<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Quantum Physics Visualised</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/quantum-physics-visualized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/quantum-physics-visualized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julian voss-andreae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sculptures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I wish that Julian Voss-Andreae had made some of these sculptures when I was in school. While we can&#8217;t really claim that they represent quantum physics concepts accurately, they still would&#8217;ve made reading about Bosons and Fermions more pleasant.

Julian left his quantum physics research path, but he certainly carried knowledge and inspiration from it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/quantumart.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_quantumart.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a> I wish that Julian Voss-Andreae had made some of these sculptures when I was in school. While we can&#8217;t really claim that they represent quantum physics concepts accurately, they still would&#8217;ve made reading about Bosons and Fermions more pleasant.<span id="more-367774"></span><br />
<a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_01d_collapseddodecahedron.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/7c/gallery_01d_collapseddodecahedron.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_03a_nightpath.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/c5/gallery_03a_nightpath.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_04_prayer_2up.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/d3/gallery_04_prayer_2up.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_07b_symmetrybreak_frontal.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/01/gallery_07b_symmetrybreak_frontal.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_11b_aristotelianproteins_kalata.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/cd/gallery_11b_aristotelianproteins_kalata.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_analyzedbird_solids.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/9a/gallery_analyzedbird_solids.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_brink_computer.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/bc/gallery_brink_computer.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_qm3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/5a/gallery_qm3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>Julian left his quantum physics research path, but he certainly carried knowledge and inspiration from it over into his art career. These sculptures are intended to portray some incredible quantum physics ideas for which there are &#8220;no consistent mental images.&#8221; That craziness aside, the sculptures are lovely eye-candy based on artistic merit alone. [<a href="http://julianvossandreae.com/acp/">Julian Voss-Andreae</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/17/sculptures-inspired-1.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/quantum-physics-visualized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is Simply The Coolest Pop-Up Book Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/this-is-simply-the-coolest-pop-up-book-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/this-is-simply-the-coolest-pop-up-book-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anton radevsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atlas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emma sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may not overheat in the presence of bread, but this pop-up book has the most accurate paper Large Hadron Collider ever. Figures that a book would make ending of the world by firing that bad boy up look fun.
The book&#8217;s called Voyage To The Heart Of Matter – The Atlas Experiment At CERN and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bang1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bang1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It may not <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/large-hadron-collider-overheats-due-to-dropped-chunk-of-bread/">overheat in the presence of bread</a>, but this pop-up book has the most accurate paper Large Hadron Collider ever. Figures that a book would make ending of the world by firing that bad boy up look fun.<span id="more-366430"></span></p>
<p>The book&#8217;s called <i>Voyage To The Heart Of Matter – The Atlas Experiment At CERN</i> and it&#8217;s written by Emma Sanders and crafted by Anton Radevsky. It&#8217;ll be out at the end of November and run for about $US33. I just want one because it&#8217;ll satisfy both the physics dork and the bookworm inside me all at once. [<a href="http://atlas.ch/popupbook/">Atlas</a> via <a href="http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2009/11/buy_the_hadron.html">Shiny Shiny</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/11/voyage-to-the-heart-of-matter-pop-up-book-features-cerns-lhc/">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bang5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/01/gallery_bang5.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_bang4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/22/gallery_bang4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/22/gallery_bang4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/22/gallery_bang4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/800x600_bang3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/43/gallery_bang3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/this-is-simply-the-coolest-pop-up-book-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confirmed: CERN Is Just A Huge Half-Life Level</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/confirmed-cern-is-just-a-huge-half-life-level/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/confirmed-cern-is-just-a-huge-half-life-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of people have given CERN and Half-Life&#8217;s Black Mesa research facility the This Thing Looks Like That Thing treatment, but this tour of the facility&#8217;s deepest bowels is just too much. Steam geysers? Endless corridors? Rusty valves? Slime growths?
