<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>PowerZoa Would Be Great To Remotely Turn Off Your Stove</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/powerzoa-would-be-great-to-remotely-turn-off-your-stove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/powerzoa-would-be-great-to-remotely-turn-off-your-stove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power outlets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerzoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sockets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why? Because you could use the device to remotely cut power to any gadget that is plugged in to an outlet.
It&#8217;s only a prototype at the moment (one of many that have come out lately focused on saving energy), which probably explains why it still looks like a child&#8217;s toy. Not a good idea when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/powerzoa-thumb.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_powerzoa-thumb.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Why? Because you could use the device to remotely cut power to any gadget that is plugged in to an outlet.<span id="more-367361"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s only a prototype at the moment (one of many that have come out lately focused on saving energy), which probably explains why it still looks like a child&#8217;s toy. Not a good idea when you consider that it sits between the wall outlet and the plug of your gadget. At any rate, PowerZoa transmits details on your power usage to a secure website, where you can use the interface to turn specific devices on or off.</p>
<p>Sooner or later something like this will be widely available, and there will be a mobile phone app that would allow me to control everything. And when that happens, I will be all over it. [<a href="http://www.powerzoa.com/">Powerzoa</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/11/powerzoa-lets-y.php">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/powerzoa-would-be-great-to-remotely-turn-off-your-stove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say Hello To Your New Local Power Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/say-hello-to-your-new-local-power-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/say-hello-to-your-new-local-power-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hibot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power lines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helmeted workers in cherrypickers or precariously tethered to high voltage lines are as much a part of our power infrastructure&#8217;s aesthetic as towers and transformers. In the next few years, these iconic silhouettes will become a little more&#8230; mechanical.
Tokyo company HiBot is developing a robot to transfer the dangerous duties of high-voltage wire inspection from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1442789.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Helmeted workers in cherrypickers or precariously tethered to high voltage lines are as much a part of our power infrastructure&#8217;s aesthetic as towers and transformers. In the next few years, these iconic silhouettes will become a little more&#8230; mechanical.<span id="more-367201"></span></p>
<p>Tokyo company HiBot is developing a robot to transfer the dangerous duties of high-voltage wire inspection from meat-based humans to metal-based robots, in a move intended not just to decrease the likelihood of flash-frying technicians, but to make the inspection process &mdash; vital, now that many countries&#8217; electrical infrastructures have components approaching 100 years old &mdash; more efficient.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1442768.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The HiBot Exliner, pictured above and set to deploy in Japan, is the second such robot, and the most ambitious: While the LineScout, pictured at top and currently in trials in Canada, only inspects one line at a time, the Expliner will cover four. And unlike their human counterparts, Exliner and LineScout don&#8217;t even care if the lines are left active while they&#8217;re doing their respective things, because <em>they ain&#8217;t got nothin&#8217; to lose, y&#8217;know?</em> Also: because they&#8217;re properly insulated. [<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/robotics/industrial-robots/robotic-tightrope-walkers-for-highvoltage-lines/2">IEEE</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/high_voltage_line_robot.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/say-hello-to-your-new-local-power-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rotating Outlet Solves The International Outlet Smorgasbord</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/rotating-outlet-solves-the-international-outlet-smorgasbord/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/rotating-outlet-solves-the-international-outlet-smorgasbord/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international outlets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sockets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know that every country has its own plug, and that isn&#8217;t going to change anytime soon. But this spinning outlet is a pretty elegant solution to that problem.
