<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; dtv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/dtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>America Finally Has A Mobile DTV Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/america-finally-has-a-mobile-dtv-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/america-finally-has-a-mobile-dtv-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After plenty of half-hearted attempts at mobile video from wireless carriers and Qualcomm, the ATSC has defined a standard that should, at long last, bring live streaming video to our phones. About time we got a DMB equivalent.
Keep in mind we&#8217;re not talking about the likes of VCast or the like. This is the real [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Sharp-923SH.jpg" alt="" class="left" />After plenty of half-hearted attempts at mobile video from wireless carriers and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomm-flo-tv-ptv-hands-on-us250-to-shut-up-the-kids/">Qualcomm</a>, the ATSC has defined a standard that should, at long last, bring live streaming video to our phones. About time we got a DMB equivalent.<span id="more-360837"></span></p>
<p>Keep in mind we&#8217;re not talking about the likes of VCast or the like. This is the real deal, live streaming TV straight from the networks to mobile devices. That could mean live sports, live sitcoms, live whatever-you-can-think-of TV on your phone.</p>
<p>Hopefully the mobile DVR apps will follow. [<a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/10/prweb3043494.htm">Press Release</a> via <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/10/16/mobile-digital-tv-standard-adopted-in-the-u-s-of-a/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/america-finally-has-a-mobile-dtv-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Man Is Extremely Dedicated To Live Network Television</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/this-man-is-extremely-dedicated-to-live-network-television/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/this-man-is-extremely-dedicated-to-live-network-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b&w]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white tv starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This intriguing dude is watching a black-and-white TV, with a DTV converter box, in a Starbucks. Hey, it&#8217;s not his fault Hulu doesn&#8217;t carry Jeopardy!, right? [Kansas City Blog via Boing Boing Gadgets]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_6a00d83451b1b869e20115720f12d3970b-500wi.jpg" alt="" class="center" />This intriguing dude is watching a black-and-white TV, with a DTV converter box, in a Starbucks. Hey, it&#8217;s not his fault Hulu doesn&#8217;t carry <em>Jeopardy!</em>, right? [<a href="http://blogs.kansascity.com/tvbarn/2009/07/sbux-bwtv.html">Kansas City Blog</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/16/dude-in-sbux-watchin.html">Boing Boing Gadgets</a>]<span id="more-341834"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/this-man-is-extremely-dedicated-to-live-network-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Famous Old Person Helps Other Old People Understand This Digital Television Contraption</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/famous_old_person_helps_other_old_people_understand_this_digital_television_contraption-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/famous_old_person_helps_other_old_people_understand_this_digital_television_contraption-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elderly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/famous_old_person_helps_other_old_people_understand_this_digital_television_contraption-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there anything Official DTV Spokesperson Carol Brady can&#8217;t do?


Hard as it may be to believe for nerds like you and me, there are some people who just can&#8217;t wrap their heads around this whole DTV mess. Those people&#8230;are old. And they need someone nonthreatening and of comparable age to explain the process in plain, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/ScreenHunter_02_May._09_16.30.jpg" alt="" />Is there anything Official DTV Spokesperson Carol Brady can&#8217;t do?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: the elderly, carol brady, dtv, dtv florence henderson, old people, the brady bunch --><br />
<span id="more-335640"></span>
<p>Hard as it may be to believe for nerds like you and me, there are some people who just can&#8217;t wrap their heads around this whole DTV mess. Those people&#8230;are old. And they need someone nonthreatening and of comparable age to explain the process in plain, large-print words. Preferably with pretty colours. Florence Henderson, better known as Carol Brady, has stepped up to what we&#8217;re sure is a thankless job. You can download the explanatory PDF <a href="http://www.digitaltips.org/docs/FlosTips.pdf">here</a> if you&#8217;re so inclined. [<a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2009/05/dtv-tips-from-the-ultimate-tv-mom.html?EXTKEY=I91ECON&#038;CMP=OTC-ConsumeristLinks">Consumer Reports</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/famous_old_person_helps_other_old_people_understand_this_digital_television_contraption-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Price is Right Will Lose 3.5M Viewers Come DTV Switch</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_price_is_right_will_lose_35m_viewers_come_dtv_switch-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_price_is_right_will_lose_35m_viewers_come_dtv_switch-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_price_is_right_will_lose_35m_viewers_come_dtv_switch-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of the 300 million Americans in the United states, 3.5 million are still not ready for the DTV switch come June 12. Is that 3.5 million people or households? Either way, 3.5 million is quite a lot, considering my non-english speaking nanny is already all over her digital converter. Get with it, people. [Switched]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/dtv-transition_01_01.jpg" alt="" />Out of the 300 million Americans in the United states, 3.5 million are still not ready for the DTV switch come June 12. Is that 3.5 million people or households? Either way, 3.5 million is quite a lot, considering my non-english speaking nanny is already all over her digital converter. Get with it, people. [<a href="http://www.switched.com/2009/05/04/3-5m-americans-still-unprepared-for-dtv-switch/">Switched</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: dtv, analog television, analog tv, digital conversion, digital television, digital tv, tv --><br />
<span id="more-335378"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_price_is_right_will_lose_35m_viewers_come_dtv_switch-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Government is NOT Spying on You Through Your DTV Converter Box</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/the_government_is_not_spying_on_you_through_your_dtv_converter_box-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/the_government_is_not_spying_on_you_through_your_dtv_converter_box-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pranks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set-top box]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/the_government_is_not_spying_on_you_through_your_dtv_converter_box-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Spokane-based engineer Adam Chronister posted a Youtube video, where he cracked open a government-subsidised DTV converter box, only to find a hidden camera. Turns out, the whole thing was a hoax.


