<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; princeton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/princeton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Real Mouse Navigates Quake 2 Using A Trackball</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/real-mouse-navigates-quake-2-using-a-trackball/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/real-mouse-navigates-quake-2-using-a-trackball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mazes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quake 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neuroscientists at Princeton created a new way to study the neurons of the classic mouse-in-a-maze: Strap it to a suspended ball and have it run through a virtual maze. That first virtual maze? Derived from a Quake 2 level.

Apparently it&#8217;s difficult to control and study the neurons of a mouse when it&#8217;s physically moving, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neuroscientists at Princeton created a new way to study the neurons of the classic mouse-in-a-maze: Strap it to a suspended ball and have it run through a virtual maze. That first virtual maze? Derived from a <em>Quake 2</em> level.<span id="more-360356"></span></p>
<p><object width="500" height="308"><Center><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1DJOTEDBA2c&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1DJOTEDBA2c&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308"></object></p>
<p>Apparently it&#8217;s difficult to control and study the neurons of a mouse when it&#8217;s physically moving, and this method makes that easier. The ball is suspended on a jet of air, and the mouse is strapped in place with a collar on top of it (like a giant trackball, sort of). Given that I don&#8217;t understand psychology at all, or even totally know what a neuron is, I&#8217;m going to go ahead and assume that this is an elaborate ruse to get a mouse to play <em>Quake 2</em>. Well played, scientists. [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-10/mouse-scampers-giant-trackball-plays-quake">Pop Sci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/real-mouse-navigates-quake-2-using-a-trackball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Princeton Students Hate The Kindle DX</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/princeton-students-hate-the-kindle-dx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/princeton-students-hate-the-kindle-dx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle dx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle pilot program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[textbooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad news for Amazon, who&#8217;s hoping that in the future all college students will read their textbooks through the oversized Kindle DX: the first students to use it, at Princeton, are not fans.
Students taking part in the pilot program have all sorts of complaints about the device, mostly centering around the fact that it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/kindledx.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_kindledx.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Bad news for Amazon, who&#8217;s hoping that in the future all college students will read their textbooks through the oversized Kindle DX: the first students to use it, at Princeton, are not fans.<span id="more-357005"></span></p>
<p>Students taking part in the pilot program have all sorts of complaints about the device, mostly centering around the fact that it&#8217;s a huge pain to take notes and &#8220;interact&#8221; with the text. Here&#8217;s what student Aaron Horvath has to say about it:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;I hate to sound like a Luddite, but this technology is a poor excuse of an academic tool. It&#8217;s clunky, slow and a real pain to operate. Much of my learning comes from a physical interaction with the text: bookmarks, highlights, page-tearing, sticky notes and other marks representing the importance of certain passages &#8211; not to mention margin notes, where most of my paper ideas come from and interaction with the material occurs. All these things have been lost, and if not lost they&#8217;re too slow to keep up with my thinking, and the ‘features&#8217; have been rendered useless.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Yee-ouch! Further complaints include the fact that the lack of concrete page numbers make citing sources a huge pain in the arse and the fact that you need to charge up the battery for it to work. I guess physical textbooks will be around for a while longer, eh? [<a href="http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/09/28/23918/">Daily Princetonian</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/kindle-dx-called-poor-excuse-of-an-academic-tool-in-princeton/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/princeton-students-hate-the-kindle-dx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Encryption Easily Broken Using Keys Hiding In RAM</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/data_encryption_easily_broken_using_keys_hiding_in_ram-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/data_encryption_easily_broken_using_keys_hiding_in_ram-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/data_encryption_easily_broken_using_keys_hiding_in_ram-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists at Princeton have discovered a way to grab otherwise-protected data encryption keys from memory on a computer that&#8217;s just been powered down. This is pretty scary stuff, since the keys&#8212;which are well protected when the computer is on&#8212;are the one thing that keeps super-tight encryption from cracking. 


