<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LG Touchscreen GD910 Watch Phone Finally Arrives For $US1,270</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/lg-touchscreen-gd910-watch-phone-finally-arrives-for-us1270/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/lg-touchscreen-gd910-watch-phone-finally-arrives-for-us1270/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gd910]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg gd910 watch phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=344739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LG touchscreen GD910 watch phone we&#8217;ve been talking about since at least December is finally here.
Asking price with two-year contract is an astounding $US1,270 because tired, overdone Dick Tracy fantasies and allusions by gadget bloggers are anything but cheap. The presser says this is the &#8220;starting price&#8221; so the one-year contract might actually be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/504x_LGCES_5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_504x_LGCES_5.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/lg_touchscreen_watch_phone_will_support_3g_speech_recognition_little_girl_fingers-2/">LG touchscreen GD910 watch phone</a> we&#8217;ve been talking about since <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/lg_touchscreen_watch_phone_will_support_3g_speech_recognition_little_girl_fingers-2/">at least December</a> is finally here.<span id="more-344739"></span></p>
<p>Asking price with two-year contract is an astounding $US1,270 because tired, overdone Dick Tracy fantasies and allusions by gadget bloggers are anything but cheap. The presser says this is the &#8220;starting price&#8221; so the one-year contract might actually be more (that&#8217;s admittedly a guess on my part, as additional contract subsidising details are not given).</p>
<p>As we reported in July, the phone will be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/lgs-gd910-watch-phone-hits-uk-in-august/">exclusive to Orange</a> in France for the time being. Global distribution, hinted at before, is still unclear. [<a href="http://www.francetelecom.com/en_EN/press/press_releases/cp090807en.jsp">France Telecom</a> <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/08/08/lg-watchphone-priced-by-orange/">OhGizmo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/lg-touchscreen-gd910-watch-phone-finally-arrives-for-us1270/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung &#8220;World&#8217;s Thinnest&#8221; Watchphone Also Happens To Be One Of The World&#8217;s Only Watchphones</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/samsung-worlds-thinnest-watchphone-also-happens-to-be-one-of-the-worlds-only-watchphones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/samsung-worlds-thinnest-watchphone-also-happens-to-be-one-of-the-worlds-only-watchphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung s9110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartwatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung&#8217;s only real watchphone competitor hasn&#8217;t even launched its product yet, so it&#8217;s a little early for the marketing oneupmanship. Regardless, the S9110 is an impressive piece of kit, with a 1.76-inch touchscreen, Bluetooth, email support and MP3 playback.
Rounding out the feature list are a few watchphone necessities, like voice recognition and speakerphone, all in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_s9110.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Samsung&#8217;s only real watchphone competitor hasn&#8217;t even <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/07/06/orange-to-finally-launch-lg-gd910-watch-phone-next-month/">launched its product</a> yet, so it&#8217;s a <em>little</em> early for the marketing oneupmanship. Regardless, the S9110 is an impressive piece of kit, with a 1.76-inch touchscreen, Bluetooth, email support and MP3 playback.<span id="more-342455"></span></p>
<p>Rounding out the feature list are a few watchphone necessities, like voice recognition and speakerphone, all in a package that measures in at about 12mm thick&mdash;bulkier than your average Swatch, but well within acceptable wristwear territory. The first wave of releases will be scattered throughout Europe, starting in France, where the S9110 will retail for around $US650.</p>
<p>The most striking thing about this&mdash;as well as the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/lgs_gd910_james_bond_approved_watch_phone_to_start_production_this_year-2/">LG GD910</a>&mdash;is that unlike pretty much every watchphone we&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/his_and_her_watch_phones_good_for_dick_tracy_fantasy_role_play-2/">seen before</a>, these might be usable on a day to day basis, granted you&#8217;re willing to accept the inherent awkwardness of the watchphone form factor. No word on a stateside release yet, but import costs aren&#8217;t likely to stop the kinds of dapper jetsetting gentleman and/or independently wealthy James Bond superfan who&#8217;ll be buying this thing anyway. [<a href="http://www.samsunghub.com/2009/07/22/samsung-unveils-worlds-thinnest-watchphone-s9110/">SamsungHub</a> via <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/07/21/samsung-one-ups-lg-announces-the-worlds-thinnest-watchphone-s9110/">Mobilecrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/samsung-worlds-thinnest-watchphone-also-happens-to-be-one-of-the-worlds-only-watchphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Can&#8217;t We Get A Standard Phone Charger Like Europe?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/why-cant-we-get-a-standard-phone-charger-like-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/why-cant-we-get-a-standard-phone-charger-like-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microusb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=339789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, LG, NEC, Qualcomm, RIM, Samsung and Apple have all agreed to use the microUSB standard in their phones made for the European market. Why can&#8217;t we have that?
