<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; lasers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/lasers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photo Of Boeing&#8217;s Matrix Laser Destroying An Air Drone</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/photo-of-boeings-matrix-laser-destroying-an-air-drone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/photo-of-boeings-matrix-laser-destroying-an-air-drone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing has successfully tested their new Matrix laser over airborne targets, which is a world first. In total, they shot down five drones at various ranges. That&#8217;s a lot of pew pew in a day.
 The Air Force and Boeing achieved a directed-energy breakthrough with these tests. MATRIX&#8212;Mobile Active Targeting Resource for Integrated eXperiments&#8212;performance is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/boeing-laser-boom.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_boeing-laser-boom.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Boeing has successfully tested their new Matrix laser over airborne targets, which is a world first. In total, they shot down five drones at various ranges. That&#8217;s a lot of pew pew in a day.<span id="more-367813"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> The Air Force and Boeing achieved a directed-energy breakthrough with these tests. MATRIX&mdash;Mobile Active Targeting Resource for Integrated eXperiments&mdash;performance is especially noteworthy because it demonstrated unprecedented, ultra-precise and lethal acquisition, pointing and tracking at long ranges using relatively low laser power.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> I&#8217;m sure that description would get Governor Tarkin wet. Boeing &mdash; along with the Air Force and the Army &mdash; also tested the Laser Avenger, a kinetic-laser hybrid weapon that fires a high power death ray coupled with a 25mm machine gun. </p>
<p>Obviously, the kids in the funny uniforms are happy with their new toys, but I would like to see if they can do the same with a small thermal exhaust port only two metres wide. [<a href="http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&#038;item=941">Boeing</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/boeing-tracks-and-shoots-down-uavs-laser-weapon">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/photo-of-boeings-matrix-laser-destroying-an-air-drone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVs Should Be Better With Lasers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/tvs-should-be-better-with-lasers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/tvs-should-be-better-with-lasers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History of TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arasor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laservue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitsubishi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in October 2006, right before they listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, a company called Arasor held a press conference in Sydney announcing that the future of television had arrived, and that future was lasers. Arasor claimed that an optical chip they made could enable TV manufacturers to use lasers in their TVs for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_249_Solo2_Lft_610x619.jpg" title="laservue" class="aligncenter" width="500" height="507" />Back in October 2006, right before they listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, a company called Arasor held a press conference in Sydney announcing that the future of television had arrived, and that future was <em>lasers</em>. Arasor claimed that an optical chip they made could enable TV manufacturers to use lasers in their TVs for an amazing picture quality. They claimed it would happen by Christmas 2007, and would be supported by a range of manufacturers. Sadly though, it didn&#8217;t and it wasn&#8217;t.<span id="more-367631"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say the company was making false claims in order to boost their ASX listing&#8230; Laser TV did become a reality in early 2008, when Mitsubishi showed off their <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/mitsubishi_laser_tv_and_dancin/">Laservue TVs at CES</a>.</p>
<p>Laser TVs are essentially just rear projection TVs that use lasers to provide the backlight. Using the Arasor chip, the laser-powered TVs are able to reproduce twice the colour range that LCD and plasma can, while using less power and being thinner than traditional rear projection screens.To date, only the Mitsubishi Laservue TVs have launched with the technology, and sadly they&#8217;re not available in many global markets, including Australia.</p>
<p>It seems unlikely that we&#8217;ll ever see laser TVs in Australia. But we can always hope that the technology might be enhanced in future TV sets so that one day, all TVs have freakin&#8217; lasers in them. </p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/history-of-tv">History of TV</a> is Giz AU’s month-long look back at the development of the world-changing medium and its influence on our daily lives. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/tvs-should-be-better-with-lasers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laser-Etched Fruit And Vegetables Could Replace Sticker Labels</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/laser-etched-fruit-and-vegetables-could-replace-those-annoying-sticker-labels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/laser-etched-fruit-and-vegetables-could-replace-those-annoying-sticker-labels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fruit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#8217;t seem like a big deal, but I&#8217;ll be dammed if those stupid stickers are not extremely annoying. Fortunately for people who actually eat fruit and vegetables from time to time, low-energy laser etching may be the answer.
