Essentially an SD card with GPS and Wi-Fi, the 2GB Eye-Fi Geo (like Eye-Fis of yore) fits into any SD card slot. It records location information along with your pictures through integrated GPS. Then it can sync over Wi-Fi to your home computer or internet sites of choice. Fully iLife ‘08 and ‘09 compliant, the Geo may sound a lot like the Eye-Fi Explore. It’s essentially the same thing, but the Geo runs $US60 and doesn’t have any monthly fees. Instead, the GPS data is a one time cost included in the purchase.

EYE-FI INTRODUCES THE EYE-FI GEO APPLE EXCLUSIVE WIRELESS MEMORY CARD WITH
UNLIMITED GEOTAGGING
Eye-Fi Offers Users an Effortless Geotagging and Photo Sharing Experience When Using iPhoto, an iPhone or MobileMe

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., July 29, 2009 – Eye-Fi Inc. today unveiled the Eye-Fi Geo card, a new wireless SD memory card exclusive to Apple that allows users to automatically upload photos from a digital camera to a computer and offers lifetime geotagging service. Available today in all Apple stores and online, the Eye-Fi Geo card is the latest addition to the Eye-Fi product family that is built to seamlessly integrate with Mac products and applications, including iPhoto ‘09 and ‘08, the iPhone and MobileMe.
“Apple users want simplicity and an effortless user experience, so it’s not surprising that a significant number of our users are on Macs,” said Jef Holove, CEO of Eye-Fi. “The Eye-Fi Geo is the perfect companion for iPhoto’s new ‘Places’ application to pinpoint photos on a digital map so memories are displayed in a richer, more meaningful way.”
The Eye-Fi Geo wirelessly uploads photos straight to a folder on your computer or Apple’s iPhoto gallery where they arrive automatically geotagged with location information about where the image was captured.
Eye-Fi continues to embrace its loyal Mac following by developing products that seamlessly integrate with Apple products and features. iPhoto ’09’s “Places” lets users search and sort photos by location using geotags from the Eye-Fi Geo card. Users can also upgrade their Eye-Fi Geo card to share images online at MobileMe or one of more than 20 other photo sharing and social networking sites for a $US9.99 annual fee.
Earlier this year, Eye-Fi released the Eye-Fi application for the iPhone, which wirelessly uploads photos from the iPhone to the Web and into iPhoto, or organized folders on a computer. With Eye-Fi, users can aggregate all of their photos – from both an iPhone and a digital camera –to manage and share photos in one place regardless of which device the photos are taken on. Eye-Fi users with iPhones can download the app for free.
Eye-Fi’s complete line-up of wireless SD and SDHC memory cards, including the Eye-Fi Pro and Eye-Fi Explore Video cards, range in price from $US49-$149 and are available at www.eye.fi, in store at Apple Retail Stores and Best Buy locations, and at major online retailers such as Amazon.com, Walmart.com and Costco.com.
Eye-Fi cards have won numerous Mac product awards, including “Best of Show” at Macworld 2008 and The Mac Observer’s “Editors’ Choice Award 2008″ at Macworld. For more information, please visit www.eye.fi/apple, or follow Eye-Fi on Twitter @EyeFiCard.

About Eye-Fi
Founded in 2005, Eye-Fi is dedicated to building products and services that help consumers navigate, nurture and share their visual memories. Eye-Fi’s patent-pending technology works with Wi-Fi networks to automatically send photos and videos from a digital camera to online, in-home and retail destinations. Headquartered in Mountain View, Calif., the company’s investors include LMS Capital, Opus Capital, Shasta Ventures and TransLink Capital. More information is available at www.eye.fi.

I noticed that the iPhoto 8.0.2 update had some new UI options, so I asked the Apple mothership what all the update covered. Turns out, it solves a few of my original problems:

The main focus for this update was controls and behaviour for Faces, the facial recognition and identification software. I originally groused that it didn’t see people’s heads when they were tilted. Now, if you notice it’s not seeing someone’s head, you can right click and ask it to “Detect Missing Faces.”

It goes back to the picture and guesses at new potential faces. The upside is, it will probably see the face you want it to see, without you manually marking it. The downside is, it may well see faces where there are none. I tried it, and it worked, but it doesn’t make the facial recognition smarter, just less discriminating.

