<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/finance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:09:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Even More Head-Scratching Apple Analysis From CNBC</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/even-more-head-scratching-apple-analysis-from-cnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/even-more-head-scratching-apple-analysis-from-cnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inaccuracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Additional Apple-related shenanigans from CNBC as they report on Apple stock &#8220;tanking&#8221; in January following Steve Jobs&#8217; poor health:
 Apple&#8217;s stock had tanked in January, falling as low as $US78.20, when Jobs said he had a hormone imbalance and the company announced that its founder would be taking a six-month medical leave. It has since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/stockshan.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Additional Apple-related <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/cnbc_is_ridiculous_macs_come_with_photoshop_pcs_need_600_extra_to_perform_as_well_as_a_mac-2/">shenanigans from CNBC</a> as they report on Apple stock &#8220;tanking&#8221; in January following Steve Jobs&#8217; poor health:<span id="more-338863"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Apple&#8217;s stock had tanked in January, falling as low as $US78.20, when Jobs said he had a hormone imbalance and the company announced that its founder would be taking a six-month medical leave. It has since made a choppy comeback as concerns about his health persist.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Thing is, as John Gruber accurately notes with a simple Google Finance chart, that isn&#8217;t entirely true.</p>
<p>To say this kind of odd Apple reporting from CNBC is &#8220;something new&#8221; would also be, of course, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?s=cnbc">not entirely true.</a> [<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31456167">CNBC</a> via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/06/21/cnbc-jobs">Daring Fireball</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/06/21/tanked.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/even-more-head-scratching-apple-analysis-from-cnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monster Cable Lowering Prices During Recession, Uh&#8230;Thanks?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/monster_cable_lowering_prices_during_recession_uhthanks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/monster_cable_lowering_prices_during_recession_uhthanks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financiapocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recessions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/monster_cable_lowering_prices_during_recession_uhthanks-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Monster Cable, purveyors of grossly overpriced products, feel your pain during these tough financial times. That&#8217;s why they are reducing their ridiculous prices to slightly less ridiculous prices during the recession.



Now, founder and &#8220;Head Monster&#8221; Noel Lee is cutting prices on top-of-the-line cables for high-definition TVs, effective in June. An 8-foot HDMI cable that currently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/monster-cable-hdmi_01.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Monster Cable, purveyors of grossly overpriced products, feel your pain during these tough financial times. That&#8217;s why they are reducing their ridiculous prices to slightly less ridiculous prices during the recession.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: monster cable, cable, cabling, hdmi, home entertainment, home theater, monster, monster cable lowering prices, price reduction, recession, retail --><br />
<span id="more-335137"></span><br />
<blockquote>
<p>Now, founder and &#8220;Head Monster&#8221; Noel Lee is cutting prices on top-of-the-line cables for high-definition TVs, effective in June. An 8-foot HDMI cable that currently sells for $US129.95 at Best Buy will be priced at $US99.</p>
<p>On Monday, the company also lopped $US10 off the price of its most basic&mdash;but rarely stocked&mdash;HDMI TV cable, to $US29 for a 1-metre length. And it introduced two new lower-cost HDMI cables in 2-metre and 4-metre lengths for $US39.95 and $US59.95. Competitors&#8217; cables of similar length can be found online for as low as $US5.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This just makes me laugh. As we pointed out in our &#8220;Truth About Monster Cable&#8221; series, buying high end cable is usually unnecessary. But hey, if people want to waste money on &#8220;the best&#8221; I can hardly blame Monster for selling it to them. As Noel Lee pointed out to USA Today: &#8220;It&#8217;s ironic, when people buy Monster, they don&#8217;t expect to pay (a) low price, so our lower-end cables don&#8217;t sell very well.&#8221; That&#8217;s probably true&mdash;the people who buy these things might view the price as an exclusive barrier to entry, and therefore part of the allure. It will be interesting to see if this price tactic actually improves sales. [<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-04-27-monster-cable-price-cuts_N.htm">USA Today</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/monster_cable_lowering_prices_during_recession_uhthanks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-22 Raptor May Be Replaced By&#8230;Sniper Blimps?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_f22_raptor_may_be_replaced_bysniper_blimps-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_f22_raptor_may_be_replaced_bysniper_blimps-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_f22_raptor_may_be_replaced_bysniper_blimps-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally designed to fight the Soviets in WWIII, the F-22 Raptor has never seen combat. And now, Barack Obama needs to decide whether to keep building them or kill the plane forever.


