<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; ibm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:39:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rat Brain Simulator Calls IBM&#8217;s Cat Brain Simulation Bogus</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/rat-brain-simulator-calls-ibms-cat-brain-simulation-bogus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/rat-brain-simulator-calls-ibms-cat-brain-simulation-bogus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stunts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cat brain simulation IBM supposedly pulled off has just been called out as a &#8220;PR stunt&#8221; by the leader of the Blue Brain project, who says that it&#8217;s all a &#8220;mass deception of the public.&#8221;
Henry Markram, the Blue Brain guy, says in an email to IBM&#8217;s CTO, that the project is not even close [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/ratcat.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ratcat.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/it-takes-147456-powerpc-processors-to-out-think-a-cat/">cat brain simulation</a> IBM supposedly pulled off has just been called out as a &#8220;PR stunt&#8221; by the leader of the Blue Brain project, who says that it&#8217;s all a &#8220;mass deception of the public.&#8221;<span id="more-368885"></span></p>
<p>Henry Markram, the Blue Brain guy, says in an email to IBM&#8217;s CTO, that the project is not even close to an ant&#8217;s brain and that the kind of simulations pulled off by IBM are trivial. He also calls the whole thing &#8220;stupid&#8221;, and &#8220;extremely harmful to the field&#8221;. [<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/semiconductors/devices/tech-talk/blue-brain-project-leader-angry-about-cat-brain">IEEE</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/blue-brain-scientist-denounces-ibms-claim-cat-brain-simulation-shameful-and-unethical">Popsci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/rat-brain-simulator-calls-ibms-cat-brain-simulation-bogus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cell Processor Is Going Extinct</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM&#8217;s shit-canning the Cell processor line &#8211; you know, the chip that&#8217;s in the PS3 and uh, Toshiba laptops and TVs &#8211; according to their VP of Deep Computing, making the current PowerXCell 8i the last of its ilk. 
[Fudzilla via MaxConsole]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/celllll.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_celllll.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>IBM&#8217;s shit-canning the Cell processor line &#8211; you know, the chip that&#8217;s in the PS3 and uh, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/toshiba_qosmio_g55_is_first_laptop_with_cell_processor_aboard-2/">Toshiba laptops</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-cell-regza-ps3-tv-sorts-shows-by-similarity/">TVs</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16530/38/">according to their VP of Deep Computing</a>, making the current PowerXCell 8i the last of its ilk. <span id="more-368738"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16530/38/">Fudzilla</a> via <a href="http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&#038;newsid=37958">MaxConsole</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Takes 147,456 PowerPC Processors To Out-Think A Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/it-takes-147456-powerpc-processors-to-out-think-a-cat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/it-takes-147456-powerpc-processors-to-out-think-a-cat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluegene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also on IBM&#8217;s cat-sized-brain-simulation materials list: 143 terabytes of RAM, miles and miles of cabling, a million watts of electricity, 6675 tons of air-conditioning equipment and an acre of floor space.
