<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; editing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/editing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Video editing tools spotted in iPhone 3.0 firmware beta</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/video_editing_tools_spotted_in_iphone_30_firmware_beta-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/video_editing_tools_spotted_in_iphone_30_firmware_beta-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/video_editing_tools_spotted_in_iphone_30_firmware_beta-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Famous pairings include Apple pie and ice cream; Apple&#8217;s Steve and Steve; Jason Chen and pantsing new electronics; and, of course, the iPhone and video editing.


It&#8217;s just a rumour for now, bits of newly discovered beta code, really, but that last pairing could be true, and soon.
Now, video editing and the iPhone isn&#8217;t total out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/iphonehappy.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Famous pairings include Apple pie and ice cream; Apple&#8217;s Steve and Steve; Jason Chen and pantsing new electronics; and, of course, the iPhone and video editing.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor, beta, iphone, iphone 3.0, unconfirmed, video, video editing --><br />
<span id="more-333166"></span>
<p>It&#8217;s just a rumour for now, bits of newly discovered beta code, really, but that last pairing could be true, and soon.</p>
<p>Now, video editing and the iPhone isn&#8217;t total out of the blue. Just last month, in the aftermath of the big firmware 3.0 beta reveal, intrepid cyber sleuths uncovered an <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/03/18/usb-tethering-publish-video-and-find-my-iphone-found-in-os-3-0/">&#8220;upload my video&#8221;</a> option in the MobileMe section.</p>
<p>But this tip from Gizmodo reader Ben is something a bit new. Buried in the beta are some graphics that future iPhone directors might use for video editing. There are also some art resources that allegedly show scrubbing and clip features.</p>
<p>And naturally, if these features pan out, they would make massively more sense paired up with a device that has a faster processor, more storage, etc. You picking up what I&#8217;m laying down? [<a href="http://translate.google.de/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benm.at%2F%3Fp%3D5885&#038;sl=de&#038;tl=en&#038;hl=de&#038;ie=UTF-8">Benm.At</a> - <em>Thanks, Ben</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/video_editing_tools_spotted_in_iphone_30_firmware_beta-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iMovie &#8216;09 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/imovie_09_review-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/imovie_09_review-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/imovie_09_review-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the surface iMovie &#8216;09 doesn&#8217;t appear that much different than the iMovie &#8216;08 everyone complained about. But when you start digging through the software, you realise Apple actually listened to all the user complaints.


Let&#8217;s face it, iMovie &#8216;08 was a step backwards for the iMovie software, so much so that Apple even made it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rtop.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />On the surface iMovie &#8216;09 doesn&#8217;t appear that much different than the iMovie &#8216;08 everyone complained about. But when you start digging through the software, you realise Apple actually listened to all the user complaints.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: review, apple, editing, feature, hands on, ilife, ilife '09, imovie, imovie '09, software, top, video, video editing --><br />
<span id="more-324823"></span>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, iMovie &#8216;08 was a step backwards for the iMovie software, so much so that Apple even made it a point to keep iMovie &#8216;06 available as a download well after the software had been updated. The biggest complaint with iMovie &#8216;08 was it lacked all the special features found in the previous version that made video editing so fun and easy.</p>
<p>iMovie &#8216;09 has regained most of the features that were lost in the &#8216;08 version and even has some new ones like video stabilisation, green screen and animated maps. The UI still lacks a dedicated timeline that most video editors are accustomed to using, but to make up for it iMovie &#8216;09 has new tools like the precision editor and advanced drag-and-drop capabilities.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a closer look at the new features of iMovie &#8216;09:</p>
<p><strong>Precision Editor</strong><br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rpreedit.jpg" width="600" height="231" style="display:block;" /><br /> Apple&#8217;s response to all the complaints about iMovie &#8216;08 lacking a timeline is this new precision editor window. Once you&#8217;re in a project, you select precision editor in a clips pop-up window, and the bottom half of iMovie becomes the editor. This tool is intended to help make more precise edits between two clips in your project, and does this by showing the two clips in an overlapping fashion. You simply click the spot in a clip you want to cut at and than iMovie automatically moves the clip to create the cut you want.</p>
