<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; lcd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/lcd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Five Best TVs You Can Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-five-best-tvs-you-can-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-five-best-tvs-you-can-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Merson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pioneer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pioneer kuro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve teamed up with the HD Guru himself, Gary Merson, to publish the absolute best five TVs you can buy right now. As you&#8217;ll see (and might already notice above), there are some surprises on the list.
Panasonic Z1
Panasonic&#8217;s flagship HDTV is its thinnest 54-inch (137cm) plasma HDTV ever, with only 2.5cm depth. They did it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/5_best_tvs_2009.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_5_best_tvs_2009.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a><em>We&#8217;ve teamed up with the <a href="http://hdguru.com/">HD Guru</a> himself, Gary Merson, to publish the absolute best five TVs you can buy right now. As you&#8217;ll see (and might already notice above), there are some surprises on the list.</em><span id="more-368443"></span></p>
<h3>Panasonic Z1</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_panasonic_z1.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Panasonic&#8217;s flagship HDTV is its thinnest 54-inch (137cm) plasma HDTV ever, with only 2.5cm depth. They did it by eliminating a third sheet of glass found in all other plasmas except Pioneer&#8217;s Kuro and bonding the anti-reflective coating directly top glass. The Z1 employs SiBEAM&#8217;s 60GHz 1080p for wireless glitch-free images sent via the included transmitter/media box from up to 10m away. The Z1 has THX picture mode and a custom calibration mode, plus nice bonus features including Viera Cast internet connectivity and an SD card reader for photos. The Z1 delivers amazing performance with full 1080-line motion resolution, accurate HD colour, deep black levels and 96Hz for judder free movie viewing.</p>
<p>The sexiest HDTV of 2009, the TH-P54Z1A has an RRP of $7000 in Australia.</p>
<h3>Pioneer Kuro Plasma Screens</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pioneer_kuro_signature.jpg" alt="" class="center" />The Kuro models offer the deepest black of any high-definition display on the market &mdash; without any white-letter-on-black-background halos occasionally seen on plasma TVs. The Kuro models feature hand-selected parts, 6cm depth, custom calibration, 72Hz refresh and control over the internet via its Ethernet connection. The Pioneer uses a single top sheet of glass to minimise internal reflections, with the anti-reflection coating bonded directly to the surface.</p>
<p>In Australia, the 50-inch (127cm) PDPLX509A retails for $6499, while a 60-inch (152cm) size PDPLX609A has an RRP of $12,499.</p>
<h3>Samsung Series 8</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_samsung_8500_series.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Samsung has the slimmest LED television in the world (3cm deep). It&#8217;s feature packed with wireless connectivity, four HDMI inputs, no edge blur thanks to 200Hz refresh, a PV+C input for connection to your computer or HTPC, and it uses 40 per cent less energy than previous similar-sized LCD TVs. This is a benchmark LED LCD to judge against every other make and model.</p>
<p>All this performance comes at a price. The 46-inch (117cm) UA46B8000 and the 55-inch (140cm) UA55B8000 retails for $4699 and $6499, respectively. </p>
<h3>LG LH90QD</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lg_lh90.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
<p>This LG has all the hot LCD performance features video freaks crave, including LED backlights for excellent black levels, invisible speakers, and TruMotion 200Hz for increased sharpness and reduced motion blur. This LG also has all the tweaks anyone could ask for including ISF calibration and LG&#8217;s &#8220;picture wizard&#8221; for user set-up without calibration discs or external test signals. The LH90 isn&#8217;t the thinnest LED LCD, but it more than makes up for it with its price.</p>
<p>The LG LH90 series is available in 42-inch (107cm) and 47-inch (119cm) screen sizes in Australia. The 42LH90QD has an RRP of $4024 and the 47LH90QD goes for $4944. In case you couldn&#8217;t tell, the LH90 series is the value/performance leader of the pack.</p>
<h3>Sony XBR</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sony_xbr8.jpg" alt="" class="center" />The XBR series is the only HDTV available with separate red, green and blue LED backlights (rather than all white). It&#8217;s got accurate HDTV colour, local dimming for deep black levels, enough brightness for a beach house, a 178-degree viewing angle, 100Hz Motionflow technology and Sony&#8217;s Bravia Engine 2 signal processing.</p>
<p>There are three screen sizes available in Australia. The KDL40XBR45 40-inch (102cm) version retails for $2999, the 46-inch (117cm) KDL46XBR45 retails for $4999, and the 55-inch (140cm) KDL55XBR45 goes for $8499. </p>
<p><i>Gary Merson is the <a href="http://hdguru.com/">HD Guru</a>, the industry&#8217;s leading HDTV journalist. He&#8217;s been reviewing TVs for well over a decade, and recently wrote a <a href="http://hdguru.com/choosing-the-hdtv-that%E2%80%99s-right-for-you/603/">guide to choosing an HDTV</a>.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-five-best-tvs-you-can-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giz Explains: The Difference Between A $US600 TV And A $US6000 TV</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/giz-explains-the-difference-between-a-us600-tv-and-a-us6000-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/giz-explains-the-difference-between-a-us600-tv-and-a-us6000-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can buy an HDTV, a nice big one, for six hundred bucks. Or you can pay six thousand. It&#8217;s presumably somehow better. You&#8217;re probably wondering, &#8220;What the hell makes it better?&#8221; Here&#8217;s the breakdown.
