<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; radeon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/radeon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Raw. Power. Aurora ALX Benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/raw-power-aurora-alx-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/raw-power-aurora-alx-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Oaten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gamers, could you handle this? An Aurora ALX with a Core i7 975 processor, X58 microATX motherboard and two ATI Radeon HD 5870&#8217;s in CrossFire. Is it fast? Pfft. Whaddyareckon?
Over at Hot Hardware, the reviewers of this Alienware dream machine are pretty clear about it.
It&#8217;s easy to see from the graphs that the parts used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Screeniealien.jpg" alt="Screeniealien" title="Screeniealien" width="423" height="418" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-356248" />Gamers, could you handle this? An Aurora ALX with a Core i7 975 processor, X58 microATX motherboard and two ATI Radeon HD 5870&#8217;s in CrossFire. Is it fast? Pfft. Whaddyareckon?<span id="more-356247"></span></p>
<p>Over at <a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Alienware-Aurora/">Hot Hardware</a>, the reviewers of this Alienware dream machine are pretty clear about it.</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s easy to see from the graphs that the parts used in this system are high-performance in every way. If money is no object, you can&#8217;t buy a faster platform than the Intel Core i7 975 with an X58 chipset motherboard.</p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s one of those graphs.<br />
<img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Graphscreenie.jpg" alt="Graphscreenie" title="Graphscreenie" width="553" height="587" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-356249" /></p>
<p>Basically, we&#8217;re talking about the meanest gaming rig on the market. Or at least, that&#8217;s how Hot Hardware sees it, and there&#8217;s not much room for debating their findings. But it&#8217;ll cost you plenty. $US4074.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Alienware-Aurora/">Hot Hardware</a>] via [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/4-000-alienware-aurora-alx-benchmarked-domination-this-world-h/">Egadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/raw-power-aurora-alx-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Current State Of Graphics Cards, In A Photo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-current-state-of-graphics-cards-in-a-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-current-state-of-graphics-cards-in-a-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4890]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi r4890]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi r4890 cyclone soc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confusing, meaningless name? Check. Ostentatious styling added by a third party, completely unsuited for a component that you often can&#8217;t see? Check. Bizarre, irrelevant marketing claims? Oh, check.
The MSI R4890 Cyclone SOC, which shares as much aesthetically with a motorcycle engine as it does a PC component, is a perfect example of everything that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_r4890.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Confusing, meaningless name? Check. Ostentatious styling added by a third party, completely unsuited for a component that you often can&#8217;t see? Check. Bizarre, irrelevant marketing claims? Oh, check.<span id="more-341424"></span></p>
<p>The MSI R4890 Cyclone SOC, which shares as much aesthetically with a motorcycle engine as it does a PC component, is a perfect example of everything that is <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/giz-explains-how-to-choose-the-right-graphics-card/">confusing, irritating and unnecessarily obfuscated</a> with graphics cards today.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of impressive tech here&mdash;an overclocked 1GHz ATI Radeon HD 4890 GPU and 1GB of GDDR5 RAM&mdash; but instead of putting that into meaningful terms, MSI is content to just throw the numbers out there and brag about the card&#8217;s &#8220;200-year lifespan&#8221; and &#8220;largest ever&#8221; fan. I&#8217;m sure this is fun for the hardest of the hardcore enthusiasts, but for the rest of us it&#8217;s just a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/giz-explains-how-to-choose-the-right-graphics-card/">headache</a>. The card should ship any day now, priced somewhere in the ballpark of $US250. [<a href="http://www.guru3d.com/news/msi-r4890-cyclone-soc-launched/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-current-state-of-graphics-cards-in-a-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Glorious, Hulking History of 3D Graphics</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_glorious_hulking_history_of_3d_graphics-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_glorious_hulking_history_of_3d_graphics-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voodoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_glorious_hulking_history_of_3d_graphics-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Voodoo1 in 1996 to the wallet-and-pixel crushing Nvidia GeForce GTX 285, Maximum PC recounts the entire history of 3D graphics in ultra-gory detail. A fantastically nerdy way to kill 30 minutes. [Maximum PC]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/graphicscards.jpg" alt="" />From the Voodoo1 in 1996 to the wallet-and-pixel crushing Nvidia GeForce GTX 285, Maximum PC recounts the <em>entire history</em> of 3D graphics in ultra-gory detail. A fantastically nerdy way to kill 30 minutes. [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/graphics_extravaganza_ultimate_gpu_retrospective">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: nerd history, 3dfx, at, gaming, geforce, graphics cards, nvidia, pc, pcs, radeon, voodoo --><br />
<span id="more-336089"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_glorious_hulking_history_of_3d_graphics-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giz Explains: GPGPU Computing, and Why It&#8217;ll Melt Your Face Off</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/giz_explains_gpgpu_computing_and_why_itll_melt_your_face_off-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/giz_explains_gpgpu_computing_and_why_itll_melt_your_face_off-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpgpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/giz_explains_gpgpu_computing_and_why_itll_melt_your_face_off-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
No, I didn&#8217;t stutter: GPGPU&#8212;general-purpose computing on graphics processor units&#8212;is what&#8217;s going to bring hot screaming gaming GPUs to the mainstream, with Windows 7 and Snow Leopard. Finally, everbody&#8217;s face melts! Here&#8217;s how.


