<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; entertainment geekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/entertainment-geekly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are Augmented Reality Sites Now Mandatory For All Sci-Fi Films?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/are-augmented-reality-sites-now-mandatory-for-all-sci-fi-films/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/are-augmented-reality-sites-now-mandatory-for-all-sci-fi-films/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=343491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First it was Star Trek. Then Transformers got in on the action. Now upcoming Peter Jackson alien thrill ride District 9 has its own augmented reality website. Sadly, it&#8217;s a little disappointing.
The app introduces you to the world of MNU, or Multi-National United, a military organisation that obviously operates in the film. By printing off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/district9-augmented-reality.png" alt="district9-augmented-reality" title="district9-augmented-reality" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-343493" />First it was <em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/augmented_reality_app_puts_a_3d_starship_enterprise_in_the_palm_of_your_hand-2/">Star Trek</a></em>. Then <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/you-too-can-wear-the-head-of-optimus-prime-in-augmented-reality-of-course/"><em>Transformers</em></a> got in on the action. Now upcoming Peter Jackson alien thrill ride <em>District 9</em> has its own augmented reality website. Sadly, it&#8217;s a little disappointing.<span id="more-343491"></span></p>
<p>The app introduces you to the world of MNU, or Multi-National United, a military organisation that obviously operates in the film. By printing off a District 9 image and holding it up to your computers webcam, you can watch a 3D model of a MNU soldier rappell, take down an alien and shoot his gun; check out the alien spaceship and study the alien creatures from the movie. Moving the picture around moves the 3D model, and the closer you get to the camera the bigger the model. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s about it&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really liking the practical applications of augmented reality, and looking forward to checking out the <em>District 9</em> film, but this whole exercise doesn&#8217;t actually offer anything compelling to market the film. </p>
<p>If you want to check it out for yourself (it might kill about 10 minutes of your day), click the link below.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.multinationalunited.com/training/">Multi-National United</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/are-augmented-reality-sites-now-mandatory-for-all-sci-fi-films/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ve Never Seen The Matrix Like This</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/youve-never-seen-the-matrix-like-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/youve-never-seen-the-matrix-like-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the matrix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have no idea whether this clip of a Bollywood adaption of The Matrix is real. I have no idea whether it&#8217;s actually part of an Indian version of the film, or just some clip that wound up on YouTube. But dear god it&#8217;s addictive. Like heroin laced candybars.
Likewise, I have no idea if this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/59afzXs_q0Y&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/59afzXs_q0Y&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
I have no idea whether this clip of a Bollywood adaption of <em>The Matrix</em> is real. I have no idea whether it&#8217;s actually part of an Indian version of the film, or just some clip that wound up on YouTube. But dear god it&#8217;s addictive. Like heroin laced candybars.<span id="more-342686"></span></p>
<p>Likewise, I have no idea if this Bollywood mashup of <em>The Matrix</em> and <em>Terminator 2</em> is part of the same film or something very different. Either way, once seen, you can never unsee it.<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xxFRUTKExMo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xxFRUTKExMo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Total awesomeness, or tragic destruction of creativity? Discuss.</p>
<p>[<em>Thanks Kevin!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/youve-never-seen-the-matrix-like-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Zack Snyder Live Watchmen Screening For Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/no-zack-snyder-live-watchmen-screening-for-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/no-zack-snyder-live-watchmen-screening-for-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bd live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truth be told, we didn&#8217;t expect that the BD-Live screening of Watchmen hosted by director Zack Snyder would ever make it here to Australia. But we&#8217;ve had confirmation from Paramount that we definitely won&#8217;t get to sit back and chat with Snyder during the community screening US owners of the Blu-ray will experience.
