<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; radiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/radiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How Mobile Phones Are Changing Our Brains</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-mobile-phones-are-changing-our-brains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-mobile-phones-are-changing-our-brains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this cyborg life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transthyretin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve spent a lot of time this week discussing how we can use technology to change our bodies. But according to new research, one of the gadgets we rely on daily is already having a measurable effect on our brains.
Researchers at Örebro University in Sweden found that mobile phone usage increases the brain&#8217;s production of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sar-testing.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sar-testing.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>We&#8217;ve spent a lot of time this week discussing how we can use technology to change our bodies. But according to new research, one of the gadgets we rely on daily is already having a measurable effect on our brains.<span id="more-367063"></span></p>
<p>Researchers at Örebro University in Sweden found that mobile phone usage increases the brain&#8217;s production of transthyretin, a protein found in cerebrospinal fluid that cushions and protects the brain. The researchers don&#8217;t know if the increased presence of the protein is good or bad for the brain, or what kind of effects it might have in the long run.</p>
<p>Regardless of the effects, this observation is pretty wild. We&#8217;ve talked a lot about how gadgets will change our bodies, but how will our bodies change to accommodate those gadgets?</p>
<p>Maybe increased transthyretin production is brain&#8217;s last-ditch effort to fight off cancer. Or maybe it&#8217;s the first of many adaptations that will help us let technology become a part of ourselves we&#8217;ll observe in the coming years. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/cellphone-brain/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GearFactor+%28Blog+-+Gadget+Lab+%28Gear+Factor%29%29">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-mobile-phones-are-changing-our-brains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA To Bomb Monkeys With Gamma Radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/nasa-to-bomb-monkeys-with-gamma-radiation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/nasa-to-bomb-monkeys-with-gamma-radiation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkeys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear NASA, I love you, but come on&#8230; monkey radiation tests? What is this? The &#8217;50s? Are you going to resuscitate J. Edgar Hoover next? Didn&#8217;t you guys see Matthew Broderick and Helen Hunt saving the monkeys in Project X?
That&#8217;s what NASA is planning to do: use squirrel monkeys to test the possible effect of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/projectx-chimp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_projectx-chimp.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Dear NASA, I love you, but come on&#8230; monkey radiation tests? What is this? The &#8217;50s? Are you going to resuscitate J. Edgar Hoover next? Didn&#8217;t you guys see Matthew Broderick and Helen Hunt saving the monkeys in <em>Project X</em>?<span id="more-366823"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what NASA is planning to do: use squirrel monkeys to test the possible effect of radiation in humans for long-term space missions. This is the first time the agency is going to test with monkeys since the days of the Mercury Project.</p>
<p>They plan to bomb 27 squirrel monkeys with high-energy gamma-ray radiation, the equivalent of what astronauts could get in a three-year voyage. This obviously can result in two things: monkeys dying in pain or giant green monkeys destroying the whole East Coast.</p>
<p>Clearly, a lose-lose situation.</p>
<p>The $US1.75 million project has encountered strong opposition from animal welfare organisations, but NASA spokesman Bill Jeffs gives a good argument:</p>
<blockquote><p> NASA-funded research has shown that simulated space radiation can affect nerve cells in culture and also the behaviour of mice and rats, but these studies are limited in the extent they can be extrapolated to human behaviour and performance. Studies in nonhuman primates are essential to be able to best predict neurobehavioral effects of radiation on humans.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Would you prefer 27 squirrel monkeys dying in experiments or six dead astronauts in a capsule floating on the Pacific Ocean? [<a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091112-nasa-space-monkeys-radiation.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+spaceheadlines+%28SPACE.com+Headline+Feed%29">Space.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/nasa-to-bomb-monkeys-with-gamma-radiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The True, Heartbreaking Faces Of The Nuclear Era</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soviet union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I write about high-tech weapons. There&#8217;s something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to obliterate each other for centuries, so it&#8217;s easy to forget about the real consequences of this mad race. Warning: graphic images.