No idea. We&#8217;re surprised that Apple is getting in on this agreement, though, and we&#8217;re wondering if the microUSB port will supplement or replace [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/minimicro.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, LG, NEC, Qualcomm, RIM, Samsung and Apple have all agreed to use the microUSB standard in their phones made for the European market. Why can&#8217;t we have that?<span id="more-339789"></span></p>
<p>No idea. We&#8217;re surprised that Apple is getting in on this agreement, though, and we&#8217;re wondering if the microUSB port will supplement or replace the standard Apple 30-pin iPod port. We&#8217;re guessing supplement.</p>
<p>As a refresher, you should go and look back at our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_an_illustrated_guide_to_every_stupid_cable_you_need-2/">cable explainer</a> to see what other kinds of cables are out there now. [<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE55S1XZ20090629?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=11559">Reuters</a> via <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/06/29/1441209/Standard-Cellphone-Chargers-For-Europeans">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/why-cant-we-get-a-standard-phone-charger-like-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Windows 7 Will Ship Without IE</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/european-windows-7-will-ship-without-ie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/european-windows-7-will-ship-without-ie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7 europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that half of you will care, but Microsoft&#8217;s going to ship Windows 7 in Europe without IE8 bundled. That doesn&#8217;t mean Europeans won&#8217;t be able to get IE8&#8212;OEMs can shove them into their installs if they want, and end users can download IE8 themselves as well. [Ars Technica]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that half of you will care, but Microsoft&#8217;s going to ship Windows 7 in Europe without IE8 bundled. That doesn&#8217;t mean Europeans won&#8217;t be able to get IE8&mdash;OEMs can shove them into their installs if they want, and end users can download IE8 themselves as well. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/06/windows-7-to-be-shipped-in-europe-sans-internet-explorer.ars">Ars Technica</a>]<span id="more-337544"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/european-windows-7-will-ship-without-ie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD to Intel: Nyah Nyah Nyah Nyah Nyah</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/amd_to_intel_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/amd_to_intel_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/amd_to_intel_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the European Union smacked Intel with a $US1.45 billion fine for breaking antitrust laws, AMD responded in the most mature way possible: By mercilessly rubbing it in on the front page of its site.


Aside from the large EU flag flying on its front page, AMD also includes an extensive amount of information on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/amd-eu-homepage-2.jpg" alt="" />After the European Union smacked Intel with a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/intel_smacked_with_staggering_145_billion_fine_in_euro_antitrust_case-2.html">$US1.45 <em>billion</em> fine</a> for breaking antitrust laws, AMD responded in the most mature way possible: By mercilessly rubbing it in on the front page of its site.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: fights, amd, amd intel, antitrust, break free, eu, intel --><br />
<span id="more-335993"></span>
<p>Aside from the large EU flag flying on its front page, AMD also includes an extensive amount of information on the ruling with <a href="http://breakfree.amd.com/en-us/default.aspx">a page entitled &#8220;Break Free.&#8221;</a> That page includes anti-Intel sentiment from various respectable news organisations. All we can say to that is, where&#8217;s the love? Here, AMD, I&#8217;ve got a quote all packaged up for you from our own John Herrman:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ok, that [Intel's suspected antitrust violation] does sound pretty bad.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bam! [via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10242372-64.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/amd_to_intel_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah_nyah-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Second Largest Wireless Carrier Kills International Roaming Charges</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/worlds_second_largest_wireless_carrier_kills_international_roaming_charges-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/worlds_second_largest_wireless_carrier_kills_international_roaming_charges-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/worlds_second_largest_wireless_carrier_kills_international_roaming_charges-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
From June 1st, customers of Vodafone, the world&#8217;s second largest wireless carrier, will be able to text and call from over 35 countries at no extra charge. Attention American carriers: Be more like this.