<p>The window can also display audio tracks, effects and titles along side the video clips so it feels more like a timeline than a simple project window. There is also the option to move titles and change audio tracks of clips. The problem here is that the precision editor won&#8217;t let you do precise manipulation of a music track. This is frustrating, especially when you&#8217;re trying to line your video up with music. For the simple trimming of clips precision editor works pretty well&mdash;better that than nothing&mdash;but it&#8217;s still no substitute for a timeline.</p>
<p><strong>Advanced Drag-and-Drop</strong><br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rpopup.jpg" width="249" height="283" class="right"><br /> After checking Show Advanced Tools under iMovie Preferences, this drag-and-drop tool shows much more features. In iMovie &#8216;08 dropping a clip from the library on-top of a clip in the project window simply inserts the library clip into the project. Now in iMovie &#8216;09 the same action brings up a pop-up menu filled with choices. It has options to replace the clip four different ways into your project or just to insert it the same way it would have in iMovie &#8216;08. The best features though are the Audio Only, Cutaway, Picture-in-Picture and Green Screen&mdash;all of which are completely new to iMovie &#8216;09.<br /> <br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Video Stabilisation</strong><br /> <script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("im9rstabi.flv", 475, 286); </script><br /> For the common shaky video clip using video stabilisation will impressively make the annoying camera movement disappear. iMovie &#8216;09 does this stabilisation in two steps. First it will analyse the video clip frame by frame and pixel by pixel, comparing one side of the frame to the other. Once it has analyzed the clip it applies a function that scales, rotates and moves the video based on the comparison. It zooms and trims the clip as much as it needs to apply the reverse movement of the camera shake and still not go outside the video frame. What&#8217;s more interesting is this video stabilisation is the same effect Apple uses in their professional visual effects program Shake.</p>
<p><strong>Video Effects, Themes, Titles, and Transitions</strong><br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rclipslowmo.jpg" width="300" height="249" class="right"><br /> Thank God or maybe Jobs, but video effects like speed, reverse play, and colour adjustments are all back in iMovie &#8216;09. The clip inspector window now has options for all these effects. There might not be as many effects as there were in iMovie &#8216;06 but there are some new ones, like the cool Sci-Fi and Heat Wave colour shifts.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rthemes.jpg" width="300" height="244"><br /> Themes have also returned to iMovie. There are six different themes to choose from and each one puts a visual effect on the first and last clip in the project. The first will show an intro title like a scrap book with video playing on it and at the end it will insert a directed by title over your last clip. What&#8217;s cool is it will also add theme-related transitions to the transitions selection. Same goes for the titles. You only get about four new transitions and titles, but it&#8217;s nice to keep each element of the project in theme.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rtitles.jpg" width="300" height="274" class="right"><br /> iMovie &#8216;08 only had 12 titles to choose from which was pretty pathetic, but now iMovie &#8216;09 has over 32. The titles aren&#8217;t as customisable as they were in iMovie &#8216;06 but with new additions like Clouds and Organic Main it might make up for it. As for transitions, only a few new ones have been added but nothing spectacular.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Maps and Backgrounds</strong><br /> <script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("im9rmaps.flv", 475, 286); </script><br /> The maps visual affects are pretty cool but not something that can be used with every project. There&#8217;s eight different moving maps to choose from&mdash;not just fake Indiana Jones maps but real ones that you can put your real locations on, as well as set your desired duration. When changing the destination points on a map, it conveniently pulls up a search window for city or airport, which makes finding a specific location very simple. After playing with these maps, I can say the best feature is the ability to add video effects. Since you can add the same effects to maps that you can to video clips, you can make Sci-Fi-looking worlds, like I did in the the video above.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rbackgrounds.jpg" width="300" height="271" class="right"><br /> It&#8217;s very sad that a background selection was not available in iMovie &#8216;08. Something so simple like a background is really essential to giving users the freedom to create any type of project they want. With an assortment of solid coloured and moving backgrounds, iMovie &#8216;09 now has the the option to a add a simple colour frame to the project. I for one am glad backgrounds are finally back.<br /> <br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Edit to Music</strong><br /> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/im9rcuttomusic.jpg" width="600" height="218" style="display:block;" /><br /> This is another new feature in iMovie &#8216;09 that is intended to assist at editing to music or making a music video. What this option does is allow the user to drop beat markers on a music track and then using those beat markers iMovie &#8216;09 will adjust the video clip durations to match the markers. This option will take some getting used but it seems like a valiant effort on Apple&#8217;s part to create something useful.</p>
