception. Here I&#8217;ve assessed the usefulness of three different cash-conscious strategies for setting up a Mac-and-PC-friendly NAS: Building a NAS out of an old PC, using a router with an external USB drive and buying a dedicated product.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: how to, airport extreme, disk station, ds207+, feature, freenas, guide, hard drives, mybook, nas, network attached storage, raid, synology, top, western digital --><span id="more-311859"></span>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re wondering why you need a NAS at all. The answer is that you have too much stuff to <i>not</i> have one. How do I know? Because even my parents have a billion photos on their hard drive, and they know nothing of BitTorrent and Handbrake. An NAS sits there in a corner, a blinking, quietly purring guardian of all those song, video and photo files. It holds it all, streams it to just about anything else on the network, and even keeps a redundant copy safe on a separate mirrored RAID drive in case the shit really hits the fan. So yeah, you need one.</p>
<p>Here are the three systems I pieced together:<br /> &bull; My DIY system was concocted using FreeNAS software and an older ThinkPad I had lying around. This was technically the cheapest of the bunch.<br /> &bull; My router-based system was an AirPort Extreme with attached WD and LaCie USB drives, which was also &#8220;recycling&#8221; but cost a bit more.<br /> &bull; The dedicated NAS appliance I tested was a two-drive Synology DS207+, $US330 for the box but the drives themselves are sold separately.</p>
<p>To evaluate the usefulness of each financial step up, I used three main criteria: Overall performance, availability of redundant data via RAID 1, and whether it&#8217;s possible to add in features like media streaming, remote access or integrated BitTorrent.</p>
<p>In a mixed Mac/Windows environment, the main performance factor for Macs is support for Apple File Protocol for connecting network shares. AFP support is becoming more and more common in nicer NAS rigs, but it is still not a given in the cheaper range&#8211;every NAS alive supports SMB/CIFS, the more Windows-friendly protocol, so PCs generally don&#8217;t have a problem. While Macs can connect to NAS using SMB&mdash;and also NFS Unix, which you may also run across&mdash;performance wise, OS X&#8217;s SMB implementation is still shoddy compared to the apparently seamless AFP. (SMB also includes foibles such as filename length restrictions that can throw a Mac into fits.) If you&#8217;re using an NAS to its highest potential, moving a lot of data around, SMB will cause more spinning death wheels and system hangs in OS X than AFP will.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s up to you whether you want to go RAID 1 or not&#8211;you can also merge or stripe the drives for more storage but less protection. For me, redundancy is a must. I want to be able to give a NAS&#8217;s drives a workout and still breathe easy in the not entirely unlikely event of a drive blow-out. NAS add-ons like BitTorrent, remote access and integrated UPnP are nice higher-end features, but they may not be as important to you.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/NAShowto_freenas494.jpg" class="center" width="494" height="367" style="display:block;float:none;" /><strong>DIY NAS With FreeNAS</strong><br /> I took an old IBM ThinkPad X31 I had lying around and installed <a href="http://www.freenas.org/">FreeNAS</a>&#8211;an open-source operating system based on FreeBSD that is similar to the OS you&#8217;ll find in most NAS boxes. It offers similar features like RAID if the machine it&#8217;s installed on has multiple drives, and can do UPnP, FTP access and the like via a web-based admin panel just like most dedicated rigs.</p>
<p>Initial installation is actually not too tough&#8211;just burn the FreeNAS live CD and boot it, then follow the install instructions. FreeNAS will re-format your drives to the somewhat obscure UFS file system it prefers (don&#8217;t try to run it on already-formatted drives, it&#8217;s not worth the immense hassle). I was up and running with AFP and SMB sharing without too much sweat. Like Linux, FreeNAS runs on a ton of hardware, so unless you&#8217;ve got something obscure you&#8217;ll likely be in business.<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('freenasweb2', 3, ''); </script><strong>Verdict</strong>: If you&#8217;re heavy on outdated PCs and you derive pleasure from thrift and tinkering, you should give FreeNAS a try. That said, don&#8217;t expect your pig in lipstick to be a screamer. Most aging desktops would be an improvement over my 5-year-old laptop with its slow 2.5&#8243; disk, obviously, but even considering that, my real-world tests were pretty rough. Browsing large folders of files hung the system on numerous occasions, and streaming of video files (especially seeking) was choppy. As far as extras go, my PS3 recognised FreeNAS&#8217;s UPnP server but could not read any media, which would probably take some serious hackery to diagnose. Extras like an integrated BitTorrent client are available as well as open-source add-ons, but again, expect some <a href="http://www.lifeessay.com/it/nas/freenas-now-ships-with-bittorrent/">heavy tinkering</a>. Still, if you have unused hardware, try this option first.</p>
