<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; hdd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/hdd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Building A NAS? Skip The Performance Drives</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/building-a-nas-skip-the-performance-drives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/building-a-nas-skip-the-performance-drives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago I was considering putting low-powered 5400rpm drives into a NAS. I was worried about performance, but Tom&#8217;s Hardware shows us that drive speed isn&#8217;t the bottleneck, and how slower drives can even beat faster ones.
The main bottleneck in any NAS is the RAID engine. Since many NAS units don&#8217;t include a dedicated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/hdds.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_hdds.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>A while ago I was considering putting low-powered 5400rpm drives into a NAS. I was worried about performance, but Tom&#8217;s Hardware shows us that drive speed isn&#8217;t the bottleneck, and how slower drives can even beat faster ones.<span id="more-365415"></span></p>
<p>The main bottleneck in any NAS is the RAID engine. Since many NAS units don&#8217;t include a dedicated controller, oftentimes the speed of the drive just doesn&#8217;t matter. If you&#8217;re using a blazing-fast hardware RAID card in your own custom-built setup, then drive speed might make a difference. But for most consumer units, the controller is the bottleneck.</p>
<p>With that in mind, you can go with slower 5400rpm drives that reduce power consumption, generate less heat, and will likely cost less up front too. Even if you have a dedicated RAID card that could let a 7200rpm drive do its thing at full speed, I&#8217;d consider the benefits of low-power drives to outweigh the marginal speed increase you might see.</p>
<p>This chart shows the difference between Samsung 7200pm and 5400rpm drives in various RAID configurations:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/HD321KJ_vs_HD103SI_-_Backup.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Not much, right? So think twice before you drop more than necessary on 7200rpm drives for your backup unit. Check out the link for the full test rundown. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/network-attached-storage,2448.html#xtor=RSS-182">Tom's Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/building-a-nas-skip-the-performance-drives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Origin Data Locker Backs Rugged Looks With AES Hardware Encryption</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/origin-data-locker-backs-rugged-looks-with-aes-hardware-encryption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/origin-data-locker-backs-rugged-looks-with-aes-hardware-encryption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datalocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[origin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Origin Data Locker: For the paranoid geek who lives with his parents in their fortified underground bunker.
Doubt it? Everything from the belongs-on-a-battleship looks to the AES encryption software to the 6-18 digit PIN screams &#8220;you will not get the 1TB of porn inside me.&#8221;
Even the touchscreen keypad is paranoid, as it changes randomly each [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/datalocker-540x372.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_datalocker-540x372.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The Origin Data Locker: For the paranoid geek who lives with his parents in their fortified underground bunker.<span id="more-361024"></span></p>
<p>Doubt it? Everything from the belongs-on-a-battleship looks to the AES encryption software to the 6-18 digit PIN screams &#8220;you will not get the 1TB of porn inside me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even the touchscreen keypad is paranoid, as it changes randomly each time you use it so the spies you think are on your tail can&#8217;t memorize the PIN. One touch drive erase means the hentai secrets get scrubbed instantly the moment your parents those spies catch you.</p>
<p>Pricing starts at $US488 for the 750GB version and $US652 for the 1TB. [<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/origin-unveils-1tb-and-750gb-data-locker-external-hdds-1660732/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/origin-data-locker-backs-rugged-looks-with-aes-hardware-encryption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Apple Time Capsules Short Lived?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/are-apple-time-capsules-short-lived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/are-apple-time-capsules-short-lived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time capsule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s Time Capsule allows you to back up all the computers in your house. But what&#8217;s the point of a network backup server that stays alive for only 17 months and 17 days?
