<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conde Nast Closes Four Magazines, Focusing On Digital Distribution</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/conde-nast-closes-four-magazines-focusing-on-digital-distribution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/conde-nast-closes-four-magazines-focusing-on-digital-distribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=358407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally the closure of two bridal magazines, a dining magazine and a mum magazine wouldn&#8217;t be notable; except that this time their publisher, Conde Nast, notes that they&#8217;re going to focus on digital distribution instead.
The important part of the internal memo is here:
In the coming weeks, we hope to announce initiatives to develop digital versions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally the closure of two bridal magazines, a dining magazine and a mum magazine wouldn&#8217;t be notable; except that this time their publisher, Conde Nast, notes that they&#8217;re going to focus on digital distribution instead.<span id="more-358407"></span></p>
<p>The important part of the <a href="http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/the-wrath-of-mckinsey-conde-nast-to-fold-gourmet-three-others/">internal memo</a> is here:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the coming weeks, we hope to announce initiatives to develop digital versions of our brands that will make use of new devices and distribution channels.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> New devices makes it seem like it&#8217;s not just moving those four publications online &mdash; a move that would have succeeded already if just going online would save magazines. It&#8217;s that new devices bit that&#8217;s intriguing. [<a href="http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/the-wrath-of-mckinsey-conde-nast-to-fold-gourmet-three-others/">Defamer</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/conde-nast-closes-four-magazines-focusing-on-digital-distribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mini DisplayPort To HDMI Adaptor Now Has Digital Audio</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adaptor-now-has-digital-audio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adaptor-now-has-digital-audio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displayport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USB audio version of the Mini DisplayPort to HDMI adaptor hasn&#8217;t shipped yet, but Kanex just came out with an even more updated version of it with digital audio.
There isn&#8217;t a whole lot to explain, other than the fact that the adaptor is now basically set to deliver full audio quality to the video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/MDPTOSHDMI.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_MDPTOSHDMI.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/kanex-mini-displayport-adapter-with-audio-review-someone-finally-gets-it-right/">USB audio version of the Mini DisplayPort to HDMI adaptor</a> hasn&#8217;t shipped yet, but Kanex just came out with an even more updated version of it with digital audio.<span id="more-357678"></span></p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t a whole lot to explain, other than the fact that the adaptor is now basically set to deliver full audio quality to the video content played back on your Mac, and all through one HDMI cable. The previous version was held up because of manufacturing issues, so we&#8217;ll have to see if this version suffers from the same difficulties. [<a href="http://www.kanexlive.com/products/item.aspx?id=3495">Kanex</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adaptor-now-has-digital-audio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ultimate Peeping Tom Device Disguises Itself As Digital Camera, Media Player</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/ultimate-peeping-tom-device-disguises-itself-as-digital-camera-media-player/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/ultimate-peeping-tom-device-disguises-itself-as-digital-camera-media-player/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar digital binocular sports and spy camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[21-friggin&#8217;-times optical zoom, MPEG4 video recording, digital camera, night mode, and digital music player to play the James Bond theme on repeat. That&#8217;s what the Avatar Digital Binocular Sports and Spy Camera will get you for just $US129.