What a Difference a Letter Makes GPU sounds&#8212;and looks&#8212;a lot like CPU, but they&#8217;re pretty different, and not just &#8217;cause dedicated GPUs like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/GPGPU-speed.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>No, I didn&#8217;t stutter: GPGPU&mdash;general-purpose computing on graphics processor units&mdash;is what&#8217;s going to bring hot screaming gaming GPUs to the mainstream, with Windows 7 and Snow Leopard. Finally, everbody&#8217;s face melts! Here&#8217;s how.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: giz explains, amd, ati, cpu, feature, geforce, gpgpu, gpu, graphics cards, intel, larrabee, nvidia, parallel, parallel processing, radeon, serial, snow leopard, top, windows 7 --><br />
<span id="more-335833"></span>
<p><strong>What a Difference a Letter Makes</strong><br /> GPU sounds&mdash;and looks&mdash;a lot like CPU, but they&#8217;re pretty different, and not just &#8217;cause dedicated GPUs like the Radeon HD 4870 here can be massive. GPU stands for graphics processing unit, while CPU stands for central processing unit. Spelled out, you can already see the big differences between the two, but it takes some experts from Nvidia and AMD/ATI to get to the heart of what makes them so distinct.</p>
<p>Traditionally, a GPU does basically one thing, speed up the processing of image data that you end up seeing on your screen. As AMD Stream Computing Director Patricia Harrell told me, they&#8217;re essentially chains of special purpose hardware designed to accelerate each stage of the geometry pipeline, the process of matching image data or a computer model to the pixels on your screen.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/radeon.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>GPUs <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gpu">have a pretty long history</a>&mdash;you could go all the way back to the Commodore Amiga, if you wanted to&mdash;but we&#8217;re going to stick to the fairly present. That is, the last 10 years, when Nvidia&#8217;s Sanford Russell says GPUs starting adding cores to distribute the workload across multiple cores. See, graphics calculations&mdash;the calculations needed to figure out what pixels to display your screen as you snipe someone&#8217;s head off in Team Fortress 2&mdash;are particularly suited to being handled in parallel.</p>
<p>An example Nvidia&#8217;s Russell gave to think about the difference between a traditional CPU and a GPU is this: If you were looking for a word in a book, and handed the task to a CPU, it would start at page 1 and read it all the way to the end, because it&#8217;s a &#8220;serial&#8221; processor. It would be fast, but would take time because it has to go in order. A GPU, which is a &#8220;parallel&#8221; processor, &#8220;would tear [the book] into a thousand pieces&#8221; and read it all at the same time. Even if each individual word is read more slowly, the book may be read in its entirety quicker, because words are read simultaneously.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/telsadiagram.jpg" alt="" />All those cores in a GPU&mdash;<a href="http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonhd4800/specs3.html">800 stream processors in ATI&#8217;s Radeon 4870</a>&mdash;make it really good at performing the same calculation over and over on a whole bunch of data. (Hence a common GPU spec is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flops">flops, or floating point operations per second</a>, measured in current hardware in terms of gigaflops and teraflops.) The general-purpose CPU is better at some stuff though, as AMD&#8217;s Harrell said: general programming, accessing memory randomly, executing steps in order, everyday stuff. It&#8217;s true, though, that CPUs are sprouting cores, looking more and more like GPUs in some respects, as <a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2009/01/intels_barrett_on_paranoia_the_core_craze_and_the_end_of_gigahertz-2.html">retiring Intel Chairman Craig Barrett told me</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Explosions Are Cool, But Where&#8217;s the General Part?</strong><br /> Okay, so the thing about parallel processing&mdash;using tons of cores to break stuff up and crunch it all at once&mdash;is that applications have to be programmed to take advantage of it. It&#8217;s not easy, which is why Intel at this point hires more software engineers than hardware ones. So even if the hardware&#8217;s there, you still need the software to get there, and it&#8217;s a whole different kind of programming.</p>