Cats: they&#8217;re kinda dumb. They only seem smarter than dogs because they&#8217;re not so friendly, and our society judges kindness harshly. It&#8217;s a true and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/catputer.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Also on IBM&#8217;s <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">cat-sized-brain-simulation</a> materials list: 143 terabytes of RAM, miles and miles of cabling, a <em>million</em> watts of electricity, 6675 tons of air-conditioning equipment and an acre of floor space.<span id="more-367800"></span></p>
<p>Cats: they&#8217;re kinda dumb. They only <em>seem</em> smarter than dogs because they&#8217;re not so friendly, and our society judges kindness harshly. It&#8217;s a true and interesting theory! Which is why, after mice, simulating a feline-sized brain on a BlueGene/P supercomputer was next on IBM&#8217;s to-do list. But for all the kitty talk here, this project wasn&#8217;t specifically about creating a computerised house pet; it&#8217;s part of a larger, ongoing project to eventually simulate a full human brain. The cat equivalency, derived from the number of virtual neurons and synapses the simulation can manage, at 1.6 billion and 9 trillion, respectively, just gives a sense of how far along the project is: Today, despite being the biggest simulated brain ever, it&#8217;s only capable of simulating the human visual cortex, or as PopMech so delicately puts it, &#8220;the wrinkly outer layer&#8221; of the human brain.</p>
<p>So how long before a supercomputer can simulate (roughly &mdash; since these computer simulations don&#8217;t have the same neural patterning and learning capabilities of a real brain, among other things) an entire human cortex? Weirdly soon, <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">says the project&#8217;s lead scientist</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> To [simulate a human cortex], he&#8217;ll need to find 1000 times more computing power. At the rate that supercomputers have expanded over the last 20 years, that super-super computer could exist by 2019. &#8220;This is not just possible, it&#8217;s inevitable,&#8221; Modha says. &#8220;This will happen.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p> People need to stop getting worked up about the future, honestly: Before we have to worry self-aware robot uprisings, we&#8217;re going to have to deal with decades of extremely dumb, extremely expensive fake pets. Enforced caution, I believe this is called. [<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">Popular Mechanics</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/it-takes-147456-powerpc-processors-to-out-think-a-cat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Fastest Supercomputer Also Has The Largest, Tackiest Case Mod</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/new-fastest-supercomputer-also-has-largest-tackiest-case-mod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/new-fastest-supercomputer-also-has-largest-tackiest-case-mod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cray xt5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is Jaguar, the new King of the Petaputerpower Hill, running at 1.75 petaflops-per-second. The Cray XT5 supercomputer was behind IBM&#8217;s Roadrunnner for more than a year, until some clever scientist decided to paint a running Jaguar all over it.
Then it surpassed IBM&#8217;s 10.4 petaflop/s supercomputer, achieving its 1.74 quadrillion floating points operation according to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_jaguar500.jpg" alt="" class="center" />This is <em>Jaguar</em>, the new King of the Petaputerpower Hill, running at 1.75 petaflops-per-second. The Cray XT5 supercomputer was behind IBM&#8217;s Roadrunnner for more than a year, until some clever scientist decided to paint a running Jaguar all over it.<span id="more-367252"></span></p>
<p>Then it surpassed IBM&#8217;s 10.4 petaflop/s supercomputer, achieving its 1.74 quadrillion floating points operation according to the Top500 Linpack benchmark. I mean, it was probably some extra CPUs coming online, but I&#8217;m pretty sure the main reason for the boost was that drawing.</p>
<p>Roadrunner actually took a dip from June&#8217;s 2009 test, which gave it 1.105 petaflops. That&#8217;s probably Wile E. Coyote&#8217;s fault. My recommendation to IBM: Paint flames on it to win the #1 spot back.</p>
<p>This is the current top 10:</p>
<p>1. Jaguar, Cray, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA (1.75 petaflop/s)<br />
2. Roadrunner, IBM, Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA (1.04 petaflop/s)<br />
3. Kraken XT5, Cray, National Institute for Computational Sciences, USA (832 teraflop/s)<br />
4. JUGENE, IBM, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Germany (825.5 teraflop/s)<br />
5. Tianhe-1, NUDT, National SuperComputer centre, Tianjin, China (563.1 teraflop/s)<br />
6. Pleiades, SGI, NASA Ames Research centre, USA (544.3 teraflop/s)<br />
7. BlueGeneL, IBM, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA (478.2 teraflop/s)<br />
8. BlueGene/P, IBM, Argonne National Laboratory, USA (458.61 teraflop/s)<br />
9. Ranger, Sun, Texas Advanced Computing centre, USA (433.20 teraflop/s)<br />
