<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; photobucket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/photobucket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photobucket Backs Down on Baby Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/photobucket_backs_down_on_baby_photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/photobucket_backs_down_on_baby_photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photobucket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/photobucket_backs_down_on_baby_photos.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago we told you about the banning of pictures of babies in nappies from Photobucket. Photobucket has now backed down, restoring the baby photos and apologising for overreacting. It looks like its no-nudity policy is not quite as strict as first thought.
Of course, the main reason we posted this update is so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="left" height="306" alt="Baby.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/images/2008/03/Baby.jpg" width="255" />A few days ago we told you about the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/no_more_nude_babies_says_photobucket.html">banning of pictures of babies in nappies</a> from Photobucket. Photobucket has now backed down, restoring the baby photos and apologising for overreacting. It looks like its no-nudity policy is not quite as strict as first thought.</p>
<p>Of course, the main reason we posted this update is so we could run the baby photo to the left again. It&#8217;s just too cute not to. [<a href="http://www.cnet.com.au/software/internet/0,239029524,339286836,00.htm">CNET</a>]</p>
<p><span id="more-281584"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/photobucket_backs_down_on_baby_photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Nude Babies, says Photobucket</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/no_more_nude_babies_says_photobucket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/no_more_nude_babies_says_photobucket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photobucket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/no_more_nude_babies_says_photobucket.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anne Geddes would be appalled. Photobucket has banned images of babies in nappies from its site, saying that they violate its no-nudity policy. It says the policy applies to&#160;people of any age.
This was discovered after a US diaper company running a baby photo competition using Photobucket had all of its entries deleted by the image [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="left" height="306" alt="Baby.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/images/2008/03/Baby.jpg" width="255" />Anne Geddes would be appalled. Photobucket has banned images of babies in nappies from its site, saying that they violate its no-nudity policy. It says the policy applies to&nbsp;people of any age.</p>
<p>This was discovered after a US diaper company running a baby photo competition using Photobucket had all of its entries deleted by the image sharing service. <a href="http://www.cnet.com.au/software/internet/0,239029524,339286836,00.htm">CNET has the full scoop</a>, and while this policy on the surface might seem ridiculous, you can kind of see where it&#8217;s coming from. At what age, for example, should they set the nudity cutoff? I&#8217;m sure Photobucket doesn&#8217;t want to be tackling this kind of issue, so has sensibly decided that there will be&nbsp;zero-tolerance. [<a href="http://www.cnet.com.au/software/internet/0,239029524,339286836,00.htm">CNET</a>]&nbsp;</p>
<p><span id="more-281345"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/no_more_nude_babies_says_photobucket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TiVo Does HD Photos with Picasa and Photobucket</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/tivo_does_hd_photos_with_picas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/tivo_does_hd_photos_with_picas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photobucket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/tivo_does_hd_photos_with_picas.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TiVo today announced you can now access accounts with Photobucket and Google&#8217;s Picasa using any broadband-connected TiVo, and as a bonus, if you have a TiVo HD or Series3, you can see the pics in HD resolution. This isn&#8217;t necessarily a revolution&#8211;you&#8217;ve been able to pull photos locally from your computer for years now, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="TiVo_at_Eiffel.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/TiVo_at_Eiffel.jpg" width="463" height="347" class="center"/>TiVo today announced you can now access accounts with Photobucket and Google&#8217;s Picasa using any broadband-connected TiVo, and as a bonus, if you have a TiVo HD or Series3, you can see the pics in HD resolution. This isn&#8217;t necessarily a revolution&#8211;you&#8217;ve been able to pull photos locally from your computer for years now, and Photobucket and Picasa aren&#8217;t exactly the market leaders in this field. While Flickr and Kodak would probably have been our choices, just for the broadest reach, it still might be a nice way to browse not only your photos, but photos of complete strangers, using public tag searches like &#8220;puppies,&#8221; &#8220;Alex Rodriguez&#8221; or &#8220;rough sex.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.tivo.com/abouttivo/pressroom/2007PressReleasesPage.html">TiVo</a>]<span id="more-257644"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/tivo_does_hd_photos_with_picas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
