<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hollywood Is All Over The Head-Mounted Canon5D Mark II</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/hollywood-is-all-over-the-head-mounted-canon5d-mark-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/hollywood-is-all-over-the-head-mounted-canon5d-mark-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon 5d mark ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helmet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine the kind of HD magic you could film with a Canon5D MK II mounted on a helmet. The possibilities have not been lost on Hollywood apparently.

Rodney Charters, the Director for Photography on 24 expressed interest in it via an email sent to planet5D. He also believes that it may have been used on Ironman, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_5d_helmet_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Imagine the kind of HD magic you could film with a Canon5D MK II mounted on a helmet. The possibilities have not been lost on Hollywood apparently.<span id="more-342162"></span></p>
<p><object width="500" height="318"><param name="movie" value="http://www.planet5d.com/ria/ShizVidz-2008120101.swf"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="flashVars" value="s=ZT0xJmk9NTk2MzE4MjQ2Jms9a3FYTEgmYT03MzU0NjAzX0I2N1F3JnU9UGxhbmV0NUQ="><embed src="http://www.planet5d.com/ria/ShizVidz-2008120101.swf" width="500" height="318" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></object></p>
<p>Rodney Charters, the Director for Photography on <em>24</em> expressed interest in it via an email sent to <a href="http://blog.planet5d.com/2009/07/canon5d-mark-ii-helmet-mount-for-panavision-and-hollywood/">planet5D</a>. He also believes that it may have been used on <em>Ironman</em>, although he has no confirmation on that. Either way it would make for some interesting fight and POV scenes, not to mention comical situations on set for anyone trying to pass through a doorway with one of these on. [<a href="http://blog.planet5d.com/2009/07/canon5d-mark-ii-helmet-mount-for-panavision-and-hollywood/">planet5D</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/hollywood-is-all-over-the-head-mounted-canon5d-mark-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court OKs DVR-In-The-Cloud Concept</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/supreme-court-oks-dvr-in-the-cloud-concept/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/supreme-court-oks-dvr-in-the-cloud-concept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood apparently tried to make a federal case about Cablevision launching a virtual DVR, a cable box with no local hard drive that still lets you &#8220;record&#8221; shows to watch later, and even fast forward through commercials. Hollywood studios got mad because they deemed it unfair re-broadcasting of content. The Supreme Court looked at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood apparently tried to make a federal case about Cablevision launching a virtual DVR, a cable box with no local hard drive that still lets you &#8220;record&#8221; shows to watch later, and even fast forward through commercials. Hollywood studios got mad because they deemed it unfair re-broadcasting of content. The Supreme Court looked at the case and took a pass&mdash;by not hearing it, they are allowing Cablevision and others to proceed with development unhindered. I like the concept of a driveless DVR, but I don&#8217;t like the cable company keeping my shows&mdash;stuff I&#8217;ve already recorded&mdash;under lock and key. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/technology/30cable.html">NY Times</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/supreme-court-oks-dvr-in-the-cloud-concept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Blockbuster: Godawful Wolverine Downloaded Over 4 Million Times</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_new_blockbuster_godawful_iwolverinei_downloaded_over_4_million_times-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_new_blockbuster_godawful_iwolverinei_downloaded_over_4_million_times-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolverine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_new_blockbuster_godawful_iwolverinei_downloaded_over_4_million_times-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw Wolverine in theatres. I paid $US8 for my ticket and $US5 for popcorn, heavy on the heart attack sauce. But I still don&#8217;t know why 4 million people downloaded that piece of poo.


