<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; i7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/i7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mac OS 10.6.2 Leaks New Core i5/i7 MacBook Pros?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mac-os-10-6-2-leaks-new-core-i5i7-macbook-pros/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mac-os-10-6-2-leaks-new-core-i5i7-macbook-pros/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;d be the most obvious leak in history, but the 10C531 build of OS 10.6.2 references the &#8220;MacBook Pro 6.1 and the MacBook Pro 6.1b&#8221;. All current Macbooks are strictly &#8220;5&#8243; status.
Of course, this appears to be confirmation of the obvious, that Apple will be updating their MacBook Pro line to include Core i5/i7 chips [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macproupdate102509.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macproupdate102509.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>It&#8217;d be the most obvious leak in history, but the 10C531 build of OS 10.6.2 references the &#8220;MacBook Pro 6.1 and the MacBook Pro 6.1b&#8221;. All current Macbooks are strictly &#8220;5&#8243; status.<span id="more-362751"></span></p>
<p>Of course, this appears to be confirmation of the obvious, that Apple will be updating their MacBook Pro line to include Core i5/i7 chips following the white MacBook&#8217;s Pro-level spec bump last week. (Apple will need to adopt these new chipsets to stay competitive.) Now we just need an answer to the far more important question: When? [<a href="http://www.applesana.es/foro/24/22604/nuevos-macbook-pro-6-1-horizonte-quad-core.html">Foro Applesana</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/25/evidence_points_to_new_macbook_pros_on_horizon.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/mac-os-10-6-2-leaks-new-core-i5i7-macbook-pros/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raw. Power. Aurora ALX Benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/raw-power-aurora-alx-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/raw-power-aurora-alx-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Oaten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gamers, could you handle this? An Aurora ALX with a Core i7 975 processor, X58 microATX motherboard and two ATI Radeon HD 5870&#8217;s in CrossFire. Is it fast? Pfft. Whaddyareckon?
Over at Hot Hardware, the reviewers of this Alienware dream machine are pretty clear about it.
It&#8217;s easy to see from the graphs that the parts used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Screeniealien.jpg" alt="Screeniealien" title="Screeniealien" width="423" height="418" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-356248" />Gamers, could you handle this? An Aurora ALX with a Core i7 975 processor, X58 microATX motherboard and two ATI Radeon HD 5870&#8217;s in CrossFire. Is it fast? Pfft. Whaddyareckon?<span id="more-356247"></span></p>
<p>Over at <a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Alienware-Aurora/">Hot Hardware</a>, the reviewers of this Alienware dream machine are pretty clear about it.</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s easy to see from the graphs that the parts used in this system are high-performance in every way. If money is no object, you can&#8217;t buy a faster platform than the Intel Core i7 975 with an X58 chipset motherboard.</p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s one of those graphs.<br />
<img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Graphscreenie.jpg" alt="Graphscreenie" title="Graphscreenie" width="553" height="587" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-356249" /></p>
<p>Basically, we&#8217;re talking about the meanest gaming rig on the market. Or at least, that&#8217;s how Hot Hardware sees it, and there&#8217;s not much room for debating their findings. But it&#8217;ll cost you plenty. $US4074.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Alienware-Aurora/">Hot Hardware</a>] via [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/24/4-000-alienware-aurora-alx-benchmarked-domination-this-world-h/">Egadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/raw-power-aurora-alx-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pioneer Offers More Power To You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/pioneer-offers-more-power-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/pioneer-offers-more-power-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Oaten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=354749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pioneer Computers Australia has announced what it claims is the most powerful 15.6-inch i7 laptop on the market with its DreamBook Power W86 i7.
