<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; military</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bitch-Busting, Ammo-Counting Aliens Gun Is Real, Scary</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bitch-busting-ammo-counting-aliens-gun-is-real-scary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bitch-busting-ammo-counting-aliens-gun-is-real-scary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Apoorva Prasad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armatronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milipol 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moving red dot fire control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Milipol, I was walking around FN Herstal&#8217;s booth, playing with futuristic-looking P90s, Five-Sevens and F2000s when I noticed a camera-toting tourist pretend-blasting with something very very cool: The Armatronics &#8220;Black Box&#8221; suite with Moving Red Dot Fire Control.
They&#8217;d taken a SCAR assault rifle and put a &#8220;black box&#8221; inside the handgrip, networking it with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/armatronics_tourist.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_armatronics_tourist.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>At <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/">Milipol</a>, I was walking around FN Herstal&#8217;s booth, playing with futuristic-looking <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_P90">P90s</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-seven">Five-Sevens</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F2000">F2000s</a> when I noticed a camera-toting tourist pretend-blasting with something very very cool: The Armatronics &#8220;Black Box&#8221; suite with Moving Red Dot Fire Control.<span id="more-368478"></span></p>
<p>They&#8217;d taken a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_SCAR">SCAR assault rifle</a> and put a &#8220;black box&#8221; inside the handgrip, networking it with the soldier (&#8221;with a kind of Bluetooth&#8221; according to the PR guy), and also to home base. The grip is a sealed, 10-year unit that logs the number of bullets fired and remaining ammo &agrave; la <em>Aliens</em>. They&#8217;re also working on pairing to specific soldiers, perhaps using biometrics. Deactivating it if the Taliban get it, for instance? &#8220;In the near future,&#8221; said PR man enigmatically.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/armatronics_counter.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_armatronics_counter.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The second part of the suite is the Moving Red Dot Fire Control Unit, which is a networked firing solution computer for the grenade launcher. You press a button next to the trigger to activate the laser rangefinder, then the computer calculates the solution and shows it to you in the LED display. That&#8217;s right &mdash; <i>laser-guided grenades</i>. You are your own air support. [<a href="http://www.fnherstal.com/">FN Herstal</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/armatronics_black_box.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_armatronics_black_box.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.apoorvaprasad.com/joomla/index.php/articles">Apoorva Prasad</a> is a freelance writer and photographer based in Paris, France, who covered the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/">Milipol 2009 military-police expo</a> for us. He has a thing for holo-scoped assault rifles, and sounds disappointed when admitting he&#8217;s never been Tased.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bitch-busting-ammo-counting-aliens-gun-is-real-scary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weapons, Robots And Spy Gear From The Paris Military-Police Expo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Apoorva Prasad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Milipol exhibition in Paris is where all the pros play with the military-industrial complex&#8217;s hottest toys. I used special commando skills (and a press badge) to infiltrate the premises and show you the world&#8217;s freshest, most mind-blowing security tech.
OSA PB2 &#8220;Less-Lethal&#8221; Multipurpose Pistol
Ever since I watched Rosa Klebb trying to kill Bond with her [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://public-prod.milipol.timfair.com/Paris2009/welcome.php?page=home&#038;divers">Milipol exhibition in Paris</a> is where all the pros play with the military-industrial complex&#8217;s hottest toys. I used special commando skills (and a press badge) to infiltrate the premises and show you the world&#8217;s freshest, most mind-blowing security tech.<span id="more-368370"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lesslethalgun.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lesslethalgun.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><b>OSA PB2 &#8220;Less-Lethal&#8221; Multipurpose Pistol</b><br />
Ever since I watched Rosa Klebb trying to kill Bond with her shoe-dagger, I considered the Russians the world experts in tiny hideaway weapons. The PB2 is an eeency-weeency little double-barrelled &#8220;less-lethal&#8221; pistol weighing less than 200g, firing anything from rubber bullets to flares to flashbangs. It&#8217;s also got a safety and integral laser sights, which can be upgraded to near&ndash;Scott Summers strength on order. Just don&#8217;t practice on some poor country bumpkin like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaGDtXgN0Eo">they did here</a>. [<a href="http://www.tnwt.ru/">OSA</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/drugtest.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drugtest.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><b>DrugWipe by Securetec</b><br />