The movie industry would like to tell you that those 4 million downloads are totally equivalent to 4 million lost tickets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/wolvieaaaaah.jpg" alt="" />I saw <em>Wolverine</em> in theatres. I paid $US8 for my ticket and $US5 for popcorn, heavy on the heart attack sauce. But I still don&#8217;t know why 4 <em>million</em> people <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i4b78d64d1d19f896755bb07f108f27f2">downloaded that piece of poo</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: piracy, bittorrent, downloads, movies, mpaa, torrent, wolverine --><br />
<span id="more-335536"></span>
<p>The movie industry would like to tell you that those 4 million downloads are <em>totally equivalent</em> to 4 million lost tickets at an average cost of 7 bucks a piece according to the Hollywood Reporter&#8217;s figures, knocking about $28 million off its weekend total, which was a still respectable $US85 million, though less than X3&#8217;s opening weekend gross of $US103 million.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not. Even discounting the few people brave enough for a repeat viewing of this crime against decency&mdash;adamantium bullets, really?&mdash;pirates who are piratey pirates were never going to pay to see it anyway, and the incredible download numbers undoubtedly drew more of them in. It&#8217;s like a YouTube video with 2 million views. It makes you more likely to click.</p>
<p>But 4 million is still something of a watershed number. <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/how_to_create_a_blockbuster_movie_in_todays_world_leak_it_to_bittorrent-2.html">1 million downloads</a> was pretty damn good. 4 million is berzerk. <em>The Dark Knight</em> <a href="http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=2370">hasn&#8217;t even sold 4 million copies</a> on Blu-ray, and it&#8217;s like the <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/12/10/the-dark-knight-breaks-blu-ray-sales-record-in-one-day/">biggest thing ever</a> on the format.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fairly incredible buzz for a thoroughly lackluster movie that&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/wolverine/">bona fide wolverine fart</a> in summer filled with actually <em>good</em> blockbusters, hype it likely would&#8217;ve never achieved otherwise. And being able to talk about all those millions of downloads in the press is just one slice of this illicit hype machine. (If Fox was smart, they would include the bootleg workprint as a special feature on the Blu-ray.)</p>
<p>Would it have made more than $US85 million if it hadn&#8217;t leaked? Maybe. But I kind of doubt it. Would fewer people have seen it? Definitely. [<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i4b78d64d1d19f896755bb07f108f27f2">Hollywood Reporter</a> via <a href="http://digg.com/movies/Wolverine_Downloaded_a_Whopping_4_MILLION_Times">digg</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_new_blockbuster_godawful_iwolverinei_downloaded_over_4_million_times-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s Girlfriend Experience Released to Amazon Before Theatres</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/steven_soderberghs_igirlfriend_experiencei_released_to_amazon_before_theatres-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/steven_soderberghs_igirlfriend_experiencei_released_to_amazon_before_theatres-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/steven_soderberghs_igirlfriend_experiencei_released_to_amazon_before_theatres-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar-winning director Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s new movie breaks some major Hollywood rules, and not just because it stars porn actress Sasha Grey. It&#8217;s also available now on Amazon a full 3 weeks before it hits theaters.


It&#8217;s not the first time Soderbergh has experimented with different ways of releasing his films. His 2006 film Bubble was released [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/the_girlfriend_experience.jpg" alt="" />Oscar-winning director Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s new movie breaks some major Hollywood rules, and not just because it stars porn actress Sasha Grey. It&#8217;s also available now on Amazon a full 3 weeks before it hits theaters.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: movies, amazon, digital distribution, downloads, film, gallery, hollywood, piracy, sasha grey, steven soderbergh, the girlfriend experience --><br />
<span id="more-335342"></span>
<p>It&#8217;s not the first time Soderbergh has experimented with different ways of releasing his films. His 2006 film <i>Bubble</i> was released simultaneously on HDNet Movies and to theatres, with a DVD release coming a mere 4 days later.</p>