10. Red Sky, Sun, Sandia National Laboratories, USA (423.9 teraflop/s)</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.top500.org/list/2009/11/100">Top500 Supercomputers</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10397627-92.html">Cnet</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/new-fastest-supercomputer-also-has-largest-tackiest-case-mod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM And Intel Executives Arrested For Insider Trading</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ibm-and-intel-executives-arrested-for-insider-trading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ibm-and-intel-executives-arrested-for-insider-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six people in total were arrested today for making too much money too easily, among them executives from IBM and Intel. These guys made $US20 million in profits between January and July 2007 by passing insider info regarding Google, Hilton Hotels and Polycom onto a trader. Now they&#8217;re all facing multiple counts of conspiracy and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six people in total were arrested today for making too much money too easily, among them executives from IBM and Intel. These guys made <em>$US20 million</em> in profits between January and July 2007 by passing insider info regarding Google, Hilton Hotels and Polycom onto a trader. Now they&#8217;re all facing multiple counts of conspiracy and securities fraud. <span id="more-360905"></span></p>
<p>Considering the hedge fund manager behind the trades was ranked number 559 on Forbes&#8217; World Billionaire list, something tell me these guys could have done without the hassle and made a little less by trading the old-fashioned way: guessing. [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/16/ibm_intel_insider_trading/">The Register</a> and <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/16/the-rise-fall-of-a-billionaire-technology-hedge-fund-guru/">GigaOM</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/ibm-and-intel-executives-arrested-for-insider-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why IBM Is In Trouble With The Antitrust Police</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/why-ibm-is-in-trouble-with-the-antitrust-police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/why-ibm-is-in-trouble-with-the-antitrust-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fake Steve Jobs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course Microsoft is behind this government inquiry into IBM over antitrust issues. Ballmer is going nuts because he wants to own the glass house and for years he&#8217;s tried and failed to pry customers away from those fugly old mainframes. [FakeSteveJobs]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Microsoft is behind this government inquiry into IBM over antitrust issues. Ballmer is going nuts because he wants to own the glass house and for years he&#8217;s tried and failed to pry customers away from those fugly old mainframes. [<a href="http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/10/why-ibm-is-in-trouble-with-antitrust.html">FakeSteveJobs</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/why-ibm-is-in-trouble-with-the-antitrust-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ThinkPad&#8217;s $US100/Year Warranty Service Is Actually Pretty Good</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/thinkpads-us100year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/thinkpads-us100year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boing Boing Cory relates this tale using his $US100/year global support service for his Lenovo laptop and actually liking what eventually happened. Wha??
The Benjamin-a-year plan entitles the user to a service rep to come out next-day, no matter where on the planet you are &#8212; provided it&#8217;s somewhere reasonable, we&#8217;d assume. The tech guy came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lenovo.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Boing Boing Cory relates <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/08/in-praise-of-ibm-thi.html">this tale</a> using his $US100/year global support service for his Lenovo laptop and actually <em>liking</em> what eventually happened. Wha??<span id="more-359252"></span></p>
<p>The Benjamin-a-year plan entitles the user to a service rep to come out next-day, no matter where on the planet you are &mdash; provided it&#8217;s somewhere reasonable, we&#8217;d assume. The tech guy came by his office and fixed exactly what was wrong, basically doing an in-house call that Apple stores, even with their notoriously decent service, couldn&#8217;t match. I mean, <i>in-house</i>? And they even ignored the fact that he put Linux on there instead of his original Vista?</p>
<p>He does some caveats on his experience with IBM/Lenovo as a whole, and you can check that out over at BB. [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/08/in-praise-of-ibm-thi.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/thinkpads-us100year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battery 500 Project Wants To Make An 800km Range Battery</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/battery-500-project-wants-to-make-an-800km-range-electric-car-battery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/battery-500-project-wants-to-make-an-800km-range-electric-car-battery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM, Berkeley and five US National Labs are collaborating in a consortium to make an electric vehicle battery that goes all the way up to 800km per charge.
