<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; pirates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/pirates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Viacom Top Lawyer On Obliterating Peer-to-Peer Users</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/viacom-top-lawyer-on-obliterating-peer-to-peer-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/viacom-top-lawyer-on-obliterating-peer-to-peer-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael fricklas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Fricklas is Viacom&#8217;s general counsel, the company&#8217;s top lawyer. I can&#8217;t tell if he actually felt bad when he said the above at a recent meeting with Yale Law students. I kind of feel an evil, dark smile inside.
 Even as part of a big company, and as a consumer, and as a guy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_viacom-quote.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Michael Fricklas is Viacom&#8217;s general counsel, the company&#8217;s top lawyer. I can&#8217;t tell if he actually felt bad when he said the above at a recent meeting with Yale Law students. I kind of feel an evil, dark smile inside.<span id="more-367525"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Even as part of a big company, and as a consumer, and as a guy who loves technology and loves gadgets and all the interesting things that are happening on the Internet, I kind of agree with [the criticisms] I actually care a lot about fair use… What we&#8217;re really focused on in our business right now is the exact copy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> I really don&#8217;t get it. If he really thinks this, why doesn&#8217;t he advise another course of action? Señor Fricklas, no comprendo. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/11/viacoms-top-lawyer-suing-p2p-users-felt-like-terrorism.ars">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/viacom-top-lawyer-on-obliterating-peer-to-peer-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Still True: Music Pirates Buy More Music</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/its-still-true-music-pirates-buy-more-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/its-still-true-music-pirates-buy-more-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been here before, so no long post necessary, but it&#8217;s worth mentioning, again, that illegal downloaders, the alleged scourge of the music industry, are really the ones who buy the most music.
So says a new survey out of the U.K., anyway. [The Independent via Boing Boing]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?s=illegal+downloading">been here before</a>, so no long post necessary, but it&#8217;s worth mentioning, again, that illegal downloaders, the alleged scourge of the music industry, are really the ones who buy the most music.<span id="more-364135"></span></p>
<p>So says a new survey out of the U.K., anyway. [<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/illegal-downloaders-spend-the-most-on-music-says-poll-1812776.html">The Independent</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/01/heavy-illegal-downlo.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/its-still-true-music-pirates-buy-more-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liveblogging Couple&#8217;s Pirate Captors May Have Been Apprehended</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/liveblogging-couples-pirate-captors-may-have-been-apprehended/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/liveblogging-couples-pirate-captors-may-have-been-apprehended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul chandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel chandler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven Somali pirates who may have played a role in the kidnapping of liveblogging couple, Paul and Rachel Chandler, are currently in the custody of the European Union. Their involvement is still unproven and the Chandlers remain missing.
The captured pirates&#8217; link to the Chandlers is based on a message from &#8220;pirate spokesman&#8221; Farah Abdi who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/piratecapture.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Seven Somali pirates who may have played a role in the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pirates-may-have-captured-around-the-world-liveblogging-couple/">kidnapping of liveblogging couple, Paul and Rachel Chandler</a>, are currently in the custody of the European Union. Their involvement is still unproven and the Chandlers remain missing.<span id="more-363575"></span></p>
<p>The captured pirates&#8217; link to the Chandlers is based on a message from &#8220;pirate spokesman&#8221; Farah Abdi who had made claims that his team held the couple captive in the first place, so some skepticism is required. I just hope my favourite sailing livebloggers are safe. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/world/africa/29pirates.html">NY Times</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/kuvat/2009/10/28/britain-piracy">Suomen Kuvalehti</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/liveblogging-couples-pirate-captors-may-have-been-apprehended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirates May Have Captured Around-The-World Liveblogging Couple</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pirates-may-have-captured-around-the-world-liveblogging-couple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pirates-may-have-captured-around-the-world-liveblogging-couple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul chandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel chandler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul and Rachel Chandler are a couple to envy. Still very much in love in their mid-50s and spending their days liveblogging sailing trips around the world. Sailing trips through pirate-infested waters where they may have been captured.