Separate from the LHC itself, CERN&#8217;s labs are sprawling and fairly old, so it&#8217;s understandable if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC04756.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC04756.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Plenty of people have given CERN and <em>Half-Life</em>&#8217;s Black Mesa research facility the This Thing Looks Like That Thing treatment, but <a href="http://www.cernlove.org/blog/2009/10/underground-cern-its-half-life/">this tour</a> of the facility&#8217;s deepest bowels is just too much. Steam geysers? Endless corridors? Rusty valves? <em>Slime growths?</em><span id="more-363986"></span></p>
<p>Separate from the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/lhc">LHC</a> itself, CERN&#8217;s labs are sprawling and fairly old, so it&#8217;s understandable if they&#8217;re a little industrio-creepy. Which they are!</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC04728_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/aa/gallery_DSC04728_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC04743_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/97/gallery_DSC04743_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC04747_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/c5/gallery_DSC04747_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>But considering the facilities are intended for similar purposes (in theory), and the CERN already employs a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/cerns_gordon_freeman_employee_receives_crowbar_starts_murdering-2/">real-life Gordon Freeman</a>, the likeness here is just <em>uncanny</em>, as if CERN ripped the models and textures from Valve&#8217;s FPS and somehow actualised them. (Or, you know, the other way around, which actually makes sense.) Check out the full gallery at: [<a href="http://www.cernlove.org/blog/2009/10/underground-cern-its-half-life/">CERNLove</a> via <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/9zcln/beware_of_headcrabs_the_dark_corners_of_cern/">Reddit</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/confirmed-cern-is-just-a-huge-half-life-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Brief History of Williard Boyle and George Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/a-brief-history-of-williard-boyle-and-george-smith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/a-brief-history-of-williard-boyle-and-george-smith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge-coupled device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobel prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[williard boyle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Williard &#8220;Mr. Modesty&#8221; Boyle and George &#8220;Three Page Dissertation&#8221; Smith, extraordinary sailors and co-winners of this year&#8217;s Nobel prize in physics deserve time in our spotlight: they invented the CCD image sensors which gave our digital cameras eyes.
It took them a while to get there, but once they crossed paths, Boyle and Smith quickly got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/boylesmithb.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_boylesmithb.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Williard &#8220;Mr. Modesty&#8221; Boyle and George &#8220;Three Page Dissertation&#8221; Smith, extraordinary sailors and co-winners of this year&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nobel-prize-in-physics-rewards-fiber-optics-expert-ccd-creators/">Nobel prize in physics</a> deserve time in our spotlight: they invented the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/whats_the_difference_between_cmos_and_ccd_giz_explained_it/">CCD image sensors</a> which gave our digital cameras eyes.<span id="more-359879"></span></p>
<p>It took them a while to get there, but once they crossed paths, Boyle and Smith quickly got to work on our beloved CCD image sensors, changing our digital photographs forever. And one day, as the rest of the world had their eyes on the moon in 1969, they finalised their device, which would let us <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/hubba_hubba_hubble_desktop_backgrounds-2/">capture images of it</a>.</p>
<p>Williard Boyle had a brief teaching career after his stint in the Royal British Navy, earning his BSc, MSc and PhD from McGill University. He then moved on to join Bell Labs, working up to being director of the Space Science and Exploratory Studies department where he provided &#8220;support for the Apollo space program and help[ed] to select lunar landing sites&#8221;. After some time away from that, he &#8220;returned to Bell Labs in 1964, working on the development of integrated circuits&#8221;. All the while it was remarked that he truly was a modest and &#8220;self-effacing&#8221; man, almost a stereotype of the quiet genius.</p>
<p>While we don&#8217;t know whether he was cocky or modest, George E. Smith followed a vaguely similar path: he served in the US Navy, then earned a BSc from the University of Pennsylvania and a PhD from the University of Chicago, where he did in fact write a three-page-long dissertation. He also joined Bell Labs and began to research lasers and semiconductor devices.</p>
<p>Yes, with their beginnings in space exploration and lasers, it seems almost obvious that these two were bound to come up with something incredible, but I doubt that they even dreamed about inventing something that we would use or see results of on a daily basis.</p>
<p>Dearest Williard, beloved George: Today we thank you for your inventions and congratulate you on your Nobel prize. After all, without you, our porn wouldn&#8217;t be the high-quality digital video we so enjoy. [<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09100601nobelprize.asp">Digital Photography Review</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willard_Boyle">Wikipedia</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_E._Smith">Wikipedia</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/a-brief-history-of-williard-boyle-and-george-smith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobel Prize In Physics Rewards Fiber Optics Expert, CCD Creators</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nobel-prize-in-physics-rewards-fiber-optics-expert-ccd-creators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nobel-prize-in-physics-rewards-fiber-optics-expert-ccd-creators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles k kao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[willard boyle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So apparently a controversial Nobel Peace Prize was awarded this week. Forget that one. Focus instead on the far geekier one that was also awarded this week. Why? Because we gadget lovers have a lot to be thankful for!
