<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; malware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/malware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oh Shit: New Viruses Download Child Porn Onto Your Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/oh-shit-new-viruses-download-child-porn-onto-your-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/oh-shit-new-viruses-download-child-porn-onto-your-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting a virus that uses your computer to send out spam without your knowledge is bad. Getting a virus that hides kiddie porn on your computer is much, much worse.
Apparently, paedophiles have started using viruses to hide their vile stash on strangers computers. And guess what? Nobody believes that it was a virus that put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_catchapredator.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Getting a virus that uses your computer to send out spam without your knowledge is bad. Getting a virus that hides kiddie porn on your computer is much, much worse.<span id="more-365993"></span></p>
<p>Apparently, paedophiles have started using viruses to hide their vile stash on strangers computers. And guess what? Nobody believes that it was a virus that put them there when those pictures are found.</p>
<p>People have ended up going to jail because the exams that courts do on your computer are so expensive, judges don&#8217;t like paying for them. And people have gone broke clearing their names.</p>
<p>The moral of the story? Use virus-protection software, and don&#8217;t go to shady sites on the web. Because, yikes. [<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=9028516">ABCNews</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/oh-shit-new-viruses-download-child-porn-onto-your-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard Has Hidden Antivirus Talents</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/snow-leopard-has-hidden-antivirus-talents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/snow-leopard-has-hidden-antivirus-talents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this is int-er-est-ing: Early testers have come across what looks like a new antivirus function within Snow Leopard. Or to put it another way, Macs don&#8217;t need antivirus! Wait.
The new feature behaves a cross between a traditional antivirus tool and the &#8220;Are you sure you want to open this?&#8221; warnings already present in Leopard. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/snowav.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_snowav.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Well, this is int-er-est-ing: Early testers have come across what looks like a new antivirus function within Snow Leopard. Or to put it another way, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/giz_explains_why_os_x_shrugs_off_viruses_better_than_windows-2/">Macs don&#8217;t need antivirus</a>! Wait.<span id="more-348827"></span></p>
<p>The new feature behaves a cross between a traditional antivirus tool and the &#8220;<a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9957307">Are you <em>sure</em> you want to open this</a>?&#8221; warnings already present in Leopard. I doubt it&#8217;s doing any real-time heuristic scanning and it&#8217;s definitely not running as a visible app in the OS, but if it&#8217;s checking .PKG and .DMG files for malware before you run or mount them, well, that sounds an <em>awful lot</em> like what your average Symantec, AVG or Kapersky product is intended to do.</p>
<p>The first report came from The Mac Security Blog, and it&#8217;s been <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=768932">corroborated</a> by Snow Leopard testers over at the MacRumors forums. We&#8217;ll try to test this one out as best we can, but it&#8217;s looking like Apple may have slipped this slightly unflattering feature into their new OS, stealth-style. [<a href="http://blog.intego.com/2009/08/25/snow-leopard-contains-an-antivirus/">The Mac Security Blog</a>, <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=768932">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/snow-leopard-has-hidden-antivirus-talents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop Lojack Vulnerability Exposed, Affects 60% Of New Notebooks</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/laptop-lojack-vulnerability-exposed-affecting-60-percent-of-new-notebooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/laptop-lojack-vulnerability-exposed-affecting-60-percent-of-new-notebooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop lojack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop lojack vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=343546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pair of computer security researchers have discovered a BIOS vulnerability caused by the Computrace Laptop Lojack software, serving as a rootkit to potentially let malware nest and thrive in an estimated 60% of newish laptops.
The research team of Alfredo Ortega and Anibal Sacco say that when malware infects a system BIOS, it is able [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pair of computer security researchers have discovered a BIOS vulnerability caused by the Computrace Laptop Lojack software, serving as a rootkit to potentially let <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3828">malware nest and thrive</a> in an estimated 60% of newish laptops.<span id="more-343546"></span></p>
<p>The research team of Alfredo Ortega and Anibal Sacco say that when malware infects a system BIOS, it is able to survive multiple attempts to reflash the core software, and extremely difficult to get rid of. Even worse, because Lojack is white listed by virus and malware scanners, any attacks exploiting this vulnerability on a computer will largely go undetected. And for Laptop Lojack to be effective, it must operate like a stealthy rootkit. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s installed in the majority of new notebooks from HP, Asus, Dell, Lenovo and Toshiba.</p>
<p>Moral of the story: find a new way to get your stolen laptop back. [<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3828">ZDnet </a>via <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/31/1337202/BIOS-Rootkit-Preloaded-In-60-of-New-Laptops?art_pos=11">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/laptop-lojack-vulnerability-exposed-affecting-60-percent-of-new-notebooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Offering Free AVG Subscription To Mobile Broadband Customers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/three-offering-free-avg-subscription-to-mobile-broadband-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/three-offering-free-avg-subscription-to-mobile-broadband-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internets can be dangerous, which is why Three has partnered with anti-virus software company AVG to offer a free 12 month subscription to all of its mobile broadband customers.