Threat Level says that conspiracy theorists jumped all over the video, which racked up 200,000 views since going up. However, Chronister simply used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/dtv_cam_hoax_2.jpg" alt="" />Last week, Spokane-based engineer Adam Chronister posted a Youtube video, where he cracked open a government-subsidised DTV converter box, only to find a hidden camera. Turns out, the whole thing was a hoax.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: dtv hoax, dtv, dtv box, dtv converter box, dtv converter box camera, hoaxes, pranks --><br />
<span id="more-328489"></span>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/02/dtv-converters.html">Threat Level</a> says that conspiracy theorists jumped all over the video, which racked up 200,000 views since going up. However, Chronister simply used old mobile phone parts and a hot glue gun to push the paranoid and mentally unstable into a state of crisis. However, these tin foil heads aren&#8217;t resting any easier: they believe pranks like this only create a smoke screen for the government to carry on with their clandestine activity. Who am I to say they&#8217;re wrong? (Original video below) [<a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/02/dtv-converters.html">Threat Level</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/02/24/hidden-government-ca.html">BBG</a>]</p>
<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TQ4iIM8Eljc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TQ4iIM8Eljc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/the_government_is_not_spying_on_you_through_your_dtv_converter_box-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>70-Year Old Man Shoots TV, Engages in Standoff With Police Over DTV Transition</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/70year_old_man_shoots_tv_engages_in_standoff_with_police_over_dtv_transition-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/70year_old_man_shoots_tv_engages_in_standoff_with_police_over_dtv_transition-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/70year_old_man_shoots_tv_engages_in_standoff_with_police_over_dtv_transition-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angered and distraught over the analogue TV shutdown, a 70-year old Missouri man blew away his TV and engaged in a brief standoff with police when he could not get his converter box to work.


Surprised? You shouldn&#8217;t be. Violence like this was inevitable. All it takes is mixing one part old man with one part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/tv-crosshairs.jpg" alt="" />Angered and distraught over the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/dtv" />analogue TV shutdown</a>, a 70-year old Missouri man blew away his TV and engaged in a brief standoff with police when he could not get his converter box to work.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: dtv transition, analog shutdown, dtv, missouri, police, shooting, shooting tv, standoff, top --><br />
<span id="more-327973"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/tv-tantrum.jpg" alt="" />Surprised? You shouldn&#8217;t be. Violence like this was inevitable. All it takes is mixing one part old man with one part technology, one part handgun and two parts alcohol. Then shake vigorously with an <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/screw_june_12_40_percent_of_tv_stations_will_abandon_analogue_next_week_anyway-2.html">absence of <em>Wheel of Fortune</em></a>. [<a href="http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=167900&#038;catid=3">KSDK</a> and <a href="http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=539986">Kare 11</a> via <a href="http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=4222829">Fark</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/70year_old_man_shoots_tv_engages_in_standoff_with_police_over_dtv_transition-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Wave of the Digital TV Switch Hits Today</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/first_wave_of_the_digital_tv_switch_hits_today-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/first_wave_of_the_digital_tv_switch_hits_today-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/first_wave_of_the_digital_tv_switch_hits_today-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the end of today&#8212;the original, pre-delay shutoff deadline&#8212;641 TV (mostly small-market) stations across the country will cease analogue broadcast. Panic! [Yahoo]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/screaming-old-man.jpg" alt="" />By the end of today&mdash;the original, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/obama_wants_to_delay_analogue_tv_shutdown_to_june_12-2.html">pre-delay</a> shutoff deadline&mdash;641 TV (mostly small-market) stations across the country will cease analogue broadcast. Panic! [<a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090217/ap_on_hi_te/tec_digital_tv_transition">Yahoo</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital switchover, analog tv, broadcasting, digital tv, fcc, television, test, tv --><br />
<span id="more-327429"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/first_wave_of_the_digital_tv_switch_hits_today-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTV Reception Maps Conveniently Show Colour-Coded Signal Quality</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/dtv_reception_maps_conveniently_show_colorcoded_signal_quality-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/dtv_reception_maps_conveniently_show_colorcoded_signal_quality-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/dtv_reception_maps_conveniently_show_colorcoded_signal_quality-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve been wondering whether you&#8217;ll be able to receive strong DTV signals on your old TV, the FCC has thoughtfully created a site to help you out.