<p>After playing around with the edit to music and green screen options I was able to create a fun little video. Before you start asking who the hell these kids are, all the sample video clips I used were provided by Apple so ask them.<br /> <script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("im9rgreenvid.flv", 475, 286); </script><br /> <br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Overall</strong><br /> Apple attempted to recreate iMovie for iLife &#8216;08, and in many people&#8217;s views, this was a massive failure. With iMovie &#8216;09, the company is really trying to make up for it&mdash;or perhaps prove that it had to tear down the previous system to make a decent new system. Most of the points that experienced enthusiasts complained about, like lack of creative features, has been addressed. But are the additions of features like video stabilisation and effects enough to make this iMovie<br />
 &#8216;09 as useful as iMovie &#8216;06 was? At this point, I still think it&#8217;s not. The new tools like precision editor and drag-and-drop are nice needed additions for the layout but a timeline is still better. Bottom line is this: If you didn&#8217;t mind the new iMovie layout but wanted more creative tools, you got them. But if the lack of a timeline layout in iMovie &#8216;08 is what got your goat, you&#8217;re probably not going to like iMovie &#8216;09 either. Sorry. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/imovie/">iMovie '09</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/imovie_09_review-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gremlins 2, Modernised by Uber Fan with Uber Props</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/gremlins_2_modernized_by_uber_fan_with_uber_props-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/gremlins_2_modernized_by_uber_fan_with_uber_props-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gremlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/gremlins_2_modernized_by_uber_fan_with_uber_props-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t rewatched it since childhood, but my vague recollections of Gremlins 2 strained through my modern brain&#8217;s taste filter bring me to the conclusion that the film might not be the Oscar-candidate I once thought. But there was one scene that was very memorable all the same. It&#8217;s when the film breaks in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="417"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/REGCV6z3VkM&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/REGCV6z3VkM&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="417"></embed></object>I haven&#8217;t rewatched it since childhood, but my vague recollections of Gremlins 2 strained through my modern brain&#8217;s taste filter bring me to the conclusion that the film might not be the Oscar-candidate I once thought. But there was one scene that was very memorable all the same. It&#8217;s when the film breaks in the middle of the movie and gremlins take over the projection booth (where they injected themselves into various films). On VHS, the sequence was altered as a tape breaking with a similar outcome. Now, one highly talented fan updated the whole sequence for today&#8217;s VOD technology with completely new clips. It&#8217;s not just some fanboy creation; this is the work of a very talented special effects professional. And once you watch that first clip, the making of is even better:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: movies, editing, film, gremlins 2, gremlins 2: the new batch --><br />
<span id="more-304392"></span>
<p><object width="494" height="417"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mDvBVFv-7LM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mDvBVFv-7LM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="417"></embed></object>The sequence was assembled by one guy who operated each puppet by hand and completed the project for US$3,000. But&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t a YouTube version have been more fitting? [via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/09/02/gremlins-2-film-brea.html">bbGadgets</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/gremlins_2_modernized_by_uber_fan_with_uber_props-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographs Enhance Video in Absolutely Unbelievable Ways</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/photographs_enhance_video_in_absolutely_unbelievable_ways-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/photographs_enhance_video_in_absolutely_unbelievable_ways-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/photographs_enhance_video_in_absolutely_unbelievable_ways-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Gizmodo, I worked in the bowels of the broadcast industry for a number of years. I was either shooting video or cutting video every day, all day. And while Final Cut Pro and Adobe After Effects were both tools I used with some proficiency on a daily basis, I&#8217;ve never seen a post production [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/videodemoin.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />Before Gizmodo, I worked in the bowels of the broadcast industry for a number of years. I was either shooting video or cutting video every day, all day. And while Final Cut Pro and Adobe After Effects were both tools I used with some proficiency on a daily basis, I&#8217;ve never seen a post production demo as incredible as this clip from the University of Washington.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital imaging, bigpic=true --><br />