Perhaps more disappointing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/watchmen__2_disc___blu_ray__3d_package_low.jpg" alt="watchmen__2_disc___blu_ray__3d_package_low" title="watchmen__2_disc___blu_ray__3d_package_low" class="alignright size-full wp-image-341879" />Truth be told, we didn&#8217;t expect that the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/zack-snyder-to-host-watchmen-screening-over-bd-live/">BD-Live screening of Watchmen</a> hosted by director Zack Snyder would ever make it here to Australia. But we&#8217;ve had confirmation from Paramount that we definitely won&#8217;t get to sit back and chat with Snyder during the community screening US owners of the Blu-ray will experience.<span id="more-341877"></span></p>
<p>Perhaps more disappointing is the fact that the version on sale in Australia on July 30 isn&#8217;t actually the Director&#8217;s Cut of the film – we only get a 2-Disc special edition, which doesn&#8217;t look like it includes the &#8220;<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/watchmen-blu-ray-bringing-awesome-maximum-movie-mode-video-commentary/">Maximum Movie Mode</a>&#8221; we&#8217;ve seen before either.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that this sucks for <em>Watchmen</em> fans, I&#8217;d still class the film as a &#8220;must-have&#8221; Blu-ray purchase when it hits shelves in just under two weeks. And as an added bonus, it&#8217;s good to know that the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/lightning_review_emwatchmen_the_complete_motion_comicem_bluray-2/">complete motion comic Blu-ray</a> will also hit shelves the same day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/no-zack-snyder-live-watchmen-screening-for-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Geekly: My Bloody Valentine 3D Blu-ray Review</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/entertainment-geekly-my-bloody-valentine-3d-blu-ray-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/entertainment-geekly-my-bloody-valentine-3d-blu-ray-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaglyph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereoscopic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If 3D is supposed to be the future of home entertainment, and this is the best Blu-ray has to offer, I think I&#8217;ll stick with 2D&#8230;
There are so many, many reasons that My Bloody Valentine 3D doesn&#8217;t work in a home theatre environment. And this has nothing to do with the movie itself, but more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/07/my-bloody-valentine-3d.jpg" alt="my-bloody-valentine-3d" title="my-bloody-valentine-3d" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-340290" />If 3D is supposed to be the future of home entertainment, and this is the best Blu-ray has to offer, I think I&#8217;ll stick with 2D&#8230;<span id="more-340288"></span></p>
<p>There are so many, many reasons that <em>My Bloody Valentine 3D</em> doesn&#8217;t work in a home theatre environment. And this has nothing to do with the movie itself, but more the problems with the 3D technologies used. </p>
<p>For a start, the Blu-ray disc comes with a couple of pairs of <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/giz_explains_3d_technologies-2/">3D anaglyph cardboard glasses</a>. This is probably the biggest let down – Instead of using the same technology as the cinema release with the polarised glasses, instead the entire film is a complete washout of pink. Nothing detracts from a film like losing all the colour from every scene. Not only that, but the 3D effect given by the anaglyph glasses is minor at best – a key scene where a pickaxe violently dislodges an eyeball has very little impact in terms of 3D</p>
<p>Second is the problem of distance. When I sat down with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/entertainment_geekly_the_push_for_a_3d_cinema_revolution/">CEO of Dreamworks Jeffrey Katzenburg</a>, one of the concerns he voiced was that for 3D to work properly, it needs to reach your peripheral vision. Even with 50 inches of plasma mounted on my wall, for the screen to hit my peripheral vision I&#8217;d need to be standing less than a metre away, which just doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Fortunately the Blu-ray disc also features a 2D version, letting you watch the film without the red/green glasses. Whether that in itself is enough to convince you to give it a go is another matter altogether, but ultimately, <em>My Bloody Valentine 3D</em> is proof that 3D is still a long way from being a part of your home cinema experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/entertainment-geekly-my-bloody-valentine-3d-blu-ray-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Geekly: Transformers 2 Film Review</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entertainment-geekly-transformers-2-film-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entertainment-geekly-transformers-2-film-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the Australian premiere of Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen on Tuesday night, Aussie Home &#038; Away graduate Isabel Lucas (who stars in the film) said that there are double the explosions compared to the first film. She was wrong – it&#8217;s more like quadruple the amount. And that&#8217;s not including the nuked fridge&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/06/transformers-2-review-545x400.png" alt="transformers-2-review" title="transformers-2-review" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-338536" />At the Australian premiere of <em>Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen</em> on Tuesday night, Aussie <em>Home &#038; Away</em> graduate Isabel Lucas (who stars in the film) said that there are double the explosions compared to the first film. She was wrong – it&#8217;s more like quadruple the amount. And that&#8217;s not including the nuked fridge&#8230; (Warning: Lots of spoilers follow!)<span id="more-338518"></span></p>
