<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; packaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/packaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>All Barcodes Should Be This Creative</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/all-barcodes-should-be-this-creative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/all-barcodes-should-be-this-creative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d-barcode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no reason for barcodes to be so drab and utilitarian when the sky&#8217;s the limit.
(Click image for big-i-fied version.)
For a few thousand dollars, Japanese design firm D-Barcode will make your business a custom barcode, incorporating these simple vertical lines into pretty much any type of scene you can imagine (the code serves as everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/barcodesnew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_barcodesnew.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>There&#8217;s no reason for barcodes to be so drab and utilitarian when the sky&#8217;s the limit.<span id="more-367193"></span></p>
<p>(Click image for big-i-fied version.)</p>
<p>For a few thousand dollars, Japanese design firm D-Barcode will make your business a custom barcode, incorporating these simple vertical lines into pretty much any type of scene you can imagine (the code serves as everything from noodles to trees to rain to strands of melty cheese in the work we&#8217;ve seen)&#8230;which begs the question, why is our packaging so lame?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to see more D-Barcode work, hit these links: [<a href="http://www.barcoderevolution.com/gallery/index.php?c=all">Bar Code Revolution</a> and <a href="http://www.thedieline.com/blog/2009/11/unique-japanese-barcodes.html">TheDieline</a> via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/cliff-kuang/design-innovation/japan-even-barcodes-are-well-designed">FastCompany</a> via <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/japan_has_some_of_the_best_designed_barcodes_in_the_world.php">NewLaunches</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/all-barcodes-should-be-this-creative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone Stop The Fastest Robot Packager In The World At Once</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/someone-stop-the-fastest-robot-packager-in-the-world-at-once/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/someone-stop-the-fastest-robot-packager-in-the-world-at-once/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adept quattro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For some reason, I can&#8217;t stop looking at the frenzy Adept Quattro robopackager, which reaches more than 300 cycles per minute. Go to 1:30 to see running at full speed. Must. Close. Window.[Adept via RobotBuzz via Botjunkie]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7iqHSlgpapY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7iqHSlgpapY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="370"></object></p>
<p>For some reason, I can&#8217;t stop looking at the frenzy Adept Quattro robopackager, which reaches more than 300 cycles per minute. Go to 1:30 to see running at full speed. Must. Close. Window.[<a href="http://ir.adept.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=419309">Adept</a> via <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.robotbuzz.fr%2Frobots-industriels%2Fquattro-record-robot-du-monde-de-vitesse%2F&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;history_state0=">RobotBuzz</a> via <a href="http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/03/adept-quattro-is-fastest-ever-for-the-moment/">Botjunkie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/someone-stop-the-fastest-robot-packager-in-the-world-at-once/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Old Gadgets We Love (And Four We Hate)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/four-old-gadgets-we-love-and-four-we-hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/four-old-gadgets-we-love-and-four-we-hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Jane Grossman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answering machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book excerpts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boombox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dial-up modems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getting lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laugh tracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsolete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsolete tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[push buttons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anna Jane Grossman, author of Obsolete: An Encyclopedia of Once-Common Things Passing Us By, has compiled a special short list for Giz readers, four things we&#8217;ll really miss, and four we&#8217;re glad are gone. (She&#8217;s pictured below, not above.)