The DrugWipe is what makes the customs guys all-knowing. It&#8217;s a tiny drug test in a pocket. These plastic sticks can test up to four classes of illegal drugs in a single go. According to Securetec&#8217;s PR guy, your saliva can give you away 12 hours after doing &mdash; or even just being near &mdash; cocaine, weed, opium, meth or whathaveyou. All the government grunts have to do is wipe your tongue. Won&#8217;t open your mouth? They can also swipe your sweat and random stuff you&#8217;re carrying. [<a href="http://www.securetec.net/cms/front_content.php">Securetec</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/spywatch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_spywatch.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Spy Watch</strong><br />
When I approached the director of a small security/protection company to ask about this normal-looking watch, he wouldn&#8217;t tell me a whole lot. What I managed to squeeze out of him is that although it&#8217;s normal size, it also records audio and video. Near the two o&#8217;clock mark you can see a tiny lens, activated by buttons on the side. He wasn&#8217;t the only cagey guy on the show floor &mdash; the guys in a nearby booth forbade me from taking pictures of their micro surveillance gear.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/trikke.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_trikke.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Trikke uPT</strong><br />
The Trikke uPT (ultralight personal transporter) was the funnest (and funniest) thing at the entire expo, and that&#8217;s saying a lot when you&#8217;re surrounded by a pirateload of guns. It&#8217;s an idea so simple its inventor, the dark-suited Dutchman whizzing around on it, couldn&#8217;t figure why his potential buyers would spend any money at all on the wayyyy more expensive Segways parked in the next booth. The uPT is a trike tricked out with a 250W electric motor and a 35km range lithium-ion battery; it weighs just over 16kg. And like that blasted Segway, there are plenty of models to choose from. [<a href="http://www.trikkeme.net/">Trikke</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/riotbot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_riotbot.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>RiotBot by Technorobot</strong><br />
The RiotBot is billed by its makers as &#8220;the first robot for riot control&#8221;. It uses a PS3-looking remote controller to zip this PepperBall-equipped metal beast at 20km/h into all kinds of riots. The carbine fires at 700 rounds per minute and can be operated for two hours. [<a href="http://technorobot.eu/temp/en/">Technorobot</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/maxfitglove.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_maxfitglove.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>MaxFit Gloves</strong><br />
It&#8217;s usually next to impossible to do precise tasks with gloves on. Most of the time, your hands move around in the gloves, you can&#8217;t feel what you&#8217;re holding and you end up feeling as useless as a eunuch in a whorehouse. But the MaxFit workgloves are fanfriggintastic. They were the thinnest, grippiest workgloves I had ever worn. Their try-out test was having me grip an Armor-All lubed PVC tube, then try to twist it out of my hand &mdash; it didn&#8217;t budge. Unfortunately, though the site advertises that it&#8217;s good for construction, DIYers and backyard work, I couldn&#8217;t help but wonder what ulterior activities they were promoting it for at a security show. [<a href="http://www.maxfitcomfort.com/">MaxFit</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/pepperblaster.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pepperblaster.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Piexon Guardian Angel</strong><br />
The Guardian Angel is a tiny plastic toy that looks like your niece&#8217;s water pistol, but it&#8217;s actually a lightweight, disposable two-shot explosive-propelled pepper-spray gun. The cartridges give it way more range than a spray can. Just don&#8217;t carry it around in Scandinavia or other places where it&#8217;s banned, or they&#8217;ll arrest you for it (like they nearly did with me two months ago). Buy the way, it&#8217;s interesting to note that the Piexon website names &#8220;liberal politics&#8221; as a chief reason for needing more protection these days. [<a href="http://www.piexon.com/">Piexon</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/amphibibot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_amphibibot.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a><strong>Rimmex 288 Prototype Amphibot</strong><br />
The Rimmex 288 is a prototype amphibious robot that can roll straight into water &mdash; streams, rivers and lakes mostly, or just very muddy terrain &mdash; and then roll right back out again. Its single arm with six degrees of freedom can be swapped with whatever you like &mdash; from a gun to an X-ray, apparently, depending on your, uh, objectives. [<a href="http://www.rovdeveloppement.com/">ROV Developpement</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.apoorvaprasad.com/joomla/index.php/articles">Apoorva Prasad</a> is a freelance writer and photographer based in Paris, France, who recently covered the Milipol 2009 military-police expo for us. He has a thing for holo-scoped assault rifles and sounds disappointed when admitting he&#8217;s never been Tased.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/weapons-robots-and-spy-gear-from-the-paris-military-police-expo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo Of Boeing&#8217;s Matrix Laser Destroying An Air Drone</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/photo-of-boeings-matrix-laser-destroying-an-air-drone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/photo-of-boeings-matrix-laser-destroying-an-air-drone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing has successfully tested their new Matrix laser over airborne targets, which is a world first. In total, they shot down five drones at various ranges. That&#8217;s a lot of pew pew in a day.