There&#8217;s no real info on this thing, but it appears to offer most major plug types by spinning the three segments around. It&#8217;d be the perfect thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/rotatingoutlet.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_rotatingoutlet.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>We know that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/giz-explains-why-every-country-has-a-different-fing-plug/">every country has its own plug</a>, and that isn&#8217;t going to change anytime soon. But this spinning outlet is a pretty elegant solution to that problem.<span id="more-366499"></span></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no real info on this thing, but it appears to offer most major plug types by spinning the three segments around. It&#8217;d be the perfect thing to put in hotels, where people are continually unable to charge up their razor or laptop. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/mysterious-spinning-power-outlet-accepts-any-international-plug/">GadgetLab</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/rotating-outlet-solves-the-international-outlet-smorgasbord/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duct Tape With Embedded LEDs Opens Up A New Half-Arsed World</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/duct-tape-with-embedded-leds-opens-up-a-new-half-arsed-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/duct-tape-with-embedded-leds-opens-up-a-new-half-arsed-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duct tape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculpt-a-light]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think about all of the half-arsed repairs we can already do with duct tape. Imagine what it would be like if embedded LEDs were thrown into the mix? We&#8217;re talking half-arsed upgrades here.
In other words, you could use duct tape to actually pimp something out as opposed to simply keeping it together. That must be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sculpt-a-light.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sculpt-a-light.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Think about all of the half-arsed repairs we can already do with duct tape. Imagine what it would be like if embedded LEDs were thrown into the mix? We&#8217;re talking half-arsed <em>upgrades</em> here.<span id="more-364285"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sculpt-a-light-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sculpt-a-light-2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>In other words, you could use duct tape to actually pimp something out as opposed to simply keeping it together. That must be what designer Keywon had in mind when he came up with a prototype called Sculpt-a-Light. By rolling the tape and connecting the ends, you complete the circuit. Of course, you would need a smaller and more effective power source before anything like this could actually be considered for the mass market, but it is an interesting idea nonetheless. [<a href="http://keywon.com/log/2008/12/05/sculpt-a-light/">Keywon</a> via <a href="http://architectradure.blogspot.com/2009/10/sculpt-light-using-duct-tape.html">Architectradure</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/02/illuminated-duct-tape-will-make-your-professional-repairs-shine/">OhGizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/duct-tape-with-embedded-leds-opens-up-a-new-half-arsed-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allergy Warning: The ITER Fusion Facility Contains Coconuts</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/allergy-warning-the-iter-fusion-facility-contains-coconuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/allergy-warning-the-iter-fusion-facility-contains-coconuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coconuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermonuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokamak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;ll be a while before the first commercially viable fusion facility, ITER in France, is powered up. But before that can even ever happen, there&#8217;s a need for a massive amount of coconut-shell charcoal which&#8217;ll absorb byproducts of thermonuclear reactions.
Yes, coconut-shell charcoal plays a key role in a facility which is estimated to turn into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cocofusion.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cocofusion.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It&#8217;ll be a while before the first commercially viable fusion facility, ITER in France, is powered up. But before that can even ever happen, there&#8217;s a need for a massive amount of coconut-shell charcoal which&#8217;ll absorb byproducts of thermonuclear reactions.<span id="more-363861"></span></p>
<p>Yes, coconut-shell charcoal plays a key role in a facility which is estimated to turn into a $US10 billion project because for some weird reason the stuff acts like an &#8220;environmental sponge&#8221; and sucks up helium and hydrogen byproducts like nothing else. Experiments with the Tokamak reactor which is the heart of the ITER facility won&#8217;t even start until 2018, but I&#8217;m already getting concerned about what&#8217;s going to happen to the world supply of coconuts <i>now</i>. [<a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/energy/coconut-futures-and-thermonuclear-fusion-power">H+ Magazine</a> via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/10/29/148259/Thermonuclear-Reactor-To-Use-Coconut-Shells?from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/allergy-warning-the-iter-fusion-facility-contains-coconuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PS3 Slim Eats Half The Electicity Of The PS3 Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ps3-slim-eats-half-the-electicity-of-the-ps3-fat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ps3-slim-eats-half-the-electicity-of-the-ps3-fat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3 slim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony claims that their new PS3 Slim uses 34 per cent less power than previous generations. But when Crave compared the original 60GB PS3 to the Slim, they found power savings to be greater than 50 per cent.
