<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Future Of Sex Is Torrenting Yourself</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-future-of-sex-is-torrenting-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-future-of-sex-is-torrenting-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transhumanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the rapid advancements in technology and science, in artificial-intelligence and genetics, leading us to a moment in time&#8212;a technological singularity—where ultraintelligent machines improve on their own designs, while we humans are free to edit our own evolution?
Transhumanists believe so, and contemplate how technology might be used to enhance our mental and physical capacities.
H+ Magazine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DemolitionMan.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DemolitionMan.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Are the rapid advancements in technology and science, in artificial-intelligence and genetics, leading us to a moment in time&mdash;a technological <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity">singularity</a>—where ultraintelligent machines improve on their own designs, while we humans are free to edit our own evolution?<span id="more-353932"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism">Transhumanists</a> believe so, and contemplate how technology might be used to enhance our mental and physical capacities.</p>
<p>H+ Magazine has rounded up some leading minds, and steered their thoughts towards sex. Will it still exist as we know it today?</p>
<blockquote><p> Sex for procreation will be separated from sex for pleasure. Polyamorism will be the norm. After all if &#8220;I&#8221; have uploaded, duplicated myself and exist as self-similar copies in cyberspaces co-existent with realspace, where does the &#8220;self&#8221; end and the &#8220;other&#8221; begin? &mdash;Extropia DaSilva</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p> Exosex, sex outside the biological body, would be simulated in virtuality, much like Second Life or Skype and other digital formats where sex is enhanced, extended, digitized, and synthetic. It would be more real than real &#8211; a hyper-real experience. &mdash;Natasha Vita-More</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Woah. More trippy concepts after the jump. Not exactly safe for work, though. [<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/digitaledition/2009-fall/">H+ Magazine</a> via <a href="http://fleshbot.com/5359881/the-future-of-sex-will-we-still-be-doing-it-in-a-posthuman-world">Fleshbot NSFW</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-future-of-sex-is-torrenting-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Embarrasses Itself with Five Idiotic Predictions for the Future</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM has just released a list of five innovations it thinks we&#8217;ll see in the next five years, and they&#8217;re ridiculous. It&#8217;s the kind of crap we laugh at when we see old Life magazine from the 40&#8217;s predicting airship kitchens by the year 2000.


Here&#8217;s the list:
-Energy saving solar technology printed and stuck onto asphalt, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="399"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/86RpIwNTGvI&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/86RpIwNTGvI&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="399"></embed></object>IBM has just released a list of five innovations it thinks we&#8217;ll see in the next five years, and they&#8217;re ridiculous. It&#8217;s the kind of crap we laugh at when we see <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_kitchen_of_tomorrow_in_1943-2.html">old Life magazine from the 40&#8217;s predicting airship kitchens</a> by the year 2000.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: predictions, clips, future, gadgets, ibm --><br />
<span id="more-317552"></span>
<p>Here&#8217;s the list:</p>
<p>-Energy saving solar technology printed and stuck onto asphalt, paint and windows<br /> -A crystal ball to help you monitor health<br /> -We will talk to the Web, and the Web will talk back<br /> -We will have our own digital shopping assistants<br /> -Forgetting will become a distant memory via smart appliances in every area of the home and office</p>
<p>Seriously, your big prediction for the next five years of technological innovation is <i>talking internet</i>? Are you fucking serious? Every single one of these predictions is laughable and idiotic. Seriously, a touchscreen in a dressing room to help you call someone to get you a different size is not an innovation, nor is it something that we will need to wait five years for. If that was a good idea, we&#8217;d have it now, but it&#8217;s not, so we don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>You would think that a company that exists in the tech sphere would have a clue about the types of short-term advances we can expect. Oh well, better go make some more unfunny ads to run incessantly during football games! [<a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/presskit/26121.wss">IBM</a> via <a href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/12/when-innovation-dies-ibm.html">PSFK</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP Morgan Retracts iPhone Nano Prediction</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/jp_morgan_retracts_iphone_nano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/jp_morgan_retracts_iphone_nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/jp_morgan_retracts_iphone_nano.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only was the iPhone Nano prediction obvious, now they&#8217;re taking it back as &#8220;unlikely anytime soon&#8221;. Told you. [TUAW]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="jpmorgan.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/jpmorgan.jpg" width="424" height="105" class="center" />Not only was the iPhone Nano prediction obvious, now they&#8217;re taking it back as &#8220;unlikely anytime soon&#8221;. <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/apple_applies_for_patent_for_s.html">Told you</a>. [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-now-says-no-to-near-term-nano-iphone/">TUAW</a>]<span id="more-248815"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/jp_morgan_retracts_iphone_nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy Looking Into Bomb-Predicting Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/navy_looking_into_bombpredicti/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/navy_looking_into_bombpredicti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/navy_looking_into_bombpredicti.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Navy isn&#8217;t asking for much: they just want to be able to predict where bombs will be as to avoid, you know, getting blown up by them. Is that so much to ask? They&#8217;re looking for out-of-the-box thinking and new technologies to help in their quest, and they&#8217;ve got a big ol&#8217; barrel of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="war_in_iraq_explosion.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/war_in_iraq_explosion.jpg" class="left" />The Navy isn&#8217;t asking for much: they just want to be able to predict where bombs will be as to avoid, you know, getting blown up by them. Is that so much to ask? They&#8217;re looking for out-of-the-box thinking and new technologies to help in their quest, and they&#8217;ve got a big ol&#8217; barrel of grant money to hand out to anyone with a halfway feasible idea. It should lead to some pretty interesting technologies, hopefully ones that&#8217;ll make people safer. I&#8217;m really hoping they like my proposal to replace the terrorists&#8217; bomb-making supplies with delicious candy. I&#8217;ll keep you guys updated! &#8226; [<a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/07/exclusive-navy-.html">Danger Room</a>]<span id="more-248529"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/navy_looking_into_bombpredicti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock-Predicting Robot to Make More Money Than You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/stockpredicting_robot_to_make/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/stockpredicting_robot_to_make/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/stockpredicting_robot_to_make.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think you suck at playing the stock market now, wait until you have to compete with an army of stock-predicting robots.