 The Air Force and Boeing achieved a directed-energy breakthrough with these tests. MATRIX&#8212;Mobile Active Targeting Resource for Integrated eXperiments&#8212;performance is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/boeing-laser-boom.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_boeing-laser-boom.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Boeing has successfully tested their new Matrix laser over airborne targets, which is a world first. In total, they shot down five drones at various ranges. That&#8217;s a lot of pew pew in a day.<span id="more-367813"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> The Air Force and Boeing achieved a directed-energy breakthrough with these tests. MATRIX&mdash;Mobile Active Targeting Resource for Integrated eXperiments&mdash;performance is especially noteworthy because it demonstrated unprecedented, ultra-precise and lethal acquisition, pointing and tracking at long ranges using relatively low laser power.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> I&#8217;m sure that description would get Governor Tarkin wet. Boeing &mdash; along with the Air Force and the Army &mdash; also tested the Laser Avenger, a kinetic-laser hybrid weapon that fires a high power death ray coupled with a 25mm machine gun. </p>
<p>Obviously, the kids in the funny uniforms are happy with their new toys, but I would like to see if they can do the same with a small thermal exhaust port only two metres wide. [<a href="http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&#038;item=941">Boeing</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/boeing-tracks-and-shoots-down-uavs-laser-weapon">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/photo-of-boeings-matrix-laser-destroying-an-air-drone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan Self-Defence Force Sunglasses</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/japan-self-defence-force-sunglasses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/japan-self-defence-force-sunglasses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan trend shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jsdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunglasses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These JSDF shades have apparently been endorsed by the Japanese military because they won&#8217;t fracture even if struck at 170km/h by a 6.5mm-diameter object. Not quite bulletproof, but the picture looks cool.
The Japan Trend Shop also says the 2mm-thick lenses wouldn&#8217;t shatter, even if a 500g shaft of iron is dropped on them from 1.2m. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/jsd1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_jsd1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>These JSDF shades have apparently been endorsed by the Japanese military because they won&#8217;t fracture even if struck at 170km/h by a 6.5mm-diameter object. Not quite bulletproof, but the picture looks cool.<span id="more-367783"></span></p>
<p>The Japan Trend Shop also says the 2mm-thick lenses wouldn&#8217;t shatter, even if a 500g shaft of iron is dropped on them from 1.2m. You know, for those times when you escape the clinches of some evil mastermind at the last minute. I guess I&#8217;ll give them the benefit of the doubt, but it still kinda sounds like they&#8217;re just pulling numbers out of the air.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/jsd2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_jsd2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>If you&#8217;re in the market for a pair of super-rugged glasses, these puppies will only set you back $US317. Yikes. [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/11/can-these-sungl.php">Japan Trend Shop</a> via <a href="http://www.japantrendshop.com/japan-selfdefense-force-sunglasses-p-746.html">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/japan-self-defence-force-sunglasses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Military Wants Armed Bots In Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/us-military-wants-armed-spy-bots-in-intercontinental-ballistic-missiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/us-military-wants-armed-spy-bots-in-intercontinental-ballistic-missiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icbm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy bots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem: The US Army &#8212; purveyors of all things camouflage green &#8212; thinks that spy planes are too slow for recognising remote battlegrounds. The solution: Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles loaded with weaponised spy bots. The side-effect: World War III.