If you use the “Add Missing Face” feature to manually draw a box around a known face, this new software will actually also search that box to see if it can identify the face. This has not immediate impact on your life, but it means that if iPhoto does see a face there, where it didn’t before, it will “count” it when doing facial recognition stuff.

When you are using Faces to name people, it now pulls names from your Address Book. This means, when you start to type in a name, you immediately get choices. If you don’t like all your friends being so formally listed with first and last name, you can change the tag globally very easily later, on the Faces corkboard home screen.

Another very helpful improvement in Faces is the ability to name other people when confirming shots of a particular individual. Like, say you have a bunch of shots of yourself—if you know a shot isn’t you, you right click that shot and choose “Name,” then add in whoever that person’s name is. It’s helpful because before, the choice was either “Yes, this is me” or “No, this is not me.”

In Places, the geotagging feature, 8.0.2 brought some minor improvements. If you added geotag information after importing a photo, you can now “Rescan for Location.”

And when you go to add a location, the option “New Location” has been renamed to “Find on Map,” which makes a lot more sense.

The iPhoto team also added the ability to tag photos directly by using latitude and longitude. I didn’t figure out how exactly this works, but I’m not that big a map nerd, so maybe that’s the problem. If you care about this, chances are you will figure it out. Or already know about it.

The software update doesn’t solve two of my problems: One, which may never go away, is sluggishness when managing Faces. I have a ton of photos, and the function itself requires a lot of background processing, so entering that feature really does slow things down a lot. The other, which will hopefully get fixed, is the automatic tagging of the wrong faces. I visit my Faces catalog only to find the wrong people coming up. It is a concern hopefully grave enough to be addressed in the near future. [iPhoto]

The big story for iPhoto ‘09—part of Apple’s newly released iLife ‘09 suite—is that organisation gets two new dimensions. In iPhoto ‘08, time, the most important organising tool for photos, was more or less mastered with the advent of Events. Now there are Faces and Places, organising by people and location.

I’m not going to BS you: There’s a slim-to-nil chance you will use either to tag every last one of your photos. Still, both are good new ways to organise things so that you can find your best photos faster, and that’s coming from a guy who, in just 36 hours, has organised two or three metric shiteloads of photographic goodness.

FACES
This isn’t tagging pictures with people in it—it’s actually identifying and recognising people, so you don’t have to go looking for them. You have to approve every suggestion it makes, but if you know the tricks, that’s easy. Does Faces work? Yes. Well? Yes. But at first, you have to work with it. Yesterday, I outlined how the facial detection and recognition works (and doesn’t work). Now here’s where you come in:

After the system filters all your photos, looking for faces and doing basic recognition of appearance—a process that takes approximately 1 second per photo on newer Macs—you go to any photo, click Name and identify a person, preferably someone you love and have lots of photos of. We’ll totally hypothetically call that person Jeremy.

Tip: In the early round, only name people whose faces iPhoto detected. Don’t draw a “missing face” box (shown below) around anybody at this point, because the computer can’t use it to find more pictures of your loved one.

Once you’ve made the initial ID, Jeremy’s mug will appear on the Faces corkboard. Clicking on Jeremy brings up any photo (or photos) that you identified in the first step. Underneath a thick border, the computer will show you new photos it thinks are Jeremy. It will be mostly wrong. Do not panic.

Select “Confirm Name” and start clicking on the first photos you see of Jeremy. Do 10 if you can, but fewer is okay. Click Done and wait. Each time you greenlight actual Jeremy photos, the computer churns, using what it now knows to find new shots of Jeremy. It shows the most likely shots are at the top, so towards the bottom of the suggested matches, you get some serious riff-raff.

Tip: The tools are important to learn. Click and drag across photos to confirm multiple shots of Jeremy. Option-click and drag across photos to reject multiple shots who are not Jeremy. Rejection is important, so that the computer knows what not to look for. When you are not in “Confirm Name” mode, just drag shots of Jeremy up into the confirmed-shot window, and delete ones that are not Jeremy.

At some point in this process, the computer just runs out of suggestions. If you think there are more pics of Jeremy, go looking for them. Some good shots may have failed face detection. When you find them, you’ll need to draw a “missing face” window around Jeremy’s face, type in his name, and that shot will then show up in Jeremy’s Faces dossier.

When you think you’ve got Jeremy’s Greatest Hits pretty much nailed, start in on Jeremy’s much more attractive sisters. Repeat the process for Jeremy’s sisters, mother, brother, great-uncle and everyone else you have more than 25 photos of whose name you can still remember. Then whenever you want to find that one damn photo of them doing that one crazy thing, you know where to look.