It was previously thought that data held [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Hamburglar_RAM.jpg" class="left"/>Scientists at Princeton have discovered a way to grab otherwise-protected data encryption keys from memory on a computer that&#8217;s just been powered down. This is pretty scary stuff, since the keys&mdash;which are well protected when the computer is on&mdash;are the one thing that keeps super-tight encryption from cracking. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: data, edward felten, encryption, encryption key, laptops, memory, princeton, ram, security, volatile memory --><br />
<span id="more-280239"></span><br />
<blockquote>It was previously thought that data held in so-called &#8220;volatile memory&#8221; was only retained for a few seconds after the machine was switched off. But the team found that data including encryption keys could be held and retrieved for up to several minutes.</p></blockquote>
<p>The best access, it seems, comes when the burglar powers down a hibernating laptop. If he throws it in a freezer first, he&#8217;ll get even better results: &#8220;A laptop cooled to about -50ºC will keep information in its memory for 10 minutes or more.&#8221;
<p>There&#8217;s a simple defense. If you shut down your laptop and let it sit for several minutes before going into a dangerous environ, there is little chance that the keys would be recovered from volatile memory. But seriously, when was the last time anyone shut down their laptop completely? [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7275407.stm">BBC News</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/data_encryption_easily_broken_using_keys_hiding_in_ram-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: The Secret Sauce That Goes Into an OLED High Def TV</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/exclusive_the_secret_sauce_tha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/exclusive_the_secret_sauce_tha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/exclusive_the_secret_sauce_tha.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[newVideoPlayer("oledfac3_gawker.flv", 475, 286);
UDC is one of a handful of companies pioneering OLED development and manufacturing techniques for the big boys such as Samsung, Sony, LG and of course, the US Department of Defense. No one&#8217;s written about how they make these displays, panels that&#8217;ll make up our next generation of super-slim HDTVs, until now. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript">newVideoPlayer("oledfac3_gawker.flv", 475, 286);</script></p>
<p>UDC is one of a handful of companies pioneering OLED development and manufacturing techniques for the big boys such as Samsung, Sony, LG and of course, the US Department of Defense. No one&#8217;s written about how they make these displays, panels that&#8217;ll make up our next generation of super-slim HDTVs, until now. This week, Benny and I visited Universal Display Corporation&#8217;s headquarters in Princeton, NJ for an exclusive tour of the factory, where we witnessed just how they make &#8216;em. <span id="more-257530"></span>We gowned up, donned stylish hairnets and observed OLED panel fabrication up close, a process that involves expensive super-heated dope and something called a shadow mask. (Sounds like fairly nice evening in Vegas, doesn&#8217;t it?)</p>
<p>OLEDs (organic light-emitting diodes) differ from LCDs in that they don&#8217;t need a backlight of any kind, because each pixel is made of a phosphorescent particle that lights up on its own when excited. The trick is getting the particles onto the glass, plastic or metallic screen &#8211; the substrate, they call it &#8211; in an orderly fashion. There are a few techniques, but here&#8217;s the basic process:</p>
<p>1. The phosphorescent coloured particles, or &#8220;dope,&#8221; are prepared. The three colours, red, green and blue, are actually made from powders that are red, yellow and orange. To this day no one is certain why. The powder is carried in vials to the fabrication room.</p>
<p>2. Meanwhile, in a Class 100 clean room (shown in video and gallery under UV protective yellow-tinted glass), the substrate is prepared to be fused with the particles. I think I saw a salad bar in the back, but our guide, Janice Mahon, VP of Technology Commercialisation, only laughed knowingly. Intel has Class 10 clean rooms, btw, but Jesus says his mum&#8217;s house is even cleaner than that.</p>
<p>3. Here&#8217;s where the magic happens: dope meets substrate in a sticky act of love. In the big business of OLEDs these days there are four ways to make this happen:</p>
<p>&bull; <b>Vacuum Thermal Evaporation</b> &#8211; This is UDC&#8217;s tried and true technique, a hot and steamy method involving super-heated dope that evaporates up into a grid, known as the shadow mask, that is placed over the substrate. First the red particles are evaporated, then the grid is shifted ever so slightly, then green is evaporated, then a final shift for blue. In the end, the panel has RGB pixels evenly distributed across the whole thing. Since you have to hang the shadow mask up under the substrate, there&#8217;s a chance it could sag on larger screens, so VTE is aimed at smaller screens.</p>
