<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LaCie LaCinema Classic HD: 1TB Media Player For $299</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/lacie-lacinema-classic-hd-1tb-media-player-for-299/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/lacie-lacinema-classic-hd-1tb-media-player-for-299/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dlna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacie lacinema classic hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacinema classic hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media centres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media players]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=369026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LaCie makes design-friendly, premium hard drives. But while it&#8217;s no surprise that their LaCinema Classic HD looks this attractive, the $299 price is surprisingly reasonable.
The LaCie LaCinema Classic HD is, at its heart, a 1TB hard drive with HDMI-out. You can load up media through USB from a PC or Mac (or flash drive). Then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lacinemaclassic_3-qtr_left_remote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lacinemaclassic_3-qtr_left_remote.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>LaCie makes design-friendly, premium hard drives. But while it&#8217;s no surprise that their LaCinema Classic HD looks this attractive, the $299 price is surprisingly reasonable.<span id="more-369026"></span></p>
<p>The LaCie LaCinema Classic HD is, at its heart, a 1TB hard drive with HDMI-out. You can load up media through USB from a PC or Mac (or flash drive). Then you can carry the drive to your television and watch DivX or MKV H.264 movies.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s always a DLNA-compliant HD media player. In other words, you can hook it in to your network through Ethernet (Wi-Fi dongle available) and stream media without copying the files over.</p>
<p>Time will tell if LaCie&#8217;s player can compete with the rest of the competition (<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/hd-media-player-battlemodo-apple-tv-killers/">see our full Battlemodo here</a>), but it&#8217;s available now in Australia for $299, and it&#8217;s certainly the best-looking media streamer we&#8217;ve seen to date. </p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lacinemaclassic-front.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lacinemaclassic_profile.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lacinemaclassichd-back.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lacinemaclassichd_box.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.lacie.com/au/products/product.htm?pid=11389">LaCie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/lacie-lacinema-classic-hd-1tb-media-player-for-299/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffalo&#8217;s USB 3.0 External Hard Drive Arrives In The US</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/buffalos-usb-3-0-external-hard-drive-arrives-in-the-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/buffalos-usb-3-0-external-hard-drive-arrives-in-the-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo drivestation hd-hxu3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd-hxu3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=369009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, the DriveStation HD-HXU3 is the first external USB 3.0 drive in the US. It promises transfers up to 4.8Gbps (compared to USB 2.0&#8217;s 480Mbps) and Buffalo has a two-port USB 3.0 PCI Express card to get you started.
There&#8217;s no price yet on the USB 3.0 PCI Express card (IFC-PCIE2U3), but it&#8217;s expected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/buffalo_hd-hu3.jpg" alt="" class="right" />As <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/buffalos-hd-hu3-poised-to-be-the-first-usb-3-0-hard-drive/">expected</a>, the DriveStation HD-HXU3 is the first external USB 3.0 drive in the US. It promises transfers up to 4.8Gbps (compared to USB 2.0&#8217;s 480Mbps) and Buffalo has a two-port USB 3.0 PCI Express card to get you started.<span id="more-369009"></span></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no price yet on the USB 3.0 PCI Express card (IFC-PCIE2U3), but it&#8217;s expected to be about $US60. The drive itself will be $US200 (1TB), $US250 (1.5TB) and $US400 (2TB), and ships with Memeo AutoBackup software for the Mac or PC. [<a href="http://www.buffalotech.com/products/external-storage/drivestation/drivestation-usb-30-hd-hxu3/">Buffalo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/buffalos-usb-3-0-external-hard-drive-arrives-in-the-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telstra&#8217;s New Wireless Gateway: You Really Pay For What You Get</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/telstras-new-wireless-gateway-you-really-pay-for-what-you-get/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/telstras-new-wireless-gateway-you-really-pay-for-what-you-get/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elly Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gateways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telstra’s launched a new home internet gateway that delivers high-speed broadband over the Next G wireless network, which means no cables and no fixed lines. But how much are you willing to pay for Australia’s fastest, wireless, broadband connection?