Tip: In Faces, select two or more people and click Smart Album. On the left, you’ll see an album containing those people, which you can rename “My Family” or “College Friends” or “Girls That Got Away” or whatever. Click on the smart album and you’ll get a sea of photos with at least one person in each shot.

PLACES
In some ways, Places is less automatic than Faces, but in many ways it’s much easier to work with. Since it doesn’t rely on face detection, recognition and a heaping helping of trial and error, it’s much quicker than the at times sluggish Faces. Also, you don’t have to go in deep to add location data. Since iPhoto ‘09 gives every event and every photo an Info button, you can just click to add locations to any cluster of images.

As you might expect, there are multiple ways to input location data. If you have an iPhone or are lucky enough to have a geotagging module for your camera, you don’t have to do squat. Just load your pics, click Places, and smile at your vast array of gleaming red pins. But if you’re like most of the universe, you need to input the location information yourself, which you do by selecting an event or photo, and clicking the Info button.

Tip: Command-click multiple events to select them, then double-click any one of the selected events. You will instantly get a photo cluster containing only those combined photos. Select all, click “Info” on any of the individual shots, and any change you make to it—such as entry of geographical data—is made for all.

Once you’re in the Info pane, start typing a location in the appropriate text box. The computer guesses basic locations—most towns, cities and major landmarks in the US, plus larger cities around the world. It’s easy to stump this one, though. Instead of settling on anything, click the “New Place…”

Here you have Google Local search, so whether it’s the name of that resort in the Caribbean or the bar on Third Avenue, you’ll find it pretty easily. I will warn you: Sometimes the Google search localises on the wrong area, returning only businesses and addresses in a particular city, so be sure to type your city and state. If you want an address, just type it into the search windows.

Once you’ve searched for something, click the plus-sign and you can add it to My Places, a list of the locations you are assigning to your photos. You can rename however you like, and once you’ve added them, they show up in the high-level location search, so they’re easy to re-use whenever you want.

After you’ve added a few locations, click the Places tab on the top left corner of iPhoto. You’ll see a big Google map, with pins for all the photos you’ve tagged. Click a pin and you get an arrow; click the arrow and you get your photos. When looking at one of your geotagged photos, go up to the Photo menu and select “Show Extended Photo Info.” Suddenly you’ll see not just the shot’s metadata, but the geographical latitude and longitude that came either from GPS or your own data entry. The shame is that they’re indistinguishable, since unless you’re inputting street addresses for geotags, the GPS data is going to be much more accurate.

Tip: Clicking on a pin gives you only shots from that specific geographical location. For instance, the Seattle pin may not give you shots you took at a bar downtown, if you gave that bar a more particular geography. In this case, search for “Seattle” and you will see all shots geotagged in the metro area, plus any shot tagged Seattle or living in a folder called “Seattle.”

Once you’ve geotagged your photos, you can make use of the mapping feature when making a “travel book.” Unlike iMovie, there’s only one map style, but as you can see, there are still many different ways to position a map in the book:

RETOUCHING & ENHANCING
There was a time when I’d rather use anything but iPhoto to tweak my shots, but little by little, useful adjustment tools are making their way in. This time around, saturation has been made “smart”—you can click it to adjust background colour vibrancy without messing up skin tones. There’s a “definition” slider, which brings out details—a good alternative to the sharpness slider.

The retouch brush has been given the ability to find edges. In the shot below, you can see how it removed the water stain easily, but preserved the all-important cable-knit pattern of my dad’s sweater-vest.

Most of the updated tools are great, but although red-eye reduction is finally automatic, it’s still better done by hand, or by an app other than iPhoto.

For starters, it only can automatically remove red-eye from faces it detects, and though the Faces feature is great, there are still problems with detection.

When it does detect them, it drops round black splotches onto each eye, like you see here, even if the eyes are half closed. Not only that, but there’s no way to adjust the opacity or hue of the dots, so everyone gets a seriously black eye, even when grey or maybe a nice brown would better suit them. I find that going in by hand and using a smaller dot works well enough for most cases, though if you’re planning to share or frame a shot, Photoshop or really any enthusiast-level photo editor would be a better option.