The Avatar Digital Binocular Sports and Spy Camera has a 2.5 LCD screen, USB connectivity, video out, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_CVSD-DC06-7.jpg" alt="" class="left" />21-friggin&#8217;-times optical zoom, MPEG4 video recording, digital camera, night mode, and digital music player to play the James Bond theme on repeat. That&#8217;s what the Avatar Digital Binocular Sports and Spy Camera will get you for just $US129.<span id="more-342431"></span></p>
<p>The Avatar Digital Binocular Sports and Spy Camera has a 2.5 LCD screen, USB connectivity, video out, and up to 3GB of memory using a 2GB memory card. It suppors the usual video and audio playing formats, recording at 25fps in 640 x 480 mode. [<a href="http://www.chinavasion.com/product_info.php/pName/avatar-digital-binocular-sports-and-spy-camera-great-40x-zoom/">Chinavision</a> via <a href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=15299">Red Ferret</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_chinavasion-CVSD-DC06-7.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_chinavasion-CVSD-DC06-9.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_chinavasion-CVSD-DC06-13.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_chinavasion-CVSD-DC06-4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_chinavasion-CVSD-DC06-10.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/ultimate-peeping-tom-device-disguises-itself-as-digital-camera-media-player/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Amazon&#8217;s Power To Delete Books Is Absolutely Horrifying</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/why-amazons-power-to-delete-books-is-absolutely-horrifying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/why-amazons-power-to-delete-books-is-absolutely-horrifying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors from Columbia&#8217;s Science and Technology Law Review explained to us a year ago the pitfalls of not owning your Kindle books, a fact that Amazon revealed to be more horrifying than we thought. Guess what? It&#8217;s worse.
Slate&#8217;s Farhad Manjoo points out more reasons (bothered from Harvard law professor Jonathan Zittrain) why we should be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/kindlefinger.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Editors from Columbia&#8217;s Science and Technology Law Review <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/amazon_kindle_and_sony_reader_locked_up_why_your_books_are_no_longer_yours-2/">explained to us</a> a year ago the pitfalls of not owning your Kindle books, a fact that Amazon revealed to be more <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/amazon-remotely-deletes-legitimately-purchased-books-from-thousands-of-kindles/">horrifying than we thought</a>. Guess what? <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2223214/pagenum/all/#p2">It&#8217;s worse</a>.<span id="more-342362"></span></p>
<p><em>Slate</em>&#8217;s Farhad Manjoo <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2223214/pagenum/all/#p2">points out</a> more reasons (bothered from Harvard law professor Jonathan Zittrain) why we should be absolutely terrified of &#8220;tethered&#8221; devices like the Kindle, especially if we&#8217;re headed toward a truly paperless and discless future, where books, movies and music are all downloaded. Imagine if there were no paper copies of <em>1984</em>, and Amazon&mdash;or whatever company wins the ereader war&mdash;deleted it. Or any other book or film that&#8217;s been banned at one point. It&#8217;s much easier, after all, to delete them off of a million devices than to actually pull one thousand paper copies out of people&#8217;s houses. A possibility that&#8217;s more, uh, possible <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/21/science/21crypto.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">with breakthroughs like self-destructing data</a>. (One more reason we&#8217;ll always need something like BitTorent, more than ever in the future, not less.)</p>
<p>If hypotheticals aren&#8217;t your thing, take the 2004 TiVo vs. Echostar <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/tivo_defeats_echostar_for_stealing_dvr_patent_in_epic_court_battle_once_and_for_all-2/">patent infringement case</a>. When TiVo won, the judge ruled that Dish didn&#8217;t just have to stop selling infringing DVR boxes, they had to actually remotely kill the boxes they&#8217;d already sold. Boxes they had installed in people&#8217;s houses.</p>
<p>Granted, Jonathan Zittrain is the same crazy guy who <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/the_iphone_is_killing_the_internet-2/">says that the iPhone is killing the internet</a>, but you know, this time he actually seems kinda right! I hope he&#8217;s still just crazy though. [<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2223214/pagenum/all/#p2">Slate</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/why-amazons-power-to-delete-books-is-absolutely-horrifying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry&#8217;s Getting A Music Store In September</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/blackberrys-getting-a-music-store-in-september/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/blackberrys-getting-a-music-store-in-september/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry music store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=341291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIM&#8217;s signing up with 7Digital to bring a 6 million track library to BlackBerry phones starting September. The service will hit in &#8220;UK, US, Canada, France, Italy, Germany and Spain,&#8221; and will be priced at the standard $US0.99 track and $US9.99 album model. [TGDaily via Electronista]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIM&#8217;s signing up with 7Digital to bring a 6 million track library to BlackBerry phones starting September. The service will hit in &#8220;UK, US, Canada, France, Italy, Germany and Spain,&#8221; and will be priced at the standard $US0.99 track and $US9.99 album model. [<a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/43204/97/">TGDaily</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/13/rim.music.service.coming/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/blackberrys-getting-a-music-store-in-september/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Ruler</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/digital-ruler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/digital-ruler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This wooden, yet digital, concept ruler combines &#8220;values of a traditional ruler, with advantages of a digital interface.&#8221; I think it still needs lines, but how cool is it that it sets the zero point wherever you start measuring?