That&#8217;s the average life span of the 125&#8212;and counting&#8212;dead Apple Time Capsules at The Apple Time Capsule Memorial Register. And all the users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/dead-time-capsules.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_dead-time-capsules.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/time_capsule_initial_verdict_smooth_sailing_no_surprises-2/">Time Capsule</a> allows you to back up all the computers in your house. But what&#8217;s the point of a network backup server that stays alive for only 17 months and 17 days?<span id="more-359806"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the average life span of the 125&mdash;and counting&mdash;dead Apple Time Capsules at The Apple Time Capsule Memorial Register. And all the users who registered those dead pieces of plastic and metal are saying that&#8217;s not enough. I agree that the figure seems too low. But then again, like Matt Buchanan just said when he heard about it: &#8220;They&#8217;re all using shitty Hitachi hard drives that aren&#8217;t actually server grade, so colour me less than surprised.&#8221;</p>
<p>I say they all have a point. [<a href="http://timecapsuledead.org/">Time Capsule Memorial</a> via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/10/11/dead-time-capsules-can-hang-out-together/">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/are-apple-time-capsules-short-lived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Test: Seagate&#8217;s 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/quick-test-seagates-1tb-portable-freeagent-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/quick-test-seagates-1tb-portable-freeagent-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1tb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeagent go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=359574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The season of the 1TB bus-powered USB drive is upon us. WD was first; now Seagate is shipping the FreeAgent Go, a chunky SOB &#8212; three platters worth of storage powered and connected by one skinny cable.
The good news is that these things work well, despite the larger drive and lower power. They&#8217;re not about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Seagate_1TB_USB_drive_top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Seagate_1TB_USB_drive_top.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The season of the 1TB bus-powered USB drive is upon us. <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/company/releases/PressRelease.asp?release=1339ccf4-bfd1-4163-8903-f2b0abddb738">WD was first</a>; now Seagate is shipping the FreeAgent Go, a chunky SOB &mdash; three platters worth of storage powered and connected by one skinny cable.<span id="more-359574"></span></p>
<p>The good news is that these things work well, despite the larger drive and lower power. They&#8217;re not about performance &mdash; 5400 rpm only &mdash; but when I tested moving a 1GB file to and from, I got it in under 30 seconds, just a hair slower than the same file moved to and from faster FireWire 800 drives. I didn&#8217;t do any <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/computer-benchmarking-why-its-important-to-get-it-right/">real benchmarking</a>, but I am convinced that the USB is going to be the bottleneck, not the bigger drive (shown below with a 320GB USB-only and a 500GB FW800/USB combo). The FreeAgent was even designed to fit the USB dock and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/seagate-freeagent-theater-review-it-actually-works/">FreeAgent Theater+</a>, though not subtly.</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/IMG_3405.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_IMG_3405.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/IMG_3402.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_IMG_3402.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/IMG_3394.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_IMG_3394.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/IMG_3408.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_IMG_3408.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>That brings us to the bad news, which many of you already know: Despite being portable bus-powered 2.5-inch drives, the three-platter HDDs inside these casings are not capable of being ripped out and stuck into your laptop, at least, not without some hackery I am not qualified to endorse. So, in lieu of a full review, I offer this: It works, it&#8217;s not noticeably sluggish given the added weight, and it feels really good to be able to carry a whole terabyte wherever I want. [<a href="http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/external/freeagent/freeagent_go/">Seagate</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/quick-test-seagates-1tb-portable-freeagent-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffalo&#8217;s HD-HU3 Poised To Be The First USB 3.0 Hard Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/buffalos-hd-hu3-poised-to-be-the-first-usb-3-0-hard-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/buffalos-hd-hu3-poised-to-be-the-first-usb-3-0-hard-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd-hu3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buffalo is set to cross the USB 3.0 finish line first with their HD-HU3 hard drive. They also plan on offering NEC&#8217;s IFC-PCIE2U3 2-port PCI Expressx1 host controller with the drive so you can, you know, use it.
