<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; memory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Atom Processor To Get The 32nm Treatment In 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atom-processor-to-get-the-32nm-treatment-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atom-processor-to-get-the-32nm-treatment-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedar trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedarview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention, people who like to maintain a complete mental taxonomy of every processor: Cedar Trail has been outed as the new Atom platform for 2011, with the name Cedarview going to the processor itself. Along with 32nm fabrication, some goodies:
According to Fudzilla, the platform will include a new memory controller to accommodate DDR3 RAM which, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_intel-atom.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Attention, people who like to maintain a complete mental taxonomy of every processor: Cedar Trail has been outed as the new Atom platform for 2011, with the name Cedarview going to the processor itself. Along with 32nm fabrication, some goodies:<span id="more-368389"></span></p>
<p>According to Fudzilla, the platform will include a new memory controller to accommodate DDR3 RAM which, despite supporting two slots, will remain single-channel. Pineview, the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-select-intel-atom-cpu-netbooks-to-be-allowed-2gb-ram/">next Atom</a> before Cedarview, hasn&#8217;t even shipped yet &mdash; that&#8217;s expected to be the beginning of next year &mdash; so it&#8217;s interesting to glimpse this far into the future, where Atom, such as it is, will remain positioned almost <em>exactly</em> where it is now. Oh well! [<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16512/41/">Fudzilla</a>]</p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: That Atom sitting on the penny up there is an older version (not that the new one will look any different).</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atom-processor-to-get-the-32nm-treatment-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s New Flash Memory Chips Will Cause Gadget Shrinkage</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/samsungs-new-flash-memory-chips-will-cause-gadget-shrinkage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/samsungs-new-flash-memory-chips-will-cause-gadget-shrinkage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a thickness of only 0.6mm, Samsung&#8217;s newest NAND chips are practically anorexic, but for once that&#8217;s a good thing. Thinner chips like these could bring smaller gadgets and hopefully also lead to lower SSD prices.
According to Samsung, their new chips are actually the slimmest ever and 40 per cent thinner and lighter than a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/samsungchips.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_samsungchips.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>With a thickness of only 0.6mm, Samsung&#8217;s newest NAND chips are practically anorexic, but for once that&#8217;s a good thing. Thinner chips like these could bring smaller gadgets and hopefully also lead to lower SSD prices.<span id="more-365167"></span></p>
<p>According to Samsung, their new chips are actually <i>the</i> slimmest ever and 40 per cent thinner and lighter than a conventional memory package. Whether those details are true or not, I look forward to seeing them hit the market and start slipping into newer, smaller gadgets. [<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/processors/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221600353&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All">Information Week</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/06/samsung-slims-down-nand-memory-packaging-wafer-thin-gadgets-to/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/samsungs-new-flash-memory-chips-will-cause-gadget-shrinkage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phase-Changing Memory Is Closer To Market And Might Just Kill Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/phase-changing-memory-is-closer-to-market-might-just-kill-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/phase-changing-memory-is-closer-to-market-might-just-kill-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numonyx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phase-changing memory looks great. It&#8217;s supposed to combine the non-volatile nature of flash-based memory with the fantastic speed of DRAM. Now Intel and Numonyx are teasing with advancements in stacking memory layers, news that brings denser PCM closer to markets.
It&#8217;s anticipated that PCM will initially be considered too pricey once it does in fact become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/memory_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Phase-changing memory looks great. It&#8217;s supposed to combine the non-volatile nature of flash-based memory with the fantastic speed of DRAM. Now Intel and Numonyx are teasing with advancements in stacking memory layers, news that brings denser PCM closer to markets.<span id="more-363830"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s anticipated that PCM will initially be considered too pricey once it does in fact become available to consumers, but what product doesn&#8217;t start off like that? Once prices level out and potential issues are sorted out though, it&#8217;s predicted that phase-changing memory will kill off flash. Makes sense, since there&#8217;s no reason to settle for a less dense product when you could have stacks of memory that&#8217;s just as non-volatile after all. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/10/intel-and-numonyx-announce-stackable-phase-change-memory.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/phase-changing-memory-is-closer-to-market-might-just-kill-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corsair Flash Voyager 128GB USB: As Big And Fast As A Small Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/corsair-flash-voyager-usb-drive-128gb-as-big-and-fast-as-a-small-fish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/corsair-flash-voyager-usb-drive-128gb-as-big-and-fast-as-a-small-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[128gb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corsair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash voyager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One day, 128GB flash drives will be common. We&#8217;ll lose em and only say &#8220;oops&#8221;. Today, you can have one if you don&#8217;t mind the size and price of this $US400 Corsair. But F me, this thing isn&#8217;t fast.