See, the US Army is right. ICBMs are the fastest way to deploy ISR-Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance-spy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_icbm11.jpg" alt="" class="right" />The problem: The US Army &mdash; purveyors of all things camouflage green &mdash; thinks that spy planes are too slow for recognising remote battlegrounds. The solution: Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles loaded with weaponised spy bots. The side-effect: World War III.<span id="more-367620"></span></p>
<p>See, the US Army is right. ICBMs are the fastest way to deploy ISR-Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance-spy bots. They only take minutes to launch and reach a target anywhere in the world. Loading them with spy bots will provide with access to real-time data about any conflict area, in virtually no time:</p>
<blockquote><p> ISR platforms delivered from missiles can potentially provide battlefield information that is only seconds old when transmitted from long ranges. This information is particularly valuable since it is so current. It provides the potential for striking a very mobile enemy before he has time to alter his position.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> But then, ICBMs usually carry a much dangerous load: nuclear warheads. You can be sure that the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/get-nervous-rusty-soviet-doomsday-system-still-turned-on/">the Russians &mdash; or the Chinese or the North Koreans &mdash; won&#8217;t be happy</a> about detecting an ICBM launch off Alaska. That&#8217;s exactly the reason why other similar efforts pioneered by Darpa were scrapped. The US Army boffins, however, say they have a plan to avoid the confusion: Use a different kind of ICBM.</p>
<p>How different that missile could be? A ballistic missile is a ballistic missile. They follow a trajectory across oceans and continents to open and drop whatever load they have, being that nukes, spy bots or cotton candy. Then, the Army also says that they want the spy bots to be fully armed, just in case they want to strike seconds after they find the enemy.</p>
<p>See, that still doesn&#8217;t sound like a good idea to me. Like the old Russian proverb says: &#8220;If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it&#8217;s a nuclear missile.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/11/army-eyes-missiles-filled-with-flying-spy-bots/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/us-military-wants-armed-spy-bots-in-intercontinental-ballistic-missiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bomb-Proof Wallpaper Is Stronger Than The Wall It Papers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bomb-proof-wallpaper-is-stronger-than-the-wall-it-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bomb-proof-wallpaper-is-stronger-than-the-wall-it-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevlar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallpaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-flex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holy crap, you guys, bomb-proof wallpaper. This stuff is strong enough to keep very heavy flying objects from breaking walls &#8212; in tests, one thin layer was enough to keep a wrecking ball from knocking down a concrete wall.
The X-Flex wallpaper is really a layer of Kevlar-type material, in between sheets of &#8220;elastic polymer wrap&#8221;, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/xflexblast_01.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Holy crap, you guys, bomb-proof wallpaper. This stuff is strong enough to keep very heavy flying objects from breaking walls &mdash; in tests, one thin layer was enough to keep a wrecking ball from knocking down a concrete wall.<span id="more-367465"></span></p>
<p>The X-Flex wallpaper is really a layer of Kevlar-type material, in between sheets of &#8220;elastic polymer wrap&#8221;, which provides both flex and strength so that the projectile doesn&#8217;t knock the wall down. It seems really effective &mdash; check out Pop Sci&#8217;s video <a href="http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/video/video-bombproof-wallpaper-vs-wrecking-ball">here for evidence</a> &mdash; and the US Army is considering using it for bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. It&#8217;s also incredibly easy to attach, being basically a rollable sheet, although I&#8217;m not sure if it can be unattached and reused. Still, its effectiveness is really impressive. [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/product/x-flex-blast-protection-system">Pop Sci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/bomb-proof-wallpaper-is-stronger-than-the-wall-it-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old-Timey Sound Locators Enhanced Hearing In Times Of War</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/old-timey-sound-locators-enhanced-hearing-in-times-of-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/old-timey-sound-locators-enhanced-hearing-in-times-of-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound locators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back before radar, dudes in the military had to rely on their ears to detect incoming enemy planes. So they enhanced them with these flat-out crazy &#8220;sound locators&#8221;. 


[Noise for Airports via NotCot]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back before radar, dudes in the military had to rely on their ears to detect incoming enemy planes. So they enhanced them with these flat-out crazy &#8220;sound locators&#8221;. <span id="more-367210"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/soundlocator1.gif" alt="" class="left" /><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_soundlocator2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_soundlocator3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/soundlocator4.gif" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>[<a href="http://noiseforairports.com/post/243891819/machines-to-enlarge-the-ears">Noise for Airports</a> via <a href="http://www.notcot.org/post/26314/">NotCot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/old-timey-sound-locators-enhanced-hearing-in-times-of-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan Developing Its Own Stealth Fighter Jet</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/japan-developing-its-own-stealth-fighter-jet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/japan-developing-its-own-stealth-fighter-jet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shinshin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shinshin atd-x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth fighters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is the Shinshin ATD-X, the prototype of what could be Japan&#8217;s very own stealth fighter if they don&#8217;t get to buy Lockheed Martin F-22s. It&#8217;s very sleek, but I&#8217;m sad it doesn&#8217;t transform like a Varitech.
