<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; fauxlaroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/fauxlaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AnalogColor Ruins Quality Photos To Create Mock-Polaroid Results</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/analogcolor-ruins-quality-photos-to-create-mock-polaroid-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/analogcolor-ruins-quality-photos-to-create-mock-polaroid-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogcolor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fauxlaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid instant film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who cared enough to be hurt at the death of Polaroid Instant Film but not enough to make it themselves, there&#8217;s AnalogColor, which turns your crystal-clear photos into murky, nostalgic simulacrums of the classic format.
There&#8217;s definitely other software that&#8217;ll do this kind of thing, but AnalogColor lets you create faux-Polaroids by degrading your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/_dsc3666_effected.jpg" alt="" class="left" />For those who cared enough to be hurt at the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/polaroid_instant_film_killed_by_the_21st_century-2/">death</a> of Polaroid Instant Film but not enough to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/fans_get_one_step_closer_to_bringing_back_polaroid_film-2/">make it themselves</a>, there&#8217;s AnalogColor, which turns your crystal-clear photos into murky, nostalgic simulacrums of the classic format.<span id="more-340812"></span></p>
<p>There&#8217;s definitely other software that&#8217;ll do this kind of thing, but AnalogColor lets you create faux-Polaroids by degrading your current photos in several different ways, including those fun streaks that resulted from light leaks. It&#8217;s available for $US10 on OS X and Windows. [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A//www.pentacom.jp/pentacom/toycamera_analogcolor/%23buy&amp;hl=en&amp;langpair=auto|en&amp;tbb=1&amp;ie=UTF-8">Pentacom</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/fun-polaroid-simulator-will-waste-many-hours/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/analogcolor-ruins-quality-photos-to-create-mock-polaroid-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