The claim seems justified. We’re talking i7 Quad Core goodness and an nVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M with 1GB GDDR3 Video RAM on board, and that’s just to whet your appetite. All we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/Pioneer-600x259.gif" alt="Pioneer" title="Pioneer" width="600" height="259" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-354751" /><a href="http://www.pioneercomputers.com.au/">Pioneer Computers Australia</a> has announced what it claims is the most powerful 15.6-inch i7 laptop on the market with its DreamBook Power W86 i7.</p>
<p>The claim seems justified. We’re talking i7 Quad Core goodness and an nVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M with 1GB GDDR3 Video RAM on board, and that’s just to whet your appetite. All we want to know is can it handle Crysis?<br />
<span id="more-354749"></span></p>
<p><strong>Specifications</strong><br />
<strong>CPU</strong><br />
Intel® Core i7 720QM 1.60 GHz Turbo 2.80 GHz Quad Core 6 MB Cache 1333 MHz Processor<br />
Intel® Core i7 820QM 1.80 GHz Turbo 3.06 GHz Quad Core 8 MB Cache 1333 MHz Processor<br />
Intel® Core i7 920XM 2.00 GHz Turbo 3.20 GHz Quad Core 8 MB Cache 1333 MHz Processor<br />
Core Logic<br />
Intel® PM55</p>
<p><strong>Display</strong><br />
15.6&#8243; HD (16:9, 1366&#215;768) Crystal Bright Screen<br />
15.6&#8243; HD+(16:9, 1600&#215;900) Crystal Bright Screen</p>
<p><strong>Memory</strong><br />
Dual channel DDR3<br />
Two 204 Pin SODIMM sockets, support for DDR3 1333MHz<br />
Expandable memory up to 8GB, depends on 4GB/2GB SODIMM Module<br />
Video Controller<br />
nVIDIA® GeForce GTX 260M<br />
1GB GDDR3 Video RAM on board<br />
Support PCIe x16<br />
Microsoft® DirectX® 10 compatible<br />
MXM 3.0, Type B<br />
Support HDCP</p>
<p><strong>Video<br />
</strong>nVIDIA® GeForce GTX 280M<br />
1GB GDDR3 Video RAM on board<br />
Support PCIe x16<br />
Microsoft® DirectX® 10 compatible<br />
MXM 3.0, Type B<br />
Support HDCP</p>
<p><strong>Storage</strong><br />
One changeable 12.7mm(H) Super Multi / Blu-ray ODD, SATA interface<br />
One changeable 2.5&#8243; 9.5mm(H) HDD, SATA interface</p>
<p><strong>Sound System</strong><br />
High Definition Audio<br />
3D stereo enhanced sound system<br />
S/P DIF digital output<br />
Built-in microphone<br />
Built-in 2 speakers<br />
Keyboard &#038; Pointing Device<br />
Multi language<br />
Built in Touch pad with scrolling function</p>
<p><strong>I/O Ports</strong><br />
4x USB 2.0 ports<br />
1x eSATAport<br />
1x IEEE 1394a port<br />
1x DVI-I output port<br />
1x HDMI output port<br />
1x headphone jack (external 5.1CH audio output supported)<br />
1x microphone jack (external 5.1CH audio output supported)<br />
1x S/P DIF output jack<br />
1x RJ-11 jack<br />
1x RJ-45jack<br />
1x Line-in jack (external 5.1CH audio output supported)<br />
1x DC-in jack<br />
Card Reader<br />
7-in-1 Card Reader (MMC/RSMMC/SD/Mini SD/MS/MS Pro/MS Duo)</p>
<p><strong>Slots</strong><br />
One ExpressCard /54(/34) slot<br />
Two MiniCard slots (1st for WLAN module with PCIe interface, 2nd for 3.75G module with USB interface)<br />
Communication<br />
Built-in 56K FAX / modem<br />
Built-in 10/100/1000Mb Base-TX Ethernet LAN<br />
(Factory Option) Intel WiFi Link 5300 3&#215;3 802.11AGN Half MiniCard<br />
(Factory Option) WLAN 802.11b/g/n Half MiniCard module<br />
(Factory Option) Bluetooth™ V2.1+EDR module<br />
(Factory Option) 2.0M Video Camera<br />
(Factory Option) UMTS / HSPA 3.75G MiniCard module</p>
<p><strong>Power</strong><br />
Full Range AC adapter 120W AC in 100~240V, 50~60Hz, DC output 20V, 6.0A<br />
Removable Polima Smart Lithium-Ion battery pack 3800mAh<br />
Security<br />
Kensington® Lock<br />
(Factory Option) Fingerprint security<br />
O.S.<br />
Windows® VISTA™ (SP2)<br />
Windows®7<br />
Windows® 7 (64 bit) logo<br />
Dimension<br />
374(W) x 263.5(D) x 42(H) mm<br />
3.3kg with ODD and battery<br />
Factory Options<br />
Super Multi / Blu-ray ODD, SATA interface<br />
Intel® WiFi Link 5300 3&#215;3 802 11AGN Half MiniCard<br />
WLAN 802.11b/g/n Half MiniCard module<br />
Fingerprint security<br />
Bluetooth™ V2.1+EDR module<br />
2.0M pixels Video Camera<br />
UMTS / HSDPA 3.75G module, MiniCard module<br />