The drives will be available this month &#8212; although it appears to be a Japan-only release for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/buffalo_hd-hu3.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Buffalo is set to cross the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/usb-30">USB 3.0</a> finish line first with their HD-HU3 hard drive. They also plan on offering NEC&#8217;s IFC-PCIE2U3 2-port PCI Expressx1 host controller with the drive so you can, you know, use it.<span id="more-358788"></span></p>
<p>The drives will be available this month &mdash; although it appears to be a Japan-only release for the moment. The drives will run around $US250 and $US284 for 1TB and 1.5TB models respectively (a 2TB model is also in the works), and the controller will run an additional $US60. It&#8217;s probably a bit early to jump on 3.0, but chances are we <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/usb-30-equipped-pcs-to-start-shipping-by-end-of-2009/">won&#8217;t have to wait long</a> before the technology goes mainstream. [<a href="http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;langpair=ja|en&amp;u=http://buffalo.jp/products/catalog/storage/hd-hu3/&amp;rurl=translate.google.com&amp;usg=ALkJrhiohtDTbyDhq62PXJOh88XYndv-vA">Buffalo Japan</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/buffalo-ships-worlds-first-usb-3-0-hard-disk-drives-this-month/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/buffalos-hd-hu3-poised-to-be-the-first-usb-3-0-hard-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Silver Surfer Probably Uses LaCie Starck Drives</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-silver-surfer-probably-uses-lacie-starck-drives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-silver-surfer-probably-uses-lacie-starck-drives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacie starck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the new LaCie Starck drives. I look at that all that melty chrome and all I want is to dunk a toast in it and eat. It&#8217;s hard to find a storage that you actually want to lick.

You can get the LaCie Starck Desktop Hard Drive in 1TB and 2TB flavors, while the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Starck_Stacked.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Starck_Stacked.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I like the new LaCie Starck drives. I look at that all that melty chrome and all I want is to dunk a toast in it and <em>eat</em>. It&#8217;s hard to find a storage that you actually want to lick.<span id="more-358518"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Starck-Desktop_side_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_Starck-Desktop_side_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Starck-Desktop_Back_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_Starck-Desktop_Back_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/Starck-Desktop_PKG_photo_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_Starck-Desktop_PKG_photo_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Starck-Mobile_3-4_Front_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/gallery_Starck-Mobile_3-4_Front_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<p>You can get the LaCie Starck Desktop Hard Drive in 1TB and 2TB flavors, while the LaCie Starck Mobile Drive in 320GB and 500GB. The prices should be around $US130 for the Desktop and $US100 for the Mobile.</p>
<p>In the words of Philippe Starck:</p>
<blockquote><p> Technological genius explodes exponentially, each time with incredible power whose limits are yet to be known. The power remains, never abating, symbolically characterized by the sculptural magma that one attempts to cleave, to master within this geometrically perfect strongbox. A symbol of strength mastered, of freedom guided, of incandescent magma heeding to the form of its cast. The interpretation is free. But the mystery remains.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> See? He wants to dunk a toast in his drives too. [<a href="http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?pid=11374">LaCie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-silver-surfer-probably-uses-lacie-starck-drives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WD Puts E-Labels On My Book Elite/Studio, Passport Elite Gets Dock</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/wd-puts-e-labels-on-my-book-elite-and-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/wd-puts-e-labels-on-my-book-elite-and-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my book elite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my book studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport elite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard drives have become so generic and commoditised, manufacturers are always trying to draw attention to their products in new ways. WD&#8217;s My Book desktop drives now get an ebook-like screen, while the portable My Passport Elite gets a dock.