Designed and built by NetComm, the BigPond Elite Wireless Broadband Network Gateway is essentially a 3G modem/router [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/BigPond-Elite™-Network-Gateway-CMYK_V1.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Telstra’s launched a new home internet gateway that delivers high-speed broadband over the Next G wireless network, which means no cables and no fixed lines. But how much are you willing to pay for Australia’s fastest, wireless, broadband connection?<span id="more-368975"></span></p>
<p>Designed and built by NetComm, the BigPond Elite Wireless Broadband Network Gateway is essentially a 3G modem/router with the same HSPA+ technology used in its mobile broadband sticks. Telstra is touting typical download speeds of up to 8Mbps, although speed tests on servers in Canberra reached 11Mbps.</p>
<p>The device is well suited to people who don’t have a landline, people who don’t have access to ADSL/cable, or people who move frequently, such as travellers or renters. The ideal situation &#8211; at least for Telstra &#8211; would be to turn the whole house into a Wi-Fi hotspot, thereby feeding the addictions of power-hungry families. There are four Ethernet ports and two USB ports, so you can plug in printers, external hard drives, etc. But that’s not ideal if you want to use the BigPond Elite as a mobile broadband device.</p>
<p>Executive Director Telstra Consumer, Jenny Young: “The Gateway also helps keep families entertained on holidays and while on the move. All that’s required is power and Next G network coverage and parents can quickly and easily access all their online must-haves, from instant messaging and email to YouTube.”</p>
<p>The BigPond Elite is compatible with Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7 and Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5. Snow Leopard users, however, have to wait for a patch which is expected to roll out on December 1.</p>
<p>It’s <a href="http://www.beeneverywhere.com.au/html/latest_offer.htm">available now</a> for $399, and if you sign a 24-month contract, you’re eligible for a $200 rebate and 50 per cent off for the first 12 months. In fact, you have no choice. There is no prepaid option. </p>
<p>Is it worth it to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/telstras-new-wireless-gateway-you-really-pay-for-what-you-get/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Sued For Killing Off Third Party Xbox 360 Memory Units</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-sued-for-killing-off-third-party-xbox-360-memory-units/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-sued-for-killing-off-third-party-xbox-360-memory-units/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Datel, a company selling memory units for Xbox 360 consoles, filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft for blocking unauthorised third party memory units. Microsoft claims innocence, as the block is meant to reduce cheating on Xbox Live, not reduce competition.
Datel maintains that Microsoft is &#8220;disabling or erecting technological barriers to Datel accessories&#8221; and thereby favouring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/xboxmemory.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Datel, a company selling memory units for Xbox 360 consoles, filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft for blocking unauthorised third party memory units. Microsoft claims innocence, as the block is meant to reduce cheating on Xbox Live, not reduce competition.<span id="more-368874"></span></p>
<p>Datel maintains that Microsoft is &#8220;disabling or erecting technological barriers to Datel accessories&#8221; and thereby favouring its own products. For reference, Microsoft&#8217;s 512MB memory unit is about $US30, while a 2GB version from Datel is $US40. Sounds like it might be worth supporting the little guy in this one. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/datel_sues_microsoft_over_xbox_360_memory_unit_crackdown.html">Techflash</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-sued-for-killing-off-third-party-xbox-360-memory-units/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Core i9 Benched: Six Cores Of Pure Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-core-i9-benched-six-cores-of-pure-joy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-core-i9-benched-six-cores-of-pure-joy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel core i9]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On paper, the Core i9 might not sound that exciting: It&#8217;s a lot like the Core i7, except built with a 32nm fabrication process and two extra cores, for a total of six. Early benchmarks, though, say it flies. Sometimes.