MOFA design (W860CUF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/pioneer-offers-more-power-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Core i5, i7 Chips: Nehalem Superpowers Cheaper Than Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/intel-core-i5-i7-processors-nehalem-superpowers-cheaper-than-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/intel-core-i5-i7-processors-nehalem-superpowers-cheaper-than-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lynnfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=352009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long and short of the new Lynnfield-based Intel Core i7 and Core i5 desktop chips: Nehalem power for cheaper than ever, and all you&#8217;re losing is triple-channel memory (in new i7 and i5) and hyperthreading (in i5). [Anandtech]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/LFDDieLayout.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_LFDDieLayout.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The long and short of the new Lynnfield-based Intel Core i7 and Core i5 desktop chips: <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/giz_explains_why_intels_core_i7_processor_is_a_beautiful_monster-2/">Nehalem power</a> for cheaper than ever, and all you&#8217;re losing is triple-channel memory (in new i7 and i5) and hyperthreading (in i5). [<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3634">Anandtech</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/intel-core-i5-i7-processors-nehalem-superpowers-cheaper-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manufacturers Mercilessly Cram Intel i7 Nehalem Processors Into Laptops</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/manufacturers_mercilessly_cram_intel_i7_nehalem_processors_into_laptops-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/manufacturers_mercilessly_cram_intel_i7_nehalem_processors_into_laptops-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/manufacturers_mercilessly_cram_intel_i7_nehalem_processors_into_laptops-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when ridiculously massive, fully loaded &#8220;desktop replacement&#8221; laptops from Alienware and the like were all the rage? Well, they never really went away; in fact, they&#8217;re reaching new heights of, eh, that thing that they strive for, whatever it is.


OEMs like AVADirect and Eurocom&#8212;who both must know that Intel will eventually release a mobile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when ridiculously massive, fully loaded &#8220;desktop replacement&#8221; laptops from Alienware and the like were all the rage? Well, they never really went away; in fact, they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1137503/oems-stick-core-i7-laptops">reaching new heights</a> of, eh, that thing that they strive for, whatever it is.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: laptops, i7, i7 laptops, intel, intel i7, intel i7 laptops, nehalem, nehalem laptops, processors, ridiculous things --><br />
<span id="more-336486"></span>
<p>OEMs like AVADirect and Eurocom&mdash;who both <em>must</em> know that Intel will<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/152473/intel_mobile_nehalem.html?tk=rss_news"> eventually release </a>a mobile version of the i7&mdash; are both offering Nehalem laptops, starting at around $US2500, that will do <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/giz_explains_why_intels_core_i7_processor_is_a_beautiful_monster-2.html">all those wonderful things that i7 processors can do</a>, centimeters from your nuts.[<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/165597/retailers_taking_orders_for_laptops_with_core_i7_chips.html">PCWorld</a> via <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1137503/oems-stick-core-i7-laptops">The Inq</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/manufacturers_mercilessly_cram_intel_i7_nehalem_processors_into_laptops-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notebook Makers Want Intel to Delay Superfast Nehalem Mobile Chips</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/notebook_makers_iwanti_intel_to_delay_superfast_nehalem_mobile_chips-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/notebook_makers_iwanti_intel_to_delay_superfast_nehalem_mobile_chips-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/notebook_makers_iwanti_intel_to_delay_superfast_nehalem_mobile_chips-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s another severe warping of the spacetime continuum caused by the financiapocalypse: Notebook makers want Intel to delay its crazyfast Nehalem-based mobile CPUs and chipsets. In other words, they want notebooks to be slower, longer.