The Nobel Prize for physics is the award in question, and it was actually split between two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/CCD_Nobel.jpg" alt="" class="left" />So apparently a controversial Nobel Peace Prize was awarded this week. Forget that one. Focus instead on the far geekier one that was <em>also</em> awarded this week. Why? Because we gadget lovers have a lot to be thankful for!<span id="more-359624"></span></p>
<p>The Nobel Prize for physics is the award in question, and it was actually split between two winners this year.</p>
<p>The first, Charles K. Kao, is the man most responsible for making fibre optic communication the force it is today. Whenever you fire up FiOS next, give thanks to Kao.</p>
<p>The second winner is actually two people: Willard Boyle and George Smith. These two chaps invented the CCD. No, not the Catholic classes your parents forced you to go to when you were a child, the CCD <em>device</em> that&#8217;s used in countless thousands of digital cameras and other similar gadgets.</p>
<p>Of course if you combine the two breakthroughs you get digital porn, for which, as far as I know, there is no Nobel category. Regardless, lots to be thankful for today. [<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09100601nobelprize.asp">DPRReview</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/10/nobel-inventors-prize-goes-to-creators-of-the-ccd/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/nobel-prize-in-physics-rewards-fiber-optics-expert-ccd-creators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>She&#8217;s Got It Where It Counts: LHC Hyperdrive Testing A Possibility</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/shes-got-it-where-it-counts-kid-lhc-hyperdrive-testing-a-possibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/shes-got-it-where-it-counts-kid-lhc-hyperdrive-testing-a-possibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parallels between the Large Hadron Collider and the beloved Millennium Falcon are becoming increasingly clear. Both take a bit of work to get off the ground; both feature rogue agents; and soon both could employ hyperdrive technology.
Except, obviously, in the case of the LHC this is real hyperdrive technology and testing we&#8217;re talking about, whereas, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/milLHC.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_milLHC.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Parallels between the Large Hadron Collider and the beloved Millennium Falcon are becoming increasingly clear. Both take a bit of work to get off the ground; both feature <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/large-hadron-collider-scientist-arrested-for-al-qaeda-links/">rogue agents</a>; and soon both could employ hyperdrive technology.<span id="more-359618"></span></p>
<p>Except, obviously, in the case of the LHC this is real hyperdrive technology and testing we&#8217;re talking about, whereas, sadly, Han&#8217;s bucket of bolts will remain firmly in the realm of sci-fi.</p>
<p>But no matter. If physicist Franklin Felber gets his way then an ancient, unknown German research paper from the 1920s could get dusted off and have its thesis tested in the LHC. Called the &#8220;Foundations of Physics,&#8221; the paper proposed that under certain circumstances a stationary mass can, on occasion, repel a &#8220;relativistic particle.&#8221; Ferber&#8217;s theory proposes that the opposite must also be true, and that this can be tested at the LHC.</p>
<p>In the experiment, Felber would monitor a test mass inside the ring as particles shoot past it. The work would not interfere with other already scheduled projects, and if it works we&#8217;d be one small step closer to unlocking that coveted near light speed achievement. That is, if the LHC ever starts up again. Where&#8217;s R2? [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24211/">Technology Review</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/11/physicist-wants-to-test-hyperdrive-propulsion-in-large-hadron-co/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/shes-got-it-where-it-counts-kid-lhc-hyperdrive-testing-a-possibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Large Hadron Collider &#8220;Light&#8221; Will Half-End World In November</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/large-hadron-collider-light-will-half-end-world-in-november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/large-hadron-collider-light-will-half-end-world-in-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colliders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fermilab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tevatron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=344732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we doubt the loud sex is the real reason for CERN&#8217;s LHC-related woes, we are certain of one thing this morning: The &#8220;world-ending&#8221; LHC (citation: ill-informed ignoramuses) LHC will restart at half-strength in November.
The reasons floated for the collider&#8217;s foibles are many as of late, from faulty hoses to un-magnetic magnets to the aforementioned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we doubt the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/the-real-reason-the-large-hadron-collider-keeps-getting-delayed/">loud sex</a> is the real reason for CERN&#8217;s LHC-related woes, we are certain of one thing this morning: The &#8220;world-ending&#8221; LHC (citation: ill-informed ignoramuses) LHC will restart at half-strength in November.<span id="more-344732"></span></p>
<p>The reasons floated for the collider&#8217;s foibles are many as of late, from faulty hoses to un-magnetic magnets to the aforementioned libidinous couple who&#8217;ve been assaulting coworkers&#8217; ear drums with wanton abandon.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, pressure from scientists have forced CERN to start the LHC up in November, where it will then smash atoms at half power until next year&mdash;when it will have to be <em>shut down again. </em></p>
<p>Meanwhile, this may all be moot, at least for now, as many scientists (publicly and privately) have turned their eager eyes to other colliders around the world, like Fermilab&#8217;s Tevatron, for use with similar experiments. [<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32332826/ns/technology_and_science-science/">MSNBC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/large-hadron-collider-light-will-half-end-world-in-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Fastest Car Wash Has Its Disadvantages</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/worlds-fastest-car-wash-has-its-disadvantages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/worlds-fastest-car-wash-has-its-disadvantages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carwash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carwashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liebherr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=344020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like there&#8217;s an adage in here somewhere. How about this: If you have to say &#8220;oh, but it&#8217;s just water!&#8221; before doing something, then you probably have no business doing it.