The project wants to make this happen by using a lithium-air battery, which&#8230;
 couple to atmospheric oxygen-essentially harnessing the oxygen in the air as the cathode of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lithium-air-battery-image-01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />IBM, Berkeley and five US National Labs are collaborating in a consortium to make an electric vehicle battery that goes all the way up to 800km per charge.<span id="more-357958"></span></p>
<p>The project wants to make this happen by using a lithium-air battery, which&#8230;<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> couple to atmospheric oxygen-essentially harnessing the oxygen in the air as the cathode of the battery. Since oxygen enters the battery on-demand, it offers an essentially unlimited amount of reactant, metered only by the surface area of its electrodes. IBM believes its nanoscale semiconductor fabrication techniques can increase the surface area of the lithium-air battery&#8217;s electrodes by at least 100 times, enabling them to meet the goals of the project.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> If you think the consortium will deliver a fantastic car by the time you need to trade in your current vehicle, you should hold off on getting so excited. IBM says it&#8217;s going to be another two years to even see if the lithium-air batteries can be used to make the goal happen. [<a href="http://www.smartertechnology.com/c/a/Technology-For-Change/Battery-500-Project-Charged-Up-over-AllElectric-Cars/">Smarter Technology</a> via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/10/01/0122257/Electric-Car-Nano-Batteries-Aim-For-500-Mile-Range?from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/battery-500-project-wants-to-make-an-800km-range-electric-car-battery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Videophones As Imagined In 1910 Still Had Dancing Webcam Girls</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-videophone-as-imagined-in-1910-still-had-dancing-webcam-girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-videophone-as-imagined-in-1910-still-had-dancing-webcam-girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video telephony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videophone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=354776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m ashamed to admit I was surprised someone had the videophone figured out as early as 1910. I also need to apologise to that old crazy guy in the park&#8212;your Prohibition-era webcam stories may have been true after all!
OK, it&#8217;s a sketch of a concept for what the French thought videotelephony would look like in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Video_telephony_as_imagined_in_1910.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Video_telephony_as_imagined_in_1910.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I&#8217;m ashamed to admit I was surprised someone had the videophone figured out as early as 1910. I also need to apologise to that old crazy guy in the park&mdash;your Prohibition-era webcam stories may have been true after all!<span id="more-354776"></span></p>
<p>OK, it&#8217;s a sketch of a concept for what the French thought videotelephony would look like in 2000, not a working videophone, but still it shows people were thinking big at the time.</p>
<p>In fact, even earlier in 1878 a wily inventor named George du Maurier actually published a conceptual upgrade to the era&#8217;s &#8220;speaking tubes&#8221; using this drawing below, which depicts a &#8220;viewing display&#8221; to go along with that generation&#8217;s literal series of tubes.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/800px-Telephonoscope.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_800px-Telephonoscope.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Only in 1927, with the help of IBM, would the traditionally accepted view of a &#8220;videophone&#8221; come to pass. The screen displayed at brisk 18 frames per second and was run using one those room-sized computers. The video was one-way, but the audio allowed then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover, seated in DC, to speak with an audience in New York City. [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videophone">Wikipedia</a> - Thanks, Blam!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/the-videophone-as-imagined-in-1910-still-had-dancing-webcam-girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenovo Goes All Multitouch On Us With The X200 Tablet, T400s</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/lenovo-goes-all-multitouch-on-us-with-the-x200-tablet-t400s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/lenovo-goes-all-multitouch-on-us-with-the-x200-tablet-t400s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo t400s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo x200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simpletap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t400s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x200]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most important thing to remember about the multitouch Apple tablet is that it doesn&#8217;t exist. So how about two multitouch laptops that do, from another hardware manufacturer that people actually like? Enter the Lenovo X200 tablet and T400s laptop.