The great thing about this offer is that it&#8217;s not just for new customers – any 3 Broadband customer can log on and register for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/06/three-avg-security-offer-600x305.png" alt="three-avg-security-offer" title="three-avg-security-offer" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-339839" />The Internets can be dangerous, which is why Three has partnered with anti-virus software company AVG to offer a free 12 month subscription to all of its mobile broadband customers.<span id="more-339837"></span></p>
<p>The great thing about this offer is that it&#8217;s not just for new customers – any 3 Broadband customer can log on and register for the free download of the AVG Internet Security software suite. After the initial 12 months, customers are given the chance to renew their subscription, which is obviously the incentive for AVG here.</p>
<p>As more people jump on the mobile broadband bandwagon, having decent security would probably help cut down on tech support calls to Three as well, so it&#8217;s a win-win-win scenario. It&#8217;s actually surprising that we haven&#8217;t seen a similar offer earlier.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.three.com.au/internetsecurity">Three Internet Security</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/three-offering-free-avg-subscription-to-mobile-broadband-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conficker Worm Hits U.S. Hospitals, Infecting Computers and Equipment</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/conficker_worm_hits_us_hospitals_infecting_computers_and_equipment-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/conficker_worm_hits_us_hospitals_infecting_computers_and_equipment-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/conficker_worm_hits_us_hospitals_infecting_computers_and_equipment-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Cnet says that hundreds of critical hospital devices across the U.S. have been infected by the Conficker worm. The number of hospitals affected wasn&#8217;t disclosed, but the problem isn&#8217;t thought to be widespread.


Cybersecurity expert Marcus Sachs broke the news at a security conference in San Francisco, raising the question of what would happen if this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/04/custom_1241134390897_coficker_over_01.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Cnet says that hundreds of critical hospital devices across the U.S. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10226448-83.html">have been infected</a> by the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/conficker">Conficker worm</a>. The number of hospitals affected wasn&#8217;t disclosed, but the problem isn&#8217;t thought to be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/conficker_is_not_happening_ignore_conficker-2.html">widespread</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: viruses, computers, conficker, conficker virus, conficker worm, conficker worm hospitals, pcs, security, windows, worms --><br />
<span id="more-335217"></span>
<p>Cybersecurity expert Marcus Sachs broke the news at a security conference in San Francisco, raising the question of what would happen if this were to happen to millions of machines in the medical industry. According to sachs, the devices affected were hospital computers and devices used to control critical equipment, such as heart monitors and MRI machines.</p>
<p>No one is quite sure how the computers acquired the worms to begin with, but most of the Windows 2000/NT machines were to old to benefit from Microsoft&#8217;s October patch which fixed many of the vulnerabilities Conficker preyed on. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10226448-83.html">Cnet</a> via <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/30/2127211">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/conficker_worm_hits_us_hospitals_infecting_computers_and_equipment-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lifehacker Lists Top User-Submitted Malware Removers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lifehacker_lists_top_usersubmitted_malware_removers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lifehacker_lists_top_usersubmitted_malware_removers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lifehacker_lists_top_usersubmitted_malware_removers-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This list of malware removal software arrived too late to save Adam Frucci, but perhaps it can help you. Fun fact: This list of five tools was submitted to Lifehacker by Users Like You. [Lifehacker]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list of <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/five-best-malware-removal-tools/">malware removal software</a> arrived too late to save Adam Frucci, but perhaps it can help you. Fun fact: This list of five tools was submitted to Lifehacker by Users Like You. [<a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/five-best-malware-removal-tools/">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: malware, malware removal, tools --><br />