Perhaps it wasn&#8217;t the best of ideas for the Chandlers to publicly post their position while going through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/piratemap.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_piratemap.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Paul and Rachel Chandler are a couple to envy. Still very much in love in their mid-50s and spending their days liveblogging sailing trips around the world. Sailing trips through pirate-infested waters where they may have been captured.<span id="more-363222"></span></p>
<p>Perhaps it wasn&#8217;t the best of ideas for the Chandlers to publicly post their position while going through areas which are known to be frequented by Somali pirates, but at least it gives us their last known whereabouts and some hope that it was merely a temporary break in communication that paused their liveblogging instead of a pirate capture, but the cryptic final message of &#8220;PLEASE RING SARAH&#8221; leaves me fearing for their safety. [<a href="http://blog.mailasail.com/lynnrival">Lynn Rival's Voyages</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/27/british-couple-who-b.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/pirates-may-have-captured-around-the-world-liveblogging-couple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incredible Mindstorms NXT Theatre Creates Pirate Battle On Lego Seas</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/incredible_mindstorms_nxt_theatre_creates_pirate_battle_on_lego_seas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/incredible_mindstorms_nxt_theatre_creates_pirate_battle_on_lego_seas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mindstorms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/incredible_mindstorms_nxt_theatre_creates_pirate_battle_on_lego_seas.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
First of all, this whole motorised Lego theatre set up is legit. Skip to about 2:30 for a behind-the-scenes look at how it all works. Second of all, this is absolutely amazing.


For you NXT fans and collectors, here&#8217;s a parts list for this fantastic creation:
 &#8211; One Intelligent NXT Brick &#8211; One NXT Rechargeable Battery [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IkDsre1ltvk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IkDsre1ltvk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<p>First of all, this whole motorised Lego theatre set up is legit. Skip to about 2:30 for a behind-the-scenes look at how it all works. Second of all, this is absolutely amazing.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: lego, mindstorms, nxt, pirates, videos --><br />
<span id="more-336012"></span>
<p>For you NXT fans and collectors, here&#8217;s a parts list for this fantastic creation:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8211; One Intelligent NXT Brick<br /> &#8211; One NXT Rechargeable Battery<br /> &#8211; Three NXT Servo Motors<br /> &#8211; One NXT Light Sensor<br /> &#8211; One NXT IR Link (HiTechnic)<br /> &#8211; Two Power Functions IR Receivers<br /> &#8211; Two Power Functions Light Sets<br /> &#8211; Four Power Functions M-Motors<br /> &#8211; One Power Functions XL-Motor<br /> &#8211; Three Power Functions Battery Boxes<br /> &#8211; Three Power Functions Extension Wires</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Creator NextStorm promises a more detailed explanation for this fine creation, but for now this video will do just fine. [<a href="http://web.me.com/NeXTSTORM/NeXTSTORM/Welcome.html">NextStorm</a> via <a href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2009/05/17/jaw-dropping-lego-pirates-movie-made-with-mindstorms-nxt/">Brothers Brick</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/incredible_mindstorms_nxt_theatre_creates_pirate_battle_on_lego_seas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Of the Navy Capturing a Pirate Mothership</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/video_of_the_navy_capturing_a_pirate_mothership-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/video_of_the_navy_capturing_a_pirate_mothership-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[somali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[somali pirates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/video_of_the_navy_capturing_a_pirate_mothership-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We already showed you a hijacking from the pirate&#8217;s perspective, and now it&#8217;s time to turn the tables and see what it&#8217;s like to be on a Navy force taking control of a pirate mothership.