SLIDESHOWS & SHARING
The final major improvement of iPhoto ‘09 is the way you take photos out of iPhoto and into other realms. There are now six themes for animated slideshows, some zanier than others, like the acid-flashback “Shatter” or the mod cinematic “Sliding Panels.” You can add any music from iTunes that you want (DRM or not) though Apple pairs the themes themselves with great, recognisable music already, as you can hear in the following “Scrapbook” slideshow of my two cats, Wade and Wynona, which was made in a few clicks with default settings:

Tip: Select Fit Slideshow to Music Duration to avoid weird looping or awkward cutoffs. You might need to add photos or remove them, though, to modify the pacing.

The only weird thing is that once you’ve set up a slideshow, you have to exit out of it to export it. Just make sure your settings are fine, escape out of the full-screen slideshow interface, then, while you’re still in the album that is tied to that slideshow, choose Export… from the File menu. Clicking the Slideshow tab will give you the handsome menu chart you can see below, a wonderful help for saving at the right quality and resolution. (Honestly, I’d like to see more of this in QuickTime Pro and iMovie.)

The final component to iPhoto ‘09 is how it shares to Facebook and Flickr. As a father of an almost-1-year-old (who my wife won’t allow to appear on Giz), I have 7,000,000,000 photos on my MobileMe gallery, but nearly nothing on my Facebook page, because I forget to upload to it. Now, once I activate a gallery, I can just drag photos to it whenever I feel like it, just like I do with MobileMe. Let’s be honest here: Who needs MobileMe when you can use the same tool to upload to Facebook and Flickr? Wait, I know the answer to that: Grandparents need MobileMe. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, don’t worry. To quote Zep, your time is gonna come.

That’s it for me. I’ve aired my complaints here and there, but for the most part, I’ve banged my head against every part of this program, and I can safely say 90% of the additions are improvements. I am not annoyed at learning the new functionality, and I don’t think there’s a lot of dead weight either. I’d be happy to answer any questions, but hopefully most answers are already in the text above, as thorough as I aimed for it to be. Bottom line: All this, plus the improved iMovie ‘09 and the not-as-obviously-useful GarageBand and iWeb upgrades are all available in the same box, now, for $US79. It would be nice if you could just download an iPhoto-only licence for $US29 or something, but the whole iLife ‘09 kit ain’t bad. [iPhoto '09]

It should be noted that no Artist Lessons come free with iLife ‘09. So if you want Sting to teach you the way of the guitar (and I mean, who doesn’t?), you’ll need to purchase his lesson through the GarageBand Store. That’s not actually synonymous with the iTunes Store, as it works completely through GarageBand (which redirects you to the web). iTunes never actually enters the picture.

The downloads are sizable. Sting is 600MB, which shouldn’t be so surprising as multiple angles of high resolution video appear in two stitched-together 16×9 frames (32×9). (Unfortunately, there’s no angle for Sting’s butt.)

And my favourite part about the GarageBand store might be that it’s not “Roxanne” that you are downloading. It’s “Sting” that you are downloading. I’ve got you now, Sting!
The basic Artist Lesson comes in three parts: Learn Song, Play Song and Story. With Sting, you get two versions of Roxanne to learn (beginner and advanced levels). Through Learn Song, Sting gives you a brief rundown of each chord. Play Song is just a straight play-through of the song itself. And then the Story is just Sting talking about his inspiration behind the music, as if Sting could ever just talk.
In terms of actual time spent, that’s:

Learn Song
Beginner Lesson: 8 minutes
Advanced Lesson: 4 1/2 minutes

Play Song
Beginner Song: 3 minutes
Advanced Song: 3 minutes

Story
The Story: 5 minutes

Glancing at this lesson outline, you see that it’s not super long. The whole thing is about 24 minutes in all—if you go through basic and advanced levels. But what Apple did to expand this content is within GarageBand’s new Learn to Play interface. Some very well-thought options really stretch the lesson’s value beyond Sting’s charm.

Whether you want to look at realtime frets on a virtual guitar or just follow along with various notations (simple chords, chord grid, and TAB), you can really get in there and match the lesson to your training preferences.

Then you can do some other neat things to expand the content through integrated Practice Tools, including changing the playback speed so you can take your time with the chords (this option ditches Sting’s melodious vocals), work with a metronome, loop passages like the refrain or record your audio straight to the timeline to play back and remind you that, no, you are not Sting.
So is it worth $US5? It depends on your perspective. A song runs $US1 on iTunes (which most of us consider decent) while a 2-hour movie is $US10+. Technically, this is just 24 minutes of content. But given its clean presentation and the real replay value, at your own pace, alongside a celebrity to make it all a little sexier, I’m going with yes.