A few years after the United States unleashed the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Soviet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s05_00009473.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s05_00009473.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Sometimes I write about <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/weapons/">high-tech weapons</a>. There&#8217;s something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-many-nukes-will-it-really-take-to-instantly-annihilate-humanity/">obliterate each other</a> for centuries, so it&#8217;s easy to forget about the real consequences of this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/how_each_nuclearcapable_country_got_its_bombs_visualized-2/">mad race</a>. <strong>Warning: graphic images.</strong><span id="more-365713"></span></p>
<p>A few years after the United States unleashed <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/what-is-this-12/">the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki</a>, the Soviet Union tested their first nuclear warhead ever. They appropriately called it &#8220;First Lightning&#8221;, the opening of a series of 456 atomic tests that brought hell to Earth 60 years ago. For all of us, that summons terrifying but beautiful images like this into our brains:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_licorne-atomic-blast.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Sadly, to more than one million innocent people living near the Semipalatinsk Polygon &mdash; the Soviet nuclear testing site in the northeast of Kazakhstan &mdash; it means this:<br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s01_00009823.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/74/gallery_s01_00009823.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s03_00001340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/81/gallery_s03_00001340.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_s10_00000267.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/8b/gallery_s10_00000267.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_s22_00004607.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/dc/gallery_s22_00004607.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>For three generations, and more to come, those tests mean deformed babies. They mean premature aging and countless diseases caused by radiation poisoning. The bombs&#8217; ghosts still live in the dead steppe, their invisible fangs ready to suck seven years off the life of every person living around that place. That&#8217;s the difference in life-expectancy with the rest of Kazakhstan.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s not the only horror inflicted by weapons in the Soviet Union &mdash; or in the rest of the world. I recently read all about them in a fascinating book by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Kapu%C3%85%C2%9Bci%C3%85%C2%84ski">Ryszard Kapuściński</a>, one of the best journalists and writers of our time. The book, called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium_(Polish_book)"><em>Imperium</em></a>, talks about the Soviet Union through a series of adventures and trips that reach all the corners of the Red Empire. The mosaic is a frightening view of the deadliest, most insensitive killing machine that has ever existed, all through the eyes of the people who suffered it. Not even Hitler matched the horrors of Stalin and his cohorts.</p>
<p>But while Kapuściński&#8217;s raw prose have moved me to tears many times, these images by <a href="http://www.adventureswithlight.net/">Ed Ou</a> are a perfect summary of the horrors inflicted upon hundreds of millions that Kapuściński describes in his book.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s12_00004707.jpg" alt="" class="center" />However, as I watch through glassy eyes how Mayra Zhumageldina massages her daughter Zhannoor, or how 29-year-old Berik Syzdykov sings and plays piano despite being deformed and blind after being exposed to a nuclear blast while he was inside his mum&#8217;s womb, I try to smile a bit. I try to be a bit optimistic because, no matter how monstrous some men and women can be, the human spirit always seems to find a way to survive. [<a href="http://www.adventureswithlight.net/">Adventures With Light</a> and <a href="http://www.reportage-bygettyimages.com/">Getty Images</a> via <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/kazakhstans_radioactive_legacy.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-true-heartbreaking-faces-of-the-nuclear-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Programming Error Results In Radiation Overdoses</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/programming-error-results-in-radiation-overdoses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/programming-error-results-in-radiation-overdoses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct scans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In attempt to get better data, a hospital overrode default protocol on a CT scanner over a year ago. Now they&#8217;ve realised that they made a little mistake and have been giving people eight times the acceptable doses of radiation.