You enter in your address, and the site gives a list of the digital signals that you should be able to pull in, helpfully color-coded in green (green [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/70s_tv_with_rabbit_ears_6.jpg" alt="" />If you&#8217;ve been wondering whether you&#8217;ll be able to receive strong DTV signals on your old TV, the FCC has thoughtfully created a site to help you out.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: dtv, reception, signal, strength --><br />
<span id="more-327153"></span>
<p>You enter in your address, and the site gives a list of the digital signals that you should be able to pull in, helpfully color-coded in green (green means good!), yellow (yellow is like a crappier version of green!), orange (orange isn&#8217;t on streetlights so who knows!), and red (booooooo red!). Since I probably live out in the furthest fringes of civilization of the entire Giz staff, I entered in my own Southeast Pennsylvania address, and was pretty impressed with the results.</p>
<p>The channels in green, the strongest signals, are the only channels I can remember being able to pick up with those old rabbit ears. I didn&#8217;t even know there was a possibility to get all that other stuff. So it&#8217;s looking like DTV might be a good idea after all, provided the chart is accurate. [<a href="http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/">FCC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/dtv_reception_maps_conveniently_show_colorcoded_signal_quality-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channel 9 Not Launching Second SD Channel Until July</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/channel_9_not_launching_second_sd_channel_until_july/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/channel_9_not_launching_second_sd_channel_until_july/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multichannel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/channel_9_not_launching_second_sd_channel_until_july.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just don&#8217;t get it. For years and years, the free-to-air networks argued that it wasn&#8217;t free EPG information or decent programming that would drive people to digital TV, it was the ability to multi-channel. Yet here we are in February 2009, the networks have been legally able to launch a second digital channel since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Thumbnail image for freeview channels.png" src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/mt/assets_c/2009/01/freeview channels-thumb-535x358.png" width="535" height="358" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span>I just don&#8217;t get it. For years and years, the free-to-air networks argued that it wasn&#8217;t free EPG information or decent programming that would drive people to digital TV, it was the ability to multi-channel. Yet here we are in February 2009, the networks have been legally able to launch a second digital channel since January 1, and Channel 9 announces that they <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/where_are_our_extra_fta_digital_channels.html">won&#8217;t be joining the multi-channel party</a> until <em>July</em> because they need to upgrade their digital equipment.<span id="more-326579"></span>Considering <em>we&#8217;ve</em> known for a good long while that multi-channeling would be possible from January 1, it&#8217;s hard to understand why all the hardware wasn&#8217;t sorted out last year. Plus, the other victim of this announcement is sure to be <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/freeview_australia_yes_this_is_a_confusing_clusterfk.html">Freeview</a>, who&#8217;s claims of 15 channels are looking shakier by the day.</p>
<p>And to think, we actually <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/channel_9_letting_you_download_underbelly_for_free.html">applauded Channel 9</a> this morning for actually doing something positive for its audience. Looks like we spoke a bit too soon (like five months too soon)&#8230;</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2009/02/10/nine_delays_extra_digital_channel_until_july.html">Lifehacker AU</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/channel_9_not_launching_second_sd_channel_until_july/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screw June 12: 40 Percent of TV Stations Will Abandon Analogue Next Week Anyway</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/screw_june_12_40_percent_of_tv_stations_will_abandon_analogue_next_week_anyway-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/screw_june_12_40_percent_of_tv_stations_will_abandon_analogue_next_week_anyway-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switchover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/screw_june_12_40_percent_of_tv_stations_will_abandon_analogue_next_week_anyway-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though the mandatory switchover date from analogue to digital will be June 12 soon, about 681 (or 40 percent of) television stations will stop broadcasting analogue by the end of next week.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/dtv-transition_01_01.jpg" alt="" />Even though the mandatory switchover date from analogue to digital <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/digital_tv_change_over_date_moved_to_june_12-2.html">will be June 12 soon</a>, about 681 (or 40 percent of) television stations will stop broadcasting analogue by the end of next week.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: dtv, analog, digital switchover, digital television analog, digital tv switchover, television" --><br />
<span id="more-326584"></span>
<p>Yup, everything&#8217;s going to plan. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5197TZ20090211">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/screw_june_12_40_percent_of_tv_stations_will_abandon_analogue_next_week_anyway-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