I was pretty certain the Artist Lessons were just a cheap and trendy Apple gimmick when announced at the Macworld. But there’s some real love in GarageBand’s Learn to Play interface that is well-suited for celebrities to show up and teach you to jam. Apple hasn’t committed to just how many Artist Lessons they will release moving forward, but if they can develop a reasonably sized library of musicians/music, I could see the platform growing into something very, very interesting.

Let’s face it, iMovie ‘08 was a step backwards for the iMovie software, so much so that Apple even made it a point to keep iMovie ‘06 available as a download well after the software had been updated. The biggest complaint with iMovie ‘08 was it lacked all the special features found in the previous version that made video editing so fun and easy.

iMovie ‘09 has regained most of the features that were lost in the ‘08 version and even has some new ones like video stabilisation, green screen and animated maps. The UI still lacks a dedicated timeline that most video editors are accustomed to using, but to make up for it iMovie ‘09 has new tools like the precision editor and advanced drag-and-drop capabilities.

Here’s a closer look at the new features of iMovie ‘09:

Precision Editor

Apple’s response to all the complaints about iMovie ‘08 lacking a timeline is this new precision editor window. Once you’re in a project, you select precision editor in a clips pop-up window, and the bottom half of iMovie becomes the editor. This tool is intended to help make more precise edits between two clips in your project, and does this by showing the two clips in an overlapping fashion. You simply click the spot in a clip you want to cut at and than iMovie automatically moves the clip to create the cut you want.

The window can also display audio tracks, effects and titles along side the video clips so it feels more like a timeline than a simple project window. There is also the option to move titles and change audio tracks of clips. The problem here is that the precision editor won’t let you do precise manipulation of a music track. This is frustrating, especially when you’re trying to line your video up with music. For the simple trimming of clips precision editor works pretty well—better that than nothing—but it’s still no substitute for a timeline.

Advanced Drag-and-Drop

After checking Show Advanced Tools under iMovie Preferences, this drag-and-drop tool shows much more features. In iMovie ‘08 dropping a clip from the library on-top of a clip in the project window simply inserts the library clip into the project. Now in iMovie ‘09 the same action brings up a pop-up menu filled with choices. It has options to replace the clip four different ways into your project or just to insert it the same way it would have in iMovie ‘08. The best features though are the Audio Only, Cutaway, Picture-in-Picture and Green Screen—all of which are completely new to iMovie ‘09.

Video Stabilisation

For the common shaky video clip using video stabilisation will impressively make the annoying camera movement disappear. iMovie ‘09 does this stabilisation in two steps. First it will analyse the video clip frame by frame and pixel by pixel, comparing one side of the frame to the other. Once it has analyzed the clip it applies a function that scales, rotates and moves the video based on the comparison. It zooms and trims the clip as much as it needs to apply the reverse movement of the camera shake and still not go outside the video frame. What’s more interesting is this video stabilisation is the same effect Apple uses in their professional visual effects program Shake.

Video Effects, Themes, Titles, and Transitions

Thank God or maybe Jobs, but video effects like speed, reverse play, and colour adjustments are all back in iMovie ‘09. The clip inspector window now has options for all these effects. There might not be as many effects as there were in iMovie ‘06 but there are some new ones, like the cool Sci-Fi and Heat Wave colour shifts.

Themes have also returned to iMovie. There are six different themes to choose from and each one puts a visual effect on the first and last clip in the project. The first will show an intro title like a scrap book with video playing on it and at the end it will insert a directed by title over your last clip. What’s cool is it will also add theme-related transitions to the transitions selection. Same goes for the titles. You only get about four new transitions and titles, but it’s nice to keep each element of the project in theme.

iMovie ‘08 only had 12 titles to choose from which was pretty pathetic, but now iMovie ‘09 has over 32. The titles aren’t as customisable as they were in iMovie ‘06 but with new additions like Clouds and Organic Main it might make up for it. As for transitions, only a few new ones have been added but nothing spectacular.

Maps and Backgrounds

The maps visual affects are pretty cool but not something that can be used with every project. There’s eight different moving maps to choose from—not just fake Indiana Jones maps but real ones that you can put your real locations on, as well as set your desired duration. When changing the destination points on a map, it conveniently pulls up a search window for city or airport, which makes finding a specific location very simple. After playing with these maps, I can say the best feature is the ability to add video effects. Since you can add the same effects to maps that you can to video clips, you can make Sci-Fi-looking worlds, like I did in the the video above.