<span id="more-302318"></span>
<p>Essentially, you shoot some crappy, low-rez video of a still scene. You then reshoot the same scene with a digital camera (with higher resolution). Software can automagically combine these images to upconvert the video AND fix problems in the image&#8211; all while compensating for 3D space. Make sense? The remarkable demo will clarify things a bit:</p>
<p><object width="494" height="329"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1513129&#038;server=www.vimeo.com&#038;show_title=1&#038;show_byline=1&#038;show_portrait=0&#038;color=00ADEF&#038;fullscreen=1"><embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1513129&#038;server=www.vimeo.com&#038;show_title=1&#038;show_byline=1&#038;show_portrait=0&#038;color=00ADEF&#038;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="494" height="329"></object>What&#8217;s especially notable is that the software can fill in the nasty bits of the scene despite the videographer/photographer rotating their view (you see this as they shoot around the tree) and despite any lens differences (the software can compensate for different lens sizes/distortions).</p>
<p>Also, note that many details from the source video are retained (the glass reflections in the statue shot may be the best example), which means that the photograph&#8217;s information isn&#8217;t the only information we see in the composite image.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite convinced that the entire process is quite as automatic as the students would make it, but the technology is extremely promising all the same. And at this point, it should only be a matter of time before we see the idea work its way into our favourite post production products. [<a href="http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/videoenhancement/videoEnhancement.htm">Project Page</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/08/18/amazing-tech-enhance.html">bbGadgets</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/photographs_enhance_video_in_absolutely_unbelievable_ways-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Direct Note Access is Photoshop For Music</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/amazing_direct_note_access_is_photoshop_for_music-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/amazing_direct_note_access_is_photoshop_for_music-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/amazing_direct_note_access_is_photoshop_for_music-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie over at DVICE is a musician, so if he says this Direct Note Access is miraculous, we definitely believe him. Think of this software suite as Photoshop, but for music&#8212;able to change any note to any other note even if it&#8217;s buried inside chords or other instruments playing simultaneously. Up until now, you could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="413"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jFCjv4_jqAY&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jFCjv4_jqAY&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="494" height="413"></embed></object>Charlie over at DVICE is a musician, so if he says this Direct Note Access is miraculous, we definitely believe him. Think of this software suite as Photoshop, but for music&mdash;able to change any note to any other note even if it&#8217;s buried inside chords or other instruments playing simultaneously. Up until now, you could only change the entire chord, not individual notes, which would affect the general feel of the tune. But as you can see above in the video, DNA gives people much more control. [<a href="http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna">Celemony</a> via <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/20606/?nlid=1007&#038;a=f">Technology Review</a> via <a href="http://www.thedailyswarm.com/swarm/direct-note-access-dissects-musics-dna-get-ready-auto-tune-everything/">Daily Swarm</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2008/04/miraculous_dire.php">DVICE</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: direct note access, dna, editing, music, music editing, musicians, photoshop --><br />
<span id="more-285690"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/amazing_direct_note_access_is_photoshop_for_music-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s about time I introduce myself&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/its_about_time_i_introduce_myself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/its_about_time_i_introduce_myself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/its_about_time_i_introduce_myself.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, it&#8217;s been four days since I started here at Giz, and I&#8217;ve been so busy trying to get myself sorted out that I&#8217;ve overlooked introducing myself. Well no more! 