Speed
I&#8217;ve been happy with a 16GB Patriot Xporter, which Ars mentioned in their 2009 test as one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_corsairflashvoyager128_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" />One day, 128GB flash drives will be common. We&#8217;ll lose em and only say &#8220;oops&#8221;. Today, you can have one if you don&#8217;t mind the size and price of this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/corsairs-flash-voyager-gt-the-worlds-fastest-128gb-usb-flash-drive/">$US400 Corsair</a>. But F me, this thing isn&#8217;t fast.<span id="more-363846"></span></p>
<h3>Speed</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve been happy with a 16GB Patriot Xporter, which <a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/05/usb-flash-drive-roundup.ars/5">Ars</a> mentioned in their 2009 test as <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/whats_the_best_usb_flash_drive-2/">one of the fastest</a>. This Corsair is faster. On an informal test transferring 2.7 GB of MP3 files, the Corsair Flash Voyager 128GB was twice as fast in writes and a touch faster in reads.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-29_at_5.18.45_PM.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Screen_shot_2009-10-29_at_5.18.45_PM.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Note I was very casual about this test. It did not shut down all my other apps during this test, but I did run multiple trials. And I did not test random access or exceptionally large file sizes. Why didn&#8217;t I take testing more seriously? Because I just don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll really buy this thing when you can get multiple 32GB drives for $US50 or so. This thing is impressive, but <em>all</em> freaks of nature are impressive.</p>
<h3>It&#8217;s Big</h3>
<p>On top of its price and performance, it&#8217;s bigger. No, not only in capacity. See?</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_corsairflashvoyager1282.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/c8/gallery_corsairflashvoyager1282.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><A href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_corsairflashvoyager1284.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/62/gallery_corsairflashvoyager1284.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>Yeah, well, it still fits in my pocket. Like a giant pet beetle. The kind that crawled out of skulls and pyramid labyrinth walls in <em>The Mummy</em>, part five, or whatever.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend it only if you have so much money that if you lose one, you&#8217;ll merely say &#8220;oops&#8221; and not cry over it like I would.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg" alt="" class="left" />128GB is a lot of space.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg" alt="" class="left" />It&#8217;s fast.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Kind of big for a USB drive, but still doable.<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Expensive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/corsair-flash-voyager-usb-drive-128gb-as-big-and-fast-as-a-small-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SanDisk Starts Shipping X4 Flash Cards, Will Eventually Be Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sandisk-starts-shipping-x4-flash-cards-will-eventually-be-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sandisk-starts-shipping-x4-flash-cards-will-eventually-be-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SanDisk&#8217;s X4 tech packs four bits of data into each memory cell, compared with the typical one or two bits. That means they&#8217;ll be able to far exceed the 32GB limit on SDHC, microSDHC and others, and they&#8217;ve started shipping.
Right now, they&#8217;re only shipping in 8GB and 16GB capacities, which have been long available, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/thumb160x_sandisk-x4-memory-chip.jpg" alt="" class="left" />SanDisk&#8217;s X4 tech packs four bits of data into each memory cell, compared with the typical one or two bits. That means they&#8217;ll be able to far exceed the 32GB limit on SDHC, microSDHC and others, and they&#8217;ve started shipping.<span id="more-359945"></span></p>
<p>Right now, they&#8217;re only shipping in 8GB and 16GB capacities, which have been long available, but soon they&#8217;ll be releasing 64GB and even higher flash memory. The X4 tech doesn&#8217;t yet extend to SSDs, though it&#8217;s not really clear why, but it&#8217;s still great news for us gadget hounds. Many smartphones, especially those running Android, WinMo and BlackBerry OS, rely on microSDHC cards for memory, and a 64GB or even higher capacity card would make those much more viable as, say, multimedia machines. SanDisk assures us that the price will not skyrocket, which is a relief. X4 chips should start appearing in stores very soon. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10373646-64.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sandisk-starts-shipping-x4-flash-cards-will-eventually-be-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash Memory Sensors: 100x Smaller Than CCDs, Better At Low Light</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/flash-memory-sensors-100x-smaller-than-ccds-better-at-low-light/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/flash-memory-sensors-100x-smaller-than-ccds-better-at-low-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CCD and CMOS sensors take great images, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re perfect. They&#8217;re bulky and bad in low light. It turns out that flash memory can actually double as a light sensor, and could solve both these problems.
