<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Virgin&#8217;s Velocity Frequent Flyer Program Is All Class</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/virgins-velocity-frequent-flyer-program-is-all-class/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/virgins-velocity-frequent-flyer-program-is-all-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, I was minding my own business when an email from Virgin&#8217;s frequent flyer program, Velocity, landed in my inbox. I&#8217;d been upgraded to Gold status because I was so close to making the grade. &#8220;Kinda weird&#8221; I thought to myself, considering I haven&#8217;t flown Virgin for over 12 months, &#8220;but a free upgrade [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/Velocity-stuffup.png"><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/11/Velocity-stuffup.png" alt="Velocity stuffup" title="Velocity stuffup" width="600" height="336" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-367131" /></a>Last Friday, I was minding my own business when an email from Virgin&#8217;s frequent flyer program, Velocity, landed in my inbox. I&#8217;d been upgraded to Gold status because I was so close to making the grade. &#8220;Kinda weird&#8221; I thought to myself, considering I haven&#8217;t flown Virgin for over 12 months, &#8220;but a free upgrade is a free upgrade&#8221;. Except it wasn&#8217;t, as the follow up email I got four hours later was so quick to point out.<span id="more-367130"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Oops! Due to an error you&#8217;ve received our previous email by mistake. Please disregard the free upgrade communication as unfortunately you do not qualify for that upgrade.</p>
<p>We apologise for any inconvenience caused.</p>
<p>Warm regards,</p>
<p>The Velocity Team</p></blockquote>
<p>From all accounts, it seems they sent the upgrade email to a pretty big chunk of their Velocity membership. </p>
<p>Considering I very rarely fly Virgin, I&#8217;m unsure whether or not I should be bemused or outraged at the mixup. Anyone want to suggest an emotion for me this morning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/virgins-velocity-frequent-flyer-program-is-all-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 Apple Products That Crashed And Burned</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/12-apple-products-that-crashed-and-burned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/12-apple-products-that-crashed-and-burned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not everything that Apple touches turns to gold. Case in point &#8212; the Apple Pippin gaming system. Never heard of it? Don&#8217;t worry, you are not alone. Like many of the other products on Oobject&#8217;s list, it failed miserably.
While certainly not on par with these 12 products, the Apple TV might be the most recent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/apple_fail.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_apple_fail.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Not everything that Apple touches turns to gold. Case in point &mdash; the Apple Pippin gaming system. Never heard of it? Don&#8217;t worry, you are not alone. Like many of the other products on <a href="http://www.oobject.com/category/12-failed-apple-products/">Oobject&#8217;s list</a>, it failed miserably.<span id="more-358780"></span></p>
<p>While certainly not on par with these 12 products, the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-tv-still-a-dud-after-price-cut/">Apple TV</a> might be the most recent Apple endeavour to fall well short of expectations. Clearly, there is no reason to spend a substantial sum of money on a box with limited functionality when there are better options available. [<a href="http://www.oobject.com/category/12-failed-apple-products/">Oobject</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/12-apple-products-that-crashed-and-burned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Been A Long Week</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/its-been-a-long-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/its-been-a-long-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable media players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel exactly the same way, and it&#8217;s only Thursday. [BBG]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/zunefail.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_zunefail.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I feel exactly the same way, and it&#8217;s only Thursday. [<a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/09/15/zunehd-launched-appa.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/its-been-a-long-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Stadium Continues Streak Of Giant Screen Fails</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dallas-cowboys-stadium-continues-streak-of-giant-screen-fails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dallas-cowboys-stadium-continues-streak-of-giant-screen-fails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=352286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After their giant screen blocked a punt, you&#8217;d figure the owners of the Dallas Cowboys stadium would be extra careful with their massive displays&#8212;but it looks like somebody didn&#8217;t shut down his computer properly. Whoops! [Thanks, Richard!]