<p>Traditionally, studios have been reluctant to dabble in simultaneous releases because they worry that people will skip the theatres to watch from the comfort of their own home. But as piracy and digital downloads become the norm, that choice isn&#8217;t really in the studio&#8217;s hands anymore. Yet people still go see movies in theatres for the experience, so why not make some cash via digital sales and rentals at the same time for people who wouldn&#8217;t go to the theatre in the first place?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting experiment, one that may become more and more common in the future. It makes sense especially with independent films that are traditionally given limited releases to theatres. And movies staring porn stars, as it&#8217;s awkward to jerk off in a movie theater.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('girlfriendexperience', 4, ''); </script> [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Girlfriend-Experience-Pre-Theatrical-Rental/dp/B00284GCEE/ref=amb_link_84223211_?ie=UTF8&#038;me=A1IYIN71UJW258&#038;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&#038;pf_rd_s=right-1&#038;pf_rd_r=094DGX19NCGVZCXMSJQ5&#038;pf_rd_t=101&#038;pf_rd_p=475738971&#038;pf_rd_i=16261631">The Girlfriend Experience on Amazon</a>; <a href="http://fleshbot.com/5229696/steven-soderberghs-the-girlfriend-experience-the-fleshbot-review">Fleshbot Review (NSFW)</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/steven_soderberghs_igirlfriend_experiencei_released_to_amazon_before_theatres-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Film Kit: Lights, Camera, Sit Alone at Your Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/hollywood_film_kit_lights_camera_sit_alone_at_your_computer-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/hollywood_film_kit_lights_camera_sit_alone_at_your_computer-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/hollywood_film_kit_lights_camera_sit_alone_at_your_computer-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So things didn&#8217;t work out with the screenplay. And that backlot audition turned out to be a backseat party for two. But don&#8217;t give up your dreams so quickly! It&#8217;s a known fact that Matt Damon and Ben Affleck had to open mouth kiss for 5 seconds to get Good Will Hunting produced&#8212;in front of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/usbwebvar_lg.jpg" class="left"/>So things didn&#8217;t work out with the screenplay. And that backlot audition turned out to be a backseat party for two. But don&#8217;t give up your dreams so quickly! It&#8217;s a known <em>fact</em> that Matt Damon and Ben Affleck had to open mouth kiss for 5 seconds to get Good Will Hunting produced&mdash;in front of girls even! So pick up this Hollywood Film Kit and get back on the horse. The USB Spotlight will make your eyes sparkle as &#8220;producers&#8221; get a full look at your &#8220;talents&#8221; compliments of the simulated 35mm webcam and your AdultFriendFinder account. $US25. [<a href="http://www.iwantoneofthose.com/gadgets-gizmos/usb-gadgets/usb-hollywood-film-kit/index.html">iwantoneofthose</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/01/usb-film-kit-lets-you-act-like-a-star/">OhGizmo</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: usb, hollywood film kit, webcam --><br />
<span id="more-308583"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/hollywood_film_kit_lights_camera_sit_alone_at_your_computer-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Teams With AT&amp;T and Others In Possible Packet-Filtering Coalition</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/hollywood_teams_with_att_and_others_in_possible_packetfiltering_coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/hollywood_teams_with_att_and_others_in_possible_packetfiltering_coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/hollywood_teams_with_att_and_others_in_possible_packetfiltering_coalition.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you P2P fans may want to know about a new coalition called Arts + Labs. It may sound like some kind of open-source hippie think tank, but it&#8217;s actually a powerful alignment of film and music copyright owners (NBC Universal, Viacom and the Songwriters Guild of America) and tech firms and ISPs (Microsoft, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/Two_Towers_Filter.jpg" class="left"/>Some of you P2P fans may want to know about a new coalition called Arts + Labs. It may sound like some kind of open-source hippie think tank, but it&#8217;s actually a powerful alignment of film and music copyright owners (NBC Universal, Viacom and the Songwriters Guild of America) and tech firms and ISPs (Microsoft, Cisco Systems and AT&#038;T). It&#8217;s a group that could put together a pretty serious anti-piracy system without much trouble. Saul Hansell at the <i>NY Times</i> says the group claims that &#8220;network operators must have the flexibility to manage and expand their networks to defend against net pollution and illegal file trafficking which threatens to congest and delay the network for all consumers.&#8221; Hansell interprets this as a call to filter packets, and put the kibosh on any dubious transfers.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: copyright protection, "nbc, arts + labs, arts labs, at&#038;t, att, cisco, copyright, isps, microsoft, net neutrality, songwriters guild of america, universal, viacom --><span id="more-307859"></span>
<p>Although the intentions aren&#8217;t yet explicit, most of the coalition members have openly opposed net neutrality legislation and are in favour of allowing ISPs to have the &#8220;freedom&#8221; to monitor their customers. But Microsoft is a little bit more squirmy on the subject. Thomas C. Rubin, Microsoft&#8217;s chief counsel for intellectual property strategy, told Hansell:<br /> <br />
<blockquote>We think that this is an opportunity to work with leaders across industries to put our heads together to discuss the opportunities that exist to facilitate the promotion of the availability of legitimate content on the Internet. We are not in favour of filtering at the network level.<br /> <br />