The Calpella platform is scheduled for launch in July or August, just like Montevina (aka Centrino 2) did earlier this year. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/bananapancake.jpg" style="display:block;" />Here&#8217;s another severe warping of the spacetime continuum caused by the financiapocalypse: Notebook makers <em>want</em> Intel to delay its <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/giz_explains_why_intels_core_i7_processor_is_a_beautiful_monster-2.html">crazyfast Nehalem</a>-based mobile CPUs and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nextgen_intel_notebook_platform_calpella_details-2.html">chipsets</a>. In other words, they want notebooks to be slower, longer.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: intel, calpella, core i7, cpu, cpus, laptops, nehalem, notebooks, pc, pcs --><br />
<span id="more-321355"></span>
<p>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nextgen_intel_notebook_platform_calpella_details-2.html">Calpella platform</a> is scheduled for launch in July or August, just like Montevina (<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_intels_centrino_2-2.html">aka Centrino 2</a>) did earlier this year. But, because the Centrino 2 notebooks haven&#8217;t sold like hotcakes or any other kind of delicious breakfast pastry thanks to the economy and netbooks, notebook makers want more time to dump inventory. So, they want to see Calpella and its Nehalem CPUs (<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/intel_nahalem_chip_moniker_begets_core_i7_branding-2.html">aka Core i7</a> on the desktops) in October instead of the summer, meaning you&#8217;ve got a wait another few months to get your hands on all the zoomzoom power of Nehalem in a notebook. Laaaame. [<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090105PD206.html">Digitimes</a>, <em>Image: Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/yomi955/511832421/">yomi955</a></em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/notebook_makers_iwanti_intel_to_delay_superfast_nehalem_mobile_chips-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Studio XPS (Featuring Core i7) Reviewed: Kicks Arse, Saves Cash</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dell_studio_xps_featuring_core_i7_reviewed_kicks_arse_saves_cash-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dell_studio_xps_featuring_core_i7_reviewed_kicks_arse_saves_cash-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dell_studio_xps_featuring_core_i7_reviewed_kicks_arse_saves_cash-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the new desktops featuring Intel&#8217;s impressive Core i7 processor are straight-up gaming powerhouses, with pricetags to match. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so pleased to see a glowing review of Dell&#8217;s Studio XPS, which starts at a very affordable $US950. DesktopReview took it for a spin and found that, despite one or two small problems, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/ScreenHunter_02_Nov._22_18.51.jpg" style="display:block;" />Most of the new desktops featuring Intel&#8217;s impressive Core i7 processor are straight-up gaming powerhouses, with pricetags to match. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so pleased to see a glowing review of Dell&#8217;s Studio XPS, which starts at a very affordable $US950. DesktopReview took it for a spin and found that, despite one or two small problems, the Studio XPS is lightning fast and a great deal.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  --><br />
<span id="more-316298"></span>
<p>The quad-core processor was able to handle audio and video compression a few times faster than rival chips from AMD, and was the top of the heap in almost every benchmark they threw at it. Given it&#8217;s not a gaming computer, the Studio XPS did extremely well on the gaming benchmark, and yes, it can run Crysis without exploding. The downsides? The design isn&#8217;t heartstopping, as it looks like pretty much every other Dell machine out there, and DesktopReview thinks the hard drive configuration could be faster. But all in all, it&#8217;s a stellar buy if you want a fast-as-it-gets machine that can even do a little gaming on the side. [<a href="http://www.desktopreview.com/default.asp?newsID=537">DesktopReview</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/22/dells-core-i7-packin-studio-xps-hits-the-review-bench/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dell_studio_xps_featuring_core_i7_reviewed_kicks_arse_saves_cash-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falcon Northwest Mach V: Fastest PC Yet Runs Crysis at 60FPS</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/falcon_northwest_mach_v_fastest_pc_yet_runs_crysis_at_60fps-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/falcon_northwest_mach_v_fastest_pc_yet_runs_crysis_at_60fps-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/falcon_northwest_mach_v_fastest_pc_yet_runs_crysis_at_60fps-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Cnet test labs, the Falcon Northwest Mach V is the fastest PC on the planet, beating the Alienware Area-51 ALX. How fast you ask? How about being the first PC ever to hit 60 frames per second running Crysis on the highest graphics preset? Yes. That fast.


