<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; hdmi-cec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/hdmi-cec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Giz Explains: An Illustrated Guide to Every Stupid Cable You Need</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_an_illustrated_guide_to_every_stupid_cable_you_need-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_an_illustrated_guide_to_every_stupid_cable_you_need-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi-cec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_an_illustrated_guide_to_every_stupid_cable_you_need-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We put up with too many cables. There are at least four different kinds of USB plugs, two kinds of FireWire and like a million different ways to connect something to TV or monitor. Modern gadget life can be kind of retarded in this way. Why not one kind of cable, or just a couple? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/CablePus.jpg" style="display:block;" />We put up with too many cables. There are at least four different kinds of USB plugs, two kinds of FireWire and like a million different ways to connect something to TV or monitor. Modern gadget life can be kind of retarded in this way. Why not one kind of cable, or just a couple? I don&#8217;t know. But until everyone gets on the same appendage-to-hole scheme, in the meantime, you can use this: an illustrated guide to pretty much every kind of cable you will see in current gadgets and what it&#8217;s used for (unless, you know, Sony springs a new one on us overnight, which is honestly possible).</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: giz explains, cables, connectors, dvi, ethernet, feature, firewire, firewire 400, firewire 800, hdmi, micro usb, mini dvi, mini usb, mini-dvi, plugs, rj11, rj45, top, usb --><br />
<span id="more-299761"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/usb.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>USB Type A</b> Universal Serial Bus, the gold standard. The whole idea behind it is that this one interface will connect everything (except the stuff it doesn&#8217;t), killing off the old guard, like parallel and serial ports. It moves data, and in the case of USB 2.0&#8211;which is pretty much the standard now&#8211;it does it faster, and with some extra specs for power. <b>Clarification</b>: USB 2.0 adds in the <a href="http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs">Battery Charging specification 1.0</a>, which allows for dedicated charging and other power goodness. This particular connector is the type A variety. It plugs everything from your iPod to your digital camera into a computer, or whatever else. If you haven&#8217;t seen this before, what are you reading this on?</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/type_b_usb_male.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>USB Type B</b> The USB Type B plug is basically a USB connector for peripherals&#8211;you&#8217;ve probably seen it jacked into a printer or scanner.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/mini_usb_male.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /> <strong>Mini USB</strong> It&#8217;s a type of USB connector for smaller devices like cameras and phones&#8211;it takes up less real estate than a port for a Type A connection, obviously.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/micro_usb_male.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><strong>Micro USB</strong> Even smaller than the above Mini USB. Since it&#8217;s, like, even smaller, we&#8217;re starting to see it adopted by LG, Motorola and others&mdash;hopefully this is the last time they all switch power adapters on us, till wireless power makes adapters unnecessary.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/firewire400.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /><b>IEEE 1394 (aka FireWire)</b> An alternative to USB, Apple popularised the IEEE 1394 interface as FireWire (Sony called it i.LINK). You&#8217;re probably most familiar with it on a digital camcorder (or an old school iPod), since it&#8217;s really speedy for data transfers. You&#8217;re looking at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:FireWire_cables.jpg">four- and six-pin versions</a> of FireWire 400. The six-pin version delivers power, the four-pin version (originally favoured by Sony) doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/firewire800.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"> <strong>FireWire 800</strong> A revised, faster version of FireWire <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewire">introduced in 2003</a>, it doesn&#8217;t use the same connectors as the original, making it rare for non pros&mdash;and an unnecessary pain the ass.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/rj45.jpg" style="display:block;" /><b>RJ45</b> The kind of plug you&#8217;re used to seeing on the end of a Category 5, Cat5 enhanced or Cat6 (commonly known as Ethernet) cable, which is plugged into your router or computer&#8217;s networking port. Cat5e is an update to Cat5 that supports faster Gigabit Ethernet. Cat6 is the next-gen standard that will handle speeds twice as fast as Cat5e, and has stricter rules about noise and crosstalk. Interestingly, the most <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewire">recently approved IEEE 1394 spec</a> (aka FireWire S800T) uses RJ45 connectors as well.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/esata_male.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /><b>eSATA</b> External Serial ATA is a branch off of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA">Serial ATA interface</a> that connects your hard drive to your computer if it was put together in the last couple of years. As you can guess from the name, the difference is it&#8217;s an external port, but it delivers the same insane data transfer speeds as the hookup to your hard drive. Faster than USB or FireWire, it&#8217;s basically for external hard drives for quicker data transfers. You&#8217;ll be seeing it more as more laptops include a port for it, usually one that can also be used with USB. There&#8217;s even talk of bus-powered eSATA coming in the next year or two.