To be clear, we&#8217;re only looking at sets that are at least 46 inches (117cm) &#8212; go big or go home. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_tvs_600and6000.jpg" alt="" class="center" />You can buy an HDTV, a nice big one, for six hundred bucks. Or you can pay six <em>thousand</em>. It&#8217;s presumably somehow <em>better</em>. You&#8217;re probably wondering, &#8220;What the hell makes it better?&#8221; Here&#8217;s the breakdown.<span id="more-368220"></span></p>
<p>To be clear, we&#8217;re only looking at sets that are at least 46 inches (117cm) &mdash; go big or go home. And though there are some nice 720p plasmas out there for amazing prices, the majority of TVs we&#8217;re concerned with are 1080p &mdash; it&#8217;s the standard now, even in cheap HDTVs, and probably the only resolution you&#8217;ll see next year.</p>
<p>We focus on LCDs quite a bit here, not because we prefer them, but because there are key enhancements that can be put in LCD technology to make them look better. With plasma, the problems &mdash; energy consumption, weight, thickness &mdash; are more of an evolutionary, year-to-year thing. A cheaper plasma often is one that&#8217;s just using older technology.</p>
<p>Also, we&#8217;re using Amazon as our pricing base line, since it&#8217;s on average a good standard for low but legitimate street prices, and we use Samsung examples a lot because they have a <i>ton</i> of different models on the market, so it was easier to isolate individual features and to gauge subtle differences in pricing.</p>
<h3>Size Matters</h3>
<p>The first and most obvious thing that&#8217;ll cost you is more screen real estate. There&#8217;s not an absolute inches to dollars ratio, but generally speaking, the first step up is the cheapest, and somewhere in the middle there&#8217;s a sweet spot, after which you basically lose money by upgrading. The funny thing is, each maker seems to have a different idea of where the sweet spot is, which you could play to your advantage:</p>
<p>Take for instance, Panasonic&#8217;s plasma G10 series. It&#8217;s $US200 to go from the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P42G10-42-Inch-Plasma/dp/B001UAEWSU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258557735&#038;sr=8-2">42-inch model</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P50G10-50-Inch-Plasma/dp/B001UAEWUS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258557735&#038;sr=8-1">50 inches</a>, and then $US400 to go up to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P54G10-54-Inch-Plasma/dp/B00267PY6K/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258557735&#038;sr=8-4">54 inches</a>. So the sweet spot is at 50 inches. Similar thing happening with Vizio&#8217;s XVT line: Going from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-SV421XVT-42-Inch-XVT-HDTV/dp/B002JPCVBK/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258558539&#038;sr=8-4">42 inches</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-SV471XVT-47-Inch-XVT-HDTV/dp/B002JPEQNG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258558539&#038;sr=8-2">47 inches</a> is just $US250, though going up to 55 inches from 47 inches costs about <a href="http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-VF551XVT-55-Inch-XVT-TruLED/dp/B002JPEWOO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258558539&#038;sr=8-3">a grand</a>. Hence 47 inches makes the most dollar-per-inch sense if you like that TV.</p>
<p>With Sony and Samsung, though, it pays to keep going up. In Sony&#8217;s top-of-the-line Bravia XBR9 series, the hop from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL-40XBR9-40-Inch-1080p/dp/B001VITUJ2/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258557472&#038;sr=8-3">40 inches</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL-46XBR9-46-Inch-1080p/dp/B0021LT066/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258557472&#038;sr=8-2">46 inches</a> is $US360, but going from 46 inches to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL-52XBR9-52-Inch-1080p/dp/B001VFMA5Q/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258557472&#038;sr=8-1">52 inches</a> is just $US250. Samsung&#8217;s LED-backlit TV costs $US350 to go from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN40B6000-40-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMV90/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258558324&#038;sr=8-2">40 inches</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258558324&#038;sr=8-1">46 inches</a>, and just $US500 to go from there to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN55B6000-55-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVDQ/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258558324&#038;sr=8-3">55 inches</a>. (There&#8217;s a limit, of course, <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/tv-video/televisions/lcd-tv/LN65B650X1FXZA/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail">Samsung&#8217;s 65-inch LN65B650</a> doesn&#8217;t have many of the frills discussed below, but still lists for $US6000.)</p>