<p><strong>Total Cost</strong>: Free, ideally; factor in $US150 bucks for a few new drives.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/NAShowto_aex494.jpg" width="494" height="320" style="display:block;float:none;" /><strong>Router with Shared External USB Drive</strong><br /> I&#8217;ve had bad luck in my previous, brief attempts at attaching USB storage to routers&#8211;rough performance and dropped connections abounded. This was with a few older non-Apple 802.11g routers, but naturally, I assumed the AirPort Extreme base station&#8217;s AirPort Disk feature for connecting external drives was going to suck as bad. I was wrong.<br /> <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('airportint', 3, ''); </script></p>
<p><strong>Verdict</strong>: In day-to-day use for media storing, sharing and streaming, the AirPort Disk works pretty much without a hitch. I connected both a WD MyBook Mirror with RAID 1 and an older LaCie 300GB single-disk drive. In both cases, setup took literally 15 seconds after plugging in the drive&mdash;there are only a few config options to deal with in the AirPort Utility app to set access controls&mdash;and after that, it appeared as a shared volume source on Windows machines and Macs automatically. Browsing files and loading music in iTunes loaded without any noticeable difference from when my library was connected via USB, and streaming large video files to a PS3 with UPnP was skip-free.</p>
<p><strong>Total Cost</strong>: $US200 <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136282">WD MyBook Mirror 1TB</a> + $US165 for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Apple-AirPort-Extreme-Station-MB053LL/dp/B000UZCR56/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1224778297&#038;sr=1-2">AirPort Extreme on Amazon</a>, so you&#8217;re looking at $365. Chances are, you already have a USB drive and maybe even the AirPort, so the cost goes down considerably. (I do recommend acquiring a RAID 1 dual-drive, though.) Keep in mind, part of this sunk cost includes a solid 802.11n router, which you need anyway. There are, of course, several other 802.11n routers from the networking biggies that offer a USB connection for sharing. If you&#8217;ve had a good experience with any of these when connecting via <i>both</i> PCs and Macs, let us know in the comments.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/NAShowto_syno494.jpg" class="center" width="494" height="357" style="display:block;float:none;" /><strong>Dedicated NAS</strong><br /> A ready-to-go NAS is the most obvious choice for adding network storage, but it can also be the most perilous. Go too cheap, and your box probably won&#8217;t support the Mac-tastic AFP. And even if it does, its performance may still be under par and its add-on features may not be good enough to warrant the added expense.</p>
<p>One of the most affordable AFP-equipped, well-reviewed NAS devices is the <a href="http://www.synology.com/enu/products/DS207+/index.php">Synology DS207+</a> which, at $US330 before you even buy the drives, isn&#8217;t cheap at all. (If you don&#8217;t have some drives lying around, the total cost will approach $US500.) I picked it because, according to NAS aficionados like the folks at Small Network Builder with their handy <a hr<br />
ef="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_nas/Itemid,190/">NAS Charts</a>, it yielded the best value in what I was looking for. Above the improved compatibility, it throws in tasty perks like a BitTorrent manager for downloading directly to the NAS, UPnP for streaming to a compatible TV or PS3, and a nice web-based control interface you can access from anywhere. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('synologyweb', 3, ''); </script><br /> <strong>Verdict:</strong> Performance was the sour note here, surprisingly. While a large file transfer took roughly same amount of time as it did on the other configurations, doing things that required many quick reads, like opening my iTunes music folder with thousands of artist subfolders in Finder, took days on either a MacBook Pro via AFP, or a PS3 via UPnP. Using iTunes to locate the source MP3 file of a song playing hung up the Finder for so long it crashed. Loading a photo library in Aperture or Lightroom was equally painful, with frequent stalls.</p>
<p>I shouldn&#8217;t fully write-off an unseen quirk with my particular network setup. The folks at Synology thought everything sounded kosher, but did point out that the AirPort Extreme router I used for testing does not support jumbo frames (a way of optimizing gigabit ethernet traffic) so some gains could be reaped there with a different router. Also, much of my testing was done over 802.11g&#8211;browsing on a wireless N connection may fare better, although slowness was apparent on both the PS3 and my laptop when both were connected via gigabit ethernet, which should be blazing.</p>
<p>Dedicated NAS systems do provide extras such as UPnP, remote access via FTP or SSH, a built-in web server, and more. Still, your computer can already handle those just as well. With the drive attached as a network volume, your computer can act as the conduit even if it&#8217;s got nothing stored locally, serving media and giving remote access to a local drive. A built-in Torrent client is the one I could see being useful, so if you&#8217;re a heavy Torrenter, consider that.</p>
<p><strong>Total Cost</strong>: <a href="http://www.provantage.com/synology-ds207~7SYNO007.htm">$US330 for the NAS</a> + approximately $US160 (2 x 500GB drive) = $US490. Yes, you can go cheaper (especially if you only need a single drive), but you will likely lose the Mac&#8217;s AFP speed advantage.</p>
