<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; parallels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/parallels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>QOTD: Boot Camp, Parallels Or Fusion?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qotd-boot-camp-parallels-or-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qotd-boot-camp-parallels-or-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boot camp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sitting here with my MacBook Pro and a copy of Windows 7, wanting to combine the two into the ultimate blogging machine. But how to do it? 
I could go the cheap option of Boot Camp, which only lets me boot one OS at a time, and is free. Or I could spring for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/parallels4.jpg" title="parallels" class="aligncenter" width="494" height="309" />I&#8217;m sitting here with my MacBook Pro and a copy of Windows 7, wanting to combine the two into the ultimate blogging machine. But how to do it? <span id="more-359030"></span></p>
<p>I could go the cheap option of Boot Camp, which only lets me boot one OS at a time, and is free. Or I could spring for a copy of Parallels or VMWare Fusion to do the whole virtual machine thing. </p>
<p>So the question today is which should I choose? Either because you want to know what the process is like, or because you recommend the solution – either one is fine by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qotd-boot-camp-parallels-or-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels Switch To Mac Edition Transfers Windows Programs For You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/parallels-switch-to-mac-edition-transfers-windows-programs-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/parallels-switch-to-mac-edition-transfers-windows-programs-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aside from letting you run Windows and OS X apps side-by-side, the latest version of Parallels has a cool migration wizard that copies Windows programs and files to the new Mac via a USB cable linking the two machines.
That&#8217;s pretty slick if it really means you don&#8217;t have to install your favourite Windows programs all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ParallelsSwitch2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ParallelsSwitch2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Aside from letting you run Windows and OS X apps side-by-side, the latest version of Parallels has a cool migration wizard that copies Windows programs and files to the new Mac via a USB cable linking the two machines.<span id="more-348705"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty slick if it really means you don&#8217;t have to install your favourite Windows programs all over again. It also looks a lot easier to use than <a href="http://www.vmware.com/download/fusion/windows_to_mac.html">VMWare&#8217;s converter tool</a>.</p>
<p>So the $US100 Switch edition is clearly aimed at newbies: good to throw-in if you&#8217;re buying a Mac for a long-time Windows user. They&#8217;re the ones who may benefit from the included two hours of flash-based Mac tutorials.</p>
<p>More: <a href="%20Which%20Is%20Faster?">VMWare Fusion vs. Parallels Desktop for Mac: Which Is Faster?</a> [<a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/stm/">Parallels</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ParallelsSwitch1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ParallelsSwitch1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/parallels-switch-to-mac-edition-transfers-windows-programs-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare Fusion vs. Parallels Desktop for Mac: Which Is Faster?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/vmware_fusion_vs_parallels_desktop_for_mac_which_is_faster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/vmware_fusion_vs_parallels_desktop_for_mac_which_is_faster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/vmware_fusion_vs_parallels_desktop_for_mac_which_is_faster.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically, it&#8217;s one of the biggest decisions you make when you get a Mac: How should I run Windows on it? Parallels or Fusion? An exhaustive battery of benchmarks by MacTech reveals a clear winner.

The short story is that in most cases, Parallels runs a solid 14-20 percent faster than Fusion, except in the rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/parallels.jpg" alt="" />Ironically, it&#8217;s one of the biggest decisions you make when you get a Mac: How should I run Windows on it? Parallels or Fusion? An <a href="http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.04/VMBenchmarks/">exhaustive battery of benchmarks by MacTech</a> reveals a clear winner.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: windows on mac, apple, fusion, mac, os x, parallels, virtualization, vmware --><span id="more-330053"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/fig01.jpg" alt="" />The short story is that in most cases, Parallels runs a solid 14-20 percent faster than Fusion, except in the rather limited scenario of running Windows XP 32-bit on two virtual processors.</p>
<p>Overall, running 32-bit Windows OSes with a single virtual processor, Parallels is 14 percent faster; with two virtual processors, Parallels is 20 percent faster with Vista, while Fusion is 10 percent faster with XP; and for 64-bit Vista, Parallels is 15 percent speedier. Depending on the task, the numbers vary&mdash;like transcoding MP3s can be up to 30 percent faster on Parallels.</p>
<p>MacTech&#8217;s tests are ridiculously comprehensive, spanning multiple machines with tons of different applications&mdash;the whole them took a couple months&mdash;so if you want the full, chart-heavy breakdown, head over there: [<a href="http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.04/VMBenchmarks">MacTech</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/vmware_fusion_vs_parallels_desktop_for_mac_which_is_faster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels 4 Now Available In Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_now_available_in_australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_now_available_in_australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_now_available_in_australia.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note for Mac users lusting for some PC software functionality: Local distributor Conexus today announced Parallels 4 for Australia. New users can pick it up for $140, and if you happen to own a previous version the upgrade only costs $70. If you picked up Parallels 3 after September 1 this year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note for Mac users lusting for some PC software functionality: Local distributor Conexus today announced Parallels 4 for Australia. New users can pick it up for $140, and if you happen to own a previous version the upgrade only costs $70. If you picked up Parallels 3 after September 1 this year though, you&#8217;re eligible for a free upgrade to the latest version, which as you remember purports to be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_out_now_50_faster_than_parallels_3-2.html">50% faster</a>.<br />
[<a href="http://www.conexus.com.au/detail.php?item=PAS001">Conexus</a>]<span id="more-315741"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_now_available_in_australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels 4 Out Now: 50% Faster Than Parallels 3</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_out_now_50_faster_than_parallels_3-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_out_now_50_faster_than_parallels_3-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_out_now_50_faster_than_parallels_3-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those running Intel Macs are probably at least familiar with Parallels, the famed virtualisation software allowing you to run Windows alongside OSX. Well now the company has just announced their fourth revision of the software, Parallels 4, that promises to run 50% faster than the previous version.