The name&#8217;s Nick Broughall. Some of you might recognise that byline if you&#8217;re a reader of Australian T3 magazine — I was editor there for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="nick copy.jpg" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/images/2008/01/nick%20copy.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="274" width="364" /></span>So, it&#8217;s been four days since I started here at Giz, and I&#8217;ve been so busy trying to get myself sorted out that I&#8217;ve overlooked introducing myself. Well no more! </p>
<p>The name&#8217;s Nick Broughall. Some of you might recognise that byline if you&#8217;re a reader of <i>Australian T3 magazine</i> — I was editor there for the past 18 months, reviews editor before that and staff writer before that. I&#8217;ve also done a spot of tech freelancing around the place. Think <i>Rolling Stone, OPSM, Paperplane</i>, and probably a few others I&#8217;ve forgotten about and you&#8217;ll get the idea.</p>
<p>So why should you care? Well, I know you lot are a pretty dedicated lot. You love gadgets as much as me. You hate missing out on the latest product just because you&#8217;re Australian too. My aim is to give you all the best local gadget info, plus keep you informed of all the overseas goings on. </p>
<p>I also want to build the Australian Giz community&#8230; some of you guys are awesome commenters (applause). But there&#8217;s more of you lurking in the corners, maybe to shy to make your opinions heard. Well I want to hear them. In the coming weeks, look out for some great competitions for commenters, plus I also have a few ideas for&nbsp; some Giz-reader get-togethers. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be an awesome ride.  Feel free to tell me what you like about the site, what you don&#8217;t like, tips, tricks, ideas, or if you simply want to send me money. I&#8217;m all for receiving anonymous cheques, by the way.<br /> <span id="more-274799"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/its_about_time_i_introduce_myself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackmagic Intensity Pro Makes HDTV Editing Easier</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/blackmagic_intensity_pro_makes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/blackmagic_intensity_pro_makes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackmagic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/blackmagic_intensity_pro_makes.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blackmagic Design is now shipping Intensity Pro, a $349 PCI Express card you can install in a Mac or a PC that lets you capture uncompressed HD video via an HDMI port, and then view that video as you edit by plugging in an HDMI-equipped HDTV set.
The Intensity Pro also lets you capture and play [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="blackmagic_intensity_pro.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/blackmagic_intensity_pro.jpg" width="520" height="152" class="center" />Blackmagic Design is now shipping Intensity Pro, a $349 PCI Express card you can install in a Mac or a PC that lets you capture uncompressed HD video via an HDMI port, and then view that video as you edit by plugging in an HDMI-equipped HDTV set.</p>
<p>The Intensity Pro also lets you capture and play back any analog source using S-Video, or component connections. If you don&#8217;t need that analog capability, for $249 you can just get the previously available Intensity card that handles HDMI only. HDTV shooters and editors, consumer and pro, are going to love this.</p>
<blockquote class="au"><p>AU: FYI, the awesomeness of Blackmagic Design comes straight outta Melbourne.  <strike>We&#8217;re chasing up local pricing.</strike> Word is the local price is $415 for the Intensity and $565 for the Intensity Pro (from <a href="http://www.newmagic.com.au/">New Magic Australia</a>).</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-247202"></span>Many of the latest consumer-grade HD camcorders have HDMI ports, and they&#8217;re able to send their uncompressed video images directly out that HDMI port and into an Intensity card installed in your Mac or PC, bypassing the HDV compression that&#8217;s necessary to lay it down on tape. This way, you get mainline 1920 HDTV video straight from the camera&#8217;s imaging chips.</p>
<p>Of course, you&#8217;ll need to have a desktop Mac or PC nearby when you&#8217;re shooting this video, a cumbersome prospect for on-location shooting but perfectly suitable for studio work. Once your footage is captured, you&#8217;ll end up with some huge files on your hard disc, but Blackmagic also includes its own compression technology, if you choose to make those files smaller and easier to edit, too.</p>