The i9 doesn&#8217;t extract significant advantages from its pumped core count (which brings processing thread count [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_intelcorei9-leaklg.jpg" alt="" class="center" />On paper, the Core i9 might not sound that exciting: It&#8217;s a lot like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/intel-core-i7">Core i7</a>, except built with a 32nm fabrication process and two extra cores, for a total of six. <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/146477==http://pclab.pl/art39718.html">Early benchmarks</a>, though, say it <em>flies</em>. Sometimes.<span id="more-368795"></span></p>
<p>The i9 doesn&#8217;t extract significant advantages from its pumped core count (which brings processing thread count up to 12) in a lot of day-to-day tasks, so don&#8217;t expect to see an increase in game performance, Windows startup speed or other single-core optimised tasks. It&#8217;s when you start rendering video or doing 3D modelling &#8211; tasks that are suited to parallelisation &#8211; that the i9 flexes its muscles.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/x264_p2.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_x264_p2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>That&#8217;s roughly a 50 per cent increase in video-encoding performance over a similarly clocked i7 &#8211; already no slouch by any existing standards.</p>
<p>The i9 processors won&#8217;t ship until sometime in early to mid 2010, and when they do, expect them to be a bit on the expensive side. But man, <em>50 per cent</em>. I think I can stand to save up a few more bucks, honestly. [<a href="http://macnn.com/rd/146477==http://pclab.pl/art39718.html">PCLab</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/23/core.i9s.six.cores.an.edge.in.key.apps/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/intel-core-i9-benched-six-cores-of-pure-joy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCZ Colossus 3.5-Inch SSD Reaches 1TB, Super Speeds</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ocz-colossus-3-5-inch-ssd-reaches-1tb-super-speeds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ocz-colossus-3-5-inch-ssd-reaches-1tb-super-speeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colossus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocz colossus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OCZ&#8217;s new Colossus drives are among the first SSDs designed for desktops, and they&#8217;re the very first to store up to 1TB of data. Oh, and on top of all that, they work pretty well, too.
PC Perspective tested one of OCZ&#8217;s 256GB Colossus drives and found &#8220;read and write speeds are about as fast as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_oczcol.jpg" alt="" class="center" />OCZ&#8217;s new Colossus drives are among the first SSDs designed for desktops, and they&#8217;re the very first to store up to 1TB of data. Oh, and on top of all that, they work pretty well, too.<span id="more-368747"></span></p>
<p>PC Perspective tested one of OCZ&#8217;s 256GB Colossus drives and found &#8220;read and write speeds are about as fast as SATA 3Gb/sec will go!&#8221; It&#8217;s nuts that our drives are finally catching up with the plentiful, SATA pipelines, even if OCZ has hacked speeds a bit by essentially building one giant drive out of four smaller SSDs.</p>
<p>Whatever works. Now to sell a spare kidney for the $US3300, 1TB configuration. Read the full testing results at: [<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=821&#038;type=expert&#038;pid=11">PC Perspective</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/ocz-colossus-3-5-inch-ssd-reaches-1tb-super-speeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cell Processor Is Going Extinct</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM&#8217;s shit-canning the Cell processor line &#8211; you know, the chip that&#8217;s in the PS3 and uh, Toshiba laptops and TVs &#8211; according to their VP of Deep Computing, making the current PowerXCell 8i the last of its ilk. 
[Fudzilla via MaxConsole]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/celllll.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_celllll.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>IBM&#8217;s shit-canning the Cell processor line &#8211; you know, the chip that&#8217;s in the PS3 and uh, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/toshiba_qosmio_g55_is_first_laptop_with_cell_processor_aboard-2/">Toshiba laptops</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-cell-regza-ps3-tv-sorts-shows-by-similarity/">TVs</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16530/38/">according to their VP of Deep Computing</a>, making the current PowerXCell 8i the last of its ilk. <span id="more-368738"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16530/38/">Fudzilla</a> via <a href="http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&#038;newsid=37958">MaxConsole</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drobo S: A Faster, Fatter Storage Robot With ESATA</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/drobo-s-a-faster-fatter-storage-robot-with-esata/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/drobo-s-a-faster-fatter-storage-robot-with-esata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drobo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drobo s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network attached storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s the &#8216;S&#8217; stand for in Drobo S? Speed. Uh, more speed. And more storage. Specifically, a fifth drive bay for more redundancy, faster FireWire and a new eSATA port. As always, it&#8217;s not cheap &#8212; $US800 sans drives. 