<p>Which brings us to OpenCL (Open Computing Language) and, to a lesser extent, CUDA. They&#8217;re frameworks that make it way easier to use graphics cards for kinds of computing that aren&#8217;t related to making zombie guts fly in Left 4 Dead. <a href="http://www.khronos.org/opencl/">OpenCL is</a> the &#8220;open standard for parallel programming of heterogeneous systems&#8221; standardised by the Khronos Group&mdash;AMD, Apple, IBM, Intel, Nvidia, Samsung and a bunch of others are involved, so it&#8217;s pretty much an industry-wide thing. In semi-English, it&#8217;s a cross-platform standard for parallel programming across different kinds of hardware&mdash;using both CPU and GPU&mdash;that anyone can use for free. CUDA is <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home.html#">Nvidia&#8217;s own architecture</a> for parallel programming on its graphics cards.</p>
<p>OpenCL <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/snow_leopard_revealed_multicore_optimised_gpu_lovin_os_upgrade_due_in_one_year-2.html">is a big part of Snow Leopard</a>. Windows 7 will use some graphics card acceleration too (though we&#8217;re really <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opengl-directx,2019.html">looking forward to DirectX 11</a>). So graphics card acceleration is going to be a big part of future OSes.</p>
<p><strong>So Uh, What&#8217;s It Going to Do for Me?</strong><br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/nvidiascience.jpg" alt="" />Parallel processing is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/breaking-ps3-folding-ps3-triples-folding-at-homes-computing-power-to-over-500-tflopspflops-in-spitting-range-246664.php">pretty great for scientists</a>. But what about those regular people? Does it make their stuff go faster. Not everything, and to start, it&#8217;s not going too far from graphics, since that&#8217;s still the easiest to parallelize. But converting, decoding and creating videos&mdash;stuff you&#8217;re probably using now more than you did a couple years ago&mdash;will improve dramatically soon. Say bye-bye 20-minute renders. Ditto for image editing; there&#8217;ll be less waiting for effects to propagate with giant images (Photoshop CS4 already uses GPU acceleration). In gaming, beyond straight-up graphical improvements, physics engines can get more complicated and realistic.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re just Twittering or checking email, no, GPGPU computing is not going to melt your stone-cold face. But anyone with anything cool on their computer is going to feel the melt eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/giz_explains_gpgpu_computing_and_why_itll_melt_your_face_off-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factory-Overclocked ATI Radeon HD 4890 Is First 1GHz Graphics Card</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/factoryoverclocked_ati_radeon_hd_4890_is_first_1ghz_graphics_card-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/factoryoverclocked_ati_radeon_hd_4890_is_first_1ghz_graphics_card-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/factoryoverclocked_ati_radeon_hd_4890_is_first_1ghz_graphics_card-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
At 1GHz, the ATI Radeon HD 4890 is the fastest-clocked graphics card in the planet&#8212;a world&#8217;s first. It&#8217;s not a new chip, however, just a &#8220;factory-overclocked&#8221; air-cooled 4890 that looks like a Ferrari.