As cool as the e-labels concept is&#8212;soon to be found on My Book Elite (USB only, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/New_WD_Drives.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_New_WD_Drives.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Hard drives have become so generic and commoditised, manufacturers are always trying to draw attention to their products in new ways. WD&#8217;s My Book desktop drives now get an ebook-like screen, while the portable My Passport Elite gets a dock.<span id="more-358508"></span></p>
<p>As cool as the e-labels concept is&mdash;soon to be found on My Book Elite (USB only, up to 2TB for $US280) and My Book Studio (FW800 and USB, up to 2TB for $US300)&mdash;I don&#8217;t know how profound a single 12-character label on the face of such a massive drive can be. Then again, maybe you&#8217;re supposed to buy them in identical pairs. The label, which, like the E-Ink found on Amazon&#8217;s Kindle, stays visible when there&#8217;s no power going to it, could in that case save you from embarrassment, possibly even job loss/misdemeanor charges/etc. Below the label is a status indicator &mdash; how many GB are left, plus a rough visual estimate.</p>
<p>The My Passport Elite line gets a visual refresh that first appeared in the less feature-bestowed Passport Essential. Slimmer and more rounded at the edges, the Elite line gets a metallic red, blue or charcoal finish and a dock &mdash; top price is $US170 for a 640GB 2.5-inch USB 2.0 bus-powered drive. The dock thing makes sense in one particular situation: You have a laptop and a desktop that you regularly shuttle between. The Elites will show capacity status on an LED indicator, and will indicate encryption with a light-up key icon on the side, so you <em>feel</em> extra safe. Speaking of safe, all of the hard drives also come with 256-bit hardware encryption. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/index.asp?cat=5">WD</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/wd-puts-e-labels-on-my-book-elite-and-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Modder Desecrates Fond Nintendo Memory From My Youth</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/yet-another-modder-desecrates-fond-nintendo-memory-from-my-youth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/yet-another-modder-desecrates-fond-nintendo-memory-from-my-youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super mario bros. 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=356838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like I&#8217;ve said here before, when a modder takes a perfectly perfect piece of Nintendo lore and makes a hard drive out of it, or turns a classic item from gaming history and begets a USB drive, I weep.
The victim today is Super Mario Bros. 3, arguably the best platformer title in history and possibly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/il_fullxfull.87527926.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_il_fullxfull.87527926.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Like I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/gutted-classic-game-boy-made-into-80gb-hard-drive/">said here before</a>, when a modder takes a perfectly perfect piece of Nintendo lore and makes a hard drive out of it, or turns a classic item from gaming history and begets a USB drive, I weep.<span id="more-356838"></span></p>
<p>The victim today is <em>Super Mario Bros. 3</em>, arguably the best platformer title in history and possibly one of the best video games ever created by mankind.</p>
<p>As of this writing, there is one less of these fine cartridges left in the world. The one you see here has had its guts ripped asunder, only to be replaced with a 160GB USB hard drive.</p>
<p>Sure, one could put thousands of Super Mario Bros. 3 ROMs inside this thing now that it contains a hard drive, but the essence&mdash;and a bit of my childhood&mdash;are gone forever. I&#8217;ll be sleeping with my copy under the pillow tonight. [<a href="http://www.geeksugar.com/5040111">GeekSugar</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/09/26/super-mario-bros-3-usb-hdd-awesome-or-waste-of-a-perfectly-good-nes-cartridge/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/yet-another-modder-desecrates-fond-nintendo-memory-from-my-youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NETGEAR Pimps Stora NAS With Easy Web Sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/netgear-pimps-stora-nas-with-easy-web-sharing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/netgear-pimps-stora-nas-with-easy-web-sharing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Oaten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NETGEAR, purveryors of quality Network Attached Storage devices, has announced NETGEAR Stora for the Australian market. Setting it apart from other NAS products is it has been designed to not only make home media sharing a snap but to send your fun stuff over the web, too. But you&#8217;ll have to wait a few weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/ms2110-copy-410x400.jpg" alt="ms2110 copy" title="ms2110 copy" width="410" height="400" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-355489" /><a href="http://www.netgear.com.au/">NETGEAR</a>, purveryors of quality Network Attached Storage devices, has announced NETGEAR Stora for the Australian market. Setting it apart from other NAS products is it has been designed to not only make home media sharing a snap but to send your fun stuff over the web, too. But you&#8217;ll have to wait a few weeks to get your paws on it.<span id="more-355482"></span></p>