<blockquote>Hopefully that is enough of a bulwark against rampant abuse of power. As the forces align, it&#8217;s important for pirates and non-pirates alike to keep watch. Meantime, check out the <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/hollywood-tries-to-get-support-for-having-isps-block-copyrighted-files/">full article</a>. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/hollywood-tries-to-get-support-for-having-isps-block-copyrighted-files/">NYT</a>]</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/hollywood_teams_with_att_and_others_in_possible_packetfiltering_coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Smart&#8217;s Swiss Army Knife Has Working Crossbow, Flamethrower and Blowgun</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_iget_smartis_swiss_army_knife_has_working_crossbow_flamethrower_and_blowgun_-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_iget_smartis_swiss_army_knife_has_working_crossbow_flamethrower_and_blowgun_-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[props]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swiss army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner bros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_iget_smartis_swiss_army_knife_has_working_crossbow_flamethrower_and_blowgun_-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were surprised to learn that one of the stars of Steve Carell&#8217;s Get Smart is actually a Swiss Army knife, albeit one whose talents are slightly more impressive than your own trusty multi-tool. It&#8217;s got your scissors, saw, magnifying glass and can opener, but how about a flame thrower that shoots six feet? Or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/Get_Smart_Swiss_Army_Knife.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/>We were surprised to learn that one of the stars of Steve Carell&#8217;s <i>Get Smart</i> is actually a Swiss Army knife, albeit one whose talents are slightly more impressive than your own trusty multi-tool. It&#8217;s got your scissors, saw, magnifying glass and can opener, but how about a flame thrower that shoots six feet? Or a crossbow with stow-away bolts? Or a blowgun with its own fold-out sight? The crazy part is, even though this thing is a movie prop, the producers had to make it really work. We scored exclusive schematics of the knife itself, and caught up with prop-meister <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0928807/">Tim Wiles</a> to learn how the thing was made fully operational for the cameras.
<div class="photoGallery"><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy0_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart Swiss Army Blowgun wm.jpg" rel="lightbox[1374]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart Swiss Army Blowgun wm.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy0_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy1_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart Swiss Army Crossbow - open wm.jpg" rel="lightbox[1374]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart Swiss Army Crossbow - open wm.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy1_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy2_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart Swiss Army Crossbow wm.jpg" rel="lightbox[1374]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart Swiss Army Crossbow wm.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy2_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy3_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart Swiss Army Flame Thrower wm.jpg" rel="lightbox[1374]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart Swiss Army Flame Thrower wm.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartSwissArmy/GetSmartSwissArmy3_small.jpg" /></a></div>
</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories:  exclusive ,  feature ,  get smart ,  hollywood ,  props ,  steve carell ,  swiss army ,  swiss army knife ,  top ,  warner brothers  --><br />
<span id="more-293332"></span>
<p>In Hollywood, the same rule that applies to babies and cars applies to key props: There has to be more than one. In the shooting of <i>Get Smart</i>, there were a total of seven functional Swiss Army knives, three with working crossbows, and two each with working flamethrowers and blowguns. There were also a dozen or so rubber versions for shots where the knife flies through the air or takes some other kind of a beating.</p>
<p>Wiles&mdash;whose prop mastery has been seen in everything from <i>Magnolia</i> to <i>You Don&#8217;t Mess With the Zohan</i>, and whose inventory includes USPS-friendly sex dolls, magic remote controls, a diver stuck in a tree and a &#8220;crazy hair stimulator&#8221; for Jack Nicholson&mdash;was naturally excited to be on the <i>Get Smart</i> gig. As you&#8217;d expect, the script called for numerous gadgets:</p>
<p>• Dental floss detonator, explosive floss<br /> • Tooth transmitters (&#8221;We got fake teeth from a dental supply company, embedded microchips and hollowed them out to make them look like toothcaps,&#8221; says Wiles.)<br /> • Bracelet receiver made from an existing Marc Jacobs watch, with a slide-out antenna and compartment for wireless bugs<br /> • Smoking compacts<br /> • Glowing coin transmitter<br /> • Piano bomb with countdown timer<br /> • Violin tuning peg laser for cutting holes in walls<br /> • And of course, the Cone of Silence</p>