Apparently, flash memory cells are highly receptive to light and capable of creating a completely digital image. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/6562865_7cd5cc3b85_b-660x535_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_6562865_7cd5cc3b85_b-660x535_01.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>CCD and CMOS sensors take great images, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re perfect. They&#8217;re bulky and bad in low light. It turns out that flash memory can actually double as a light sensor, and could solve both these problems.<span id="more-359266"></span></p>
<p>Apparently, flash memory cells are highly receptive to light and capable of creating a completely digital image. A focused beam of light directed at sector on the chip becomes a pixel, no analog-to-digital conversion required. Flash memory sensors are up to 100x smaller than current CCDs, too. By my math, that means I could have a 200MP phone camera in my pocket right now.</p>
<p>The drawback: Small pixels are less receptive to light, which could mean problems as pixel density increases. The data also only comes in as 1s or 0s, so grayscale is tricky. Regardless, the researchers are already achieving better grayscale and low-light performance than seen in CMOS sensors.</p>
<p>Edoardo Charbon and the rest of the team at the Technical University of Delft hope to have a working prototype by 2010. We&#8217;re still waiting for response from Canon on the rumoured, memory-sensor-based D40 Pico. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/10/memory-chip-based-camera-sensors-are-100-times-smaller-than-ccds/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/flash-memory-sensors-100x-smaller-than-ccds-better-at-low-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bluetooth Headset Hides Super Ultra Secret MicroSD Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/bluetooth-headset-hides-super-ultra-secret-microsd-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/bluetooth-headset-hides-super-ultra-secret-microsd-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you never grew up to hide lasers, explosives and gadgets in every known orifice like James Bond. But maybe you&#8217;d find a microSDHC reader in your Bluetooth headset to be handy. And that dream is only $US40 away. [Brando]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/bter.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_bter.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>So you never grew up to hide lasers, explosives and gadgets in every known orifice like James Bond. But maybe you&#8217;d find a microSDHC reader in your Bluetooth headset to be handy. And that dream is only $US40 away. [<a href="http://mobile.brando.com/simplified-bluetooth-headset-card-reader-usb-charging_p04596c0774d094.html">Brando</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/bluetooth-headset-hides-super-ultra-secret-microsd-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninja Kunai Flash Drive Guarantees Airport Full Cavity Search</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/ninja-kunai-flash-drive-guarantees-airport-security-full-cavity-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/ninja-kunai-flash-drive-guarantees-airport-security-full-cavity-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninja]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninja knife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninja kunai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know if this $US125 Ninja Kunai 2GB flash memory drive is made of metal or not. They don&#8217;t say in the product page description. What they say in the warning has me a bit worried, though:
 Please note that this product is not a &#8220;real&#8217; Kunai, and cannot be used as such, also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/090917kamui1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_090917kamui1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I don&#8217;t know if this $US125 Ninja Kunai 2GB flash memory drive is made of metal or not. They don&#8217;t say in the product page description. What they say in the warning has me a bit worried, though:<span id="more-355309"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Please note that this product is not a &#8220;real&#8217; Kunai, and cannot be used as such, also we would like to remind you that this product may be dangerous due to its sharp edge and MUST be handle with care,</p>
<p>GeekStuff4U.com cannot be responsible if you misused this product and hurt yourself or others with it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> So it is <i>not</i> the real thing but it can actually cut? Can I take care of my garden with it? Do they just mean you can use it to take one of your eyes out? Are they giving nerd ninja wannabes any kind of ideas here? I hate when the day comes with so many questions. [<a href="http://www.geekstuff4u.com/ninja-kunai-usb-memory-2gb.html">Geek Stuff 4 U</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/ninja-kunai-flash-drive-guarantees-airport-security-full-cavity-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SanDisk ExtremePro Cards Are Extremely Fast, Extremely Expensive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sandisk-extremepro-cards-are-extremely-fast-extremely-expensive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sandisk-extremepro-cards-are-extremely-fast-extremely-expensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compactflash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extremepro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk extremepro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best $US50 I&#8217;ve spent in a month was on a roomier CompactFlash card for video-taking DSLRs, but it looks like I should&#8217;ve waited: SanDisk&#8217;s new ExtremePro line push 90MB/second read/write speeds and comes in 16, 32 and 64GB sizes.