<p>&bull; <b>Organic Vapor Phase Deposition</b> &#8211; This is where the vapour is heated up then streamed into a system of &#8220;showerheads&#8221; that deposit the particles on a cooled substrate.</p>
<p>&bull; <b>Ink-Jet Printing</b> &#8211; If the dope can be mixed into liquid form, it can run through technology similar to the stuff inside your printer. Precise depositing of dots on a substrate is easy, but the challenges are turning the dope into a liquid and then depositing the right amount in little wells on the substrate where they can dry.</p>
<p>&bull; <b>Organic Vapor Jet Printing</b> &#8211; It&#8217;s what it sounds like, a printing technique that lets you shoot particles through a printhead and straight onto the substrate. The benefit of this is that you don&#8217;t have to turn the stuff into a liquid first, and you don&#8217;t have to worry about getting the particles to dry later. But it&#8217;s still really really hard.<img alt="Benny_and_the_OLEDs.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/Benny_and_the_OLEDs.jpg" width="463" height="334" class="center"/>Glass is the easiest thing to use to make OLEDs, because it is rigid and because it is not porous: moisture and oxygen can&#8217;t get in and ruin the little glowing organic molecules. Plastic is the worst, because it is easily penetrated. Metal foil is a middle ground, because the metal side keeps the molecules secure, but the glowing side still needs a special coating, and won&#8217;t last as long as a glass OLED.</p>
<p>Like phosphors in a plasma TV, OLED materials fade over their lifetime, even when tightly sealed. At this point, red and green last hundreds of thousands of hours, so they could easily last as long as other technologies. But blue is still an issue. In any situation, it&#8217;s going to be the first to go, though some OLED panels are now being rated in the 50,000-hour range.</p>
<p>Next up for UDC is a working flexible screen on metal, hopefully sooner than later. [<a href="http://www.universaldisplay.com/">UDC</a>]</p>
<p><i>&ndash;Video was shot and edited by the multitalented Benny Goldman; I took the photos.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/exclusive_the_secret_sauce_tha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny Bluetooth Adapter is Mostly USB, Smallest Ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/tiny_bluetooth_adapter_is_most/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/tiny_bluetooth_adapter_is_most/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adapters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/tiny_bluetooth_adapter_is_most.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Princeton Bluetooth adapter is probably the smallest USB adapter we&#8217;ve seen yet, being made of mostly a USB tip and a tiny little body. The USB adapter works on both PCs and Macs, has Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR, and sticks out only a tiny bit so you don&#8217;t accidentally snap it off. If our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="princetonbt.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/princetonbt.png" width="303" height="308" class="left"/>This Princeton Bluetooth adapter is probably the smallest USB adapter we&#8217;ve seen yet, being made of mostly a USB tip and a tiny little body. The USB adapter works on both PCs and Macs, has Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR, and sticks out only a tiny bit so you don&#8217;t accidentally snap it off. If our laptops didn&#8217;t already have Bluetooth, we&#8217;d be on this faster than Big Daddys on Little Sisters. [<a href="http://www.princeton.co.jp/product/mobile/ptmubt3s.html">Princeton</a>]<span id="more-251187"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/tiny_bluetooth_adapter_is_most/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Princeton Cuby gives the iPod Shuffle a Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/princeton_cuby_gives_the_ipod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/princeton_cuby_gives_the_ipod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/princeton_cuby_gives_the_ipod.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Cuby is rather a chic little dock from Princeton Japan for your Second-Gen Shuffle. Compact and bijou, you can power it up via USB or with 3 AA batteries. Measuring 49 x 49x 59 mm and weighing 95 grams, it delivers sound from its 0.5W x 2Ch speakers and you can get it for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="prince_1-thumb.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/prince_1-thumb.jpg" width="450" height="337" /><br />
The Cuby is rather a chic little dock from Princeton Japan for your Second-Gen Shuffle. Compact and bijou, you can power it up via USB or with 3 AA batteries. Measuring 49 x 49x 59 mm and weighing 95 grams, it delivers sound from its 0.5W x 2Ch speakers and you can get it for $33 in Japan. See it undressed below.<span id="more-248177"></span><img alt="prince_6.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/prince_6.jpg" width="450" height="497" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/princeton_cuby_ipod_shuffle_dock.php">Princeton Cuby iPod Shuffle dock</a> [New Launches]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/princeton_cuby_gives_the_ipod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