[noquedanblogs via notcot]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/regla1.jpg" alt="" class="left" />This wooden, yet digital, concept ruler combines &#8220;values of a traditional ruler, with advantages of a digital interface.&#8221; I think it still needs lines, but how cool is it that it sets the zero point wherever you start measuring?<span id="more-340341"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/regla3.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/regla4.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/regla2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><br />
[<a href="http://noquedanblogs.com">noquedanblogs</a> via <a href="http://notcot.org">notcot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/digital-ruler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panny IPod Merge Will Let You Connect IPod, Cameras To Inflight Ent</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/panasonic-ipod-merge-will-let-you-connect-ipod-cameras-to-inflight-entertainment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/panasonic-ipod-merge-will-let-you-connect-ipod-cameras-to-inflight-entertainment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod merge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic ipod merge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Mary RunwayGirl Kirby&#8212;I call her Freckles myself&#8212;you will be able to use Panasonic&#8217;s new iPod Merge inflight entertainment system to access your digital camera photos and fully access your iPod as early as this fall.
According to Panasonic, iPod merge is not just a connector for the iPod, but gives you full access to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/bizclass.jpg" alt="" class="left" />According to Mary <i>RunwayGirl</i> Kirby&mdash;I call her <i>Freckles</i> myself&mdash;you will be able to use Panasonic&#8217;s new iPod Merge inflight entertainment system to access your digital camera photos and fully access your iPod as early as this fall.<span id="more-338168"></span></p>
<p>According to Panasonic, iPod merge is not just a connector for the iPod, but gives you full access to your iPod multimedia content&mdash;including music and images&mdash;using a dedicated user interface integrated in their inflight entertainment system:</p>
<blockquote><p> Panasonic&#8217;s technology roadmap calls for introduction of iPod merge, which goes a step further then basic iPod connectivity by allowing content metadata to be integrated or &#8220;consumed&#8221; into the graphical user interface (GUI) and displayed to the passenger via the IFE screen.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> As you can see in the image, it also connects to digital cameras via USB, allowing you to extend your vacation a little more by seeing your fresh pictures on your way back home, and providing the rest of the passengers with <i>hours</i> of laughter and entertainment. [<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/runway-girl/2009/06/panasonics-ipod-merge-ready-by.html">Runway Girl</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/panasonic-ipod-merge-will-let-you-connect-ipod-cameras-to-inflight-entertainment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A PMP This Ugly and Expensive Had Better Sound Amazing</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/a_pmp_this_ugly_and_expensive_had_better_sound_amazing-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/a_pmp_this_ugly_and_expensive_had_better_sound_amazing-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amplifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hifiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/a_pmp_this_ugly_and_expensive_had_better_sound_amazing-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
But I think we&#8217;re clear on the sound quality front. The HifiMAN HM-801 is a digital audio player, yes, but its modular design allows for a portable amp to be popped right inside.