<span id="more-334978"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/lifehacker_lists_top_usersubmitted_malware_removers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec Finds First Mac Botnet, Already Launching DDoS Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/symantec_finds_first_mac_botnet_already_launching_ddos_attacks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/symantec_finds_first_mac_botnet_already_launching_ddos_attacks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/symantec_finds_first_mac_botnet_already_launching_ddos_attacks-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Mac botnet is already launching DDoS attacks against some website, which penetrated Macs via tainted copies of iWork &#8216;09 and Photoshop CS4. Just like what we told you about in January. Be careful when you pirate stuff. [ZDNet via NYT]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first Mac botnet is already launching DDoS attacks against some website, which penetrated Macs via tainted copies of iWork &#8216;09 and Photoshop CS4. Just like <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/os_x_iwork_trojan_revamped_repackaged_rereleased_in_photoshop-2.html">what we told you about in January</a>. Be careful when you <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/im_a_pirate-2.html">pirate stuff</a>. [<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3157">ZDNet</a> via <a href="http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/mac-security-iii-the-rise-of-the-botnets/?hp">NYT</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: botnet, apple, botnet trojan, first mac botnet, mac, os x, trojan, virus --><br />
<span id="more-334458"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/symantec_finds_first_mac_botnet_already_launching_ddos_attacks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conficker Worm Claims High Profile Victim: University of Utah</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/conficker_worm_claims_high_profile_victim_university_of_utah-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/conficker_worm_claims_high_profile_victim_university_of_utah-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/conficker_worm_claims_high_profile_victim_university_of_utah-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 700 med school computers at the University of Utah have fallen victim to the infamous Conficker worm. Gizmodo, we swear, had absolutely nothing to do with it. [AP via CNET]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 700 med school computers at the University of Utah have fallen victim to the infamous Conficker worm. Gizmodo, we swear, had absolutely nothing to do with it. [<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5glHoytrRzwnvGp8sAaLo7L4skvowD97GPM6G0">AP</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10217683-83.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: conficker, malware, university of utah, utah, virus, worm --><br />
<span id="more-333837"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/conficker_worm_claims_high_profile_victim_university_of_utah-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New PC Badges Help Us With our Conficker Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/new_pc_badges_help_us_with_our_conficker_decision-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/new_pc_badges_help_us_with_our_conficker_decision-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[badges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/new_pc_badges_help_us_with_our_conficker_decision-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Italo, for mocking up these new PC badges. It&#8217;ll really help us decide which model to buy with our $US1500.


p.s. Relax people! It&#8217;s just a joke. [Thanks Italo!]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/ConfickerReadyBadges.jpg" alt="" />Thanks, Italo, for mocking up these new PC badges. It&#8217;ll really help us decide which model to buy with our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/third_windows_laptop_hunter_ad_picks_a_sony_vaio_instead_of_a_mac_obviously-2.html">$US1500</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: badges, conficker, conficker ready, pc badges, virus --><br />
<span id="more-333736"></span>
<p>p.s. Relax people! It&#8217;s just a joke. [<i>Thanks Italo!</i>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/new_pc_badges_help_us_with_our_conficker_decision-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conficker Virus Scams You $US50 To Remove It</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_conficker_virus_scams_you_50_to_remove_it-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_conficker_virus_scams_you_50_to_remove_it-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Ho</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_conficker_virus_scams_you_50_to_remove_it-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kaspersky Labs discovered that Conficker is charging users $US49.95 in order to &#8220;remove&#8221; the virus from your system. Is it part of a larger business model where the makers intend to profit?


Since it showed up in November 2008, there have been variants of the virus released. Conficker has begun updating itself, which has been dubbed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/virusbig2.jpg" alt="" />Kaspersky Labs discovered that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/confickerd_machines_are_all_doing_emsomethingem-2.html">Conficker</a> is charging users $US49.95 in order to &#8220;remove&#8221; the virus from your system. Is it part of a larger business model where the makers intend to profit?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: virus, conficker business model, conficker virus, confickr, scam, virus scam --><br />
<span id="more-333650"></span>
<p>Since it showed up in November 2008, there have been variants of the virus released. Conficker has begun updating itself, which has been dubbed Conficker.e. Conficker.e is installing Waledac, a spam bot. In turn, it&#8217;ll spam you to remove it for a certain price. The original Conficker virus was supposed to activate on April 1 with the potential of infected Windows computers everywhere doing its bidding. Instead, it lay dormant. Not all Conficker nodes have been acting the same, so what&#8217;s really going on? [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/162891/conficker_reveals_its_business_model.html?tk=rss_news">PC World</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/the_conficker_virus_scams_you_50_to_remove_it-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