Technology is all about what&#8217;s new and what&#8217;s next &#8212; today&#8217;s iPhone is just tomorrow&#8217;s paperweight. What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Anna_Jane_by_Amber.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Anna_Jane_by_Amber.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a><em>Anna Jane Grossman, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Obsolete-Encyclopedia-Once-Common-Things-Passing/dp/0810978490">Obsolete: An Encyclopedia of Once-Common Things Passing Us By</a>, has compiled a special short list for Giz readers, four things we&#8217;ll really miss, and four we&#8217;re glad are gone. (She&#8217;s pictured below, not above.)</em><span id="more-359346"></span></p>
<p>Technology is all about what&#8217;s new and what&#8217;s next &mdash; today&#8217;s iPhone is just tomorrow&#8217;s paperweight. What about the things that were &#8220;new&#8221; and &#8220;next&#8221; yesterday or the day before? We live in a time of so much change and progress that there&#8217;s nostalgia for things that kinda still exist. Here are a few that, for better or worse, are fading fast.</p>
<h3>What We&#8217;ll Miss</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Boombox_subway_sticker.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Boomboxes</strong><br />
Boomboxes forced social interaction. Yes, they may have sometimes been disruptive, but at least they were egalitarian: anyone could whip out a so-called &#8220;ghetto blaster&#8221; if they wanted to determine which song everyone else would hear. Today&#8217;s public places are flooded with people living in their own little aural universes. Personal music players give us autonomy, but it&#8217;s nearly impossible to have a conversation with strangers when you&#8217;re wearing headphones.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Push_button_thingy.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Push Buttons</strong><br />
Buttons used to be objects that symbolised intelligence-in cartoons and movies, complicated panels of them always signified something brilliant or sinister. The springy turn-things-on-and-off kind of button we&#8217;re accustomed to was born about a century ago. In the early 1900s, Eastman-Kodak introduced them on cameras (although at the time, they were called &#8220;electric snaps&#8221;). &#8220;You push the button, we do the rest,&#8221; was the slogan.</p>
<p>Today, buttons are becoming mere ideas: a link on a webpage; a &#8220;keyboard&#8221; on the screen of an iPhone. Thing is, sometimes buttons really do make things easier. My friend Mackenzie once watched Karl Rove try to figure out how to navigate the button-less elevator cars of the News Corporation (NY Post, Fox News, etc) building in Manhattan. &#8220;I could see his mind working, looking for buttons, but there were none,&#8221; she told me. &#8220;I just grinned at him as the doors closed, ready to take him to some mysterious random floor.&#8221; Good thing nobody cool works in that building!</p>
<p>For more on buttons, check out Bill DeRouchey&#8217;s <a href="http://www.pushclicktouch.com/">fantastic button blog</a>. Hey, everyone needs a niche. [Image from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/williamsphotos/2488067607/in/set-72157605027766384/">Williams Photos/Flickr</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Phone_Matic_Price_Right.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Answering Machines</strong><br />
I got my own phone line, princess phone and answering machine when I was 12. It was a big deal. Today my voice mailbox needs to be full before I&#8217;ll retrieve my messages, but back then there was such excitement in coming home and seeing the little red light blinking the number of calls I had. In earlier times, if you were out when you got a call, you may never have known that someone had tried to reach you. Can you imagine?</p>
<p>When answering machine usage became widespread in the eighties, phone usage surged across the country: people quickly caught onto the fact that you could make the requisite calls to exes and in-laws and creditors at odd hours without actually having to speak to anyone. By 1988, more than a quarter of all US households had one.</p>
<p>My favourite part of answering machine ownership was the outgoing greeting. I&#8217;d spend hours coming up with the perfect clip of music to play. Once, I even wrote a rap song:</p>
<p><em>Hey guys and gals let me make it plain:<br />
You&#8217;ve just reached Anna Jane.<br />
I happened to go out for a while<br />
So I&#8217;m not here to catch your dial.<br />
Leave a message, at the tone<br />
And I&#8217;ll call you right back when I get home.</em></p>
<p>Needless to say, I wasn&#8217;t very cool. [Price Is Right screengrab from <a href="http://lileks.com/bleat/?p=2910&#038;cpage=1">The Bleat</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Xbox_battery_blister_pack.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Easy-To-Open Packaging</strong><br />
It&#8217;s Christmas morning, the gifts are all unwrapped, and in homes all around the world mums and dads are wielding sharp objects. How else are they supposed to open the thermoplastic polymer clam-shell packaging that now envelopes nearly anything that can be purchased? I have scars. And I also have memories of freeing dolls from their packaging by simply opening a box. For our ancestors, the only thing that required that kind of exertion was, perhaps, hunting for dinner. Today, hamburger meat comes in cellophane that&#8217;s easily torn away…but if you want an external hard drive, you better be prepared to go in for the slaughter. [Blister pack frustration image from <a href="http://www.rahindeed.com/?p=8">Rahindeed</a>]</p>
<h3>What We Won&#8217;t Miss</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_TV_on_road.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Tube TVs</strong><br />