<p>The real lesson here: Don&#8217;t think of size as a foregone conclusion. When you&#8217;ve narrowed down your options using all the criteria, go back and check the sizes and relative prices. There may be a surprise, hopefully good but possibly bad.</p>
<h3>Vroom, Vroom</h3>
<p>Everything after size you can roughly sweep everything you&#8217;d pay more for into the category of performance. The grand trick of buying TVs though, according to our friend Gary Merson of <a href="http://hdguru.com">HD Guru</a>, is that &#8220;the TV industry is set up like the car industry&#8221;. Just like buying a Corvette to battle your mid-life crisis because it vrooms real good, when you pay extra money for extra horsepower, you&#8217;re also going to get leather bucket seats and the in-dash GPS. It&#8217;s hard to buy a stripped-down car that <em>just</em> delivers better performance, and the same goes when you&#8217;re trying to scrimp on a TV without compromising picture. In the case of TVs, a higher performer might come with a million HDMI jacks or integrated Wi-Fi and video on demand, and you never know exactly what you&#8217;re paying for.</p>
<p>Fortunately, we can break performance into two major categories so it&#8217;s slightly easier to interpret those price differentials: Backlight (for LCDs) and panel quality.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_samsung8500.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_samsung8500.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
<h3>Fancy Backlighting</h3>
<p>The single most expensive upgrade for LCD TVs right now is LED backlighting. As <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/giz_explains_whats_so_great_about_ledbacklit_lcds-2/">we explain here</a>, there are a bunch of advantages to LED over conventional CCFL backlighting for LCD TVs. Which particular advantages you pick up depends on the kind of LED backlighting in the set. While both offer instant on and power savings, <em>edge-lit</em> models mainly deliver serious thinness, while <em>backlit</em> sets can offer local dimming, which delivers noticeably better black levels and contrast.</p>
<p>How much will it cost you? Well, comparing two Samsung sets with fairly equivalent panels, the price difference is about $US500. The CCFL-backlit LN46B650 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B650-46-Inch-1080p-Touch/dp/B001ULBP8E/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649269&#038;sr=8-2">is $US1360</a>, while the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649256&#038;sr=8-1">UN46B6000 is $US1850</a>. Because it&#8217;s got LED edge lighting, the B6000 is only 3cm thick, compared to the B650&#8217;s 7.8cm. When you step up and compare Samsung&#8217;s edge-lit to back-lit, the difference isn&#8217;t as great: A <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B8000-46-Inch-1080p-240Hz/dp/B001ZUZ10I/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258648855&#038;sr=8-7">46-inch 8000 series edge-lit model</a> goes for $US2300, while the <a ref="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B8000-46-Inch-1080p-240Hz/dp/B001ZUZ10I/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258648855&#038;sr=8-7">8500 series</a> with local-dimming is $US2600. (If you&#8217;re already paying for LED technology, you definitely want to step up.)</p>
<p>So yes, backlit LED sets with local dimming tend to cost more. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Bravia-KDL-46XBR8-46-Inch-Triluminos/dp/B001GIPMNU/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649650&#038;sr=8-13">Sony&#8217;s year-old Bravia XBR8</a> uses tri-colour LEDs to improve colour accuracy over the most LED sets, which use white ones. Though its production is discontinued, it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Bravia-KDL-46XBR8-46-Inch-Triluminos/dp/B001GIPMNU/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649650&#038;sr=8-13">still nearly $US2200</a> at 46 inches. However, Toshiba consistently delivers cheaper sets than most of its fellow &#8220;name&#8221; brands, and their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-46SV670U-46-Inch-Backlight-ClearScan/dp/B001TOD3K0/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649650&#038;sr=8-14">46-inch LED backlit set with local dimming</a> is just $US1700.</p>
<h3>Panels and Oh, It Hertz</h3>