[Drobo]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drobos.jpg" alt="" class="center" />What&#8217;s the &#8216;S&#8217; stand for in Drobo S? Speed. Uh, more speed. And more storage. Specifically, a fifth drive bay for more redundancy, faster FireWire and a new eSATA port. As always, it&#8217;s not cheap &mdash; $US800 sans drives. <span id="more-368736"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.drobo.com/products/drobo-s.php">Drobo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/drobo-s-a-faster-fatter-storage-robot-with-esata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Denying Support to Smokers?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/apple-denying-support-to-smokers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/apple-denying-support-to-smokers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applecare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Consumerist is reporting that two Mac users were denied AppleCare coverage because the owners were smokers. Not because the computers were damaged by second-hand smoke, but because of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations.
According to separate reports from different parts of the country, Apple denied coverage for two users in 2008 based on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_apple_smokers.jpg" alt="" class="center" />The Consumerist is reporting that two Mac users were denied AppleCare coverage because the owners were smokers. Not because the computers were damaged by second-hand smoke, but because of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations.<span id="more-368591"></span></p>
<p>According to separate reports from different parts of the country, Apple denied coverage for two users in 2008 based on the fact that OSHA lists cigarette smoke as a biohazard. Both techs refused service to the computers not because the smoke damaged them, but because it&#8217;s considered hazardous to a tech&#8217;s health to work on a contaminated unit.</p>
<p>Both owners tried to appeal their cases, even going all the way up to Steve Jobs. Unlike <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/steve-jobs-responds-to-passionate-app-developer-curtly/">this guy</a>, they weren&#8217;t as lucky.</p>
<p>These are just two isolated incidents though, and in the comments at Consumerist some smokers are reporting having no trouble getting their computers serviced by Apple. It appears to be on a case-by-case basis, not a hard-set policy. Any smokers out there ever run into trouble getting Apple to repair hardware? [<a href="http://consumerist.com/5408885/smoking-near-apple-computers-creates-biohazard-voids-warranty">Consumerist</a> via <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/11/21/147253/Apple-Voiding-Smokers-Warranties ">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/apple-denying-support-to-smokers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atom Processor To Get The 32nm Treatment In 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atom-processor-to-get-the-32nm-treatment-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atom-processor-to-get-the-32nm-treatment-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedar trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedarview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention, people who like to maintain a complete mental taxonomy of every processor: Cedar Trail has been outed as the new Atom platform for 2011, with the name Cedarview going to the processor itself. Along with 32nm fabrication, some goodies:
According to Fudzilla, the platform will include a new memory controller to accommodate DDR3 RAM which, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_intel-atom.jpg" alt="" class="right" />Attention, people who like to maintain a complete mental taxonomy of every processor: Cedar Trail has been outed as the new Atom platform for 2011, with the name Cedarview going to the processor itself. Along with 32nm fabrication, some goodies:<span id="more-368389"></span></p>
<p>According to Fudzilla, the platform will include a new memory controller to accommodate DDR3 RAM which, despite supporting two slots, will remain single-channel. Pineview, the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-select-intel-atom-cpu-netbooks-to-be-allowed-2gb-ram/">next Atom</a> before Cedarview, hasn&#8217;t even shipped yet &mdash; that&#8217;s expected to be the beginning of next year &mdash; so it&#8217;s interesting to glimpse this far into the future, where Atom, such as it is, will remain positioned almost <em>exactly</em> where it is now. Oh well! [<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16512/41/">Fudzilla</a>]</p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: That Atom sitting on the penny up there is an older version (not that the new one will look any different).</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/atom-processor-to-get-the-32nm-treatment-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