The issue only affected the scans of stroke patients so damage was limited to affecting about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ctscan.jpg" alt="" class="left" />In attempt to get better data, a hospital overrode default protocol on a CT scanner over a year ago. Now they&#8217;ve realised that they made a little mistake and have been giving people eight times the acceptable doses of radiation.<span id="more-360471"></span></p>
<p>The issue only affected the scans of stroke patients so damage was limited to affecting about 200 individuals over the course of the 18 months during which the error in programming went unnoticed. While those patients are experiencing symptoms of radiation poisoning, such as hair loss, there&#8217;s at least good news in that the FDA has finally issued alerts to hospitals to read the freakin&#8217; manuals before fiddling with their equipment. [<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-cedars13-2009oct13,0,1200257.story">LA Times</a> via <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/14/1614245/CT-Scan-Reset-Error-Gives-206-Patients-Radiation-Overdose">Slashdot</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/akiraohgaki/427828532/">Akira Ohgaki</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/programming-error-results-in-radiation-overdoses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moshimy iPhone Dock Protects You From 96% Of Radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/moshimy-iphone-dock-protects-you-from-96-of-radiation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/moshimy-iphone-dock-protects-you-from-96-of-radiation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone docks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moshimy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be honest: That talk about mobile phone radiation scares you a teeny-weeny-itsy-bitsy-bit, doesn&#8217;t it? Me too. Fortunately there are mobile phone docks which&#8217;ll spare you from a whoppin&#8217; 96% of the evil, cancer-causing energy. Or so the designers of this one claim.
It&#8217;s currently just a design, but Native Union, the folks who might one day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/moshi2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_moshi2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Be honest: That talk about <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/a-guide-to-mobile-phone-radiation-so-you-dont-fry-your-brains/">mobile phone radiation</a> scares you a teeny-weeny-itsy-bitsy-bit, doesn&#8217;t it? Me too. Fortunately there are mobile phone docks which&#8217;ll spare you from a whoppin&#8217; 96% of the evil, cancer-causing energy. Or so the designers of this one claim.<span id="more-358680"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s currently just a design, but Native Union, the folks who might one day peddle Michael Young&#8217;s Moshimy mobile phone dock claim that the dock offers &#8220;96% protection from the radiation emitted from every mobile phone&#8221;. Wow. Impressive. Until you keep reading for the reasoning behind that &#8220;protection&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p> [U]sing a separate handset when not actually on the move can spare the user from 96% of radiation compared to using a mobile phone directly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Ah, so it&#8217;s the distance from the actual phone that&#8217;s the protection then? OK, so how about rewriting the claim for those of us who like to hug our docks while talking on the phone? [<a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/10/05/moshi-moshi-by-michael-young-for-native-union/">Dezeen</a> via <a href="http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/moshi-moshi-cellphone-dock-becomes-a-handset-to-make-and-receive-calls/">The Design Blog</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_moshi3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_moshi3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_moshi1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_moshi1.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_moshi4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_moshi4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/moshimy-iphone-dock-protects-you-from-96-of-radiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Guide To Mobile Phone Radiation So You Don&#8217;t Fry Your Brains</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/a-guide-to-mobile-phone-radiation-so-you-dont-fry-your-brains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/a-guide-to-mobile-phone-radiation-so-you-dont-fry-your-brains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=352300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Environmental Working Group claims that recent studies show higher tumour risk in long-term mobile phone users. They admit that more research is needed but, just in case, they have created this mobile phone radiation ranking. Guess who gets a bad grade.