All that speed is expensive: The ExtremePro cards start at $US300. If you want a card [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sandiskextremepro.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_sandiskextremepro.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The best $US50 I&#8217;ve spent in a month was on a roomier CompactFlash card for video-taking DSLRs, but it looks like I should&#8217;ve waited: SanDisk&#8217;s new ExtremePro line push 90MB/second read/write speeds and comes in 16, 32 and 64GB sizes.<span id="more-353348"></span></p>
<p>All that speed is expensive: The ExtremePro cards <em>start</em> at $US300. If you want a card that&#8217;s still damn quick but less pricey, SanDisk also has the new SanDisk extreme, which read/writes at 60MB/second and comes in 8, 16 and 32GB sizes, starting at a more manageable $US130.</p>
<blockquote><p> SANDISK EXTREME PRO COMPACTFLASH MEMORY CARD RAISES BAR FOR PROFESSIONAL GRADE PERFORMANCE, CAPACITY AND RELIABILITY</p>
<p>World&#8217;s Fastest High-Capacity Memory Card Features SanDisk<br />
Power Core Controller That Optimizes Card Endurance and<br />
Boosts Read/Write Speed to up to 90MB/s</p>
<p>Milpitas, Calif., Sept. 14, 2009 – SanDisk Corporation (NASDAQ: SNDK), the global leader in flash memory cards, today introduced a new line of SanDisk Extreme® Pro™ CompactFlash® memory cards (http://tinyurl.com/mdjlmm), setting a new standard for fast, reliable, high-capacity memory cards designed for professional photographers. SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards feature a new SanDisk® Power Core Controller™, an advanced memory controller that enables lightning-fast read and write speeds of up to 90MB/s1, doubling the performance from previous SanDisk high-end camera memory cards. The cards are shipping worldwide now with storage capacities ranging from 16 gigabytes (GB)2 to 64GB.</p>
<p>&#8220;The new SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash line is the direct result of SanDisk&#8217;s passion, commitment, and break-through engineering innovation to provide best-in-class flash memory cards for professional photography,&#8221; said Eric Bone, vice president, retail product marketing, SanDisk. &#8220;The SanDisk Power Core Controller delivers unmatched write speed and reliability, providing photographers with a spectacular combination of performance, capacity and peace of mind that images are safely stored.&#8221;</p>
<p>SanDisk develops its flash controllers and memory chips together, allowing the company to perfectly match and fine-tune the two technologies throughout the testing process, resulting in high-performance products with industry-leading endurance. The SanDisk Power Core Controller brings numerous benefits to the SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards, including:</p>
<p>High-Performance: The SanDisk® Power Core™ Controller&#8217;s dual-lane architecture and software algorithms double card performance, enabling the SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards&#8217; read/write speeds of up to 90MB/s over a UDMA-6 bus.</p>
<p>Increased Reliability: The SanDisk Power Core Controller&#8217;s firmware algorithms and 42-bit ECC engine maintain data integrity and extended card endurance through optimised wear leveling.</p>
<p>Simplified Design: To further increase overall card durability, the SanDisk Power Core Controller features an integrated design that requires fewer individual components on the card&#8217;s printed circuit board.</p>
<p>Professional-Grade Memory:<br />
Faster read and write speeds mean more opportunities to capture the winning shot and less time spent offloading gigabytes of photos afterwards. Large storage capacity enables photographers to capture RAW format images and high-definition video clips in a single session without running out of space.</p>
<p>This unique combination of speed and capacity makes the new line of cards well suited for professional usage models involving large amounts of data and tight deadlines. The SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards&#8217; 16 to 64GB capacity range offers the storage space needed to allow extended shooting sessions without having to reload.</p>