Each F-22 costs $US143 million, and at stake is a $US9 billion proposal to build 60 more Raptors over the next three years. Defence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/f22_lockheed.jpg" style="display:block;" />Originally designed to fight the Soviets in WWIII, the F-22 Raptor has never seen combat. And now, Barack Obama needs to decide whether to keep building them or kill the plane forever.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: military, airplanes, f-22, f-22 raptor, fighter jets, financiapocalypse, jets, raptor --><br />
<span id="more-318530"></span>
<p>Each F-22 costs $US143 million, and at stake is a $US9 billion proposal to build 60 more Raptors over the next three years. Defence Secretary Robert Gates is fine with axing the program (as was the Bush administration, who has of course deferred the decision), favouring instead the development of unmanned UAVs that are more adept at the reconnaissance and surgical strikes used in fighting terrorists, not the air-to-air dogfights that would have been expected when facing up to a Soviet superpower with its own modern air force. The <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-weapons10-2008dec10,0,677429,full.story">L.A. Times</a> cites one such unmanned project as &#8220;a small blimp equipped with an automated high-powered sniper rifle that could provide a form of inexpensive but effective air support for platoons in Afghanistan.&#8221;</p>
<p>The decision is a dicey one, because while saving money in the Pentagon&#8217;s budget, a decision to axe the F-22 would mean a loss of jobs and defence contracts for U.S. workers. Unsurprisingly, the F-22&#8217;s most vocal supporters are in Congress; the jet uses parts from 1,000 suppliers spread across 44 states. That&#8217;s a lot of pork, and if we know there&#8217;s one way to make someone sad, it&#8217;s take away their pork. The NYTimes quotes Democratic congressman Norman Dicks saying &#8220;I think we&#8217;re going to keep the F-22 going, that&#8217;s my gut instinct.&#8221; Someone tell this dude that &#8220;following your gut&#8221; is so over! [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/us/politics/10jets.html?_r=1&#038;hp">NYTimes</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-weapons10-2008dec10,0,677429,full.story">LA Times</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_f22_raptor_may_be_replaced_bysniper_blimps-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office Depot to Close 112 Stores</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/office_depot_to_close_112_stores-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/office_depot_to_close_112_stores-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office depot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/office_depot_to_close_112_stores-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Financiapocalypse has claimed yet another victim. This time it is Office Depot&#8212;and they are planning to close 112 stores, or 9% of their North American locations over the next three months.


A list of the store closings has not been made available, but the breakdown will look like this: &#8220;45 stores in the Central U.S., 40 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/Office-Depot2.jpg" class="left"/>Financiapocalypse has claimed yet another victim. This time it is Office Depot&mdash;and they are planning to close 112 stores, or 9% of their North American locations over the next three months.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: financiapocalypse, office depot, store closings --><br />
<span id="more-318492"></span>
<p>A list of the store closings has not been made available, but the breakdown will look like this: &#8220;45 stores in the Central U.S., 40 in the Northeast and Canada, 19 in the West and eight in the South.&#8221; They are also shutting down six of their 33 distribution facilities and scaling back openings to 20 in 2009. [<a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081210/office_depot_strategic_review.html">Yahoo Finance</a> via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/40526/122/">TG Daily</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/office_depot_to_close_112_stores-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Stock Hits 10-Year Low</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a Jefferies Group analyst cut Microsoft&#8217;s 2009 revenue forecasts, Microsoft&#8217;s stock fell to its lowest levels since 1998. 