So that&#8217;s a bit of a cheat: In theory, you can buy the 850MHz version and overclock it yourself without paying the premium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1242229036716_radeon-hd-4890-stock-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>At 1GHz, the ATI Radeon HD 4890 is the fastest-clocked graphics card in the planet&mdash;a world&#8217;s first. It&#8217;s not a new chip, however, just a &#8220;factory-overclocked&#8221; air-cooled 4890 that looks like a Ferrari.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: graphics, 4890, amd, ati, ati radeon hd 4890, hd, radeon --><br />
<span id="more-335829"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1242229033962_radeon-hd-4890-stock-2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>So that&#8217;s a bit of a cheat: In theory, you can buy the 850MHz version and overclock it yourself without paying the premium for the 1GHz version. Or maybe you can buy the factory-overclocked 1GHz version and overclock it <i>again</i> so your PC melts and reaches the Earth&#8217;s core. [<a href="http://hothardware.com/News/AMD-Breaks-1GHz-GPU-Barrier-With-Radeon-HD-4890/">Hot Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/factoryoverclocked_ati_radeon_hd_4890_is_first_1ghz_graphics_card-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujitsu Amilo GraphicBooster External GPU Actually Looks Like a Great Idea</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/fujitsu_amilo_graphicbooster_external_gpu_actually_looks_like_a_great_idea-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/fujitsu_amilo_graphicbooster_external_gpu_actually_looks_like_a_great_idea-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/fujitsu_amilo_graphicbooster_external_gpu_actually_looks_like_a_great_idea-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fujistu-Siemens has released their Amilo GraphicBooster. It seems like a rather good idea. A powerful graphics card and two-USB port that you can have permanently attached to three displays. It look amazing in action.



The Amilo GraphicBooster connects to the laptop using PCI-E, and has its own power supply. It houses a 512MB ATI Radeon HD3870 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/Amilo-GraphicBooster-05.jpg" class="left" />Fujistu-Siemens has released their <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/fujitsus_amilo_graphicbooster_external_graphics_card_for_easy_laptop_upgrades-2.html">Amilo GraphicBooster</a>. It seems like a rather good idea. A powerful graphics card and two-USB port that you can have permanently attached to three displays. It look amazing in action.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: notebooks, ati, ati radeon hd 3870, displays, fujitsu, fujitsu amilo graphicbooster, fujitsu-siemens, gpu, peripherals --><br />
<span id="more-317654"></span>
<p><object width="494" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TUm33Rre97g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TUm33Rre97g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="400"></embed></object></p>
<p>The Amilo GraphicBooster connects to the laptop using PCI-E, and has its own power supply. It houses a 512MB ATI Radeon HD3870 capable of driving three displays simultaneously, with two USB ports added so you can have a mouse and a keyboard always connected for minimun fuss.</p>
<p>And on top of that, it looks nice.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">galleryPost('fujigpu', 3, '');</script></p>
<p>We will have to wait and see if we can say the same about its price. [<a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2008/12/fujitsusiemens_amilo_graphicbooster_external_laptop_gpu_released.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/fujitsu_amilo_graphicbooster_external_gpu_actually_looks_like_a_great_idea-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Ready for Cheap Nvidia Graphics Cards</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/get_ready_for_cheap_nvidia_graphics_cards-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/get_ready_for_cheap_nvidia_graphics_cards-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/get_ready_for_cheap_nvidia_graphics_cards-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATI has been hitting Nvidia hard with its 4000-series big guns like the Radeon HD 4870 X2, and they&#8217;re starting to feel it, with ATI successfully clawing away marketshare from Nvidia. Which has Nvidia skurred. So, sources say, Nvidia&#8217;s readying a barrage of price cuts to keep the territory loss to a minimum. If it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/gtx280cheap.jpg" style="display:block;" />ATI has been hitting Nvidia hard with its 4000-series big guns like <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/fastest_graphics_card_alive_ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_gets_official_tomorrow.html">the Radeon HD 4870 X2</a>, and they&#8217;re starting to feel it, with ATI successfully clawing away marketshare from Nvidia. Which has Nvidia skurred. So, sources say, Nvidia&#8217;s readying a barrage of price cuts to keep the territory loss to a minimum. If it pans out, we should be in for some sweet deals&mdash;last time Nvidia played hard ball with ATI, they threw bricks, cutting their top-end graphics