<p>The panel is the other major thing that determines how good an HDTV actually is, and it applies to both LCDs and plasmas. Typically, as you move up in price, you get a better panel. Cheaper sets generally use older panels with previous-generation tech that Merson says have a poorer viewing angle, so there&#8217;s a smaller area you can actually stare at on your TV to get a good picture. The problem is that no TV manufacturer actually declares its panel attributes on the box, so you&#8217;re often on your own to figure it out. The best way is to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/how_to_buy_an_hdtv_tomorrow_or_any_day-2/">go to the store and check out the viewing angles</a>.</p>
<p>Hertz, for the uninitiated, is simply the number of times per second that LCD TVs refresh their picture. (Plasma isn&#8217;t part of this discussion because phosphor pixels work differently than liquid crystal ones, and plasma&#8217;s &#8220;refresh rate&#8221; would be way higher &mdash; to the point of irrelevance.) A 60Hz LCD refreshes the picture 60 times a second, 120Hz is 120 times a second, and so on, up to 240Hz in the top-priced LCD sets. A higher refresh rate is supposed to increase the ability to see fast-moving video at its highest intended resolution, and it works well in theory, though there are <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/why-you-dont-need-to-spend-extra-money-on-a-240hz-lcd-tv/">issues with 240Hz execution</a>. At this point, a minimum of 120Hz is a given on all premium LCDs, says Merson. There isn&#8217;t one LED-backlit set that doesn&#8217;t have it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how the refresh-rate step-ups look: The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B550-46-Inch-1080p-Touch/dp/B001UE6HPM/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649122&#038;sr=8-4">46-inch Samsung B550</a> is a standard 1080p CCFL-backlit set for $US1020. Moving up to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B650-46-Inch-1080p-Touch/dp/B001ULBP8E/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=tv&#038;qid=1258650863&#038;sr=1-2">the same size B650 for $US1360</a> &mdash; $US300 more &mdash; gets you 120Hz (plus a higher contrast ratio). Going up again, to the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B750-46-Inch-1080p-Charcoal/dp/B001UVEZFE/ref=sr_1_44?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649013&#038;sr=8-44">B750 for $US1630</a>, another $US300, you get 240Hz, and again even better contrast ratio. That&#8217;s about the top of Samsung&#8217;s CCFL-backlit line.</p>
<p>You can see the same thing with their LED sets: The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649256&#038;sr=8-1">46-inch B6000</a> is a 120Hz LED edge-lit set for $US1850. The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B8000-46-Inch-1080p-240Hz/dp/B001ZUZ10I/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258648855&#038;sr=8-7">46-inch LED edgel-lit B8000</a> goes to 240Hz and it costs $US2300, about $US450 more.</p>
<h3>What About Plasma?</h3>
<p>As we mentioned, plasmas are a little less complicated, since there&#8217;s nothing like refresh rates to deal with. On the other hand, the situation may be more obtuse, since you don&#8217;t always know what the real differences are. Merson says there are a few basic levels of plasma performance. Stepping up to the 50-inch 1080p plasmas will generally cost $US300 to $US400 more.</p>
<p>There are more issues, however. Panasonic has a new panel called NeoPDP that&#8217;s more energy efficient, but it&#8217;s sometimes hard to tell which models have it and which don&#8217;t. (Hint: Look for the Energy Rating sticker.) Finally, you have THX-certified panels that offer nearly perfect calibration right out of the box. Beyond that, contrast ratios do tend to get better over time, but it&#8217;s relative: At the low end of the HDTV price spectrum, plasma sets have generally delivered better picture than LCD anyway.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_xbr_sony.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
<h3>Frills and Other Stuff</h3>
<p>The funny thing about TVs nowadays is that there&#8217;s more to them than the screen. Like inputs. Until recently, one thing you got more of by paying more money were more holes to stick things into. That&#8217;s not really the case once you get up into 46-inch sets &mdash; you&#8217;re gonna get four HDMI slots in a set that big no matter what. But there are other things nowadays. Like video services that come in through other holes, or maybe without wires at all.</p>
<p>An example, to use our old friends at Samsung: The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258649650&#038;sr=8-2">B6000</a> looks a lot like the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B7000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVKY/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics&#038;qid=1258650566&#038;sr=1-7">B7000</a>, but with the B7000, for $US180 more you get online video services via Yahoo&#8217;s widget engine, like YouTube.</p>