I have a tube set. Want it? It&#8217;s yours—but you have to come get it. When I bought it in 2006—after a friend assured me the picture quality was better than any flat screen set, as if I&#8217;d notice—it took me and three girlfriends an hour to get it out of the box. And two of those girlfriends were men.</p>
<p>Tube sets work thanks to the cathode ray tube, aka CRT, which fires electrons that light up a phosphorous coating on the inside of a curved glass screen. The bigger the screen, the bigger the tube has to be—and the more your household starts to seem like it revolves around a washing machine that occasionally shelters a man name Brady who has three boys of his own. In 1973, Sony&#8217;s Trinitron tube television was so admired it became the first TV set to win an Emmy. Today, however, the CRT&#8217;s contribution to entertainment is not so appreciated: The 115kg 40-inch sets you can find for cheap on eBay all come with the &#8220;Pick-up only&#8221; shipping caveat. And many Salvation Armies and Goodwill donation centres in the US no longer accept anything but flat screens. [Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lloth/310483484/">lloth/Flickr</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Small_wonder_Laugh_track.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Laugh Tracks</strong><br />
In the 1950s, sound engineer Charles Douglass recorded people laughing at a series of mime shows. (Yes, people used to laugh at mime shows.) He then put the recordings into a piano-like machine which he called the Laff Box. TV viewers were used to sitting in theatres where they could hear other people&#8217;s reactions, so TV producers argued that home audiences needed similar cues while watching sitcoms. Thanks to this reasoning, we suffered through several decades of comedies where it seemed like beneath every couch lived a hysterical hyena. I recall, as a child, sitting stone-faced through episodes of Small Wonder, hearing all the &#8220;people&#8221; laughing at the jokes. I just figured it was my poor sense of humour.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_War_games_modem.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Dial-up Modems</strong><br />
Before iTunes and Pandora, there was really only one soundtrack that anyone associated with the Internet. It started with a lulling dial tone, then came the little beeps of a phone being dialled, then a series of longer beeps in different octaves, then screeching, static, more static, a coughing-up-phlegm sound and then…&#8221;You&#8217;ve got mail!&#8221; In my household, there was kind of a call and response between humans and modems: After it sputtered through its routine, I would sing out a few choice words about how long each page was taking to load.</p>
<p>In 2006, Apple released a MacBook Pro without a modem, and a lot of people flipped out. But the truth is, not many ended up missing it. By the previous year, the number of people using broadband devices had surpassed the dial-uppers. Today, only one in 10 people use dial-up connections. I pray for them. [War Games shot from <a href="http://pc-museum.com/046-imsai8080/wargames.htm">PC Museum</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Getting_lost.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><strong>Getting Lost</strong><br />
In 1983, President Reagan decreed that a military project known as Navstar would be opened up to the public. It is now known as the global positioning system. Little did the Gipper know how this decision would affect the lives of so many couples who&#8217;d grown accustomed to deadlocking on whether or not to ask for directions. It&#8217;d also lead to fewer people handing the phone to someone better at giving directions, or suggesting navigation tips based on the distance to an Arby&#8217;s. And there&#8217;d be a serious dip in the number of cartographer wannabes mapping out entire highways on a square cocktail napkin.</p>
<p>As someone who can hardly locate her own elbow, I am pretty glad that nearly every phone now can tell me to make the next legal U-turn. However, in addition to having no sense of direction, I have issues with punctuality — and it kind of sucks that I can no longer use &#8220;I got lost&#8221; as an excuse when I&#8217;m late. I mean, I guess I could. Actually, sometimes I do. Usually it&#8217;s because I&#8217;ve lost my phone.</p>
<p>Call me crazy, but sometimes I like to dance when I listen to music. If I were able to play my music aloud, I wouldn&#8217;t look so strange doing the Running Man alone on the subway platform.</p>
<p><i>Got any more dead innovations you want to lament or wish good riddance? Chances are Anna Jane covered them in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Obsolete-Encyclopedia-Once-Common-Things-Passing/dp/0810978490">her book</a>, but until you pick up a copy, you might as well comment about it below.</i></p>
<p><i>Anna Jane Grossman is the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Obsolete-Encyclopedia-Once-Common-Things-Passing/dp/0810978490">Obsolete: An Encyclopedia of Once-Common Things Passing Us By (Abrams Image)</a> and the creator of <a href="http://obsoletethebook.tumblr.com/">iamobsolete.net</a>. Her writing has appeared in dozens of publications, including the New York Times, Salon.com, the Associated Press, Elle and the Huffington Post. She has a complicated relationship with technology, but she does have an eponymous website: <a href="http://annajane.net/">AnnaJane.net</a>. [</i> Photo of Anna Jane by <a href="http://theambershow.net/">Amber Marlow Blatt</a>, from <a href="http://heybrooklyn.com/podcast/207/episode-23-anna-jane-grossman">Hey Brooklyn</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/four-old-gadgets-we-love-and-four-we-hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Original Snow Leopard Was Too Blood Thirsty For Mac OS X Box</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/original-snow-leopard-was-too-blood-thirsty-for-mac-os-x-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/original-snow-leopard-was-too-blood-thirsty-for-mac-os-x-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#8217;m obsessed with the new Mac OS X box. But I treated the poor snow leopard badly. This is not a clipart pussy cat. This is one serious blood thirsty beast who was censored by Apple. Spot the difference:


The first one is the Snow Leopard that comes in the box and Apple&#8217;s site. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/not-blood.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_not-blood.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Yes, I&#8217;m <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/8-years-of-great-mac-os-x-box-design-end-in-a-stupid-clip-art-cat/">obsessed with the new Mac OS X box</a>. But I treated the poor snow leopard badly. This is not a clipart pussy cat. This is one serious blood thirsty beast who was censored by Apple. Spot the difference:<span id="more-348721"></span><br />
<div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/blood.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_blood.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a></p>
<p>The first one is the Snow Leopard that comes in the box and Apple&#8217;s site. The second one, which shows clear traces of blood around his mouth, is the one that ships <i>inside</i> Mac OS X Snow Leopard, as a desktop background. It seems that our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/windows_7_kills_snow_leopard_and_eats_it-2/">Windows 7 killing Snow Leopard and eating it</a> report was greatly exaggerated.</p>
<p>It was totally wrong in fact. It <i>is</i> Snow Leopard who killed Windows 7. And all its development team. A two zoo guides. And six babies and their mums. BAD CAT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/original-snow-leopard-was-too-blood-thirsty-for-mac-os-x-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Years Of Great Mac OS X Box Design End In A Stupid Clip Art Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/8-years-of-great-mac-os-x-box-design-end-in-a-stupid-clip-art-cat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/8-years-of-great-mac-os-x-box-design-end-in-a-stupid-clip-art-cat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mac OS X Snow Leopard leaked box is real. And painful to watch. What happened to eight years of great packaging design? Are ideas running so low in Cupertino that they had to grab a cat from a clip art package?
I understand cost-cutting measures. Production-wise, the first Leopard box is probably the most expensive of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/osxhistory.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_osxhistory.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Mac OS X Snow Leopard <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/10/oh_mac_os_x_leopard_box/">leaked box</a> is <a href="hhttp://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/snow-leopard-shipping-august-28th/">real</a>. And painful to watch. What happened to eight years of great packaging design? Are ideas running so low in Cupertino that they had to grab a cat from a clip art package?<span id="more-348429"></span></p>
<p>I understand cost-cutting measures. Production-wise, the first Leopard box is probably the most expensive of them all. But after the good design logic that went into every single box before Snow Leopard, I can&#8217;t understand how they have settled with this bland design. Especially in <i>this</i> release: The new OS is packed with strong features under the hood, but no wowiezowie eye candy or any must-have-or-die new tool&#8230;so why not mark the engine improvements with an awesome box? Or, if not awesome, at least a solid design that tells a good story.</p>
<p>Because right now, the only story I get is, &#8220;Hi, I&#8217;m a bloody white cat with spots who has been hunting wabbits on the snow all day. I&#8217;m wet.&#8221; Veehee lame indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/8-years-of-great-mac-os-x-box-design-end-in-a-stupid-clip-art-cat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zune HD Box Spotted In The Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/zune-hd-box-spotted-in-the-wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/zune-hd-box-spotted-in-the-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a Twitter tipster, this right here is the official Zune HD packaging. It&#8217;s pretty much the same as previous Zune boxes, but with colour, because the Zune HD is the rainbow of the Zune family. [Twitter via Engadget]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/zune-hd-box-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_zune-hd-box-1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>According to a Twitter tipster, this right here is the official Zune HD packaging. It&#8217;s pretty much the same as previous Zune boxes, but with colour, because the Zune HD is the rainbow of the Zune family. [<a href="http://twitpic.com/evwnl">Twitter</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/22/zune-hd-box-spotted/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/zune-hd-box-spotted-in-the-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Ships Power Cord In Giant Box With Attached Pallet</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/hp-ships-power-cord-in-giant-box-with-attached-pallet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/hp-ships-power-cord-in-giant-box-with-attached-pallet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you get a package this size, reinforced with a damn wooden pallet, your first thought is probably that you&#8217;ve accidentally received, say, six laptops, or a fridge or a mid-sized sedan. But you&#8217;d be wrong.