The virtualisation engine itself promises to use 15-30% fewer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/parallels4.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />Those running Intel Macs are probably at least familiar with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/search?query=parallels">Parallels</a>, the famed virtualisation software allowing you to run Windows alongside OSX. Well now the company has just announced their fourth revision of the software, Parallels 4, that promises to run 50% faster than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/boom/parallels-3-goes-live-266997.php">previous version</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: apple, parallels, parallels 4, software, virtualization --><br />
<span id="more-314596"></span>
<p>The virtualisation engine itself promises to use 15-30% fewer resources as well, while adding the option to run a Leopard Server in a virtual machine and including support for DirectX 9, DirectX Pixel Shader 2.0 and OpenGL 2.0. There are 50 new features and enhancements in all.</p>
<p>Parallels 4 is available now for $US80, existing Parallels customers can pick it up for $US40 and if you bought Paralells 3 on or after September 1st, you actually qualify for a free upgrade. Two months of lead time on free software upgrades? Not bad! [<a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/screens&#038;demos/">Parallels</a> via <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/macsoftware/news/index.cfm?RSS&#038;NewsID=23475">MacWorld</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/parallels_4_out_now_50_faster_than_parallels_3-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low-end Windows Vista Editions Now Allowed to be Run Virtualized on Macs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/lowend_windows_vista_editions_now_allowed_to_be_run_virtualized_on_macs-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/lowend_windows_vista_editions_now_allowed_to_be_run_virtualized_on_macs-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/lowend_windows_vista_editions_now_allowed_to_be_run_virtualized_on_macs-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that completely arbitrary rule by Microsoft limiting virtualisation (which lets you run Windows concurrently with OS X on a Mac) to only the more expensive versions of Vista? It&#8217;s now gone. 


Microsoft&#8217;s relaxed their ruling, which was previously justified by saying that virtualisation wasn&#8217;t mature enough for consumer adoption, which allowed them to clamp [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/AP08251107GI.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Remember that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/vista-on-the-mac-only-legal-with-enterprise-or-ultimate-editions-233231.php">completely arbitrary rule</a> by Microsoft limiting virtualisation (which lets you run Windows concurrently with OS X on a Mac) to only the more expensive versions of Vista? It&#8217;s now gone. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: mac, os x, parallels, software, virtualization, vista, windows, windows vista --><br />
<span id="more-274541"></span></p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s relaxed their ruling, which was previously justified by saying that virtualisation wasn&#8217;t mature enough for consumer adoption, which allowed them to clamp down on only the supposedly more pro or business SKUs of Vista. Combine this with the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/leopard_boot_camp_gets_64bit_windows_vista_support-2.html">news of 64-bit Vista support</a> yesterday and this is a good week for people who want to run Windows on Macs. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080121-microsoft-relents-vista-virtualization-ban-lifted.html">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/lowend_windows_vista_editions_now_allowed_to_be_run_virtualized_on_macs-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Parallels Ads Ape Mac Spots, Actually Feel Fresh</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/new_parallels_ads_ape_im_a_mac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/new_parallels_ads_ape_im_a_mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/new_parallels_ads_ape_im_a_mac.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While poor PC users still get the insulting end of the stick as Mac cozily snags their features, overall these spots feel less mean than Apple&#8217;s and surprisingly un-stale. John Hodgman&#8217;s presence is missed, but the Mac guy comes across as slightly less smug than Justin Long (probably &#8217;cause he&#8217;s way old). Complete collection after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="475" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mI31FphsEZc" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mI31FphsEZc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br />
While poor PC users still get the insulting end of the stick as Mac cozily snags their features, overall these spots feel less mean than Apple&#8217;s and surprisingly un-stale. John Hodgman&#8217;s presence is missed, but the Mac guy comes across as slightly less smug than Justin Long (probably &#8217;cause he&#8217;s way old). Complete collection after the jump.<span id="more-248638"></span><object width="475" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nLymCJHnW38" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nLymCJHnW38" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="475" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MlPvv6ujFiM" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MlPvv6ujFiM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="475" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7tmgnhfSYUs" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7tmgnhfSYUs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://parallelsvirtualization.blogspot.com/2007/07/coexist-with-parallels.html">Coexist With Parallels</a> [The Official Parallels Virtualization Blog via <a href="http://macslash.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/05/2333247">MacSlash</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/new_parallels_ads_ape_im_a_mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels 3 Goes Live</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_3_goes_live_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_3_goes_live_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_3_goes_live_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when we gave you deets on the new Parallels 3.0 last week? Good news: it&#8217;s done and released already. So if you&#8217;ve been waiting for it with sweaty anticipation, clean yourself up and go grab a copy. Tally ho, dual OS cowboys! &#8211;Adam Frucci