<p>Stora lets consumers easily share their photos and videos with friends without having to upload to internet sites or transfer them by email. By serving via www.MyStora.com, users and their designated friends and relatives can remotely access their media files from any internet-connected device, such as laptops, PCs and smartphones. That&#8217;s the good news. The bad news is you&#8217;ll have to wait until late October to get your hands on it from selected Australian retail and e-commerce stores. Perhaps it would be worth putting off a NAS device purchase until this baby lands.</p>
<p>“With the amount of music, movies and photos we increasingly download, storage is quickly becoming a necessity and the Stora really is a device that everyone can use. It sports an incredibly user-friendly interface, is compatible with any platform, affordable and comes with one terabyte of storage. You can share any of your files remotely with family and friends, such as photo albums of your latest holiday, by simply sending a link which can even be accessed on a mobile smartphone so no need to force anyone to join Facebook. It’s changing the face of storage in the home,” said Ryan Parker, managing director, NETGEAR Australia and New Zealand.</p>
<p>NETGEAR’s Stora is compatible with Mac, PC and Linux systems, according to the maker.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s got DLNA, too</strong><br />
Stora is also DLNA-certified, so it can serve content to other networked devices that are Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA)-enabled. This includes photo frames, XBox 360 and PlayStation 3 game consoles, as well as iPhone and Blackberry mobile phones. Don&#8217;t know about DLNA? Learn more <a href="http://www.dlna.org/home">here</a>. </p>
<p>Turning to the tech specs, we see the Stora (MS2110) comes with a 1TB disk and one extra drive bay that can be used to insert an optional disk for mirroring. NETGEAR provides a three-year warranty and 24/7 technical support. The Stora carries a $399 price tag.</p>
<p>An optional yearly premium service, to support additional remote access and third-party service integration such as Flickr and mobile phones, will be available for about $20 after an initial 30-day trial period.</p>
<p>For more info, head on over to the <a href="http://www.netgear.com/stora">NETGEAR</a> site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/netgear-pimps-stora-nas-with-easy-web-sharing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSATA: It&#8217;s Like SATA But Smaller</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/msata-its-like-sata-but-smaller/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/msata-its-like-sata-but-smaller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata-io]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve heard of SATA. It&#8217;s the technology used for the majority of today&#8217;s hard drives and people generally like it. But SATA wasn&#8217;t designed for tiny portables. That&#8217;s why the guys behind SATA are introducing mini-SATA or mSATA for short.
Supporting 1.5Gbps and 3.0Gbps transfer rates (peaking at half the speed of existing SATA), mSATA is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/msata.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_msata.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>You&#8217;ve heard of SATA. It&#8217;s the technology used for the majority of today&#8217;s hard drives and people generally like it. But SATA wasn&#8217;t designed for tiny portables. That&#8217;s why the guys behind SATA are introducing mini-SATA or mSATA for short.<span id="more-355055"></span></p>
<p>Supporting 1.5Gbps and 3.0Gbps transfer rates (peaking at half the speed of existing SATA), mSATA is intended for drives that are roughly the size of a business card.</p>
<p>Check out that lead shot. On the left, you see a small Toshiba drive using a traditional SATA connector. On the right, you see a Toshiba drive using the mSATA standard. (Incidentally, Toshiba will be offering that flash drive in 30 and 62GB sizes with 180MB/s read speeds and 50MB/s writes.) The end products aren&#8217;t really so different in terms of size, but the mSATA connection itself is, what, half the footprint of SATA?</p>
<p>Sounds good to us. [<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090921005517&amp;newsLang=en">mSATA</a> and <a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/09-21-2009/0005097642&amp;EDATE=">Toshiba</a> via <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090921005517&amp;newsLang=en">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/msata-its-like-sata-but-smaller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