The lower half of the player is taken by a removable Burr-Brown amplifier, but can be easily removed and replaced with another amp, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/hifiman-05-13-09.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>But I think we&#8217;re clear on the sound quality front. The HifiMAN HM-801 is a digital audio player, yes, but its modular design allows for a portable amp to be popped right inside.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: pmps, amplifiers, burr-brown, daps, digital audio, hifiman, hifiman hm-801, portable amps --><br />
<span id="more-335864"></span>
<p>The lower half of the player is taken by a removable Burr-Brown amplifier, but can be easily removed and replaced with another amp, assuming the new amp fits. It&#8217;s a pretty barebones PMP otherwise, though&mdash;we&#8217;re talking no video support, not even any internal memory (supply your own with SDHC cards). It does support FLAC and WMA lossless, because really, what&#8217;s the point otherwise, but this is one PMP aimed squarely at the audiophile market, especially with a price of $US700 (or $US600 if purchased before its release in June). An included, modular amp is a very cool idea, and certainly a lot of today&#8217;s PMPs could benefit from the boost it would provide, we just wish it had a little more mass-market appeal. [<a href="http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f87/hifiman-hm-801-portable-music-player-preorder-424053/">Head-Fi</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/hifiman-hm-801-pmp-promises-to-make-audiophiles-happy-wallets-h/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/a_pmp_this_ugly_and_expensive_had_better_sound_amazing-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cassette To Digital USB Gadget Preserves Milli Vanilli For Eternity</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/cassette_to_digital_usb_gadget_preserves_milli_vanilli_for_eternity-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/cassette_to_digital_usb_gadget_preserves_milli_vanilli_for_eternity-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cassettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/cassette_to_digital_usb_gadget_preserves_milli_vanilli_for_eternity-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If, for some strange reason, you still have tons of cassettes lying around, this USB gadget from Japanese company Novac will help you convert them to MP3, WMA or WAV files.


The MV-CM001U can store MP3 and WMA files in 32/64/128/192/320kbps sizes, it features a 1.5W speaker and it has a surprisingly attractive wooden design. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/cassette-to-digital.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>If, for some strange reason, you still have tons of cassettes lying around, this USB gadget from Japanese company Novac will help you convert them to MP3, WMA or WAV files.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: usb, cassette, cassette to digital, digital music, gizmodo listening test, japan, listening test, mp3, mv-cm001u, novac, peripherals --><br />
<span id="more-334298"></span>
<p>The MV-CM001U can store MP3 and WMA files in 32/64/128/192/320kbps sizes, it features a 1.5W speaker and it has a surprisingly attractive wooden design. The device is only compatible with Windows XP or Vista, which is unfortunate because most of the people who would need it are probably still running Windows 98 or lower. [<a href="http://www.novac.co.jp/products/hardware/nv-capture/nv-cm001u/index.html">Novac</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/16/still-own-cassettes-digitize-them-with-this-new-gadget/">Crunchgear</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/04/16/cassette-to-digital.html">Boing Boing Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/cassette_to_digital_usb_gadget_preserves_milli_vanilli_for_eternity-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Need Audiophiles</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/why_we_need_audiophiles-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/why_we_need_audiophiles-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiophiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vinyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/why_we_need_audiophiles-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is Michael Fremer. He&#8217;s listening to &#8220;Avalon&#8221; by Roxy Music on his $US350,000 stereo system. It sounds excellent. He&#8217;s a bit crazy, but if you love music, you need him.