The projections were reduced due to &#8220;downward pressure on PC unit sales&#8221;, not Vista or lawsuits. And indeed, when you study Microsoft&#8217;s decline the past few months that&#8217;s right in line with the S&#038;P 500, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/microsoftstock.jpg" alt="" class="center" />After a Jefferies Group analyst cut Microsoft&#8217;s 2009 revenue forecasts, Microsoft&#8217;s stock fell to its lowest levels since 1998. <span id="more-315597"></span></p>
<p>The projections were reduced due to &#8220;downward pressure on PC unit sales&#8221;, not Vista or <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/hp_not_too_happy_about_the_vista_capable_standards_scandal-2.html">lawsuits</a>. And indeed, when you study Microsoft&#8217;s decline the past few months that&#8217;s right in line with the S&#038;P 500, it&#8217;s tough to blame anything but the generally crappy economy. [<a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/154278.asp?">Seattle PI</a> and <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/">Yahoo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHL Dies</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dhl_dies-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dhl_dies-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dhl_dies-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DHL, a popular shipping alternative to FedEx, UPS and the US Postal Service, has gone belly up in the ever more fun economic crisis. Today the company announced that it will end all domestic shipping services starting January 30th (which means 9,500 layoffs) while only international shipping to/from the US will remain. Hopefully one less [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/13505dhl.jpg" class="left"/>DHL, a popular shipping alternative to FedEx, UPS and the US Postal Service, has gone belly up in the ever more fun economic crisis. Today the company announced that it will end all domestic shipping services starting January 30th (which means 9,500 layoffs) while only international shipping to/from the US will remain. Hopefully one less competitor in the ring won&#8217;t increase all of our internet shipping costs too greatly. [<a href="http://www.dhl-usa.com/about/pr/PRDetail.asp?nav=PressRoom/PressReleases&#038;year=2008&#038;seq=1246">DHL</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: shipping, dhl, dhl closing, fedex, ups, usps --><span id="more-314428"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/dhl_dies-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia The Cheapest Place In The World To Buy iPods</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/australia_the_cheapest_place_in_the_world_to_buy_ipods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/australia_the_cheapest_place_in_the_world_to_buy_ipods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/australia_the_cheapest_place_in_the_world_to_buy_ipods.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That crappy Aussie dollar that we&#8217;ve been bitching about? Apparently it&#8217;s not all bad. Susannah Moran in Australian IT is reporting today that thanks to our dollar plunging so spectacularly in recent months, we&#8217;re now the cheapest country in the world to buy iPods, improving from a paltry 14th position back in July.
So what does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ipod-touch.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/images/2008/01/ipod-touch.jpg" width="225" height="254" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>That crappy Aussie dollar that we&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/dell_jacks_up_mini_9_price_to_699.html">been bitching about</a>? Apparently it&#8217;s not all bad. Susannah Moran in <a href="http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,24592753-15306,00.html">Australian IT</a> is reporting today that thanks to our dollar plunging so spectacularly in recent months, we&#8217;re now the cheapest country in the world to buy iPods, improving from a paltry 14th position back in July.</p>
<p>So what does this mean? Well, maybe you should <strike>consider buying your next iPod sooner rather than later to take advantage of our crappy economy</strike> consider getting any Poms, Yanks, or other tourists with a stronger dollar to buy you an iPod for Christmas. If they can afford it, that is&#8230;<br />
[<a href="http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,24592753-15306,00.html">Australian IT</a>]<span id="more-313319"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/australia_the_cheapest_place_in_the_world_to_buy_ipods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Weathers Crummy Economy, Sells 52 Million Phones Last Quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/samsung_weathers_crummy_economy_sells_52_million_phones_last_quarter-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/samsung_weathers_crummy_economy_sells_52_million_phones_last_quarter-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/samsung_weathers_crummy_economy_sells_52_million_phones_last_quarter-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony&#8217;s hurting, Apple&#8217;s soaring, and Samsung is doing fine, even as it definitely shows stress from the economy. Aggressive pricing and marketing are leading it to spend more to make more, driving overall profit down 44 percent from a year ago to $US850 million.