Whether it&#8217;s Blu-ray playback, gaming or just idling the system, the PS3 Slim uses less than half the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ps3slimbolts.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ps3slimbolts.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Sony claims that their new PS3 Slim uses 34 per cent less power than previous generations. But when Crave compared the original 60GB PS3 to the Slim, they found power savings to be greater than 50 per cent.<span id="more-349412"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ps3limpower.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ps3limpower.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Whether it&#8217;s Blu-ray playback, gaming or just idling the system, the PS3 Slim uses less than half the power of the original.</p>
<p>So is that impressive? Yes and no.</p>
<p>Yes, because the PS3 Slim now uses about half the power of the Xbox 360 while gaming (96 watts vs. 187 watts). No, because the PS3 Slim still uses about four times more power during Blu-ray playback than you see in a Samsung standalone player (81 watts vs 22 watts).</p>
<p>In other words, the PS3 Slim is efficient for an HD game console, wasteful for a Blu-ray player. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10318727-1.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Crave">Crave</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ps3-slim-eats-half-the-electicity-of-the-ps3-fat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Energy Star Guidelines Lag Behind World In Clarity And Purpose</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/us-energy-star-guidelines-lag-behind-world-in-clarity-and-purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/us-energy-star-guidelines-lag-behind-world-in-clarity-and-purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=346198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. is supposed to be the worldwide masters of consumerism. But as pointed out by Pop Mech, their Energy Star guidelines are not just inaccurate, they fail to compare one product to any other product. There&#8217;s no context.
Meanwhile, take a trip pretty much anywhere else in the world and things change:
 Looking at an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/energy-intlb-470-0809.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_energy-intlb-470-0809.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The U.S. is supposed to be the worldwide masters of consumerism. But as pointed out by <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/home_improvement/4327728.html">Pop Mech</a>, their Energy Star guidelines are not just <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/home-garden/resource-center/energy-star-has-lost-some-luster/overview/energy-star-ov.htm">inaccurate</a>, they fail to compare one product to any other product. There&#8217;s no context.<span id="more-346198"></span></p>
<p>Meanwhile, take a trip pretty much anywhere else in the world and things change:</p>
<blockquote><p> Looking at an EU dishwasher label&#8230;The machine is rated not only on total energy and water consumption, but also on cleaning performance, drying performance, size and noise. At a glance, consumers get a sense of how this dishwasher stacks up against every other dishwasher on the market&#8230;.The American EnergyGuide label lists the manufacturer-submitted annual kilowatt-hours consumption estimate, compares that to the other manufacturer-submitted estimates, then crunches those numbers with another set of assumptions to project how much money it might cost to operate the machine for a year. It&#8217;s up to the shopper standing on the dishwasher aisle to figure out whether 100 or 1000 kilowatt-hours per year is a reasonable cost for clean plates.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Basically, the rest of the world gets a free issue of <em>Consumer Reports</em> on the label of every appliance they&#8217;re about to buy. The Americans need a subscription. [<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/home_improvement/4327728.html">Popular Mechanics</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/us-energy-star-guidelines-lag-behind-world-in-clarity-and-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dustbuster: Cleaning Up After You Since 1979</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-dustbuster-cleaning-up-after-you-since-1979/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-dustbuster-cleaning-up-after-you-since-1979/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black & decker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black & decker dustbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dustbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dustpan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo 79]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unveiled in 1978 but released in 1979, the Black &#38; Decker Dustbuster was a revolutionary home-cleaning device, and the only power tool a parent was likely to let a children play with. Vroom!