cards <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/topend_nvidia_geforce_gtx_280_260_graphics_cards_get_huge_price_cut-2.html">by $US200 just a month out the gate</a>, and let loose its <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/midrange_graphics_card_showdown_nvidia_9800_gtx_slides_past_ati_radeon_hd_4850-2.html">GeForce 9800 GTX</a> for around $US200 as well. It could be a Merry Christmas after all. [<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20081114PD208.html">Digitimes</a> via <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/topend_nvidia_geforce_gtx_280_260_graphics_cards_get_huge_price_cut-2.html">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: hopefully, amd, dealzmodo?, geforce, graphics cards, nvidia, radeon --><span id="more-315229"></span>
<p>[<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/rumor_nvidia_spooked_amds_market_share_gains_will_cut_videocard_prices_response">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/get_ready_for_cheap_nvidia_graphics_cards-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asetek Quickest With Cooling for ATI&#8217;s Most Powerful Graphics Card 4870 X2</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/asetek_quickest_with_cooling_for_atis_most_powerful_graphics_card_4870_x2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/asetek_quickest_with_cooling_for_atis_most_powerful_graphics_card_4870_x2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kit Eaton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asetek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/asetek_quickest_with_cooling_for_atis_most_powerful_graphics_card_4870_x2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just on Monday we were talking about ATI&#8217;s monster new 4870 X2 graphics, perhaps the most powerful around, and already Asetek have come up with a liquid cooling system for it. The LCLC is designed to either let you run the card nearly silent (the heat exchanger fan on the cooler runs at just 30 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/asetek_amd_r700.jpg" class="left"/>Just on <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/fastest_graphics_card_alive_ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_gets_official_tomorrow.html">Monday</a> we were talking about ATI&#8217;s monster new 4870 X2 graphics, perhaps the most powerful around, and already Asetek have come up with a liquid cooling system for it. The LCLC is designed to either let you run the card nearly silent (the heat exchanger fan on the cooler runs at just 30 dB(A), which is pretty quiet) or overclock the ATI board for even more extreme performance. Either way, it&#8217;s capable of lowering the GPU temp by 28 degrees, and takes up only two more slots. Price and release date not available, but read on for the press release.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: cooling, 4870 x2, asetek, ati, card, gadgets, gpu, graphics, lclc, liquid cooling, radeon --><span id="more-301665"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p> SAN JOSE, Calf. August 12, 2008 &#8211; Asetek&#8217;s industry-leading, LCLC liquid cooling solution is now available for AMD&#8217;s much anticipated multi-GPU cards, the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 family of graphics cards (codenamed R700). The unique, liquid cooling approach is exactly what OEMs need to extract the highest performance from the graphics card and produce top-of-the-line gaming and entertainment products.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are Heat is an &#8216;age-old&#8217; problem for computers. However, what once used to be a concern primarily for cutting-edge systems has now become an issue for everyone,&#8221; says Gary Baum, Asetek&#8217;s Senior VP of Marketing. &#8220;OEMs developing high-performance, low-noise systems require a safe thermal management solution that not only keeps their systems cool, but is easy to install, maintenance free, and most important, is virtually noise free,&#8221;</p>
<p>Baum continues: &#8220;The days of computers that sound like jet aircraft taking off are over. Our award-winning, LCLC provides worry-free, aggressive thermal management for advanced gaming and graphics-intensive applications&#8211;especially those using multiple GPUs like AMD&#8217;s latest R700-based graphics cards.&#8221;</p>
<p>When used as part of a Radeon HD 4870 X2 Crossfire configuration, the LCLC product consumes only two of the four slots normally used, freeing up two slots for other configuration upgrades. End users now have additional configuration flexibility.</p>
<p>Tests indicate that Asetek&#8217;s highly integrated, liquid cooling solution lowers the GPU temperatures found on the 4870 X2 by as much as 28 degrees. This enables the cards to have optimum overclocking potential for the extreme applications, but to also run completely silent. Only the system heat exchanger fan that typically runs at a very quiet 30 dB(A)&#8211;equivalent to a loud whisper&#8211;can be heard.</p>