<p>Either one of these cards could also  be extremely useful when you want to view your footage on a television set while you&#8217;re editing HD footage. This is really hard to do in real time using HDV camcorders, whose video can&#8217;t looped through in real time as you can do with standard-def DV camcorders. Using Intensity&#8217;s HDMI output, you simply plug in an HDTV set and then you can see all your video in real time as you edit, even effects that usually need to be rendered if you want to see them on an external monitor. The Intensity Pro&#8217;s analog outputs can also send video to an S-Video or component monitor in the same way.</p>
<p>What a neat idea, solving  a few of the pesky problems of shooting and editing HDV with one card and a few connectors. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/intensity/">Product Page</a>  [Blackmagic Design, via <a href="http://www.biosmagazine.co.uk/article.php?id=5139">Bios Magazine</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/06/blackmagic_intensity_pro_makes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ulead VideoStudio 11: Another to edit AVCHD Format</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/ulead_videostudio_11_software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/ulead_videostudio_11_software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avchd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ulead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/ulead_videostudio_11_software.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve heard a lot of complaining about the paucity of editing tools for the nascent AVCHD video format, and now Ulead VideoStudio 11 Plus comes along with that capability and a lot more. With AVCHD originator Panasonic&#8217;s latest solid-state camcorders using the format, and Sony rocking more cameras using it just the other day, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/vs_11_graphic.jpg" alt="vs_11_graphic.jpg" mce_src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/vs_11_graphic.jpg" class="left" height="105" width="231">We&#8217;ve heard a lot of complaining about the paucity of editing tools for the nascent AVCHD video format, and now Ulead VideoStudio 11 Plus comes along with that capability and a lot more. With AVCHD originator <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/panasonic-announces-true-1080i-hd-camcorders-and-theyre-cheap-too-249222.php" mce_href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/panasonic-announces-true-1080i-hd-camcorders-and-theyre-cheap-too-249222.php">Panasonic&#8217;s latest solid-state camcorders</a> using the format, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/sonys-hd-camcorders-rock-the-high-def-one-solid-state-two-with-a-hard-disk-255221.php" mce_href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/sonys-hd-camcorders-rock-the-high-def-one-solid-state-two-with-a-hard-disk-255221.php">Sony rocking more cameras using it</a> just the other day, the ability to edit that footage is long overdue.</p>
<p>Hey, that format&#8217;s fo&#8217; reals, and is here to stay, right? Yep. Well, what else can Ulead VideoStudio 11 do?</p>
<p><span id="more-245970"></span>
<p>Also along for the ride with this latest version is Windows Vista compatibility, an MPEG Optimizer that helps you get the most out of video compression, and Ulead&#8217;s wizard-based interface that makes it easy to accomplish complex tasks. And the Plus version also lets you author HD DVDs if you have such a burner. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve used previous versions of Ulead VideoStudio, and found the software to be a good value. It&#8217;s a whole lot more stable than its Pinnacle Studio rival, which was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/pinnacle-studio-11-video-editing-software-announced-in-three-flavors-255144.php" mce_href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/pinnacle-studio-11-video-editing-software-announced-in-three-flavors-255144.php">also recently updated</a>. VideoStudio is priced right at $70 for the standard version (no AVCHD editing capability) and $100 for the Plus version, and both ship sometime in May. <span class="byline">â€“ Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ulead.com/vs/runme.htm" mce_href="http://www.ulead.com/vs/runme.htm">Product Page</a> [Ulead]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/05/ulead_videostudio_11_software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AVCHD editing! FINALLY!