<p>&#8220;As a professional sports photographer, I rely on a speedy camera and high-performance SanDisk Extreme Pro cards to capture as many images as possible within a few seconds using continuous burst mode,&#8221; says Jeff Lewis, professional photographer and member of the SanDisk Extreme Team (http://tinyurl.com/kv7w6n). &#8220;How fast you can download and edit images from the cards makes a big difference when it comes to getting sports images distributed. The first images out of the media room tend to be the ones that get picked up. Speed really counts for getting selected by the top photo editors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Renowned for their world-class durability, SanDisk Extreme cards guarantee operation at extended temperatures ranging from minus 13 F (minus 25 C) to 185 F (85 C). SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards feature RTV Silicone coating for added protection against moisture and humidity. The cards can withstand accidental drops of up to nine feet, and carry a lifetime limited warranty.3</p>
<p>SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards are fully compatible with any camera, card reader or other device that supports CompactFlash cards.4 The SanDisk Extreme Pro ExpressCard™ adaptor is optimised to take advantage of the SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash card&#8217;s up to 90MB/s read speed. The reader carries an MSRP of $US49.99 and will be available in late October on SanDisk.com and at select retailers.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability<br />
SanDisk is also introducing new SanDisk Extreme CompactFlash cards (http://tinyurl.com/mdjlmm) at increased performance of previous SanDisk Extreme III CompactFlash cards. The new SanDisk Extreme and SanDisk Extreme Pro cards represent the step beyond SanDisk Extreme III and SanDisk Extreme IV cards, respectively.</p>
<p>SanDisk Extreme CompactFlash cards will be available in capacities of 8GB to 32GB and MSRP ranging from about $US130 to $US375 in the US market, while SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash cards will be available in capacities of 16GB to 64GB and MSRP ranging from about $US300 to $US800 in the US market. Exact pricing for the cards will be set by retailers.</p>
<p>CompactFlash Card Line: SanDisk Extreme<br />
Performance1: 60MB/s read/write speed (400x)<br />
Available Capacity2: 8GB, 16GB, 32GB</p>
<p>CompactFlash Card Line: SanDisk Extreme Pro<br />
Performance: 90MB/s read/write speed (600x)<br />
Available Capacity: 16GB, 32GB, 64GB</p>
<p>About SanDisk<br />
SanDisk Corporation is the global leader in flash memory cards, from research, manufacturing and product design to consumer branding and retail distribution. SanDisk&#8217;s product portfolio includes flash memory cards for mobile phones, digital cameras and camcorders; digital audio/video players; USB flash drives for consumers and the enterprise; embedded memory for mobile devices; and solid state drives for computers. SanDisk is a Silicon Valley-based S&amp;P 500 company, with more than half its sales outside the United States.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> [<a href="http://www.sandisk.com">SanDisk</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sandisk-extremepro-cards-are-extremely-fast-extremely-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Increases Memory Stick Pro Duo Capacity To 32GB</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/sony-increases-memory-stick-pro-duo-capacity-to-32gb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/sony-increases-memory-stick-pro-duo-capacity-to-32gb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro duo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shortly after giving the Pro-HG Duo a similar treatment, Sony has gone and bumped up the capacity of the Pro Duo to 32GB. For those of you keeping track, that equates to around 225 minutes in full HD mode for Handycam owners. Cyber-Shot users can also get 29 minute clips in 720p. [CrunchGear]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_memory-stick-pro-duo-32-gb.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Shortly after giving the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/sony-squirts-out-memory-stick-pro-hg-duo-at-32gb/">Pro-HG Duo</a> a similar treatment, Sony has gone and bumped up the capacity of the Pro Duo to 32GB. For those of you keeping track, that equates to around 225 minutes in full HD mode for Handycam owners. Cyber-Shot users can also get 29 minute clips in 720p. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/08/21/sony-bumps-the-memory-stick-pro-duo-capacity-up-to-32gb/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/sony-increases-memory-stick-pro-duo-capacity-to-32gb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