AU: Yay! We gave THEM some news this morning. ;-)
Product Page [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="parallelsscreen.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/parallelsscreen.png" class="center" height="327" width="525" />Remember when we gave you deets on the new <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/exclusive_more_details_on_para.html">Parallels 3.0 last week</a>? Good news: it&#8217;s done and released already. So if you&#8217;ve been waiting for it with sweaty anticipation, clean yourself up and go grab a copy. Tally ho, dual OS cowboys! <span class="byline">&ndash;Adam Frucci</span></p>
<blockquote class="au"><p>AU: Yay! We gave THEM some news this morning. ;-)</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop">Product Page</a> [via <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_desktop_30_goes_live.html">Gizmodo Australia</a>]<span id="more-247495"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_3_goes_live_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels Desktop 3.0 goes live</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_desktop_30_goes_live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_desktop_30_goes_live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_desktop_30_goes_live.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
These guys are fast. They announce one week, then deliver the next. Parallels Desktop 3.0 is now ready to roll, with all those juicy features we talked about last week.
Product Page [Parallels]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/vistamac1.png" width="520" height="248" class="center" /></p>
<p>These guys are fast. They announce one week, then deliver the next. Parallels Desktop 3.0 is now ready to roll, with all those juicy features <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/exclusive_more_details_on_para.html">we talked about</a> <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_30_supports_3d_windo.html">last week</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop">Product Page</a> [Parallels]</p>
<p><span id="more-247483"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_desktop_30_goes_live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: More Details on Parallels Desktop 3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/exclusive_more_details_on_para/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/exclusive_more_details_on_para/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/exclusive_more_details_on_para.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had a chat with the Parallels guys earlier today, and got some new information that should be very interesting to people who are even the slightest bit interested in running Windows on your Mac.
We went over some of the stuff we covered yesterday, but there&#8217;s lots of new stuff and even one major feature [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="parallelsscreen.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/parallelsscreen.png" width="525" height="327" class="center" />We had a chat with the Parallels guys earlier today, and got some new information that should be very interesting to people who are even the slightest bit interested in running Windows on your Mac.</p>
<p>We went over some of the stuff we covered <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/parallels_30_supports_3d_windo.html">yesterday</a>, but there&#8217;s lots of new stuff and even one major feature we didn&#8217;t mention: Snapshots.<span id="more-247225"></span>First off, the three major features are 3D graphics support, SmartSelect, and Snapshots.</p>
<p>3D graphics support is the shiniest feature everyone&#8217;s talking about now. Yes, it will support 3D games like Quake and Half Life, but no, right now it doesn&#8217;t support Vista Aero&mdash;that&#8217;s coming in a later release.</p>
<p>Parallels couldn&#8217;t give me an exact number when I asked for how much of a performance gap there&#8217;d be between running a game in Parallels and running it in native Boot Camp, but they did say that it&#8217;s very close to native and you wouldn&#8217;t really notice any gameplay problems. That, of course, depends on the game, but Half Life 2 ran fine on his machine.</p>
<p>One thing to note is that not all games will be supported by default. They&#8217;ll have a list of games they support, and the list will be updated whenever there&#8217;s a new build available. Hopefully your game will be supported at launch, but Parallels has a reputation for releasing frequent, and top-notch, updates.</p>
<p>The second major feature is SmartSelect, which allows you to set a preference for opening any file in any application, no matter which OS it&#8217;s in. Example: You can set text files to open up in Windows Notepad, so even if you double-click it in OS X, it&#8217;ll still pop open Notepad. Think of it as an extension of Coherence, which lets you run Windows apps in its own window on OS X.</p>
<p>On a side note, if you&#8217;re in Windows and you look in your start menu, you&#8217;ll be able to see all of the OS X apps listed under a Parallels folder, and have a similar option for opening Windows apps in OS X. Neato.</p>
<p>The third major feature is Snapshots, which lets you take a snapshot of your virtual machine so you can revert to it if something&#8217;s wrong. Do this before you install apps or make any major changes, and you&#8217;ll have something to fall back on in case anything goes wrong.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s super useful for software testers or people who make modifications to their OS, and only takes up minimal room on your hard drive per snapshot.</p>
<p>All in all, the guys tell us that besides the new features, everything else is more robust than even version 2.5, which just came out recently. With their track record, we believe them. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/upgrade">Product Page</a> [Parallels]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/exclusive_more_details_on_para/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