<p>Or, let&#8217;s look at the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-new-kings-of-led-backlit-lcd-tv/">upcoming crop of LED TVs</a> that aren&#8217;t even out yet, or are in limited distribution for now. LG&#8217;s 55LHX and Sony&#8217;s Bravia XBR10 both have wireless HDMI and 240Hz, but with Bravia Internet Widgets and Slacker radio, the Bravia is $US5000, $US200 more than 55LHX. Wireless HDMI itself is a pretty pricey feature. Same Sony, compared to Samsung&#8217;s 8500. The 8500 has built-in video services, but no wireless HDMI, and it&#8217;s $US500 cheaper, at $US4500. Oh, and did I mention that the Sony is even 7cm smaller than the Samsung and LG?</p>
<p>Wireless is still in the gimmick phase, but next year, we assume we&#8217;ll be able to track its price premium as well as we can track size, refresh rate, backlighting and other factors today, $US300 to $US400 at a time. How do you get from $US600 to a $US6000? You just add, add some more and then keep adding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/giz-explains-the-difference-between-a-us600-tv-and-a-us6000-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LED Backlighting Is LCD&#8217;s Trump Card</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/led-backlighting-is-lcds-trump-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/led-backlighting-is-lcds-trump-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History of TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led tvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up until recently, LCDs just couldn&#8217;t compete with plasmas when it came to showing blacks or colours. They weren&#8217;t just bad, either: they sucked, at least in comparison to plasma. But then came LED backlighting, and things changed.
Backlighting is where an LCD stores all its mojo. It controls the brightness, the contrast, and the overall [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_LG_Samsung_Sony_LED_LCD_CEDIA_09.jpg" title="led tvs" class="aligncenter" width="500" height="117" />Up until recently, LCDs just couldn&#8217;t compete with plasmas when it came to showing blacks or colours. They weren&#8217;t just bad, either: they sucked, at least in comparison to plasma. But then came LED backlighting, and things changed.<span id="more-367753"></span></p>
<p>Backlighting is where an LCD stores all its mojo. It controls the brightness, the contrast, and the overall performance of a display. Not all LED backlighting is created equal though. Fortunately, there&#8217;s this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/giz_explains_whats_so_great_about_ledbacklit_lcds-2/">great post</a> explaining the intricacies of the different LED backlight types. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED-backlit_LCD_television#cite_note-Quantum_Dots_in_LED_Backlit_LCD_television-5">Wikipedia</a>, the first commercial LCD TV with LED backlighting was the Sony Qualia 005 back in 2004. It used RBG LED backlighting, although it lacked the more recent ability to dim different sections of the screen that many current LED backlit TVs do. This means that these televisions are able to show blacks as true blacks, rather than a dull grey colour, thanks to the ability to turn off the backlight altogether. </p>
<p>Yet despite LED backlit TVs launching five years ago, it&#8217;s only in the past 18 months that the market has really started to offer LED TVs. Now, almost all TV manufacturers are promoting LED as the next big thing in TV technology. And until OLED becomes big enough and affordable enough, it probably is&#8230;</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/history-of-tv">History of TV</a> is Giz AU’s month-long look back at the development of the world-changing medium and its influence on our daily lives. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/led-backlighting-is-lcds-trump-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Rear Projection Made It BIG</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/when-rear-projection-made-it-big/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/when-rear-projection-made-it-big/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History of TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dlp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laservue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitsubishi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rear projection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you owned a TV with a screen bigger than 40 inches before the year 2000, chances are it was a rear projection model. And chances are it took up most of your loungeroom.