The service, called &#8220;Passport&#8221;, will be available as a three-month summer trial for UK subscribers, and can be activated for free. Customers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/voda.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>From June 1st, customers of Vodafone, the world&#8217;s second largest wireless carrier, will be able to text and call from over 35 countries at <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/5322982/Vodafone-drops-roaming-charges-for-overseas-calls">no extra charge</a>. Attention American carriers: Be more like this.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: vodafone, eu, european union, roaming, roaming charges, vodafone roaming, wireless carriers --><br />
<span id="more-335872"></span>
<p>The service, called &#8220;Passport&#8221;, will be available as a three-month summer trial for UK subscribers, and can be activated for free. Customers will be able to travel to just about any country that Vodafone operates in and tap into the minute and text allocations from their regular plan, or in the case of pay-as-you-go customers, call and text at their usual domestic rate. Data roaming still applies, but come July it&#8217;ll be capped at about $1.40 per megabyte as per new EU regulations.</p>
<p>As someone who&#8217;s stuck in concurrent T-Mobile contracts in two separate countries, I take this news kind of personally. Steep roaming charges make <em>some</em> sense when you&#8217;re jumping between carriers, but they&#8217;re stupidly frustrating when you&#8217;re paying way more for services from a different arm of the same company. </p>
<p>This obviously doesn&#8217;t mean much for Americans (although Voda does own a 45% stake in Verizon), but it does represent a precedent we should all push for. Aside from steep taxes (as in the UK), it&#8217;s mainly plain old price gouging&mdash;of carriers by other carriers, or of customers by <em>their</em> carriers&mdash;that keeps prices so high.<br />
<blockquote>Although this announcement means that British Vodafone customers in Australia will get cheap phone calls, it doesn&#8217;t work the other way around for Australian Vda customers travelling abroad. Yet. Hopefully Vodafone will roll it out across their global network soon though.</p></blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/5322982/Vodafone-drops-roaming-charges-for-overseas-calls.html">Telegraph</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/worlds_second_largest_wireless_carrier_kills_international_roaming_charges-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Smacked With Staggering $US1.45 Billion Fine in Euro Antitrust Case</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/intel_smacked_with_staggering_145_billion_fine_in_euro_antitrust_case-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/intel_smacked_with_staggering_145_billion_fine_in_euro_antitrust_case-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/intel_smacked_with_staggering_145_billion_fine_in_euro_antitrust_case-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the largest trust-busting fining in EU history&#8212;about twice as severe as the infamous Microsoft antitrust ruling of 2004 and a hair worse than the ensuing $US1.44 billion penalty for noncompliance&#8212;Intel has been ordered to pay $1.45 billion by European Commission regulators. What the hell did they do? 
EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes said Intel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the largest trust-busting fining in EU history&mdash;about twice as severe as the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/EU-slaps-record-fine-on-Microsoft/2100-1001_3-5178281.html?tag=txt">infamous Microsoft antitrust ruling</a> of 2004 and a hair worse than the ensuing $US1.44 billion penalty for noncompliance&mdash;Intel has been ordered to pay $1.45 billion by European Commission regulators. What the hell did they do?<br /> <br />
<blockquote>EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes said Intel had pursued a strategy aimed mainly at excluding A.M.D. by paying computer makers and retailers to postpone, cancel or avoid A.M.D. products entirely.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: intel, 1.45 billion intel fine, amd, antitrust, ec, eu, european union, intel antitrust fine, intel fine --><br />
<span id="more-335812"></span>
<p>Ok, that does sound pretty bad. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/business/global/14compete.html?_r=1&#038;hp">NYT</a><em>&mdash;Thanks, Mikael!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/intel_smacked_with_staggering_145_billion_fine_in_euro_antitrust_case-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swedish Pirate Party Expected to Win (Not Plunder) A Seat in E.U. Parliament</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/swedish_pirate_party_expected_to_win_not_plunder_a_seat_in_eu_parliament-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/swedish_pirate_party_expected_to_win_not_plunder_a_seat_in_eu_parliament-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/swedish_pirate_party_expected_to_win_not_plunder_a_seat_in_eu_parliament-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It looks like Europe is just as taken with the Pirate Party as we at Giz are, because a recent electoral poll shows them with enough votes to secure a seat in the E.U. Parliament.


The guilty verdict handed down to the Pirate Bay leaders resulted in a huge amount of publicity and popularity for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/463px-Piratpartiet.svg.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>It looks like Europe is just as taken with the Pirate Party as we at Giz are, because a recent electoral poll shows them with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/swedens_pirate_party_makes_a_run_for_the_eu_parliament-2.html">enough votes</a> to secure a seat in the E.U. Parliament.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: piracy, bittorrent, e.u. parliament, elections, pirate party, polls, sweden --><br />
<span id="more-336339"></span>
<p>The guilty verdict handed down to the Pirate Bay leaders resulted in a huge amount of publicity and popularity for the Pirate Party, regardless of the fact that the two are not officially related. Membership has shot up to a record 42,000+, and a recent poll to check out the frontrunners in the E.U. election showed even rosier numbers.</p>
<p>The Pirate Party is now the second-most popular party for voters 18-30, and Swedish newspaper DN.se predicts a vote of 5.1% in the election, which will be enough for a seat in Parliament. Sure, it&#8217;s a minority vote (and that&#8217;s being generous), but a pirate can surely stand his ground. [<a href="http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/unga-valjare-kan-ge-piratpartiet-eu-mandat-1.855936">DN.se</a> (warning: Swedish) via <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/swedish-pirate-party-heading-for-eu-parliament-090430/">TorrentFreak</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/swedish_pirate_party_expected_to_win_not_plunder_a_seat_in_eu_parliament-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Magic Launches A Week Early in Spain, Just to Spite the British</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/htc_magic_launches_a_week_early_in_spain_just_to_spite_the_british-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/htc_magic_launches_a_week_early_in_spain_just_to_spite_the_british-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/htc_magic_launches_a_week_early_in_spain_just_to_spite_the_british-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In a rather excited post on Vodafone Spain&#8217;s blog, the company has announced that the HTC Magic, set for a May 5th release across Europe, will be &#8220;available&#8221; today. ¿Por qué? No sé.