It’s very sad that a background selection was not available in iMovie ‘08. Something so simple like a background is really essential to giving users the freedom to create any type of project they want. With an assortment of solid coloured and moving backgrounds, iMovie ‘09 now has the the option to a add a simple colour frame to the project. I for one am glad backgrounds are finally back.

Edit to Music

This is another new feature in iMovie ‘09 that is intended to assist at editing to music or making a music video. What this option does is allow the user to drop beat markers on a music track and then using those beat markers iMovie ‘09 will adjust the video clip durations to match the markers. This option will take some getting used but it seems like a valiant effort on Apple’s part to create something useful.

After playing around with the edit to music and green screen options I was able to create a fun little video. Before you start asking who the hell these kids are, all the sample video clips I used were provided by Apple so ask them.

Overall
Apple attempted to recreate iMovie for iLife ‘08, and in many people’s views, this was a massive failure. With iMovie ‘09, the company is really trying to make up for it—or perhaps prove that it had to tear down the previous system to make a decent new system. Most of the points that experienced enthusiasts complained about, like lack of creative features, has been addressed. But are the additions of features like video stabilisation and effects enough to make this iMovie
‘09 as useful as iMovie ‘06 was? At this point, I still think it’s not. The new tools like precision editor and drag-and-drop are nice needed additions for the layout but a timeline is still better. Bottom line is this: If you didn’t mind the new iMovie layout but wanted more creative tools, you got them. But if the lack of a timeline layout in iMovie ‘08 is what got your goat, you’re probably not going to like iMovie ‘09 either. Sorry. [iMovie '09]

Face Detection
Apple says it uses facial detection to determine the existence of faces, and then facial recognition to separate one person from the other. The problem is, that first step is far from a catch-all:

• It suffers from the typical face-detection problem of an incomplete picture—it won’t pick up all faces turned to the side, revealing just one eye. But far worse than that, it has a very hard time picking up faces tilted to either side, even if they’re otherwise perfectly clear and symmetrical. In other words, if the year is 2029 and Apple’s deathbots are coming for you, cock your head to the side, and they’ll just truck on by.

• The other problem iPhoto’s face detection suffers from is overconfidence. Sure, it makes sense that it picks up the faces of Mount Rushmore (well, at least Lincoln’s) but it’ll invent eyes and a nose from any old rumpled curtain or wood grain when it wants to.

Face Recognition
Once you get past the detection, the recognition kicks on. Some people are already saying it’s crap, but it’s remarkable when it wants to be. How do I know it’s working? Because on many occasions I have seen it correctly identify faces in frames in the background of a shot. But recognition has some hang-ups of its own:

• Once you name a person and click on their face on the corkboard, iPhoto suggests lookalikes, which you approve or reject by clicking. The first round of suggestions are mainly nonsense—iPhoto needs a lot of data to work correctly. Confirm the identity of your subject 10 or 20 times then click Done so the system can recalibrate.

• In the first round or two, recognition errs on the side of inclusion: A bald guy with a beard and glasses won’t just bring up similarly described gents, but will attract everybody who is bald, everybody who wears glasses and everybody with a beard. In my experiences, the images with the closest resemblance appear first, but as you scroll down, there are more and more random guesses. When it comes to babies, good luck—in those early rounds, iPhoto thinks all babies look alike. Again, you approve the suggested photos that are of the same person, and reject the ones that are not.

• Once you’ve done a round or two greenlighting more accurate shots of the person, it’s important to reject ones that are not. If you leave them there, iPhoto will keep on suggesting them. I found that, if two people look kinda alike, it pays to identify them both, and go back and forth between them confirming more and more shots, so iPhoto learns faster who belongs where.

• Baldness, hair colour and facial hair are all strong indicators for iPhoto. If your friend has a goatee or some kind of fancy moustache, don’t ever let him shave it off. Likewise, if your mum switches hairstylists and starts getting a different dye job, she may as well don full hunter’s camouflage. For some reason, iPhoto had an easier time discerning the blondes than the brunettes.