Rear projection TV were increasingly popular back in the 90s and early this decade thanks to their large screen sizes and relatively [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/rear-projection-tv.jpg"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/rear-projection-tv.jpg" alt="rear projection tv" title="rear projection tv" width="250" height="300" class="alignright size-full wp-image-365526" /></a>If you owned a TV with a screen bigger than 40 inches before the year 2000, chances are it was a rear projection model. And chances are it took up most of your loungeroom.<span id="more-365523"></span></p>
<p>Rear projection TV were increasingly popular back in the 90s and early this decade thanks to their large screen sizes and relatively affordable price tags &#8211; especially when compared to the early asking price of LCD and plasma displays. They use three main technologies to project the image from inside the body to the screen: CRT, LCD and DLP. </p>
<p>But unfortunately, the technology was held back by its shortcomings and the dropping price of LCDs and plasmas. Because they projected an image, they were deep, needing the space inside the body to be able to throw the image from the projector to the screen. That meant they couldn&#8217;t be wall mounted, and tended to take up a lot of space. </p>
<p>Nowadays, there&#8217;s nary a rear projection TV to be found in the shops. Most of the major TV players have stuck their flags in the plasma or LCD camps (or both) and left rear projection behind. The noted exception is Mitsubishi, who have further developed the technology with the introduction of lasers, which both improves picture quality and lessens the necessary depth of the TV &#8211; their LaserVue sets are actually wall mountable. Still, that doesn&#8217;t mean that the technology hasn&#8217;t been superceded &#8211; despite having a great few years when most big TVs sold were big and bulky, these days you&#8217;re safer to go a flat panel TV.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/history-of-tv">History of TV</a> is Giz AU’s month-long look back at the development of the world-changing medium and its influence on our daily lives. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/when-rear-projection-made-it-big/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BeoVision 7 LCD Gets Bigger, Pricier And Blu-rayier</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/beovision-7-lcd-gets-bigger-pricier-and-blu-rayier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/beovision-7-lcd-gets-bigger-pricier-and-blu-rayier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bang & olufsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beovision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beovision 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously available as a 40-inch model in the States, Bang &#038; Olufsen have upgraded their BeoVision 7 with a 55-inch LCD, direct-type LED backlight with local dimming for greater contrast, two motorised floor-stand options and room for a Blu-ray player.
They have also significantly upped the price to $US18,700 &#8212; and that&#8217;s just for the TV, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/beovision_7.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_beovision_7.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Previously available as a 40-inch model in the States, Bang &#038; Olufsen have upgraded their <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/beovision">BeoVision</a> 7 with a 55-inch LCD, direct-type LED backlight with local dimming for greater contrast, two motorised floor-stand options and room for a Blu-ray player.<span id="more-366193"></span></p>
<p>They have also significantly upped the price to $US18,700 &mdash; and that&#8217;s just for the TV, stand and centre speaker. Of course, just because you can afford a TV like this doesn&#8217;t mean you should. Consider the following blurb from the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p> BeoVision 7-55 integrates the sophisticated Bang &#038; Olufsen BeoSystem 3 video engine, which delivers superior signal processing due to the VisionClear package of picture improvement technologies. In addition, Bang &#038; Olufsen has included double frame rate technology, also known as 120 Hz, with motion compensation and progressive scanning backlight. These technologies significantly reduce the inherent blur typical of LCD screens. With BeoVision 7-55 the picture is clear and sharp even during fast-moving scene</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Just the other day we were considering the issue of motion blur in LCDs and how <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/why-you-dont-need-to-spend-extra-money-on-a-240hz-lcd-tv/">the problem has been all but eliminated in most mid- to high-end sets</a>. Who knows how much they tacked on to the price tag by exaggerating the importance of technology that probably doesn&#8217;t do any better than an LCD you bought for a fraction of the price. I mean it&#8217;s a good-looking piece of equipment, but it&#8217;s not worth all that money just because it looks cool and it was made in Denmark. [<a href="http://www.bang-olufsen.com/page.asp?id=330">Bang &#038; Olufsen</a> via <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bang--olufsen-announces-beovision-7-55-inch-with-improved-lcd-picture-technology-69738567.html">PR Newswire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/beovision-7-lcd-gets-bigger-pricier-and-blu-rayier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG Joins The Christmas Bonus Deal Brigade</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/lg-joins-the-christmas-bonus-deal-brigade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/lg-joins-the-christmas-bonus-deal-brigade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest company to offer free bonuses with TV purchases? LG, who are offering a bonus 23-inch full HD LCD valued at $899 when you pick up a selected LG TV or fridge.
