<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; popular science magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/popular-science-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>According Popular Science Magazine, We Should All Drive Humongous Wheels By Now</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/according_to_empopular_scienceem_magazine_we_should_all_drive_humongous_wheels_by_now-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/according_to_empopular_scienceem_magazine_we_should_all_drive_humongous_wheels_by_now-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popsci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular science magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/according_to_empopular_scienceem_magazine_we_should_all_drive_humongous_wheels_by_now-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouring the recently-posted PopSci archives on Google Books, reader Wesley Treat has put together a collection documenting the magazine&#8217;s odd, decades-long obsession with the idea of a personal monowheel.


Just as vague questions of cosmology and consciousness make up just about every other cover of New Scientist today, fantastical futurist gadgets were at one point the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/popsciwheel.jpg" style="display:block;" />Scouring the recently-posted <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/browse_the_empopsciem_and_empopmechem_archives_on_google_books_new_magazine_search-2.html">PopSci archives</a> on Google Books, reader Wesley Treat has put together a <a href="http://www.roadsideresort.com/blog/the-future-of-travel-revealed-the-ginormous-wheel">collection</a> documenting the magazine&#8217;s odd, decades-long obsession with the idea of a personal monowheel.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: retromodo, futurism, magazines, monowheel, monowheels, popsci, popular science --><br />
<span id="more-319799"></span>
<p>Just as vague questions of cosmology and consciousness make up just about every other cover of <em>New Scientist</em> today, fantastical futurist gadgets were at one point the safe default for the covers of <em>Popular Science</em> and <em>Popular Mechanics</em>. Like lots of the other cover staples, the monowheel has to some degree <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/monowheel-bike-ben-wilson.php">come to pass</a>, but hardly to the extent that you might have been led to believe it might in 1917. Or 1923. Or 1938. You get the idea. [<a href="http://www.roadsideresort.com/blog/the-future-of-travel-revealed-the-ginormous-wheel">RoadsideResort</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/according_to_empopular_scienceem_magazine_we_should_all_drive_humongous_wheels_by_now-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browse the PopSci and PopMech Archives On Google Books&#8217; New Magazine Search</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/browse_the_empopsciem_and_empopmechem_archives_on_google_books_new_magazine_search-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/browse_the_empopsciem_and_empopmechem_archives_on_google_books_new_magazine_search-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular science magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/browse_the_empopsciem_and_empopmechem_archives_on_google_books_new_magazine_search-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has added the complete archives of several magazines, including Popular Science (est. 1872) and Popular Mechanics (est. 1905), to its books search&#8211;complete with advertisements and illustrations. It&#8217;s awesome.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/popsci_google.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Google has added the complete archives of several magazines, including <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=0yoDAAAAMBAJ"><em>Popular Science</em></a> (est. 1872) and <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=RdMDAAAAMBAJ"><em>Popular Mechanics</em></a> (est. 1905), to its books search&#8211;complete with advertisements and illustrations. It&#8217;s awesome.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: the good 'ol days, archives, diy, google, google books, magazines, popular mechanics, popular science --><span id="more-318363"></span>
<p>There really is nothing quite like geeking out on the past&#8217;s vision of the future, and PopSci and PopMech are among the best for that, from the <a href="http://www.popsci.com/cars/gallery/2008-12/future-then">fantastic covers</a> to the equally fantastic <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=0yoDAAAAMBAJ&#038;printsec=frontcover&#038;source=gbs_summary_r&#038;cad=0_0#PPT1,M1">cigarette ads</a>. Google&#8217;s growing magazine collection also features <em><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=OugCAAAAMBAJ">New York Magazine</a>, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=r9QDAAAAMBAJ">Ebony</a>, the <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=XAgAAAAAMBAJ&#038;printsec=frontcover&#038;dq=atomic+scientists&#038;as_brr=1&#038;source=gbs_summary_r&#038;cad=0_0">Bulletin of Atomic Sciences</a></em> and more. Each page has its own URL, so it&#8217;s a blogger&#8217;s paradise. Say goodbye to doing work for the rest of the afternoon. [Official Google Blog]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/browse_the_empopsciem_and_empopmechem_archives_on_google_books_new_magazine_search-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealzmodo: Get A Free Copy Of Spore When You Subscribe To Popular Science</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dealzmodo_get_a_free_copy_of_spore_when_you_subscribe_to_popular_science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dealzmodo_get_a_free_copy_of_spore_when_you_subscribe_to_popular_science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular science magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dealzmodo_get_a_free_copy_of_spore_when_you_subscribe_to_popular_science.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s simple mathematics people: A copy of PopSci costs $8.95 on the newstand. A 12 month subscription costs $84.95, which works out at a saving of $22.45 over a year. A copy of Spore will set you back about $90. Which means that if you subscribe to PopSci this month, you&#8217;ll end up getting $112.45 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Pop-Sci.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/Pop-Sci.jpg" width="200" height="257" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>It&#8217;s simple mathematics people: A copy of PopSci costs $8.95 on the newstand. A 12 month subscription costs $84.95, which works out at a saving of $22.45 over a year. A copy of <em>Spore</em> will set you back about $90. Which means that if you subscribe to PopSci this month, you&#8217;ll end up getting $112.45 worth of free stuff for your 85 bucks.</p>
<p>Not only that, but you can enter the mag&#8217;s other competitions, which include the chance to win a $900 Blu-ray pack, a $900 Tamron lens and a $140 STM bag. That&#8217;s a lot of value for your purchase, right there.</p>
<p>The timeframe for the free Spore giveaway probably ends fairly soon, so you should get subscribing sooner rather than later&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.popsci.com.au/events-and-promotions/article/2008-11/get-copy-spore-free">PopSci</a>]<span id="more-314885"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dealzmodo_get_a_free_copy_of_spore_when_you_subscribe_to_popular_science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popular Science Names 100 &#8216;Best of What&#8217;s New&#8217; Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/popular_science_names_100_best_of_whats_new_technologies-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/popular_science_names_100_best_of_whats_new_technologies-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular science magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/popular_science_names_100_best_of_whats_new_technologies-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just last week, Time announced what they considered the 50 most important technological breakthroughs of 2008. Not to be outdone, today Popular Science has named their 100 &#8220;Best of What&#8217;s New.&#8221; Unlike Time, PopSci has categorised their awards into achievements in Automotive, Aviation &#038; Space, Computing, Engineering, Gadgets (of course!), Green Tech, Home Entertainment, Home [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/bestofwhatsnew_01.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />Just last week, Time announced what they considered the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/time_names_top_50_inventions_of_2008-2.html">50 most important</a> technological breakthroughs of 2008. Not to be outdone, today Popular Science has named their 100 &#8220;<a href="http://www.popsci.com/bown/2008">Best of What&#8217;s New</a>.&#8221; Unlike Time, PopSci has categorised their awards into achievements in Automotive, Aviation &#038; Space, Computing, Engineering, Gadgets (of course!), Green Tech, Home Entertainment, Home Tech, Health, Recreation and Security. But you&#8217;ve had enough of a tease; you just want to see the winners:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: popular science, best of what's new, magazines, popsci, popular science best of what's new, top, top 100 --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/popular_science_names_100_best_of_whats_new_technologies-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