Lenovo&#8217;s first forays into multitouch are somewhat fresh, but being Lenovos, utterly familiar. The updated X200 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/lenovotop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_lenovotop.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The most important thing to remember about the multitouch Apple tablet is that it doesn&#8217;t exist. So how about two multitouch laptops that <em>do</em>, from another hardware manufacturer that people actually like? Enter the Lenovo X200 tablet and T400s laptop.<span id="more-353586"></span></p>
<p>Lenovo&#8217;s first forays into multitouch are somewhat fresh, but being Lenovos, utterly familiar. The updated X200 is visually indistinguishable from <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/lenovo_thinkpad_x200_tablet_12_inches_of_touchtasticness-2/">its predecessor</a>, though it&#8217;s earned a healthy spec bump across the board: The Core 2 Duo processor is now available at up to 2.13GHz speeds, HDDs now reach up to 500GB while optional SSDs go all the way to 256GB, and two new screen options have been added to the mix: and ultrabright outdoor-friendly panel, and a two-finger multitouch screen&mdash;both at 12.1 inches.<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/lenovo-thinkpad-tablet.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_lenovo-thinkpad-tablet.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a><br />
Lenovo&#8217;s also dragged the much more powerful 14.1-inch T400s business portable into its multitouch experiment, leaving basically otherwise unchanged from when it was <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/lenovos-t400s-aims-for-the-line-between-portability-and-performance/">announced</a> back in June. However its capacitive touchscreen is itself a game changer as is capable of recognising for fingers on the screen. Don&#8217;t believe that?! Good thing we <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/lenovo-thinkpad-t400s-with-multitouch-review-four-finger-flicking-fun/">have a full review</a>.<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/504x_lenovo400s.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_504x_lenovo400s.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a><br />
So, about that multitouch option! It&#8217;s there! That alone counts for something, but Lenovo&#8217;s made sure to give the X200 and T400s something a little extra in the software department, hoping to set them apart from your (soon to be) average Windows 7 multitouch wares. It&#8217;s called SimpleTap, and it invokes a pretty little pop-up grid of common functions like Wi-Fi switching, adjusting brightness, changing volume and the like whenever you double-tab the screen.</p>
<p>The refreshed X200 and T400s will be available starting today, with the multitouch versions coming in at $US1654 and $US1999, respectively. Weirdly, SimpleTap won&#8217;t be available as a download until October 22nd, but you can <em>probably</em> find a way to enjoy your multitouch tablet without it. [<a href="http://Lenovo.com">Lenovo</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p> Lenovo Adds Touch of Simplicity to New MultiTouch Screen ThinkPad PCs</p>
<p>RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC – September 15, 2009: Lenovo today is bringing business users a new way to work with multitouch screen technology1 on the versatile and portable ThinkPad X200 Tablet PC and slim and powerful ThinkPad T400s laptop. Lenovo is also introducing SimpleTap, an application that brings simplicity to the multitouch screen experience.</p>
<p>&#8220;We see now as the right time for multitouch screens on PCs,&#8221; said Sam Dusi, vice president, worldwide ThinkPad product marketing, Lenovo. &#8220;With touch screens increasingly becoming part of more devices we use routinely and continued improvement of the technology including the integration of touch in the upcoming Windows 7 operating system, the environment for making touch part of our Tablet PC and ThinkPad T400s laptop experience couldn&#8217;t be better. We&#8217;ve also extended the touch experience with SimpleTap to make frequent hardware-based functions touch-enabled and simple.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lenovo also today announced a new defence against the sun for outdoor workers with a new super bright optional screen on the ThinkPad X200 Tablet.</p>
<p>Personalizing Productivity on the PC with Touch</p>
<p>Users can now interact with their ThinkPad PC in a more personal way with multitouch screen technology. Designed for highly mobile users, the optional multitouch screen ThinkPad X200 Tablet caters to individuals in fields such as sales, health care and education. Already supporting one finger touch, these users can now use two-finger touch to perform a variety of gestures, including pinching, zooming, tapping and flicking through documents, web pages and photos instead of using a mouse.</p>