The Japanese military seems to be very happy about it, although it&#8217;s not clear it will ever pass the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/495b5SVXJUA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/495b5SVXJUA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="360" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>This is the Shinshin ATD-X, the prototype of what could be Japan&#8217;s very own stealth fighter if they don&#8217;t get to buy Lockheed Martin F-22s. It&#8217;s very sleek, but I&#8217;m sad it doesn&#8217;t transform like a Varitech.<span id="more-366956"></span></p>
<p>The Japanese military seems to be very happy about it, although it&#8217;s not clear it will ever pass the prototype test phase. For now, only a full scale mockup for radar profiling &mdash; it appears as a group of insects or a bird, they say &mdash; and a RC model have been built. [<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/11/video-japan-tv-profiles-shinsh.html">Flight Global</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/japan-developing-its-own-stealth-fighter-jet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Army Rail Gun Fires For The First Time</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/us-army-rail-gun-fires-for-the-first-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/us-army-rail-gun-fires-for-the-first-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to be less than the US Navy, the Army has tested their own electromagnetic rail gun, firing several times at Dugway Proving Grounds. Manufacturer General Atomics calls it Blitzer. I call it Hey Enemy Tank, You Have Been Blended.
Blitzer will continue testing through 2010, until they fire &#8220;tactically relevant aerodynamic rounds&#8221;. That means shells [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/blitzer-railgun-shot-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_blitzer-railgun-shot-2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Not to be less than <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/navy_rail_gun_test_destroys_everything_it_touches_at_5640_mph-2/">the US Navy</a>, the Army has tested their own electromagnetic rail gun, firing several times at Dugway Proving Grounds. Manufacturer General Atomics calls it Blitzer. I call it Hey Enemy Tank, You Have Been Blended.<span id="more-366300"></span></p>
<p>Blitzer will continue testing through 2010, until they fire &#8220;tactically relevant aerodynamic rounds&#8221;. That means shells designed to obliterate enemy tanks, bunkers and anything that moves on the ground. Looking at it, I can&#8217;t help but to think on Cowboy Bebop and Spike&#8217;s Swordfish II fighter. Just imagine General Atomics mounting an optimised model in an oversized version of their Reapers. [<a href="http://www.ga.com/news.php?read=1&#038;id=275">General Atomics</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/kaboom-railgun-completes-first-successful-test-firing">Popsci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/us-army-rail-gun-fires-for-the-first-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bomb-Sniffing Gadget That&#8217;s (Definitely Not) Saving Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-bomb-sniffing-gadget-thats-definitely-not-saving-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-bomb-sniffing-gadget-thats-definitely-not-saving-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ade 651]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The promise of the ADE 651 is seductive: a handheld detector which susses out bombs, guns, drugs and human bodies from up to a kilometre away. And the Iraqi military swears by it! One problem: It doesn&#8217;t seem to work.
To be able to instantly detect contraband like this would be a game-changer in Iraq, where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-04_at_9.05.19_AM.jpg" alt="" class="right" />The promise of the ADE 651 is seductive: a handheld detector which susses out bombs, guns, drugs and human bodies from up to a kilometre away. And the Iraqi military swears by it! One problem: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp">It doesn&#8217;t seem to work</a>.<span id="more-364677"></span></p>
<p>To be able to instantly detect contraband like this would be a game-changer in Iraq, where the (effectively) free transit of roadside bombs and IEDs is a constant threat, so the Iraqi government is willing to pay a premium for devices that promise as much &mdash; they&#8217;ve already bought 1500 of the detectors at a price of $US16,500 to $US60,000 each. Despite the steep price and fierce user loyalty though, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp">US government officials say</a> the devices don&#8217;t work <em>at all</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p> Dale Murray, head of the National Explosive Engineering Sciences Security centre at Sandia Labs, which does testing for the Department of defence, said the centre had &#8220;tested several devices in this category, and none have ever performed better than random chance.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Capital &#8220;S&#8221; Sceptical organisations like the James Randi Educational Foundation have <a href="http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/231-a-direct-specific-challenge-from-james-randi-and-the-jref.html">joined the cause</a> too, flagging the ADE 651&#8217;s manufacturer&#8217;s claims that the device works with spooky-sounding &#8220;electrostatic magnetic ion attraction&#8221; and offering a (rhetorical) bounty to anyone who can prove they actually work.</p>
<p>ATSC, the company that manufactures the device out of the UK, wouldn&#8217;t even talk to the <em>New York Times</em>, cementing an already obvious conclusion: This is a case of a bogus company taking advantage of credulous, vulnerable consumers by selling a device that <em>seems</em> like it works by virtue of being many users&#8217; <em>only means of bomb detection</em>, meaning that they never notice when it doesn&#8217;t work &mdash; it&#8217;s just another car passing through a checkpoint; who knows if the bombing later that afternoon had anything to do with it!&mdash; and always notice when it does, even if by pure chance.</p>
<p>You may have failed miserably at designing a universal contraband detector, ATSC, but hey, at least your scam was well engineered. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=2&amp;hp">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-bomb-sniffing-gadget-thats-definitely-not-saving-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