Reading this retrospective, I&#8217;m both surprised and unsurprised at how innovative and well-designed the Dustbuster is. It was rechargeable, wall-mountable, used a high-tech [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/340x_dustbuster-430-0509.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Unveiled in 1978 but released in 1979, the Black &amp; Decker Dustbuster was a revolutionary home-cleaning device, and the only power tool a parent was likely to let a children play with. Vroom!<span id="more-341403"></span></p>
<p>Reading this retrospective, I&#8217;m both surprised and unsurprised at how innovative and well-designed the Dustbuster is. It was rechargeable, wall-mountable, used a high-tech (for the time) design based on a familiar product (the dustpan), had an immediately catchy name and was instantly indispensable for every suburban family in the country. I remember sitting on the carpet and playing with it, which is certainly not something I was likely to do with a damn cleaning product, and the product&#8217;s name quickly became both a universal noun and verb (&#8221;Oh yeah, I Dustbusted the stairs yesterday.&#8221;).</p>
<p><object width="502" height="309"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LdKt061SShw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LdKt061SShw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309"></object></p>
<p>The Dustbuster is, I&#8217;m comfortable saying, the gadget nerd&#8217;s cleaning tool. It&#8217;s portable, battery-powered, cute, and versatile, and has definitely made our lives better. Cleaner, at least. [<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/home_journal_news/4318582.html">Popular Mechanics</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/the-dustbuster-cleaning-up-after-you-since-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Messless Charger: The Showoffiest Way To Charge Four Gadgets Simultaneously</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/messless-charger-the-showoffiest-way-to-charge-four-gadgets-simultaneously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/messless-charger-the-showoffiest-way-to-charge-four-gadgets-simultaneously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messless charger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the Callpod but fancier since it props up your gadgets on a shiny platform, the Messless Charger comes with six connectors for charging up to four gadgets simultaneously. It&#8217;s about $US100 thanks to the gloss factor, though. [pocket-lint]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_messcharger.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Like <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/266477/chargepod-universal-six+way-charging-system-hands+on-verdict-it-revolutionizes-charging">the Callpod</a> but fancier since it props up your gadgets on a shiny platform, the Messless Charger comes with six connectors for charging up to four gadgets simultaneously. It&#8217;s about $US100 thanks to the gloss factor, though. [<a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/25472/cutebitz-messless-designer-gadget-charger.phtml">pocket-lint</a>]<span id="more-341124"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/messless-charger-the-showoffiest-way-to-charge-four-gadgets-simultaneously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Tricklesaver Makes Sure Standby Consoles Don&#8217;t Cost You Money</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/tv-tricklesaver-makes-sure-standby-consoles-dont-cost-you-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/tv-tricklesaver-makes-sure-standby-consoles-dont-cost-you-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tricklesaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv tricklesaver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tricklesaver does two things: detect when your TV is off, and cuts off power to whatever console is plugged in so it doesn&#8217;t waste power when &#8220;off&#8221;. This is good, in theory.
In theory, a standby PS3 uses about $US250 a year when in the off standby position. An Xbox 360 uses a little bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/tricklesaver.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The Tricklesaver does two things: detect when your TV is off, and cuts off power to whatever console is plugged in so it doesn&#8217;t waste power when &#8220;off&#8221;. This is good, in theory.<span id="more-340788"></span></p>
<p>In theory, a standby PS3 uses about $US250 a year when in the off standby position. An Xbox 360 uses a little bit less than that. Both those consoles use a little bit of power to maintain the wireless receiver (and USB charger, if you&#8217;re charging a controller) while the main power is off. If the Tricklesaver shuts this off when the TV is off, you theoretically won&#8217;t be able to charge your controllers or turn on your console wirelessly.</p>
<p>The solution is to just turn on your TV before you activate your console. But there&#8217;s not much you can do about that controller charging. It&#8217;s also $US35, which is kind of steep for something that only has space for one TV and one console. [<a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/07/prweb2614284.htm">PR Web</a> via <a href="http://gonintendo.com/viewstory.php?id=88555">Go nintendo</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/07/08/tv-tricklesaver-cuts-your-power-bills-by-cutting-power-to-your-home-theater/">Oh Gizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/tv-tricklesaver-makes-sure-standby-consoles-dont-cost-you-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