<p>But it was the knife that was the centre of Wiles&#8217; attention. He got clearance from the companies who own the Swiss Army licence (Wenger and Victorinox) to feature a souped-up version in the movie. &#8220;Then we bought 50 or 60 big fat Swiss Army knives and gutted them&mdash;took them apart and built frames to house the mechanisms to do what we needed it to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>As you can see in the sketches above, the crossbow concept requires a little &#8220;suitcase&#8221; for the bolts, while the flamethrower makes sense only when the knife has its own propane tank, so Wiles had to add both, on either side.</p>
<p>When it came time to deploy the functional units for scenes, some trickery was still required. For instance, the flamethrower did manage to shoot a jet of fire four to six feet, says Wiles, but it was assisted by a line to an actual propane tank that was hiding just off-camera and controlled by &#8220;the effects guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The crossbow totally worked, but its bolts were rubber tipped. Even though Carell appears in the stills below punctured with bolts, Wiles and the crew assumed the real ones probably wouldn&#8217;t have done too much damage. Nevertheless, on the day of shooting, the crossbow turned out to be <i>all too powerful</i>, and they had to &#8220;back off the tension&#8221; before someone lost an eye.</p>
<p>&#8220;Even though they were rubber harpoons, they still hurt if you got hit by them. In that confined space [an aeroplane bathroom], while we were shooting, they ricochet all over the place,&#8221; says Wiles.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to know that Hollywood isn&#8217;t all CGI these days, and that actors are willing to put their lives (or at least their eyes) on the line for a solid visual gag. Below, you can see the knife featured in its various configurations&mdash;and hopefully in the movie, which opens on Friday, June 20, we&#8217;ll get to see the knife (or knives) fully in action. Now, if they could just install an electric screwdriver, I&#8217;d be sold. [<a href="http://getsmartmovie.warnerbros.com/">Get Smart</a>]</p>
<p>
<div class="photoGallery"><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills0_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Blowgun" rel="lightbox[1380]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Blowgun" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills0_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills1_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Flame Thrower" rel="lightbox[1380]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Flame Thrower" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills1_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills2_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Crossbow 2" rel="lightbox[1380]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Crossbow 2" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills2_small.jpg" /></a><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills3_medium.jpg" title="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Crossbow 1" rel="lightbox[1380]"><img width="110" height="110" alt="Get Smart - Swiss Army Knife Crossbow 1" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/gallery/GetSmartStills/GetSmartStills3_small.jpg" /></a></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/_iget_smartis_swiss_army_knife_has_working_crossbow_flamethrower_and_blowgun_-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Attacking Film Grain For Blu-ray</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/hollywood_attacking_film_grain_for_bluray-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/hollywood_attacking_film_grain_for_bluray-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/hollywood_attacking_film_grain_for_bluray-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me, the first &#8220;ooooh&#8221; moment when I got my first HDTV was watching SportsCenter&#8230;and I don&#8217;t even watch sports. Never before had I seen such a crisp, vibrant image in my life. It didn&#8217;t look real. It looked more than real.


My second &#8220;ooooh&#8221; moment was exactly the opposite. I was watching a movie on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/Casablanca%20copy.jpg" class="left"   style="display:block;"/>For me, the first &#8220;ooooh&#8221; moment when I got my first HDTV was watching SportsCenter&#8230;and I don&#8217;t even watch sports. Never before had I seen such a crisp, vibrant image in my life. It didn&#8217;t look real. It looked <em>more</em> than real.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: bad news, blu-ray, gadgets, hollywood, home entertainment, movies --><br />
<span id="more-290394"></span>
<p>My second &#8220;ooooh&#8221; moment was exactly the opposite. I was watching a movie on something like HDnet. And I was worried for a moment&mdash;what were all those little spots on my television screen? I looked closer and realised that it was film grain. And then I <em>absolutely knew</em> that my TV had been a good &#8220;investment.&#8221; But not all people feel like I do. And Hollywood is accommodating them for Blu-ray releases.</p>
<p>The Digital Bits reports that to accommodate for those <strike>with no taste</strike> who hate film grain, studios are doing one of two things to back-catalog Blu-ray rereleases:</p>
<p>1. Sharpening film to death through copious Digital Noise Reduction<br /> 2. Simply not releasing especially grainy movies at all</p>
<p>Film grain is not a problem to be eliminated. While sometimes a production limitation altering decisions on film stock and lighting requirements, it&#8217;s long been seen as another tool in a cinematographer&#8217;s arsenal. And, ironically enough, it&#8217;s important enough to the viewing experience that digital productions tend to <em>add</em> the stuff for theatre release.</p>