Tests have concluded that foods labelled with the low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam show no signs of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/laser_fruit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_laser_fruit.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It doesn&#8217;t seem like a big deal, but I&#8217;ll be dammed if those stupid stickers are not extremely annoying. Fortunately for people who actually eat fruit and vegetables from time to time, low-energy laser etching may be the answer.<span id="more-365128"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/laser_vegetables.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_laser_vegetables.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Tests have concluded that foods labelled with the low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam show no signs of increased decay when compared to their stickered counterparts. The system has already been employed in New Zealand, Australia and Pacific Rim countries, but the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in the final stages of approving the procedure for US agriculture. Honestly, fruit branding cannot come soon enough. Truly, this is a problem of national importance. How many more stickers must we eat? [<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news176483573.html">Physorg</a> via <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/11/04/low-energy-laser-etching-could-replace-annoying-fruit-labels/#">Inhabitat</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/laser-etched-fruit-and-vegetables-could-replace-those-annoying-sticker-labels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ericsson&#8217;s Spider PC Concept Projects The Keyboard And Screen</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ericssons-spider-pc-concept-projects-the-keyboard-and-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ericssons-spider-pc-concept-projects-the-keyboard-and-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ericsson spider pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pico projectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan broadband show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at the Taiwan Broadband show, Ericsson&#8217;s vision for the portable computer of 2020 uses a pico-projected screen and laser-projected keyboard. And though they&#8217;ve got a rough prototype (pictured), they imagine it ultimately squeezing into this bizarre spider-leg tripod design&#8230;
It&#8217;d have essentials like wireless broadband connectivity and a battery, but I&#8217;m hoping that by 2020 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Ericsson2020-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Ericsson2020-1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Over at the Taiwan Broadband show, Ericsson&#8217;s vision for the portable computer of 2020 uses a pico-projected screen and laser-projected keyboard. And though they&#8217;ve got a rough prototype (pictured), they imagine it ultimately squeezing into this bizarre spider-leg tripod design&#8230;<span id="more-363657"></span></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Ericsson2020-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Ericsson2020-2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It&#8217;d have essentials like wireless broadband connectivity and a battery, but I&#8217;m hoping that by 2020 we&#8217;ll have cooler stuff than a laser-projected keyboard. Their time has <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/laser_keyboard_getting_usb_upd/">come and gone</a> already, no? Less of that, more interactive <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/holograms">holographic display</a> technology, please. More wacky 2020 shenanigans at: [<a href="http://www.ericsson.com/ericsson/corpinfo/2020/">Ericsson</a> via <a href="http://mobileandnotebook.com/news/ericssons-spider-computer-concept-on-video">MobileandNotebook</a>]</p>
<p><object width="570" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nkE7tkVoaiQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nkE7tkVoaiQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="370"></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ericssons-spider-pc-concept-projects-the-keyboard-and-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USAF&#8217;s Ultrawideband Laser Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/usafs-ultrawideband-laser-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/usafs-ultrawideband-laser-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Air Force is not only experimenting with lasers to kill missiles. They are now using them to transmit data from planes and drones at 35km and enabling quantum encryption. They did it with adaptive optics.
 When you transmit information through turbulence&#8212;motion in the atmosphere caused by turbulent cells or &#8220;wind&#8221;&#8212;it&#8217;s distorted just like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/fibreless.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_fibreless.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The US Air Force is not only experimenting with lasers to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/boeing_airborne_laser_weapon_fires_for_the_first_time-2/">kill missiles</a>. They are now using them to transmit data from planes and drones at 35km and enabling <em>quantum encryption</em>. They did it with adaptive optics.<span id="more-363463"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> When you transmit information through turbulence&mdash;motion in the atmosphere caused by turbulent cells or &#8220;wind&#8221;&mdash;it&#8217;s distorted just like the information coming from the light reflected off a distant, twinkling star to your eye. It&#8217;s fuzzy. You have to overcome that by using adaptive optics to rectify the distortion and get a better quality signal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> That&#8217;s what Dr David Hughes, from the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research, says. He claims that the technology has been tested successfully with both stationary and flying situations, which means that they can easily implement it in the battlefield, with not too much effort. [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/28/afosr_fibreless_links/">The Register</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/usafs-ultrawideband-laser-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DIY Laser Hair Removal And DIY Botox Markets Expanding</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/diy-laser-hair-removal-and-diy-botox-markets-expanding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/diy-laser-hair-removal-and-diy-botox-markets-expanding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser hair removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love DIY projects, lasers and chemistry sets as much as the next gal, but the whole do-it-yourself laser hair removal and Botox market boom is terrifying. Untrained individuals shouldn&#8217;t be pointing needles and lasers at themselves.