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSCN1008.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSCN1008.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>After their giant screen <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/punt-hits-worlds-largest-hd-video-screen-in-cowboys-stadium/">blocked a punt</a>, you&#8217;d figure the owners of the Dallas Cowboys stadium would be extra careful with their massive displays&mdash;but it looks like somebody didn&#8217;t shut down his computer properly. Whoops! [<em>Thanks, Richard!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/dallas-cowboys-stadium-continues-streak-of-giant-screen-fails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s One For The PC Fanboys&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/heres-one-for-the-pc-fanboys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/heres-one-for-the-pc-fanboys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See? We&#8217;re not Apple fanboys. We show off all operating systems&#8217; failings here at Gizmodo. It&#8217;s not our fault we see one type more than the other. Or that saying &#8220;Blue Screen of Death&#8221; is just so damned catchy&#8230;
[Thanks Matt!]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/08/iphone-display-bsod.jpg" alt="iphone-display-bsod" title="iphone-display-bsod" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-349622" />See? We&#8217;re not Apple fanboys. We show off all operating systems&#8217; failings here at Gizmodo. It&#8217;s not <em>our</em> fault we see one type more than the other. Or that saying &#8220;Blue Screen of Death&#8221; is just so damned catchy&#8230;</p>
<p>[<em>Thanks Matt!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/heres-one-for-the-pc-fanboys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Mandatory Filter Trial ISP Only Had 15 Customers Opt In&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/one-mandatory-filter-trial-isp-only-had-15-customers-opt-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/one-mandatory-filter-trial-isp-only-had-15-customers-opt-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=343252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like we needed more proof that Conroy&#8217;s mandatory filter is a complete waste of time and money – ARN has reported that one of the ISPs involved in the trial – Nelson Bay Online – had just 15 people opt in, or about one percent of their customers. Yeah, that&#8217;s a surefire way to get some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/internet%20filter2.jpg" title="internet filter" class="aligncenter" width="425" height="282" />Like we needed more proof that Conroy&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/filter/">mandatory filter</a> is a complete waste of time and money – <a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/312354/isps_give_clean_feed_filter_technical_green-light">ARN</a> has reported that one of the ISPs involved in the trial – Nelson Bay Online – had just <em>15 people</em> opt in, or about one percent of their customers. Yeah, that&#8217;s a surefire way to get some useful information, right there.<span id="more-343252"></span></p>
<p>Apparently many of the ISPs involved in the trial are reporting that there wasn&#8217;t really any noticeable slowdown in Internet speeds. But considering the numbers, that&#8217;s not really a surprise. After all, if only 15 people were to attend an event at the MCG, getting out at the end of the match would be super-fast.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/312845/statistics_experts_label_isp_filtering_trials_unscientific?fp=16&#038;fpid=1">ARN</a> also quoted some statistics experts who essentially say that the results are complete BS in the eyes of science. The downside is that the government is likely to twist the results to reflect the positive aspects of the trial, and neglect the fact that there weren&#8217;t actually any large numbers of people involved.</p>
<p>As always, keep voicing your displeasure at this intrinsically flawed Government plan to fuck up the internet.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/312354/isps_give_clean_feed_filter_technical_green-light">ARN</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/one-mandatory-filter-trial-isp-only-had-15-customers-opt-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entire 13-Story Building Collapses In Shanghai, Only One Person Killed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entire-13-story-building-collapses-in-shanghai-only-one-person-killed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entire-13-story-building-collapses-in-shanghai-only-one-person-killed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building falls over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dianpu river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past Saturday, an entire apartment building in Shanghai collapsed. To be fair, the building was under construction and thus unoccupied, but it&#8217;s still a minor miracle that there was only one fatality.