• People wearing glasses cause iPhoto to suggest matches of other people wearing glasses, in some cases people who are otherwise comically different. But iPhoto seems to have a lot of trouble with glasses in general, and can’t always grasp the glasses-wearer well enough to confidently suggest more of that same person. Sunglasses are obviously a problem for recognition, but people wearing sunglasses are often suggested for anyone wearing glasses, as if it was all the same to iPhoto.

• There are two kinds of recognition dead-ends you can encounter, where iPhoto won’t suggest any more photos for a person, even though you know they’re out there, and where iPhoto suggests an endless supply of random faces as potential matches, clearly unable to narrow it down further. Both are infuriating, and require you to go out and identify photos manually in hopes of jogging its memory.

• Pets are not guaranteed to work with recognition. I’m not going to slander the good people of MacLife by calling BS, but seriously, I can’t get neither cat nor dog to be recognised in any way by iPhoto, and I don’t believe it’s possible. You can identify them yourself, of course, but the reason it doesn’t pull up suggested shots containing the same furry animal is that it’s not looking at furry animals.

The Faces system is technically a time saver even when the recognition is not up to snuff, because by batching the more-or-less appropriate pictures together, you can tag them a lot faster than you otherwise could. There are plenty of user interface problems that I will address in the actual review, but in the meantime, I will leave you with this: After heavy testing for half a day, iPhoto became shockingly good at identifying my face. I can only imagine that, given more calibration and identified content, it will be better and better. My biggest fear is how many photos aren’t clearing the first hurdle—face detection—and are therefore left completely out of the system. Who would have thought that the recognition would be easier to nail than the detection? Not me. [iPhoto '09]

Even while Mark says that mine would only result in “Swedish Girl 1″, “Swedish Girl 2″, “Swedish Girl 3″, etc. in “Beach”, “Swimming Pool”, “Sauna” and “Bed”. [Thanks funman895]

Cool stuff: separating your photos by people, which you can then scrub (move your mouse) over and see all the images of them you have. iPhoto is smart enough to try and recognise which people are which with semi-decent accuracy, and you’ll have to confirm each one as you go. Once you’re done, you have a corkboard full of Polaroids of the people you know.

Geolocation is great for travelers, and if you go to a lot of different countries, your “Places” section will have a rich map made up of all the pins you’ve been to. You can fill in location data yourself, or if you have an iPhone or other GPS-enabled camera, it’s automatically filled in for you.

Other cool stuff is Facebook and Flickr integration (includes tagging as well), plus themed slideshows. [iPhoto]

iPhoto stuff:

Faces: Goes through and identifies distinct faces, automatically tagging them so you don’t have to slog through all your photos yourself.

Places: Geotagging, basically. iPhoto gives you a map with pins of where photos are taken. If your camera or iPhone encodes GPS info, iPhoto can figure out if the shot was taken at a particular landmark.

Facebook and Flickr support: Automatically upload your pics straight to your service of choice. (So glad to hear that one!) iPhoto will even grab Facebook image tags and use them in Faces. Flickr geo tags can be used in Places.

Themes: Page layouts for slideshows, with different fonts, caption boxes, etc., with crazy transitions. You can save slideshows to iPhone and iPod touch. It can detect faces in shots, so that they are centered during the slideshow. There’s a geo-tag slideshow called Travel Books that looks and acts like a scrapbook.

iMovie stuff: Sounds like they’re finally putting back some power functionality—let’s hope so…

Precision editor: It’s an expanded timeline for audio and video, for tighter cutting.

Advanced drag and drop: You can drag one video on top of another and get advanced context menus.

Themes: Select a theme and it automatically sets style for titles, transitions and credits.

Advanced travel maps: Put in starting and ending points, and it renders a 3D globe of where you traveled.

Video stabilisation: Helps you fix shaky shooting when you’re editing. Takes some processing time, but the results are amazing.

Other editing features: Skimming, seeing edits (before and after cuts), overlaying audio.

New project library: Organise videos in a more logical way with helpful thumbs.

Garageband stuff:
Yes, Garageband is still getting developed, even though I think it’s been a while since even Walt Mossberg recorded a solo project. (Knowing Pogue’s talents, he probably has a nice ProTools rig, or at least Logic.) Good thing this version is apparently looking for new musical recruits…

Learn to play: It has an instructional feature that helps teach you how to play instruments like guitar and piano.

Artist Lessons: Norah Jones, Sarah McLachlan, John Fogerty, Sting and other FOJ jam for your edification. Only $US5 a lesson. Hmmm.

There are also updates to iWeb and iDVD