Fremer, if you have yet to decipher this, is an audiophile of the highest calibre. Literally millions of dollars of premium audio equipment have passed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/fremer-listeningroom-top_wm.jpg" alt="" />This is Michael Fremer. He&#8217;s listening to &#8220;Avalon&#8221; by Roxy Music on his $US350,000 stereo system. It sounds <em>excellent</em>. He&#8217;s a bit crazy, but if you love music, you need him.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: listening test, analog, audio, audiophiles, cds, digital, feature, michael fremer, music, sound, top, vinyl --><br />
<span id="more-334147"></span>
<p>Fremer, if you have yet to decipher this, is an audiophile of the highest calibre. Literally millions of dollars of premium audio equipment have passed through his listening room under review for <i>Stereophile</i> magazine, and he&#8217;s been obsessing about vinyl since he was four years old, memorising the labels of his parents&#8217; 78s. A man who, when digital recording and reproduction methods began to surface culminating in the compact disc&#8217;s takeover as the predominant music format, became a figurehead for the vinyl superiority movement, staunchly advocating its greater tonal resolution over a CD&#8217;s 44.1 kHz max. (See <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR7227_ndqQ">this MTV clip</a> for Fremer in action, circa 1993.)</p>
<p>In short, a species of human I had never known prior to hanging out with him in his New Jersey basement listening room last week, and a species, frankly, I was sceptical of in just about every possible way.</p>
<p>Upon getting picked up by Fremer at the train station near his home, my fears immediately began to feel all too real. It was but a minute or two into our car ride from the station that a rant on Walt Mossberg&#8217;s inferior review of the Airport Express, Apple&#8217;s music-streaming mini-router that Fremer and I both enjoy in our home systems, begins in earnest:</p>
<p>&#8220;If he&#8217;s not going to tell people how it sounds, then what&#8217;s the fucking point? Don&#8217;t step into my world, Walt!&#8221; And so on, referencing multiple emails of complaint he actually sent to Walt. I am definitely thinking &#8220;uh oh&#8221; at this point.</p>
<p>But then, settled into the lone leather chaise in Fremer&#8217;s basement audio temple, nestled right in the sweetspot of his $US65,000 Wilson MAXX3 speakers, I hear the needle drop on Air&#8217;s &#8220;Run&#8221; from <em>Talkie Walkie</em>. It&#8217;s a song I&#8217;ve never heard (kind of fell off Air after overusing <em>Moon Safari</em> considerably), but one that I&#8217;m now listening to all the time. Because, with all honesty, I have never heard anything like that song played on that stereo system at that moment. Ever.</p>
<p>The song ends, and after emerging from an opiate-like haze, I hear a hiss. And yes, while the record was playing, I heard a pop, a crackle or two. Isn&#8217;t this as high-end an audiophile system as they come? Shouldn&#8217;t the sound be of such purity so as to sustain life in lieu of water for days on end?</p>
<p>I mention this slight&mdash;very slight, but noticeable&mdash;hiss to Fremer, and it&#8217;s probably a frequency that 50 plus years of rocking have eliminated from his spectrum. He doesn&#8217;t even care. This is when I start to understand.</p>
<p>After hearing I&#8217;m a Bowie fan, Fremer drops into his near limitless stacks and spins a pressing of &#8220;Heroes&#8221; with part of the title track&#8217;s chorus in German. I&#8217;m giggling with pleasure at the frankly obscene level of detail I hear (<em>Ich! Ich werde König!</em>), but of course, I&#8217;m hearing the pops and crackles that a 30+ year-old record is likely to have. Shouldn&#8217;t a $US350,000 stereo system be completely free of such impurities?</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s like when you go to the symphony, and the old men are coughing&mdash;same thing,&#8221; Fremer says. Necessary impurities. Reminders of being in the real world.</p>
<p>We play my solid 256kbps VBR MP3 of &#8220;Heroes&#8221; off my iPod; it sounds like shit. Free of pops and crackles, yes, but completely lifeless, flat in every way. This is the detail that matters: Audiophiles are basically synesthesiacs. They &#8220;see&#8221; music in three-dimensional visual space. You close your eyes in Fremer&#8217;s chair, and you can perceive a detailed 3D matrix of sound, with each element occupying its own special space in the air. It&#8217;s crazy and I&#8217;ve never experienced anything like it.</p>
<p>It is within this 3D space where the audiophile lives and operates, and spends all his money. Fremer himself is the first to admit that it would only take $US3,000 to $US5,000 to build a system that will be deeply satisfying to most music fans. On a scale of 1 to 100 completely of my own devising, let&#8217;s put this system at around 85. Now, imagine that you&#8217;ve tasted 85, and you want to go higher; you want Bowie&#8217;s cries of kissing by the wall to inhabit the most perfect point in your system&#8217;s matrix, and Brian Ferry&#8217;s back-up fly girls on &#8220;Avalon&#8221; to flank him just beautifully. That, friends, is where you might end up paying <i>hundreds of thousands</i>.</p>