<p>Part of what&#8217;s amazing about new display and codec technologies is that the consumer can come closer than ever to <em>re-creating</em> the theatre experience at home. When I saw film grain so clearly on my screen for the first time, I bought in to that truly incredible and empowering phenomenon, a sort of technological manifestation of divine marketing BS. And I realised that, no matter what better-than-HD technologies were around the corner, we were quickly approaching the point of diminishing returns. Our eyes would be bested by our displays. There&#8217;d be more information than we could see.</p>
<p>But if we destroy a by-product so intrinsically (and often artistically) linked to the film medium, our enjoyment of film will become said case of diminishing returns. So let&#8217;s just not do that. [<a href="http://www.thedigitalbits.com/mytwocentsa155.html#grain">The Digital Bits</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/05/hollywood-studi.html">Gadget Lab</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/hollywood_attacking_film_grain_for_bluray-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is This the Ultimate Outdoor Home Theater? Answer: Yes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/is_this_the_ultimate_outdoor_home_theater_answer_yes-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/is_this_the_ultimate_outdoor_home_theater_answer_yes-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Addy Dugdale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/is_this_the_ultimate_outdoor_home_theater_answer_yes-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nestled in the hills above Hollywood is a glass house that boasts one of the coolest open-air home theaters I&#8217;ve ever seen. You can flop on one of the sofas and watch a movie on an enormous screen, one of the outer walls of the guesthouse of the Hagy Belzberg-designed Skyline residence. A couple more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/driveinhouse.jpg" class="left"/>Nestled in the hills above Hollywood is a glass house that boasts one of the coolest open-air home theaters I&#8217;ve ever seen. You can flop on one of the sofas and watch a movie on an enormous screen, one of the outer walls of the guesthouse of the Hagy Belzberg-designed Skyline residence. A couple more mouthwatering pics after the jump.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: architecture, california, frank gehry, hagy belzberg, hollywood, home theater, outdoor home theater --><br />
<span id="more-276454"></span>
<p><img alt="driveinhouse1.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/driveinhouse1.jpg" width="680" height="329" class="center"/><img alt="1183414031.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/1183414031.jpg" width="388" height="266" class="center"/>You can tell Belzberg interned with Frank Gehry, can&#8217;t you? For more window-licking images of Belzberg&#8217;s interiors and exteriors of this eye-opening LA pad, follow the link. [<a href="http://www.thecoolhunter.net/architecture/A-Home-With-The-Coolest-Outdoor-Home-Theatre/">Coolhunter</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/is_this_the_ultimate_outdoor_home_theater_answer_yes-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon Says F-U To Hollywood Piracy Snitching</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/verizon_says_fu_to_hollywood_piracy_snitching-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/verizon_says_fu_to_hollywood_piracy_snitching-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/verizon_says_fu_to_hollywood_piracy_snitching-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood wants ISPs such as Verizon to help filter and block the illegal transfer of copyrighted content. Unlike AT&#038;T, Verizon is telling Hollywood to kiss its ass. Verizon EVP of Public Affairs Tom Tauke says they won&#8217;t consider Hollywood&#8217;s call to action for three reasons. 


First, it opens the door for other organisations to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/asmallish_VerizonLogo.jpeg" />Hollywood wants ISPs such as Verizon to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/boingboing_gadgets_vs_att-3.html">help filter and block</a> the illegal transfer of copyrighted content. Unlike AT&#038;T, Verizon is telling Hollywood to kiss its ass. Verizon EVP of Public Affairs Tom Tauke says they won&#8217;t consider Hollywood&#8217;s call to action for three reasons. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: content filtering, hollywood, internet, isp, mpaa, verizon --><br />
<span id="more-276422"></span>
<p>First, it opens the door for other organisations to make demands as to what should and shouldn&#8217;t be allowed. Verizon doesn&#8217;t feel the internet should be excessively policed. Second, it sets a precedent that would make networks and service providers liable for future cases where they fail to block content. Third, Verizon sees content filtering as an invasion of privacy, and they try to balance the wishes of customers with the necessity for content protection. Amen. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/verizon-rejects-hollywoods-call-to-aid-piracy-fight/index.html?ex=1202878800&#038;en=44a3ebd65e7036df&#038;ei=5115&#038;partner=VERIZON">NY Times</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/verizon_says_fu_to_hollywood_piracy_snitching-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