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons is in an uproar about the things people are doing in their bathrooms. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/diylaser.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_diylaser.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I love DIY projects, lasers and chemistry sets as much as the next gal, but the whole do-it-yourself laser hair removal and Botox market boom is terrifying. Untrained individuals shouldn&#8217;t be pointing needles and lasers at themselves.<span id="more-362549"></span></p>
<p>The American Society of Plastic Surgeons is in an uproar about the things people are doing in their bathrooms. It&#8217;s not that those surgeons are just worried about losing money on procedures, they&#8217;re bound to gain clients from all the DIY mess-ups anyway, but they appear genuinely concerned about regulations and safety. And I agree, because somehow former Gizmodo intern Benny Goldman <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/09/gizmodo_intern_tortured_for_th/">letting the Jezebel team cajole him into a bikini wax</a> doesn&#8217;t seem so insane when you read about people ordering Botox from websites called Discount MedSpa and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C3UBh1rZHs">putting videos of their DIY injections onto YouTube</a> (Warning: the clip may make you cringe).</p>
<p>We all like to look pretty, but there are <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/how_to_turn_your_body_into_a_h_2/">safer ways</a> to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/12/how_to_turn_your_body_into_a_h_2/">get rid of hair</a>, folks! And somehow it&#8217;s better to have wrinkles than order Botox from a website that looks like it was made in Microsoft Word. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/10/diy-lasers/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/diy-laser-hair-removal-and-diy-botox-markets-expanding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Use Lasers To Create False Memories In Flies</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/scientists-use-lasers-to-create-false-memories-in-flies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/scientists-use-lasers-to-create-false-memories-in-flies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team of researchers experimented with fruit flies and found that by genetically engineering some flies, they were able to give those flies the &#8220;memory&#8221; of pain that they never actually experienced. It&#8217;s kind of complicated and kind of creepy.
Basically, and I use the word loosely, the researchers understand that fruit flies are able, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/joss-whedons-dollhouse.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_joss-whedons-dollhouse.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>A team of researchers experimented with fruit flies and found that by genetically engineering some flies, they were able to give those flies the &#8220;memory&#8221; of pain that they never actually experienced. It&#8217;s kind of complicated and kind of creepy.<span id="more-360698"></span></p>
<p>Basically, and I use the word loosely, the researchers understand that fruit flies are able, to a degree, to avoid things that have caused them pain in the past (in this case, they were electrically shocked when flying into a specific area). But then the researchers genetically engineered some flies so that their dopamine-producing brain cells manufacture a laser-sensitive protein. When shone with a laser in a particular area, though the stimulation produced no pain, the flies avoided that area with almost the exact same frequency as they had when there was pain involved. Says one of the researchers:</p>
<blockquote><p> Miesenböck concludes that stimulating dopamine release in these 12 neurons has the same effect as applying electric shocks to flies. In other words, these flies feared that [area] as if they had been conditioned to associate an electric shock with it. &#8220;Stimulating just these neurons gives the flies a memory of an unpleasant event that never happened,&#8221; he says.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> And as for what I know you&#8217;re all wondering: Can this experiment be extended to humans? Well, maybe, and maybe not. A biochemical researcher named Wayne Sossin points out that it&#8217;s sort of unethical to genetically engineer humans, making the hypothesis pretty difficult to test, and that the original fruit fly test only works for short-term, not long-term, memory. So false memories of the sort we expect from sci-fi (or should I say syfy? Answer: I should not) may not be immediately forthcoming. [<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17990-laser-creates-false-memories-in-fly-brains.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news">NewScientist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/scientists-use-lasers-to-create-false-memories-in-flies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kellogg&#8217;s To Laser Its Name Into Corn Flakes To Prevent Fakes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/kelloggs-to-laser-its-name-into-corn-flakes-to-prevent-fakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/kelloggs-to-laser-its-name-into-corn-flakes-to-prevent-fakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cereal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corn flakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kellogg's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a fair chance this is a joke. Dear god, tell me this is a joke. Apparently dismayed by legions of counterfeit corn flakes, Kellogg&#8217;s has developed a laser to etch &#8220;Kellogg&#8217;s&#8221; into individual flakes.