<p>Our little scale, unfortunately, is logarithmic, in that going from zero to 85 doesn&#8217;t take a lot of effort or money, but going from 98.6 to 99.1 by swapping out a $US2,600 AC power cable for a $US4,000 one becomes a justifiable end. We did exactly that, and I strained to hear any difference at all (more impressions of our test will follow later in the week), but to Fremer, the difference was abundantly clear&mdash;not necessarily better with the more expensive cable, but different, a warmer, fuller sound, as Fremer described it. </p>
<p>The point is, people like Fremer can not only hear the difference, they crave it. I walked into his listening room expecting to discern absolutely zero difference in the comparison tests we had planned, swapping out speaker cables that cost as much as a meal at the best restaurant in New York for another set that cost as much as a year of undergrad at Harvard. I actually did hear a tiny difference. But to people like Fremer, that tiny difference becomes a mind-boggling disparity, and it&#8217;s worth paying for if it means a few decimal points closer to perfection. Unfortunately, the logarithmic curve is asymptotic: There is no ceiling. Fremer will be the first to admit that this type of dragon chasing is not and should not be for everyone.</p>
<p>This obsession with tiny differences explains Fremer&#8217;s fevered defence of analogue music sources over digital. Two anecdotes from the past are particularly illuminative:</p>
<p>The first is his memories of rushing to the record store in 1979 to pick up Ry Cooder&#8217;s <em>Bop &#8216;Til You Drop</em>, the first mainstream rock release to be recorded using an all-digital process, which at the time was being lauded as the next big thing. But upon getting it home and dropping it into his high-end system, the results were not good:</p>
<p>&#8220;It made me feel horrible!&#8221; he remembers. Even though it was played on vinyl, Fremer could already detect some missing elements in the 3D audiophile space that just weren&#8217;t there. &#8220;And it&#8217;s not like I was a digiphobe at this point&mdash;I had no reason to be. I was as excited as anyone to hear this.&#8221;</p>
<p>The second was the first public playing of a compact disc, to a room full of expectant audiophiles a few years later. While they breathlessly applauded the first track played from the then refrigerator-sized device, Fremer was horrified. He heard the same flatness and lack of detail in the 3D audio world he loved to inhabit. &#8220;I felt&#8230;weird. My hands were shaking. All I could think, then, was WE&#8217;RE FUCKED!&#8221; A few days later, a new, custom-printed bumper sticker was slapped on Fremer&#8217;s car: &#8220;COMPACT DISCS SUCK.&#8221;</p>
<p>And thus began a long battle, and thankfully, it seems to have ended happily. Both with the advent of SACDs&mdash;which Fremer is a great fan of, proving that he&#8217;s not hung up on nostalgia; it&#8217;s all about sound resolution, maintaining all the peaks and valleys of recording&mdash;still a viable format among audio junkies, and the greater acceptance and continued life of vinyl, Fremer is a happy man these days. &#8220;I&#8217;m on top of the world right now. I set out to save vinyl, and we did it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because the thing is, Fremer loves music first and foremost. The audiophile I had feared was one who cares far more about the overpriced gadgetry than the actual music. This is not who I ended up meeting. This man listens to music and makes sure it was recorded with the best fidelity, that the intents of the artist have been preserved. And thank God he does, because we certainly don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I listen to most of my music on downloaded, compressed, lossy MP3s, and so do you. But even if you can&#8217;t hear the sound quality, we need someone like Fremer up on that wall, a preservationist of archival recordings and an ombudsman for new recordi<br />
ng techniques, because one day you&#8217;ll want to hear it, and it&#8217;ll be there because of audiophiles.</p>
<p>These guardians in and outside of the recording industry ensure that, whether it&#8217;s in a movie theatre tomorrow or in your own home listening room on some far off future date, you&#8217;ll be able always get back to a recording that expresses every frequency, every ounce of warmth and life, of the original performance. Because if you can hear, it, if you ever get to live in that 3D space, you&#8217;ll be glad Fremer helped defend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/why_we_need_audiophiles-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