<p>The truth about Transformers 2 is that it&#8217;s a BIG movie, in every sense of the word. Michael Bay likes making shit explode, and he has a field day with this film. The robots are huge, the explosions are massive, the gratuitous shots of Megan Fox&#8217;s body are frequent and the laughs are solid. Even the running time is big, running at 147 minutes. By the time you walk out of the cinema, you feel like you&#8217;re coming down from an insane Red Bull binge.</p>
<p>The film starts off relatively modestly with a scene from about 20,000 BC where cavemen and primitive Transformers battle it out to the tune of an Optimus Prime voiceover about how our two races have a history. Then it cuts to present day China, where the Autobots and the US military are rounding up and hunting down Decepticons. Cue massive explosions, robot-on-robot battles and other special effects eye-candy. This is where the film excels: the special effects do look magnificent – you believe every moment of the robots transforming and battling it out on the streets of Shanghai.</p>
<p>So far so good. We move from Shanghai to Shia LaBeouf and his move to college, and the plot starts moving forwards. There are some nice comedic moments, some Megan Fox skin, some Isabel Lucas skin and then BAM! Isabel Lucas is a Transformer! A hot, college student Transformer! Because Transformers can now transform metal into skin&#8230;</p>
<p>To be honest, while actually watching the film, I took this turn of events in my stride. But afterwards it stood out like a geeky tech journalist at a film premiere – a machine made of metal can&#8217;t transform into a human – that&#8217;s just stupid. At best, they&#8217;d be able to transform into a Terminator-like skeleton thing, not some hot young chick who tries to get into Shia LaBeouf&#8217;s pants before killing him or something. Fortunately, that sequence is over fairly quickly and the film moves on, but not before it leaves a salty flavour in the back of your throat that tastes like logic being overthrown by the allure of hot chicks and fire. </p>
<p>The film moves on with some more explosions, battles, Transformers, Megan Fox and explosions. I&#8217;m not going to spell it all out for you  here. Instead we&#8217;re going to skip forward to near the end of the movie where Bay decides to throw in a (figurative) nuked fridge. Let&#8217;s put it simply: Shia LaBeouf dies, and is then visited by a bunch of Transformer angels who tell him it&#8217;s not his time to die and bring him back to life. </p>
<p>What. The. Fuck.</p>
<p>It was literally like Michael Bay was sitting behind me in the theatre with a cold bucket of water, waiting to pour it over me at that precise moment to completely rip me from any suspension of disbelief. Transformer Angels? What the hell were they thinking? Just like in the last Indiana Jones film when Lucas nuked the fridge and Shia LaBeouf became Tarzan, you end up so shocked by the absurdity of this moment – even in a film about transforming robots – that it almost completely ruins the entire film.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s just the problem. <em>Transformers 2</em> was never going to have the strongest plot. It was never going to have the best acting performances. It was never going to have you leaving the cinema thinking &#8220;well that was an intelligent film&#8221;. What it was going to do was give you enough action and robot porn, plus a few laughs along the way, to make you forget about the world for a couple of hours. And when a single scene in a two hour movie is so bad that you actually turn to the person next to you and ask them &#8220;What the fuck&#8221;, it&#8217;s going to taint the entire movie experience.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what that one scene did for me. On the whole I managed to ignore the gaping plot holes and cliches and enjoy the robot CGI and explosive action ride. There are a couple of things – like the Matrix of leadership and the Devastator – which reminded me of the original Transformers cartoon movie and my youth playing with the toys that I thoroughly enjoyed. But even after a couple of days trying to come to terms with it, I still find myself thinking about the absurdity of Transformer angels bringing Shia back to life. I can&#8217;t help but think it would have been much better for him to just stay dead&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/transformers">Transformers on Giz</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entertainment-geekly-transformers-2-film-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Geekly: Ghostbusters on Blu-Ray!</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entertainment-geekly-ghostbusters-on-blu-ray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entertainment-geekly-ghostbusters-on-blu-ray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghostbusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=337524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next week, Ghostbusters is being released on Blu-ray. You should definitely buy it.
It&#8217;s being released to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the film, as well as tie in with the release of the new Ghostbusters video game. 