Of course, given the ambiguous language of the post (or my poor Spanish comprehension), they could be jerking everyone around a little bit, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/earlymagic.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>In a rather <a href="http://www.unandroideenvodafone.com/noticia.php?id_post=18">excited post</a> on Vodafone Spain&#8217;s blog, the company has announced that the HTC Magic, set for a May 5th release across Europe, will be &#8220;available&#8221; <em>today</em>. ¿Por qué? No sé.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: htc magic, android, htc, htc magic early release, htc magic release date, htc magic spanish release, spain, vodaphone --><br />
<span id="more-334998"></span>
<p>Of course, given the ambiguous language of the post (or my poor Spanish comprehension), they could be jerking everyone around a little bit, promoting the opening of pre-orders as <em>actual</em> availability. That they explicitly tout their release as earlier than the previous May 5th date, though, seems to indicate that they&#8217;ll actually start shipping today. Happy <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/meet_the_i7500_samsungs_first_android_phone-2.html">crazy Android surprise day</a>, Spain!</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Our resident Spaniard has confirmed that the post implies it&#8217;ll <em>ship</em> today from the online store, but that brick-and-mortar stores will have to wait until next week. [<a href="http://phandroid.com/2009/04/27/surpise-htc-magic-launches-in-spain/">Phandroid</a> <em>&mdash;Thanks, Rob!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/htc_magic_launches_a_week_early_in_spain_just_to_spite_the_british-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Union Considering a Ban on Carrier VoIP Filtering</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/european_union_considering_a_ban_on_carrier_voip_filtering-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/european_union_considering_a_ban_on_carrier_voip_filtering-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/european_union_considering_a_ban_on_carrier_voip_filtering-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EU&#8217;s next technological crusade could be against traffic-blocking mobile carriers, according to a German newspaper. Brussels be warned: you should expect a hell of a fight over this one.


A proposal has already been drafted, challenging carriers who disallow VoIP traffic over their 3G networks. Deconstructed, this kind of selective connection seems fundamentally wrong: these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/euskype.jpg" alt="" />The EU&#8217;s next technological crusade could be against traffic-blocking mobile carriers, according to a <a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&#038;sl=de&#038;u=http://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/&#038;ei=EwfjScPQBseMjAejnYnVDQ&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=translate&#038;resnum=1&#038;ct=result&#038;prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DyCy">German newspaper</a>. Brussels be warned: you should expect a <em>hell</em> of a fight over this one.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: antitrust, cellular voip, european union voip, voice over ip, voip, wireless carriers eu regulations --><br />
<span id="more-333870"></span>
<p>A proposal has already been drafted, challenging carriers who disallow VoIP traffic over their 3G networks. Deconstructed, this kind of selective connection seems fundamentally wrong: these carriers are choosing to block certain data not for traffic management reasons, but to sabotage competing services. But the sheer magnitude of the competitive threat&mdash;the possibility that VoIP over mobile data could completely destroy conventional voice services&mdash;at least explains <em>why</em> companies do this, and why regulatory bodies have been so reluctant to touch the issue.</p>
<p>At this stage, it&#8217;s a distant issue for US carriers, much less mobile users. But an EU/Trade Commission intervention into the European wireless industry could at least remind US regulators that, yes, filtering wireless data for anticompetitive purposes is actually <em>kind of a dick move</em>. [<a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&#038;sl=de&#038;u=http://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/&#038;ei=EwfjScPQBseMjAejnYnVDQ&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=translate&#038;resnum=1&#038;ct=result&#038;prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DyCy">Handelsblatt</a> via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/42003/118/">TGDaily</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/european_union_considering_a_ban_on_carrier_voip_filtering-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