The only thing that came in this monstrous package is a simple power cord that HP inexplicably shipped in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/hppellet.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_hppellet.gif" alt="" class="center" /></a>If you get a package this size, reinforced with a damn wooden pallet, your first thought is probably that you&#8217;ve accidentally received, say, six laptops, or a fridge or a mid-sized sedan. But you&#8217;d be wrong.<span id="more-348310"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/hpcord.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_hpcord.gif" alt="" class="center" /></a>The only thing that came in this monstrous package is a simple power cord that HP inexplicably shipped in a box sturdy enough to ship the entire Canadian army. There&#8217;s probably a story behind it&mdash;I&#8217;ve never in my life seen a package delivered while still strapped to a wooden pallet&mdash;but as it stands, we can just bask in the ridiculous juxtaposition of tiny item, giant box. [<a href="http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=409825">Notebook Review Forums</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/hp-ships-power-cord-in-giant-box-with-attached-pallet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Winner Of The &#8220;Worst Shipping Practices&#8221; Award</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/new-winner-of-the-worst-shipping-practices-award/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/new-winner-of-the-worst-shipping-practices-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=344713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It&#8217;s a competitive category, trust me. We&#8217;ve seen some pretty ridiculous abuses of packaging and shipping in our day. But this one&#8217;s great, especially since the box is upside-down and sort of crushed-looking. Congratulations to the winner loser. [Geekologie]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/dell-shipping.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><br />
It&#8217;s a competitive category, trust me. We&#8217;ve seen some pretty <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/motorola_sends_teeny_ear_clips_in_huge_cardboard_box-2/">ridiculous abuses</a> of packaging and shipping in our day. But this one&#8217;s great, especially since the box is upside-down and sort of crushed-looking. Congratulations to the winner loser. [<a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/08/youre_doing_it_wrong_dell_ship.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/new-winner-of-the-worst-shipping-practices-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughtful Packaging</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/thoughtful_packaging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/thoughtful_packaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridiculous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping hall of fame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/thoughtful_packaging.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toothpaste for Dinner has a take on the ridiculous packaging phenomenon, where Amazon (or whoever) sends you a box that you can shove a toddler into for an SD card. [Toothpaste For Dinner via Consumerist]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/packing-material.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/archives/2009/May/?#862">Toothpaste for Dinner</a> has a take on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/packaging/">ridiculous packaging</a> phenomenon, where Amazon (or whoever) sends you a box that you can shove a toddler into for an SD card. [<a href="http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/archives/2009/May/?#862">Toothpaste For Dinner</a> via <a href="http://consumerist.com/5264565/continuing-adventures-of-the-stupid-shipping-gang">Consumerist</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: packaging, ridiculous packaging, ridiculous shipping, shipping, shipping hall of fame --><span id="more-336260"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/thoughtful_packaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duct Tape or Zip-Ties: Which Is Your Favourite Quick Fix?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/duct_tape_or_zipties_which_is_your_favourite_quick_fix-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/duct_tape_or_zipties_which_is_your_favourite_quick_fix-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/duct_tape_or_zipties_which_is_your_favourite_quick_fix-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where would nerds be without duct tape and zip-ties? Both are useful in a wide range of scenarios (don&#8217;t say kidnapping), but if you had to pick your favourite, which would it be?


 Which Is Your Favourite Quick Fix? ( online surveys)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/duct-tape-zip-ties.jpg" alt="" />Where would nerds be without duct tape and zip-ties? Both are useful in a wide range of scenarios (don&#8217;t say kidnapping), but if you had to pick your favourite, which would it be?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: question of the day, duct tape, zip ties --><br />
<span id="more-333396"></span>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" language="javascript" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1522266.js"> </script><noscript><a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1522266/">Which Is Your Favourite Quick Fix?</a><br /> <span style="font-size:9px;">( <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">online surveys</a>)</span></noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/duct_tape_or_zipties_which_is_your_favourite_quick_fix-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