The first thing that struck me when watching the movie is just how good it looks for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/06/new-gb-bluray-3d.jpg" alt="ghostbusters bluray" title="ghostbusters bluray" class="alignright size-full wp-image-337526" />Next week, <em>Ghostbusters</em> is being released on Blu-ray. You should definitely buy it.<span id="more-337524"></span><br />
It&#8217;s being released to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the film, as well as tie in with the release of the new <em>Ghostbusters</em> video game. </p>
<p>The first thing that struck me when watching the movie is just how good it looks for a 25 year old film. I&#8217;ve watched some older films on Blu-ray before and been disappointed with the video quality, but <em>Ghostbusters</em> looks fantastic. Especially when you compare it to some of the deleted scenes which run at a VHS-like 480p. Sure, the special effects are still 80s-bad, but that&#8217;s half the allure – remember what happened when Lucas went back and tinkered with<em> Star Wars</em>?</p>
<p>The special features are fairly typical of any film these days plus some trailers for the new game, although you can select a playlist of special features to pick and choose what you want to watch. There&#8217;s also BD-Live functionality, although it offers nothing more than access to Sony&#8217;s BD-Live page, which offers trailers and asks you to suggest BD-Live features.</p>
<p>But ultimately it&#8217;s the ability to watch one of the all-time classic films in HD that makes this really appealing. Slimer never looked so good.</p>
<p>The film hits shelves June 17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/entertainment-geekly-ghostbusters-on-blu-ray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Geekly: Un-Terminating The Terminator Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_un-terminating_the_terminator_reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_un-terminating_the_terminator_reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_un-terminating_the_terminator_reviews.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After spending hours battling with the devastating reviews given to the new Terminator Salvation film, I actually went and saw the film for myself. And I&#8217;m glad I did. (Spoilers ahead!)Let me be straight up about this: if you go to see Terminator expecting to see a clever, engaging piece of art, you&#8217;re looking in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/termsalv.jpg" class="center" /><br />
After spending hours battling with the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/one_stupid_thing_out_of_the_many_stupid_things_in_emterminator_salvationem-2.html">devastating</a> <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/iterminator_salvationi_review_better_than_it3i_but_not_by_much-2.html">reviews</a> given to the new <em>Terminator Salvation</em> film, I actually went and saw the film for myself. And I&#8217;m glad I did. (Spoilers ahead!)<span id="more-336543"></span>Let me be straight up about this: if you go to see Terminator expecting to see a clever, engaging piece of art, you&#8217;re looking in the wrong place. If you&#8217;re looking for a logical movie that always makes sense, you&#8217;re looking in the wrong place. If, however, you&#8217;re after a relatively enjoyable 90 minutes or so watching robots blow shit up trying to kill humans and humans blowing shit up trying to kill robots, then this is definitely the movie for you.</p>
<p>This is Terminator. It&#8217;s not supposed to make a hell of a lot of sense. The paradoxes of time travel &#8211; which was one of the main issues in the first three films, is but a passing thought in this film. There&#8217;s no sending people (or robots) back in time to kill either Sarah or John Connor. There&#8217;s only war, and the hope of ending it, that drives this film.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; there are a lot of things in the film that seem stupid, just like <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/one_stupid_thing_out_of_the_many_stupid_things_in_emterminator_salvationem-2.html">Matt pointed out</a>. Like how the T800, instead of just killing John Connor in a one on one battle, decides to just keep trying to throw him against walls. Or the fact that the same robot can kill Marcus, a weird Terminator/human hybrid, just by punching him the heart. But that&#8217;s not the  point. In T2, why is it that even though an entire truck full of liquid nitrogen crashes into a smelting factory, nobody calls the police or fire department? In T3, the TX fricken controls regular cars via some hacking remote control system, even though that&#8217;s not possible in any kind of reality. The point is that stupid, ridiculous leaps in logic are a part of the Terminator series.</p>
<p>Truth be told, the script could have been a lot tighter. Christian Bale grew on me as John Connor, despite his gravelly Batman voice in the early part of the film. Sam Worthington did a good job &#8211; I actually wanted to see him succeed and kick even more ass than he did, and I totally believed that he was a hybrid machine who thought he was human. The film&#8217;s ending was a bit cheesy, but so&#8217;s the idea that robots can be sent back through time.</p>
<p><em>Terminator Salvation</em> isn&#8217;t going to win any Oscars. There&#8217;s no &#8216;Heath Ledger&#8217; performance that stands out as a moment of complete brilliance. But the special effects are amazing, the plot works as well as it can and the action is pretty much non stop. If you spend too much time analysing the reality of a movie so set in an unreal world, then you&#8217;re never going to enjoy the film. Which is a shame, because it <em>is</em> enjoyable.</p>
<p>And contrary to what <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/iterminator_salvationi_review_better_than_it3i_but_not_by_much-2.html">Mark said in his review</a>, it shits all over <em>T3</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_un-terminating_the_terminator_reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life-Size Bumblebee Statue At Cannes Needs A New Home In My Backyard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/life-size_bumblebee_statue_at_cannes_needs_a_new_home_in_my_backyard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/life-size_bumblebee_statue_at_cannes_needs_a_new_home_in_my_backyard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bumblebee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/life-size_bumblebee_statue_at_cannes_needs_a_new_home_in_my_backyard.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Transformers: Life-size Bumblebee, Cannes