There are 20,000 bonus TVs available with TV purchases and 7000 for fridge purchases. The promo is running from today to December 31st. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/10/LG-TV-deal.png"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/10/LG-TV-deal-200x90.png" alt="LG TV deal" title="LG TV deal" width="200" height="90" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-363304" /></a>The latest company to offer free bonuses with TV purchases? LG, who are offering a bonus 23-inch full HD LCD valued at $899 when you pick up a selected LG TV or fridge.<span id="more-363303"></span></p>
<p>There are 20,000 bonus TVs available with TV purchases and 7000 for fridge purchases. The promo is running from today to December 31st. If this sounds like your cup of tea, check out LG&#8217;s promo page for more info.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.lge.com.au/promotion/bonuslcdtv">LG TV bundle</a> &#038; <a href="http://www.lge.com.au/promotion/fridgebonuslcdtv">LG Fridge bundle</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/lg-joins-the-christmas-bonus-deal-brigade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s Sexy &#8220;Needle Slim&#8221; 3mm HDTV</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsungs-sexy-needle-slim-3mm-hdtv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsungs-sexy-needle-slim-3mm-hdtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At just 3mm thick, Samsung&#8217;s latest 40-inch LED backlit LCD HDTV is as thin as Sony&#8217;s XEL-1 OLED TV. It almost makes the 1-inch thin Panasonic Z1 Plasma look chubby and Samsung&#8217;s current LED LCD TVs (about 1.2 inches) look fat.
All we know right now is that the model you see has a 120Hz LCD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/SamsuungThin-TV-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_SamsuungThin-TV-1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>At just 3mm thick, Samsung&#8217;s latest 40-inch LED backlit LCD HDTV is as thin as Sony&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/sony_xel1_oled_tv_review_verdict_small_on_size_large_on_beauty-2/">XEL-1 OLED TV</a>. It almost makes the 1-inch thin <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/panasonics-1-inch-thin-z1-plasma-deemed-beautiful-but-pricey/">Panasonic Z1 Plasma</a> look chubby and Samsung&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid/">current</a> LED LCD TVs (about 1.2 inches) look fat.<span id="more-362745"></span></p>
<p>All we know right now is that the model you see has a 120Hz LCD panel, and 5000:1 contrast ratio. Oh, and Samsung hopes to push it out ASAP. I bet. [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-19190-Samsung+Unveils+Their+3mm+thin+40%E2%80%9D+LED+Backlight+TV.html">Akihabara News</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/SamsungThinTV-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_SamsungThinTV-2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/samsungs-sexy-needle-slim-3mm-hdtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ Confirms Barnes &amp; Noble &#8220;Nook&#8221; Reader Price At $US259</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/wsj-confirms-barnes-noble-nook-reader-price-at-us259/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/wsj-confirms-barnes-noble-nook-reader-price-at-us259/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barnes and noble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barnes and nobles reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the WSJ, the Barnes &#38; Noble reader will be announced tomorrow at $US259. Descriptions match our leaked photos exactly. They found the device through a premature ad shown on the NYTimes website! Who scooped who here?
 Features of the Nook include a wireless connection to download books from the retailer&#8217;s online e-bookstore and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/bereader2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_bereader2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>According to the WSJ, the Barnes &amp; Noble reader will be announced tomorrow at $US259. <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/exclusive-first-photos-of-barnes-nobles-ereader/">Descriptions match our leaked photos exactly</a>. They found the device through a premature ad shown on the NYTimes website! Who scooped who here?<span id="more-361278"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Features of the Nook include a wireless connection to download books from the retailer&#8217;s online e-bookstore and an e-paper display from E-Ink Corp. that is separate from the colour controls.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> The only discrepancy we&#8217;ve found with our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/exclusive-first-photos-of-barnes-nobles-ereader/">original story</a> is that B&amp;N was not priced lower than the Kindle, as our sources said it might be. It&#8217;s tied at $US259. But given the lending feature and colour screen, a price match may be more than enough to compete with.</p>
<p>They also reveal the name as &#8220;Nook&#8221;. It&#8217;s kind of dumb. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703816204574483790552304348.html?ru=MKTW&amp;mod=MKTW">WSJ</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/barnes-and-noble-nook-color-e-reader-out-tuesday-for-259-says/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/wsj-confirms-barnes-noble-nook-reader-price-at-us259/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm&#8217;s Mirasol Ultra Low Power Display Is Almost Magic</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomms-mirasol-display-or-how-to-make-a-color-kindle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomms-mirasol-display-or-how-to-make-a-color-kindle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gobi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirasol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm mirasol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eBook readers suffer because they use E-Ink, which isn&#8217;t in colour and doesn&#8217;t refresh fast enough to do video. Qualcomm is quietly showing off its Mirasol display, now in full colour with 30fps video. See for yourself.