On a related note, it&#8217;s exciting to find out there&#8217;s another company besides Komatsu that makes trucks this big. Hey, Liebherr, do you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Picture_25.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_Picture_25.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>I feel like there&#8217;s an adage in here somewhere. How about this: If you have to say &#8220;oh, but it&#8217;s just water!&#8221; before doing something, then you probably have no business doing it.<span id="more-344020"></span></p>
<p><object width="464" height="362"><param name="movie" value="http://embed.break.com/ODkzMzcx"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://embed.break.com/ODkzMzcx" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" width="464" height="362"></object></p>
<p>On a related note, it&#8217;s exciting to find out there&#8217;s another company <em>besides</em> <a href="http://www.miningtopnews.com/komatsu-america-corp-announces-new-960e-1-mining-truck.html">Komatsu</a> that makes trucks this big. Hey, Liebherr, do you have review units? [<a href="http://www.break.com/index/the-ultimate-car-wash.html">Break</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/worlds-fastest-car-wash-has-its-disadvantages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Pack Of Canadians Claim They Can Deliver Nuclear Fusion, Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/a-pack-of-wild-canadians-claims-they-can-deliver-nuclear-fusion-on-the-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/a-pack-of-wild-canadians-claims-they-can-deliver-nuclear-fusion-on-the-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=343548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vancouver-based startup General Fusion has been running around claiming they can build a nuclear fusion reactor in the next 10 years for under a billion dollars. And some anonymous futurists just gave them 9 million dollars for their troubles.
Seeing that current nuclear fusion projects are expected to cost around 14 billion dollars (ITER project) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/ReactorCore_2.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Vancouver-based startup General Fusion has been running around claiming they can build a nuclear fusion reactor in the next 10 years for under a billion dollars. And some anonymous futurists just gave them 9 million dollars for their troubles.<span id="more-343548"></span></p>
<p>Seeing that current nuclear fusion projects are expected to cost around 14 billion dollars (ITER project) and take 20 years to complete, General Fusion&#8217;s reactor would indeed come at a bargain price. But how can they make this so cheap, and what makes them so confident they&#8217;ll succeed?</p>
<p>Well currently, the aforementioned ITER project is attempting to use astronomically expensive, superconducting tokamak magnets to keep superheated plasma in its place for a fusion reaction, while the National Ignition Facility is trying to use lasers to compress plasma into a reaction.</p>
<p>General Fusions wants to create a reaction using a mechanical process where 220 pneumatic pistons push acoustic waves through a sphere filled with liquid lithium and lead into a plasma ring in the centre. With 220 of these waves coming in at 100 meters per second, scientists hope that it will compress the plasma into a fusion reaction. And since the majority of the tech consists of long-established machinery, costs will be low.</p>
<p>If successful, General Fusion believes they can ultimately create a fusion reactor rated at 100 megawatts, that could potentially power a grid for 500 million dollars. The most recent contribution of 9 million dollars for General Fusion brings the total funding to 14 million, but they&#8217;ll need 37 million more over five years to build a working prototype. Um, can we pass a collection plate around? [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23102/">MIT Tech Review</a> and <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/07/24/general-fusion-developer-of-novel-nuclear-fusion-method-raises-9m-in-venture-financing/">Xconomy</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/a-pack-of-wild-canadians-claims-they-can-deliver-nuclear-fusion-on-the-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic, Gigantic Atom Smasher To Be Demolished</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/historic-gigantic-atom-smasher-to-be-demolished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/historic-gigantic-atom-smasher-to-be-demolished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom smasher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bevatron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory&#8217;s Bevatron was the world&#8217;s largest atom smasher when it was build for $US9 million in the early &#8217;50s. Soon, it&#8217;ll be reduced to a pile of rubble.
The 125,000-square-foot facility was one of the crown jewels of the world of particle physics back then, but at this point its sadly outdated and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_bevatron_1a.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory&#8217;s Bevatron was the world&#8217;s largest atom smasher when it was build for $US9 million in the early &#8217;50s. Soon, it&#8217;ll be reduced to a pile of rubble.<span id="more-340881"></span></p>
<p>The 125,000-square-foot facility was one of the crown jewels of the world of particle physics back then, but at this point its sadly outdated and has outlived its usefulness. But back in the &#8217;50s, it earned a Nobel Prize for Emilio Segré and Owen Chamberlain, who discovered the antiproton within a year of the Bevatron&#8217;s completion.</p>
<p>Just think: how long will it take for us to decide that the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/large_hadron_collider_might_annihilate_humanity_but_it_sure_is_pretty-2/">Large Hadron Collider</a> is an outdated piece of junk? And what will we be replacing it with? [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/07/bevatron/">Wired Science</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/historic-gigantic-atom-smasher-to-be-demolished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