</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/avchd_editing_finally_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/avchd_editing_finally_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avchd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/avchd_editing_finally_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve liked the idea of AVCHD video, but the fact that nothing to date has been able to edit the footage &#8212; even Sony&#8217;s own Vegas 7 &#8212; has been plain ridiculous. Sony has promised &#8220;coming soon&#8221; since their cameras launched back in November, but now, six months later, we finally get the news we&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2007/04/26/vegasdvd7.jpg" alt="vegasdvd7.jpg" mce_src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/2007/04/26/vegasdvd7.jpg" class="left" height="227" width="213">I&#8217;ve liked the idea of AVCHD video, but the fact that nothing to date has been able to edit the footage &#8212; even Sony&#8217;s own Vegas 7 &#8212; has been plain ridiculous. Sony has promised &#8220;coming soon&#8221; since their cameras launched back in November, but now, six months later, we finally get the news we&#8217;ve been waiting for.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/products/product.asp?PID=404" mce_href="http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/products/product.asp?PID=404">Vegas 7 Professional</a> will have a free update, downloadable from May 1. Huzzah! Users of the consumer Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 8 will get their update in July. Ouch, but at least you&#8217;ve finally got a date.</p>
<p>It is native editing too, not transcoded to an intermediate codec, so you won&#8217;t be getting any generational loss. No decision yet on recommended spec, but it will have to be more than general Vegas use because real-time editing AVCHD is going to cane your CPU. We&#8217;ve been told:</p>
<blockquote><p>It does not do too bad on a Duo CPU!  Sony CS have come up with a faster way of editing naively that&#8217;s all I can tell you&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume that&#8217;s &#8216;natively&#8217;&#8230; I don&#8217;t want to call them naive about this just yet. Zing!! <span class="byline">-Seamus Byrne</span></p>
<p><span id="more-245796"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/avchd_editing_finally_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pinnacle Studio 11 Video Editing Software Announced in Three Flavors</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/pinnacle_studio_11_video_editi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/pinnacle_studio_11_video_editi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pinnacle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/pinnacle_studio_11_video_editi.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Avid Technology announced the latest version of its wildly popular consumer video editing software package, Pinnacle Studio 11, set to ship next month. Now the software is offered in Basic, Plus, and Ultimate versions. 
If you don&#8217;t need to edit HD, the Basic version for $49 will probably do everything you need. Bump up to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/pinnacle_studio11.jpg" alt="pinnacle_studio11.jpg" mce_src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/pinnacle_studio11.jpg" class="center" height="260" width="500"></p>
<p>Avid Technology announced the latest version of its wildly popular consumer video editing software package, Pinnacle Studio 11, set to ship next month. Now the software is offered in Basic, Plus, and Ultimate versions. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t need to edit HD, the Basic version for $49 will probably do everything you need. Bump up to the $99 Plus version and you can edit HD videos and also burn HD DVDs. Another 30 bucks gives you Pinnacle Studio Ultimate, unlocking chromakey and film-look effects, panning and zooming tools and a few audio tweaking toys. </p>
<p><i>Sounds </i>good, but the previous version of this software sucked. Find out more:</p>
<p><span id="more-245765"></span>
<p>This used to be the most popular video editing software in the world for good reasonâ€”it&#8217;s traditionally been easy to use and well-priced. Let&#8217;s hope Avid has fixed the <a href="http://avid.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=37763" mce_href="http://avid.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=37763">disastrous problems</a> with its crash-prone and balky-to-install versions 10.0 and 10.5 of Pinnacle Studio, which almost sunk the entire franchise. </p>
<p>Beyond that, we wish the company would just release one version of Studio with all the features intact, rather than crippling it two different ways and confusing the issue with all these various versions. Even so, Pinnacle Studio is a great value if you don&#8217;t feel like spending five times more for Apple Final Cut Pro or Adobe Premiere Pro. <span class="byline">â€“ Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/us/Products/Consumer+Products/Home+Video/Studio+Family/Studio+Feature.htm" mce_href="http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/us/Products/Consumer+Products/Home+Video/Studio+Family/Studio+Feature.htm">Product Page</a> [Avid Technology]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/04/pinnacle_studio_11_video_editi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