Cnet says that the Falcon Northwest Mach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/crysispc.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />According to Cnet test labs, the Falcon Northwest Mach V is the fastest PC on the planet, beating the Alienware Area-51 ALX. How fast you ask? How about being the first PC ever to hit 60 frames per second running Crysis on the highest graphics preset? Yes. <i>That</i> fast.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: pcs, crysis, desktop, falcon northwest mach v, fast, gaming, i7, intel --><br />
<span id="more-315634"></span>
<p>Cnet says that the Falcon Northwest Mach V has the latest and <i>bestest</i> combination of components there is, which is what makes it the fastest thing on chips:</p>
<p>• 3.79GHz Intel Core i7 965 Extreme Edition.<br /> • An Intel X58 chipset.<br /> • 12GB of 1,066MHz DDR3 SDRAM.<br /> • 2 x 1GB ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2<br /> • 1TB 7,200RPM Hitachi hard drive.<br /> • 80GB Intel X-25M solid-state drive.</p>
<p>All this comes at a pretty hefty $US8,028 price tag, including the Ferrari red paint job, which is a $US500 option. Unfortunately, the automotive-class red paint job reportedly helps you get at least three extra frames per second in Crysis. Fortunately, there&#8217;s a potential DIY fix to save those $US500: Apply a few adhesive flames to the chassis, and Bob&#8217;s your uncle. [<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/desktops/falcon-northwest-mach-v/4505-3118_7-33370265.html?subj=re">Cnet</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/falcon_northwest_mach_v_fastest_pc_yet_runs_crysis_at_60fps-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s Core i7 Chips Get Prodded, Poked and Compared: Good, But Expensive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/intels_core_i7_chips_get_prodded_poked_and_compared_good_but_expensive-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/intels_core_i7_chips_get_prodded_poked_and_compared_good_but_expensive-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kit Eaton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/intels_core_i7_chips_get_prodded_poked_and_compared_good_but_expensive-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel&#8217;s Core i7 chips, otherwise known as Nehalem, are here and over at Bit-Tech they&#8217;ve got hold of an i7 965, 940 and 920 and run them through a testing process to check if they&#8217;re as crazy fast as we&#8217;d heard they were. And the results are that yes, indeed they are. If you&#8217;re a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/corei7.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />Intel&#8217;s Core i7 chips, otherwise known as <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/nehalem/">Nehalem</a>, are here and over at <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2008/11/03/intel-core-i7-920-945-965-review/1">Bit-Tech</a> they&#8217;ve got hold of an i7 965, 940 and 920 and run them through a testing process to check if they&#8217;re as <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/crazy_fast_intel_bloomfield_processor_getting_early_september_release-2.html">crazy fast</a> as we&#8217;d heard they were. And the results are that yes, indeed they are. If you&#8217;re a power user, doing fast video conversions or otherwise stressing your processor to the max across all its cores and with hyper-threading, then the top-end 965 is a beast of a chip, apparently. But at $US999 it&#8217;s steep. Bit-Tech rekons if you&#8217;re an enthusiast or a gamer you&#8217;re probably better off looking at the low-end 920 chip, which still delivers quite a punch for a mere $US284. Hit the link for the full review, processor fans. [<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2008/11/03/intel-core-i7-920-945-965-review/1">Bit-Tech</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: intel, chips, computing, core, core i7 reviews, gadgets, i7, nehalem, processors, review --><br />
<span id="more-313341"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/intels_core_i7_chips_get_prodded_poked_and_compared_good_but_expensive-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