<p>Asetek is the only liquid cooling company whose rigorous shock, vibration, and thermal stress testing assures a 50,000-hour operational lifetime with absolutely no end-user maintenance required </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/asetek_quickest_with_cooling_for_atis_most_powerful_graphics_card_4870_x2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fastest Graphics Card Alive ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Gets Official Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/fastest_graphics_card_alive_ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_gets_official_tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/fastest_graphics_card_alive_ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_gets_official_tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siggraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/fastest_graphics_card_alive_ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_gets_official_tomorrow.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATI&#8217;s Nvidia-slaying Radeon HD 4870 X2, previewed last month, will get official tomorrow at SIGGRAPH says the WSJ, who notes that some reviewers are calling it the most powerful card around. It&#8217;s an interesting test of ATI&#8217;s graphics card strategy: Cheaper, less power-hungry GPUs that can be easily strapped together (like the dual-GPU 4870 X2) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/radeonhd4870x2.jpg" class="left"/>ATI&#8217;s Nvidia-slaying Radeon HD 4870 X2, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_previewed_atis_fastest_single_graphics_card_ever-2.html">previewed last month</a>, will get official tomorrow at SIGGRAPH says the WSJ, who notes that some reviewers are calling it the most powerful card around. It&#8217;s an interesting test of ATI&#8217;s graphics card strategy: Cheaper, less power-hungry GPUs that can be easily strapped together (like the dual-GPU 4870 X2) versus Nvidia&#8217;s penchant for <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_nvidia_geforce_gtx_200_graphics_cards_makes_your_gaming_rig_officially_outdated_-2.html">obscenely powerful single GPUs</a>. The best part? Whoever you go with, you <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/topend_nvidia_geforce_gtx_280_260_graphics_cards_get_huge_price_cut-2.html">can&#8217;t really go wrong</a> anymore. [<a href="</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: ati, ati radeon hd 4870 x2, graphics cards, radeon, radeon hd 4870 x2, siggraph, siggraph 2008 --><span id="more-301435"></span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/fastest_graphics_card_alive_ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_gets_official_tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Previewed: ATI&#8217;s Fastest Single Graphics Card Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_previewed_atis_fastest_single_graphics_card_ever-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_previewed_atis_fastest_single_graphics_card_ever-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_previewed_atis_fastest_single_graphics_card_ever-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATI fanboys, your time may have come with the R700-based Radeon HD 4870 X2. It&#8217;s a US$500 multi-GPU card that basically straps together a pair of Radeon HD 4870s with 2GB of onboard memory to create ATI&#8217;s fastest single card ever. (It&#8217;s not your imagination, they&#8217;re really stepping with the Nvidia-killing, which is sweet.) Benchwise, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/radeonhd4870x2.jpg" class="left"/>ATI fanboys, your time may have come with the R700-based Radeon HD 4870 X2. It&#8217;s a US$500 multi-GPU card that basically straps together a pair of Radeon HD 4870s with 2GB of onboard memory to create ATI&#8217;s fastest single card ever. (It&#8217;s not your imagination, they&#8217;re really <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/atis_nvidia_geforce_gtx_280killer_is_watercooled_superpowered-2.html">stepping with the Nvidia-killing</a>, which <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/topend_nvidia_geforce_gtx_280_260_graphics_cards_get_huge_price_cut-2.html">is sweet</a>.) <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3354&#038;p=1">Benchwise</a>, it actually beats Nvidia&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_nvidia_geforce_gtx_200_graphics_cards_makes_your_gaming_rig_officially_outdated_-2.html">monster GeForce GTX 280</a> running in SLI in a couple of games, like Age of Conan.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: ati, amd, ati radeon hd 4870 x2, gaming, graphics, pcs, r700, radeon, radeon hd 4870 x2, rv770 --><br />
<span id="more-297862"></span>
<p>One of the most fundamental changes in the R700 cards&#8211;which are two RV770s with a PCI Express switch connecting the the two and double the memory&#8211;is that the GPUs actually communicate with each other, whereas past CrossFire configs had both cards basically rendering their own sections independently, then combining them. AnandTech says it&#8217;s not entirely clear how much communication there will be, but there will definitely be more than there was. Also, the drivers still need to come up to spec to let the card truly shine, but the hardware is totally in the right place. [<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3354">AnandTech</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/ati_radeon_hd_4870_x2_previewed_atis_fastest_single_graphics_card_ever-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