Its handset division led sales for the whole company, selling almost 52 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/instincts.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" /><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/sony_might_lose_money_this_year-2.html">Sony&#8217;s hurting</a>, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/apple_quarterly_earnings_69_million_iphones_sold_more_phones_than_rim-2.html">Apple&#8217;s soaring</a>, and Samsung is doing fine, even as it definitely shows stress from the economy. Aggressive pricing and marketing are leading it to spend more to make more, driving overall profit down 44 percent from a year ago to $US850 million.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: samsung, cellphones, earnings, money --><span id="more-312118"></span>
<p>Its handset division led sales for the whole company, selling almost 52 million phones, and pulling in roughly a third of its $US13.4 billion revenue. Interestingly, they&#8217;re using the Nokia strategy, with big pushes at the high- and low-end of the mobile market. If Samsung&#8217;s any indicator of the rest of the electronics industry&mdash;it&#8217;s probably a better one than Sony&mdash;times are tough, but the storm is weatherable. [<a href="http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20081024/WIRELESS/810249991/-1/rss01">RCR</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/samsung_weathers_crummy_economy_sells_52_million_phones_last_quarter-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>360-Degree New York Stock Exchange Panorama Shows Where The Action, Sadness Happens</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/360degree_new_york_stock_exchange_panorama_shows_where_the_action_sadness_happens-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/360degree_new_york_stock_exchange_panorama_shows_where_the_action_sadness_happens-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/360degree_new_york_stock_exchange_panorama_shows_where_the_action_sadness_happens-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computers have reduced tons of the bustle on the NYSE floor, but it&#8217;s still a pretty charged place. Here you can duck the telescoping trading terminals as you swoop around a full 360-degree flash panorama courtesy of the NYTimes. Can you feel the pain? [NYTimes - Thanks, Dan!]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2008/10/custom_1224861154704_NYSE_pano.png" style="display:block;float:none;" />Computers have reduced tons of the bustle on the NYSE floor, but it&#8217;s still a pretty charged place. Here you can duck the telescoping trading terminals as you swoop around a full 360-degree flash panorama courtesy of the NYTimes. Can you feel the pain? [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/10/23/business/20081023_NYSE_PANO.html">NYTimes</a> - <em>Thanks, Dan!</em>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: atlas shrugging, new york stock exchange, nyse, panorama, photography --><span id="more-312034"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/360degree_new_york_stock_exchange_panorama_shows_where_the_action_sadness_happens-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Might Lose Money This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/sony_might_lose_money_this_year-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/sony_might_lose_money_this_year-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/sony_might_lose_money_this_year-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If as Sony goes, so goes the rest of the consumer electronics industry, it&#8217;s totally screwed. They&#8217;ve just issued a grimtastic revision of their earnings forecast: Yearly profit outlook slashed by 38 percent from its July forecast of $US2.4 billion to just $US1.5 billion, and one Tokyo analyst says that &#8220;this is just the beginning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/ps3flowers_01.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />If as Sony goes, so goes the rest of the consumer electronics industry, it&#8217;s totally screwed. They&#8217;ve just issued a grimtastic revision of their earnings forecast: Yearly profit outlook slashed by 38 percent from its July forecast of $US2.4 billion to just $US1.5 billion, and one Tokyo analyst says that &#8220;this is just the beginning of a big earnings collapse,&#8221; in which Sony stands a &#8220;good chance&#8221; of losing money this year.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: sony, earnings, money money money --><span id="more-311854"></span>
<p>Part of their crappy outlook is thanks to a stronger yen, which makes exports more expensive, and its equity investments, but obviously the hard blow is coming from <a href="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/08revision_sony.pdf">worse-than-expected sales of LCDs, digital cameras and video cams</a>. Samsung and LG might fare better, but we&#8217;re looking forward to Microsoft&#8217;s earnings report today, since it might better indicate the health of the industry <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/apple_quarterly_earnings_69_million_iphones_sold_more_phones_than_rim-2.html">than Apple&#8217;s</a>. [<a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/economy/2008/10/23/sony-earnings-cut-markets-equity-cx_twdd_1023markets04.html">Forbes</a>, <em>Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shagy6six6/1875975778/">Shaggy6Six6</a>/Flickr</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/sony_might_lose_money_this_year-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