Now that my hopes and dreams for an awesome Terminator movie have been pretty much shattered by negative reviews, I guess I have to turn my attention to the next big blockbuster on my Entertainment Geekly radar: Transformers 2. If you can tolerate the annoying music from this clip, you can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/2844361/transformers_life_size_bumblebee_cannes.swf" width="400" height="345" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"> </embed><br /><font size = 1><a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2844361/transformers_life_size_bumblebee_cannes/">Transformers: Life-size Bumblebee, Cannes</a></font><br />
Now that my hopes and dreams for an awesome Terminator movie have been pretty much shattered by negative reviews, I guess I have to turn my attention to the next big blockbuster on my <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/entertainment+geekly">Entertainment Geekly</a> radar: <em>Transformers 2</em>. If you can tolerate the annoying music from this clip, you can check out the awesome life-sized Bumblebee statue set up in Cannes for this year&#8217;s film festival.<span id="more-336275"></span>To the guys at Paramount: When you&#8217;re done with the statue in Cannes, I&#8217;ve got a great home for it here in Sydney. Call me.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a pic of the statue up close from Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ibwk/3533810843/">IBWK</a>:<br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="bumblebee statue.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/3533810843_b37e0b2917.jpg" width="500" height="333" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/life-size_bumblebee_statue_at_cannes_needs_a_new_home_in_my_backyard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pixar Talk 3D For Up In New Clip</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pixar_talk_3d_for_up_in_new_clip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pixar_talk_3d_for_up_in_new_clip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pixar_talk_3d_for_up_in_new_clip.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We&#8217;ve already seen how Dreamworks have made the concerted effort to release every animated film from Monsters vs Aliens in 3D. It&#8217;s interesting then to see that Pixar are developing a similar philosophy, starting with their upcoming release, Up.While there isn&#8217;t a lot of technical detail in the clips, getting a feeling for the various [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><object width="420" height="339"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x97o0g" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x97o0g" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="339" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></object></div>
<p>We&#8217;ve already seen how <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/entertainment_geekly_the_push_for_a_3d_cinema_revolution.html">Dreamworks have made the concerted effort</a> to release every animated film from <em>Monsters vs Aliens</em> in 3D. It&#8217;s interesting then to see that Pixar are developing a similar philosophy, starting with their upcoming release, <em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/new_pixar_up_trailer_has_me_up_too-2.html">Up</a></em>.<span id="more-335931"></span>While there isn&#8217;t a lot of technical detail in the clips, getting a feeling for the various ways that they&#8217;re planning on stretching the 3D is an interesting look at the process of 3D filmmaking, although it is a little short. Hopefully the DVD will have some kind of special feature on the process, as well as an explanation as to why some people can&#8217;t handle 3D&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/up/">Up Official Site</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/pixar_talk_3d_for_up_in_new_clip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Geekly: New Transformers Posters Show Optimus Prime Needs A New Coat Of Paint&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_new_transformers_posters_show_optimus_prime_needs_a_new_coat_of_paint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_new_transformers_posters_show_optimus_prime_needs_a_new_coat_of_paint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment geekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_new_transformers_posters_show_optimus_prime_needs_a_new_coat_of_paint.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How good do these posters for the new Transformers movie look? Seriously, Starscream looks totally badass, and Optimus Prime is in desperate need for a new coat of paint&#8230;You can click on each of the images for a larger version, if it tickles your fancy. And on a Friday afternoon, why wouldn&#8217;t it?


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/Optimus_TF2-OP-3.jpg"><img alt="Optimus_TF2-OP-3.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/assets_c/2009/05/Optimus_TF2-OP-3-thumb-500x740.jpg" width="500" height="740" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span>How good do these posters for the new Transformers movie look? Seriously, Starscream looks totally badass, and Optimus Prime is in desperate need for a new coat of paint&#8230;<span id="more-335586"></span>You can click on each of the images for a larger version, if it tickles your fancy. And on a Friday afternoon, why wouldn&#8217;t it?<br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/Starscream_TF2-SS-3.jpg"><img alt="Starscream_TF2-SS-3.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/assets_c/2009/05/Starscream_TF2-SS-3-thumb-500x740.jpg" width="500" height="740" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>
<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/Bumblebee_TF2-BB-3.jpg"><img alt="Bumblebee_TF2-BB-3.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/assets_c/2009/05/Bumblebee_TF2-BB-3-thumb-500x740.jpg" width="500" height="740" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/entertainment_geekly_new_transformers_posters_show_optimus_prime_needs_a_new_coat_of_paint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
