<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; msi wind u110 eco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/msi-wind-u110-eco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MSI Wind U110 Eco Updated (Slightly) With 15-Hour Battery Life</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/msi-wind-u110-eco-updated-slightly-with-15-hour-battery-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/msi-wind-u110-eco-updated-slightly-with-15-hour-battery-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi wind u110 eco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u110 eco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSI&#8217;s Wind U110 was a perfectly fine netbook when it was released in January, but the newer Toshiba NB205 and HP Mini 5101 make it look outdated. MSI updated the U110 with a 15-hour, 9-cell battery, but is that enough?
Basically, this is the same netbook as the older U110&#8212;same 1.6GHz Atom, same lack of dedicated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/msi-wind-u110-eco.jpg" alt="" class="left" />MSI&#8217;s Wind U110 was a perfectly fine netbook when it was released in January, but the newer Toshiba NB205 and HP Mini 5101 make it look outdated. MSI updated the U110 with a 15-hour, 9-cell battery, but is that enough?<span id="more-355180"></span></p>
<p>Basically, this is the same netbook as the older U110&mdash;same 1.6GHz Atom, same lack of dedicated graphics (it&#8217;s got an integrated chip rather than the newer ATI Radeon HD3200 card), same 1GB memory and same 160GB hard drive. It&#8217;s also offered with either Windows XP or Vista. The only difference here is that giant 9-cell battery which supposedly gives a 15-hour run, and I guess the &#8220;Eco&#8221; name, which doesn&#8217;t seem to refer to any particular environmental update. List price is $US430, though <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/141362==http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152142&amp;nm_mc=OTC-Froogle&amp;cm_mmc=OTC-Froogle-_-Netbooks-_-MSI+COMPUTER-_-34152142">Newegg has it</a> right now for $US400. [<a href="http://www.swiftpage3.com/SpeClicks.aspx?X=2V0NGKN5HQZAJ4A4010WX4">MSI</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/msi-wind-u110-eco-updated-slightly-with-15-hour-battery-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