Sounds like there was a problem with some nearby flood prevention walls at the Dianpu River, but there&#8217;s no hard evidence as to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/timber2.jpg" alt="" class="left" />This past Saturday, an entire apartment building in Shanghai collapsed. To be fair, the building was under construction and thus unoccupied, but it&#8217;s still a minor miracle that there was only one fatality.<span id="more-339885"></span></p>
<p>Sounds like there was a problem with some nearby flood prevention walls at the Dianpu River, but there&#8217;s no hard evidence as to why this huge building simply fell over. Anyway, here are some sweet pictures of the architectural carnage. [<a href="http://cellar.org/iotd.php">Cellar.org</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/redw0rm/status/2398819240">Twitter</a>]</p>
<p><a name="galleryplaceholder" id="galleryplaceholder"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entire-13-story-building-collapses-in-shanghai-only-one-person-killed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolfram Alpha Fail Is Appropriately Nerdy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/wolfram_alpha_fail_is_appropriately_nerdy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/wolfram_alpha_fail_is_appropriately_nerdy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/wolfram_alpha_fail_is_appropriately_nerdy-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Wolfram Alpha, the dorktastic computational search engine, got off to a bit of a rocky start when it launched last night. At least its first fail message had the foresight to include a HAL reference.


As it&#8217;s an alpha, we&#8217;re not too bothered that it&#8217;s run into some overload problems. Hey, at least people are using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/8839805.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Wolfram Alpha, the dorktastic computational search engine, got off to a bit of a rocky start when it launched last night. At least its first fail message had the foresight to include a HAL reference.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: fail, google, search engines, wolfram alpha, wolfram alpha fail --><br />
<span id="more-335991"></span>
<p>As it&#8217;s an alpha, we&#8217;re not too bothered that it&#8217;s run into some overload problems. Hey, at least people are using it, right? But be warned, Wolfie: A pithy error message can only charm us for so long. [via <a href="http://twitter.com/harrymccracken/status/1813105134">Twitter</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/wolfram_alpha_fail_is_appropriately_nerdy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK&#8217;s MI6 Scrapped Multi-Million Dollar Undercover Operation Because of Lost USB Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/uks_mi6_scrapped_multimillion_dollar_undercover_operation_because_of_lost_usb_drive-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/uks_mi6_scrapped_multimillion_dollar_undercover_operation_because_of_lost_usb_drive-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mi6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thumbdrives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/uks_mi6_scrapped_multimillion_dollar_undercover_operation_because_of_lost_usb_drive-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
You&#8217;d think MI6 agents would handle top-secret data more carefully than on memory stick in a purse, right? Well that purse was left behind on a train in 2006, compromising a multi-million dollar drug operation.


Secure Computing says that an agent only known as T was responsible for the gaffe, which took place on a Colombian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1241220448233_mi6-fail.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>You&#8217;d think MI6 agents would handle top-secret data more carefully than on memory stick in a purse, right? Well that purse was <a href="http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/143493,mi6-scrapped-major-drug-operation-after-data-loss.aspx">left behind on a train</a> in 2006, compromising a multi-million dollar drug operation.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: security, data, espionage, fail, intelligence, memory sticks, mi6, mi6 memory stick, mi6 usb drive, storage, usb drives --><br />
<span id="more-335279"></span>
<p>Secure Computing says that an agent only known as T was responsible for the gaffe, which took place on a Colombian passenger train. Apparently the fallout from the incident resulted in a number of agents having to be relocated for safety purposes. But MI6 assures us all that <em>they now</em> take more secure precautions with sensitive data. [<a href="http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/143493,mi6-scrapped-major-drug-operation-after-data-loss.aspx">Secure Computing</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/mi6-nixed-major-undercover-operation-after-memory-stick-lost/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/uks_mi6_scrapped_multimillion_dollar_undercover_operation_because_of_lost_usb_drive-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In a Fight Between Candle and Laptop, Candle Usually Wins</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/in_a_fight_between_candle_and_laptop_candle_usually_wins-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/in_a_fight_between_candle_and_laptop_candle_usually_wins-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/in_a_fight_between_candle_and_laptop_candle_usually_wins-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Here&#8217;s a tip: never, ever leave a big candle burning over your computer. Ever. [FailBlog]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/fail-owned-candle-fail.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a tip: never, ever leave a big candle burning over your computer. Ever. [<a href="http://failblog.org/2009/04/13/candle-fail/">FailBlog</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: machine vs nature, bad ideas, candles, fail, laptops, retromodo, wax --><br />
<span id="more-333898"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/in_a_fight_between_candle_and_laptop_candle_usually_wins-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