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/hdmi_male.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /><b>HDMI</b> High-Definition Multimedia Interface is another one of those &#8220;it&#8217;ll connect everything except all the stuff it doesn&#8217;t&#8221; deals, but for high-definition audio and video. It basically replaces DVI (see below) plus S-Video and all that other analogue crap. Laptops, desktops and even high-end cameras and other gadgets are getting HDMI. Besides fat bandwidth, another benefit is control: The Consumer Electronics Control (CEC) profile already lets machines send commands to other products over HDMI&mdash;that or something like it could be very useful in the PC space, too.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/dvi_male.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;" /><b>DVI</b> The digital successor to VGA, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Visual_Interface">Digital Visual Interface</a> is a video connection you&#8217;ll most likely see dealing with computers or computer monitors, at least until they&#8217;re all replaced by HDMI. Older HDTVs have DVI ports too. It can have a few different pin arrangements, depending on whether it carries a digital (DVI-D) or analogue (DVI-A) signal or both (DVI-I, for integrated). The analogue deal on some types is to make them easy to adapt for use with a VGA monitor, but it&#8217;s less and less noteworthy. There&#8217;s also a dual-link version that carries more data for high-res displays. These are helpfully <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:DVI_Connector_Types.svg">depicted at Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/mini_dvi_male_and_female.jpg" style="display:block;" /><b>Mini and Micro DVI</b> are dumb, shrunken, Apple-only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini-DVI">versions</a> of DVI. Why dumb? Because they&#8217;re essentially proprietary formats. HDMI will make them obsolete before long.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/dpanddvi_connectors.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>DisplayPort</b> is the newest <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/giz_explains_displayport_set_t.html">video interface on the block</a>, and its plane of existence is basically in the computer-to-monitor realm only. It&#8217;s not even close to mainstream yet, but Dell is backing it, among others, so you might wanna know it. It can carry a whole lot of data, but it&#8217;s got DRM built into the spec, so it&#8217;s a double-edged sword.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s enough cable to strangle most of California, but by all means feel free to add in your own cable trivia down in the comments.<br /> <em><br /> Something you still wanna know? Send any questions about cables, plugs, holes, bird or bees to tips@gizmodo.com, with &#8220;Giz Explains&#8221; in the subject line.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_an_illustrated_guide_to_every_stupid_cable_you_need-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDMI-CEC no threat to universal remote market</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/hdmicec_no_threat_to_universal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/hdmicec_no_threat_to_universal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi-cec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/hdmicec_no_threat_to_universal.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve seen most of the major players roll out their HDMI-CEC support since earlier in the year, and all I can say is that it makes me want a universal remote more than ever. If one company on a closed circuit across their own brand can&#8217;t make these systems as simple, and elegant, a solution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve seen most of the major players roll out their HDMI-CEC support since earlier in the year, and all I can say is that it makes me want a universal remote more than ever. If one company on a closed circuit across their own brand can&#8217;t make these systems as simple, and elegant, a solution as a third-party programmable remote, then HDMI-CEC is never going to be a serious feature on the TV scene.</p>
<p>Cross brand control is one thing. You don&#8217;t expect it, so it is nice that at least basic commands do work (like ON and OFF). But something that has been positioned as a revolution in device control so far feels MORE complicated than having five remotes on the coffee table.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my advice to all you multinational CE corporations who might be listening:</p>
<p><span id="more-251367"></span>If you incorporate HDMI-CEC into your gear, then you should offer a specialised universal remote to your customers. If someone is the kind of customer that is going to use this, then they have bought lots of your gear &#8212; so make this remote free! They love your stuff, they&#8217;ll keep coming back if you look after them. Don&#8217;t fleece your best customers.</p>
<p>The on screen command system for jumping between device controls is what destroys the concept right now. Isn&#8217;t HDMI-CEC about making control easier? I know my way around a remote, and even I got lost during Panasonic&#8217;s Viera Link demo. You press which to get to what to do how? If the remote simply had a system of device buttons that light to tell you which device you are currently talking to, life would be SO MUCH EASIER.</p>
<p>As it stands, I&#8217;ll take a Harmony remote from Logitech any day over a vendor lock-in that right now delivers no appreciable benefit. <span class="byline">-Seamus Byrne</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/hdmicec_no_threat_to_universal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