<p><strong>Final Verdict</strong><br /> The quickest and simplest route out of the three is definitely an AirPort Disk, and it&#8217;s also, somewhat surprisingly, a performance winner in my real-world testing. Still, on a different network setup&mdash;if your primary machines are wired, for instance&mdash;the results could swing heavily back toward a dedicated box like the DS207+, so this isn&#8217;t to say dedicated rigs should be written off completely. It&#8217;s important to pick the best performing NAS for your setup, but do it while sticking to our strategy: Start by spending as little as possible; if you&#8217;re unsatisfied, move up in baby steps.</p>
<p>And yes, Windows-only networks don&#8217;t have to jump through quite so many hoops when it comes to network storage, since SMB/CIFS support is the default in low-cost boxes, which works just fine in a Windows-only environment. If you don&#8217;t have a network with both Macs and PCs, there are a number of different routes you can take here that may be cheaper or more suited to what you need. Our three options offer a good balance of performance while keeping both platforms (and Linux, too) relatively happy.</p>
<p><i>NAS-land can get pretty crazy, and subject to the particular interactions of each person&#8217;s own gear, so by all means throw in your own experiences and recommendations in the comments, and further help folks who are jumping into the NAS game for the first time.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/how_to_choose_the_best_network_storage_for_a_macpc_home-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SimpleTech Duo Pro: 4 Interfaces, 3 Terabytes, 2 Drives, 1 Happy Nerd</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/simpletech_duo_pro_4_interfaces_3_terabytes_2_drives_1_happy_nerd-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/simpletech_duo_pro_4_interfaces_3_terabytes_2_drives_1_happy_nerd-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simpletech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/simpletech_duo_pro_4_interfaces_3_terabytes_2_drives_1_happy_nerd-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are plenty of dual-hard-drive outboard storage systems on the market, but SimpleTech&#8217;s Duo Pro struck me as particularly brimming with awesomeness. It&#8217;s not a NAS&#8212;it&#8217;s totally local&#8212;but you have a choice of USB 2.0, FireWire 400 and 800, and eSATA, which clocks a max transfer speed of 3Gb per second. (That&#8217;s gigabits, not gigabytes.) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/SimpleTech-Duo-Pro_front-view.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />There are plenty of dual-hard-drive outboard storage systems on the market, but SimpleTech&#8217;s Duo Pro struck me as particularly brimming with awesomeness. It&#8217;s not a NAS&mdash;it&#8217;s totally local&mdash;but you have a choice of USB 2.0, FireWire 400 and 800, and eSATA, which clocks a max transfer speed of 3Gb per second. (That&#8217;s gigabits, not gigabytes.) You can naturally do RAID 0 or 1, and though the current options are a 1TB total for $US280, a 1.5TB total for $US420 and a 2TB version for $US550, you will be able to choose a 3TB config when the winter winds start to blow. Have a look at the back of this in the photo below the jump. [<a href="http://www.simpletech.com/products/storage/duo-pro-drive">SimpleTech</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: storage, 3tb, fabrik, hard drives, raid, simpletech, simpletech duo pro --><br />
<span id="more-308031"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/SimpleTech-Duo-Pro_back-view.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="494" height="411" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/simpletech_duo_pro_4_interfaces_3_terabytes_2_drives_1_happy_nerd-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WD MyBook Mirror Edition: Nothing Says &#8216;Safe&#8217; Like a Personal 2TB RAID Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/wd_mybook_mirror_edition_nothing_says_safe_like_a_personal_2tb_raid_drive-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/wd_mybook_mirror_edition_nothing_says_safe_like_a_personal_2tb_raid_drive-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/wd_mybook_mirror_edition_nothing_says_safe_like_a_personal_2tb_raid_drive-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ WD just launched a drive that looks awfully familiar: Because the WD MyBook Mirror Edition houses two 3.5&#8243; GreenPower drives&#8212;in this case either 500GB or 1TB each&#8212;it uses the same case as the networked MyBook World Edition. But this one is just for you, and you alone. The Mirror, which costs US$550 for 2TB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/WD_MyBook_Mirror.jpg" class="left"/> WD just launched a drive that looks awfully familiar: Because the WD MyBook Mirror Edition houses two 3.5&#8243; GreenPower drives&mdash;in this case either 500GB or 1TB each&mdash;it uses the same case as the networked MyBook World Edition. But this one is just for you, and you alone. The Mirror, which costs US$550 for 2TB version and US$290 for a single TB, has only a USB 2.0 jack on the back. It comes Windows-formatted (though there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/western_digital_my_book_studio_edition_ii_has_esata_better_mac_support-2.html">also one for Macs</a>). As its name suggests, it comes RAID 1 (mirror) configured, but it can be set for striping instead, if that&#8217;s how your geek flag flies. [<a href="http://wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=466">Western Digital</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  storage ,  2tb ,  hard drives ,  mybook ,  mybook mirror ,  raid ,  raid 1 ,  wd ,  western digital  --><br />
<span id="more-293985"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/wd_mybook_mirror_edition_nothing_says_safe_like_a_personal_2tb_raid_drive-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