The 17 pirates on what is being called a mothership were in the midst of attacking the Egyptian-flagged Motor Vessel Amira [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/pirate-attack.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>We already showed you a hijacking from the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/somali_pirates_make_hijacking_home_music_videos-2.html">pirate&#8217;s perspective</a>, and now it&#8217;s time to turn the tables and see what it&#8217;s like to be on a Navy force taking control of a pirate mothership.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: pirates, hijacking, navy, navy capturing pirates, somali pirates --><br />
<span id="more-335974"></span>
<p><object width="508" height="320" data="http://www.dvidshub.net/player-viral.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="bgcolor" value="0x000000"><param name="flashvars" value="viral.onpause=false&amp;viral.callout=none&amp;repeat=true&amp;lightcolor=0xCC0000&amp;backcolor=0x000000&amp;frontcolor=0xCCCCCC&amp;file=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvidshub.net%2Fmedia%2Fvideo%2F0905%2FDOD_100042268.flv&amp;plugins=viral-1d"><param name="src" value="http://www.dvidshub.net/player-viral.swf"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"></object>The 17 pirates on what is being called a mothership were in the midst of attacking the Egyptian-flagged Motor Vessel Amira with assault rifles and RPGs when the Navy responded to their distress call. Mothership? Seriously? To be honest, it looks like a well-equipped strike force holding up a floating outhouse&mdash;but I digress. [<a href="http://www.thestate.com/world/story/786355.html">The State</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/video-navy-captures-pirate-mothership/">Danger Room</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/video_of_the_navy_capturing_a_pirate_mothership-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay Founders Plan a DDo$ Attack on the IFPI</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirate_bay_founders_plan_a_ddo_attack_on_the_ifpi-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirate_bay_founders_plan_a_ddo_attack_on_the_ifpi-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the pirate bay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirate_bay_founders_plan_a_ddo_attack_on_the_ifpi-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After the Pirate Bay founders were fined $US3.5 million, they swore they wouldn&#8217;t cough up a single cent. Instead, they&#8217;ve come up with a DDo$ plan of attack that&#8217;ll cost the IFPI instead of themselves.


Instead of collecting donations or paying the fee off themselves, Gottfrid Svarholm (anakata), one of the four Pirate Bay founders, has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/504x_swedes-pirates.jpg.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>After the Pirate Bay founders were <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/pirate_bay_four_found_guilty-2.html">fined $US3.5 million</a>, they swore they <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_pirate_bay_founders_issue_postverdict_statement_the_site_will_live_on-2.html">wouldn&#8217;t cough up a single cent</a>. Instead, they&#8217;ve come up with a DDo$ plan of attack that&#8217;ll cost the IFPI instead of themselves.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: the pirate bay, ddo$, ddos, law, piracy, pirate bay, pirate bay fee, pirate bay fine, pirates, sweden, the pirate bay ddo$ --><br />
<span id="more-335740"></span>
<p>Instead of collecting donations or paying the fee off themselves, Gottfrid Svarholm (anakata), one of the four Pirate Bay founders, has come up with the DDo$&mdash;not <a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2009/03/pirate_bay_under_attack_ddos_style-2.html">a DDoS as we know it</a>, but instead, a Distributed Denial of Dollars attack. The plan encourages all people who use the Internet to pay a tiny &#8220;internet-a.gift&#8221; (Internet fee) of $US0.13, and send it to the Danowsky law firm, which represented the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) in the Pirate Bay trial.</p>
<p>Because the law firm only has 1,000 free money transfers, if enough Internet users send a fee to them, it will actually end up costing the Danowsky firm and other music companies to handle and process all the payments. So not only will the Pirate Bay founders not have to pay the fine out of their own pockets, but also it could possibly play a role in the outcome of future pirating cases. [<a href="http://www.blogpirate.org/2009/05/10/pirate-bay-founder-crafts-distributed-denial-of-dollars-attack/">BlogPirate</a> via <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/11/1759241">SlashDot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirate_bay_founders_plan_a_ddo_attack_on_the_ifpi-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirated Copies of Windows 7 Will Still Get Windows Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirated_copies_of_windows_7_will_still_get_windows_updates-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirated_copies_of_windows_7_will_still_get_windows_updates-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirated_copies_of_windows_7_will_still_get_windows_updates-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conficker spread via PCs that weren&#8217;t updated with security patches, and not wanting to be at fault for ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/windows7pirate.