Kazaa

Online

Woman Must Pay $US1.5 Million For Illegally Downloaded Songs

2:20PM November 4, 2010 | Adrian Chen

Jammie Thomas has been fighting the RIAA in court since 2006 over 24 songs she illegally downloaded via Kazaa. A third verdict in the case handed down today awards record companies $US1.5 million in damages, or $US62,500 per song. More »


Kazaa Creators Launch New Music Subscription Service

2:46PM June 3, 2010 | Rosa Golijan

The folks behind popular file-sharing program Kazaa are launching a new music subscription service called Rdio. From the sounds of things, it’ll be similar to existing subscription services. but with a social element: More »


Student Forced To Pay $US675,000 To RIAA For Sharing 30 Songs

8:00AM August 2, 2009 | Dan Nosowitz

Joel Tenenbaum admitted to sharing 30 songs with Kazaa back in 2004 (Kazaa! So quaint!) and was originally fined $US150,000 per song. He worked that down to “only” $US22,500 per song, but that’s still $US675,000 in total. More »


Online

Kazaa Wakes Up From Lawsuit-Induced Coma, Vows To Go Legit

11:54PM July 20, 2009 | John Herrman

Old-line filesharing services can’t seem to switch sides fast enough: Now Kazaa, leading purveyor of illegal MP3s and maliciously mislabelled pornography for few years in the early 2000s, has been reborn as a legal, paid music download service. $US20 a month gets you unlimited downloads, 2005-style: in WMA format, wrapped in tons of DRM. The history of iPod-incompatible music stores is littered with dead bodies, so, well, best of luck. [SMH via The Inquirer]


Online

Court Orders File-Sharer To Pay $80,000 Per Song To RIAA

3:00PM June 19, 2009 | Dan Nosowitz

A delusional Minnesota court has ordered Jammie Thomas, wanton criminal Kazaa user, to pay a total of $US1.92 million for sharing 24 songs. As my own little protest, I’m going to illegally download Metallica’s entire discography. And I hate Metallica. More »


_

Jury on First RIAA Trial Goes Into Deliberations, Hopefully Aren’t Dumb

7:30AM October 5, 2007 | Adam Frucci

The trial of the century — Capitol Records, et al v. Jammie Thomas — is coming to a close, with the Jury having just been sent in for deliberations. The case, which is the first Recording Industry Association of America case to make it to trial, all hinges on whether or not Jammie was the one using her Kazaa handle to share 1,700 files. The suit actually has been boiled down to a mere 24 MP3 files, but the RIAA claims they deserve $US150,000 per song. What planet are you living on, RIAA?

While Jammie’s argument that some 1337 h4X0r was sitting in a tree outside her window and using her Kazaa account without her knowledge is a pretty weak one, the real insanity in the case is that number. What math did they use to make that number up? As Buchanan says, “I’d find her guilty and then assign a penalty of 24 cents, a penny for every track at issue.” Wouldn’t that set a precedent that would neuter the RIAA’s lawsuits by devaluing the very product they claim is so ludicrously valuable? It seems to me that her argument as to being innocent isn’t exactly watertight, but in the end the real decision will be made on how much the jury awards the RIAA. And I can’t really imagine any sensible jury thinking sharing 24 MP3s is really worth $US3.6 million. Stay tuned, we’ll keep you updated. [Threat Level] More »