<p>The high performance ThinkPad T400s laptop serves professionals in engineering and design. Now these users can manipulate four fingers on the ThinkPad T400s laptop&#8217;s optional multitouch screen to not only replace the mouse but transform the way they work. They can now use four fingers to manipulate objects, move images with two hands and even have another person touch the screen to collaborate simultaneously. As new multitouch applications are introduced, there will be new possibilities for using multitouch screen laptops.</p>
<p>Using advanced capacitive touch, the screens are sensitive and responsive to even the slightest touch of the finger. Lenovo also optimised the firmware to help compensate for slightly imprecise taps on the screen, such as when closing a window or navigating the Start menu, helping make navigation easier for Tablet users. To combat fingerprints, an anti-fingerprint coating helps keep smudges at bay and the screen clean. The multi-touch screens also allow users to enjoy ultra long battery life with up to nine hours on the ThinkPad X200 Tablet.2</p>
<p>With upcoming ThinkPad X200 Tablet models supporting the Microsoft Windows 7 operating system, these mobile users can also take advantage of improved predictive text over previous operating systems, improved handwriting recognition in more languages and formula input features for math and scientific equations.</p>
<p>More details on the ThinkPad T400s and X200 Tablet are available at www.lenovo.com.</p>
<p>Adding a &#8220;Touch&#8221; of Simplicity to Touch Screens</p>
<p>Touch screens are designed to make interaction with a PC natural and intuitive, however, often users must switch between touch screen gestures and pressing hardware buttons. Lenovo designed SimpleTap, a ThinkVantage Technology, to enable uninterrupted use of people&#8217;s touch screens by giving them access to hardware-based functions that may be more easily accessed via touch input. For Tablet users, that means staying in tablet mode longer while on-the-go, saving time and being more productive.</p>
<p>To use SimpleTap, simply double tap anywhere on the screen to launch the application. A clean and efficient grid of colorful and transparent square tiles, inspired by the classic 15 Puzzle, opens on top of the work beneath and allows users to choose several hardware-based functions including: turning on or off the wireless radio, ThinkLight and microphone, previewing the camera, enabling mute, adjusting the volume or screen brightness, locking the screen or putting the PC to sleep. To exit SimpleTap, just tap once anywhere on the screen to close the grid and continue working. As a quick access interface, SimpleTap allows users to get in, perform a function and get out quickly.</p>
<p>Designed to be highly customizable, individuals can create their own tiles to enhance their personal productivity. For example, a sales professional could create a tile that launches a sales presentation with just the tap of a finger. A health professional could similarly create a tile that pulls up a patient&#8217;s medical information instantaneously. Or a consumer could quickly access his or her favourite website. Users can arrange the tiles however they choose by dragging and grouping them together, and designed to be fun to use, the tiles can even be flicked around the screen.</p>
<p>Click here to see a video demonstration of SimpleTap and here to read more about the design and inspiration behind the application.</p>
<p>Brightening Tablet PC for Outdoor Light</p>
<p>To further extend tablet computing outdoors, users can now choose a super bright outdoor screen that displays images even in direct sunlight. For field engineers, sales professionals, students and others who work outside, outdoor viewability is critical. The new optional outdoor screen on the ThinkPad X200 Tablet offers excellent viewability with a bright 400 nit screen, low 1.2 percent reflectivity and wide viewing angle. Coated with a thin anti-reflective layer, the screen provides crisp and bright images that can easily be seen indoors or outdoors. Mobile workers can also stay productive with the Tablet&#8217;s all day battery life.</p>
<p>A photo of the ThinkPad X200 outdoor screen compared with a standard screen can be viewed here.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability3</p>
<p>The ThinkPad T400s with the multitouch screen and the ThinkPad X200 Tablet with the multitouch screen and the outdoor screen will be available starting immediately through business partners and www.lenovo.com. Pricing starts at approximately $US1,999 for the ThinkPad T400s with the multitouch screen and $US1,654 and $US1,704, respectively, for the ThinkPad X200 Tablet with the multitouch screen and outdoor screen. SimpleTap will be available for download after October 22.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/lenovo-goes-all-multitouch-on-us-with-the-x200-tablet-t400s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