The video was shot by IntoMobile. As they describe it, the tech sounds like a massive DLP chip &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Qualcomm_Mirasol_display.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Qualcomm_Mirasol_display.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>eBook readers suffer because they use E-Ink, which isn&#8217;t in colour and doesn&#8217;t refresh fast enough to do video. Qualcomm is quietly showing off its Mirasol display, now in full colour with 30fps video. See for yourself.<span id="more-359077"></span></p>
<p><object width="500" height="375"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6955767&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6955767&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375"></object></p>
<p>The video was shot by <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/10/07/qualcomm-shows-off-30fps-color-video-on-mirasol-display.html">IntoMobile</a>. As they describe it, the tech sounds like a massive DLP chip &mdash; that is, a panel covered with tiny reflective mirrors. Each mirror can change colour but it&#8217;s a passive screen, with no backlight (like most LCDs) and no self-illumination (a la OLED). They get lit up by whatever light is in the room. Saving energy is the key here &mdash; anytime you eliminate a light source, you cut way down on the juice. No word on when this will appear on devices, but it&#8217;s Qualcomm, so you can bet there will at least be some experimental products before too long.</p>
<p>Speaking of experimental products, Time&#8217;s Josh Quittner points out, <a href="http://thethirdscreen.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/a-full-color-passive-display-that-does-video-thats-a-giant-step-for-e-readers/">on his blog</a>, that several of Qualcomm&#8217;s components could go together to make a formidable eBook device. Besides this screen, they&#8217;ve got the multi-network mobile chipset (Gobi), a respectable mobile CPU (Snapdragon), and a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomm-flo-tv-ptv-hands-on-us250-to-shut-up-the-kids/">powerful media delivery system</a> (MediaFLO). Forget the Kindle &mdash; who needs Amazon? Oh right, books. [<a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/10/07/qualcomm-shows-off-30fps-color-video-on-mirasol-display.html">IntoMobile</a> via <a href="http://thethirdscreen.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/a-full-color-passive-display-that-does-video-thats-a-giant-step-for-e-readers/">Netly</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomms-mirasol-display-or-how-to-make-a-color-kindle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No TV For The Big Game? Solved.</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/no-tv-for-the-big-game-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/no-tv-for-the-big-game-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Oaten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyagi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the situation. You&#8217;d like to get some mates around for the NRL final on October 4 but your old clanker of a TV isn&#8217;t up to the task, or maybe it just gave out. You need a new one in a hurry but the budget is tight. Giz just caught wind of a deal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/tyagitv-200x145.jpg" alt="tyagitv" title="tyagitv" width="200" height="145" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-355938" />Here&#8217;s the situation. You&#8217;d like to get some mates around for the NRL final on October 4 but your old clanker of a TV isn&#8217;t up to the task, or maybe it just gave out. You need a new one in a hurry but the budget is tight. Giz just caught wind of a deal from Tyagi that might just help you out.<span id="more-355931"></span> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tyagi.com.au">Tyagi</a> makes LCD TVs. And to be straight up with you, we can&#8217;t vouch for the quality of the product, though the company&#8217;s products are getting some reasonable press, along the lines of &#8220;you get what you pay for&#8221;. That said, we&#8217;ll have a hands-on with one of their TVs as soon as possible, so stay tuned for that. In the meantime, all we&#8217;re saying is that anyone after an inexpensive telly at a reasonable price from one of the, er, smaller names in the business might like to give this a second thought. You&#8217;ll just have to make up your mind before Monday morning.</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s the deal. If you order one before 11am on Monday, that&#8217;s September 28, Tyagi guarantees delivery by Friday, in time for the game on the weekend. Guaranteed. I feel nervous for Tyagi making that claim but on their head be it. The company will also throw in an extra one-year warranty. Tyagi has a few models to offer, but a quick check of their site shows the 37in 1080p LCD TV with HD tuner at $895 would be a pretty good fit for an impromptu grand final party and even more impromptu new TV purchase. </p>
<p>To place an order, visit Tyagi&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tyagi.com.au">site</a> or call 1300 992 354.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/no-tv-for-the-big-game-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