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/how_the_conficker_problem_just_got_emmuchem_worse-2.html">Conficker</a> spread via PCs that weren&#8217;t updated with security patches, and not wanting to be at fault for <a href=http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/giz_explains_how_a_brainy_worm_might_jack_the_worlds_pcs_on_april_1-2.html">worldwide infections</a>, Microsoft is going to supply security updates to pirated copies of Windows 7. [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/not_so_crazy_redmond_protect_pirated_and_legit_window_7_copies">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: pirate windows 7, microsoft", piracy, windows, windows 7, windows update --><br />
<span id="more-335211"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pirated_copies_of_windows_7_will_still_get_windows_updates-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#8217;s EXACTO Rifle Will Be Able to Take Out Pirates A Mile Away</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_pentagons_exacto_rifle_will_be_able_to_take_out_pirates_a_mile_away-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_pentagons_exacto_rifle_will_be_able_to_take_out_pirates_a_mile_away-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exacto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snipers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_pentagons_exacto_rifle_will_be_able_to_take_out_pirates_a_mile_away-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EXACTO (EXtreme ACcuracy Tasked Ordnance) rifle will conceivably be able to fire accurately at far longer distances than are possible now by combating weather with self-guiding bullets. Yes, you read that right.


The Pentagon has been working on the .50 calibre EXACTO for about a year already, and its main focus is to overcome climate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/silent-scope-complete.328112.jpg" alt="" />The EXACTO (EXtreme ACcuracy Tasked Ordnance) rifle will conceivably be able to fire accurately at far longer distances than are possible now by combating weather with <em>self-guiding bullets</em>. Yes, you read that right.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: weaponry, exacto, guns, pentagon, pirates, rifle, snipers --><br />
<span id="more-334228"></span>
<p>The Pentagon has been working on the .50 calibre EXACTO for about a year already, and its main focus is to overcome climate conditions to stay accurate over a longer range. Here&#8217;s some jargon they&#8217;ve used to describe the kind of tech that might do such a thing:</p>
<blockquote><p>Fin-stabilised projectiles, spin-stabilised projectiles, internal and/or external aero-actuation control methods, projectile guidance technologies, tamper proofing, small stable power supplies, and advanced sighting, optical resolution and clarity technologies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Basically, we&#8217;re talking about bullets that can adjust to weather conditions in mid-air, either through external control or the abilities of the bullet itself.</p>
<p>Currently, snipers are really only accurate up to about 800 metres. Beyond that, it gets much harder to reliably hit a target: At 2,000 metres, snipers can probably hit the side of a barn, but a head shot isn&#8217;t too likely. This rifle could change all of that, and more importantly, lead to even more badass pirate takedowns than we&#8217;ve seen already. And we&#8217;re all about the pirate takedowns. [<a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1891348,00.html?cnn=yes">Time</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_pentagons_exacto_rifle_will_be_able_to_take_out_pirates_a_mile_away-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay Trial Update: Verdict Comes Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/pirate_bay_trial_update_verdict_comes_friday-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/pirate_bay_trial_update_verdict_comes_friday-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the pirate bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/pirate_bay_trial_update_verdict_comes_friday-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Pirate Bay finally hears back the verdict on Friday, and will deliver a live, online press conference at 13:00 Swedish Time (GMT+1). They invite you to listen. [Pirate Bay]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/piratebay-comic.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/the+pirate+bay">Pirate Bay</a> finally hears back the verdict on Friday, and will deliver a live, online press conference at 13:00 Swedish Time (GMT+1). They invite you to listen. [<a href="http://thepiratebay.org/blog/150">Pirate Bay</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: pirate bay, pirate bay trial, pirates, trial --><br />
<span id="more-334163"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/pirate_bay_trial_update_verdict_comes_friday-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