Indications this may be a joke:
1. I&#8217;m not totally sure you can laser-etch corn.
2. There&#8217;s no way Kellogg&#8217;s has or deserves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/article-1220135-06CD1B30000005DC-349_468x286_popup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_article-1220135-06CD1B30000005DC-349_468x286_popup.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>There&#8217;s a fair chance this is a joke. Dear god, tell me this is a joke. Apparently dismayed by legions of counterfeit corn flakes, Kellogg&#8217;s has developed a laser to etch &#8220;Kellogg&#8217;s&#8221; into individual flakes.<span id="more-360196"></span></p>
<p>Indications this may be a joke:</p>
<p>1. I&#8217;m not totally sure you can laser-etch corn.<br />
2. There&#8217;s no way Kellogg&#8217;s has or deserves a monopoly on flakes of corn.<br />
3. A Kellogg&#8217;s &#8220;food technologist&#8221; claims that &#8220;in recent years there has been an increase in the number of other brands trying to capitalise on the popularity of Kellogg&#8217;s corn flakes&#8221;. Corn flakes are not a new invention, you guys. Why the sudden popularity?<br />
4. Corn flakes requires tons of sugar to be palatable anyway, and the combination of sugar and milk is sure to erase the delicate laser etching.<br />
5. This appeared in the Daily Mail, which I don&#8217;t know anything about &mdash; but it is British, and my damnable xenophobia has convinced me that all British publications not called the Guardian are lying tabloids.<br />
6. LASER-ETCHED CORN FLAKES LASER-ETCHED CORN FLAKES.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/article-1220135-06CD1B37000005DC-165_468x593.jpg" alt="" class="left" />It&#8217;s pretty hilarious, regardless of whether it&#8217;s true (and the above six points indicated it is not). Way to be exciting, Corn Flakes, even though you have neither marshmallows nor peanut butter! [<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1220135/Kelloggs-plan-use-laser-burn-logo-individual-corn-flakes-stamp-fakes.html">Daily Mail</a> via <a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/10/waste_of_a_good_laser_kelloggs.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/kelloggs-to-laser-its-name-into-corn-flakes-to-prevent-fakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Astronomers And The Air Force Face Off Over Lasers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/astronomers-and-the-air-force-face-off-over-lasers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/astronomers-and-the-air-force-face-off-over-lasers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telescopes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astronomers are arguing with the Air Force over being allowed to use lasers pointed at the sky to adjust telescopes. The Air Force fears that satellites could be accidentally blinded while astronomers are concerned about missing significant heavenly observations.
Apparently quite a few key observatories use lasers to adjust telescope optics for atmospheric turbulence. Those same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lasersky.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_lasersky.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Astronomers are arguing with the Air Force over being allowed to use lasers pointed at the sky to adjust telescopes. The Air Force fears that satellites could be accidentally blinded while astronomers are concerned about missing significant heavenly observations.<span id="more-360191"></span></p>
<p>Apparently quite a few key observatories use lasers to adjust telescope optics for atmospheric turbulence. Those same lasers can damage Earth-observing satellites and so regulations on their usage have been getting stricter and stricter over the years. Now astronomers have had enough. They are happy to consult with the Air Force each time they point a laser at the sky to make sure that a satellite isn&#8217;t in the path, but it seems that the turnaround time is too long. I don&#8217;t see why they don&#8217;t just change it to a &#8220;We&#8217;ll have your analysis delivered in less than 30 minutes or you can point your lasers wherever you want&#8221; rule. [<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17978-astronomers-clash-with-us-air-force-over-laser-rules.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/astronomers-and-the-air-force-face-off-over-lasers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concept Watch Projects The Time Onto Your Wrist&#8230;With Lasers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/concept-watch-actually-projects-the-time-onto-your-wrist-with-lasers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/concept-watch-actually-projects-the-time-onto-your-wrist-with-lasers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andy kurovets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, some of us wear the time on our wrist, but this concept watch quite literally puts the time on your wrist.
Designed by Andy Kurovets, this concept uses a laser mounted inside the wrist band and angled over the flat part of the wrist to reveal digital time. Very slick, undeniably futuristic. [Yanko Design]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/invisible_shot2.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Sure, some of us wear the time on our wrist, but this concept watch quite literally puts the time on your wrist.<span id="more-358117"></span></p>
<p>Designed by Andy Kurovets, this concept uses a laser mounted inside the wrist band and angled over the flat part of the wrist to reveal digital time. Very slick, undeniably futuristic. [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/10/01/goodness-of-laser-lights-on-a-watch/">Yanko Design</a>]<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/invisible_shot3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/concept-watch-actually-projects-the-time-onto-your-wrist-with-lasers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