Lehman Brothers is working on a &#8220;secret&#8221; AI system that they hope will be able to foresee the future of the markets, making the very rich even richer. We aren&#8217;t just talking about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/johnny5.jpg" alt="johnny5.jpg" mce_src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/johnny5.jpg" class="left" height="348" width="250">If you think you suck at playing the stock market now, wait until you have to compete with an army of stock-predicting robots.</p>
<p>Lehman Brothers is working on a &#8220;secret&#8221; AI system that they hope will be able to foresee the future of the markets, making the very rich even richer. We aren&#8217;t just talking about mergers and acquisitions, either; this bot would take into account the emotions of the traders. You know, emotions like greed and vindictiveness. They&#8217;re hoping it will make trading easier and make the market more stable, but who knows if it&#8217;ll actually work. But hey, here&#8217;s hoping it does, as if there&#8217;s anyone who deserves to catch a break it&#8217;s the folks on Wall Street. You&#8217;re the heroes, guys! Don&#8217;t let anyone tell you otherwise! <span class="byline">â€“Adam Frucci</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/03/business/bxdata.php" mce_href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/03/business/bxdata.php">International Herald Tribune</a> [<a href="http://www.therawfeed.com/2007/05/wall-street-firm-building-secret-stock.html" mce_href="http://www.therawfeed.com/2007/05/wall-street-firm-building-secret-stock.html">The Raw Feed</a>]</p>
<p><span id="more-246232"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/stockpredicting_robot_to_make/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Into the year 2000: future past predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/into_the_year_2000_future_past/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/into_the_year_2000_future_past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/into_the_year_2000_future_past.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I love the future. It&#8217;s always so exciting, and it loves to bite you in the butt when you suggest you know what&#8217;s coming next. Take this list of predictions from 1900, looking at what may come to pass in the hundred years ahead&#8230; a lovely list of hits and misses.
Here&#8217;s a taste:
Prediction #7:  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2007/04/23/robotface.jpg" alt="robotface.jpg" mce_src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2007/04/23/robotface.jpg" class="center" height="280" width="520"></p>
<p>I love the future. It&#8217;s always so exciting, and it loves to bite you in the butt when you suggest you know what&#8217;s coming next. Take this list of predictions from 1900, looking at what may come to pass in the hundred years ahead&#8230; a lovely list of hits and misses.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a taste:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Prediction #7:</b>  There will be air-ships, but they will not successfully compete with surface cars and water vessels for passenger or freight traffic.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><b>Prediction  #26:</b>  Strawberries as large as apples will be eaten by our great great grandchildren for their Christmas dinners a hundred years hence.</p></blockquote>
<p>Where will we be in 2100?<span class="byline">-Seamus Byrne</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.yorktownhistory.org/homepages/1900_predictions.htm" mce_href="http://www.yorktownhistory.org/homepages/1900_predictions.htm">1900 Predictions</a> [<a href="http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2007/04/back_to_the_fut.html" mce_href="http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2007/04/back_to_the_fut.html">Shiny Shiny</a>]</p>
<p><span id="more-245657"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/into_the_year_2000_future_past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour: Apple To Add &#8220;Top Secret&#8221; Features To Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/rumor_apple_to_add_top_secret/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/rumor_apple_to_add_top_secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/rumor_apple_to_add_top_secret.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the good folks at AppleInsider, Steve &#038; Co. plan to throw a few &#8220;top secret&#8221; features into Leopard, which may be the real cause for the operating system&#8217;s four-month delay. In the report, American Technology Research analyst Shaw Wu is quoted as saying that Apple will be good enough to reveal those secrets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="top_secret_macos.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/top_secret_macos.jpg" width="250" height="379" class="left" />According to the good folks at AppleInsider, Steve &#038; Co. plan to throw a few &#8220;top secret&#8221; features into Leopard, which may be the real cause for the operating system&#8217;s four-month delay. In the report, American Technology Research analyst Shaw Wu is quoted as saying that Apple will be good enough to reveal those secrets at the WWDC conference on June 11. In the meantime, we can only guess at what they might be.</p>
<li> iChat AV: now with Pet Tracker
<li> Keynote Steve&#8217;s &#8220;Boom!&#8221; system sound: finally replaces &#8220;Sosumi&#8221;
<li> CorePants: new API to design pants, because pants are important
<li> Three-fingered tracking on MacBooks: mmmmm, sexy
<li> TimeWarp upgrade: allows real-life time travel so OS releases always stay on schedule</p>
<p>Jump for exclusive picture of WWDC&#8217;07 keynote taken with new version of TimeWarp&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-245389"></span>
<p><img alt="corepants.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/corepants.jpg" width="520" height="345" class="center" /></p>
<p>Feel like discussing anything you&#8217;ve seen or read here? Fire away&#8230; <span class="byline">â€“Wilson Rothman &#038; Jesus Diaz</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/04/13/top_secret_features_suspect_in_apples_leopard_delay.html">Top Secret Features Suspect In Apple&#8217;s Leopard Delay</a> [AppleInsider]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/rumor_apple_to_add_top_secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