This is their top 10 in best phones. The mobile phone with less radiation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/cellphone-radiation.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_cellphone-radiation.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The Environmental Working Group claims that recent studies show higher tumour risk in long-term mobile phone users. They admit that more research is needed but, just in case, they have created this mobile phone radiation ranking. Guess who gets a bad grade.<span id="more-352300"></span></p>
<p>This is their top 10 in best phones. The mobile phone with less radiation (0.15 &#8211; 0.35 W/kg) is the Samsung Impression SGH-a877. Second position goes to the Motorola RAZR V8 (0.36 W/kg), and third is another Samsung, the SGH-t229.<br />
<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> 1. Samsung Impression (SGH-a877)<br />
2. Motorola RAZR V8<br />
3. Samsung SGH-t229<br />
4. Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837)<br />
5. Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627)<br />
6. Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459)<br />
7. T-Mobile Sidekick<br />
8. LG Xenon (GR500)<br />
9. Motorola Karma QA1<br />
10. Sanyo Katana II</p>
</blockquote>
<p> But wait, where are the big names? Well, as you probably guessed, <i>those</i> are the ones with the bad grades, <i>way</i> down in the list. All the iPhone models have poor scores, with the iPhone 3GS getting 0.52 &#8211; 1.19 W/kg. The Palm Pre gets a pretty lousy score too, sitting at 0.92 W/Kg, and so does the T-Mobile G1, at 1.11 W/kg.</p>
<p>So there you go: If you are paranoid, and use your mobile phone a lot without an ear piece, then better be safe than sorry, no matter what the research says now. [<a href="http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1">All mobile phones Ranking</a> and <a href="http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?phone_function=PDA">Smartphones Ranking</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/a-guide-to-mobile-phone-radiation-so-you-dont-fry-your-brains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;Space Snuggie&#8217; Could Protect Astronauts From Radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_space_snuggie_could_protect_astronauts_from_radiation-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_space_snuggie_could_protect_astronauts_from_radiation-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronauts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snuggie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_space_snuggie_could_protect_astronauts_from_radiation-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Thanks to students at North Carolina State University (my alma matter), looking like a tool may extend beyond the surly bonds of Earth. Their &#8220;Space Snuggie&#8221; concept could shield future astronauts from radiation.


Officially called the &#8220;Lunar Textshield,&#8221; this wearable blanket is made from a lightweight polymer material that has a layer of radiation shielding that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/space-snuggie.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Thanks to students at North Carolina State University (my alma matter), looking like a tool may extend beyond the surly bonds of Earth. Their &#8220;Space Snuggie&#8221; concept could shield future astronauts from radiation.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: snuggie, astronauts, blanket, lunar textshield, nasa, radiation, radiation blanket, space, space snuggie --><br />
<span id="more-335788"></span>
<p>Officially called the &#8220;Lunar Textshield,&#8221; this wearable blanket is made from a lightweight polymer material that has a layer of radiation shielding that deflects or absorbs harmful rays. The skin of the blanket also contains solar cells that help to generate electricity.</p>
<p>If NASA wants to make a permanent base on the moon, the question of how to protect our astronauts from radiation for extended periods of time needs to be addressed. Fabric like this could be the answer&mdash;but the fate of the project won&#8217;t be known until NASA and the National Institute of Aerospace RASC-AL competition concludes during a forum held from June 1st-3rd. Projects entered into the competition could wind up travelling with astronauts on future moon exploration missions. [<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/41743">Networkworld</a> via <a href="http://digg.com/space/Space_snuggie_could_keep_astronauts_safe_and_warm">Digg</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_space_snuggie_could_protect_astronauts_from_radiation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soviet Atomic Lighthouses Are Both Spooky and Deadly</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/soviet_atomic_lighthouses_are_both_spooky_and_deadly-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/soviet_atomic_lighthouses_are_both_spooky_and_deadly-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighthouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/soviet_atomic_lighthouses_are_both_spooky_and_deadly-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, back when people in Russia used big moustaches and sent other people to Siberia, there were no GPS or tacky mobile phones. But they had atomic lighthouses to light the Artic shores.


Since there was no easy way to travel by ship across the Northern coast of the Soviet Union, the smartypants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/1.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Once upon a time, back when people in Russia used big moustaches and sent other people to Siberia, there were no GPS or tacky mobile phones. But they had <i>atomic lighthouses</i> to light the Artic shores.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: boom, atomic, gallery, lighthouse, nuclear, power, soviet, soviet atomic lighthouses, soviet union --><br />
<span id="more-323061"></span>
<p>Since there was no easy way to travel by ship across the Northern coast of the Soviet Union, the smartypants of the Communist regime decided that they needed a chain of autonomous lighthouses that could run 24/7/365. The answer: light-weight nuclear reactors and a generation of lighthouse guards with four hands and six eyes.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('nuclearlighthouses', 3, ''); </script></p>
<p>Right now, these structures can be visited, if you don&#8217;t care about you or your future kids growing up extra members&#8211;the lighthouses are, obviously, contaminated with radiation. [<a href="http://englishrussia.com/?p=2198#">English Russia</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/soviet_atomic_lighthouses_are_both_spooky_and_deadly-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Phones Cause Kidney Stones and Heart Disease Now</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/mobile_phones_cause_kidney_stones_and_heart_disease_now-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/mobile_phones_cause_kidney_stones_and_heart_disease_now-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/mobile_phones_cause_kidney_stones_and_heart_disease_now-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just days after preliminary data gathered in the largest mobile phone cancer study thoroughly depressed us, a new study claims that exposure causes red blood cells to leak hemoglobin&#8212;leading to kidney stones and heart disease.


During the study, scientists exposed samples of blood to varying degrees of microwave radiation (including levels well below those emitted by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/cellphonexray_01.jpg" style="display:block;" />Just days after preliminary data gathered in the largest mobile phone cancer study <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/early_results_from_largest_ever_mobile_phone_cancer_study_are_horribly_depressing-2.html">thoroughly depressed us</a>, a new study claims that exposure causes red blood cells to leak hemoglobin&mdash;leading to kidney stones and heart disease.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: panic, cancer, cellphones, health, heart failure, kidney stones, radiation --><br />
<span id="more-320791"></span>
<p>During the study, scientists exposed samples of blood to varying degrees of microwave radiation (including levels well below those emitted by mobile phones) for periods between ten to 60 hours. No matter how you cut it, the result was hemoglobin leakage (which just <em>sounds</em> nasty). Obviously, heart disease is the most serious condition of the two, but I can tell you from experience that you don&#8217;t want any part of a kidney stone either. Those things could make even Chuck Norris cry like a little girl.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say that this test was the most thorough ever conducted, but I think deep down we all know that when all is said and done, the final verdict about mobile phone use is going to be grim. [<a href="http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/4904/54/">MINA</a> via <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2008/12/022155.htm">textually</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/mobile_phones_cause_kidney_stones_and_heart_disease_now-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Wave Chip Protects Against Scary, If Not Scientifically Proven, Threat of Mobile Phone Radiation</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ewave_chip_protects_against_scary_if_not_scientifically_proven_threat_of_mobile_phone_radiation-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ewave_chip_protects_against_scary_if_not_scientifically_proven_threat_of_mobile_phone_radiation-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Chow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ewave_chip_protects_against_scary_if_not_scientifically_proven_threat_of_mobile_phone_radiation-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Mobile Phone radiation is spawning worries that it can do everything from making sperm stupid to popping popcorn&#8230; which means it&#8217;s prime time to start selling &#8220;cures&#8221; like this &#8220;radiation reducing&#8221; E-wave phone chip.


Omega, a Belgian health products company that usually markets things like suntan lotion and wart treatments, is branching out into protective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/cellphoneradiation.jpg" class="left"/> Mobile Phone radiation is spawning worries that it can do everything from <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/bad_news_mobile_phones_make_your_sperm_stupid-2.html">making sperm stupid</a> to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_mobile_phone_popcorn_video_is_viral_marketing_for_bluetooth_headset_-2.html">popping popcorn</a>&#8230; which means it&#8217;s prime time to start selling &#8220;cures&#8221; like this &#8220;radiation reducing&#8221; E-wave phone chip.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: cellphone radiation, belgium, cellphone accessories, cellphones, health gadget, health scare, mobile phones, omega, phones, radiation --><br />
<span id="more-318456"></span>
<p>Omega, a Belgian health products company that usually markets things like suntan lotion and wart treatments, is branching out into protective tech gadgets. It&#8217;s E-wave chip, which attaches onto phones, allegedly offsets electromagnetic radiation and neutralizes the &#8220;heating effect&#8221; caused by electromagnetic signals. All tests to prove these claims seem to have been done by Omega itself.</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;ve run out of tin foil hats, this little device is now out in Belgium for $US50. It&#8217;ll be rolled out to the rest of the mobile phone radiation fearing world in 2009. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE4B84ME20081209?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=scienceNews">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ewave_chip_protects_against_scary_if_not_scientifically_proven_threat_of_mobile_phone_radiation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
